Salvatore TATARELLA
Constituencies
-
Italy
Il Popolo della Libertà
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
-
Italy
Futuro e Libertà per l'Italia
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
Italy
Alleanza nazionale
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Italy
Alleanza nazionale
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Italy
Alleanza nazionale
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
-
Italy
Alleanza nazionale
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
Groups
-
PPE
Member of the Bureau
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
2012/02/03 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
2009/07/14 - 2012/02/02
-
UEN
Member
Union for Europe of the Nations Group
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
NA
Member
Non-attached
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
-
NA
Member
Non-attached
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
-
UEN
Member
Union for Europe of the Nations Group
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Transport and Tourism | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Special committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering | 2012/05/09 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vice-Chair of | Delegation for relations with Israel | 2012/04/25 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Iran | 2012/02/02 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Israel | 2012/02/15 | 2012/04/24 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council | 2012/02/02 | 2012/02/14 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Iran | 2009/09/16 | 2012/02/01 |
| Vice-Chair of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2008/11/03 | 2009/07/13 |
| Member of | Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly | 2008/06/16 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries | 2008/06/18 | 2009/07/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2008/05/21 | 2008/11/02 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2007/03/15 | 2008/06/17 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly | 2004/09/15 | 2008/06/15 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2007/03/14 | 2008/05/20 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2004/09/15 | 2007/03/13 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2006/12/31 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf States | 1999/02/24 | 1999/07/19 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf States | 1997/10/14 | 1999/02/23 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf States | 1997/01/16 | 1997/10/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf States | 1997/01/16 | 1997/10/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf States | 1997/10/14 | 1999/02/23 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf States | 1999/02/24 | 1999/07/19 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2006/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2004/09/15 | 2007/03/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly | 2004/09/15 | 2008/06/15 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2007/03/14 | 2008/05/20 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2007/03/15 | 2008/06/17 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2008/05/21 | 2008/11/02 |
| Member of | Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly | 2008/06/16 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries | 2008/06/18 | 2009/07/13 |
| Vice-Chair of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2008/11/03 | 2009/07/13 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://www.tatarella.it/
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45276
- Fax
- +322 28 49276
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 08E209
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75276
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79276
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T10056
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Parlamento europeo
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 08E209
- B-1047 Bruxelles
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2012/0191(COD) | Reducing CO2 emissions from new light commercial vehicles: modalities for reaching the 2020 target |
| Opinion | 2011/2148(INI) | Towards a space strategy for the European Union that benefits its citizens |
| Shadow | 2011/0409(COD) | Sound level of motor vehicles |
| Shadow | 2011/0304(NLE) | Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against pollution resulting from exploration and exploitation of the continental shelf and the seabed and its subsoil. Accession to the Offshore Protocol of the Barcelona Convention |
| Opinion | 2011/0197(COD) | Harmonisation of recreational crafts and personal watercrafts |
| Responsible | 2011/0002(COD) | Air pollution: application of emission stages to narrow-track tractors (amend. Directive 2000/25/EC) |
| Responsible | 2010/0301(COD) | Air quality: provisions for tractors placed on the market under the flexibility scheme (amend. Directive 2000/25/EC) |
| Responsible | 2008/0152(COD) | EU Ecolabel (repeal. Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000) |
| Responsible | 1997/2281(COS) | Perspectives and priorities for the ASEM processus, Asia-Europe |
Born
1947/10/11 Cerignola- Degree in law from the University of Bari (1972).
- Lawyer (since 1974).
- Head office of the Popolo della Libertà party (2009).
- Member of the Provincial Council of Foggia (1981-1985); Mayor of Cerignola (1993-1999); Deputy Mayor of Bari (2003-2004). Member of Apulia Regional Council (1990-1994). Member of the Italian Chamber of Deputies (1999-2001).
- Member of the European Parliament (1994-1999 and since 2004). Member of the Committee of the Regions (2001-2004).
- Member of the board of Italia Lavoro s.p.a. (2002-2003). Vice-Chair of the Apulia branch of the National Association of Italian Municipalities (ANCI) (2000-2009).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 2 |
2007/0286(COD) Industrial emissions. Integrated pollution prevention and control (repeal. Directives 78/176/EEC, 82/883/EEC, 92/112/EEC, 1999/13/EC, 2000/76/EC and 2008/1/EC). Recast
2010/03/30
ENVI
1 amendments...
Amendment 126 #
Council position Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1a (new) For BAT reference documents adopted before the entry into force of the Directive, emission limit values shall also take into account the technical characteristics of the installation concerned, its geographical location and the local environmental conditions.
source: PE-439.994
2010/03/31
ENVI
1 amendments...
Amendment 292 #
Council position Annex I – point 3.5 3.5. Manufacture of ceramic products by firing, in particular roofing tiles, bricks, refractory bricks, tiles, stoneware or porcelain with a production capacity exceeding 75 tonnes per day and
source: PE-440.003
|
| 5 |
2008/0028(COD) Provision of food information to consumers (amend. Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006; repeal. Directives 90/496/EEC and 2000/13/EC)
2011/03/23
ENVI
5 amendments...
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. Without prejudice to specific Union provisions applicable to particular foods as regards the requirements referred to in points (a) to (k) of Article 9(1), when appearing on the package or on the label attached thereto, the mandatory particulars listed in Article 9(1) shall be printed on the package or on the label in characters using a font size where the x
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. In case of packaging or containers the largest printable surface of which has an area of less than
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 a (new) 25a. The name or address of the food business operator placed on the label does not constitute an indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of the food product concerned.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The energy content, expressed in kcal per 100g or 100ml or per portion, shall be repeated in the bottom right-hand corner of the front-of-pack, in a font size of 3 mm and surrounded by a boarder.
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.
source: PE-460.950
|
| 9 |
2008/0147(COD) Road transport: charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of infrastructure (amend. Directive 1999/62/EC)
2011/03/22
TRAN
9 amendments...
Amendment 32 #
Council position – amending act Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In order to avoid distorting competition in the road freight sector, mark-ups for pollution and congestion costs may be introduced by the Member States provided that existing domestic taxation in this sector – including vehicle ownership and/or traffic taxes, along with fuel taxes – is not reduced in such a way as to subsidise national operators. Fulfilment of this requirement must be demonstrated when the mark-up for external costs is introduced, and the Commission must carry out a prior check on, and subsequently monitor, compliance with the requirement.
Amendment 34 #
Council position – amending act Recital 13 a (13a) The increased cost of road freight resulting from external-cost charges for pollution and congestion must, along the relevant road links, be coupled with alternatives in terms of infrastructure, modal solutions and the provision of services by operators under access and service conditions based in particular on competition and market comparisons. In accordance with the implementing principles for inter-modal, intra-modal and co-modal shifts of traffic flows, Member States intending to introduce mark-ups for pollution and congestion costs must therefore show that these requirements are being met, including in terms of programming commitments to be implemented within a predetermined timeframe.
Amendment 43 #
Council position – amending act Article 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 1999/62/EC Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) (1a) In Article 6, the following paragraph shall be added : ‘(4a) The introduction and application of mark-ups under Article 7b(2) shall not be coupled with reductions in vehicle and fuel taxes. The Commission shall monitor the proper implementation of this paragraph.’
Amendment 47 #
Council position – amending act Article 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) The introduction of external-cost charges is dependent on the availability of modal alternatives to the relevant section of road and of competitive services thereon. The Commission shall ensure that the Member States fulfil this requirement within a reasonable timeframe.
Amendment 51 #
Council position – amending act Article 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 c – paragraph 3 3. The external-cost charge related to traffic-based air pollution shall not apply to vehicles which comply with the most stringent EURO emission standards until f
Amendment 62 #
Council position – amending act Article 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 f – paragraph 5 5. The amount of the mark-up shall be deducted from the amount of the external cost charge calculated in accordance with Article 7c, except for vehicles of EURO emission classes 0, I and II;. The related revenues shall be invested in financing the construction of priority projects of European interest identified in Annex III to Decision No 1692/96/EC.
Amendment 66 #
Council position – amending act Article 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 3 – point (c) (c) no infrastructure charge is more than 1
Amendment 67 #
Council position – amending act Article 1 – point 2 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 7 g – paragraph 3 – point (d) (d) the peak periods during which the higher infrastructure charges are levied for the purpose of reducing congestion do not exceed
Amendment 82 #
Council position – amending act Article 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/62/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall determine the use of revenues generated by this Directive. The revenues generated from external-cost charges, or the equivalent in financial value of these revenues, sh
source: PE-460.939
|
| 26 |
2009/0173(COD) Reduction of CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles: emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles
2010/05/21
ENVI
10 amendments...
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Manufacturers should have flexibility to decide how to meet their targets under this Regulation and should be allowed to average emissions over their new vehicle fleet rather than having to respect CO2 targets for each individual vehicle. Manufacturers should therefore be required to ensure that the average specific emission for all the new light commercial vehicles registered in the Community for which they are responsible does not exceed the average of the emissions targets for those vehicles. This requirement should be phased in between 201
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 For the calendar year commencing 1 January 201
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – indent 3 – 100 % from 201
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. By 1 January 2018, the Commission shall complete a review of the specific emission target in Annex I and of the derogations in Article 10, with the aim of defining: – the modalities for reaching a long-term target of 145 g CO2/km, starting in 2025, in a cost-effective manner; and – the aspects of the implementation of that targets, including the excess emissions premium. On the basis of such a review and its impact assessment, which includes an overall assessment of the impact on the car industry and its dependent industries, the Commission shall, if appropriate, make a proposal to amend this Regulation in a way which is as neutral as possible from the point of view of competition, and which is socially equitable and sustainable. The European Commission shall make a proposal to the European Parliament and European Council on those measures, designed to amend essential elements of this Regulation.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 7 7.
source: PE-442.811
2010/10/05
TRAN
16 amendments...
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Manufacturers should have flexibility to decide how to meet their targets under this Regulation and should be allowed to average emissions over their new vehicle fleet rather than having to respect CO2 targets for each individual vehicle. Manufacturers should therefore be required to ensure that the average specific emission for all the new light commercial vehicles registered in the Community for which they are responsible does not exceed the average of the emissions targets for those vehicles. This requirement should be phased in between 201
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Manufacturers’ compliance with the targets under this Regulation should be assessed at the Community level. Manufacturers whose average specific emissions of CO2 exceed those permitted under this Regulation should pay an excess emissions premium with respect to each calendar year from 1 January 201
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) new ‘complete vehicle’ means any vehicle which need not be completed in order to meet the relevant technical requirements of Directive 2007/46/EC.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 For the calendar year commencing 1 January 201
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – indents 1, 2 and 3 –
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. In respect of the period 1 January 201
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1 –
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 - indent 2 -
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 The European Commission shall make a proposal to the European Parliament and Council on those measures, designed to amend
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 – paragraph B – point 7 source: PE-441.205
|
| 8 |
2009/2096(INI) A sustainable future for transport
2009/11/12
ENVI
5 amendments...
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Draws attention to the predicted trend towards an increasing degree of urbanisation of our society, hence the increasing importance of spatial planning and attractive and efficient mass transport systems that are geared to the new technologies and are able to compete with private vehicles in terms of cost, method and journey time, especially with regard to urban transport,
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraphs 2 a (new) and 2 b (new) 2a. Highlights the importance of checking that the maximum speed limit of 50 km/h is strictly complied with in urban areas; as various studies and research have shown, this has a dual impact: firstly, it reduces pollutant emissions and secondly, the number of accidents and road deaths which are known to affect a substantial percentage of the population in densely inhabited areas; 2b. Highlights the need to institutionalise the concept of environmentally friendly driving, or eco-driving, and to make it compulsory when training young drivers, since, by taking simple measures when driving, fuel consumption can demonstrably be reduced by up to 30%, thereby reducing air pollution from CO2, unburned hydrocarbons (UHC) and fine dust;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers compliance with air quality norms as laid down in EU legislation as crucial given the increase in respiratory, cardiovascular and other diseases related to air pollution, mainly resulting from transport.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for, as regards the improvement of quality of life, transport to be adapted to persons with reduced mobility, who have the inalienable right, enshrined in Article 9 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, of access to all forms of transport. This is a cornerstone of non-discrimination in the free movement of persons, which also offers economic, cultural and tourism-related benefits.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the fact that road transport has brought down considerably its emissions of particulate matter (PM 10), acidifying substances and ozone precursors, but is still worried about its level of nitrogen oxides and of fine particulates (Term report 2008, fig. 5.1) . Is however particularly disappointed about its CO2 emissions, which in the period from 1990 - 2006 increased by 28 %, compared to a reduction of 3 % in the other sectors. Calls for freight traffic to be gradually transferred off the roads and onto rail
source: PE-430.949
2010/03/26
TRAN
3 amendments...
Amendment 356 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 6 a (new) - an aspirational goal of 50% reduction in CO2 emissions caused by aircraft throughout EU airspace by 2050,
Amendment 357 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 6 b (new) - a carbon-neutral growth for air transport from 2020 and onwards,
Amendment 358 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 - indent 6 c (new) - a fuel efficiency of 1.5% per year for air transport,
source: PE-439.922
|
| 2 |
2010/0063(COD) Statistics on tourism (repeal. Directive 95/57/EC)
2010/05/10
TRAN
2 amendments...
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 - paragraph 1 - point m a (new) (ma) ‘same-day visits’ shall mean visits by people travelling within the space of a single day for purposes of tourism and/or recreation.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II - Section 2 - point 17 a (new) 17a. Expenditure Annual of the individual tourist during the trip on catering
source: PE-449.025
|
| 20 |
2010/0301(COD) Air quality: provisions for tractors placed on the market under the flexibility scheme (amend. Directive 2000/25/EC)
2011/02/22
ENVI
20 amendments...
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 3 (3) Directive 2000/25/EC provides for a flexibility scheme to allow tractor manufacturers to purchase,
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 5 (5) During
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 7 (7) The measures provided in this Directive reflect a temporary difficulty faced by the industry; as such, these measures shall be restricted to
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 7 a (new) (7a) It is understood that the current emission limits shall be tightened with respect to ultrafine black carbon particles by implementing the particle number criterion in future legislation addressing the next emission targets.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 7 b (new) (7b) In order to ensure the environmental performance of engines, as intended by the legislator, during most of the lifetime of a vehicle, new emission legislation should also include provisions on on- board diagnostic systems (OBD).
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point -1 (new) Directive 2000/25/EC Article 1 - new indents (-1) In Article 1, the following indents are added: - "flexibility scheme": the exemption procedure by means of which a Member State permits the placing on the market of a limited quantity of engines in accordance with the requirements set by Article 3a; - "engine category": the classification of engines which combines the power band with the stage of exhaust emission limits.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Directive 2000/25/EC Article 3a – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 2 Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 1 2.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex 1 – introductory part Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 1 Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex I Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 1 - point 1.1. 1.1.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex I Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 1 - point 1.1.1. 1.1.1. The number of engines
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex I Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 1 - point 1.1.2. 1.1.2. As an alternative option to section 1.1.1., the
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex I Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 1 - point 1.1.2. - table - titles Engine
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex I Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 1 - point 1.2. 1.2. During
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex I Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 1 - point 1.2.1. 1.2.1. The number of engines
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex I Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 1 - point 1.2.2. 1.2.2. As an alternative option to section 1.2.1., the
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex I Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 1 - point 1.2.2. - table - titles Engine
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex I Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 1 - point 1.3. - introductory part 1.3. The tractor manufacturer shall include in his application to
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex I Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 2 2. ACTIONS BY THE ENGINE MANUFACTURER 2.1. An engine manufacturer may place on the market engines under a flexibility scheme approved in accordance with sections 1 and 3 of this annex. 2.2. The engine manufacturer must mark those engines with the following text: ‘Engine placed on the market under the flexibility scheme’ in accordance with the requirements referred to in Section 5 of Annex I.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex I Directive 2000/25/EC Annex IV - section 3 3. ACTIONS BY THE APPROVAL AUTHORITY 3.1. The approval authority shall evaluate the content of the flexibility scheme request and the enclosed documents. As a consequence it will inform the tractor manufacturer of its decision as to whether or not to allow use of the flexibility scheme as requested.
source: PE-458.787
|
| 2 |
2010/2084(INI) European initiative on Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias
2010/11/11
ENVI
2 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Encourages all the Member States to engage actively in the definition, development and implementation of common protocols
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points to the importance of a multidisciplinary approach on ways in which cooperation and coordination in the field of research at European level can improve knowledge, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and social research into the welfare of patients and their families and carers; believes that
source: PE-452.652
|
| 1 |
2010/2112(INI) Recognition of agriculture as a strategic sector in the context of food security
2010/09/11
ENVI
1 amendments...
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that the EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) has a major role to play in the assessment and notification of all risks associated with the food chain as part of a set of measures designed to protect the health and wellbeing of the public; hopes that all Member States will set up corresponding national bodies to collaborate with the European Food Safety Authority;
source: PE-452.663
|
| 3 |
2010/2235(INI) European road safety 2011-2020
2011/03/17
TRAN
3 amendments...
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Recommends th
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Welcomes the Commission
source: PE-460.852
|
| 13 |
2011/0156(COD) Food intended for infants and young children and food for special medical purposes
2012/01/26
ENVI
13 amendments...
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Title Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on food intended for infants and young children
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) A limited number of categories of food constitutes the sole source of nourishment of certain groups of the population or represent a partial source of nourishment; such categories of food are vital for the management of certain conditions and/or are essential to maintain the intended nutritional adequacy for certain well-established vulnerable groups of the population. Those categories of food include infant formulae and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) To ensure legal certainty, definitions laid down in Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) This Regulation should provide the criteria for the establishment of the specific compositional and information requirements for infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food,
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) It is appropriate to establish and update a Union list of
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Currently, the statements
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. This Regulation establishes compositional and information requirements for the following categories of food for specialised nutrition:
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) food for people intolerant to gluten.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new) (ha) 'food for people intolerant to gluten' means foodstuffs for particular nutritional uses which are specially produced, prepared and/or processed to meet the special dietary needs of people intolerant to gluten;
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15 to adapt the definitions of
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Subject to the general requirements of Articles 7 and 9 and taking into account Directive 2006/141/EC, Directive 2006/125/EC
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 source: PE-480.592
|
| 8 |
2011/0172(COD) Energy efficiency
2011/07/11
ENVI
8 amendments...
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. 1. Each Member State shall set up an energy efficiency obligation scheme. This scheme shall ensure that either all energy distributors or all retail energy sales companies operating on the Member State's territory achieve annual energy savings
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that enterprises not included in the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 are subject and encouraged to an energy audit carried out in
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. By 1 January 2014, Member States shall establish and notify to the Commission a national heating and cooling plan for developing the potential for the application of high-efficiency cogeneration and efficient district heating and cooling
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part 3. Member States shall ensure that in the promotion areas with cogeneration potential as identified according to paragraph 2, all new thermal electricity generation installations with a total thermal input exceeding 20 MW:
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 6. Member States shall ensure that, in the promotion areas with cogeneration potential as identified according to paragraph 2, whenever an existing electricity generation installation with a total rated thermal input exceeding 20 MW is substantially refurbished or when, in accordance with Article 21 of Directive 2010/75/EC, its permit is updated, the technical and economic feasibility of a conversion to allow its operation as a high- efficiency cogeneration installation is set as a preferential condition in the new or updated permit or licence, provided that the installation is sited in a location where the
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States should not set targets for the industries which are exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage, as determined in Commission Decision 2010/2/EU. Should they nonetheless decide to do so, Member States shall express possible sectoral targets for production processes in these industries in energy use per output unit so as to avoid impeding industrial growth.
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 source: PE-475.843
|
| 11 |
2011/0190(COD) Prevention of pollution from ships: sulphur content of marine fuels
2011/12/16
ENVI
11 amendments...
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) Passenger ships operate mostly in ports or close to coastal areas and their impacts on human health and the environment are significant.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) In order to ensure air quality benefits to the Member States whose coasts are not part of SECAs, the introduction of any new emission control areas should be subject to the IMO process under Annex VI to MARPOL and be underpinned by a well-founded case based on environmental and economic grounds and supported by scientific data, as stipulated in the Commission's Communication on the review of the implementation of Directive 1999/32/EC related to the Sulphur Content of Certain Liquid Fuels and on further pollutant emission reduction from maritime transport1. ___________________ 1 COM(2011) 441 final.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 a (new) (7a) In order to ensure air quality benefits to the Member States whose coasts are not part of SECAs, the introduction of any new emission control areas should be subject to the IMO process under Annex VI to MARPOL and be underpinned by a well-founded case based on environmental and economic grounds and supported by scientific data.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 a (new) (12a) It is advisable to require Member States to apply "no special fee" policies to effluents from exhaust gas cleaning systems in ports to ensure proper care of any wastes from the use of alternative abatement methods.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) In order to determine the date of the application of 0.50% sulphur limit, to designate new SECAs, to approve new alternative abatement methods and to establish the appropriate conditions for their use, to ensure appropriate monitoring of sulphur content of fuels and the harmonized content and the format of Member States' reports and to adapt the provisions of the Directive to scientific and technical progress, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specification of the date from which the maximum sulphur content of fuel of 0.50% by mass should apply in the Union,
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 2 – point 3 m 3m. emission abatement method means any fitting, material, appliance or apparatus to be fitted in a ship or other procedure, alternative fuel, or compliance method, used as an alternative to low sulphur marine fuel meeting the requirements set out in this Directive, that is verifiable, quantifiable and enforceable, according to emission abatement methods agreed upon in the IMO;
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 3 a Member States shall ensure that marine fuels are not used
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) 0.50
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the date from which the sulphur standard laid down in point (b) of this paragraph applies in accordance with the final decision taken in the IMO. Based on the assessment
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a a (new) 6a. The following Article shall be inserted: „Article 4aa. Fuel Oil Availability Notwithstanding the provisions contained in Articles 3, 3a and Article 4, 4a: 1. If a ship is found by a Member State not to be in compliance with the standards for compliant fuel oils laid down in this Directive, the competent authority of the Member State may require the ship to: (a) present a record of the actions taken to attempt to achieve compliance; and (b) provide evidence that it attempted to purchase fuel oil in accordance with its voyage plan and, if it was not made available where planned, that attempts were made to locate alternative sources for such fuel oil, and that despite best efforts to obtain compliant fuel oil, no such fuel oil was made available for purchase. 2. The ship should not be required to deviate from its intended voyage or to delay unduly the voyage in order to achieve compliance. 3. If a ship provides the information set out in paragraph 1, Member States shall take into account all relevant circumstances and the evidence presented to determine the appropriate action to take, including not taking control measures. 4. A ship shall notify its administration and the competent authority of the relevant port of destination when it cannot purchase compliant fuel oil. 5. Member States shall notify the Commission when a ship has presented evidence of the non-availability of compliant fuel oil.”
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 2 2. Ships using the emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall con
source: PE-478.489
|
| 3 |
2011/0229(COD) Food safety: electronic identification of bovine animals and beef labelling
2012/02/17
ENVI
3 amendments...
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 14 Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 Articles 16 - 18 source: PE-480.879
|
| 4 |
2011/0273(COD) European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): support to the European territorial cooperation goal
2012/03/05
TRAN
4 amendments...
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) Cross-border cooperation should aim to tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions (such as poor accessibility, inappropriate business environment, lack of networks among local and regional administrations, research and innovation and take-up of information and communication technologies, environmental pollution, risk prevention, negative attitudes towards neighbouring country citizens) and exploit the untapped potentials in the border area (development of cross-border research and innovation facilities and clusters, cross-border labour market integration, cooperation among universities or health centres, and development of specific projects in the tourism sector), while enhancing the cooperation process for the purpose of the overall harmonious development of the Union. In the case of any cross-border programme between Northern Ireland and the border counties of Ireland in support of peace and reconciliation, the ERDF shall also contribute to promoting social and economic stability in the regions concerned, notably by actions to promote cohesion between communities.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 3 – point d a (new) (da) exchange of experience concerning the identification, transfer and dissemination of good practice on tourism and transport networks.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – point a – point iv a (new) iv a) carrying out and promoting actions in the tourism sector intended to develop the areas concerned;
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – point b b) under transnational cooperation: development and implementation of macro-regional and sea-basin strategies (within the thematic objective of enhancing institutional capacity
source: PE-487.938
|
| 7 |
2011/0387(COD) European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT): strategic innovation agenda 2014-2020
2012/06/29
ITRE
7 amendments...
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – part 1 – point 1.2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 · Enhancing the impact of investments on education, research and innovation and testing new ways for innovation governance: The EIT acts as a catalyst, adding value to the existing research base, by accelerating the take-up and exploitation of technologies and research outcomes and by transferring research results to all the levels of education. Innovation activities contribute in turn to align and leverage research investments and to make education and training activities more responsive to business needs. To this end, the EIT has been equipped with a substantial degree of flexibility to test out new innovation models, allowing for true differentiation in the KICs' governance and funding models and quick adaptation to better cope with emerging opportunities.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – part 2 – point 2.1 – point 2.1.2 – paragraph 5 – point 6 · Urban mobility, smart and sustainable development.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Factsheet 6 – title Urban Mobility, smart and sustainable development.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Factsheet 6 – part 1 – paragraph 1 The theme of smart, green and integrated transport has been identified as one of the major societal challenges which will be addressed within the framework of Horizon 2020. The 2011 Transport White Paper further reinforces the importance of taking action in this domain during the next decade. Urban mobility is a particularly challenging task. It should be addressed through a truly integrated and holistic approach, taking explicitly into account the interaction with the other topics in a spatial context. It addresses a number of topics such as transport (including new mobility concepts, transport organisation, logistics, transport systems safety and security), environmental issues (reduction of greenhouse gases, air pollution and noise) urban planning, urban and natural landscape (new concepts for bringing work and living closer together), cultural heritage and has an important impact both at the economic and social levels (new business creation, employment, social inclusion, housing and location strategies). The overarching aim is to improve the quality of life of European citizens who – in increasing numbers – live in large urban conglomerations where much of Europe's economic performance is generated.13
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Factsheet 6 – part 2 – paragraph 1 The key objective of a KIC on urban mobility and smart and sustainable development will be to ensure a greener, more inclusive, safer and smarter urban mobility system.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Factsheet 6 – part 2 – paragraph 2 As already outlined above, the theme is highly relevant from a societal and public policy point of view. It also is highly relevant from a socio-economic perspective since it involves important economic sectors in GDP and employment terms, such as the automotive or the construction sectors. Urban mobility is, in addition, linked with environmental protection strategies and fully embedded in policies of social inclusion, location, housing
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – Factsheet 6 – part 2 – paragraph 3 A KIC on urban mobility and smart and sustainable development is both in line with the priorities defined in Horizon 2020 and with Europe 2020 strategy objectives of achieving a smarter, more sustainable, low carbon and inclusive urban development. A KIC in this thematic area could contribute to each of Europe 2020 strategy objectives by, for example, the promotion of eco-efficient solutions, intelligent ICT schemes for traffic management, and provision of more efficient and affordable transport services.
source: PE-492.619
|
| 6 |
2011/0397(COD) Groundhandling services at Union airports
2012/10/10
TRAN
6 amendments...
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. All airport users shall be
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. Where, following the selection procedure laid down in Articles 7 to 10, a supplier of groundhandling services mentioned in paragraph 1 loses its authorisation to provide these services, Member States m
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 3 3. Suppliers of groundhandling services and self-handling airport users shall respect these minimum quality standards. In addition, airport users and suppliers of groundhandling services shall respect the minimum quality standards in their contractual relations. The public authority concerned shall either directly or upon notification by the managing body of the airport impose appropriate penalties where the minimum quality standards laid down in the Airport Regulations and referred to in Paragraph (2) are not complied with. To ensure suppliers of groundhandling services comply with minimum requirements, the managing body of the airport shall have access to information on the parameters for groundhandling services laid down in the Service Level Agreements (SLAs). If the managing body finds that the SLAs do not comply with the airport’s minimum quality standards, it may ask the supervisory authority to take the appropriate action. These standards must be objective, proportional and non- discriminatory.
source: PE-496.364
|
| 17 |
2011/0401(COD) Horizon 2020 - Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020
2012/06/25
ENVI
17 amendments...
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 a (new) (30a) The participation of research teams in different projects should be contemplated as the reinforcement of quality and the possibility of an international co-operation.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) 'Research infrastructures' (RI) "are facilities, resources, organisational systems and services that are used by the research communities to conduct research and innovation in their fields. Where relevant, they may be used beyond research, e.g. for education or public services. This includes: major scientific equipment (or sets of instruments); knowledge-based resources such as collections, archives or scientific data; e- infrastructures, such as data, computing and software systems, communication networks and systems to promote openness and digital trust; any other infrastructure of a unique nature essential to achieve excellence in research and innovation."
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) 'Trans - European technology transfer' means the transfer of scientific outcomes and technology between public and private bodies located in different EU Member States.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new) (eb) 'Smart Specialization' means the concept for the development of the R&D and innovation policy of the European Union. The objective of smart specialization is to promote efficient and effective use of public investment using synergies among countries and regions and strengthening their innovation capacity. The smart specialization strategy is made of a multi-annual strategy program which goal is to develop a functional national or regional research innovation system.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 Horizon 2020 shall play a central role in the delivery of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by providing a common strategic framework for the Union's research and innovation funding, thus acting as a vehicle for leveraging private investment, transferring research results to all the levels of education, creating new job opportunities and ensuring Europe's long- term sustainable growth and competitiveness.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 Horizon 2020 shall play a central role in the delivery of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by providing a common strategic framework for the Union's research and innovation funding, thus acting as a vehicle for leveraging private investment, creating new job opportunities and ensuring Europe's long-term sustainable growth and competitiveness. Trans - European technology transfer should be the main tool in achieving these goals.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. Horizon 2020 shall contribute to building an economy based on knowledge and innovation across the whole Union by leveraging sufficient additional research, development and innovation funding. Thereby, it shall support the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy and other Union policies, as well as the achievement and functioning of the European Research Area (ERA)
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c – point i (new) i) Knowledge science and technology. Life sciences, Health, earth, environment, natural resources and food security.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c – point ii (new) ii) Social, Economic and Humanities. Demographic challenges, education, territorial issues, governance, culture, digital contents, humanities, cultural heritage and intangible knowledge areas.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Linkages and interfaces shall be implemented across and within the priorities of Horizon 2020. Particular attention shall be paid in this respect to the development and application of key enabling and industrial technologies, to bridging from discovery to market application, to cross-disciplinary research and innovation, to social and economic sciences and humanities , to a systemic approach of the spatial, urban and territorial issues, to fostering the functioning and achievement of the ERA, to cooperation with third countries, to responsible research and innovation including gender, and to enhancing the attractiveness of the research profession and to facilitating cross-border and cross- sector mobility of researchers.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 Horizon 2020 shall be implemented in a manner ensuring that the priorities and actions supported are relevant to changing needs and take account of the evolving nature of science, technology, innovation, markets and society, where innovation includes business, organisational and social aspects and transfer of science results to all the levels of education and training.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) the added value of action at Union level, particularly the Trans - European nature;
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new) (ea) Helping the creation and strengthening of association networks of researchers, patients and stakeholders in order to improve the relations and exchanges among them, concerned sectors, institutions and civil society.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – paragraph 7 a (new) New instrument: implementation of a clear program for the transfer of science, research and innovation to the education content at all levels, as well as for the adaptation of the technologies to the use.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – part III Priority 'Societal Challenges' – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f b) Smart cities and cultural heritage
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – part I – point 4.3 a (new) 4.3 a. Constitution of a data base concerning the results of the research and innovation The aim shall be to create and to make available a data base of the results of research and innovation. This will be open to international collaboration. Both research groups and enterprises will add contents to this data base in order to help the launch of a market of innovation and cooperation and to stimulate the meeting of possible partners.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – part III – point 1.1 – paragraph 1 a (new) It should be needed to strengthen research on diseases that are derived from the increase of temperature and climate change which affect Mediterranean countries in particular but not only them.
source: PE-492.556
|
| 12 |
2011/0402(CNS) Horizon 2020 - Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020: specific programme implementing Horizon 2020
2012/03/07
ITRE
6 amendments...
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (new) i) Knowledge science and technology. Life sciences, Health, earth, environment, natural resources and food security.
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (new) ii) Social, Economic and Humanities. Demographic challenges, education, territorial issues, governance, culture, digital contents, humanities, cultural heritage and intangible knowledge areas.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) strengthening the knowledge transfer from research and innovation to all levels of education
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Part III
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The instruments for the connexion between Research, Innovation and the Structural Funds shall be implemented through the programmes "Regions of Knowledge" and "Smart specialisations", both instruments should be located inside ERA, in order to create objective indicators for the stairway of excellence
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a decision Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.5 – paragraph 1 A key added value of research and innovation funded at the Union level is the possibility to disseminate and communicate results on a continent wide scale to enhance their impact. Horizon 2020 will therefore include, under all of its specific objectives, dedicated support to dissemination (including through open access to research results), communication and dialogue actions, with a strong emphasis on communicating results to end- users, citizens, civil society organisations, industry and policy makers. To this extent, Horizon 2020 may make use of networks for information transfer. Communication activities undertaken in the context of Horizon 2020 will also seek to raise public awareness on the importance of research and innovation by means of publications, events, knowledge repositories, databases, websites or a targeted use of social media. In order to simplify the access to information and to develop an instrument with all the information demanded by the research community and, having regard the need for a transparency, Cordis, as a digital instrument should be revised and reformed in a more clear and flexible way.
source: PE-492.816
2012/05/07
ITRE
1 amendments...
Amendment 751 #
Proposal for a decision Annex 1 – section 3 – point 3 – point 3.1 – point 3.1.3 – paragraph 1 Urban areas are one of the largest consumers of energy in the Union and emit a correspondingly large share of greenhouse gases, while generating a substantial amount of air pollutants. In that context, there is a need of promoting integrated systemic urban development strategies that take into account: energy efficiency, accessibility, green spaces, adaptation of habitats and social integration. At the same time, urban areas are affected by decreasing air quality and climate change and have to develop their own mitigation and adaptation strategies. Finding innovative energy solutions (energy efficiency, electricity and heating and cooling supply systems), integrated with transport, waste and water treatment as well as ICT solutions for the urban environment are therefore crucial in the transformation towards a low carbon society. Targeted initiatives in support to the convergence of industrial value chains of the energy, transport and ICT sector for smart urban applications need to be envisaged. At the same time, new technological, organisational, planning and business models need to be developed and tested at full scale according to the needs and means of cities and communities. Research is also needed to understand the social, economic and cultural issues that are involved in this transformation.
source: PE-492.814
2012/06/20
ENVI
3 amendments...
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) strengthening the knowledge transfer from research and innovation to all levels of education;
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. The instruments for the connexion between Research, Innovation the Structural Funds should be implemented through programs, "Regions of Knowledge" and "Smart specialisations, both instruments should be located inside ERA, in order to create objective indicators for the stairs of excellence
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a decision Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.5 – paragraph 1 A key added value of research and innovation funded at the Union level is the possibility to disseminate and communicate results on a continent wide scale to enhance their impact. Horizon 2020 will therefore include, under all of its specific objectives, dedicated support to dissemination (including through open access to research results), communication and dialogue actions, with a strong emphasis on communicating results to end- users, citizens, civil society organisations, industry and policy makers. To this extent, Horizon 2020 may make use of networks for information transfer. Communication activities undertaken in the context of Horizon 2020 will also seek to raise public awareness on the importance of research and innovation by means of publications, events, knowledge repositories, databases, websites or a targeted use of social media. In order to simplify the access to information and to develop an instrument with all the information demanded by the research community and, having regard the need for a transparency, Cordis, as a digital instrument should be revised and reformed in a more clear and flexible way.
source: PE-492.557
2012/06/26
ENVI
1 amendments...
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a decision Annex 1 – point 5 – point 5.1 – point 5.1.3 a (new) 5.1.3 a. It is essential to study the regional impacts of climate change on the ecosystem, water resources, agriculture and forestry, in order to analyse its impact on human life, health and other socio- economic issues, but also to investigate direct and indirect influence of global change on the dynamics and capacity of ecosystem.
source: PE-492.615
2012/07/17
ITRE
1 amendments...
Amendment 889 #
Proposal for a decision Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6 – point 6.1 – point 6.1.1 – paragraph 1 a (new) The major societal challenges are not abstract, they have a territorial dimension. Moreover according to the importance of the urban problematic in terms of creativity, innovation, social, economic, cultural and environmental issues, there is a need for a specific consideration.
source: PE-492.826
|
| 24 |
2011/0409(COD) Sound level of motor vehicles
2012/06/13
ENVI
14 amendments...
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital must be ensured. To that end a comprehensive Union type-approval system for motor vehicles is in place. The technical requirements for the type- approval of motor vehicles and their exhaust systems with regard to permissible sound levels should be harmonised to avoid the adoption of requirements that differ from one Member State to another and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while, at the same time, providing for a high level of environmental protection and public safety. The Commission should also undertake an impact assessment regarding the labelling conditions applicable to air and noise pollution levels. This impact assessment should take into consideration the different types of vehicles covered by this Regulation (including electric vehicles) as well as the effect that such labelling could have on the car industry. In fact, while such labelling could be considered a useful tool for raising awareness among consumers and protecting their rights as regards transparency prior to the purchase of a vehicle, it could seriously and adversely affect the car industry on cost grounds. The impact assessment should therefore evaluate the cost- effectiveness of this tool.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) This Regulation should therefore introduce a different method in relation to the compulsory one of Directive 70/157/EEC. That method should be based on the method published by the UNECE Working Party on Noise (GRB) in 2007 which incorporated a 2007 version of the standard ISO 362. The results of monitoring of both the old and the new test methods were submitted to the Commission. Furthermore, in order to overcome the shortcomings inherent in the previous test method, the Commission should, within 24 months of the entry into force of this Regulation, submit an impact assessment to the European Parliament and to the Council on the effective contribution of tyre rolling equipment in reducing the noise level of vehicles, focussing on the road surface impact, and the research needs in this specific field, in view of adopting a new European test method which also takes into account road surface behaviour.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) This Regulation should also further reduce noise limits. It should take account of Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor , which introduced new stricter noise requirements for motor vehicle tyres and which underlined the need for a coherent and comprehensive approach to addressing the problem of road noise, including taking into account the contribution of "silent" road surfaces and noise reducing materials in mitigating the road traffic sound level. This horizontal approach will more efficiently reduce the overall road traffic noise compared to a sectoral and vertical approach. Studies highlighting the annoyance and health effects from road traffic noise, and the associated costs and benefits should also be heeded.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8a (new) (8a) The Commission should publish "silent" road guidelines, addressed to road authorities in order to provide them with a useful tool to comply with requirements for more sustainable road infrastructure.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The environmental benefits expected from hybrid electric and pure electric road transport vehicles have resulted in a substantial reduction of the noise emitted by such vehicles. This has resulted in the removal of an important source of audible signal that is used by blind and low vision pedestrians and cyclists, amongst other road users, to become aware of the approach, presence or departure of these vehicles. For that purpose, industry is developing acoustic systems to compensate for this lack of audible signal in electric and hybrid electric vehicles. The performance of approaching vehicle audible systems fitted to vehicles should be harmonised. The fitting of such systems should however, remain an option at the discretion of vehicle manufacturers. The adequate audibility of electric cars should be assured by a minimum noise level - not only with regard to public health and road safety but also with respect to particularly vulnerable groups such as pedestrians and people with disabilities.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 This Regulation shall apply to vehicles of categories M1, M2, M3, N1, N2 and N3, as defined in Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC and to the systems, components and separate technical units designed and constructed for such vehicles. Vehicles produced in small series in accordance with section 1 of Part A of Annex XII to Directive 2007/46/EC must comply with all parts of this Regulation, except Article 8 and Article 9.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) ‘vehicle type’ means
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (new) c) if the manufacturer is an independent small volume car manufacturer within the meaning of paragraph 1 to 3 of Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the Community's integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles1, and tests with an approved testing facility the static noise value of vehicles to allow for in use testing. The manufacturer shall also submit a report to the Commission setting out measures it has taken or plans to take to reduce noise emissions, in line with its reduction potential and consistent with the characteristics of the market segments concerned. _______________ 1 OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 1.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 b (new) Article 4b Monitoring Member States shall, in accordance with Regulation EC (No) 765/2008, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/931, guarantee effective monitoring of their market. They shall carry out appropriate checks on the characteristics of products on an adequate scale, in accordance with the principles set out in Article 19(1) of Regulation 765/2008. _______________ 1 OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph - 1 (new) -1. The testing conditions laid down in Annex II should take into account typical on-road driving conditions and the testing requirements of other essential components of the vehicle, which have already been covered by applicable EU legislation, and in particular by Regulation (EC) No 661/2009.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 The sound level measured in accordance with the provisions of Annex II
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraphs 1 a and 1 b (new) 1a. Vehicles shall automatically meet the requirements of Annex X if the vehicle manufacturer submits to the type- approval authority technical documents showing the difference between the maximum and minimum engine speed of the vehicles at BB'17 ≤ 0,15 x S, for any test condition inside the ASEP control range defined in point 3.3. of Annex VIII with respect to the conditions set out in Annex II. 1b. Vehicles of category N1 are exempted from ASEP if one of the following conditions is met: (a) Engine capacity ≤ 660 ccm and power- to-mass ratio PMR calculated by using the maximum authorised vehicle mass ≤ 35; (b) Payload ≥ 850 kg and power-to-mass ratio PMR calculated by using the maximum authorised vehicle mass ≤ 40.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) 2a. Vehicles of category N1 are exempted from ASEP if one of the following conditions is fulfilled: (a) The engine capacity is not exceeding 660 ccm and the power-to-mass ratio PMR calculated by using the maximum authorised vehicle mass is not exceeding 35; The payload is at least 850 kg and the power-to-mass ratio PMR calculated by using the maximum authorised vehicle mass is not exceeding 40;
source: PE-491.112
2012/12/06
ENVI
10 amendments...
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 5.2.2. a (new) 5.2.2.a The limit values set forth in the table in Annex III apply with a reasonable tolerance margin during measurement.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II - point 3.2.2. 3.2.2. Tyre rolling sound emissions are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 on the general safety of motor vehicles. The tyres to be used for the test shall be representative for the vehicle and shall be selected by the vehicle manufacturer and recorded in Appendix 3 to Annex I of this Regulation. They shall correspond to one of the tyre sizes designated for the vehicle as original equipment. The tyre is or will be commercially available on the market at the same time as the vehicle. 2/ The tyres shall be inflated to the pressure recommended by the vehicle manufacturer for the test mass of the vehicle. The tyres shall have
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – point 3.2.2. – footnote 2/ 2/ Given that the tyre contribution for overall sound emission is significant, regard must be had for existing regulatory provisions concerning tyre/road sound emissions. Traction tyres, snow tyres and special-use tyres shall be excluded during type-approval- and conformity of production measurements at the request of the manufacturer in accordance with UNECE
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex VII – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part In addition to the requirements set out under points 1 to 3.2.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex VII – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part In addition to the requirements set out under points 1 to 3.2.2, the following requirements
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex VII – point 2 – footnote 1 1/For the first five years after the entry into force of this Regulation, manufacturers may either use test tracks certified according to ISO 10844:1994 or ISO 10844:2011. After that date manufacturers shall use test tracks complying with ISO 10844:2011 only.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex VIII – point 2.3. – line 4 'Vehicle acceleration' Vehicle acceleration awot ASEP: awot ≤
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex VIII – paragraph 2.4. –paragraph 3 (new) In order for the ASEP test to be representative and repeatable (to the Type Approval Authority), the vehicles shall be tested using production gearbox calibration.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex X – point 5.2.1.1. 5.2.1.1 The noise test of the silencing system and the replacement silencing system has to be executed with the
source: PE-491.113
|
| 70 |
2011/2012(INI) Analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage
2011/01/04
ENVI
19 amendments...
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Calls the Commission in the framework of its actions to mitigate climate change, to develop fast action regulating strategies with a view to accelerate the phase-out of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), and recover and destroy stratospheric ozone depleting GHGs in discarded products and equipment.
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new) 18c. Calls the Commission in the framework of its actions to mitigate climate change, to develop fast-action strategies with a view to reduce emissions of Black Carbon, giving priority to emissions that affect regions of snow and ice, including the Arctic
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 d (new) 18d. Calls the Commission in the framework of its actions to mitigate climate change, to develop fast-action regulating strategies with a view to reduce pollutant gases that lead to formation of tropospheric (lower atmosphere) ozone, a significant GHG
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Takes into account that the Commission Communication on a Roadmap for moving towards a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 emphasises the need to remain attentive to the risk of carbon leakage in order to ensure a level playing field.
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Takes into account that, as by Council Conclusions of 14 March 2011, Member States have reiterated the importance of ensuring the continuation of existing flexible mechanisms, while improving them, and establishing new sectoral or other scaled-up market-based mechanisms at the Durban Climate Conference in order to enhance the cost- effectiveness of, and to promote, mitigation actions while contributing to sustainable development.
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Considers that the Commission Communication on a Roadmap for moving towards a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 emphasises that the development of sectoral policy options will have to go into greater depth on costs, trade-offs and uncertainties. 1 __________________ 1 Roadmap 2050 pag. 6
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Takes into account the need to carry out an in-depth analysis of the cumulative costs of climate objectives in terms of carbon prices, energy prices and expenditure for innovation and research.
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 c (new) 19c. Following the public debt crisis as a consequence of the financial crisis that has hit Europe, Member States will have to reduce excess debt of 1/20 each year. This means that there will be less public funds for investments to promote innovation and growth.
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers that
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Notes that in the EU analysis of options to reduce greenhouse gas emission, the case is not how to create more ‘green jobs’ by subsidising non- efficient (after carbon pricing is taken into consideration) installations for renewables but how to create ‘defendable jobs’ which will stand the competition test posed by the emerging global players; Where the relevant equipment for some renewable sources is increasingly manufactured in China and India, Europe should now invest more in energy efficiency which will strengthen local economies by supporting local jobs that cannot leak to third countries with lower cost of production
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Concurs with the European Commission’s Roadmap for a low carbon economy by 2050 where it states that ‘the creation and preservation of jobs will depend on the EU's ability to lead in terms of the development of new low carbon technologies through increased education, training, programmes to foster acceptability of new technologies, R&D and entrepreneurship, as well as favourable economic framework conditions for investments’
Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Notes the lack of a thorough assessment of the impacts on employment caused by the low carbon transition which would primarily entail a shift of jobs across sectors, and that there is a need to better identify ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ of such transition.
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Emphasises that the co-benefits of emissions reductions o
Amendment 314 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Concludes that stepping up to a 30% target has more benefits than costs for EU citizens
Amendment 332 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Notes that the Commission has fully acknowledged that the best protection against the risk of carbon leakage would be effective global action. 1 __________________ 1 COM(2011)0112, p. 9
Amendment 333 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27b. Notes that the Commission has fully acknowledged that there is a need to remain vigilant in order to maintain a strong industrial base in Europe.1 __________________ 1 COM(2011)0112, p. 9
Amendment 353 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Concurs with the Commission analysis that border adjustment measures or including imports in the ETS would need to be combined with full auctioning to the sectors concerned; considers that such a system could be envisaged especially for some standardised commodities, such as steel or cement
Amendment 361 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Stresses that over-ambitious EU targets without commensurate international collaboration may harm the competitivess of EU industry and lead to carbon leakage across EU borders;
source: PE-462.704
2011/02/05
ENVI
18 amendments...
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Reiterates that cumulative emissions are decisive for the climate system; notes that even with a pathway of 30% reductions in 2020, 55% in 2030, 75% in 2040 and 90% in 2050 the EU would still be responsible for approximately double its per capita share o
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Recalls that the EU with little more than 10% of global emissions will not be able to tackle climate change on its own.
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that delaying global and European climate action would result in higher costs for achieving the 2050 target due to stranded investment in high-carbon capital stock and slower technological learning;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes that we have to take in consideration the different economic assessment in different Member States and sectors; recognizes that a too fast acceleration in emission reduction would lead to a lock - in of more efficient but still carbon intensive technologies.
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that, according to the 2010 Commission analysis, the surplus of allowances in the ETS
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that, according to the Commission analysis, the surplus of allowances in the ETS
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that, according to the Commission analysis, the surplus of allowances in the ETS due mainly to the economic crisis will correspond to around 2.4 billion banked allowances and unused international credits in 2020;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that the fuel switching towards cleaner fuels and private investment in green technologies depends
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that, due to
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that, due to the
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Recalls that the Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 confirms the EU's offer in the international negotiations to take on a 30% reduction target for 2020, if the conditions are right. Recalls that, according to the Commission analysis, stepping up to the 30% reduction target with 25% domestic effort now represents an increase of EUR 11 billion as compared to 2008 projections for the absolute costs of the climate and energy package in 2020;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Recognises that the economic crises has reduced the ability of the EU economy to invest in low carbon technologies;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Notes that the Commission Communication of May 2010 is no longer valid because it does not take into account the last two years of events into the Member States and at global level.
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes the option of implementing the change in the ETS through cancelling allowances assigned for auctioning;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Considers for encouraging investments in new technologies by the private sector, it is essential to maintain the stability of the legal and economic framework where industries shall operate. A disruption in the current framework would generate uncertainties in the decision-making process and also negatively affect possible investments in this sector.
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Deplores the lack of measures to capture the negative-cost greenhouse gas reduction potential in energy and resource efficiency where achievable; calls for strict application of the least lifecycle cost principle in implementing measures under the Eco-
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Takes into account that the Commission Communication on a Roadmap for moving towards a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 emphasises the need to safeguard the competitiveness of European industry (i.e. implement a cost-effective path to maximise benefits for EU manufacturing and to maximise benefits for EU).
source: PE-462.703
2011/03/31
ENVI
33 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new) - having regard to the Commission Communication ‘A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’(COM(2011)0112),
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 b (new) - having regard to the Commission Communication "A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy by 2050"(COM(2011)0112), and the statement that “The EU already has legislation in place that ensures a 20% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 compared with 1990 levels. It maintains its conditional offer of a 30% reduction, provided there are comparable reductions by other developed countries and appropriate contributions from developing countries.”
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 b (new) - having regard to the Commission Communication on Energy Efficiency Plan 2011(COM(2011)0109),
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) - having regard to Council Conclusions of June 2010 agreeing that the Commission should “conduct more detailed analysis on the policy options and costs and benefits, including at Member State level, as appropriate."
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the EU's climate objective is to limit climate change to 2°C above the pre- industrial level; whereas the climate package adopted in December 2008 represents a first step towards ensuring EU action in line with this objective; whereas countries representing some 80% of global emissions have pledged to reduce emissions, although the Parties to the UNFCCC acknowledged in Cancun that current pledges are insufficient to meet the 2°C objective
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the EU's and global climate objective is to limit climate change to 2°C above the pre-
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas, according to the European Environmental Agency, in 2009 the EU's greenhouse gas emissions were 17.3% lower than in 1990; however stresses that this includes the effect of the economic crisis,
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas, according to the European Environmental Agency, in 2009 the EU's greenhouse gas emissions were 17.3% lower than in 1990, due to the effects of the economic crisis.
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the International Energy Agency has estimated that the EU's share of the global emissions was 13% in 2010 and will be 9% in 2030,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas action by the EU alone will not be enough to combat climate change,
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas, due to the economic crisis,
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas, due to the economic crisis, emissions from sectors in the EU emissions trading system (ETS) have been considerably lower than projected, and below the level of initial allocation, but also the investment ability of these sectors has been reduced at the same time.
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the general objective of the Emissions Trading Directive (2003/87/EC) is to promote reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in a cost- effective and economically efficient manner in order to combat climate change,
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the temporary lower carbon price will have a
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the lower carbon price w
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. considering that the main purpose of the climate and energy package is that of reducing emission in the most cost effective way.
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, according to the Commission, stepping up effort to 30% while the other countries retain their low pledges would have a limited incremental impact on the EU's energy intensive industry, as long as the adequate energy efficiency measures are deployed and the special measures for industry stay in place
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F d (new) Fd. whereas the European Union’s credibility would be enhanced if an intermediate step was first taken and, at the same time, legislation was adopted that mapped out the specific path to be followed if the international situation further improved;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas in the absence of a global agreement assuring a level playing field, European industry would be still exposed to unfair competition.
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) F a. whereas without a global agreement and the cooperation of major CO2 producers (USA, China, India) the EU cannot succeed in having any influence at all on the climate changes currently occurring;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. notes however that the Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 does not suggest to set new 2020 targets and on the contrary states that " the priority remains to achieve all the targets already set for 2020".
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the Council, to use every means possible to achieve a global agreement;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Welcomes the Commission Communication on the 2050 Roadmap setting long-term targets reconfirming the EU objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95% by 2050 in order to keep climate change below 2°C.
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls for the Commission based on Communication on the 2050 Roadmap to come forward with proposals to move to a
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Confirms that if the conditions agreed upon by the European Council are met, the EU will consider all possible options that can help to reach 25% target for 2020 in a cost-effective way.
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission in this regard to work towards a structural overhaul of EU climate diplomacy which, through the involvement of the new European External Action Service and the High Representative, should seek to present a clearer EU profile on climate policy, bringing a new dynamic to the international climate negotiations and encouraging partners throughout the world to also introduce binding reductions in emissions;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Points out that the EU’s main priority should be to convince other partners in the world of the merits of making their own commitments on reductions that may even exceed those set out in the Copenhagen Agreement;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that, according to IPCC 4AR
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the European Council in February 2011 has recognised that further reductions in the range of 80-95% by 2050 as compared to 1990 are necessary;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recognizes that a cost - effective approach to long - term targets foresees a non - linear pathway with a 25% target in 2020, a 40% target in 2030, a 60% target in 2040 to a 80% target in 2050.1 __________________ 1 Roadmap 2050
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that the European Council is not in favour of stepping up to a 30% reduction target without the participation of developed countries and other major emitters of greenhouse gases in an ambitious international agreement on climate change;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Recalls that in the Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 the Commission indicates that progress an a global scale is the only way to solve the problem of climate change, and the EU must continue to engage its partners.1 __________________ 1 COM(2011)0112, p. 13
source: PE-462.566
|
| 1 |
2011/2056(INI) Effective Raw Materials Strategy for Europe
2011/05/30
ENVI
1 amendments...
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and targets for EU economic growth, make the decoupling of growth from raw material use even more essential;
source: PE-466.974
|
| 2 |
2011/2072(INI) Facing the challenge of the safety of offshore oil and gas activities
2011/05/23
ENVI
2 amendments...
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to review the relevant legislation with a view to introducing a ban on offshore exploration and drilling in waters less than 80 kilometres away from marine national parks and nature reserves;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Calls on the Commission to take due account, when assessing the impact of offshore projects, of the adverse impact that offshore hydrocarbon activities have on tourism in the areas affected;
source: PE-465.013
|
| 9 |
2011/2148(INI) Towards a space strategy for the European Union that benefits its citizens
2011/06/10
ENVI
9 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the importance of the GMES programme and its potential contribution to achievement of the 'Europe 2020' objectives by indicating how to combat climate change and providing background information on the green economy and investment in technology and infrastructures;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Acknowledges the current utilisation of the GMES emergency management programme in practice, particularly in response to floods or humanitarian disasters;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Stresses that the GMES programme is not only infrastructural in nature but also targeted at environmental protection and safety systems; these are the priorities of the European Union and all Member States strongly committed to environmental policy;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that the costs relating to GMES are already covered until 2013, totalling EUR 3 billion (approximately EUR 2.3 billion for the satellites and EUR 700 million for related services) and that it is estimated that the programme’s operational maintenance costs for the period 2014 - 2020 will average EUR 850 million per year;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the adequate use of space programmes would lead to significant savings for the sectors involved, especially EU environment policy;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Acknowledges the social benefits to users of GMES services, for whom continuity and sustainability are of the essence if they are to derive maximum advantage from the observation infrastructures offered by the programme;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Reiterates that inclusion of GMES funding in the 2014 - 2020 multiannual financial framework would save wasting investment to date in the seventh framework programme of research in the field of services and information.
source: PE-473.827
|
| 5 |
2012/0191(COD) Reducing CO2 emissions from new light commercial vehicles: modalities for reaching the 2020 target
2013/02/28
ENVI
5 amendments...
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 Article 1– paragraph 2 2. From 2020, this Regulation sets a target of 147 g CO2/km for the average emissions of new light commercial vehicles registered in the Union as measured in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2007
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 Article 5 (2a) Article 5 is replaced by the following: "Article 5 Super-credits In calculating the average specific emissions of CO2, each new light commercial vehicle with specific emissions of CO2 of less than 50 g CO2 /km or 50% of the value given by its specific emission target shall be counted as: — 3,5 light commercial vehicles in 2014, — 3,5 light commercial vehicles in 2015, — 2,5 light commercial vehicles in 2016, — 2 light commercial vehicles from 2017."
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 3 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 Article 12 – paragraph 1 (3a) Article 12, paragraph (1) is replaced by the following: "1. Upon application by a supplier or a manufacturer, CO2 savings achieved through the use of innovative technologies or a combination of innovative technologies ("innovative technology package") shall be considered. The total contribution of those technologies to reducing the specific emissions target of a manufacturer may be up to 7 g CO2/km."
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 3 b (new) Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part (3 b) Article 12(2), the introductory part is replaced by the following: "The Commission shall adopt detailed provisions for a procedure to approve such innovative technologies or the innovative technology package by 31 December 2013. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 14(2) of this Regulation. Those detailed provisions shall be in accordance with the provisions established by Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, and be based on the following criteria for innovative technologies:"
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 – point a Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 Article 13 – paragraph 1 By
source: PE-506.129
|
| 6 |
2012/0266(COD) Medical devices
2013/05/14
ENVI
6 amendments...
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Where no harmonised standards exist
Amendment 758 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 97 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) Article 25(2) and (3) and Article 45(4) shall apply from [18 months after date of application referred to in paragraph 2] provided that the relevant electronic system has been validated and in operation;
Amendment 777 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part II – point 9 – point 9.2 Amendment 857 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 7 – part III – point 6 – point 6.9 Amendment 861 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 8 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point a (a) The notified body shall audit the quality management system to determine whether it meets the requirements referred to in Section 3.2.
source: PE-510.766
|
Salvatore TATARELLA on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
Term 6 20.07.2004 - 13.07.2009
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |