Martin EHRENHAUSER
Constituencies
-
Austria
Liste "Dr. Martin - für Demokratie, Kontrolle, Gerechtigkeit"
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Groups
-
NA
Member
Non-attached Members
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Budgetary Control | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Subcommittee on Security and Defence | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Iran | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean | 2009/09/16 | 2012/02/14 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries | 2009/09/16 | 2012/02/12 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://www.ehrenhauser.at
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45766
- Fax
- +322 28 49766
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 06F266
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75766
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79766
- Office
- Bât. Winston Churchill M04004
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Europäisches Parlament
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 06F266
- B-1047 Brüssel
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2013/2015(DEC) | Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2011 Commission discharge |
| Shadow | 2012/2291(INI) | Integrated internal control framework |
| Shadow | 2012/2221(DEC) | 2011 discharge: ENIAC Joint Undertaking |
| Shadow | 2012/2220(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH Joint Undertaking) |
| Shadow | 2012/2219(DEC) | 2011 discharge: IMI Joint Undertaking for the implementation of the Joint Technology Initiative on Innovative Medicines |
| Shadow | 2012/2218(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Artemis Joint Undertaking to implement a Joint Technology Initiative in Embedded Computing Systems |
| Shadow | 2012/2217(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Clean Sky Joint Undertaking |
| Shadow | 2012/2216(DEC) | 2011 discharge: SESAR Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system |
| Shadow | 2012/2215(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Fusion for Energy) |
| Shadow | 2012/2214(DEC) | 2011 discharge: performance, financial management and control of EU agencies |
| Shadow | 2012/2212(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) |
| Shadow | 2012/2211(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) |
| Shadow | 2012/2210(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) |
| Shadow | 2012/2209(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2208(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2207(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Banking Authority (EBA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2206(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) |
| Shadow | 2012/2205(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Police Office (EUROPOL) |
| Shadow | 2012/2204(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2203(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2202(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFSA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2201(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European GNSS Agency (GSA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2200(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (FRONTEX) |
| Shadow | 2012/2199(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Police College (CEPOL) |
| Shadow | 2012/2198(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Railway Agency (ERA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2197(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2196(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2195(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
| Shadow | 2012/2194(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2193(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2192(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Training Foundation (ETF) |
| Shadow | 2012/2191(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (EUROJUST) |
| Shadow | 2012/2190(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Medicines Agency (EMA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2189(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) |
| Shadow | 2012/2188(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2187(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Environment Agency (EEA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2186(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2185(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2184(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND) |
| Shadow | 2012/2183(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) |
| Shadow | 2012/2177(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Council |
| Shadow | 2012/2176(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European External Action Service |
| Shadow | 2012/2175(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor |
| Shadow | 2012/2174(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Ombudsman |
| Shadow | 2012/2173(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Committee of the Regions |
| Shadow | 2012/2172(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Economic and Social Committee |
| Shadow | 2012/2171(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Auditors |
| Shadow | 2012/2170(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Justice |
| Shadow | 2012/2169(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Council |
| Shadow | 2012/2168(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Parliament |
| Shadow | 2012/2167(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission |
| Shadow | 2012/2166(DEC) | 2011 discharge: 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDF) |
| Shadow | 2012/2064(INI) | Future role of the Court of Auditors. Procedure for the nomination of Members of the Court of Auditors: consultation of the European Parliament |
| Shadow | 2012/2060(DEC) | Special report 2/2012 (2011 discharge): Financial instruments for SMEs co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund |
| Shadow | 2012/2059(DEC) | Special report 1/2012 (2011 discharge): Effectiveness of European Union development aid for food security in sub-Saharan Africa |
| Shadow | 2012/2017(DEC) | Special report 16/2011 (2011 discharge): EU financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: achievements and future challenges |
| Shadow | 2012/2015(DEC) | Special report 14/2011 (2011 discharge): Has EU assistance improved Croatia’s capacity to manage post-accession funding? |
| Shadow | 2012/2010(DEC) | Special report 13/2011 (2011 discharge): Does the control of customs procedure 42 prevent and detect VAT evasion? |
| Shadow | 2012/2009(DEC) | Special report 12/2011 (2011 discharge): Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? |
| Shadow | 2012/0805(NLE) | Court of Auditors: appointment of a member, Leonard Orban - RO |
| Shadow | 2012/0193(COD) | Fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law |
| Shadow | 2011/2287(INI) | Towards more efficient and cost effective interpreting in the European Parliament |
| Shadow | 2011/2265(DEC) | 2010 discharge: ENIAC Joint Undertaking |
| Shadow | 2011/2264(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) |
| Shadow | 2011/2255(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Police Office (EUROPOL) |
| Shadow | 2011/2242(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Joint Undertaking |
| Shadow | 2011/2241(DEC) | 2010 discharge: IMI Joint Undertaking for the implementation of the Joint Technology Initiative on Innovative Medicines |
| Shadow | 2011/2240(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Artemis Joint Undertaking to implement a Joint Technology Initiative in Embedded Computing Systems |
| Shadow | 2011/2239(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Clean Sky Joint Undertaking |
| Shadow | 2011/2238(DEC) | 2010 discharge: SESAR Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system |
| Shadow | 2011/2237(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy |
| Shadow | 2011/2236(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2235(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2234(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Community Fisheries Control Agency (CFCA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2233(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European GNSS Agency (GSA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2231(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (FRONTEX) |
| Shadow | 2011/2230(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Police College (CEPOL) |
| Shadow | 2011/2229(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Railway Agency (ERA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2228(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2227(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
| Shadow | 2011/2226(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2224(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2223(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2222(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Training Foundation (ETF) |
| Shadow | 2011/2221(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (EUROJUST) |
| Shadow | 2011/2220(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Medicines Agency (EMA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2219(DEC) | 2010 discharge: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) |
| Shadow | 2011/2218(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2217(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Environment Agency (EEA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2216(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2215(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) |
| Shadow | 2011/2214(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND) |
| Shadow | 2011/2213(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) |
| Responsible | 2011/2212(DEC) | 2010 discharge: 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDF) |
| Shadow | 2011/2209(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor |
| Shadow | 2011/2208(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, European Ombudsman |
| Shadow | 2011/2207(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Committee of the Regions |
| Shadow | 2011/2206(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Economic and Social Committee |
| Shadow | 2011/2205(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Auditors |
| Shadow | 2011/2204(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Justice |
| Shadow | 2011/2202(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section I - European Parliament |
| Shadow | 2011/2201(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission |
| Responsible | 2011/2073(INI) | Budgetary control of EU humanitarian aid managed by ECHO |
| Shadow | 2011/0454(COD) | Protection of the European Union's financial interests: Hercule III programme, 2014-2020 |
| Shadow | 2006/0084(COD) | Fight against fraud: investigations by the European Anti-Fraud Offfice (OLAF) |
Born
1978/09/18 Linz- Studied cookery in Linz, Austria (1993-1996). Studied business management at the University of Linz (MBA) (2001-2005). Studied politics at the Universities of Innsbruck and Loughborough, England (Mag. phil.) (2003-2007).
- Practical experience as a chef in Austria, Malaysia and the USA (1996-2001). Trainee with Austrian Tourist Information Centre in Berlin (2003); trainee with the Austria Centre in Beirut (2005). Head of the office of an Austrian Member of the European Parliament (2007-2009).
- Federal representative of the Austrian Students' Union (2005-2007).
- Collaborated on the book 'Die Europafalle', Piper Verlag.
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 15 |
2009/2069(DEC) 2008 discharge: EU general budget, European Parliament
2010/03/03
CONT
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes the general concept of '
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Views the prevention and investigation of corruption as a fundamental precondition of 'good governance';
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Draws
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that key elements of a good
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that Parliament is a complex organisation in which the boundary between political and administrative decisions and responsibilities is not always clear due to the multilayered character of the institution's governance structure and the fact that high-
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Invites the competent services, therefore, to review and reinforce the minimum internal control standards in order to include lessons learned and to keep in line with developments in risk management and
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Emphasises the decisive importance to Parliament's credibility of ensuring that the EU rules on public procurement, agreed with significant input from Parliament, are properly and rigorously applied;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 b (new) 28b. Welcomes and supports the European Ombudsman's efforts to ensure that the rules on the award of public contracts are properly applied and that errors and infringements are investigated and corrected, because only in this way can transparency and fairness be guaranteed;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 c (new) Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 d (new) 28d. Points to Special Report No 2/2007 of the Court of Auditors, in which the Court reviewed the procedure for the Willy Brandt and Jószef Antall buildings and found that in place of the competitive tendering normally envisaged by the Financial Regulation and the directives on public procurement, the method of 'negotiated procedure' (without advertising) had been used, which meant that the prices paid 'have not been determined under conditions of open competition' (Report, paragraph 23, Official Journal C 148 of 2.7.2007, page 1);
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 e (new) 28e. Points to the fundamental significance of the European Court of Justice's judgment of 29 October 2009 in case C-536/07; welcomes the fact that this judgment enables the City of Cologne to renegotiate a contract with a private undertaking for the lease of exhibition halls, since the original contract breached Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts1;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 f (new) 28f. In the light of the C-536/07 judgment and on the basis of Article 103 of the Financial Regulation, calls on the Praesidium of Parliament to investigate whether sums already paid to private contractors for the Willy Brandt and Jószef Antall buildings might not be recovered if tendering rules have been infringed;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 68 a (new) 68a. Calls on the Secretary-General, the Director-General for Personnel and the Director-General for Innovation and Technological Support to look at how far use might be made of new video- conferencing technologies as a way of reducing the cost of missions; points especially to the use of Open Source software as a secure and cheap way of conducting video conferences;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 68 b (new) 68b. Calls on the Secretary-General and the Director-General for Personnel to end the system of flat-rate reimbursement of mission expenses and replace it with a system whereby only costs actually incurred are reimbursed; points in this context to the need to encourage staff to choose less expensive travel and accommodation options, perhaps by publishing individuals' mission expenses on Parliament's website so that they are fully transparent;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 75 75. Recalls – as stated in paragraph 104 of its resolution of 23 April 2009 accompanying the discharge decision in respect to the financial year 2007 – that the Members' additional voluntary pension scheme (the fund) originally should have been established as a self-governing entity outside the structure of Parliament
source: PE-439.268
|
| 2 |
2009/2070(DEC) 2008 discharge: EU general budget, Council
2010/03/03
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
source: PE-439.262
|
| 24 |
2009/2198(INI) Implementation of the European Security Strategy and the Common Security and Defence Policy
2010/01/28
AFET
24 amendments...
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Reiterates its support for the Union’s efforts to address these threats by de
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – point e Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Council in 2010, in the debate with the European Parliament and national parliaments on the implementation of the new clause in the Lisbon Treaty concerning mutual assistance in the event of armed aggression on the territory of a Member State, to take account of the fact that this collective assistance obligation possesses no legally binding force, does not necessarily entail the use of military means and leaves it to the discretion of the individual Member States to decide the nature of the assistance to be provided, thus also permitting the militarily neutral and non-aligned Member States to preserve the special character of their security and defence policies;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Council to reopen the debate on establishing a European civil protection force – inter alia on the basis of the May 2006 Barnier report – that would pool the Member States’ resources in order to generate an effective collective response in the event of natural or man-made disasters,
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses, in the light of
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Stresses that the European Union’s naval operation in Somalia (EU NAVFOR Somalia – Operation Atalanta) to combat piracy in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia is not an adequate means of eliminating the causes of the piracy there; notes that, contrary to the statement by the Swedish Presidency of the Council that attacks in the Gulf of Aden have declined significantly, the International Maritime Bureau has indicated that 306 attacks took place in the first nine months of 2009 alone, whereas in 2008 only 293 had been recorded in the whole year; stresses furthermore that, according to the International Maritime Bureau, armed attacks have risen by 200% since the operation began; stresses in addition that the expenditure incurred by this operation and by other national and multilateral operations is out of all reasonable proportion to the estimated losses;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Welcomes
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 a (new) 40a. Observes that continued stationing of nuclear weapons within the European Union undermines worldwide efforts to prevent third countries from developing nuclear weapons;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42. Stresses th
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 a (new) 42a. Stresses that increasing arms expenditure is not compatible either with the objective of peace-keeping or with the budgetary priorities of the European Union, which is a peace project; calls on the Member States and the Council to take measures with the aim of saving on arms expenditure by means of a division of labour and resources, particularly as an alternative to new defence procurement;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48.
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Supports the establishment of a
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 58 58. Recalls the provision in the Lisbon Treaty on the start-up fund available to the Vice-President/High Representative for the purpose of financing preparatory activities for CSDP missions which
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 67 67.
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 74 74.
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 76 76. Calls on the Council to i
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 77. Calls for the revision of the 2002 interinstitutional agreements between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the European Parliament’s access to sensitive Council information relating to the ESDP and the CSDP, so that
source: PE-431.187
|
| 16 |
2010/0074(COD) Citizens' initiative
2010/11/16
AFCO
16 amendments...
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) It is necessary to establish the minimum number of Member States from which citizens must come.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In order to ensure coherence and transparency in relation to proposed citizens' initiatives and to avoid a situation in which signatures are collected for a proposal which does not fall within the scope of this Regulation, it should be mandatory to register such initiatives on a website made available by the Commission prior to collecting the necessary statements of support from citizens
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The Commission should examine a citizens' initiative and set out its
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 1 1. "Citizens’ initiative" means an initiative, submitted to the Commission in accordance with the present Regulation, inviting the Commission, within the framework of its powers, to submit any appropriate proposal on matters where citizens consider that a legal act of the Union is required for the purpose of implementing the Treaties, which has received the support of at least one million eligible signatories coming from at least one
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Organisers shall form a citizens' committee of at least five persons who are residents of at least five Member States. The organisers shall designate one representative and one substitute, who shall perform a liaison function between the citizens' committee and the institutions of the European Union throughout the procedure and who shall be mandated to speak and act on behalf of the citizens' committee.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Requirement applicable to the Commission The Commission shall draw up a clear list of admissibility criteria, indicating the rules relating to the collection of signatures (on paper and on line) and all the formal criteria for completing the form for a statement of support. The list of eligibility criteria should also make it clear to European citizens on what subjects no citizens’ initiatives may be launched and on what specific grounds an application may be rejected.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Prior to initiating the collection of statements of support from signatories for a proposed citizens' initiative, the organisers shall be required to register it with the Commission, providing the information set out in Annex II, in particular on the subject-matter and objectives
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 This information shall be provided in one o
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall refuse to register a proposed initiative if the conditions laid down in paragraph 3 are not met. The Commission shall take any measures it considers necessary to assure organisers that its decision on the registration fully respects the letter and the spirit of the Treaties, without prejudice to its subsequent decision on the substance of the matter. Should the Commission refuse to register an initiative, it shall inform the organisers of the reasons for this refusal and ensure that EU citizens have quick and easy access (Internet) to a statement of those reasons and to details of all the legal and non-legal forms of redress available to them.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The signatories of a citizens' initiative shall come from at least one
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. In one
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 After having obtained the certificates provided for in Article 9(2), and provided that all relevant procedures and conditions set out in this Regulation have been complied with, the organisers may submit the citizens’ initiative to the Commission, accompanied by information regarding any support and funding received for the initiative. The amount of support and funding received from natural persons needed to trigger the requirement to provide information shall be determined by the Commission by means of delegated acts, pursuant to Article 16, and in accordance with the conditions laid down in Articles 17 and 18. The Commission shall be required to provide an adequate explanation for any decision to set different thresholds for different citizens' initiatives.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new) The costs incurred by the organiser in complying with the admissibility criteria, including testing by independent auditors, and legal costs incurred in successfully challenging a decision to reject a citizens' initiative shall be reimbursed up to a maximum of EUR 50 000.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new) The remit of and funding for the existing help centres in the Member States should be strengthened in such a way that members of the public and non- governmental organisations can obtain free of charge expert advice on the legal issues relating to European citizens' initiatives.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b b. examine the citizens' initiative and, within
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I Minimum number of signatories per Member State Austria
source: PE-452.836
|
| 11 |
2010/2007(INI) 2008 discharge: performance, financial management and control of agencies
2010/03/03
CONT
11 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Takes the view that the absence of a rigorous strategy for reaching decisions on the seats of agencies has given rise to unnecessary additional costs and that this has led to the true costs being kept from taxpayers since, for example, previously non-existent infrastructure was not taken into account, leading to additional costs, inter alia for construction of new offices and conference venues, new schools, development of transport infrastructure because of higher mission costs, considerable difficulties in recruiting staff, etc.;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 a (new) -1a. Calls on the interinstitutional working party on the agencies to draw up a precise catalogue of criteria which must be used in reaching decisions on seats, in order to achieve goals such as greater responsibility, transparency and efficiency in European administration;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) (in section "Purpose of agencies") 1a. Is concerned that the Commission has only on rare occasions adequately fulfilled the requirement to give reasons in the context of the subsidiarity principle; calls on the Commission to meet the requirement to provide reasons in the context of the subsidiarity principle with the help of detailed qualitative and quantitative criteria;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) (in section "Purpose of agencies") 1b. Notes that many agencies are active in areas which do not fall within the exclusive competence of the Union; notes that the subsidiarity principle has often been violated as a result;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 c (new) (in section "Purpose of agencies") 1c. Calls on the interinstitutional working party on the agencies to look carefully at which agencies have areas of activity that do not fall within the exclusive competence of the Union, and on the basis of this to draw up a detailed timetable for closing these agencies;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes that some of the agencies have very similar remits; calls accordingly for the interinstitutional working group on the agencies to
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the interinstitutional working party on the agencies to set an upper limit on the number of members of the management board, using the number of posts provided for in the establishment plan of the agency in question as a guide;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. having regard to the principle of conferral, which is enshrined in the current legal base of the European Union in, inter alia, Article 5(2) of the Treaty on European Union (formerly Article 5 of the EC Treaty) and states that the Union shall act only within the limits of the competences conferred upon it by the Member States in the Treaties to attain the objectives set out therein, and that competences not conferred upon the Union in the Treaties remain with the Member States,
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. having regard to the principle of subsidiarity, which is enshrined in the current legal base of the European Union in, inter alia, Article 5(3) of the Treaty on European Union (formerly Article 5(2) of the EC Treaty) and states that in areas which do not fall within its exclusive competence, the Union shall act only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, either at central level or at regional and local level, but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level,
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new) Cc. whereas, under Article 5 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, draft European legislative acts must be justified with regard to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, and the reasons for concluding that a Union objective can be better achieved at Union level must be substantiated by qualitative or quantitative indicators,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C d (new) Cd. whereas, under Article 5 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, proper account must be taken of the need for any burden, whether financial or administrative, falling upon the Union to be minimised and commensurate with the objective to be achieved,
source: PE-439.260
|
| 72 |
2011/0023(COD) Fight against terrorism and serious crime: use of passenger name record (PNR) data
2012/03/04
LIBE
22 amendments...
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) PNR data
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) PNR data can help law enforcement authorities prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute serious transnational crimes, including acts of terrorism, by comparing them with various databases of persons and objects sought, to
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) To prevent, detect, investigate and prosecute terrorist offences and serious
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Air carriers already collect and process PNR data from their passengers for their own commercial purposes. This Directive should not impose any obligation on air carriers to collect or retain any additional data from passengers or to impose any obligation on passengers to provide any data in addition to that already being provided to air carriers. Where air carriers do not routinely capture data in the normal course of business for commercial purposes, they should not be required to develop processes to collect such data.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) (11a) Member States should bear the costs of processing and forwarding PNR data.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) The definition of terrorist offences should be taken from Article
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) The contents of
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) There are two possible methods of data transfer currently available: the
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Member States should share with other Member States the PNR data that they receive where such transfer is necessary for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) The period during which PNR data are to be retained should be proportionate to the purposes of the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious transnational crime. Because of the nature of the data and their uses, it is necessary that the PNR data are retained for a sufficiently long period for carrying out analysis and for use in investigations. In order to avoid disproportionate use, it is necessary that, after an initial period, the data are fully anonymised
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) The processing of PNR data domestically in each Member State by the Passenger Information Unit and by competent authorities should be subject to a standard of protection of personal data under their national law which is in line with Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) Taking into consideration the right to the protection of personal data, the rights of the data subjects to processing of their PNR data, such as the right of access, the right of rectification, erasure and blocking, as well as the rights to compensation and judicial remedies, should be in line with Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA and Directive 95/46/EC.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 a (new) (25a) Member States should ensure that the costs arising from measures taken to use PNR data are not passed on to passengers.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 (26) Transfers of PNR data by Member States to third countries should be permitted only on a case-by-case basis and in compliance with Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 a (new) (26a) The transmission of PNR data should be limited to cases where it is indispensable for the prevention and detection of specific terrorist offences and, where third countries are involved, only if in compliance with Union data protection legislation.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) In particular, the scope of the Directive is as limited as possible, it allows retention of PNR data for period of time not exceeding
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) The prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The PNR data collected in accordance with this Directive shall not be processed for offences which are punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of less than three years under the national law of a Member State.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. This Directive does not apply to flights within Europe or to means of transport other than airplanes.
source: PE-486.017
2012/03/28
LIBE
50 amendments...
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f (f)
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i – introductory part (i)
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (ia) 'anonymisation' in the sense of the Directive can be defined as the irreversible manipulation of personal data, as defined in Directive 1995/46/EC, whether by the data controller or by any other person such that the data may not be associated with one or a small group of data subjects, taking account of all the means reasonably likely to be used either by the controller or by any other person to identify that person; in particular by reference to an identification number, location data, online identifier or to one or more factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity of that person.
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall set up or designate an authority competent for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences and serious transnational crime or a branch of such an authority to act as its
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 a (new) Article 3a The storage, treatment and analysis of PNR data relating to passengers on international flights shall be carried out exclusively within the territory of the EU. The legislation applicable to these procedures shall therefore be the Union legislation on personal data protection.
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The PNR data transferred by the air carriers, pursuant to Article 6, in relation to international flights which land on or depart from the territory of each Member State shall be collected by the Passenger Information Unit of the relevant Member State. Air carriers shall refrain from transmitting sensitive data. Should the PNR data transferred by air carriers include data beyond those listed in the Annex, the Passenger Information Unit shall delete such data immediately upon receipt.
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Member States shall bear the costs of collecting, processing and forwarding PNR data.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) responding, on a case-by-case basis, to duly reasoned requests from competent authorities to provide PNR data and process PNR data in specific cases for the purpose of prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime, and to provide the competent authorities with the results of such processing; and
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The transmission of PNR data shall be authorised only by order of a court of a Member State following an application by the Passenger Information Unit. Only where the Passenger Information Unit identifies danger in delay ('periculum in mora') may it authorise such processing itself.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall adopt a list of the competent authorities entitled to request or receive PNR data or the result of the processing of PNR data from the Passenger Information Units in order to examine that information further or take appropriate action for the purpose of preventing, detecting, investigating and prosecuting terrorist offences and serious transnational crime.
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. Competent authorities shall consist of authorities competent for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences and serious transnational crime.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 4 4. The PNR data of passengers and the result of the processing of PNR data received by the Passenger Information Unit may be further processed by the competent authorities of the Member States only for the purpose of preventing, detecting, investigating or prosecuting terrorist offences or serious transnational crime.
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to ensure that air carriers which already collect PNR data from their passengers transfer (
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Member States shall not require air carriers to collect any PNR data that they do not already collect. Air carriers shall not transfer any PNR data other than those defined in Article 2(c) and specified in the Annex. Air carriers shall take every reasonable precaution to ensure that the data collected from passengers are accurate and correct; where this is found not to be the case, the air carrier may be held liable.
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Air carriers shall transfer PNR data by electronic means using the common protocols and supported data formats to be adopted in accordance with the procedure of Articles 13 and 14 or, in the event of technical failure of the air carriers, by any other appropriate means ensuring an appropriate level of data security:
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. On a case-by-case basis, upon request from a Passenger Information Unit in accordance with national law, air carriers shall transfer PNR data where access earlier than that mentioned in point (a) of paragraph 2 is necessary to assist in responding to a specific and actual threat related to terrorist offences or serious transnational crime.
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that, with regard to persons identified by a Passenger Information Unit in accordance with Article 4(2)
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. The Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request, if necessary, the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter's database in accordance with Article 9(1), and, if necessary, also the result of the processing of PNR data. The request for such data shall be strictly limited to the data necessary in the specific case. It may be based on any one or a combination of data elements, as deemed necessary by the requesting Passenger Information Unit for a specific case of prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. The Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request, if necessary, the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter's database in accordance with Article 9(2), and, if necessary, also the result of the processing of PNR data. The Passenger Information Unit may request access to specific PNR data kept by the Passenger Information Unit of another Member State in their full form without the masking out only in exceptional circumstances in response to a specific threat or a specific investigation or prosecution related to terrorist offences or serious
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. Only in those cases where it is necessary for the prevention of an immediate and serious threat to public security may the competent authorities of a Member State request directly the Passenger Information Unit of any other Member State to provide it with PNR data that are kept in the latter's database in accordance with Article 9(1) and (2). Such requests shall relate to a specific investigation or prosecution of terrorist offences or serious transnational crime and shall be reasoned. Passenger Information Units shall respond to such requests as a matter of priority. In all other cases the competent authorities shall channel their requests through the Passenger Information Unit of their own Member State.
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 5 5. Exceptionally, where early access is necessary to respond to a specific and actual threat related to terrorist offences or serious transnational crime, the Passenger Information Unit of a Member State shall have the right to request the Passenger Information Unit of another Member State to provide it with PNR data of flights landing in or departing from the latter's territory at any time. Such requests shall be strictly limited to the data necessary in the specific case for the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime and shall be justified in writing.
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 6 6. Exchange of information under this Article may take place using any existing channels for European and international law enforcement cooperation, in particular Europol and national units under Article 8 of Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009. The language used for the request and the exchange of information shall be the one applicable to the channel used. Member States shall, when making their notifications in accordance with Article 3(3), also inform the Commission with details of the contacts to which requests may be sent in cases of urgency. The Commission shall communicate to the Member States the notifications received.
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part A Member State may transfer PNR data and the results of the processing of PNR data to a third country, only on a case-by- case basis and only when expressly authorized by a binding international agreement between the Union and that third country, and if:
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the third country
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) the third country allows Union citizens, without excessive delay or expense, the same level of protection of personal data and the same rights of access, rectification, erasure and compensation with regard to the PNR data as apply in the Union,
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. The result of matching referred to in Article 4(2)
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where provisions adopted under national law in implementation of Directive 95/46/EC provide the passenger with more rights to access, rectification, erasure and blocking of the data, to compensation, judicial redress, confidentiality of processing and data security than the provisions referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, those provisions shall apply.
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. State of the art technology shall be used for the protection of all data, taking into account the latest developments in expert discussions on data protection and constantly updated to include new knowledge and insights. In particular, a state of the art encryption process shall be used which: - ensures that data-processing systems cannot be used by unauthorised persons; - ensures that authorised users of a data- processing system can access no data other than those to which their access right refers, and that personal data cannot be read, copied, altered or removed without authorisation when being processed or used; - ensures that personal data cannot be read, copied or altered without authorisation when being electronically transmitted or during transport or saving to a storage medium, and ensures that it is possible to check and establish to which locations personal data is to be transferred by data transmission facilities. The possibility of retrospectively checking and establishing whether and by whom personal data have accessed shall be guaranteed. It shall be guaranteed that personal data processed under contract can be processed only in accordance with the contracting entity's instructions.
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall submit a report on the financial impact of this Directive to the European Parliament and the Council. The report shall focus in particular on the costs incurred by passengers, air carriers and ticket sellers. If appropriate, the report shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal aimed at harmonising the division of the financial burden between public authorities and air carriers across the Union.
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall prepare a set of statistical information on PNR data provided to the Passenger Information Units. Such statistics shall as a minimum cover the number of identifications of any persons who may be involved in a terrorist offence or serious transnational crime according to Article 4(2)
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a directive Annex 1 – point 5 Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a directive Annex 1 – point 6 Amendment 468 #
Proposal for a directive Annex 1 – point 11 Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a directive Annex 1 – point 12 Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a directive Annex 1 – point 13 Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a directive Annex 1 – point 14 Amendment 485 #
Proposal for a directive Annex 1 – point 17 Amendment 488 #
Proposal for a directive Annex 1 – point 19 source: PE-486.159
|
| 16 |
2011/0455(COD) Staff Regulations of European Union officials: amendment of the Regulations
2012/03/20
JURI
10 amendments...
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 5 a (new) Staff Regulations Article 11 a – paragraph 1 5a. Article 11a(1) shall be replaced by the following: '1. An official shall not, in the performance of his duties and save as hereinafter provided, deal with a matter in which, directly or indirectly, he has any personal interest such as to impair his independence, and, in particular, family and financial interests, or any other conflict of interest relating inter alia to previous employment undertaken in the past five years. All newly appointed officials shall be required, before starting work for the institution, to fill in and submit a comprehensive "declaration of interest" form which includes information about previous employers and previous clients covering at least the past five years. The first declaration of interest shall be submitted within 30 days from the date on which this Regulation enters into force, and then on 30 January in each year, irrespective of any change. In addition, a declaration of interest must be submitted at any time during the year if a change in circumstances has occurred or the individual changes his professional role, within 20 days after such change. The declaration of interest shall be scrutinised by the Appointing Authority when submitted for the first time and then annually or earlier if updates have been introduced. The declaration of interest shall be made public on the website of the institution to which the official belongs, within 20 days after its submission. The term "conflict of interest" shall be interpreted, in line with the definition promoted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, as meaning a conflict between the public duties and private interests of an official, in which the public official has private-capacity interests which could improperly influence the performance of his official duties and responsibilities". In addition, a conflict of interest shall also be deemed to exist in situations where former officials could use insider knowledge, know-how, influence and contacts gained whilst in the service of the institutions to benefit their own or their subsequent employers' or clients' financial interests.';
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 5 b (new) Staff Regulations Article 11 a – paragraph 1 a (new) 5b. The following paragraph shall be inserted in Article 11a: '1a. On the basis of the scrutiny referred to in paragraph 1, the Appointing Authority shall relieve the official from responsibility in any matter in which he has a conflict of interest as defined in paragraph 1. Additional appropriate measures may also be taken to ensure that the risk of conflicts of interest is eliminated. All institutions shall regularly publish a list of all such disqualifications.';
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 5 c (new) Staff Regulations Article 12 b – paragraph 1 5c. Article 12b(1) shall be replaced by the following: '1. Subject to Article 15, an official wishing to engage in an outside activity, whether paid or unpaid, or to carry out any assignment outside the Union, shall first obtain the permission of the Appointing Authority. Permission shall be refused only if the activity or assignment in question is such as to interfere with the performance of the official's duties or to call into question his independence and loyalty to the institution or is incompatible with the interests of the institution.';
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 5 d (new) Staff Regulations Article 16 Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 6 a (new) Staff Regulations Article 22 a Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 6 b (new) Staff Regulations Article 22 b Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 39 a (new) Staff Regulations Article 90 – paragraph 1 39a. Article 90(1) shall be replaced by the following: ‘1. Any person to whom these Staff Regulations apply may submit to the appointing authority a request that it take a decision relating to him. The authority shall notify the person concerned within three months from the date on which the request was made. If at the end of that period no reply to the request has been received, this shall be deemed to constitute an implied decision rejecting it, against which a complaint may be lodged in accordance with the following paragraph.’
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 39 b (new) Staff Regulations Article 90 – paragraph 2 39b. The second subparagraph of Article 90(2) shall be replaced by the following: The authority shall notify the person concerned within three months from the date on which the request was made. If at the end of that period no reply to the request has been received, this shall be deemed to constitute an implied decision rejecting it, against which a complaint may be lodged in accordance with the following paragraph.’
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 39 c (new) Staff Regulations Article 90 c a (new) 39c. The following article shall be inserted after Article 90: ‘Article 90ca 1. If a complaint pursuant to Article 90(2) is rejected by express or implied decision, the person concerned may ask that a mediation procedure be conducted with respect to this rejection decision. 2. This request must be made within one month and be addressed to the European Ombudsman. This period shall begin in accordance with the second sentence of Article 91(3). 3. Following receipt of this request, the European Ombudsman shall initiate a mediation procedure, pursuing a dialogue with and between the parties in an effort to find a solution to the dispute. In doing so, the European Ombudsman may also put forward its own solutions. 4. The European Ombudsman shall notify both parties of the end of the mediation procedure, when: - there is agreement between the parties, - both parties inform the European Ombudsman that agreement is not possible, - one of the parties informs the European Ombudsman that agreement is not possible and the European Ombudsman concurs, or - one of the parties states that agreement is not possible and more than six months have elapsed since the request for initiation of the mediation procedure.’
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 39 d (new) Staff Regulations Article 91 – paragraph 3 a (new) 39d. The following paragraph shall be inserted in Article 91: ‘3a. By way of derogation from paragraph 3, the period for an appeal under Article 2 shall begin following a mediation procedure conducted with the European Ombudsman and notification that the mediation procedure has ended in accordance with Article 90d(4)’.
source: PE-483.851
2012/06/03
CONT
6 amendments...
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new) Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union Article 22a Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6b (new) Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union Article 22b Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49 (ab) (new) Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union Annex VII - Section 2 - Article 4 - paragraph 2 (ab) Article 4 paragraph 2 shall be amended as follows: An official who is not and has never been a national of the State in whose territory he is employed and who does not fulfil the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 shall be entitled to a foreign residence allowance equal to one quarter of the expatriation allowance. If such an official has habitually resided in his place of employment for more than 10 consecutive years before he entered the service, he shall not be entitled to either expatriation or foreign residence allowance.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49 (ac) (new) Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union Annex VII - Section 2 - Article 4 - paragraph 3a (new) (ac) In Article 4 a new paragraph 3a is added: "Officials who fulfil the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 and who have resided in the European territory of the state where they are employed for more than 5 consecutive years since they entered the service shall be entitled to a foreign residence allowance equal to one quarter of the expatriation allowance."
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49 (ad) (new) Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union Annex VII - Section 2 - Article 4 - paragraph 3b (new) (ad) In Article 4 a new paragraph 3b is added: "Officials who fulfil the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 and who have resided in the European territory of the state where they are employed for more than 20 consecutive years since they entered the service shall not be entitled to either expatriation or foreign residence allowance."
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49 (c) - introductory part Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union Article 11 (c) Article 8 shall be
source: PE-483.645
|
| 7 |
2011/2073(INI) Budgetary control of EU humanitarian aid managed by ECHO
2011/11/16
CONT
7 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 – having regard to its previous resolutions of 26 September 2011 on ‘Towards a stronger European disaster response: the role of civil protection and humanitarian assistance’4 , of 19 January 2011 on ‘the situation in Haiti one year after the earthquake: humanitarian aid and reconstruction’5 , of 10 February 2010 on ‘the recent earthquake in Haiti’6 , of 18 December 2007 on the 'European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid', of 18 January 2011 on ‘Implementation of the European consensus on humanitarian aid: the mid-term review of its Action Plan and the way forward’7 ;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the enhanced flexibility and efficiency facilitated by the FPA 2008 as compared to the FPA 2005, such as a more result-oriented approach, the introduction of the A- and P-control mechanisms, simplification and less ambiguity through developing guidelines; calls on the Commission to continue refining the measures which improve the efficiency of cooperation with the FPA partners through the upcoming FPA in 2012; stresses that improving the efficiency of cooperation and reducing the excessive administrative burden for FPA partners, meanwhile, shall ensure a high level of accountability and transparency;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to improve the methods and practice of assessing whether a potential partner qualifies for the FPA or not; recalls that the experience before signing the FPA 2008 indicates that the initial assessment in favour of the partners under P-control mechanism, based on the reliability of their internal control systems and financial solidity, was too optimistic; notes that after being granted this status on the basis of initial assessment, partners under P-control mechanism are audited less frequently on their internal control systems, are allowed to use their own procurement procedures and their actions are not subject to contractual limits on funding; recalls that as a result of the assessment under FPA 2008 many of them had to be downgraded to A-partners, i.e. under the A-control mechanism;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the weaknesses identified during regular audits of the partners' systems are addressed by them in a timely manner and that necessary measures are taken if they are not; recalls that the external auditors have to continue working on improving the quality of their recommendations to the partners, taking into account partners' specific structures to ensure acceptance and feasibility of their implementation; stresses that further improvements in the documentation of the evaluation of proposals for humanitarian aid actions are necessary in terms of streamlining and standardising them and in order to allow an overall comparison;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the positive results of the discussions with the World Food Programme (WFP) and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), according to which WFP and UNICEF changed
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Draws attention to the frequent budgetary reinforcements of DG ECHO either through the use of Emergency Aid Reserve or through transfers from other budget lines from the external aid heading of the EDF; considers that budget reinforcement is a structural issue; stresses the necessity to draw up a realistic budget, allocating appropriations for natural disasters or humanitarian actions on the basis of repeated experience with spending in previous years;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Calls on DG ECHO to focus more on the sustainability of humanitarian actions; urges DG ECHO and other relevant Commission services to put greater emphasis on the DRR and disaster- preparedness, strengthen the resilience of the population at risk through capacity building, training, public awareness and establishing efficient early warning systems in disaster- prone and crisis-hit countries, in order to enable them to react correspondingly;
source: PE-475.972
|
| 3 |
2011/2201(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission
2012/07/03
CONT
3 amendments...
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 106 a (new) 106a. Recalls the earthquake in Haiti and its disastrous consequences; deplores the difficulties noted in combining humanitarian aid and development aid (linking relief, rehabilitation and development); considers that the Commission should limit its humanitarian aid and direct its efforts and funding to rehabilitation and development;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 106 b (new) 106b. Deplores the insufficient coordination between the Union Delegation and the ECHO representation; supports a reinforced coordination between all Union actors; urges therefore the Commission to ensure better coherence and complementarity between humanitarian aid and development aid both at a policy level and in practice;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 106 c (new) 106c Deplores the lack of sustainability of projects and stresses that projects should principally aim at creating employment and sustainable growth which would allow the Haitian State to increase its own revenues in order to depend less on foreign assistance; requests therefore the Commission to provide Parliament with a list of projects which have been carried out during the last 15 years in Haiti with a detailed assessment of their current situation in order to see how sustainable they are since;
source: PE-483.775
|
| 9 |
2011/2212(DEC) 2010 discharge: 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDF)
2012/06/03
CONT
9 amendments...
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the total amount of aid channelled through the EDF is undergoing a considerable increase as the amount of Union aid under the Tenth EDF for the period 2008 to 2013 has been set at EUR 22 682 000 000 which represents a
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Deplores Court of Auditors' finding according to which the overall supervisory and control systems of the EDFs managed by the Commission are partially effective; notes that the monitoring and supervision
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42. Notes with satisfaction the Communication ‘Increasing the impact of EU Development Policy: an Agenda for Change’ (COM(2011)0637) adopted in October 2011, stipulating
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 a (new) 48a. Recalls the earthquake in Haiti and its disastrous consequences; deplores the difficulties noted in combining humanitarian aid and development aid (linking relief, rehabilitation and development); considers that the Commission should limit its humanitarian aid and direct its efforts and funding to rehabilitation and development;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 b (new) 48b. Deplores the insufficient coordination between the Union delegation and the ECHO representation; supports a reinforced coordination between all Union actors; urges therefore the Commission to ensure better coherence and complementarity between humanitarian aid and development aid both at a policy level and in practice;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 c (new) 48c. Deplores lack of sustainability of projects and stresses that projects should principally aim at creating employment and sustainable growth which would allow the Haitian State to increase its own revenues in order to depend less on foreign assistance; requests therefore the Commission to provide Parliament with a list of projects which have been carried out during the last 15 years in Haiti with a detailed assessment of their current situation in order to see how sustainable they are since;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 54. Recalls that the funds allocated to the Investment Facility from the Tenth EDF amounted to EUR 1 530 000 000 for the ACP and OCT; notes that the total amount of signed operations from the Investment Facility portfolio was EUR 359 000 000 in the financial year 2010; recalls that the European Investment Bank (EIB) manages Investment Facility, a revolving risk-
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 60. Notes that the independent mid term evaluation of the EIB's
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 62 62. Recalls that
source: PE-483.643
|
| 15 |
2012/2168(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Parliament
2013/02/27
CONT
15 amendments...
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that scrutiny is necessary to ensure that Parliament's administration is held accountable and that only full and complete transparency offers citizens of the Union an insight into Parliament's use of the resources put at its disposal;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes that, on 22 September 2011, the representatives of the Bureau and of the Committee on Budgets reached agreement on additional saving measures that were subsequently incorporated into Parliament’s 2012 budget; firmly holds that those smart savings measures of almost EUR 40 000 000 do not affect either the efficiency of Parliament’s activities or the resources made available to each Member; calls on the Bureau to bring in an incentives scheme for Parliament officials which provides financial rewards for suggestions for successfully introduced savings through optimising work processes with no loss of administrative performance quality; calls on the Secretary-General to keep the Council and the Commission informed on Parliament's achievements and, to this end, to obtain information on their actions and to request to be informed of the answers received;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the new Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament with respect to financial interests and conflicts of interest adopted by its plenary on 1 December 2011; notes that Members are required to make full disclosure of any remunerated activities outside Parliament, of the remuneration they receive, and of any other functions that they perform which may give rise to conflicts of interest; further notes that the code expressly prohibits Members from accepting any sum of money or other gift in exchange for influencing Parliament decisions; notes with satisfaction that it lays down clear rules on accepting gifts and on former Members engaging in lobbying; firmly believes, however, that conflicts of interest must be checked on and penalised more stringently;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on Parliament’s Administration to publish all declarations of MEPs’ financial interests, broken down by year, in machine-readable form in the MEP profile section of Parliament's website;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Regrets the fact that a good number of declarations of MEPs’ financial interests are either blank or incomplete or formally incorrect;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Is concerned that, one year after the entry into force of the Code of Conduct, the implementing measures in respect of Article 5(3) - to ensure transparency with regard to Members’ travel, accommodation and subsistence expenses paid by third parties - have not yet been adopted; points out that it is imperative that the implementing measures be adopted quickly; firmly believes that all third-party-paid travel, accommodation and subsistence expenses of EUR 150 or more must be disclosed;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Is of the opinion that the Advisory Committee on the Conduct of Members must not only comprise MEPs, but, rather, must have a majority made up of external, independent experts permanently appointed;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Firmly believes that appropriate, mandatory remuneration must be introduced for all traineeships, including traineeships in MEPs’ offices and political groups, which last for more than one month and are not compulsory components of a degree or training course;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Takes the view that there can be independent European policy-making only if there is sufficient scientific and legal expertise in Parliament;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 c (new) 10c. Calls on the Bureau to give Parliament’s Legal Service the appropriate staffing and resources to enable each MEP to request legal opinions on a limited scale;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 d (new) 10d. Calls on the Bureau to set up a research service within Parliament with the appropriate staffing and resources to enable each MEP to request research studies on a limited scale;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Reiterates that the area of security is a very sensitive sector in any parliament, but even more so in a multinational one, with high visibility and constant visits from Heads of State and government; notes that the average daily presence in the Parliament's premises in Brussels is 12 000; invites the Secretary-General to present to the competent committee the situation in this respect and insists on the need to define classified security perimeters in Parliament's premises or security zones with different levels of security
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41. Takes note of the Bureau's adoption, by unanimity, of the "New global security concept" on 6 July 2011 which includes the idea of reserving the various entrances to Parliament for different categories of users; requests to be informed of the implementation of the "New global security concept" by the end of 2013;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 a (new) Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 b (new) source: PE-506.000
|
| 2 |
2012/2169(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Council
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Takes the view that publishing Union data makes innovations possible, brings about considerable overall economic benefits, and makes administrations more efficient; calls for the Council’s data to be made permanently available in machine- readable form, without charge, so as to make them freely reusable; is of the opinion that the data must not be constrained because of platform- or system-specific architecture and that the data format must be based on widely used and freely accessible standards and be supported and maintained by organisations which are independent of manufacturers; stresses that full documentation relating to format and all extensions must be made freely available; (Justification: For a modern, transparent administration, the fundamental principle of Open Government Data must apply.)
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Calls on the Council to publish, on its website, how many classified documents it has produced, broken down by level of classification, and how many classified documents, broken down by level of classification, it has received from (or forwarded to) individual institutions, other bodies and Member States of the European Union and third parties;
source: PE-506.055
|
| 1 |
2012/2170(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Justice
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Takes the view that publishing Union data makes innovations possible, brings about considerable overall economic benefits, and makes administrations more efficient; calls for the Court of Justice’s data to be made permanently available in machine-readable form, without charge, so as to make them freely reusable; is of the opinion that the data must not be constrained because of platform- or system-specific architecture and that the data format must be based on widely used and freely accessible standards and be supported and maintained by organisations which are independent of manufacturers; stresses that full documentation relating to format and all extensions must be made freely available; (Justification: For a modern, transparent administration, the fundamental principle of Open Government Data must apply.)
source: PE-506.049
|
| 1 |
2012/2171(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Auditors
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Takes the view that publishing Union data makes innovations possible, brings about considerable overall economic benefits, and makes administrations more efficient; calls for the Court of Auditors’ data to be made permanently available in machine-readable form, without charge, so as to make them freely reusable; is of the opinion that the data must not be constrained because of platform- or system-specific architecture and that the data format must be based on widely used and freely accessible standards and be supported and maintained by organisations which are independent of manufacturers; stresses that full documentation relating to format and all extensions must be made freely available; (Justification: For a modern, transparent administration, the fundamental principle of Open Government Data must apply.)
source: PE-506.046
|
| 1 |
2012/2172(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Economic and Social Committee
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Takes the view that publishing Union data makes innovations possible, brings about considerable overall economic benefits, and makes administrations more efficient; calls for the European Economic and Social Committee’s data to be made permanently available in machine-readable form, without charge, so as to make them freely reusable; is of the opinion that the data must not be constrained because of platform- or system-specific architecture and that the data format must be based on widely used and freely accessible standards and be supported and maintained by organisations which are independent of manufacturers; stresses that full documentation relating to format and all extensions must be made freely available; (Justification: For a modern, transparent administration, the fundamental principle of Open Government Data must apply.)
source: PE-506.052
|
| 1 |
2012/2173(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Committee of the Regions
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) source: PE-506.054
|
| 1 |
2012/2174(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Ombudsman
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Takes the view that publishing Union data makes innovations possible, brings about considerable overall economic benefits, and makes administrations more efficient; calls for the European Ombudsman’s data to be made permanently available in machine- readable form, without charge, so as to make them freely reusable; is of the opinion that the data must not be constrained because of platform- or system-specific architecture and that the data format must be based on widely used and freely accessible standards and be supported and maintained by organisations which are independent of manufacturers; stresses that full documentation relating to format and all extensions must be made freely available; (Justification: For a modern, transparent administration, the fundamental principle of Open Government Data must apply.)
source: PE-506.050
|
| 11 |
2012/2176(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European External Action Service
2013/02/26
CONT
11 amendments...
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Underscores the need for parliamentary oversight over the EU Intelligence Analysis Centre (INTCEN), the EU Military Staff Intelligence Division (EUMS INT), the Situation Room and the Satellite Centre, which produce analyses for decision-takers, inter alia on the basis of information forwarded by national intelligence services, and promote cooperation between those services;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Notes that INTCEN, EUMS INT and the Satellite Centre were incorporated into the EEAS, and the Situation Room established, in 2011; regrets that those entities, taken over from the Council’s General Secretariat, were set up within the EEAS on an ad hoc basis, with no coherent strategy and with no codecision role for the European Parliament; also regrets in this connection that SitCen, INTCEN’s predecessor, was set up in breach of Article 207(2) of the EC Treaty;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new) 18c. Notes with concern that, in her answers to the questions by the Committee on Budgetary Control in connection with the current discharge procedure, the High Representative was unable to provide information concerning funding for INTCEN, EUMS INT and the Situation Room and gave no precise figures for EUMS INT staffing;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 d (new) 18d. Calls for separate EEAS budget headings for INTCEN, EUMS INT and the Situation Room in order to ensure democratic oversight and transparency;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 e (new) 18e. Calls on the High Representative to provide detailed information on the budget and staffing for INTCEN, EUMS INT and the Situation Room in the EEAS’ annual activity report;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 f (new) 18f. Calls on the EEAS to publish, in its annual activity report, how many classified documents it has produced, broken down by level of classification, and how many classified documents, broken down by level of classification, it has received from (or forwarded to) individual institutions, other bodies and Member States of the European Union and third parties;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 g (new) 18g. Calls on the EEAS to produce an overview of the emoluments paid by Member States to national experts at INTCEN, EUMS INT and the Situation Room;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes with concern that 39,5% of Union ambassadors come from the Member States; recalls the agreement that one-third of posts should be filled by staff from Member States; urges that the High Representative implement the agreement, which means middle and senior posts are to be included in that quota;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Considers that the statistics in the annual activity report, especially in relation to data on delegations, are not sufficiently accurate; calls on the EEAS to improve its performance by establishing key performance indicators that will give some continuity to the evaluation of the performance of the delegations; calls on the High Representative to report to the Committee on Budgetary Control in this connection;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34a. Takes the view that publishing Union data makes innovations possible, brings about considerable overall economic benefits, and makes administrations more efficient; calls for the EEAS’ data to be made permanently available in machine- readable form, without charge, so as to make them freely reusable; is of the opinion that the data must not be constrained because of platform- or system-specific architecture and that the data format must be based on widely used and freely accessible standards and be supported and maintained by organisations which are independent of manufacturers; stresses that full documentation relating to format and all extensions must be made freely available; (Justification: For a modern, transparent administration, the fundamental principle of Open Government Data must apply.)
source: PE-506.047
|
| 1 |
2012/2200(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (FRONTEX)
2013/02/27
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) Transparency 7a. Calls on the Agency to publish how many classified documents it has produced, broken down by level of classification, and how many classified documents, broken down by level of classification, it has received from (or forwarded to) individual institutions, other bodies and Member States of the European Union and third parties;
source: PE-497.852
|
| 1 |
2012/2205(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Police Office (EUROPOL)
2013/02/27
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Office to publish how many classified documents it has produced, broken down by level of classification, and how many classified documents, broken down by level of classification, it has received from (or forwarded to) individual institutions, other bodies and Member States of the European Union and third parties;
source: PE-497.848
|
| 1 |
2012/2214(DEC) 2011 discharge: performance, financial management and control of EU agencies
2013/02/27
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Takes the view that publishing Union data makes innovations possible, brings about considerable overall economic benefits, and makes administrations more efficient; calls for the decentralised agencies’ data to be made permanently available in machine-readable form, without charge, so as to make them freely reusable; is of the opinion that the data must not be constrained because of platform- or system-specific architecture and that the data format must be based on widely used and freely accessible standards and be supported and maintained by organisations which are independent of manufacturers; stresses that full documentation relating to format and all extensions must be made freely available; (Justification: For a modern, transparent administration, the fundamental principle of Open Government Data must apply.)
source: PE-497.863
|
Martin EHRENHAUSER on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |