Ryszard CZARNECKI
Constituencies
-
Poland
Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
Poland
Samoobrona RP
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Poland
-
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Poland
Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Poland
Samoobrona RP
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
Groups
-
ECR
Member
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
-
UEN
Treasurer
Union for Europe of the Nations Group
2007/08/29 - 2009/07/13
-
UEN
Member
Union for Europe of the Nations Group
2006/11/15 - 2007/08/28
-
NA
Member
Non-attached Members
2004/07/20 - 2006/11/14
-
NA
Member
Non-attached Members
2004/07/20 - 2006/11/14
-
UEN
Member
Union for Europe of the Nations Group
2006/11/15 - 2007/08/28
-
UEN
Treasurer
Union for Europe of the Nations Group
2007/08/29 - 2009/07/13
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Budgetary Control | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Member of | Committee on Regional Development | 2012/02/02 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Petitions | 2012/05/09 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Subcommittee on Security and Defence | 2012/05/09 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vice-Chair of | Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly | 2009/09/30 | 9999/12/31 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly | 2009/09/16 | 2009/09/29 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly | 2007/05/23 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly | 2008/06/10 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Israel | 2007/05/22 | 2008/06/09 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2007/04/25 | 2007/05/21 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2004/10/13 | 2007/03/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly | 2004/09/15 | 2006/11/14 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Israel | 2004/09/15 | 2004/10/12 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Israel | 2004/09/15 | 2004/10/12 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly | 2004/09/15 | 2006/11/14 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2004/10/13 | 2007/03/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2007/04/25 | 2007/05/21 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Israel | 2007/05/22 | 2008/06/09 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly | 2007/05/23 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly | 2008/06/10 | 2009/07/13 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://www.RyszardCzarnecki.pl
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45441
- Fax
- +322 28 49441
- Office
- Bât. Willy Brandt 02M115
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75441
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79441
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T13051
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Parlament Europejski
- Rue Wiertz
- Willy Brandt 02M115
- B-1047 Bruksela
Rapporteur
| Responsible | 2012/2176(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European External Action Service |
| Responsible | 2012/2171(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Auditors |
| Responsible | 2012/2170(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Justice |
| Shadow | 2012/2166(DEC) | 2011 discharge: 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDF) |
| Shadow | 2012/2140(DEC) | Special report 9/2012 (2011 discharge): Audit of the control system governing the production, processing, distribution and imports of organic products |
| Shadow | 2012/2111(DEC) | Special report 8/2012 (2011 discharge): Targeting of aid for the modernisation of agricultural holdings |
| Shadow | 2012/2091(DEC) | Special report 5/2012 (2011 Discharge): The Common External Relations Information System (CRIS) |
| Shadow | 2012/2064(INI) | Future role of the Court of Auditors. Procedure for the nomination of Members of the Court of Auditors: consultation of the European Parliament |
| Shadow | 2012/2060(DEC) | Special report 2/2012 (2011 discharge): Financial instruments for SMEs co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund |
| Shadow | 2012/2059(DEC) | Special report 1/2012 (2011 discharge): Effectiveness of European Union development aid for food security in sub-Saharan Africa |
| Shadow | 2012/2017(DEC) | Special report 16/2011 (2011 discharge): EU financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: achievements and future challenges |
| Shadow | 2012/2015(DEC) | Special report 14/2011 (2011 discharge): Has EU assistance improved Croatia’s capacity to manage post-accession funding? |
| Shadow | 2012/2009(DEC) | Special report 12/2011 (2011 discharge): Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? |
| Shadow | 2012/0805(NLE) | Court of Auditors: appointment of a member, Leonard Orban - RO |
| Shadow | 2011/2287(INI) | Towards more efficient and cost effective interpreting in the European Parliament |
| Shadow | 2011/2265(DEC) | 2010 discharge: ENIAC Joint Undertaking |
| Shadow | 2011/2264(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) |
| Shadow | 2011/2255(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Police Office (EUROPOL) |
| Shadow | 2011/2242(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Joint Undertaking |
| Shadow | 2011/2241(DEC) | 2010 discharge: IMI Joint Undertaking for the implementation of the Joint Technology Initiative on Innovative Medicines |
| Shadow | 2011/2240(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Artemis Joint Undertaking to implement a Joint Technology Initiative in Embedded Computing Systems |
| Shadow | 2011/2239(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Clean Sky Joint Undertaking |
| Shadow | 2011/2238(DEC) | 2010 discharge: SESAR Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system |
| Shadow | 2011/2237(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy |
| Shadow | 2011/2236(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2235(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2234(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Community Fisheries Control Agency (CFCA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2233(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European GNSS Agency (GSA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2231(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (FRONTEX) |
| Shadow | 2011/2230(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Police College (CEPOL) |
| Shadow | 2011/2229(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Railway Agency (ERA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2228(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2227(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
| Shadow | 2011/2226(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2224(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2223(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2222(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Training Foundation (ETF) |
| Shadow | 2011/2221(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (EUROJUST) |
| Shadow | 2011/2220(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Medicines Agency (EMA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2219(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) |
| Shadow | 2011/2218(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2217(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Environment Agency (EEA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2216(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2215(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2214(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND) |
| Shadow | 2011/2213(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) |
| Shadow | 2011/2212(DEC) | 2010 discharge: 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDF) |
| Shadow | 2011/2209(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor |
| Shadow | 2011/2208(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, European Ombudsman |
| Shadow | 2011/2207(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Committee of the Regions |
| Shadow | 2011/2206(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Economic and Social Committee |
| Shadow | 2011/2205(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Auditors |
| Shadow | 2011/2204(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Justice |
| Shadow | 2011/2203(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section II - Council |
| Shadow | 2011/2202(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section I - European Parliament |
| Shadow | 2011/2201(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission |
| Shadow | 2011/2073(INI) | Budgetary control of EU humanitarian aid managed by ECHO |
| Shadow | 2011/2033(INI) | Budgetary management of European Union pre-accession funds in the areas of judicial systems and the fight against corruption in the candidate and potential candidate countries |
| Shadow | 2011/2014(INI) | Budgetary control of EU financial assistance to Afghanistan |
| Shadow | 2011/0454(COD) | Protection of the European Union's financial interests: Hercule III programme, 2014-2020 |
| Shadow | 2010/0036(COD) | Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association process |
| Responsible | 2009/2076(DEC) | 2008 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor |
| Responsible | 2009/2075(DEC) | 2008 discharge: EU general budget, European Ombudsman |
| Responsible | 2009/2074(DEC) | 2008 discharge: EU general budget, Committee of the Regions |
| Responsible | 2009/2073(DEC) | 2008 discharge: EU general budget, Economic and Social Committee |
| Responsible | 2009/2072(DEC) | 2008 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Auditors |
| Responsible | 2009/2071(DEC) | 2008 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Justice |
| Responsible | 2009/2070(DEC) | 2008 discharge: EU general budget, Council |
| Opinion | 2008/2131(INI) | Building a Global Climate Change Alliance between the European Union and poor developing countries most vulnerable to climate change |
| Shadow | 2008/0249(COD) | Dual-use items and technology: Community regime for the control of exports (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000) |
| Shadow | 2006/0084(COD) | Fight against fraud: investigations by the European Anti-Fraud Offfice (OLAF) |
Born
1963/01/25 Londyn- Master's in history (1986).
- Archivist, Archiwum Akt Nowych, Warsaw (1986), Solidarność Archives (1987). Journalist with The Polish Daily (London, 1988-1990). Editorial secretary, Głos (1990-1991). Deputy Editor-in-Chief, Wiadomości Dnia (1991). Editor-in-Chief, Dziennik Dolnośląski (1991). Acting director, Norpol-Press (1991). Chief Editor, Polsat TV (1993-1997). Lecturer (2001-2004).
- Chairman of the Christian-National Union (ZCHN) (1994-1996). Member of the Law and Justice party's National Council (since 2008).
- Adviser to the Mayor of Włocławek (2001-2002).
- Member of the Sejm (first parliamentary term). Vice-Chairman of the Sejm Committee on Culture and Media; Chairman of the Sejm Subcommittee on Copyright; Chairman of the Polish-Italian Parliamentary Group (1991-1993). Member of the Sejm (third parliamentary term, 1997-2001). Chairman of the Sejm Committee for Liaison with Poles Abroad (1999-2001). Vice-Chairman of the Committee on European Law (2000-2001). Sejm representative to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Western European Union (1991-2001).
- Deputy Minister of Culture (1993). Minister for European Affairs (1997-1999).
- Member of the European Parliament (since 2004). Member of the Bureau of the Union for Europe of the Nations (UEN) Group in the European Parliament (2007-2009).
- Member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Western European Union (1991-2001).
- Official European Parliament representative to the Council of Europe's European Centre for Global Interdependence and Solidarity (North-South Centre) (2008-2010).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 6 |
2009/2070(DEC) 2008 discharge: EU general budget, Council
2010/03/03
CONT
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Regrets that, unlike other institutions, the Council does not submit an annual activity report to Parliament, referring
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 - introductory part 11.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) - having regard to its Resolution of 25 November 2009 with observations forming an integral part of the Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2007, Section II – Council1,
source: PE-439.262
|
| 1 |
2010/0816(NLE) European External Action Service EEAS: organisation and functioning
2010/01/07
AFET
1 amendments...
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Article 6 – paragraph 6 6.
source: PE-443.165
|
| 5 |
2010/2004(BUD) 2011 budget, section III, Commission: guidelines
2010/02/26
BUDG
5 amendments...
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a new 14 a. Stresses that transport is an essential element of the European economy, enabling the mobility of persons, goods and knowledge across borders; underlines that transport is a vector of equality and social mobility, for young people in particular, since it opens up opportunities and improves exchanges in the field of knowledge and training;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Underlines that the priorities for 2011, in view of the EU 2020 strategy, will be financed mainly from this heading, and that the Lisbon Treaty's extension of EU competences (for example in space policy and tourism) is likely to have budgetary implications;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a new 25a. Refers to Title XII, Article 195 on 'Tourism' of the Treaty of Lisbon, and demands that full and close attention should be paid to the promotion and networking of cross-border sustainable tourism initiatives that contribute to soft mobility, climate protection and the creation of a favourable environment for the development of small and medium enterprises;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a new 26a. Recalls that, in the context of Europe's economic recovery, investment in transport particularly via investment in the TEN-Ts, has a crucial role to play in driving forward growth and employment as well as in advancing Europe's economic and environmental interests;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b new 26b. Attaches high importance to transport safety in all modes and considers, particularly after the recent tragic railway accidents and the continuing high level of road fatalities, that the EU should boost co-funding efforts within the TEN-Ts and other financing instruments for improving safety systems;
source: PE-439.297
|
| 15 |
2010/2142(DEC) 2009 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission
2011/10/03
CONT
15 amendments...
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that in the present understanding of ‘shared management’ most of the management functions are carried out by national bodies not directly accountable at Union level and over which the Commission has no authority; insists that this does not absolve the Commission of its responsibility for the implementation of the budget but, on the contrary, requires it to take a hard line with any Member States not fulfilling their responsibilities under shared management;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recalls its repeated invitations to the Commission to present a proposal for the introduction of mandatory national management declarations (NMDs) issued and signed at ministerial level and duly audited by an independent auditor so as far as such declarations are a necessary and indispensable first step to improve the efficiency of national systems and to enhance national accountability for the use of Union money; reiterates1 that for Member States with federal systems or substantial decentralisation such national declarations could take the form, in whole or in part, of a collation of regional declarations , provided that each component declaration has been audited and signed by an elected political office- holder; __________________ 1 For example paragraphs 23 and 24 of the European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005, Section III – Commission (OJ L 187, 15.7.2008, p. 23).
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Further notes the important difference between 'recovery' (sums incorrectly received are repaid by the recipient) and 'financial correction' (addressing weaknesses in the system the financial consequences of which are borne by the national taxpayer); emphasises that the 'financial correction' mechanism should not be used as an easy way of avoiding the use of a 'recovery' procedure and that whenever possible a 'recovery' procedure should be pursued to ensure that those who have benefitted from sums paid 'incorrectly' do not retain such funds;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Invites the Commission to publish in the Synthesis Report an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of individual Member States' management and control systems on the basis of the audit work it already performs as well as other relevant available information and to establish a ‘scoreboard’ on the quality of controls per Member State and policy area according to the following matrix model:
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. reiterates its call for the Court of Auditors to work with Member-State authorities to develop a matrix system of control in line with its resolution of 27 April 20061; suggests that the Court of Auditors conduct a number of 'matrix audits' annually on the same basis as the matrix scoreboard so that the control systems for a given policy area overall and of each Member State in respect of that policy area can be judged; further suggests that such 'matrix audits' be repeated periodically so progress can be clearly and authoritatively assessed; 1 Paragraph 24 of the European Parliament resolution with comments forming an integral part of the decision on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004, Section III – Commission.
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Believes that control systems cannot aim at zero risk in all spending areas, not only because it would be extremely expensive, but also because it is unlikely that zero risk in all spending areas will ever be achieved; accepts that a certain risk of error will always exist when implementing Union spending programmes; emphasises that tolerating risk is not the same as tolerating error and reaffirms that the Commission must pursue a zero-tolerance approach to all cases of mismanagement and fraud;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 a (new) 44a. Recalls the opinion expressed in its resolution of 27 April 2006 that called for "national audit bodies to assume responsibility for controlling the local use of EU funds, so as to make any consideration of establishing national offices of the Court of Auditors unnecessary"; believes that if national audit bodies are not willing for public bodies within their Member States to take over the control of expenditure from the Union budget, that consideration should be given to reorganising the Court of Auditors so that some of its members have responsibility for defined policy areas whilst others have responsibility for groups of Member States; notes that as the number of members of the Court of Auditors has virtually doubled in recent years, whilst the number of policy areas has not, this should be within the capacity of the Court of Auditors to manage;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 c (new) 45c. Reiterates its belief that transparency is one of the main instruments in achieving 'legal and regular' expenditure; believes that the objective should be the creation of a single, comprehensive, multilingual online system which can be accessed easily by any individual and would therefore allow the public to have easy access to full and complete information about the expenditure of the Union by budget line and by beneficiary; calls therefore on the Commission to publish online details of all items of Union expenditure above a de minimis threshold and to pursue the establishment of a user-friendly online system recording all beneficiaries;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 f (new) 45f. Emphasises that for the public to have confidence in the Union budget, three objectives must be pursued: - that the accounts give a 'true and fair view' of the financial position of the Union, - that all expenditure is 'legal and regular' and receives a positive statement of assurance from the Court of Auditors, - that all expenditure delivers the outcomes for which it was intended, and notes that even if the first two objectives are secured, considerable resources could still in fact be wasted unless sufficient attention is also given to the third;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 g (new) 45g. calls on the Commission to review its systems for evaluating the effectiveness of expenditure programmes to assess whether they are adding value, delivering value for money, and achieving the objectives for which they were established; insists that such evaluations should be both conducted and then assessed independently; calls therefore for independent evaluations to be submitted to Parliament and its relevant committees for scrutiny;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 h (new) 45h. calls on the Commission to investigate the creation of an independent central evaluations office, perhaps within or alongside the IAS and reporting to the Commissioner responsible for budgetary control affairs, to manage all programme evaluations to ensure that they are commissioned and conducted independently of the Directorates-General concerned and can therefore provide impartial analysis and assessment of the expenditure programmes of the Union; suggests that consideration could be given to asking such an office to also oversee the commissioning of impact assessments to ensure they are independent, of a high quality, and undertaken systematically so as to provide assurance both pre- and post-legislation;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 b (new) 47b. Calls on the Commission to review the briefing and training given to staff regarding 'Title II: Rights and Obligations of officials' of the Staff Regulations so as to ensure that all staff are fully conversant with its terms and particularly with the obligations under Article 22a(96); asks that the Commission provide details to Parliament's competent committee of the work undertaken in this area;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Notes that, since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the Ordinary Legislative Procedure applies to the Staff Regulations; invites the Commission to modernise the staff Regulations and to adapt the working conditions for the institutions' staff in such a way that Union's institutions will continue to be attractive places to work and pursue a career in; is worried that the number of candidates from certain Member States has already decreased dramatically and believes that possibilities for personal and professional development shall play a major role in this modernisation process; suggests that the language competences required of applicants be reviewed to ensure that they match the real needs of the institutions and do not exclude candidates who in all respects would be effective officials but who may be deterred by unnecessarily stringent conditions;
source: PE-460.797
|
| 9 |
2010/2143(DEC) 2009 discharge: EU general budget, European Parliament
2011/02/22
CONT
9 amendments...
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading -1 (new) (under heading "Main remaining challenges") Cost control
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Insists that, in a time of austerity, Parliament must lead by example, by controlling its costs and by carefully managing its resources; request specifically that funds for any additional expenditure that is required for enlargement of the Union or to respond to changing priorities be found by making savings elsewhere;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Notes that Article 12(9) of the Parliament's Internal Rules for the implementation of the budget, adopted on 27 April 2005, provide that the Internal Auditor's area of competence does not include the appropriations from Parliament's budget managed by political groups; further notes that the specific rules on the use of those appropriations require each political group to establish its own internal financial rules and to implement an internal control system
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47.
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Stresses that it is the responsibility of the political groups to put in place their internal
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 a (new) 69a. Believes the Parliament, as a public institution, is not competent to judge the artistic merit of film productions; insists the LUX prize be discontinued in 2011;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 b (new) 69b. Notes that the direct costs of the LUX prize amount to in excess of EUR 300 000 and that indirect costs (travel to film festivals, promotion etc) may well mean the prize costs much more; notes that after four years of operation fewer than one third of Members actually participate in the vote; further notes that voting participation varies dramatically across national delegations but appears to be significantly higher amongst Members from countries with a film on the shortlist;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 c (new) 69c. Opposes attempts to expand the prize by organising events in the member states which would imply substantially increased costs relating to publicity and promotion, venues and translation;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 a (new) 78a. Believes that, with such a wide variety of locations available within the buildings of Parliament for canteens, bars, and retail space, a variety of competitive catering outlets, including established high street brands (coffee shops, sandwich outlets, restaurants, and so forth),could, if allowed to establish themselves inside Parliament, offer a better service to staff; calls for a plan to be prepared to indicate how the different catering facilities, could be offered for tender separately when current contractual arrangements come to an end;
source: PE-458.841
|
| 2 |
2011/0268(COD) European Social Fund (ESF) 2014-2020
2012/05/06
REGI
2 amendments...
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Efficient and effective implementation of actions supported by the ESF depends on good governance and partnership between all relevant territorial and socio- economic actors, in particular local and regional authorities, the social partners and non-governmental organisations. It is therefore necessary that Member States encourage the participation of social partners and non-governmental organisations in the implementation of the ESF.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. The involvement of the relevant public authorities, social partners and other stakeholders, in particular non- governmental organisations, in the implementation of operational programmes, as referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No […], may take the form of global grants as defined in Article 113(7) of Regulation (EU) No […]. In such a case, the operational programme shall identify the part of the programme concerned by the global grant, including an indicative financial allocation from each priority axis to it.
source: PE-491.059
|
| 2 |
2011/0273(COD) European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): support to the European territorial cooperation goal
2012/04/06
REGI
2 amendments...
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv (iv) promoting legal and administrative cooperation and diverse cooperation between citizens and institutions, including necessary infrastructure (within the thematic objective of enhancing institutional capacity and an efficient public administration);
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) where appropriate, progress in implementation of actions to reinforce the capacity of authorities and beneficiaries to administer and to use the ERDF;
source: PE-490.976
|
| 1 |
2011/0274(COD) Cohesion Fund 2014-2020
2012/06/06
REGI
1 amendments...
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point a – introductory part (a) supporting the shift towards a low-
source: PE-491.027
|
| 2 |
2011/0275(COD) European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): support to the Investment for growth and jobs goal
2012/07/06
REGI
2 amendments...
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) In order to address the specific needs of the ERDF, and in line with the Europe 2020 strategy12 that cohesion policy should support the need to deliver smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, it is necessary to set out within each thematic objective laid down in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [CPR] the ERDF-specific actions as ‘investment priorities’. This list of investment priorities should not be interpreted as rules of eligibility but as areas where the focus of support should be directed, thus setting the objectives of the ERDF at a more specific level.
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The ERDF shall
source: PE-491.053
|
| 4 |
2011/0276(COD) Structural instruments: common provisions for ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD and EMFF; general provisions applicable to ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund
2012/04/06
REGI
3 amendments...
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) On the basis of the Common Strategic Framework adopted by the Commission, each Member State should prepare, in cooperation with its partners, as stipulated by Art. 5, and in dialogue with the Commission, a Partnership Contract. The Partnership Contract should translate the elements set out in the Common Strategic Framework into the national context and set out firm commitments to the achievement of Union objectives through the programming of the CSF Funds.
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 4 – paragraph 7 7. The part of the Union budget allocated to the CSF Funds shall be implemented within the framework of shared management between the Member States and the Commission, in accordance with Article 53(b) of the Financial Regulation, with the exception of
Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall, in compliance with Art. 5, prepare a Partnership Contract for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020.
source: PE-489.656
2012/05/06
REGI
1 amendments...
Amendment 1292 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 84 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 source: PE-491.056
|
| 3 |
2011/0454(COD) Protection of the European Union's financial interests: Hercule III programme, 2014-2020
2012/10/23
CONT
3 amendments...
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) This Regulation complies with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. The Hercule III programme facilitates cooperation between the Member States and between the Commission and the Member States in order to protect the financial interests of the Union,
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2 – ensuring the necessary support and facilitating investigations, in particular the setting up of joint investigation teams and cross border operations, whilst respecting the distinct traditions of each Member State;
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 – exchanging experience and best practices between the relevant authorities in the Member States, and third countries as referred to in Article 6(2) as well as representatives of international organisations as mentioned in Article 6 (3), including specialised law enforcement services;
source: PE-498.050
|
| 20 |
2011/2201(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission
2012/07/03
CONT
20 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision 3 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision 4 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision 5 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision 6 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision 7 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision 8 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Insists the Commission take a position of zero tolerance in all cases of mismanagement and incompetence;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Calls for the Commission to take immediate action when any problems of mismanagement and incompetence are discovered including the full and unhesitating use of the sanctions available including payment interruptions and suspensions;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution New subheading after "Specific issues" heading The role of the Commissioner responsible for budgetary control issues
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph - 64 a (new) - 64a. Notes that in the 2004-2009 Commission, a Commissioner had full- time responsibility for budgetary control as had previously been called for by Parliament; regrets the fact that within the current Commission budgetary control issues have been merged with other responsibilities ('taxation and customs union'); proposes that in the 2014-2019 Commission a full-time Commissioner for Budgetary Control be re-established with responsibility for matters related, inter alia, to the following areas: - internal audit, - anti-fraud, - liaison with the Court of Auditors and the relevant committee of Parliament; - contact with the relevant budgetary and audit authorities in the member states, and the development of a comprehensive internal control framework, - overseeing and improving the utility of the annual synthesis report, including a review of the Member States' management and control systems, - commissioning and assessing independent programme evaluations, and developing the Evaluation Report, provided for by Article 318 of the TFEU, into a valuable tool for performance improvement;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 f (new) 72f. Emphasises the vital role transparency plays in ensuring accountability for the use of public funds; Reiterates its call for all grant payments from Union funds to be recorded in a user-friendly online database; believes that the payment of Union funds should be explicitly conditional on the acceptance by the beneficiaries that the basic details - including the amount, recipient's name, and purpose - be a matter of public record;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 g (new) 72g. Requests that the Commission submit to Parliament's competent committee by September 2012 a report on its activities to promote whistle-blowing both amongst its staff and the wider public;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 h (new) 72h. Reiterates its call for the Commission to review the briefing and training given to staff regarding 'Title II: Rights and Obligations of officials' of the Staff Regulation so as to ensure that all staff are fully conversant with its terms and particularly with the obligations under Article 22a of the Staff Regulations;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 82 82. Believes that payments are resumed too quickly and calls on the Commission to make this power of sanction more effective by only resum
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 88 – indent 3 a (new) - ensuring that a full range of sanctions (interruptions, suspensions, financial corrections, and penalties) are available for all funds with minimal scope for discretion when breaches of the rules are discovered;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. Deplores the fact that the Court of Auditors has yet again been unable to give a positive Statement of Assurance regarding the legality and regularity of the implementation of the budget;
source: PE-483.775
|
| 26 |
2011/2202(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section I - European Parliament
2012/06/03
CONT
26 amendments...
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the year saw consolidation and further modernisation of the administration, with a stronger focus on core activities, restructuring of services, better use of modern technologies and increased interinstitutional cooperation
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that this overall high level of implementation is partly due to two targeted transfers made before the end of the financial year 2010 (EUR 9 240 000 for the purchase of a Europe House in Sofia and EUR 10 923 000 for four major IT projects); welcomes the fact that no mopping-up transfers took place between 2010 and 2011; encourages, however, its administration to pursue the objective of better and clearer budget planning and discipline in the future and notes that to put buildings, IT or any other important expenditure in the budget would provide more financial clarity; believes that all significant expenditure should be fully planned for in the annual budget and not arise as a result of a need to mop-up underspends;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35a. Insists that reinforcing the security of Parliament's buildings and their immediate surroundings must be given the highest priority; requests that as part of this work security in the car parks should be improved, and that the access to Members' offices in Parliament should be controlled;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39a. Notes that the communications budget consists of three main strands: 'legislative', 'values' and 'elections'; believes that the public will be better able to come to a view about the importance of voting with reference to real issues; proposes that in the run-up to the 2014 European elections all possible resources should be diverted to the 'legislative' strand so that the public might be given the maximum information about the actual work of Members of the European Parliament;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 d (new) 42d. Believes that Parliament should not be in the business of running museums; proposes that if this House of European History is established it be made an independent body with full responsibility for its activities and resources;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 e (new) 42e. Believes that the House of European History project should be put on hold, especially given the current economic and financial climate;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Regrets that EuroparlTV cannot be considered to be a success story in view of its very low number of direct individual users (excluding viewers through partnership agreements with regional TVs) in spite of the considerable financing that it received in 2010, amounting to some EUR 9 000 000 (item 3 2 4 6); welcomes the efforts made to reduce this budget by 14 % (to EUR 8 000 000) in 2011 and in the subsequent years;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Notes that the costs relating to the LUX Prize in 2010 were EUR 380 666,18; is concerned that the costs rose for the event in 2011 to EUR 573 722,08 (by over 50 %) and looks forward to a sharp reverse in this trend from 2012 onwards; specifically requests that the following activities be curtailed in order to contain costs: - expensive internal promotion within the buildings of Parliament, - promotional activities at international film festivals, - the large expenditure associated with the costs of organising 'mini-LUX' events in the Member States;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 a (new) 45a. Notes the expenditure of the prizes for the period 2009-11: 2009 2010 2011 Journalists prize €105 000 €118 059 €154 205 Sakharov Prize €300 000 €645 542 €652 348 Charlemagne Youth €24 000 €34 000 €35 000 Prize LUX prize €320 000 €380 666 €573 722 Totals: €749 000 €1 178 267 €1 415 276
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 b (new) 45b. Believes that the 89 % increase in the expenditure on the prizes between 2009 and 2011 used funds that could have been better deployed elsewhere; calls for future expenditure on prizes to be brought back down to the levels of 2009;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 c (new) 45c. Calls on the Bureau to cancel the LUX prize on the grounds that Parliament is a political not a cultural institution and so is not an appropriate body to judge creative activities such as art, books, music, or films;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 c (new) 47c. Believes that there is an inherent contradiction between having a highly centralised communications strategy and budget as well as a large expenditure on the buildings and staff of the information offices in the Member States; proposes consideration be given to two options to end this contradiction: 1) a substantial reduction in the number/costs of the information offices; or 2) a substantial decentralisation of the communications budget to the information offices, under the supervision of a cross-party panel of local members in each Member State, in order to be well adapted to the diverse information needs of the public and to be more closely in touch with the national political and media situation;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Notes the opening in April 2010 of the EP Liaison Office (EPLO) in Washington and the system of one-year missions for four officials put in place in October 2010; observes that, although the creation of the Washington Office has not entailed the creation of any new posts, other costs have inevitably been incurred; calls for a review of its structure, activities and costs to be presented to the Bureau with copies to the relevant competent committees;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 a (new) 51a. Notes that staff numbers have increased dramatically over recent years; calls for staff numbers to be immediately frozen at their current levels and subsequently reviewed to identify where reductions can be made;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 54. Points to the difficulties in recruiting officials or agents from certain Member States such as Germany, the UK, Austria or the Netherlands for which the proportion of staff in Parliament's Secretariat is significantly lower than the ‘demographic weight’ of the given country within the Union and observes the relatively high numbers of staff of holding the nationality of Belgium (13,6 %) or Luxemburg (2,3 %), as a result of the working places of Parliament; asks the Bureau to review recruitment procedures and requirements to ascertain what part they may play in creating difficulties to recruit staff from these Member States;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 55 55. Notes that, in 2010, there were 33 200 missions (official trips) representing a total of 98 629 mission days, most of them involving travel between Parliament's three places of work; reiterates the need to avoid unnecessary missions between the three working places and the costs they entail with more systematic and documentary justifications and better monitoring; requests that the Secretary General report, as part of the discharge procedure, on any savings made as a result of further rationalisation; asks the Secretary-General specifically to review the posts based outside of Brussels, particularly for those staff members who undertake repeated missions to Brussels, to ascertain if they need to be relocated; suggests that the agreement with the Luxembourg authorities, which fixes the number of Parliament staff based in Luxembourg without regard to any evolving needs of Parliament, may need to be revised;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 a (new) 57a. Notes that the European Council, whilst justifiably calling for austerity on the part of Parliament, continues to deny it the opportunity to make the considerable savings that would arise from ceasing to hold meetings in Strasbourg;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 63 a (new) 63a. Notes that the property portfolio of Parliament has substantially increased over recent years; insists that no additional buildings be purchased or leased during the next multiannual financial framework period;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 64 c (new) 64c. Notes the decision to purchase the Trebel building which will become available in 2017; proposes however that no further building(s) be leased to substitute for this building during the redevelopment project even if this means that refurbishments and non-urgent maintenance on existing buildings must be delayed until its completion;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 64 f (new) 64f. Reiterates its call for more diverse catering options within the buildings of Parliament by ceasing to offer a monopoly to a single catering provider when current contracts reach the end of their term;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 70 70. Notes that final appropriations for the Travel Agency amounted to EUR 1 438 000 in 2010, with a high commitment rate (94 %); further notes that it obtains negotiated prices from airlines, which means that there is an average price for the best service; stresses however that this does not mean that, for a specific day or journey, it is not possible to get better prices by booking directly with travel operators; calls on the existing travel agent contractor to make better efforts to ensure that the cheapest options are always proposed to Members and staff; further calls on the appropriate directorate to monitor service levels provided by the Travel Agency and whether this represents value for money and to report back to the appropriate parliamentary committee by the end of 2012;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 70 a (new) 70a. Believes that Parliament should cease awarding monopolistic contracts wherever possible and that reduced costs and a better service for Members and staff would result from having more than one travel agency at their disposal;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 75 75. Notes the Bureau decisions of 17 June 2009 and of 18 October 2010 to extend the areas with wireless network access (Wi-Fi) in Parliament covering the Chamber, committee rooms, Members' offices and public spaces both in Brussels and Strasbourg but expresses concern at the high cost of this project (1st phase of the project: EUR 7 878 000);
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 87 c (new) 87c. Calls on the Conference of Presidents to schedule a debate on Parliament's discharge at a different time than the debate on the other discharge reports in order to give Members the opportunity to give it the exclusive attention the discharge of their own institution deserves;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 87 d (new) 87d. Suggests to the Bureau that it should put on its agenda a discussion on the discharge resolution following its adoption by plenary;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 87 e (new) 87e. Reiterates its call for the Bureau to issue 'green papers' to all Members on key policy areas regarding matters within its competence before taking any definitive decisions in order to stimulate a wider debate within political groups and the house as a whole;
source: PE-483.679
|
| 6 |
2011/2203(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section II - Council
2012/07/03
CONT
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Reiterates its view that the European taxpayers have every right to expect that the entirety of the Union budget, including all the funds managed autonomously by its separate institutions and agencies, should be subject to full public scrutiny;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Deplores the fact that the Council believes that it - uniquely amongst the institutions of the European Union - is not accountable for its use of the funds put at its disposal;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Notes the flaw in the Council's argument that granting discharge to the Commission should be interpreted as granting discharge to the entirety of the Union budget, including parts of the budget used by the Council, is demonstrated by its inconsistent adherence to the position that the Commission should not have the power to oversee and manage its budget; believes that the only logical resolution of this conflict is for Council either to invite the Commission to take control of its finances or to participate fully in a standard discharge procedure;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Is of the opinion that the efficiency and stability of the discharge procedure between Parliament and the Council would benefit from an agreement between the two institutions on the key aspects of this procedure which must necessarily follow mutatis mutandis the full procedures followed for all the other institutions of the European Union;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls therefore on the Committee on Budgetary Control to draw up a list of the key aspects that might be included in such an agreement which shall include inter alia a list of documents to be submitted, the use of a questionnaire to seek further information, and participation in a public hearing of the Committee.
source: PE-483.636
|
| 6 |
2011/2205(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Auditors
2012/07/03
CONT
6 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Also notes that the Court of Auditors undertook a total of 376 audit missions – 351 to Member States and 25 elsewhere (France: 52, Germany: 38, United Kingdom: 32, Italy: 30; Spain: 26, Netherlands: 23, Sweden: 15, Portugal: 14, Greece: 13, Denmark: 12; Luxembourg: 11, Hungary: 10, Poland: 10) and that just less than half of the Member States were therefore visited;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Asks the Court of Auditors, whilst recognising resource limitations and the reality of a sampling methodology, to seek to ensure it covers all Member States over a relatively short time frame;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Calls on the Court of Auditors to publish Annual Reports on each Member State when possible, to bring together all their research across different programme areas related to a single Member State;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Notes that a traditional sampling method works best when auditing a single programme and a single management & control system but when both the selection of transactions/procedures and the selection of Member States is part of the sampling process it is harder to establish a clear understanding of the situation; requests that the Court of Auditors think in terms of occasional 'matrix' audits which sample transactions within a programme but cover all 27 Member States in order to reach conclusions about both the programme and the individual Member States;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 d (new) 12d. Suggests that as part of any review of the Court of Auditors' operations, consideration be given to allocating to Court Members, responsibilities for specific Member States in addition to their programme responsibilities; notes that this would give Members of the Court of Auditors the opportunity to develop closer relationships with national/regional audit authorities, and locally-appointed auditors for specific programmes;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 f (new) 12f. Requests the Court of Auditors to incorporate into its future work programmes a systematic follow-up of specific past audits, following a sufficient time lapse, to assess progress;
source: PE-483.638
|
| 3 |
2011/2206(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Economic and Social Committee
2012/07/03
CONT
3 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the EESC, as a body designed to offer privileged access to the Union's legislative and policy-making processes, to fund its activities by means of subscription for those few bodies that have secured representation;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Reiterates the call made in its resolution1 on discharge to the EESC for the financial year 2009 to undertake with urgency a comprehensive spending review of all areas of activity to ensure all expenditure is delivering value for money in order to identify savings which will reduce the pressure on the budget in this period of austerity; calls on the EESC to adopt the principle of zero-based budgeting to identify savings, rather than simply adding a nominal percentage increase for inflation to existing budgets during each budget cycle; 1 OJ L 250, 27.9.2011, p.98.
source: PE-483.639
|
| 4 |
2011/2207(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Committee of the Regions
2012/07/03
CONT
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Committee of the Regions (CoR), as a body designed to offer a relatively small number of bodies privileged access to the Union's legislative and policy-making processes, to fund its activities by means of subscription for those local and regional institutions that believe it serves a valuable purpose;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the CoR to undertake a comprehensive spending review based on the principle of zero-based budgeting to identify savings, rather than simply adding a nominal percentage increase for inflation to existing budgets during each budget cycle;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union highlights the importance of the subsidiarity principle
source: PE-483.640
|
| 11 |
2012/2107(DEC) Special report 6/2012 (2011 discharge): European Union Assistance to the Turkish Cypriot Community
2012/11/20
CONT
11 amendments...
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the Republic of Cyprus joined the EU, on 1 May 2004, as a divided island due to the rejection of the UN comprehensive settlement plan by the Greek Cypriots, and that pursuant to Article 1(1) of Protocol 10 of the Act of Accession 2003 the application of the acquis is suspended in the areas of the Republic of Cyprus in which the Government of the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the existing de facto division of Cyprus dates back to 1963, when the inter-communal conflict erupted followed with a UN decision to send a peace keeping force to Cyprus in March 1964 and Turkey’s military in
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that as a result of the
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges the fact that
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Takes note that the programme has assisted a great number of different beneficiaries across the Turkish Cypriot community and some important results have already been achieved, where the developing and restructuring of infrastructure constitutes a large portion of EU’s financial assistance to Turkish Cypriots and covers a number of projects which have mostly resulted with great success, but that the construction of a Kumkov seawater desalination plant, which is the programme’s largest
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that the programme has assisted many different beneficiaries across the Turkish Cypriot community; but observes nevertheless that it has not been possible to implement the single largest bi-communal project, the construction of a seawater desalination plant (27,5 million euro) due to
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Recalls here that the ultimate objective of the instrument is to support economic and social development of the Turkish Cypriot Community with a view to facilitate the reunification of Cyprus;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Regrets the loss of the seawater desalination plant project which was an unfortunate setback; recalls that this project was not only the main project in the water sector but also the largest bi- communal project funded under the instrument and that the plant was intended to provide 23 000 m3 of clean drinking water per day covering the needs of an estimated 100 000 people and recalls that water supply is becoming an increasingly critical issue for the island following a 40 % decrease in the mean annual rainfall in the past 30 years; is deeply concerned
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Emphasizes that the main objective of Regulation (EC) No 389/2006 is to support economic and social development of the Turkish Cypriot Community with a view to facilitat
source: PE-500.584
|
| 2 |
2012/2131(INI) Integration of migrants, its effects on the labour market and the external dimension of social security coordination
2012/03/12
LIBE
1 amendments...
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. It is important to explicitly address immigration of members of extremist and terrorist organisations, as well as the concerns regarding immigration and forced marriages from countries such as Pakistan.
source: PE-500.619
2012/11/23
LIBE
1 amendments...
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. It is important to explicitly address immigration of members of extremist and terrorist organisations, as well as the concerns regarding immigration and forced marriages from countries like Pakistan.
source: PE-500.619
|
| 3 |
2012/2136(INI) Impact of the financial and economic crisis on human rights
2012/12/18
AFET
3 amendments...
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses the importance of policy coherence and coordination in order to attain the objective of poverty reduction and to increase the impact of EU external assistance, particularly in Pakistan;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Reiterates that budget support to partner countries should be more closely linked to the human rights and governance situation of the partner countries, particularly in Pakistan;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Urges governments to take all the necessary measures to reduce extremes in income inequality and put in place conditions that will enable those currently living in extreme poverty to fully realise their potential and live in dignity, particularly in Pakistan;
source: PE-502.039
|
| 2 |
2012/2138(INI) Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy
2012/02/10
AFET
2 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas, at the same time, threats to global security are growing because of uncertainties linked to the attitudes of States engaged in programmes which dangerously encourage nuclear proliferation, the harbouring of terrorist organizations such as exposed in the evolution of the Afghan-Pakistan area in view of the prospect of the withdrawal of NATO troops the escalation of local crises in the EU's neighbourhood with major regional implications, such as the current Syrian conflict, the vagaries of the transition process in the Arab countries and its security dimension (Libya, Sinai ...),
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Welcomes the EUPOL Afghanistan mission which aims to establish a civilian police force and a judicial system to allow Afghans to shoulder most of the responsibility for these tasks in the context of the reconstruction of the Afghan State; stresses that this mission, which is due to remain there until 31 May 2013
source: PE-496.429
|
| 8 |
2012/2145(INI) Annual report on human rights and democracy in the world 2011 and the European Union's policy on the matter
2012/02/10
AFET
8 amendments...
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas violations of freedom of religion or belief, perpetrated by governments and non-state actors alike, are increasing in many countries of the world, namely in Pakistan as exposed by the Blasphemy Law, resulting in discrimination, intolerance and violence against certain individuals and religious communities, including religious minority representatives;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Reiterates its concern, however, with the persistently disappointing lack of progress in a number of human rights dialogues, and the lack of transparent benchmarks to genuinely assess improvements or deterioration in human rights; notes the continued EU difficulties to negotiate improved modalities for the dialogue with China
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41. Remains disappointed that there has been no systematic involvement of Parliament in the assessments of the human rights dialogue, including for Russia
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Notes with concern the worrying trend of increased attacks and intimidation against journalists and media workers in the OSCE area and in third countries like Pakistan; calls for a stepping up of EU efforts to promote their safety in dialogues with the Union's partners and other countries;
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 57. Regrets that persecution and marginalisation of human rights defenders remain a widespread tendency in China, Russia, Pakistan and all other countries that still mistake high human rights standards for an imposition of the EU, the UN and global human rights organisations; regrets that disbarred lawyers in China and politically persecuted journalists and media workers are regarded as an internal affair; regrets that social tolerance of religious minorities in Pakistan is extremely low;
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 58 58. Regrets the general assessment in the EU Annual Report that in many countries like Pakistan, there is a contraction of democratic space
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 64 64. Welcomes the assessment by human rights organisations that the use of the death penalty in 2011 broadly confirms the global trend towards abolition; regrets, however, that there was a significant increase in executions in Pakistan, Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia; expresses serious disappointment at the refusal of China to disclose credible information about its use of death penalty and executions that, according to Amnesty International, number in the thousands; welcomes the abolition of the death penalty in the US state of Illinois but regrets that the United States continues to execute people despite being the only G8 country to do so in 2011; recalls with concern that Belarus is the only European country to continue use the death penalty; urges the Pakistan Government to remove the Blasphemy Law; urges the EU and its Member States consistently to bring this issue up in their dialogues with these countries;
Amendment 359 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 81 81. Remains deeply concerned that discrimination based on religion or belief continues in many regions of the world, and that persons belonging to particular religious communities, including religious minorities, continue to be denied their human rights; is particularly concerned by the situation in Pakistan where a reform of education to incorporate themes of religious tolerance is critical for the development of a tolerant Pakistani society which values religious freedom and religious diversity for all its citizens; is particularly concerned by the situation in China where individuals who practise their religion outside officially sanctioned channels, including Christians, Muslims, Buddhists and Falun Gong practitioners, often face persecution; urges China to ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as it has promised; urges the Chinese authorities to suspend and subsequently amend, through genuinely consultative processes with Tibetans, the policies that most negatively impact Tibetan Buddhism, culture and tradition;
source: PE-496.431
|
| 10 |
2012/2168(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Parliament
2013/02/27
CONT
10 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Bureau to schedule as a specific agenda item a discussion of the discharge report in May or June, shortly after its adoption by plenary;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Reiterates its proposal that the Bureau should circulate more 'White Papers' on policy items of general interest to all Members so they can be thoroughly discussed within political groups prior to a final decision being taken;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39 a. Notes that 192 members of staff report to the Directors General without going through a Director; asks the Secretary-General to review this situation to ensure that 'cabinets' for Directors- General are not being created unofficially; asks the Secretary-General to include in the review an assessment of the grades, powers and responsibilities of these staff;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Takes note of the fact that the contract with the current travel agency expires on 31 December 2013 and that the preparations of a new call for tenders have started; regrets that, while the possibility of a financial audit was provided for in the contract, this is not the case for an audit of the structure and performance of the travel agency; insists that a future contract should include the possibility of intermediary and final financial and performance audits; as requested by the Committee on Budgetary Control, welcomes the fact that the administration will also have recourse to external expertise when establishing tender documentation and throughout the selection procedure, thereby ensuring that Parliament chooses the best solution, resulting in major simplifications and cost- savings; stresses that the new contract should take into account the best quality/price ratio and the best value for money with competitive prices; reiterates its proposal for exploring the possibility of having two travel agencies operating within Parliament, in direct competition, and whether this might provide a cost- neutral way of increasing efficiency and achieving best value for money;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Regrets that the audience of Europarl TV, although greater in 2011 as compared with 2010
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Is concerned at the increased cost of the Lux Prize in 2011
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Notes that a business plan for the House of European History in Brussels was approved by the Bureau on 26 September 2011
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 a (new) 50a. Insists that the time has finally come to end all subsidies to the catering service, as it is no longer tenable that officials and staff pay anything other than market prices; expects to this end that catering services will be required to be self- sufficient; reiterates its suggestion that the possibility be explored for the existence of two or more service providers, in direct competition, so as to encourage increased quality of service and best value for money;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Points out that any property and buildings strategy must also take account of the rising costs of maintaining the buildings purchased; suggests that the current buildings strategy should be urgently re-examined, with a view to halting all expansion;
source: PE-506.000
|
| 1 |
2012/2176(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European External Action Service
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Is concerned that non-compliance with the rules has lead to a number of incorrect payments to staff members, legal uncertainty for temporary staff and for the EEAS, failure to respect the Financial Regulation and unrecovered VAT and a breach of the procurement rules which all Union institutions are bound to comply with; notes that the EEAS has stated it has taken the necessary steps to avoid the recurrence of non-compliance; requests that the EEAS, in the context of the 2012 discharge procedure, informs Parliament of the results;
source: PE-506.047
|
| 1 |
2012/2184(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND)
2013/02/27
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.844
|
| 4 |
2012/2185(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)
2013/02/27
CONT
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is concerned by the fact that in December 2012, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) opened an investigation into alleged irregularities in the Agency as a result of allegations made by one of the applicants in the above-mentioned court cases; requ
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Is convinced that merger of the European Institute for Gender Equality and the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights should be urgently considered in order to avoid duplication of tasks and to reduce overhead costs;
source: PE-497.850
|
| 2 |
2012/2186(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.880
|
| 3 |
2012/2187(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Environment Agency (EEA)
2013/02/27
CONT
3 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes from the Court of Auditors' report that the Agency made a payment to an international environmental organisation amounting to EUR 6 061 which was related to the participation of Agency staff in expeditions organised by that organisation in February and May 2011;
source: PE-497.873
|
| 2 |
2012/2189(DEC) 2011 discharge: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT)
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.866
|
| 2 |
2012/2190(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Medicines Agency (EMA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.879
|
| 2 |
2012/2191(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (EUROJUST)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.846
|
| 5 |
2012/2193(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA)
2013/02/27
CONT
5 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes with concern the Court of Auditors' finding that budget commitments amounting to EUR 0,9 million were not related to existing legal commitments and the Agency should have decommitted and paid back the amount to the Commission at the beginning of 2012; notes, however, that the Agency initiated the process too late and as a result, due to restrictions imposed by the IT system, the funds will be blocked for one year and will only be decommitted and paid back at the end of 2012; considers that this is unacceptable;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the Court of Auditors identified the need to improve the Agency's asset management; it found, in particular, unexplained differences between the recorded annual and cumulated depreciation and that for internally created intangible assets, accounting procedures and information on costs were not reliable; notes that evidence of a physical inventory of administrative equipment within the required period was lacking; remarks that until the serious problems in the Agency are resolved no further extension of the Agency's competency should be considered;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes with concern the Court of Auditors' finding that when the Agency sold two sets of sweeping arms systems for at-sea oil recovery services in December 2011, aiming to obtain at least the equipment's net book value of EUR 319 050 , as a result of the minimum price being wrongly set below net book value, the equipment was sold at a loss of EUR 93 950; considers that this is unacceptable and shows lack of regard for taxpayers money;
source: PE-497.881
|
| 6 |
2012/2194(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
2013/02/27
CONT
6 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges from the Court of Auditors' report that the decrease in the country coefficient for Germany in June 2010 caused a significant surplus in the Agency's Title I ‘Staff Expenditure’ appropriations for 2011 and that about EUR 3 million (7 % of the appropriations) were transferred from Title I to various budget lines in Title III ‘Operational Expenditure’, despite their low implementation rate in terms of payments; notes, moreover, that this significant cross title transfer, which changed the structure of the budget considerably, was not put to the Agency's Management Board for approval;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes note that the transfer increased Title III appropriations to EUR 13,7 million and that at the end of 2011, EUR 7,8 million was carried over to 2012;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Remarks that the budgetary authority is concerned by the high administrative costs at the Agency and is strongly dissatisfied with the answers regarding them that were given by the Executive Director of the Agency in the hearing of the Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control because they did not adequately address members' questions;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 – subparagraph 2 source: PE-497.869
|
| 4 |
2012/2195(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
2013/02/27
CONT
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
source: PE-497.871
|
| 4 |
2012/2196(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
2013/02/27
CONT
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes, from the Court of Auditors' report and the Authority's annual activity report (AAR), that in 2011, 13 budgetary transfers were made; notes that, in particular, EUR 2,46 million was transferred from Title I to the infrastructure and IT budget lines of Title II, aiming to provide the resources for the adaptation of IT systems and financial systems related to the reorganisation and the migration to the accrual-based accounting financial system, and to reinforce the resources available for the move to the final seat and equipment for the final seat; notes, moreover, that transfers were carried out within Titles II and III;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes with concern that the Authority was criticised for a lack of transparency with respect to the publication of annual declarations of interest and the absence of training on conflicts of interest and demands that this matter be remedied forthwith;
source: PE-497.875
|
| 2 |
2012/2197(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.882
|
| 4 |
2012/2198(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Railway Agency (ERA)
2013/02/27
CONT
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that the level of payments against budget appropriations improved for all titles, but remained low for Title III with 47 % (39 % in 2010);
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates that using two locations (Lille and Valenciennes) to carry out its activities exposes the Agency to additional costs; for this reason one location should be urgently reconsidered; notes, moreover, that this observation has been made since 2006 and that no action has been taken by the Council to change the Decision of 13 December 2003
source: PE-497.883
|
| 2 |
2012/2201(DEC) 2011 discharge: European GNSS Agency (GSA)
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.854
|
| 2 |
2012/2202(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFSA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.874
|
| 2 |
2012/2204(DEC) 2011 discharge: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.842
|
| 5 |
2012/2205(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Police Office (EUROPOL)
2013/02/27
CONT
5 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges from the Court of Auditors' report that in 2010, more than EUR 1,6 million had to be cancelled and in 2011, EUR 1,9 million (9 % of the appropriations carried over from 2010) were cancelled; notes, moreover, that in 2011 the level of carry-overs of commitment appropriations was also high, with EUR 4,2 million (41 %) for Title II ‘administrative expenditure’ and EUR 10,6 million (46 %) for Title III ‘operational expenditure’;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Acknowledges from the Court of Auditors' report that weaknesses were found as regards the physical verification and recording of assets before and after the move to the new headquarters; in addition,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 source: PE-497.848
|
| 2 |
2012/2206(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.876
|
| 2 |
2012/2207(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Banking Authority (EBA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes from the Court of Auditors that weaknesses as regards three legal commitments made in advance of budget commitments (EUR 742 000) were noted;
source: PE-497.870
|
| 1 |
2012/2209(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)
2013/02/27
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.885
|
| 2 |
2012/2211(DEC) 2011 discharge: Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC)
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.865
|
| 2 |
2012/2212(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.878
|
| 1 |
2012/2214(DEC) 2011 discharge: performance, financial management and control of EU agencies
2013/02/27
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Urges the Agencies to examine their internal administrative processes with a view to reducing administrative costs, which are generally too high across the Agencies;
source: PE-497.863
|
| 2 |
2012/2215(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Fusion for Energy)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.003
|
| 2 |
2012/2216(DEC) 2011 discharge: SESAR Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.005
|
| 2 |
2012/2219(DEC) 2011 discharge: IMI Joint Undertaking for the implementation of the Joint Technology Initiative on Innovative Medicines
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.006
|
Ryszard CZARNECKI on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
Term 6 20.07.2004 - 13.07.2009
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |