Rebecca HARMS
Constituencies
-
Germany
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
Germany
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Germany
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
Groups
-
Verts/ALE
Co-Chair
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
-
Verts/ALE
Vice-Chair
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
2007/02/27 - 2009/07/13
-
Verts/ALE
Member
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
2004/07/20 - 2007/02/26
-
Verts/ALE
Member
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
2004/07/20 - 2007/02/26
-
Verts/ALE
Vice-Chair
Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance
2007/02/27 - 2009/07/13
EP staff
- Member of Conference of Presidents 2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substitute of | Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Industry, Research and Energy | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Fisheries | 2012/01/24 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://www.rebecca-harms.de
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45695
- Fax
- +322 28 49695
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 08G202
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75695
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79695
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T05062
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Europäisches Parlament
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 08G202
- B-1047 Brussel
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2012/0190(COD) | Reducing CO2 emissions from new passenger cars: modalities for reaching the 2020 target |
| Shadow | 2011/0414(CNS) | Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation 2014-2020 |
| Shadow | 2011/0363(NLE) | Nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes 2014-2020 in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia |
| Shadow | 2010/0306(NLE) | Management of spent fuel and radioactive waste: EU legal framework |
| Responsible | 2009/0172(NLE) | Nuclear safety: financial assistance to decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria, 'Kozloduy Programme' |
| Opinion | 2008/0231(CNS) | Community framework for nuclear safety |
| Opinion | 2008/0221(COD) | Fuel efficiency: labelling of tyres |
| Opinion | 2007/2120(INI) | CARS 21: A Competitive Automotive Regulatory Framework |
| Opinion | 2007/2119(INI) | Community Strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles |
| Opinion | 2004/2131(INI) | Stimulating technologies for sustainable development: an environmental technologies action plan of the European Union |
| Responsible | 2004/0221(CNS) | Nuclear energy: Bohunice V1 nuclear power plant in Slovakia, implementation of the Protocol No 9 annexed to the Accession Act 2004 |
Born
1956/12/07 Hambrock bei Uelzen- School-leaving certificate in Uelzen (1975).
- Qualified as tree nurserywoman and landscape gardener (1979). Assistant to Undine von Blottnitz, MEP (1984-1988).
- Member of the Wendland Film Cooperative (1988-1994).
- Greens Member of Lower Saxony Regional Assembly (1994-2004); Group Chair in the Assembly (1998-2004).
- Member of Party Council of Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (since 1998). Head of Greens list for the 2004 European election campaign.
- Executive Committee member, Lüchow-Dannenberg Citizens' Environmental Initiative (1977-1984). Member, NDR Broadcasting Council. Advisory Committee member, Association of Hydro-Electric Power Station Operators of Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein (1994-2004). Environment Committee member, Toto-Lotto Foundation, Lower Saxony (1998-2004).
- Gold medal, Association of Hydro-Electric Power Station Operators of Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein.
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 15 |
2009/0172(NLE) Nuclear safety: financial assistance to decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria, 'Kozloduy Programme'
2010/01/03
ENVI
11 amendments...
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The agreement to close Units 3 and 4 of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant ahead of schedule on safety grounds should be reflected in the earliest possible transfer of the irradiated fuel elements from the storage ponds of the two units to an external temporary storage facility.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The loss of generating capacity due to the early closure of Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 to 4 has not led to a domestic shortage of electricity in Bulgaria. Consequently, an increase in greenhouse gas emissions, if any, can not be linked to the closure of these units.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Consequently, provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the European Union to fund the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, and for the assistance towards achieving safe final disposal of all radioactive substances involved in the decommissioning over the period from 2010 to 2013.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) EUR 180 million of the funds is intended to assist the following projects: (1) project management, technical assistance for the support of the implementation of the decommissioning programme; (2) the provision of salaries for 715 experts (operation, maintenance, technical support, project management) at the Kozloduy site, working for the decommissioning of Units 1-4; (3) contribution to the construction of the National Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, crucial for the implementation of the decommissioning programme; (4) site infrastructure and treatment of dismantled waste (including additional allocation for projects already in the tendering process). The improvement of site infrastructure referred to as part of Project 4 may only comprise measures relating to the decommissioning of Units 1-4. The remaining EUR 120 million is intended to assist progress towards direct final disposal and more rapid expansion of capacity for the temporary dry storage which is required until final disposal.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The appropriations of the general budget of the European Union for decommissioning should not lead to distortions of competition in relation to power supply companies on the energy market in the Union.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation establishes the programme laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution to address the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The Community contribution to the Kozloduy programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant,
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Commission staff and outside personnel authorised by the Commission shall have appropriate right of access, particularly to the beneficiary
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall ensure the implementation of this Regulation and shall report
source: PE-439.326
2010/08/03
ITRE
4 amendments...
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The loss of generating capacity due to the early closure of Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 to 4 has not led to a domestic shortage of electricity in Bulgaria. Consequently, an increase in greenhouse gas emissions, if any, cannot be linked to the closure of these units.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Consequently, provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the European Union to fund the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, and for assistance towards achieving safe final disposal of all radioactive substances involved in the decommissioning over the period from 2010 to 2013.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 The Commission shall ensure the implementation of this Regulation and shall report
source: PE-439.416
|
| 43 |
2009/0173(COD) Reduction of CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles: emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles
2010/05/19
ITRE
10 amendments...
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The speed of road vehicles has a strong influence on their fuel consumption and CO2 emissions. In addition, in the absence of speed limitation for light commercial vehicles, it is possible that there is an element of competition as regards top speed which could lead to oversized powertrains and associated inefficiencies in slower operating conditions. It is therefore appropriate to
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation establishes CO2 emissions performance requirements for new light commercial vehicles. This Regulation sets the average CO2 emissions for new light commercial vehicles at 1
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. From 2020, this Regulation sets
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation shall apply to motor vehicles of category
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – second paragraph For the purpose of
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 a (new) Article 5a For the calendar year commencing 1 January 2014 and each subsequent calendar year, each manufacturer of light commercial vehicles shall ensure that its light commercial vehicles are equipped with speed limitation devices for which the maximum speed is set at 100 km/h.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) From 2014
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 source: PE-441.217
2010/05/21
ENVI
27 amendments...
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The speed of road vehicles has a strong influence on their fuel consumption and CO2 emissions. In addition, in the absence of speed limitation for light commercial vehicles, it is possible that there is an element of competition as regards top speed which could lead to oversized powertrains and associated inefficiencies in slower operating conditions. It is therefore appropriate to
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation establishes CO2 emissions performance requirements for new light commercial vehicles. This Regulation sets the average CO2 emissions for new light commercial vehicles at 1
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. From 2020, this Regulation sets
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In order to promote low emission vehicles Member States are encouraged to introduce further complementary measures, and in particular to differentiate vehicle taxes, charges and fees based on emission performance.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation shall apply to motor vehicles of category
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 For the purpose of
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – indent 3 Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – introductory part (a) From 2014
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – subpoint i (i)
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – subpoint i – indent 1 Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – subpoint ii – indent 1 Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – subpoint iii Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – subpoint iv Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a – subpoint iv Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part By 1 January 2013, the Commission shall
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1 –
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part On the basis of
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – indent 1 –
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Regulation, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 a (new) Article 12a Amendment to Directive 92/6/EEC The Council Directive 92/6/EEC1 is hereby amended, with effect from …*, as follows: (1) Article 1 shall be replaced by the following: "For the purposes of this Directive, “motor vehicle” means any power-driven vehicle falling within category M2, M3, N1, N2 or N3, intended for use on the road and having at least four wheels and a maximum design speed exceeding 25 km/h." Categories M2, M3, N1, N2 and N3 shall be understood to be those defined in Annex II to Directive 70/156/EEC (*)." (2) Article 2 first subparagraph shall be replaced by the following: "Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that motor vehicles of categories N1, N2, M2 and M3 referred to in Article 1 may be used on the road only if equipped with a speed limitation device set in such a way that their speed cannot exceed 100 kilometres per hour.". ____________ *OJ: one year after the date of entry into force of this Regulation. ____________ 1 OJ L 57, 2.3.1992, p. 27.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – subpoint a – line 2 Indicative specific emissions of CO2 = 1
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – point 1 – subpoint b a (new) (b a) From 2020: Indicative specific emission of CO2 = 125 + a × (M – M0) Where: M = mass of the vehicle in kilograms (kg), or another utility parameter adopted pursuant to Article 12(4) M0 = the value adopted pursuant to Article 12(1) a = the value adopted pursuant to Article 12 (4)
source: PE-442.811
2010/12/05
ITRE
6 amendments...
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 4. By 1 January 2013, the Commission shall
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1 –
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 On the basis of
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – indent 1 –
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Regulation, shall be adopted in accordance with the
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 1 1. The indicative specific emissions of CO2 for each light commercial vehicle, measured in grams per kilometre, shall be determined in accordance with the following formulae: (a) From 2014 to 2017: Indicative specific emissions of CO2 = 1
source: PE-441.272
|
| 2 |
2009/2002(BUD) 2010 budget: section III, Commission
2009/09/09
ITRE
2 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the need to
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for appropriate funding
source: PE-428.000
|
| 100 |
2010/0306(NLE) Management of spent fuel and radioactive waste: EU legal framework
2011/03/22
ENVI
40 amendments...
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive Recital -1 (new) (-1) Article 191 TFEU provides the legal basis for preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment and protecting human health, including from hazards arising from spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Article
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Article
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) The operation of nuclear reactors also generates spent fuel. Each Member State may define its fuel cycle policy considering spent fuel
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 a (new) (25a) Spent fuels stored in pools represent an additional potential source of radioactivity in the environment, in particular if the cooling ponds are not covered anymore, as recently shown in Fukushima.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 b (new) (25b) The management of spent fuels starts at the moment of the fuel rods are moved from the nuclear reactor.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 a (new) (27a) Workers and the general public face an unacceptable and growing risk due to the conditions under which some historic wastes, such as plutonium-bearing sludges or contaminated graphite, are being stored. Unconditioned, readily dispersible waste forms and spent fuel in unprotected pools constitute stores which are radiotoxic as well as being highly vulnerable and pose an ongoing risk of accident or target for terrorist attack.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29)
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) Although each Member State is responsible for its own policy on spent fuel and radioactive waste management, that policy should respect the relevant fundamental safety principles set by the IAEA. It is an ethical obligation of each Member State to avoid any undue burden on future generations in respect of the existing spent fuel and radioactive waste, as well as those expected from decommissioning of existing nuclear installations. Member States should therefore establish a decommissioning policy that guarantees that facilities are dismantled in the safest manner as early as possible after their closure.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 a (new) (34a) Workers along the whole chain of spent fuel and radioactive waste management need to be protected and covered, regardless of their activity or status; the long term effects on the health and safety of workers need to be considered in any management instrument for spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 b (new) (34b) When implementing this Directive, special attention must be given to workers at risk. Non-compliance with health and safety legislation must be followed by immediate and severe sanctions.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Some Member States consider that the sharing of facilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, including storage and/or disposal facilities, is a potentially beneficial option when based on an agreement between Member States concerned. Shared final storage and/or disposal should only be considered for small amounts of radioactive waste from research, medical use or industrial operations other than energy generation.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) The safety case and the graded approach should provide a basis for decisions related to the development, operation and closure of a storage, including spent fuels in pools, and disposal facility and should allow the identification of areas of uncertainty on which attention needs to be focused to further improve the understanding of those aspects influencing the safety of the storage or disposal system, including natural (geological) and engineered barriers, and its expected development over the time. The safety case should include the findings of the safety assessment and information on the robustness and reliability of the safety assessment and the assumptions made therein. The safety case for low-level waste and short-lived intermediate-level waste has to be made for at least 500 years and for high-level waste or spent nuclear fuel for at least 100 000 years. It should therefore provide the collection of arguments and evidence in support of the safety of a facility or activity related to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 a (new) (39a) Union legislation on health and safety at work is also applicable to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 (2) It ensures that Member States provide for appropriate national arrangements for
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) all stages of spent fuel management when the spent fuel results from the operation of
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) all stages of radioactive waste management, from generation up to
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 (2) Waste from extractive industries which may be radioactive and falls within the scope of Directive 2006/21/EC shall
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3 Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 6 (6)
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 10 (10)
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 11 (11)
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 13 (13)
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the generation of radioactive waste is kept to the minimum practicable, in terms of both activity and volume, by means of the use of alternatives where economically, socially and environmentally sustainable alternatives exist, appropriate design measures and of operating and decommissioning practices, including recycle and reuse of conventional materials;
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) spent fuel and radioactive waste are safely managed
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) exposure of workers, the public and the environment to spent fuel and radioactive waste is avoided;
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (db) measures are taken to cover the future health and environmental risks for exposed workers and the general public;
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d c (new) (dc) there is joint and several liability so as to protect all actors involved in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) enforcement actions, including suspension of activities and modification or revocation of a licence
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The competent regulatory authority will have the powers and resources to regularly carry out nuclear safety assessments, investigations and controls, and where necessary enforcement actions in the facilities even during decommissioning. The health and safety of workers, including any sub- contractors, as well as staff levels and training are to form part of these assessments.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 b (new) (3b) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority is empowered to order the suspension of operations in cases where safety is not guaranteed.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 c (new) (3c) The competent regulatory authority will report to the Member States and relevant competent organisations, licence holders, workers’ representatives of the licence holder, sub-contractors and the general public regarding the results of their assessments.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders, under the supervision of the competent regulatory authority, to regularly assess and verify, and continuously improve, as far as reasonably achievable, the safety of their activities
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 (3) The assessments referred to in paragraph 2 shall include verification that measures are in place to prevent accidents and physical attacks and mitigate the consequences of accidents and physical attacks, including verification of the physical barriers and the licence holder
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 (2) The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall cover the siting, design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of a facility or operation of spent fuels pools, a final storage facility or operation and closure of a disposal facility; the safety case shall specify the standards applied for this assessment. The long-term and post-closure safety shall be addressed, in particular how it is ensured by passive means to the fullest extent possible. The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall include an assessment of the health and safety risks for workers, including those employed by subcontractors, and of the skill levels and number of staff required for the safe operation of the facility at all times, so that action can be taken in the event of an accident.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that adequate financial resources are available when needed for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, taking due account of the responsibility of radioactive waste producers, health and safety matters and occupational diseases which might occur in the longer term following radioactive exposure, according to the polluter-pays principle.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is made available to workers and the general public. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations, provided that this does not jeopardise other interests recognised in national legislation or international obligations such as, inter alia, security. Information directly relevant to the health and safety of workers and the public (in particular radioactive and toxic emissions and the exposure to emissions) must be made publicly available irrespective of the circumstances.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 2 (2) concepts, plans and technical solutions from generation to
source: PE-460.954
2011/04/15
ITRE
57 amendments...
Amendment 47 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 2 – having regard to the Treaty
Amendment 49 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Article
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Article 191 TFEU provides for the legal basis for preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment and protecting human health establishment, including from hazards arising from spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Article
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) The operation of nuclear reactors also generates spent fuel. Each Member State may define its fuel cycle policy considering spent fuel
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 a (new) (25a) Spent fuels stored in pools represent an additional potential source of radioactivity in the environment, in particular if the cooling ponds are not covered anymore, as recently shown in Fukushima.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 b (new) (25b) The management of spent fuels starts at the moment of the fuel rods are moved from the nuclear reactor.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 a (new) (27a) Workers and the general public face an unacceptable and growing risk due to the conditions under which some historic wastes, such as plutonium-bearing sludges or contaminated graphite, are being stored. Unconditioned, readily dispersible waste forms and spent fuel in unprotected pools constitute stores which are radiotoxic as well as being highly vulnerable and pose an ongoing risk of accident or target for terrorist attack.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 b (new) (27b) Interim storage of spent fuels requires protection from external events; all spent fuels should therefore be moved out of pools into dry storage as soon as the residual heat level allows.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29)
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 a (new) (29a) The hazards of radioactive waste depositories, in particular spent fuels in pools, were made evident by the Fukushima accident and similar accidents could take place in existing or under construction nuclear installations in areas of the Union and its neighbouring countries with seismic, tsunami and other natural risks. The Union should take any appropriate measures to prevent radioactive waste disposal in such areas.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) Although each Member State is responsible for its own policy on spent fuel and radioactive waste management, that policy should not only respect the relevant fundamental safety principles set by the IAEA
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 a (new) (34a) Workers along the whole chain of spent fuel and radioactive waste management need to be protected and covered, regardless of their activity or status; the long term effects on the health and safety of workers need to be considered in any management instrument for spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 b (new) (34b) When implementing this Directive, special attention must be given to workers at risk; non-compliance with health and safety legislation must be followed by immediate and severe sanctions.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Some Member States consider that the sharing of facilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, including storage and/or disposal facilities, is a potentially beneficial option when based on an agreement between Member States concerned. Shared final storage and/or disposal should only be considered for small amounts of radioactive waste from research, medical use or industrial operations other than energy generation.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 a (new) (37a) Citizens who have not benefited from the production of nuclear waste should not carry the potential environmental burden. Therefore, nuclear waste, including plutonium and spent nuclear fuel should not be exported to third countries for waste storage, reprocessing, MOX fabrication or waste treatment.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) The safety case and the graded approach should provide a basis for decisions related to the development, operation and closure of a storage, including spent fuels in pools, and disposal facility and should allow the identification of areas of uncertainty on which attention needs to be focused to further improve the understanding of those aspects influencing the safety of the storage or disposal system, including natural (geological) and engineered barriers, and its expected development over the time. The safety case should include the findings of the safety assessment and information on the robustness and reliability of the safety assessment and the assumptions made therein. The safety case for low-level waste and short-lived intermediate-level waste has to be made for at least 500 years and for high-level waste or spent nuclear fuel for at least 100 000 years. It should therefore provide the collection of arguments and evidence in support of the safety of a facility or activity related to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 a (new) (39a) Union legislation on health and safety at work is also applicable to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 (2) It ensures that Member States provide for appropriate national arrangements for
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) all stages of spent fuel management when the spent fuel results from the operation of
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) all stages of radioactive waste management, from generation up to
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 (2) Waste from extractive industries which may be radioactive and falls within the scope of Directive 2006/21/EC shall
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3 Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 6 (6)
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 7 (7) ‘radioactive waste management’ means all activities, that relate to handling, pretreatment, treatment, conditioning, storage, or disposal of radioactive waste
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 10 (10)
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 11 (11) ) ‘spent fuel management’ means all activities that relates to the handling, storage including intermediate storage, reprocessing, or disposal of spent fuel,
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 13 (13) ‘storage’ means the holding of spent fuel or of radioactive waste in an authorised facility with the
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall establish and maintain national policies on spent fuel and radioactive waste management.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the generation of radioactive waste is kept to the
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) no undue burdens are imposed on
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) to move all spent fuel out of pools into dry storage;
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) spent fuel and radioactive waste are safely managed
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) exposure of workers, the public and the environment to spent fuel and radioactive waste is avoided.
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (db) measures are taken to cover the future health and environmental risks for exposed workers and the general public.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d c (new) (dc) there is joint and several liability so as to protect all actors involved in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste; full accidents and long-term waste management third party liability in relation to any damage caused by such activities, including damage to the terrestrial, water and marine environments, are borne by the nuclear operators and nuclear waste licensees.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d d (new) (dd) the costs for the management of radioactive waste, including spent fuels, are borne by those who have generated them.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 (3) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel, shall be disposed of in the Member State in which it was generated, unless agreements for small amounts are concluded between Member States which have not developed any activity related to nuclear fuel to use disposal facilities in one of them.
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The export of radioactive waste, including plutonium, and spent fuel to third countries is prohibited.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 b (new) (3b) All nuclear waste facilities in seismic regions or coastal areas with significant risk for rising sea level or a possibility for tsunamis are forbidden.
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) enforcement actions, including suspension of activities and modification or revocation of a licence, covering, inter alia, infringements of health and safety legislation for the workers concerned;
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The competent regulatory authority will have the powers and resources to regularly carry out nuclear safety assessments, investigations and controls, and where necessary enforcement actions in the facilities even during decommissioning. The health and safety of workers, including any sub- contractors, as well as staff levels and training are to form part of these assessments.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 b (new) (3b) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority is empowered to order the suspension of operations in cases where safety is not guaranteed.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 c (new) (3c) The competent regulatory authority will report to the Member States and relevant competent organisations, licence holders, workers’ representatives of the licence holder, sub-contractors and the general public regarding the results of their assessments.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders, under the supervision of the competent regulatory authority, to regularly assess and verify, and continuously improve, as far as reasonably achievable, the safety of their activities
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 (3) The assessments referred to in paragraph 2 shall include verification that measures are in place to prevent accidents and physical attacks and mitigate the consequences of accidents and physical attacks, including verification of the physical barriers and the licence holder
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 (2) The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall cover the siting, design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of a facility or operation of spent fuels pools, a final storage facility or operation and closure of a disposal facility; the safety case shall specify the standards applied for this assessment. The long-term and post-closure safety shall be addressed, in particular how it is ensured by passive means to the fullest extent possible. The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall include an assessment of the health and safety risks for workers, including those employed by subcontractors, and of the skill levels and number of staff required for the safe operation of the facility at all times, so that action can be taken in the event of an accident.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) The Commission shall ensure that a harmonised method of calculation of the costs related to the decommissioning of nuclear installations and the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is established by 31 December 2011.
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 b (new) (1b) Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with the harmonised method referred in para 1a, the costs shall cover at least decommissioning of the installation, safe, long-term management of the conventional and radioactive wastes from decommissioning of the installation; and safe, long-term management of the spent fuel from nuclear power stations and of the wastes from reprocessing operations not already fully covered as an operational cost.
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 c (new) (1c) The decommissioning and waste management funds shall be created from contributions by operators of nuclear installations during their operation, in order to reach a level of resources, at the time of the final shutdown, sufficient to cover all expenses related to decommissioning and waste management as defined in paragraph 1b.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 d (new) (1d) The assets of the funds are to be used only to cover the costs set out in paragraph 1b in line with the decommissioning strategy and may not be used for other purposes. To this end the decommissioning funds shall be duly established with their own legal personality, separate from the operator of the installation.
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 e (new) (1e) These funds must be reviewed and audited annually by independent experts under the authority of the respective national parliament in order to verify that the revenues and the associated interest raised for these future activities shall only be used for these purposes, i.e. for decommissioning or waste management activities, and not used directly or indirectly to fund activities in the market.
source: PE-462.870
2011/04/26
ITRE
3 amendments...
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Member States shall ensure that full third party liability in respect of any damage caused by accidents and long- term radioactive waste management, including damage to the terrestrial, water and marine environments, is borne by the licence holders.
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is made available to workers and the general public. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations, provided that this does not jeopardise other interests recognised in national legislation or international obligations such as, inter alia, security. Information directly relevant to the health and safety of workers and the general public (in particular radioactive and toxic emissions and the exposure to emissions) shall be made publicly available irrespective of the circumstances.
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 2 (2) concepts, plans and technical solutions from generation to
source: PE-462.874
|
| 27 |
2011/0363(NLE) Nuclear decommissioning assistance programmes 2014-2020 in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia
2012/04/10
ITRE
27 amendments...
Amendment 41 #
Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Underlines the European Court of Auditors'1 conclusions that the main decommissioning process in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia is still ahead and its finalisation faces a significant funding shortfall (around 2,5 billion euro), in particular major infrastructure projects have faced delays and cost-overruns in the main decommissioning process, cost estimates are not complete in the absence of key information on radioactive waste and/or the facilities and technologies required for their treatment, the Commission's supervision has focused on the budgetary execution and project implementation rather than on the achievement of the programme objectives as a whole. __________________ 1 ECA special report 16/2011 on EU financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia
Amendment 44 #
Recital 5 b (new) (5b) Notes with deep concern the European Court of Auditors' conclusion that a broad variety of activities to mitigate the consequences of the nuclear reactors' early closure has been financed but the degree of mitigation achieved is not known; recalls that a high share of the EU funds were used until now for energy projects and not for the main aim of the financial assistance, namely nuclear power plants decommissioning; since the funds were not always used for the purposes for which they were intended, this Regulation should only support programmes for the decommissioning and dismantling of nuclear power plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia.
Amendment 48 #
Recital 6 (6) Following the request for further funding from Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia, provision has been made in the Commission proposal for the next Multi- Annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020: ‘'A Budget for Europe 2020’‘5 for a sum of EUR 700 million from the general budget of the European Union for nuclear safety and decommissioning. From this the amount EUR 500 million in 2011 prices which is about EUR 553 million in the current prices is foreseen for a new Programme to further support the decommissioning of the Bohunice V1 units 1-2 and the Ignalina units 1-2
Amendment 57 #
Recital 7 (7) The support covered by this Regulation should only ensure seamless continuation of decommissioning and concentrate on measures to reach an irreversible state within the safe decommissioning and dismantling process, as such bringing the greatest Union added value, while ensuring the transition towards Member State funding for the completion of d
Amendment 59 #
Recital 7 a (new) (7a) As little progress has been made with regard to the final disposal of irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, and with a view to ending the export of these waste and the reprocessing of irradiated fuel elements abroad, the Union recognises also the need to expedite progress in this regards by means of financial support.
Amendment 65 #
Article 1 This Regulation establishes the multi- annual Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programme 2014 - 2020 (‘the Programme’) laying down rules for the implementation of the Union's financial support for measures connected with the irreversible decommissioning of the Kozloduy (units 1 to 4; the Kozloduy Programme), Ignalina (units 1 and 2; the Ignalina Programme) and Bohunice V1 (units 1 and 2; the Bohunice Programme) nuclear power plants only.
Amendment 67 #
Article 1 a (new) Article 1a Definition Decommissioning covers preparatory activities prior to the final shut-down (such as elaboration of a decommissioning plan, preparing the licensing documentation and waste infrastructure projects) and all activities after the reactors are shut down, i.e. the removal and the final disposal of spent fuel elements, the decontamination, dismantling and/or demolition of the nuclear installations, the disposal of remaining radioactive waste materials and the environmental restoration of the contaminated site. The decommissioning process ends when the installation is released from any regulatory control and radiological restriction.
Amendment 69 #
Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The general objective of the Programme is to assist the Member States concerned to reach an irreversible state within the decommissioning and dismantling process of Kozloduy units 1 to 4, Ignalina units 1 and 2 and Bohunice V1 units 1 and 2 nuclear power plants,
Amendment 77 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii (iii) safely managing at national level the decommissioning waste, including irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, in accordance with a detailed national waste management plan, to be measured by the quantity and type of conditioned waste;
Amendment 79 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii a (new) (iiia) commission and establishment of a national repository for safely managing the long term storage and final disposal of the removed irradiated fuel elements and all other radioactive waste resulting from the decommissioning and the dismantling of Kozloduy units 1 to 4, to be measured by the quantity and type of stored and disposed waste;
Amendment 81 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii (iii) performing dismantling in the turbine hall and other auxiliary buildings and safely managing at national level the decommissioning waste, including irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, in accordance with a detailed national waste management plan, to be measured by the
Amendment 83 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii a (new) (iiia) commission and establishment of a national repository for safely managing the long term storage and disposal of the removed irradiated fuel elements and all other radioactive waste resulting from the decommissioning and the dismantling of Ignalina units 1 and 2, to be measured by the quantity and type of stored and disposed waste;
Amendment 86 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iii b (new) (iiib) Dismantling of reactor cores, reactor buildings and primary circuits;
Amendment 87 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii (iii) safely managing at national level the decommissioning waste, including irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, in accordance with a detailed national waste management plan, to be measured by the quantity and type of conditioned waste;
Amendment 89 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii a (new) (iiia) commission and establishment of a national repository for safely managing the long term storage and disposal of the removed irradiated fuel elements and all other radioactive waste resulting from the decommissioning and the dismantling of Bohunice VI units 1 and 2, to be measured by the quantity and type of stored and disposed waste;
Amendment 90 #
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii b (new) (iiib) Dismantling of reactor cores, reactor buildings and primary circuits;
Amendment 103 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) EUR [229 629 000] for the Ignalina Programme for the period 2014 to 20
Amendment 107 #
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c (c) EUR [114 815 000] for the Bohunice Programme for the period 2014 to 20
Amendment 111 #
Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission will review the performance of the Programme and assess the progress of the Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice Programmes against the milestones and target dates referred to in Art 2.3 by the end of 2015 within the framework of the interim evaluation referred to in Art. 8. Based on the results of this assessment, the Commission
Amendment 127 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) Establish a national legal framework to provide adequate
Amendment 129 #
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) Submit to the Commission a revised detailed decommissioning plan, including concrete milestones and proven boundary conditions for Union added value, which leads to achieve timely real physical progress in defueling and decommissioning and ensuring that the closure is irreversible.
Amendment 135 #
Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall assess the information provided on the fulfilment of the ex ante conditionalities when preparing the 2014 annual work programme as referred to in Article 6(1). It
Amendment 147 #
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission shall ensure the implementation of this Regulation and shall submit a yearly progress report on the implementation of the joint annual work programmes as referred to in paragraph 1 to the European Parliament and the Council. It shall carry out an interim evaluation, as provided for in Article 8 (1).
Amendment 161 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. No later than end 2015, an interim evaluation report shall be established by the Commission on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures, at the level of results and impacts, the efficiency of the use of resources and its Union added value, in view of a decision amending or suspending the measures. The evaluation shall additionally address the scope for simplification, its internal and external coherence, the continued relevance of all objectives. It shall take into account evaluation results on the long-term impact of the predecessor measures.
Amendment 162 #
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. No later than 31 December 2018, the Commission shall carry out a second interim evaluation report based on the same criteria as referred to in paragraph 1. The second interim evaluation report shall also examine the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programme and its impact on decommissioning. On the basis of that report, the Commission shall submit, if appropriate, proposals to continue the Programme beyond 2020.
Amendment 167 #
Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. Evaluations shall take account of progress against performance indicators as referred to in Article 2(2) and against the ability of Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia to finance alone the nuclear power plants decommissioning, including radioactive waste and irradiated fuel elements as referred to in Article 4(1)(b) after 2020 at the latest.
Amendment 168 #
Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall
source: PE-496.524
|
| 25 |
2011/0414(CNS) Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation 2014-2020
2012/06/09
ITRE
25 amendments...
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The Chernobyl accident in 1986 highlighted the global importance of nuclear safety. The Fukushima Daiichi accident in 2011 confirmed th
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) In order to maintain and promote the continuous improvement of nuclear safety and its regulation, the Council adopted Directive 2009/71/Euratom of 25 June 2009 establishing a Community framework for nuclear safety of nuclear installations. The Council also adopted Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) In all the regions to which the Cooperation mechanism has been extended since 2007 (i.e. ENP-South, Latin America, Asia), several new INSC projects are either stalled or cancelled, and countries with important nuclear developments (such as India, Brazil or GCC countries) do not show interest to cooperate under the INSC. Taking into account past experiences, this new Cooperation mechanism at nuclear power plants level should therefore be addressed in particular in EU-neighbouring countries.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) A total budget of €524 million has been allocated to the INSC for the period 2007 - 2013 to support EU activities and promote nuclear safety, radiation protection and effective nuclear safeguards worldwide. About half of this amount was devoted to the Chernobyl Funds. The last payments to these funds are expected to be realised until the end of 2013. There will be therefore no need for EU contributions to the Chernobyl Funds in the 2014 -2020 perspectives. A partial reallocation of the proposed €631.1 million of the new INSC for the period of 2014 - 2020 will therefore go to the remediation of the Fukushima Daiichi site and to radioprotection.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 The European Union shall finance measures to support the promotion of a high level of nuclear safety, radiation protection and the application of efficient and effective safeguards of nuclear material
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) promotion of an effective nuclear safety culture and implementation of the highest nuclear safety standards and radiation protection in particular in the EU neighbourhood and accession countries operating nuclear power plants at the date of entry into force of this Regulation;
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, decommissioning and remediation of former nuclear sites and installations in third countries;
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) the degree to which the assisted countries have developed the highest level of safety in nuclear installations to a standard that reflects the state of the art practices in the EU in technical, regulatory and operational respects,
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) status of development of the spent fuel, nuclear waste and decommissioning strategies, the number and importance of the remediation of former nuclear sites and installations, the respective legislative and regulatory framework and implementation of projects;
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The financial reference amount for the implementation of this Regulation over the period 2014 to 2020 is EUR [316 000 000 - 631 100 000].
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 (new) At least EUR 315 100 000 is earmarked to the stabilisation and the remediation of the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear site, to radioprotection and food safety in Japan.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Specific supported measures – point a – introductory part (a) The establishment and the promotion of an effective nuclear safety culture and implementation of the highest nuclear safety standards that reflect the state of the art practices and radiation protection at all levels, in particular through:
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Specific supported measures – point a – indent 1 – continuous support for regulatory bodies, technical support organisations, and the reinforcement of the regulatory framework, notably concerning licensing activities, including the review and
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Specific supported measures – point a – indent 4 Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Criteria – 1. General criteria – indent 1 – Cooperation
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Criteria – 1. General criteria – indent 7 – Cooperation in the fields of nuclear safety and safeguards under this Regulation is not aimed at promoting nuclear energy or extending the lifetime of existing nuclear power plants.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Criteria – 2. Countries with installed nuclear generating capacity – paragraph In the case of
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Criteria – 2. Countries with installed nuclear generating capacity – paragraph 1 a (new) In the case of all third countries with installed nuclear generating capacity, the cooperation programmes should prioritise decommissioning of existing installations, the stabilisation and/or remediation of former nuclear sites, radiation protection and food safety, in particular following a major nuclear accident, and legacy sites related to uranium mining, as well as the recovery and management of sunken radioactive objects and material at sea, when these constitute a danger to the public.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Criteria – 2. Countries with installed nuclear generating capacity – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the degree of urgency of intervention in a given country, in the light of the situation as regards nuclear safety and security
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Criteria – 2. Countries with installed nuclear generating capacity – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Criteria – 3. Countries without installed nuclear generating capacity – paragraph 1 In the case of countries which
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Criteria – 3. Countries without installed nuclear generating capacity – paragraph 2 Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Criteria – 3. Countries without installed nuclear generating capacity – paragraph 3 Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Priorities – paragraphs 1 and 2 Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Priorities – paragraph 3 Cooperation with owners and/or operators of nuclear installations in third countries
source: PE-491.225
|
| 2 |
2011/2012(INI) Analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage
2011/03/31
ENVI
2 amendments...
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas a reduction target of 40% for 2020 for the EU compared to 1990 would be more in line with science and maintaining climate change to 2°C;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls for the Commission to come forward with proposals to move to a domestic 30% greenhouse gas reduction target for 2020 as soon as possible, and at the latest by the end of 2011;
source: PE-462.566
|
| 14 |
2011/2132(INI) Recommendations to the Council, the Commission and the EEAS on the negotiations on the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement
2011/09/23
AFET
14 amendments...
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas before giving its consent to the Association Agreement the European Parliament must take in due account and thoroughly evaluate whether Ukraine has made progress in the fields of democratic reforms, respect of the rule of law and fundamental rights,
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the Ukrainian political and state leadership has repeatedly confirmed its commitment to European integration and its long-term ambition to enable Ukraine to become a Member State of the European Union; whereas this goal continues to be supported by all actors on the Ukrainian political stage as well by Ukrainian civil society and public opinion; whereas the increase in cooperation between the Ukraine and Members of the European Parliament, and between the Ukraine and parliaments of the EU Member States, is a commendable example of different political forces working together to advance Ukraine
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas Ukraine
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the Russian Federation is exercising excessive pressure on Ukraine not to establish a DCFTA with the European Union but instead to join a Customs Union with Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan, countries outside the WTO which still constitute a major export market for Ukrainian products; whereas the DCFTA is a tool for modernisation and its establishment could offer
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point a (a) to make all necessary progress in order to achieve the
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) to express concern about the deterioration of respect for the rule of law and fundamental freedoms with regard, in particular, to freedom of the media, freedom of assembly and democratic standards;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) to assist Ukraine in the process of achieving a comprehensive reform of the judiciary in order to guarantee an independent, fair and impartial legal procedure;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point g b (new) (gb) to assist the Ukrainian authorities in the process of reforming the Constitution and the electoral law along the lines proposed by the Venice Commission;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (ha) to stress the importance of the implementation of all the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights and draw the attention of the Ukrainian authorities to the high number of cases against Ukraine pending in this court;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point k a (new) (ka) to ensure that the Ukrainian authorities fully respect the targets set in the energy efficiency programme for the period 2010-15 by modernising the electric grid and adopting relevant laws with a view to enhancing energy conservation and reducing greenhouse gases emissions; to provide the necessary technical assistance in order to improve radically the energy efficiency of Ukraine’s electricity grid;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point k b (new) (kb) to urge the Ukrainian government to step up efforts on climate protection by committing to clear and ambitious targets in line with EU targets and, to this end, to urgently undertake the necessary switch to a sustainable energy economy based on renewable energy sources and energy efficiency while phasing out polluting and dependence-increasing fossil fuels and risky nuclear energy;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point k c (new) (kc) to raise the issue of the exploitation of shale gas and the obligations to follow strictly European standards with regard, in particular, to the environmental impact assessment;
source: PE-472.290
|
| 52 |
2012/0190(COD) Reducing CO2 emissions from new passenger cars: modalities for reaching the 2020 target
2013/02/28
ENVI
26 amendments...
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Introducing a further target of 60 CO2 g/km for 2025 is needed to ensure a predictable policy framework for car manufacturers in the framework of the necessary continued fuel efficiency improvement of cars beyond 2020, in line with the decarbonisation of the transport sector as part of the Union's climate objectives.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) It is appropriate to clarify that for the purpose of verifying compliance with the target of 95gCO2/km, CO2 emissions should continue to be measured in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information10 and its implementing measures and innovative technologies. However, studies carried out by the Commission have demonstrated that the test procedures used to measure CO2 emissions under that Regulation have not prevented an increased utilisation of flexibilities by manufacturers which has resulted in alleged CO2 emissions reductions that are not attributed to technological improvements and cannot be achieved in real driving on the road. Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 should be reviewed as a matter of urgency in order to ensure that test procedures reflect adequately the real CO2 emissions behaviour of cars.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In recognition of the high research and development and unit production costs of early generations of ultra-low carbon vehicles it is appropriate to accelerate and facilitate, on an interim basis and to a limited extent, the process of their introduction into the Union market at their initial stages of commercialization through accounting such vehicles as having zero emissions until 2025.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Whilst the use of certain alternative fuels can offer significant CO2 reductions in a life-cycle perspective, it has been recognised that the CO2 emissions arising from the production of such alternative fuels can be higher than those of conventional fuels. The upstream emissions of all vehicles, including alternative-fuelled vehicles, should therefore be considered as their market share increases. For the period beyond 2025 the Commission should therefore introduce metrics that take into account upstream greenhouse gas emissions.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The Regulation requires the Commission to carry out an impact assessment in order to review the test procedures to reflect adequately the real CO2 emissions behaviour of cars. This work is proceeding through the development of a World Light Duty Test procedure (WLTP) in the framework of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) In order to provide a sufficient incentive to introduce improvements reducing specific emissions of CO2 from passenger cars, the excess emissions premium should be adjusted to reflect technological costs and likely upper marginal costs of compliance with this Regulation.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in order to supplement the rules on derogations from the specific emissions targets, to amend data requirements for the purpose of monitoring of CO2 emissions and to adjust the formulae for calculating the specific CO2 emissions in Annex I to changes in the vehicle mass and footprint value and the regulatory test procedure for the measurement of specific CO2 emissions referred to in Regulation (EC) No 715/2007. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) The Commission has assessed the availability of footprint data and its use as the utility parameter in the formulae in Annex I. This data is available and its potential use has been assessed in the impact assessment
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 1 – paragraph 2 From 2020 onwards, this Regulation sets a target of
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) (1a) In Article 1, the following paragraph is added: „From 2025, this Regulation sets a target of 60 g CO2/km as average emissions for the new car fleet as measured in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and its implementing measures and Annex XII to Regulation (EC) No 692/2008.”
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 5a Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new) (4a) In Article 8, the following paragraph is inserted: "4a. Where as a result of the verification of the conformity of production, a Member State, in accordance with Article 12(3) of Directive 2007/46/EC, establishes that the CO2 emissions for a production vehicle deviate significantly from the approved type, that deviation shall be reported to the Commission together with the detailed data specified in Annex II to this Regulation. The specific emissions of CO2 for the vehicle type for which a deviation has been established shall be adjusted accordingly in the calculation of the average specific emissions of CO2 in the following calendar year."
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 b (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 8 – paragraph 4 b (new) (4b) In Article 8, the following paragraph is inserted: "4b. The Commission shall monitor real reported CO2 emission values by vehicle type and manufacturer on the basis of the best available sources of information and shall publish in its annual monitoring reports how those values compare with type approval values.”
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 5 a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (5a) In Article 9(2), point (b) is replaced by the following: „From 2009: (Excess emissions × EUR 130/g CO2/km) × number of new passenger cars.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 7 – point a a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (aa) In paragraph 4, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: "An application for a derogation from the specific emissions target calculated in accordance with Annex I may be made by a manufacturer which is responsible, together with all of its connected undertakings, for between 10 000 and 100 000 new passenger cars registered in the Union per calendar year."
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 7 – point c a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) In paragraph 4, second subparagraph, the following point is added: „(ca) if the application is in relation to point (d) of Annex I, point 1, a target which is a 65 % reduction on the average specific emissions of CO2 in 2007 or, where a single application is made in respect of a number of connected undertakings, a 65 % reduction on the average of those undertakings' average specific emissions of CO2 in 2007.”
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – point a a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1a (new) (aa) In paragraph 3, the following subparagraph is added: "With a view to ensuring that real world emissions are adequately reflected and measured CO2 values are strictly comparable, the Commission shall, in accordance with Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, ensure that those elements in the testing procedure that have a significant influence on measured CO2 emissions are strictly defined in order to prevent the utilisation of test cycle flexibilities by manufacturers. Where variation is permitted in any of the factors within the overall testing procedure that influence the measured CO2 emissions, the Commission shall ensure that that it incorporates an adjustment calculation for each of those variables in the test procedures, which shall be used to adjust the measured values so as to compensate for the variation in the factors and so normalise measured emissions."
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – point a b (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1b (new) (ab) In paragraph 3, the following subparagraph is added: "For the purpose of verifying that the CO2 emissions of production vehicles conform to the values of the approved type, it shall be ensured that the aerodynamic and rolling resistance values are obtained from the vehicle for which conformity of production is being verified."
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – point b Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – point b a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new) (ba) The following paragraph 3a is inserted: "(3a) The Commission shall consider the benefit of ensuring that type approval CO2 values include emissions resulting from the use of the main energy using devices of the vehicle and, if appropriate, make proposals for this to take effect in the period beyond 2020."
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – point c Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 13 – paragraph 5 5. By 31 December 2014, the Commission shall
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation 2009/443/EC Annex I – point 1 – point c – formula Specific emissions of CO2 =
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation 2009/443/EC Annex I – point 1 – point c – definition of the value "M" Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation 2009/443/EC Annex I – point 1 – point c – definition of the value "M0" Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation 2009/443/EC Annex I – point 1 – point c – value of letter "a" in the formula a =
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Annex I – point 1 – point ca (new) (13a) In point 1 of Annex I, the following point is added: "(ca) From 2025: Specific emissions of CO2 = 60 + a × (F – F0) Where: F = footprint of the vehicle in square meters (m2) F 0 = the value adopted pursuant to Article 13(2) a = slope corresponding to 60%."
source: PE-506.077
2013/03/22
ENVI
26 amendments...
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Introducing a further target of 60 CO2 g/km for 2025 is needed to ensure a predictable policy framework for car manufacturers in the framework of the necessary continued fuel efficiency improvement of cars beyond 2020, in line with the decarbonisation of the transport sector as part of the Union's climate objectives.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) It is appropriate to clarify that for the purpose of verifying compliance with the target of 95gCO2/km, CO2 emissions should continue to be measured in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information10 and its implementing measures and innovative technologies. However, studies carried out by the Commission have demonstrated that the test procedures used to measure CO2 emissions under that Regulation have not prevented an increased utilisation of flexibilities by manufacturers which has resulted in alleged CO2 emissions reductions that are not attributed to technological improvements and cannot be achieved in real driving on the road. Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 should be reviewed as a matter of urgency in order to ensure that test procedures reflect adequately the real CO2 emissions behaviour of cars.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) In recognition of the high research and development and unit production costs of early generations of ultra-low carbon vehicles it is appropriate to accelerate and facilitate, on an interim basis and to a limited extent, the process of their introduction into the Union market at their initial stages of commercialization through accounting such vehicles as having zero emissions until 2025.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Whilst the use of certain alternative fuels can offer significant CO2 reductions in a life-cycle perspective, it has been recognised that the CO2 emissions arising from the production of such alternative fuels can be higher than those of conventional fuels. The upstream emissions of all vehicles, including alternative-fuelled vehicles, should therefore be considered as their market share increases. For the period beyond 2025 the Commission should therefore introduce metrics that take into account upstream greenhouse gas emissions.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The Regulation requires the Commission to carry out an impact assessment in order to review the test procedures to reflect adequately the real CO2 emissions behaviour of cars. This work is proceeding through the development of a World Light Duty Test procedure (WLTP) in the framework of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) In order to provide a sufficient incentive to introduce improvements reducing specific emissions of CO2 from passenger cars, the excess emissions premium should be adjusted to reflect technological costs and likely upper marginal costs of compliance with this Regulation.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in order to supplement the rules on derogations from the specific emissions targets, to amend data requirements for the purpose of monitoring of CO2 emissions and to adjust the formulae for calculating the specific CO2 emissions in Annex I to changes in the vehicle mass and footprint value and the regulatory test procedure for the measurement of specific CO2 emissions referred to in Regulation (EC) No 715/2007. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) The Commission has assessed the availability of footprint data and its use as the utility parameter in the formulae in Annex I. This data is available and its potential use has been assessed in the impact assessment
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 1 – paragraph 2 From 2020 onwards, this Regulation sets a target of
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) (1a) In Article 1, the following paragraph is added: „From 2025, this Regulation sets a target of 60 g CO2/km as average emissions for the new car fleet as measured in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 and its implementing measures and Annex XII to Regulation (EC) No 692/2008.”
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 5a Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new) (4a) In Article 8, the following paragraph is inserted: "4a. Where as a result of the verification of the conformity of production, a Member State, in accordance with Article 12(3) of Directive 2007/46/EC, establishes that the CO2 emissions for a production vehicle deviate significantly from the approved type, that deviation shall be reported to the Commission together with the detailed data specified in Annex II to this Regulation. The specific emissions of CO2 for the vehicle type for which a deviation has been established shall be adjusted accordingly in the calculation of the average specific emissions of CO2 in the following calendar year."
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 b (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 8 – paragraph 4 b (new) (4b) In Article 8, the following paragraph is inserted: "4b. The Commission shall monitor real reported CO2 emission values by vehicle type and manufacturer on the basis of the best available sources of information and shall publish in its annual monitoring reports how those values compare with type approval values.”
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 5 a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b (5a) In Article 9(2), point (b) is replaced by the following: „From 2009: (Excess emissions × EUR 130/g CO2/km) × number of new passenger cars.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 7 – point a a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (aa) In paragraph 4, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: "An application for a derogation from the specific emissions target calculated in accordance with Annex I may be made by a manufacturer which is responsible, together with all of its connected undertakings, for between 10 000 and 100 000 new passenger cars registered in the Union per calendar year."
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 7 – point c a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) In paragraph 4, second subparagraph, the following point is added: „(ca) if the application is in relation to point (d) of Annex I, point 1, a target which is a 65 % reduction on the average specific emissions of CO2 in 2007 or, where a single application is made in respect of a number of connected undertakings, a 65 % reduction on the average of those undertakings' average specific emissions of CO2 in 2007.”
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – point a a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1a (new) (aa) In paragraph 3, the following subparagraph is added: "With a view to ensuring that real world emissions are adequately reflected and measured CO2 values are strictly comparable, the Commission shall, in accordance with Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2007, ensure that those elements in the testing procedure that have a significant influence on measured CO2 emissions are strictly defined in order to prevent the utilisation of test cycle flexibilities by manufacturers. Where variation is permitted in any of the factors within the overall testing procedure that influence the measured CO2 emissions, the Commission shall ensure that that it incorporates an adjustment calculation for each of those variables in the test procedures, which shall be used to adjust the measured values so as to compensate for the variation in the factors and so normalise measured emissions."
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – point a b (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1b (new) (ab) In paragraph 3, the following subparagraph is added: "For the purpose of verifying that the CO2 emissions of production vehicles conform to the values of the approved type, it shall be ensured that the aerodynamic and rolling resistance values are obtained from the vehicle for which conformity of production is being verified."
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – point b Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – point b a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new) (ba) The following paragraph 3a is inserted: "(3a) The Commission shall consider the benefit of ensuring that type approval CO2 values include emissions resulting from the use of the main energy using devices of the vehicle and, if appropriate, make proposals for this to take effect in the period beyond 2020."
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – point c Regulation 2009/443/EC Article 13 – paragraph 5 5. By 31 December 2014, the Commission shall
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation 2009/443/EC Annex I – point 1 – point c – formula Specific emissions of CO2 =
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation 2009/443/EC Annex I – point 1 – point c – definition of the value "M" Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation 2009/443/EC Annex I – point 1 – point c – definition of the value "M0" Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation 2009/443/EC Annex I – point 1 – point c – value of letter "a" in the formula a =
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 a (new) Regulation 2009/443/EC Annex I – point 1 – point ca (new) (13a) In point 1 of Annex I, the following point is added: "(ca) From 2025: Specific emissions of CO2 = 60 + a × (F – F0) Where: F = footprint of the vehicle in square meters (m2) F 0 = the value adopted pursuant to Article 13(2) a = slope corresponding to 60%."
source: PE-506.077
|
Rebecca HARMS on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
Term 6 20.07.2004 - 13.07.2009
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |