Stanimir ILCHEV
Constituencies
-
Bulgaria
National Movement for Stability and Progress
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
Bulgaria
National Movement Simeon II
2007/01/01 - 2007/06/05
Groups
-
ALDE
Member
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Constitutional Affairs | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Contact
Online
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45567
- Fax
- +322 28 49567
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 09G258
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75567
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79567
- Office
- Bât. Winston Churchill M02031
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- European Parliament
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 09G258
- B-1047 Brussels
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2012/2308(INI) | Location of the seats of the European Union's institutions |
| Responsible | 2012/2080(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 181 and 182: verbatim reports; audiovisual record of proceedings |
| Shadow | 2012/0332(NLE) | EU/Armenia Agreement: readmission of persons residing without authorisation |
| Shadow | 2012/0237(COD) | European political parties and European political foundations: statute and funding |
| Shadow | 2011/2298(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 70: interinstitutional negotiations in legislative procedures |
| Responsible | 2011/2168(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 48(2): own-initiative reports |
| Shadow | 2011/2152(ACI) | Interinstitutional Agreement on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management 2014-2020 (replacing Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006) |
| Shadow | 2010/2042(ACI) | Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on cooperation in budgetary matters 2007-2013 |
Born
1953/07/31 Burgas- Bachelor and Master's degree in journalism from St Clement of Ohrid University, Sofia (1979).
- Editor for Bulgarian National Television (1979-1981); editor of the journal 'Krile' ('Wings') (1981-1985) and of the magazine 'Mladezh' ('Youth') (1994). Director of the PR and media relations department of the American University in Bulgaria (1994-2001).
- Member of the political council of National Movement Simeon II (NDSV); spokesman for the NDSV.
- MP in the 39th and 40th National Assemblies; chair of the Committee on foreign policy, defence and security (2001-2003); chairman of the NDSV parliamentary group (2003-2005); member and vice-chair of the Committee on defence (2005-2009).
- Observer in the European Parliament (2005-2007). Member of the European Parliament (since 2007)
- Chair of the Bulgarian delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2001-2005).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 16 |
2009/2241(INI) Institutional aspects of accession by the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
2010/03/25
AFCO
16 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 – having regard to Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union, Article
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 3 – accession will contribute to the harmonious development of the case law of the two European courts in the field of human rights, particularly because of the increased need for dialogue, and thus will create an integral system, in which the two courts will function in synchrony,
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 3 a (new) – accession will also compensate to some extent for the fact that the scope of the Court of Justice is somewhat constrained in the matters of foreign and security policy and police and security policy by providing useful external judicial supervision of all EU activities,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, pursuant to Article 2 of Protocol No 8 to the Lisbon Treaty, the agreement on the accession of the Union to the ECHR must not affect the particular domestic situation of the Member States in relation to the ECHR and its protocols in general and with regard to any derogations and reservations made by Member States in particular, and that such circumstances have no effect on the distinctive legal position of the Union in relation to the ECHR;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Observes that the ECHR system has been supplemented by a series of additional protocols concerning the protection of rights which are not covered by the ECHR and suggests that
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – – the right to submit a list of three candidates for the post of judge, one of whom is elected by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on behalf of the Union and participates in the work of the Court on a
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 2 – the
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Suggests that the panel established under Article 255 TFEU for the selection of members of the Court of Justice and General Court could also be used for the nomination of EU judges to the European Court of Human Rights;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that the Member States should
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers it appropriate that, in the interests of the proper administration of justice, in any case brought against a Member State before the European Court of Human Rights which may raise an issue concerning the law of the Union, the Union may, after
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Is clearly aware of the fact that the European Court on Human Rights may find a violation in a case that has already been decided by the ECJ and stresses that this would in no way cast a doubt on ECJ's credibility as an ultimate umpire in the EU judicial system;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that the ECHR has an important function in connection with the interpretation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as rights guaranteed by the Charter which
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Is aware that accession as such will not resolve the extremely serious problems facing the ECHR system, namely on the one hand the excessive workload due to an exponential increase in the number of individual applications and on the other hand the reform of the structure and functioning of the Court to cope with it; whereas the European Court on Human Rights recognises the fact that it operates in a complex legal and political environment; notes that, in the absence of a solution to these problems, the system is in danger of collapse and that the entry into force of Protocol No 14
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Considers it essential to maintain the independence of the European Court of Human Rights in terms of personnel and budgetary policy;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Encourages the national parliaments of the EU Member States to clearly express their will and readiness to facilitate the accession process by involving their national courts and Ministries of Justice;
source: PE-440.010
|
| 14 |
2010/0074(COD) Citizens' initiative
2010/11/16
AFCO
14 amendments...
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) It is necessary to establish the minimum number of Member States from which
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) For that purpose, it is also appropriate to establish the minimum number of citizens coming from each of those Member States. In order to ensure
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) It is appropriate to provide that, where a citizens' initiative has received the necessary statements of support from signatories
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The Commission should examine a citizens' initiative and set out its
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 1 1. "Citizens
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 2 2. "Signatories
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. In order to be eligible to support a proposed citizens' initiative, signatories shall be
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The signatories of a citizens' initiative shall come from at least
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. In
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) aa. receive the organisers at an appropriate level to allow them to explain in detail the matters raised by the initiative;
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new) ab. consider the organisation of a public hearing on the subject-matter of the initiative, to which the European Parliament, through its responsible committee, may be invited to participate;
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b b.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) ba. present a legislative proposal within one year or include the proposal in its next year's Work Programme. If the Commission does not so act it shall give the organisers as well as the European Parliament a detailed explanation.
source: PE-452.836
|
| 2 |
2010/0802(COD) European Protection Order. Initiative Belgium, Bulgaria, Estonia, Spain, France, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Finland and Sweden
2010/07/19
LIBE, FEMM, LIBE, FEMM
2 amendments...
Amendment 122 #
Draft directive Article - 1 (new) Amendment 126 #
Draft directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1) “European protection order” means a
source: PE-445.751
|
| 6 |
2010/0817(COD) European Investigation Order in criminal matters. Initiative Belgium, Bulgaria, Estonia, Spain, Austria, Slovenia and Sweden
2012/10/02
LIBE
6 amendments...
Amendment 90 #
Draft directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The EIO may be issued
Amendment 91 #
Draft directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 93 #
Draft directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 94 #
Draft directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 95 #
Draft directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 106 #
Draft directive Article 6 – paragraph 6 6. All difficulties concerning the transmission or authenticity of any document needed for the execution of the EIO shall be dealt with by direct contacts between the issuing and executing authorities involved or, where appropriate, with the involvement of the central authorities of the Member States. The executing authority shall verify the authenticity of the EIO and competence of the issuing authority.
source: PE-480.869
|
| 8 |
2010/2201(INI) Application of Regulation 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding
2011/03/03
AFCO
8 amendments...
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the European Union shall function according to the principle of "representative democracy" as stated in Article 10(4) of the Treaty on European Union,
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the amending Regulation of 20071 is targeted on improving the integration process of the European political parties by favouring better structuring and organising of the political parties within the Union,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas organisational and functional convergence and improving the funding process can be accomplished only by adopting a uniform and common legal European statute for all
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that political parties – and their linked political foundations and political institutions – work in a parliamentary democracy as ‘conveyer belts’, helping to shape the political will of citizens, participating in the management of political and social relations, drawing up political programmes, training and selecting candidates, maintaining the dialogue with citizens and enabling citizens to express their views;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that political parties have rights and responsibilities and should therefore have organisational uniformity; considers that this organisational convergence can be achieved
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that political parties have rights and responsibilities and should therefore
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Points out that political parties have rights, obligations and responsibilities and should therefore have organisational uniformity; considers that this organisational convergence can be achieved only by establishing a common political, legal and fiscal status for the European political parties;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Subtitle 1 a (new) (to be introduced just before paragraph 12) Statute and legal personality of the European parties and foundations – dimensions and prospects
source: PE-460.695
|
| 4 |
2010/2276(INI) EU strategy on Roma inclusion
2011/01/17
LIBE
4 amendments...
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the EU has developed a range of useful tools to foster the inclusion of Roma, but these are scattered across policy areas and their effect remains limited and is hard to measure,
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas non-discrimination - although indispensable - is not by itself enough to overcome the historic disadvantages of the Roma, and whereas it is therefore necessary to complement equality legislation and policies by addressing both the specific and the usual needs of the Roma regarding the fulfilment of and access to their human rights to employment, housing, healthcare and education by means of an EU-level strategy,
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point b – indent 3 a (new) - protection of the spouses and the children of mixed marriages,
Amendment 296 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 2 – distance from city centres or problematic over-concentration quite close to the city centres,
source: PE-456.648
|
| 5 |
2010/2311(INI) EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: main achievements and future challenges
2011/02/05
LIBE
5 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A (new) -A. whereas the fight against terrorism remains a top priority for the EU, as number of attacks take place on Europe's territory every year,
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas after the atrocious attacks of 11 September 2001 the first decade of the 21st century has been marked by the ‘War on Terrorism’, especially with regard to the US approach; whereas although these attacks did not take place on European soil, all Europeans felt them to be an attack on their values and their way of life,
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) G a. whereas terrorist groups have increased their international cooperation; whereas with the constantly developing web-based technologies there is a need of a new system of technological measures to prevent using internet as an easy tool for communication between terrorist groups,
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point d a (new) d a. include results from monitoring the major actions of the anti-terrorist structures in the Member States and examine whether these actions really reciprocate emerging threats or ambiguously serve short-term internal political purposes;
source: PE-464.701
|
| 12 |
2011/0154(COD) Judicial cooperation in criminal matters: right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and right to communicate upon arrest
2012/03/22
LIBE
12 amendments...
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that suspects and accused persons are promptly granted access to a lawyer
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) before the start of any questioning by the
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) upon the carrying out of any procedural or evidence-gathering act
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point с (c) from the outset of deprivation of liberty
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point с а (new) (ca) during any questioning;
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point с b (new) (cb) from the moment the person is summoned to appear before a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters, in connection with the occurrence of the earliest of any of the events listed in this paragraph. Upon the occurrence of any of these events, the suspect or accused person shall be provided with written information on their rights. This shall be certified in accordance with the recording procedures laid down in the law of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The suspect or accused person shall have the right to meet privately with the lawyer representing him.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The lawyer shall have the right to be present at any
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. The lawyer shall have the right to be present at any other investigative or evidence-gathering act
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 Member States shall ensure in all circumstances that the confidentiality of all meetings between
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. The waiver and the circumstances in which it was given shall be recorded in accordance with the law of the Member State concerned. Member States shall ensure that no waiver is given to the right to a lawyer where the suspect or accused person is a minor.
source: PE-486.050
|
| 5 |
2011/0167(NLE) EU/Australia, Canada, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and United States Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)
2012/05/21
LIBE
5 amendments...
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines, at the same time, that it is crucial to strike the appropriate balance between enforcement of IPRs and fundamental rights such as freedom of expression, the right to privacy and protection of personal data
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Considers that when fundamental rights are at stake
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Shares the concerns expressed by the EDPS in its opinion on ACTA, notably in relation to the unclear scope, the vague notion of "competent authority", the processing of personal data by ISPs through voluntary enforcement cooperation measures and the lack of appropriate safeguards in relation to fundamental rights;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Is of the opinion that ACTA does not comply with the rights enshrined in the Charter;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 c (new) 15c. Invites the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to recommend that Parliament declines to consent to the conclusion of ACTA;
source: PE-489.544
|
| 13 |
2011/0217(COD) European Year of Citizens (2013)
2012/02/23
LIBE
4 amendments...
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Citizens of Roma origin are often targeted by Member States for expulsion, in violation of the Free Movement Directive and of the Race Directive, and subjected to collective expulsion procedures, such as in the case of France in 2010. Roma integration and inclusion is still pending issue in the EU agenda. Member States should start treating Roma minorities equally and deepen their efforts in the areas of unemployment, housing, health, education, free movement, anti- discrimination and fundamental rights. The key to an effective Roma strategy lies in measures focused on the social inclusion of Roma children.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 14 a (new) (14a) Given the large number of Union citizens resident in a Member State other than their own that are not fully and effectively informed about their rights it is of great importance that Member States should focus their efforts in enhancing their information systems especially in areas in which Union citizens initially encounter problems, denial or restriction of their rights deriving from Union citizenship such as residence, work, social rights, health, marital status, consumer rights. A further approach with special informational campaign especially targeting those Union citizens resident in a Member State other than their own shall be implemented.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 14 b (new) (14b) The Council and Member States should make the most of the upcoming European Year of Citizens 2013 to ensure that information campaigns on Union citizenship and the rights connected to it are carried out. The Commission should strengthen its activities of monitoring and support to citizens in combating and overcoming violations of citizens' rights and overcoming them, to ensure that the European Year brings about concrete progress in citizens' lives. There are so many violations of citizens' rights in some Member States, and the procedures involved in enforcing them are so time- consuming, that sometimes those delays constitute a denial of the Union citizen's rights.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 3 – conferences
source: PE-483.550
2012/06/03
AFCO
9 amendments...
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 (2) The entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 (7) In particular, free movement and workers' mobility help addressing the consequences of demographic change on the labour market, while also increasing the employability of people and improving the competitiveness of European industries. The right to work in each Member State is linked to the right of movement and residence and should not be restricted in any way other than through the Treaties; should any restricting measures apply they could only be acceptable if a Member State experiences serious disturbances in its labour market and only for a limited period of time. At the same time, free movement either enables, as an essential condition, or stimulates the exercise by citizens of a broad range of rights available to them under Union law, such as their rights as consumers to access goods and services or their rights as passengers and tourists. Facilitating free movement has therefore the potential to enhance citizens' possibilities to fully benefit from the single market, whilst being a key driver for growth.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 20 (20) In order to optimise the effectiveness and efficiency of the activities envisaged for the year of implementation (2013), it is important to carry out a set of preparatory actions with full respect for Article 49(6) of the Financial Regulation and involve all relevant stakeholders, including Union institutions, civil society organisations, the social partners, national, regional and local administrative bodies, and educational institutions in the planning process.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 The general purpose of the European Year shall be to enhance awareness of the rights attached to Union citizenship,
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 The general purpose of the European Year shall be to enhance awareness of the rights attached to Union citizenship, in order to help citizens make full use of their right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States. In this context, the European Year shall
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 The general purpose of the European Year shall be to enhance awareness of the rights attached to Union citizenship, in order to help citizens make full use of their right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States. In this context, the European Year shall focus, among others, on the opportunities for civic participation and access to rights by Union citizens residing in another Member State than their own, by students, workers, consumers, and providers of goods and services across the Union. Any cross-border debates within the EU shall be in any way encouraged and especially through and in reference to the European Citizen's Initiative
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – to
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 3 – conferences and events involving all relevant stakeholders, including Union institutions, civil society organisations, the social partners, national, regional and local administrative bodies and educational institutions to promote debate and raise awareness of the importance and benefits of the right to free movement and residence and more generally citizens' rights as Union citizens;
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) All initiatives launched for the purpose and within the European Year shall work for the benefit of both EU citizens and EU institutions and bodies, thus increasing mutual understanding and cooperation.
source: PE-483.831
|
| 4 |
2011/0427(COD) European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR)
2012/09/27
LIBE
4 amendments...
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1 a) The practice of travelling in small- sized and unseaworthy vessels has dramatically increased the number of migrants drowning at the southern maritime external borders. EUROSUR should considerably improve the operational and technical ability of the Agency and Member States to detect and track these small vessels, leading in the mid-term to a considerable reduction of the loss of migrants and refugees at sea.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point a (a) ‘situational awareness’ means the ability to monitor, detect, identify, track and understand cross-border activities in order to find reasoned grounds for control measures on the basis of combining new information
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. The Agency shall establish and maintain a European situational picture in order to provide the national coordination centres with information and analysis which is relevant for the protection of the lives of migrants and the prevention of irregular migration and cross-border crime at the external borders of the Member States, as well as for the improvement of the Agency's performance of its tasks.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Onward transmission or other communication of information to third countries that do not have agreements with Member States in the framework of EUROSUR or other third parties shall be prohibited.
source: PE-496.412
|
| 2 |
2011/0436(COD)
2012/09/26
LIBE
2 amendments...
Amendment 41 #
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new) 2a. A special focus shall be given to the Roma´s and other minorities in the EU, in order to facilitate their integration as full- right EU citizens.
Amendment 57 #
Annex 1 – part 1 – paragraph 6 a (new) As full integration of minorities is a permanent goal of the EU, a more constructive approach shall be taken to encourage their political and civic participation.
source: PE-496.548
|
| 16 |
2011/2058(REG)
2012/02/04
AFCO
16 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a decision Recital E E. the majority of adopted written declarations are addressed to the Commission
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision Recital E a (new) Ea. further efforts should be made to involve other Union institutions and bodies as addressees in the process;
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision Recital G G. in light of Parliament's growing
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision Recital H H. written declarations in the current legislature have a
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision Recital I Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision Recital I a (new) Ia. written declarations have a positive impact on Members' work which is directly aimed at their constituencies;
Amendment 44 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 123 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1.
Amendment 49 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 123 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Up to five Members may submit a written declaration of not more than 200 words on a matter falling within the competence of the European Union which does not cover issues that are the subject of an ongoing legislative process. Authorisation shall be given by the President on a case-by-case basis. Written declarations shall be
Amendment 52 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 123 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Up to five Members may submit a written declaration of not more than 200 words on a matter falling within the competence of the European Union which does not cover issues that are the subject of an ongoing legislative process.
Amendment 53 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 123 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Up to five Members may submit a written declaration of not more than 200 words on a matter falling within the competence of the European Union which does not cover issues that are the subject of an ongoing legislative proce
Amendment 56 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 123 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 57 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 123 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Any signature may be withdrawn, either electronically or on the spot, at any time before the end of a period of three months from the entry of the declaration in the register. Such withdrawal shall be allowed only once and as an exception. In such cases the Member concerned shall not be permitted to add his or her signature again.
Amendment 61 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 123 – paragraph 3 3. Where, within three months from its entry in the register, a declaration is signed by a majority of Parliament's component Members, the President shall notify Parliament accordingly and publish the names of the signatories in the minutes and the declaration as a text adopted.
Amendment 63 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 123 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 64 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 123 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. On the basis of a successful written declaration, Parliament shall have a debate on the matter in question at an appropriate time in accordance with its agenda.
Amendment 65 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 123 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. All language versions of a successful written declaration shall be published and stored in a special location on Parliament's website.
source: PE-486.057
|
| 24 |
2011/2182(INI) EU Citizenship Report 2010: dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens’ rights
2011/10/31
AFCO
7 amendments...
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that many EU citizens are still not well informed about their rights as EU citizens; Calls on Member States to make sure that European citizens are informed of the rights attached to EU citizenship – including electoral rights and the membership and founding of political parties – and can benefit fully from them, even as residents of EU Member States other than their own;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on Member States to
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recognises that there are some obstacles preventing EU citizens to fully enjoy their electoral rights when residing in a country different from their own; is aware of the fact that finding a proper balance between exercising individual rights and keeping the common interest is not an easy task; calls on member states to find better solutions for the improvement of the rules governing elections or at least to promote the best procedures wherever they exist in the Union;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recognises the challenge represented by the steady general decrease in voter participation in European elections; points out that even though more EU citizens of voting age are resident not in their Member State of origin but in another Member State, proportionally fewer citizens are registered to vote in European elections; calls on member states to find better solutions for the improvement of the rules governing elections;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Points out that apart from common principles
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on Member States to ensure that the publication of European Parliament election results takes place at the same time throughout the whole EU avoiding the risk that the outcome in one member state may influence voting in others;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Notes that in some member states there are different restrictions which make it difficult for nationals of other member states to join existing political parties or found their own party; calls on member states to eradicate such restrictions;
source: PE-475.848
2011/11/18
LIBE
11 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that EU citizenship is the fundamental status of Member States' nationals; underlines th
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is concerned about the situation of stateless persons permanently resident in Member States;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is concerned about the poor implementation
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines that some categories of persons encounter discriminatory obstacles in the exercise of the right to free movement, notably LGBT persons in same-sex unions, transgender people, third country family members and Roma;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Calls the Commission to come up urgently with an ambitious proposal on the full mutual recognition of the effects of civil status documents across the EU so as to finally overcome the legal and administrative obstacles citizens face when moving in the EU, including same- sex spouses, different-sex and same-sex registered partners, or same-sex and different-sex partners in a durable attested relationship and their families, including their children;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Regrets that citizens of Roma origin are often targeted by Member States for expulsion, in violation of the Free Movement Directive and of the Race Directive, and subjected to collective expulsion procedures, such as in the case of France in 2010; underlines that Roma integration and inclusion is still pending issue in the EU agenda and in this regard calls on the Commission to urge Member States to treat Roma minorities equally and deepen their efforts in the areas of unemployment, housing health, education, free movement, anti- discrimination and fundamental rights; urges the Member States especially to focus on social inclusion of the Roma children;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Regrets that a large number of EU citizens resident in a Member State other than their own are not fully and effectively informed about their rights; calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to focus their efforts in enhancing their information systems especially in areas EU citizens initially encounter problems, denial or restriction of their EU rights such as residence, work, social rights, health, marital status, consumer rights;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls on the Commission, the Council and Member States to make the most of the upcoming European Year of Citizenship 2013 so to ensure that information campaigns on European citizenship and the rights connected to it are carried out and calls on the Commission to strengthen its activity of monitoring and support to citizens in facing violations of citizens' rights and overcoming them so to ensure that the European Year allows for concrete progress in citizens' lives;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Regrets that the administrative procedures in some Member States are too time consuming and thus sometimes are equal to a denial of EU citizen's rights; calls on the Commission to be more proactive on infringement procedures in this area ;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes with regret that the Commission has not been
source: PE-475.993
2012/01/20
PETI
6 amendments...
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the EU Citizenship Report 2010, which sets the objective of dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens' rights, and the proposals contained therein; regrets however that many EU citizens are still not well informed about their rights attached to EU citizenship and thus are unable to fully benefit from those rights; calls on the Commission to ensure that the legislative and non-legislative measures provided for in the report are put forward as soon as possible and approved, so as to ensure that EU citizens' rights become effective and that Member States abolish obstacles to the enjoyment of those rights;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that the European Citizens' Initiative (ECI), which will apply from 1 April 2012, constitutes the first instrument of transnational participatory democracy and will give citizens the possibility to become more actively involved in the framing of European policies and legislation; calls
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on those Member States which have decided to introduce or to continue applying transitional arrangements restricting access by Romanian and Bulgarian nationals to their labour markets8
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Recognises that there are some obstacles preventing EU citizens to fully enjoy their electoral rights when residing in a country different from their own; is aware of the fact that finding a proper balance between exercising individual rights and keeping the common interest is not an easy task; calls on member states to find better solutions for the improvement of the rules governing elections or at least to promote the best procedures wherever they exist in the Union;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Recalls the key priority in the Committee on Petitions: to find a solution to the longstanding property concerns in
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22 a. Notes that in some member states there are different restrictions which make it difficult for nationals of other member states to join existing political parties or found their own party; calls on member states to eradicate such restrictions;
source: PE-480.601
|
| 22 |
2011/2191(INI) Application of Croatia to become a member of the European Union
2011/10/13
AFCO
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recognises that the process of enlargement and of deepening EU integration have always gone hand in hand and that, far from adversely affecting the Union’s ability to act, enlargement constituted a catalyst for indispensable institutional changes; underlines, however, that although inspired by and related to the enlargement process all institutional changes have their own reasons and follow their own logic;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that implementation of the internal reforms that Croatia has committed to as part of the accession process must continue once the accession is completed; stresses the importance of increasing public awareness of the goals and mutual advantages of the enlargement, in particular with a view to the constitutionally required referendum, which is to be held in Croatia within 30 days of the date on which the ratification of the Treaty is passed by the Croatian Parliament; notes that precisely because of its importance and the desire for long term positive results the explanatory campaign must not be one- sided and misleading in any way but to clearly point out the benefits and the obligations of the future membership;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that the temporary provisions of the Accession Treaty introduce a derogation from the maximum number of seats in the European Parliament as set in the Treaties until the end of the 2009-2014 parliamentary term; is resolved to present its proposal for the decision determining a new composition of the European Parliament in good time before the 2014 elections, in accordance with Article 14(2) TEU; reminds that al relevant institutional aspects of the accession must be taken into consideration in their entirety;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Invites the Member States to proceed with the ratification of the Accession Treaty with the Republic of Croatia
source: PE-473.951
2011/10/25
AFET
18 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas twenty years after the declaration of its independence and some eight years following the application for EU membership, Croatia marked a historic milestone in
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the accession process has significantly contributed to Croatia’s transformation into a solid and mature democracy based on European values; whereas the prospect of accession acts as a powerful catalyst for reform by mobilising the various actors in political, economic, social and cultural life; whereas reform efforts also need to be sustained beyond the completion of the negotiations and accession in order for the country and its citizens to
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas Croatian membership will make the EU stronger, enrich its European culture and heritage and make an important contribution to maintaining the credibility of the enlargement process, while, at the same time, being a good example of how the conscientious implementation of all commitments taken can lead to the achievement of all predefined goals;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas a true reconciliation between the different peoples and the establishment of good-neighbourly relations
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Croatia’s successful accession would have wider regional implications and give positive impetus to the process of European integration in the Western Balkan region; whereas the prospect of EU membership is a powerful incentive for candidate and potential candidate countries in the region on the path to European integration to pursue the necessary political, economic and legislative reforms and the strengthening of peace, stability and reconciliation based on good- neighbourly relations; whereas the EU should reinforce the European perspective for Croatia’s neighbouring countries and constantly encourage these countries to fulfil their obligations on their own route towards full EU membership;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the conclusion of the accession negotiations with Croatia, bringing to an end almost six years of negotiations and several years of preparations that have significantly altered the country’s socio-political, economic and cultural landscape; stresses the need to keep up the reform momentum and considers that this process is not complete but should continue with the same vigour and hard work after the conclusion of negotiations and beyond accession; expresses its strong confidence in the positive results of this process which will strengthen the support and trust of Croatia’s citizens in EU membership;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Strongly believes that the conclusion of the accession negotiations is proof of the credibility of the EU’s enlargement process; underlines that the progress on the road to membership reflects the fact that accession prospects continue to promote political and economic reforms and that European integration serves as a means of reconciling countries even beyond EU borders;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to closely monitor further preparations for accession with rigour and objectivity and to help the Croatian authorities fulfil their commitments and obligations entered into in the negotiations; is of the view that the pre-accession monitoring mechanism is a way to provide Croatia with additional support in its continued reform efforts;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the need to focus in particular on commitments undertaken in the area of the judiciary, fundamental rights, freedom and security, including the protection of freedom of the media as one of the crucial instruments of democracy, as well as the continued implementation of judicial reform and efficiency, impartial handling of war crimes cases, the fight against corruption, border management, police cooperation, the fight against organised crime, judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters, as well as on commitments in the area of competition policy with a view to the restructuring of the shipbuilding and steel industries;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Underlines the need to focus in particular on commitments undertaken in the area of the judiciary, fundamental rights, freedom and security, including the continued implementation of judicial reform and efficiency, impartial handling of war crimes cases, the fight against corruption, border management, police cooperation, the fight against organised crime, judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters, as well as on commitments in the area of competition policy with a view to the adequate and efficient restructuring of the shipbuilding and steel industries;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers it one of the highest priorities to combat corruption, particularly high- level corruption, corruption at every level of the judiciary, law-enforcement agencies and the public administration, as well as large-scale corruption, which must be pursued with determination at all levels, by rigorous enforcement of the law and successful prosecutions; calls on the Croatian authorities to further strengthen the administrative capacities of anti- corruption bodies by following EU best practice and foster a culture of political accountability;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers it one of the highest priorities to combat corruption, particularly high- level corruption, corruption at every level of the judiciary, law-enforcement agencies and the public administration, as well as large-scale corruption, which must be pursued with determination at all levels, by rigorous enforcement of the law and successful prosecutions; calls on the Croatian authorities to further strengthen the administrative capacities of anti- corruption bodies and foster a culture of political accountability as a prerequisite for building and strengthening the rule of law;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Urges the Croatian Government to continue actively to encourage and support prosecutions for war crimes
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Invites the Government to further encourage
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Encourages the Croatian authorities to continue their efforts to combat discrimination and to enforce the anti- discrimination legislation as well as to address resolutely cases of hate crimes, hate speech, racial threats and intolerance against
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Encourages the Croatian authorities to continue their efforts to combat discrimination and to enforce the anti- discrimination legislation as well as to address resolutely cases of hate crimes, racial threats and intolerance against sexual minorities; further invites Croatia to continue to act in the spirit of tolerance and take appropriate measures
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Invites Croatia to consistently advocate EU enlargement and the promotion of European values of peace, prosperity, freedom, the rule of law, democracy and the social market economy in the region; encourages Croatia to continue to
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for progress in the resolution of outstanding bilateral issues with some neighbouring countries, in particular
source: PE-473.953
|
| 7 |
2011/2246(INI) EU Charter: standard settings for media freedom across the EU
2012/11/28
LIBE
7 amendments...
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 а (new) 3а. Recalls that, according to the European Court of Human Rights, states members must guarantee media pluralism under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Article 10 of that Convention contains provisions similar to those in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which forms part of the Community acquis;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the important role of the public service media, funded by citizens through the State, and their institutional duties to provide high quality and accurate and reliable information; stresses that the private media have similar duties in relation to information, notably of institutional and political nature, in particular on the occasion of elections, referenda, etc; urges the Member States to exempt the independent non-entertainment media from value added tax and to introduce additional/increased taxation for media programmes with a pornographic content;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the important role of the public service media, funded by citizens through the State, and their institutional duties to provide high quality and accurate and reliable information; underlines the importance that this public service does not serve private interests or be influenced by any means from people from the political scene in the member states, or from political groups in third countries; stresses that the private media have similar duties in relation to information, notably of institutional and political nature, in particular on the occasion of elections, referenda, etc;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that media ownership and management should be transparent and not concentrated and that to this end a mandatory Single European Register on media ownership should be created and kept on owners and on the media in order to provide the public with information; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure competition so as to address and prevent dominant positions and guarantee the access of new entrants on the market; calls for rules to ensure that conflicts of interest are properly addressed and resolved; highlights that advertising and sponsoring may cause interference with the editorial line of media;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the importance of annually monitoring media freedom and pluralism in Europe and reporting on a yearly basis on the matter, on the basis of the detailed standards developed by the Council of Europe and the OSCE and of the risk-based analytical approach and indicators developed by the independent study drawn up for the Commission, in liaison with NGOs, stakeholders and experts; believes that the Commission, in cooperation with the Fundamental Rights Agency and/or the EUI Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom, must carry out this task and publish an annual report with the results of that monitoring; believes that the Commission should present that report to the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers and make proposals for any actions and measures arising from its conclusions;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 а (new) 13а. Encourages the Commission and Member States, in the framework of the Commission’s media literacy policy, to pay sufficient attention to the importance of media education, which must provide citizens with the skills of critical interpretation and the ability to sift through the ever-growing volume of information.
source: PE-500.572
|
| 1 |
2011/2266(REG) EP Rules of Procedure: changes in Parliament’s relationship with the European Council and the Eurogroup following entry in force of the Lisbon Treaty
2012/08/02
AFCO
1 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Annex II – part A – point 1 – indent 2 – are of general interest and fall within the overall competence and sphere of responsibility of the
source: PE-480.840
|
| 4 |
2011/2298(REG) EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 70: interinstitutional negotiations in legislative procedures
2012/06/20
AFCO
4 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 70 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The decision on the opening of negotiations at first reading referred to in paragraph 2 shall be translated into all the official languages, transmitted to the President and distributed to all Members of Parliament. It shall be announced by the President at the opening of the part-session following its adoption by the committee responsible and shall be deemed to be approved upon announcement, subject to paragraph 2b.
Amendment 27 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 70 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. A political group or 40 Members may request, or the Conference of Presidents may decide, to include on the agenda of the part-session at which the announcement is to be made a vote on the question whether or not negotiations should be opened on the basis of the mandate included in the committee's decision.
Amendment 31 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 70 – paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. The Conference of Presidents or one third of the component Members of Parliament coming from at least two political groups may request the inclusion on the agenda of a part-session following the announcement referred to in paragraph 2a of a debate followed by a vote on the decision on the opening of negotiations. Amendments to the decision shall be admissible subject to the conditions laid down in Rules 156 and 157.
Amendment 33 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 70 – paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. The negotiating team in the course of an ordinary legislative procedure shall be led by the Chair of the committee responsible or by another member of the team designated by him or her. The negotiating team shall comprise the rapporteur, the shadow rapporteurs and the coordinators. The negotiating team shall regularly report back to the committee responsible on the progress and outcome of the negotiations. After each meeting with the Council and the Commission (trilogue), all drafts considered during that meeting shall be made available to the committee. At its subsequent meeting the committee shall be informed about the state of the negotiations. Where it proves not to be feasible to convene a meeting of the committee in a timely manner, the negotiating team shall report back to the Chair, the shadow rapporteurs and the coordinators of the committee. In that event, the committee shall still be informed about the state of the negotiations at its subsequent meeting. The committee responsible may update the mandate in the light of the progress of the negotiations.
source: PE-492.564
|
| 7 |
2011/2302(REG) EP Rules of Procedure: implementing the European Citizens’ Initiative
2012/03/28
AFCO
7 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
Rule 197 a (new) – paragraphs 1 to 4 (new) Amendment 18 #
Rule 197 a (new) – paragraph 5 (new) 5. If all the requirements are met, the public hearing may be conducted pursuant to the procedure with associated committees in accordance with Rule 50, or the procedure with joint committee meetings in accordance with Rule 51. Rule 50 and Rule 51 shall apply mutatis mutandis. If Rule 50 or Rule 51 applies, the Conference of Committee Chairs may invite the Vice-President of Parliament responsible for matters relating to citizens’ initiatives to chair the public hearing.
Amendment 19 #
Rule 197 a (new) – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. If a conflict arises in relation to the competence of two or more standing committees, it shall be resolved by the Conference of Presidents. The specific conditions laid down in Rule 188(2) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Amendment 21 #
Rule 197 a (new) – paragraph 6 (new) 6. The citizens’ initiative shall be presented, following an invitation from the committee responsible, by a properly represented group of the organisers including members of the citizens’ committee referred to in Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 and/or at least one of the contact persons likewise referred to therein. Any Member wishing to attend the public hearing may do so. The Vice-President of Parliament responsible for matters relating to citizens’ initiatives may deliver an address at the start of the public hearing.
Amendment 22 #
Rule 197 a (new) – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. If appropriate, the presentation shall be followed by an examination of the initiative based on a questionnaire drafted on a case-by-case basis by the committee nominated responsible for conducting the public hearing.
Amendment 23 #
Rule 197 a (new) – paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. In relation to the preparation of the questionnaire, the committee responsible for matters relating to petitions may produce an opinion in accordance with Rule 49. That opinion shall contain guidelines and recommendations on how to thoroughly examine the issue raised in the citizens’ initiative under consideration.
Amendment 27 #
Rule 203 a When Parliament is informed that the Commission has been invited to submit a proposal for a legal act under Article 11(4) of the EU Treaty and in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 211/2011, the
source: PE-486.111
|
| 51 |
2012/0011(COD) Personal data protection: processing and free movement of data (General Data Protection Regulation)
2013/03/04
LIBE
9 amendments...
Amendment 745 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (5)
Amendment 749 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new) (5a) ‘direct controller’ means a person who collects personal data from the data subject or otherwise processes it;
Amendment 750 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new) (5b) ‘indirect controller’ means a person who does not collect personal data from the data subject or otherwise process it.
Amendment 1110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. The controller shall provide any information and any communication relating to the processing of personal data to the data subject in an intelligible and permanent form, using clear and plain language, adapted to the data subject, in particular for any information addressed specifically to a child.
Amendment 1165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new) The data controller directly responsible for the operation shall notify all recipients to whom data from him or her have been passed on of any correction or erasure that has been made or any objection raised under Article 16, 17 or 19. Where recipients of personal data are unknown to the data controller directly responsible for the operation, and this is not due to his or her deliberate act or negligence, he or she shall be exempted from this requirement.
Amendment 1169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 b (new) The data controller indirectly responsible for the operation shall notify all recipients to whom he or she has passed on data of any correction or erasure that has been made or any objection raised under Article 16, 17 or 19, except where they have already been notified in accordance with paragraph 1 above.
Amendment 1170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – subparagraph 1 c (new) The burden of proof of compliance with the above obligations shall rest with the data controllers.
Amendment 1175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.
source: PE-506.146
2013/03/06
LIBE
38 amendments...
Amendment 1209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the
Amendment 1212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) where applicable, t
Amendment 1218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (ha) communications pursuant to Article 13(1).
Amendment 1221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 1227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 3. Where the personal data are
Amendment 1233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 1243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Paragraphs 1
Amendment 1271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 1281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 1287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 1289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 86 for the purpose of regulating the requirements applicable to information referred to in paragraph 1(g), the criteria for the provision of further information referred to in paragraph 1(h) for specific sectors and situations, and the conditions and appropriate safeguards for the exceptions laid down in paragraphs 6(a) and 7(c). In doing so, the Commission shall take the appropriate measures for micro, small and medium- sized-enterprises.
Amendment 1290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. The Commission may lay down standard forms for providing the information referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4, taking into account the specific characteristics and needs of various sectors and data processing situations where necessary. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure set out in Article 87(2).
Amendment 1294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The data subject shall have the right to obtain from
Amendment 1306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the recipients o
Amendment 1425 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.
Amendment 1607 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 4 4. In the cases referred to in paragraph 2,
Amendment 1686 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) keeping the documentation pursuant to Article
Amendment 1747 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 Where a controller determines the purposes, conditions and means of the processing of personal data jointly with others, he and they shall be joint data controllers. Where this regulation does not impose any particular obligations on the data controllers who are directly and indirectly responsible for the operation, the joint controllers shall determine their respective responsibilities for compliance with the obligations under this Regulation, in particular as regards the procedures and mechanisms for exercising the rights of the data subject, by means of an arrangement between them.
Amendment 1757 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 1828 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. Each
Amendment 1850 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the name and contact details of the
Amendment 1856 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) the
Amendment 1858 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 1861 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 1864 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 2 – point f Amendment 1867 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 2 – point g Amendment 1873 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 2 – point h Amendment 1877 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1887 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 4 4. The obligations referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to
Amendment 1907 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 5 Amendment 1913 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 6 Amendment 1921 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The controller, his representative and the processor shall make available to the supervisory authority, on request, the documentation referred to in Article 14 or 28 as the case may be.
Amendment 2162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 2185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 2 Amendment 2819 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 1 1. Any person who has suffered damage as a result of an unlawful processing operation or of an action incompatible with this Regulation shall have the right to receive compensation from the controller or the processor for the damage suffered unless the controller or processor proves that they are not responsible for the damage either by intent or negligence.
Amendment 2832 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 3 Amendment 2914 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 79 – paragraph 5 – point f (f) does not or not sufficiently maintain the documentation pursuant to Article 14, Article 28, Article 31(4), and Article 44(3);
source: PE-506.168
2013/03/08
LIBE
4 amendments...
Amendment 3110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 86 – paragraph 2 2. The delegation of power referred to in Article 6(5), Article 8(3), Article 9(3), Article 12(5), Article 14(
Amendment 3113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 86 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 6(5), Article 8(3), Article 9(3), Article 12(5), Article 14(
Amendment 3116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 86 – paragraph 5 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 6(5), Article 8(3), Article 9(3), Article 12(5), Article 14(
Amendment 3117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 86 – paragraph 5 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 6(5), Article 8(3), Article 9(3), Article 12(5), Article 14(
source: PE-506.173
|
| 35 |
2012/0237(COD) European political parties and European political foundations: statute and funding
2013/01/18
AFCO
35 amendments...
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1 a) The European Union shall function according to the principle of 'representative democracy' as stated in Article 10(1) of the Treaty on European Union.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) As a recognition of the mission attributed to European political parties in the Treaty and in order to facilitate their work, a specific European legal status should be established for European political parties and their affiliated European political foundations, providing them with full legal capacity
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7)
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) The European political parties and the European political foundations will have rights, obligations and special responsibilities and shall therefore follow compatible organisational patterns.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The European political parties and the European political foundations should be governed by the
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (1)
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) it must observe, in particular in its programme and in its activities, the values on which the European Union is founded, namely respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities; and shall not pursue religious and ethnic goals,
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the unique name of the party,
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the admission, resignation and exclusion of the party's members, with the regularly updated list of members annexed to it,
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – point c Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Within three days following the publication of the decision of the European Parliament in the Official Journal of the European Union the European political party or the European political foundation shall be entered in the Registry. This entry shall have a constitutive character.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The European Parliament shall verify
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. Any natural or legal person may, at any moment, introduce a motivated request to the European Parliament to verify that one or more of the conditions and requirements referred to in paragraph 1 continue to be met. A breach of the values on which the Union is founded by a European political party, including its members, or by a European political foundation can only be established in accordance with
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 The European political party and the European political foundation shall
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 The European political party and the European political foundation shall have full legal
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph -1 (new) -1. A European political party or a European political foundation shall forfeit its legal status under Union Law on the date of its radiation from the Registry.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) a European political party no longer meets the
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d (d)
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. The European Parliament shall adopt a decision on the
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. A European political party or a European political foundation
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. A change in the statute of a Member of the European Parliament cannot be used as a provision for funding from the general budget of the European Union of the new party to which the Member is affiliated to.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 In accordance with Article 8 of the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, the funding and limitation of election expenses for all parties and candidates at elections to the European Parliament
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. The funding of European political parties and European political foundations from the general budget of the European Union or from any other source shall not be used to finance national, regional or local referenda campaigns, unless such referenda campaigns are directly linked to issues related to the European Union.
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The funding of European political parties and European political foundations from the general budget of the European Union or from any other source shall not be used to finance affiliated political parties which have their respective seat in third countries.
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. At the latest within
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 6 6. A European political party or a European political foundation may, in addition, be excluded from funding for up to
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 7 7. The penalties imposed pursuant to this Article shall apply to
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 2. From the list of members of a European political party, annexed to the party statutes in accordance with Article 4(2) and updated in accordance with Article 6(7), the European Parliament shall publish the total number of members, the identity of the legal and natural persons that are members
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. The European Parliament and the committee referred to in Article 7(2) shall ensure that personal data collected by them pursuant to this Regulation are not used for any purpose other than to ensure the legality, regularity and transparency of the funding of European political parties and European political foundations and the membership of European political parties. They shall destroy those personal data at the latest
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 The
source: PE-504.068
|
| 6 |
2012/2080(REG) EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 181 and 182: verbatim reports; audiovisual record of proceedings
2012/05/09
AFCO, AFCO
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 181 – paragraph 1 1. A verbatim report of the proceedings of each sitting shall be drawn up
Amendment 2 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 181 – paragraph 2 2. Speakers
Amendment 3 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 181 – paragraph 3 3. The multilingual verbatim report shall be published as an annex to the Official Journal of the European Union and preserved in the records of Parliament.
Amendment 4 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 181 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 5 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 182 – paragraph -1(new) The proceedings of Parliament shall be broadcast in real time on its website with the multilingual soundtrack from all active interpretation booths.
Amendment 6 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 182 – paragraph 1 Immediately after the sitting, an
source: PE-487.903
|
Stanimir ILCHEV on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
Term 6 20.07.2004 - 13.07.2009
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| RSS | deleted |
|
|