Rainer WIELAND
Constituencies
-
Germany
Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
Germany
Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Germany
Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Germany
Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
Germany
Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
Germany
Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
1997/10/10 - 1999/07/19
-
Germany
Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
1997/10/10 - 1999/07/19
Groups
-
PPE
Member of the Bureau
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
2009/07/21 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
2009/07/14 - 2009/07/20
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian-Democratic Group)
1997/10/10 - 1999/07/19
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian-Democratic Group)
1997/10/10 - 1999/07/19
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
EP staff
- Vice-President of European Parliament 2012/01/18 - 9999/12/31
- Member of Parliament's Bureau 2012/01/18 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier staff positions...
- Vice-President of European Parliament 2009/07/14 - 2012/01/16
- Member of Parliament's Bureau 2009/07/14 - 2012/01/16
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Petitions | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Member of | Committee on Legal Affairs | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Constitutional Affairs | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 2007/03/26 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with India | 2007/03/15 | 2007/03/25 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2006/12/31 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 2002/02/06 | 2004/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Latvia Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2002/03/07 | 2004/04/30 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 1999/09/14 | 2002/01/14 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Latvia Joint Parliamentary Committee | 1999/11/11 | 2002/01/14 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 1997/10/23 | 1999/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 1999/02/24 | 1999/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 1997/12/01 | 1999/02/23 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Russia | 1997/10/17 | 1997/11/30 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Russia | 1997/10/17 | 1997/11/30 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 1997/10/23 | 1999/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 1997/12/01 | 1999/02/23 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 1999/02/24 | 1999/07/19 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 1999/09/14 | 2002/01/14 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Latvia Joint Parliamentary Committee | 1999/11/11 | 2002/01/14 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 2002/02/06 | 2004/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Latvia Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2002/03/07 | 2004/04/30 |
| Member of | Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2006/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with India | 2007/03/15 | 2007/03/25 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 2007/03/26 | 2009/07/13 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://www.mdep.de
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 47545
- Fax
- +322 28 49545
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 10E130
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 77545
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79545
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T12037
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Europäisches Parlament
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 10E130
- B-1047 Brüssel
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2011/2257(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 196: provisions concerning plenary sittings applicable in committee |
| Shadow | 2009/2212(INI) | Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament on the detailed provisions governing the exercise of the European Parliament's right of inquiry replacing the Decision of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 19 April 1995 (95/167/EC, Euratom, ECSC) |
| Responsible | 2008/2072(INI) | Special report from the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament following the draft recommendation to the Council of the European Union in complaint 1487/2005/GG |
| Opinion | 2005/0245(COD) | Community payments market: common framework for the integration and the rationalisation of national payment systems (amend. Directives 97/7/EC, 2000/12/EC and 2002/65/EC) |
| Opinion | 2005/0128(CNS) | Strengthening the criminal law framework to combat intellectual property offences. Framework Decision |
| Opinion | 2005/0127(COD) | Criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights |
| Responsible | 2004/2090(INI) | Deliberations of the Committee of petitions in 2003 and 2004 |
| Opinion | 2001/2197(COS) | Monitoring the application of Community law. 18th annual report 2000, 19th annual report 2001 |
| Opinion | 2001/2040(REG) | EP Rules of procedure: general revision |
| Opinion | 2001/0174(COD) | Cross-border payments in euro: reducing bank charges |
| Opinion | 2001/0063(CNS) | Manufactured tobacco: structure and rates of excise duty (amend. Directives 92/79/EEC, 92/80/EEC, 95/59/EC) |
| Responsible | 2001/0004(COD) | Machinery, lifts: marketing, safety, health and consumers protection (repeal. Directive 98/37/EC, amend. Directive 95/16/EC). Recast |
| Opinion | 2000/2018(COS) | Internal market: small value or retail cross-border payments |
| Opinion | 1997/2244(COS) | EC Treaty procedures under Article 189b, codecision: revision following the Amsterdam Treaty |
| Responsible | 1997/0345(COD) | Professional qualifications, recognition: doctor, dentist, architect...(amend. direct. 89/48/EEC, 92/51/EEC) |
Born
1957/02/19 Stuttgart - Bad Cannstatt- Studied law; under articles in Tübingen, Heidelberg and Stuttgart.
- Local chair of Junge Union, Gerlingen (1975-1980); chair of the Ludwigsburg JU district association (1981-1983); district vice-chair of the North Württemberg JU (1985-1988); district vice-chair of the North Württemberg JU (1990-1992); member, CDU Federal Party Committee (1983-1991); Member, North Württemberg CDU District Association (since 1991). Chair, Ludwigsburg CDU District Association (since 1993). Chairman of the Baden-Württemberg branch of the all-party Europa Union (since 2001).
- Member, Gerlingen Municipal Council (1984-1998). Member, Ludwigsburg District Council (1984-1998). Member, Stuttgart Regional Association Assembly (since 1994).
- Member of the European Parliament (since 1997).
- Vice-President of European Movement International (EMI) (2008-2011).
- President of the all-party Europa Union Germany (since 2011).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 18 |
2009/2134(INI) Proposal for a modification of the Act concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage of 20 September 1976
2011/03/14
AFCO
12 amendments...
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital T T. Parliament's electoral procedure must
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Repeats its proposal to bring forward the timing of the election from June to May; calls on the Council, after consulting Parliament, to determine the date of the 2014 European elections by 31.12.2011 at the latest;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that, in view of Article 17(7) of the Lisbon Treaty and the fact that the European public knows more about Members of the European Commission than they used to, the candidature and eligibility of Commissioners-in-office and members of other bodies in Article 7 of the ‘Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage’ of 20 September 1976 should be regulated in such a way that no short-term and short-lasting personnel reshuffles are carried out in the time context of a European Parliament election and institutional appointments;
Amendment 98 #
Rule 14 – paragraph 2 2. The European Parliament shall be composed of representatives of the Union's citizens. 2a. The
Amendment 108 #
Article 9 Amendment 116 #
Article 2 a (new) Article 2a 1. For the purposes of distributing seats between Member States in accordance with the principle of degressive proportionality pursuant to Article 14(2a) of the Treaty on European Union, the seats allocated to each Member State shall be distributed on the basis of the Union population of the States in accordance with the procedure described below. 2. Each Member State will first be assigned 6 seats. 3. The remaining seats, up to the ceiling of 750, will be assigned to the individual Member States on the basis of their population statistics using the 'd'Hondt system'. Member States which have attained a maximum of 96 seats in total will no longer be taken into account in the further allocation.
Amendment 121 #
Article 3 1. Member States may set a minimum threshold for the allocation of seats distributed in national and/or regional constituencies. At national level this threshold may not exceed 5 per cent of votes cast. 2. The European Parliament shall be responsible for setting the minimum threshold in the constituency described in Article 2b(1).
Amendment 124 #
Article 4 Each Member State may set a ceiling for
Amendment 126 #
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 a (new) – member of a national or regional parliament with legislative powers,
Amendment 133 #
Article 13 a (new) Article 13a 1. In the case of the Members elected in the Member States, and subject to the other provisions of this Act, each State shall lay down appropriate procedures for filling any seat which falls vacant during the five-year term of office referred to in Article 5 for the remainder of that period. The provisions of Article 3(1a) shall apply mutatis mutandis. 2. Where the law of a Member State provides for a temporary replacement of a member of its national parliament on maternity leave, that State may decide that such provisions are to apply mutatis mutandis to the Members of the European Parliament elected in that State.
source: PE-460.673
2011/10/11
AFCO
6 amendments...
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S S. Parliament’s electoral procedure must, like the procedure for the nomination of candidates by parties at national level, uphold the practice of free, fair and secret elections, achieve overall proportionality of representation, and be durable and comprehensible,
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point (ii) (ii) Proposes to enter into a dialogue with the European Council
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Determines to bring forward the timing of the European elections from June to May; insists that the date of the 2014 European elections be fixed by 31.03.2012 at the latest;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Considers that, in view of Article 17(7) of the Lisbon Treaty and the fact that the European public knows more about Members of the European Commission than they used to, the candidature and eligibility of Commissioners-in-office and members of other bodies in Article 7 of the ‘Act concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage’ annexed to the Council decision of 20 September 1976 (amended version) should be regulated in such a way that no short-term and short- lasting personnel reshuffles are carried out in the time context of a European Parliament election and institutional appointments;
Amendment 41 #
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 a (new) - member of a national or regional parliament with legislative powers,
Amendment 43 #
Article 9 source: PE-475.840
|
| 17 |
2009/2212(INI) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament on the detailed provisions governing the exercise of the European Parliament's right of inquiry replacing the Decision of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 19 April 1995 (95/167/EC, Euratom, ECSC)
2011/09/15
AFCO
17 amendments...
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2a (new) Detailed arrangements shall be laid down in Parliament’s Rules of Procedure.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) its composition based on a balanced representation of political forces, in accordance with Parliament’s Rules of Procedure;
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the time-limit for submission of its report, which shall not exceed [twelve] months from the date on which it first meets, without prejudice to extensions of time under paragraph 4.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the time-limit for submission of its report, which shall not exceed [twelve] months
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Parliament’s Rules of Procedure shall, for all future committees of inquiry in a given parliamentary term, lay down in advance the procedure whereby the various political groups shall have the right to propose the committee chair.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point c (c) in any event, at the close of the parliamentary term when the newly elected Parliament first meets.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Renewed inquiries A temporary committee of inquiry may not be set up or re-established with regard to matters into which an inquiry has already been held by a temporary committee of inquiry until at least twelve months have elapsed since the submission of the report on that inquiry or the end of its assignment and unless any new facts have emerged. A committee may be set up in any case where new and serious facts have emerged that may be deemed likely to alter substantive findings.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Exceptionally, proceedings shall take place in camera if this is requested by [one quarter] of the members of the committee of inquiry, by an institution or a body of the Union or by national authorities concerned. Witnesses and experts
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. After the inquiry has been closed, the final report of the committee of inquiry shall be submitted to the European Parliament, which
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. If it adopts the report, Parliament may decide to take appropriate action.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. The committee’s final report may include minority conclusions as an official part of the text, provided such conclusions are supported by at least one quarter of the committee’s members.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The President of the European Parliament may announce
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Those sanctions shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and shall reflect the sanctions for corresponding infringements in relation to the work of committees of inquiry in the national parliaments.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 1. Any natural or legal person other than institutions and bodies of the Union and the Member States may submit a reasoned written complaint against a decision of the committee of inquiry, taken in application of Section 3, which is addressed to that person or of direct and individual concern to him or her. The complaint shall specify the alleged violation of Union
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 3. The European Parliament shall take a reasoned decision on the complaint at the first part-session following the expiry of a period of [10 working days] from receipt of the complaint.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 a (new) Article 19a Costs The travel and accommodation expenses of members and officials of the Union institutions and bodies shall be borne by those institutions and bodies. Travel and accommodation expenses of other persons who appear before a committee of inquiry shall be reimbursed by the European Parliament in accordance with the rules governing hearings of experts.
source: PE-472.232
|
| 7 |
2010/0215(COD) Judicial cooperation in criminal matters: right to information in criminal proceedings
2011/01/13
LIBE
7 amendments...
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. For the purposes of this directive, the term ‘child’ shall mean any person under the age of 18.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that any person who is suspected or accused of having committed a criminal offence is provided promptly with information on his procedural rights in simple and accessible language, either orally or in writing.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall include as a minimum: – the right
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) In addition to the information to be given under Article 3(2), the person deprived of liberty shall be informed of the following: a) for how many hours/days he or she may be deprived of liberty before being brought before a judicial authority; b) how to challenge the arrest and how to secure a review of his or her detention; c) the maximum period he or she may legally be held in pre-trial detention.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that a suspected or accused person is provided with sufficient information about the charge to
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The information required pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be delivered
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The information
source: PE-454.671
|
| 2 |
2010/2291(ACI) European Parliament/European Commission Agreement: transparency register for organisations and self-employed individuals engaged in EU policy-making and policy implementation
2011/01/04
AFCO
2 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 6 – point b (b) the scope of the register, which covers all relevant actors but excludes, among others
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines that the representations and other bodies maintained by the actors listed in paragraphs 11, 12 and 13 must be given preferential treatment when implementing paragraphs 13 to 27 of the agreement, with particular regard to paragraph 17;
source: PE-462.714
|
| 7 |
2011/0136(COD) Orphan works: permitted uses
2011/10/28
JURI
7 amendments...
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works undertaken by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as by archives, film heritage institutions, publishers of the works listed in point 1 of paragraph 2 and public service broadcasting organizations.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. This Directive applies to
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 (3) Cinematographic, audio or audiovisual works produced by public service broadcasting organisations
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Where a work has more than one rightholder, and at least one of the rightholders has not been identified
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. A diligent search is required to be carried out only
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 If a work considered to be orphan has only one rightholder, Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. If, in the case of an orphan work, one or more rightholders has been identified but not located, the name(s) of the rightholder(s) shall be indicated every time a work is used.
source: PE-475.839
|
| 13 |
2011/0154(COD) Judicial cooperation in criminal matters: right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and right to communicate upon arrest
2011/11/17
JURI
13 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Title 1 Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Title 1 Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and on the right to communicate
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 a (new) Article 2a Definitions For the purpose of this Directive: (a) "child" means a person below the age of 18 years; (b) "lawyer" means a person who is entitled under national legislation to assist in all stages of criminal proceedings.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive applies
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 a (new) Article 2a Content of the right of access to a lawyer 1. The suspect or accused person shall have the right at all stages of the proceedings to request to meet with the lawyer representing him. 2. The lawyer shall have the right to be present at any questioning and hearing. He shall have the right to ask questions, request clarification and make statements, which shall be recorded in accordance with national law. 3. The lawyer shall have the right to be present at any other investigative or evidence-gathering act at which the suspect or accused person’s presence is required or permitted as a right, in accordance with national law, unless this would prejudice the acquisition of evidence. 4. The lawyer shall have the right to check the conditions in which the suspect or accused person is detained and to this end shall have access to the place where the person is detained. 5. The duration and frequency of meetings between the suspect or accused person and his lawyer shall not be limited in any way that may prejudice the exercise of his rights of defence.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 a (new) Article 6a Information 1. Member States shall ensure that suspects and accused persons are informed, without delay and in an understandable form, about their right of access to a lawyer and the fact that the right continues to apply at all subsequent stages of the proceedings even if they did not exercise it at an earlier stage. Without prejudice to national law that requires the mandatory presence or assistance of a lawyer, any waiver of the right to a lawyer referred to in this Directive shall be subject to the following conditions: a) the suspect or accused person has received prior legal advice on the consequences of the waiver or has otherwise obtained full knowledge of these consequences; b) he has the necessary capacity to understand these consequences; and c) the waiver is given voluntarily and unequivocally. 2. A record shall be kept, in accordance with the law of the Member State concerned, of the suspect’s or accused person’s having been informed about the right of access to a lawyer. The waiver and the circumstances in which it was given shall be recorded in accordance with the law of the Member State concerned. 3. Member States shall ensure that a waiver can be subsequently revoked at any stage of the proceedings.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall not derogate from any of the provisions of this Directive save, in exceptional circumstances, from Article 3, Article 4 paragraphs 1 to 3
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a a) shall be justified by
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [24 months after
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 This Directive shall enter into force
source: PE-475.965
|
| 3 |
2011/2182(INI) EU Citizenship Report 2010: dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens’ rights
2012/01/20
PETI
3 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Lisbon Treaty enhanced the concept of EU citizenship and the rights derived therefrom; whereas the formulation of those rights is also driven by case law;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. welcoming the case law of the European Court of Justice as regards the interpretation of Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which emphasises in the ERT ruling that the institutions of the Member States are also bound by the overriding fundamental rights of the Union if they wish to use national measures to restrict the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU);
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas
source: PE-480.601
|
| 1 |
2011/2257(REG) EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 196: provisions concerning plenary sittings applicable in committee
2012/02/29
AFCO
1 amendments...
Amendment 4 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 196 Rules 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 36 to 44, 148, 149(2) and (10), 152, 154, 156 to 159, 161, 163(1), 164
source: PE-483.731
|
| 19 |
2011/2317(INI) Annual Report of the activities of the Committee on Petitions 2011
2012/05/24
PETI
19 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A (new) A. whereas the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union has acquired legally binding force through the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the right of citizens to petition the European Parliament has already been enshrined in the Treaty since the entry into force of the Maastricht Treaty on 1 November 1993;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Committee on Petitions has the duty to constantly review and, where possible, to enhance its role, notably with regard to the development of democratic principles, and whereas in its regular activity the Committee works closely with the Commission acting as the ‘Guardian of the Treaty’
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. welcomes the case law of the European Court of Justice on the interpretation of Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which emphasises in respect of the Equal Rights Trust that the institutions of the Member States shall be bound by the overriding fundamental rights of the Union even if they wish to use national measures to restrict the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU);
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas European citizens and residents have legitimate expectations that the issues they raise with the Committee on Petitions may find a solution within the legal framework of the European Union, which they look upon to uphold their rights as citizens of the Union, in particular to defend their natural environment, health, freedom of movement, dignity and fundamental rights;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. considering that individuals and local communities, as well as voluntary associations and businesses, are well placed to assess the effectiveness of European legislation as it applies to them, and to signal possible loopholes that need to be analysed in order to ensure better, more uniform and comparable implementation of EU law in all the Member States;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas the judgment of the EU Tribunal of 14 September 2011 in case T- 308/07
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q a (new) Qa. whereas the efficiency of the Committee’s work is largely characterised by swiftness and thoroughness and could be further improved in particular by optimising the time taken to process petitions and by systematising the procedure for their assessment;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Confirms the key role of the Committee on Petitions in identifying non-judicial remedies for citizens,
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Believes, therefore, that this role and responsibility should lead Parliament to consider ways of revitalising this fundamental part of parliamentary work both in terms of its visibility and in terms of improving its ability to raise issues of importance to European citizens in plenary
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point a (new) (a) Calls on the Committee on Petitions to examine the effects of the Equal Rights Trust case law on the reliability of petitions and to investigate the question of what actual obstacles exist for citizens of the Union in obtaining a reliable interpretation of central issues under European legislation in cases before the national courts by applying for a preliminary ruling from the European Court of Justice;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Spanish Government to revise the Ley de Costas in such a way as to guarantee title to those who have properly and in good faith acquired property within the reach of the jurisdiction of the Ley de Costas; in particular, calls for a reform of the Ley de Costas which ensures due process
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – point a (new) (a) Is determined to make the petition procedure more efficient, transparent, and impartial, while preserving the participatory rights of the Members of the Committee on Petitions, so that the handling of petitions will stand up to judicial review even at a procedural level;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – point b (new) (b) Emphasises the need for continuity in processing petitions, despite changes in legislative periods and the resulting changes in personnel;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – point c (new) (c) Regards the participation of Members of Parliament in fact-finding missions not just as a participatory parliamentary right, but also as an obligation in relation to petitioners;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – point d (new) (d) As part of the efforts to improve the work of the Committee, calls for a procedure involving fact-finding missions that on the one hand ensures the right of all members of a fact-finding mission to present the facts from their point of view, while also guaranteeing all Committee Members the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process in regard to the conclusions to be drawn by the Committee on Petitions;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – point e (new) (e) Emphasises that the Committee on Petitions, along with other institutions and bodies, such as the committees of inquiry, the European Citizens’ Initiative and the European Ombudsman, play an independent and clearly defined role as points of contact for each individual citizen;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – point f (new) (f) Calls on the Conference of Presidents to examine the extent to which an amendment to the Rules of Procedure would seem appropriate for the implementation of these formal requirements in relation to the petitioning procedure;
source: PE-489.586
|
| 57 |
2012/0237(COD) European political parties and European political foundations: statute and funding
2013/01/18
AFCO
57 amendments...
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) ‘political alliance’ means structured cooperation between political parties
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) 3 a) ‘member party’ means a political party or political alliance belonging to a European political party.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new) 3 b) ‘individual members’ means natural persons belonging directly to a European political party, where the statutes of the party permit this.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (5) ‘regional Parliament’ or ‘regional assembly’ means a body
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) it must not pursue profit goals.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d (d)
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) In determining the number referred to in subparagraph (b) only member parties which meet the criteria under Article 4 shall be taken into account.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point j Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the admission, resignation and exclusion of
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the rights and duties associated with all types of membership, including the rules guaranteeing the representation rights of all members,
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) the functioning of a general assembly,
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) the
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) the arrangements for the appointment of members of all other governing bodies in a secret ballot for a period not exceeding two years, and for their re-election and removal;
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) the
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point g Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new) (g a) the procedure for dissolution of the entity as a recognised European political party, including the necessary implementing methods.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – point g (g)
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – point g a (new) (ga) the rules on the appointment of members of the foundation’s bodies by secret ballot, their re-election and their dismissal;
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – point g b (new) (gb) the other internal rules of the European political foundation on taking decisions, elections, quorums required and amendment of their statutes;
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – point j Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 5. Within three months following the reception of the application for registration, the European Parliament, acting in accordance with its Rules of Procedure, shall adopt a decision, which it shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Union, together with the party or foundation statutes or, where an application has not been approved, the grounds for rejection.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In all other cases governed by Articles 3, 4 and 5, the Administration of the European Parliament shall verify annually that the formal requirements and conditions continue to be met by the European political parties and European political foundations. Before any decision is taken, the European political party shall be given the opportunity to be heard. The decision may be reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union upon application by the European political party. Where relevant, the timing of the annual verification referred to in this paragraph shall be aligned with the application procedure for funding set out in Article 13, in order for the Registry and the Authorising Officer to coordinate and exchange information as necessary.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) its
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) its
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) it is removed from the Registry
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. A
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. A European political party registered in accordance with the conditions and procedures laid down in this Regulation
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1 Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1a (new) – 10% shall be distributed in proportion to the number of votes cast for them as a percentage of the total votes cast in the most recent European elections for European political parties which reached the threshold of at least 1% of the votes cast.
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1b (new) – 10% shall be distributed equally among the European parties concerned which are represented by at least one Member in the European Parliament.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1c (new) – 80% shall be distributed in proportion to their share of elected members of the European Parliament among the beneficiary European political parties.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – indent 2 Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 After this date, any changes to the number shall not affect the respective share of funding between European political parties or European political foundations
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) For the purpose of allocating the appropriations, a Member of the European Parliament may be designated as belonging to only one European political party, which shall, where relevant, be the party to which his national or regional party is affiliated on the final date for the submission of applications.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The same distribution key shall be used to award funding to European political foundations, on the basis of their affiliation with a European political party.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 7 7. Contributions to a European political party from its members shall be admissible.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The funding of European political parties from the general budget of the European Union or from any other source may be used to finance campaigns conducted by the European political parties in the context of the elections to the European Parliament
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 2. The funding of European political foundations from the general budget of the European Union or from any other source shall not be used for any other purpose than for financing their tasks as defined in Article 2 point (4) and to meet expenditure directly linked to the objectives set out in their statutes according to Article 5. It shall in particular not be used for the direct or indirect funding of European, national, regional or local elections or referendums, political parties, candidates or foundations.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph -1 (new) -1. Where, under the terms of this regulation, funds are withdrawn from European political parties in accordance with the Financial Regulation or fines imposed, the amounts in question shall, in accordance with Article 14, be entered additionally under appropriations for the current year.
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1a (new) All technical support from the European Parliament to European political parties shall be based on the principle of equal treatment. It shall be granted on conditions no less favourable than those granted to other external organisations and associations that may be accorded similar facilities and shall be supplied against invoice and payment.
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1b (new) The European Parliament shall adopt implementing provisions laying down the conditions under which political groups may, together with the European political parties which they represent in the European Parliament, organise events which could be regarded as indirect support, particularly if they are held on European Parliament premises.
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 c (new) In accordance with Article 24, the European Parliament shall publish details of the technical support provided to each European political party in an annual report, within three months following the end of the financial year.
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 3. When setting the amount of a fine imposed on a European political party or a European political foundation pursuant to paragraph 2, the European Parliament shall take into account the gravity, duration and, where relevant, recurrence of the infringement, the time that has elapsed, the intention or degree of negligence, and any measures taken to comply with the conditions and requirements of this Regulation, while ensuring that the amount of the fine is at least twice the value of the advantage obtained. Any fine must be effective and dissuasive, and may not exceed 10% of the annual budget of the European political party or the European political foundation in question corresponding to the year in which the sanction is imposed. Under certain circumstances, the fine may be paid in appropriate instalments.
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 1. Before
source: PE-504.068
|
| 1 |
2012/2020(REG) EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 15(2): order of precedence of Vice-Presidents elected by acclamation
2012/11/15
AFCO
1 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Rule 15 – paragraph 1 The Vice-Presidents shall then be elected on a single ballot paper. To be valid, the ballot paper must show that more than half the available votes have been used. Those who on the first ballot, up to the number of 14, secure an absolute majority of the votes cast shall be declared elected in order of the number of votes obtained. If the number of candidates elected is less than the number of seats to be filled, a second ballot shall be held under the same conditions to fill the remaining seats. Should a third ballot be necessary, a relative majority shall suffice for election to the remaining seats. In the event of a tie the oldest candidates shall be declared elected.
source: PE-498.144
|
| 4 |
2012/2132(INI) Implementation of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive
2013/04/01
JURI
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reminds the Commission of its commitment to the smart regulation agenda, and the importance of making timely and pertinent ex-post controls of EU legislation in order to manage the quality of regulation throughout the policy cycle; notes in this respect that, under Article 33 of the Directive, the Commission was under an obligation to submit the report on the application of the Directive no later than 19 December 2011; notes that the report was not submitted until 4 May 2012; encourages the Commission to assure proper and timely implementation of directives in the Member States
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has finally presented a proposal for a directive on collective management of copyright; calls on the Commission and the Council to work together with Parliament to find a balanced solution regarding the rules applicable to collecting societies in the audiovisual sector, paying due attention to a high level of transparency, good governance and the question of music embedded in films and other audiovisual works; in this regard, calls on the Commission to ensure
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission, in its next report on the application of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, to assess whether the Member States have implemented the Directive in such a way as to pr
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the personal commitment made by Commissioner Barnier in relation to the ongoing negotiations on a Treaty on copyright limitations and exceptions for visually impaired persons and persons with print disabilities; calls on the Commission to ensure that aids for persons with impaired vision are
source: PE-502.190
|
| 4 |
2012/2309(INI) Composition of the European Parliament with a view to the 2014 elections
2013/01/02
AFCO
4 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Undertakes to submit
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Undertakes to submit
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a Decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament Article 4 This Decision shall be revised by the end of 2015 with the aim of establishing sufficiently far in advance of the beginning of the 2019- 2024 parliamentary term
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament Article 4 This Decision shall be revised before the end of 2015 with the aim of establishing, sufficiently far in advance of the beginning of the 2019-2024 parliamentary term
source: PE-504.228
|
Rainer WIELAND on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
Term 6 20.07.2004 - 13.07.2009
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |


