Jan MULDER
Constituencies
-
Netherlands
Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie
2010/06/22 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
Netherlands
Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Netherlands
Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
Netherlands
Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
Groups
-
ALDE
Member
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
2010/06/22 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
-
ALDE
Member
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
ELDR
Member
Group of the European Liberal, Democrat and Reform Party
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
ELDR
Member
Group of the European Liberal, Democrat and Reform Party
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
EP staff
Show earlier staff positions...
- Member of Conference of Committee Chairs 2011/10/03 - 2012/01/18
- Quaestor of European Parliament 2007/01/16 - 2009/07/13
- Quaestor of Parliament's Bureau 2007/01/16 - 2009/07/13
- Member of Quaestors 2007/01/16 - 2009/07/13
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Budgetary Control | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Member of | Committee on Budgets | 2012/07/05 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Special Committee on Organised Crime, Corruption and Money Laundering | 2012/03/28 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs | 2012/07/05 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substitute of | Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly | 2010/07/01 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Belarus | 2010/07/01 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2010/07/01 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia | 2007/03/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with South Africa | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
| Vice-Chair of | Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) | 2004/09/21 | 2007/03/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with South Africa | 2004/09/15 | 2007/03/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) | 2004/09/15 | 2004/09/20 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2002/02/06 | 2004/04/30 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Hungary Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2002/02/06 | 2004/04/30 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee | 1999/09/29 | 2002/01/14 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee | 1997/01/16 | 1999/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Slovenia Joint Parliamentary Committee | 1999/02/24 | 1999/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Slovenia | 1997/01/16 | 1999/02/23 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee | 1995/07/12 | 1997/01/15 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee | 1994/11/17 | 1995/07/11 |
Contact
Online
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45817
- Fax
- +322 28 49817
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 10G269
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75817
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79817
- Office
- Bât. Winston Churchill M02089
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Europees Parlement
- Wiertzstraat
- Altiero Spinelli 10G269
- B-1047 Brussel
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2013/2015(DEC) | Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2011 Commission discharge |
| Shadow | 2012/2167(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission |
| Shadow | 2012/0805(NLE) | Court of Auditors: appointment of a member, Leonard Orban - RO |
| Shadow | 2011/2212(DEC) | 2010 discharge: 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDF) |
| Responsible | 2011/0427(COD) | European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR) |
| Shadow | 2011/0367(COD) | Asylum and Migration Fund; Instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management: general provisions |
| Shadow | 2011/0366(COD) | Asylum and Migration Fund 2014-2020 |
| Shadow | 2011/0365(COD) | Internal Security Fund: instrument for financial support for external borders and visa 2014-2020 |
| Opinion | 2011/0177(APP) | Multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 |
| Responsible | 2010/0246(COD) | Explosives precursors: marketing and use |
| Shadow | 2010/0210(COD) | Seasonal employment: conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals |
| Shadow | 2010/0209(COD) | Intra-corporate transfer: conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals |
| Shadow | 2009/0186(NLE) | EU/Australia agreement: processing and transfer of EU-sourced passenger name record (PNR) data by air carriers to the Australian Customs Service |
| Opinion | 2008/2054(INI) | The financial aspects of the Reform Treaty |
| Opinion | 2007/2019(BUD) | 2008 budget: section III, Commission |
| Responsible | 2007/0177(CNS) | Common agricultural policy CAP: common rules for direct support schemes and certain support schemes for farmers (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003) and support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005). |
| Opinion | 2007/0151(CNS) | Framework financial regulation for the Community bodies referred to in Article 185 Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (amend. Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002) |
| Opinion | 2007/0045(CNS) | Common agricultural policy CAP: financing (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005) |
| Responsible | 2006/0082(CNS) | Rural development: support by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development EAFRD (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005) |
| Responsible | 2005/2140(INI) | Minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation |
| Responsible | 2005/2090(DEC) | 2004 discharge: EC general budget, section III, Commission and ECSC in liquidation |
| Opinion | 2005/2001(BUD) | 2006 budget: Section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2005/0063(CNS) | Expenditure in the veterinary field: measures to combat avian influenza, Community financial assistance (amend. Decision 90/424/EEC) |
| Opinion | 2005/0062(CNS) | Animal diseases and public health: measures for the control of avian influenza (repeal. Directive 92/40/EEC) |
| Responsible | 2004/2223(BUD) | Amending budget 10/2004: section III Commission, general statement of revenue |
| Opinion | 2004/2209(INI) | Policy challenges and budgetary means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 |
| Opinion | 2004/2099(ACI) | Budget: interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management for the period 2007-2013 |
| Responsible | 2004/2066(BUD) | Amending budget 8/2004: corrections 2002 and 2003, distribution of own resources |
| Responsible | 2004/2039(BUD) | Amending budget 7/2004: section III Commission, balance of budget 2003 |
| Responsible | 2004/2023(BUD) | Amending budget 3/2004: section III Solidarity Fund, natural disasters in the Member States from the South |
| Responsible | 2004/2009(BUD) | Amending budget 1/2004: section III Commission, supplementary expenditure fot the 2004 enlargement |
| Opinion | 2004/2006(INI) | Building our common future : policy challenges and budgetary means for the enlarged Union 2007-2013 |
| Opinion | 2004/0171(CNS) | European Communities' own resources: implementing measures for the correction of the budgetary imbalances |
| Opinion | 2004/0169(CNS) | Fisheries common policy: structural sector, European Fisheries Fund |
| Opinion | 2004/0164(CNS) | Common agricultural policy CAP: financing by the European agricultural guarantee Fund EAGF and the European agricultural Fund for rural development EAFRD (repeal. Regulations (EC) No 1258/1999 and (EC) No 723/97) |
| Opinion | 2004/0163(AVC) | Economic and social cohesion policy: objectives, criteria to be eligible and financial resources of the European Regional Development Fund ERDF, European Social Fund ESF and the Cohesion Fund (repeal. Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999) |
| Responsible | 2003/2259(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: European Training Foundation |
| Responsible | 2003/2258(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market |
| Responsible | 2003/2257(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: Community Plant Variety Office |
| Responsible | 2003/2256(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: Eurojust |
| Responsible | 2003/2255(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products |
| Responsible | 2003/2247(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union |
| Responsible | 2003/2246(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work |
| Responsible | 2003/2245(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: European Environment Agency |
| Responsible | 2003/2244(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction |
| Responsible | 2003/2243(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: European Centre on Racism and Xenophobia |
| Responsible | 2003/2242(DEC) | 2002 Discharge : budget for the European Agency for reconstruction and aid for Kosovo |
| Responsible | 2003/2241(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions EFILWC, Dublin |
| Responsible | 2003/2240(DEC) | 2002 Discharge: European Center for the Development of Vocattional Training ECDVT, Thessalonica |
| Responsible | 2003/2027(BUD) | 2004 budget: conciliation procedure |
| Responsible | 2003/2002(BUD) | 2004 budget: others sections |
| Responsible | 2003/2001(BUD) | 2004 Budget: section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2003/0293(COD) | European Audiovisual Observatory: Community participation till 31.12.2006 (amend. Decision 1999/784/EC) |
| Opinion | 2003/0279(CNS) | Olive oil and table olives: common organisation of the market CMO (amend. Regulation (ECC) No 827/68 and repeal. Regulation No 14) |
| Opinion | 2003/0278(CNS) | Common agricultural policy CAP: horizontal regulation, support schemes for farmers (modif. Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003) |
| Opinion | 2003/0216(CNS) | Hops: common organisation of the market CMO, extension of the aid to 2004 (amend. Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71) |
| Opinion | 2003/0212(CNS) | Agricultural prices 2004/2005: aid for seeds (derog. Regulation (EEC) No 2358/71) |
| Opinion | 2003/0210(COD) | Protection of groundwater: prevention and control of pollution |
| Opinion | 2003/0039(COD) | Political parties at European level: statute and financing |
| Responsible | 2002/2149(INI) | Reform of the procedure of the clearance of accounts |
| Opinion | 2001/2060(REG) | EP Rules of procedure: reform of budgetary control procedures and institutions for the discharge (point 18 resolution INI/2000/2008) |
| Opinion | 2001/0273(CNS) | Potato starch: quota system for production (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1868/94) |
| Opinion | 2001/0254(COD) | Veterinary medicinal products: Community code (amend. Directive 2001/82/EC) |
| Opinion | 2001/0253(COD) | Medicinal products for human use: Community code (amend. Directive 2001/83/EC) |
| Opinion | 2001/0252(COD) | Medicinal products for human and veterinary use: authorisation and supervision, European Agency for evaluation |
| Responsible | 2000/2098(DEC) | 1995 discharge: clearance of accounts EAGGF-Guarantee |
| Opinion | 2000/0250(CNS) | Sugar: common organisation of the markets CMO (Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999) |
| Opinion | 2000/0226(CNS) | Agricultural products: information provision and promotion on the internal market |
| Opinion | 2000/0050(CNS) | Agricultural prices 2000/2001: pigmeat, common organisation of the markets CMO (amend. Regulation (EEC) n° 2759/75) |
| Opinion | 2000/0049(CNS) | Agricultural prices 2000/2001: sheepmeat and goat meat, common organisation of the markets (amend. Regulation (EC) No 2467/98) |
| Opinion | 2000/0048(CNS) | Agricultural prices 2000/2001: silkworms (amend. Regulation (EEC) No 845/72) |
| Opinion | 2000/0047(CNS) | Agricultural prices 2000/2001: sugar price, standard quality of beet |
| Opinion | 2000/0046(CNS) | Agricultural prices 2000/2001: rice, common orgnization of the market CMO (amend. Regulation (EC) No 3072/95) |
| Opinion | 2000/0045(CNS) | Agricultural prices 2000/2001: cereals, common organisation of the markets CMO (amend. Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92) |
| Opinion | 1999/0246(CNS) | Milk, milk products: common organisation of the markets CMO (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999) |
| Opinion | 1999/0139(CNS) | Financing the Union 2000-2006: own resources, European Council, Berlin, March 1999 |
| Opinion | 1998/2601(INI) | Comitology: modification of the procedures for the exerciseof implementing powers conferred on the Commission |
| Responsible | 1998/2012(DEC) | 1994 discharge: clearance of accounts EAGGF-Guarantee |
| Opinion | 1998/0219(CNS) | Comitology, follow-up to Amsterdam: procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission |
| Responsible | 1998/0112(CNS) | Agenda 2000: financing of the common agricutural policy |
| Responsible | 1997/2167(DEC) | 1993 discharge: clearance of accounts EAGGF-Guarantee |
| Opinion | 1997/2005(BUD) | Ad hoc procedure for agricultural expenditure |
| Responsible | 1996/2233(INI) | Quality policy for agricultural products and agri-foodstuffs |
| Responsible | 1996/2081(COS) | EAGGF: discharge for clearance of 1992 EAGGF accounts |
| Opinion | 1995/0250(CNS) | Improving Community agricultural statistics |
| Opinion | 1995/0244(CNS) | EAGGF Guarantee section, control of expenditure: member states' action programmes |
| Opinion | 1994/0324(CNS) | Value added tax VAT: taxation of agricultural outputs (amend. Direct. 77/388/EEC) |
| Responsible | 1994/0265(CNS) | Unit of account and the conversion rates to be applied for the purposes of the CAP |
Born
1943/10/03 Diever- Agricultural engineer (1970).
- Assistant FAO expert and subsequently FAO expert in Kenya (1970-1975). Official of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Hague (1975-1976). Official of the European Commission, Brussels (1976-1994).
- Chairman of the VVD Brussels section (1977-1988).
- Member of the European Parliament (since 1994).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 1 |
2008/0242(COD) Asylum: EURODAC system for the comparison of fingerprints of third-country national or stateless applicants. Recast
2010/10/12
LIBE
1 amendments...
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) It is appropriate to monitor and evaluate the performance of EURODAC a
source: PE-454.518
|
| 1 |
2009/0164(COD) International protection: standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons and the content of the protection granted. Recast
2010/10/27
LIBE
1 amendments...
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. In examining whether an applicant has access to protection against persecution or serious harm in a part of the country of origin in accordance with paragraph 1, Member States shall at the time of taking the decision on the application have regard to the general circumstances prevailing in that part of the country and to the personal circumstances of the applicant, in accordance with Article 4. To this end, Member States shall ensure that precise and up-to-date information is obtained from various sources, such as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the European Asylum Support Office.
source: PE-452.552
|
| 17 |
2010/0064(COD) Combating sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children and child pornography
2011/01/19
LIBE
17 amendments...
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Causing a child to participate in pornographic performances shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least two years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. Profiting from or otherwise exploiting a child participating in pornographic performances shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least two years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. Knowingly attending pornographic performances involving the participation of children shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least two years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Recruiting a child to participate in pornographic performances shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least five years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 6 6. Causing a child to participate in child prostitution shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least five years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 7 7. Profiting from or otherwise exploiting a child participating in child prostitution shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least five years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 8 8. Engaging in sexual activities with a child, where recourse is made to child prostitution shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least five years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 9 9. Coercing a child to participate in pornographic performances shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least eight years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 10 10. Recruiting a child to participate in child prostitution shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least eight years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 11 11. Coercing a child into child prostitution shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least ten years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. Acquisition or possession of child pornography shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least one year and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Knowingly obtaining access, by means of information and communication technology, to child pornography shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least one year and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 4 4. Distribution, dissemination or transmission of child pornography shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least two years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 5 5. Offering, supplying or making available child pornography shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least two years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 6 6. Production of child pornography shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least five years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 The proposal, by means of information and communication technology, by an adult to meet a child who has not reached the age of sexual consent under national law, for the purpose of committing any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 (3) and Article 5 (6), where this proposal has been followed by material acts leading to such a meeting, shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least two years and an appropriate fine.
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Member States authorities shall insure by any appropriate means and in accordance with national law that such information may also be obtained from the criminal records held in other Member States. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that
source: PE-456.647
|
| 10 |
2010/0209(COD) Intra-corporate transfer: conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals
2011/07/22
LIBE
10 amendments...
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) As a result of the globalisation of business, increasing trade and the growth and spread of multinational corporations, in recent years movements of managerial and technical employees of branches and subsidiaries of multinationals
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point k (k) ‘single application procedure’ means the procedure leading, on the basis of one application
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States may reject an application on the grounds of volumes of admission of third-country nationals. When adequate alternatives for graduates can be found nationally, they have preference.
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall determine whether an application is to be made by the third- country national or by the host entity. If the application is to be submitted by the third-country national, Member States shall allow the application to be introduced from a third country or, if provided for by national law, on the territory of the Member State in which he or she is already legally present.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The intra-corporate transferee permit shall be a single document. Member States may indicate additional information related to the employment relationship of the third-country national in paper format, or store such data in electronic format as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) 1030/2002 and point 16 of its Annex I as amended by Regulation (EC) 380/2008.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. By way of derogation from the first subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Directive 2003/86/EC, residence permits for family members shall be granted by the first Member State, if the conditions for family reunification are fulfilled, at the latest within
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the duration of the transfer in the other Member State(s) does not exceed t
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 If the duration of the transfer in the other Member State exceeds t
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where the relevant legislation requires a visa or residence permit for exercising mobility, such visas or permits shall be granted in a
source: PE-467.241
|
| 8 |
2010/0210(COD) Seasonal employment: conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals
2011/07/20
LIBE, EMPL
8 amendments...
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This directive shall apply to the agriculture, horticulture and tourism sectors. Member States may decide to extend its application to additional activities that are dependent on the passing of the seasons. This additional activity has to be approved by the Commission.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point e (e) ‘single application procedure’ means a procedure leading, on the basis of one application
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States may reject an application on the grounds of volumes of admission of third-country nationals. It should be avoided that the number of third country nationals who applies for seasonal work, should be greater than that of the nationals of the Member State who are looking to find a job as a seasonal worker.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall determine whether an application is to be made by the third- country national or by the employer. If the application is to be submitted by the third- country national, Member States shall allow the application to be introduced from a third country or, if provided for by national law, on the territory of the Member State in which he or she is already legally present.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The seasonal worker permit shall be a single document. Member States may indicate additional information related to the employment relationship of the third- country national in paper format, or store such data in electronic format as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) 1030/2002 and point 16 of its Annex I as amended by Regulation (EC) 380/2008.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. Seasonal workers shall be allowed to reside for a maximum of six months in any
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 Member States shall require employers of seasonal workers to provide evidence that the seasonal worker will benefit from accommodation that ensures an adequate standard of living according to the minimum standards of national law. If seasonal workers are required to pay rent for such accommodation, its cost shall not be excessive in relation to their remuneration.
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 Every t
source: PE-467.243
|
| 7 |
2010/0246(COD) Explosives precursors: marketing and use
2011/07/19
LIBE
7 amendments...
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) The licensing scheme and the obligation to report suspicious transactions should allow economic operators to continue trading all precursors, thereby limiting its impact on the freedom to conduct a business.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Limiting the sales of those chemicals that exceed concentration thresholds to users who can prove a legitimate need to use the chemical should provide higher security in the marketing and use of explosives precursors.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (4) ‘suspicious transaction’ means any transaction concerning the substances listed in the Annexes, or mixtures containing those substances, where there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the substance or mixture is intended for the production of home-made explosives, notably because of its unusual quantity, concentration, combination and frequency;
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. Each Member State shall set up a national contact point with a clearly identified telephone number and e-mail address for the reporting of suspicious transactions. Such contact points shall be staffed by personnel of the law enforcement agencies.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Reporting under this Article shall be limited to the name, licence number, items purchased, the amount of the transaction and the method of payment and the reasons giving rise to suspicion, for a maximum period of 2 years, unless a suspicious transaction or theft has led to an investigation which is still ongoing. The processing of personal data revealing racial or ethic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade- union membership, as well as the processing of data concerning health or sex life, is prohibited.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 Each Member State shall ensure that the processing of personal data carried out in application of this Regulation shall be in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC. In particular, each Member State shall ensure that the processing of personal data required by the granting of license pursuant to Articles 4 and 5 of this Regulation, and the reporting of suspicious transactions pursuant to Article 6 of this Regulation, shall comply with Directive 95/46/EC. Guidelines contained in the implementing decisions referred to in Articles 5(6) and 6(6) shall ensure that: - information is only disclosed to competent law enforcement authorities for the purpose of investigating terrorist activities or other suspected criminal abuse of explosive precursors; - the licensing authority shall inform license holders about the fact that their purchases will be recorded and may be subject to reporting if found suspicious; - a clear and concrete definition of suspicious transactions is provided, as well as criteria to identify them; - data security is guaranteed; - data is accessible only on a need to know basis and the list of recipients is published; - data subjects have a right of access correction or deletion, when appropriate, and a redress mechanism is foreseen. The European Data Protection Supervisor shall be consulted prior to drawing up these guidelines.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 A review of this Regulation shall be made [
source: PE-469.861
|
| 3 |
2010/0273(COD) Judicial cooperation in criminal matters: combating attacks against information systems
2012/01/27
LIBE
3 amendments...
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Member States should provide for penalties in respect of attacks against information systems. The penalties provided for should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and could include imprisonment and/or financial penalties.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 8 are punishable by effective, proportional and dissuasive criminal penalties, including the imposition of adequate fines.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 7 are punishable by criminal penalties of a maximum term of imprisonment of at least two years including the imposition of an adequate fine.
source: PE-480.665
|
| 3 |
2010/0312(COD) Schengen: evaluation mechanism to verify application of the Schengen acquis
2011/05/30
LIBE
3 amendments...
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The experience gathered during previous evaluations demonstrates the need to maintain a coherent evaluation mechanism covering, all areas of the Schengen acquis, except those where a specific evaluation mechanism already exists within EU law, judicial reform, and the fight against corruption and organised crime.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. By not later than 30 September each year, Frontex shall submit to the Commission a risk analysis taking into account migratory pressure and making recommendations for priorities for evaluations in the next year. The recommendations shall refer to specific sections of the external borders and to specific border crossing-points to be evaluated in the next year under the multiannual programme. The Commission shall make this risk analysis available to the Member States and to the European Parliament.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. A report shall be drawn up following each evaluation. The report shall be based on the findings of the on-site visit and the questionnaire
source: PE-464.941
|
| 20 |
2010/0395(COD) Financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union
2011/06/17
BUDG
20 amendments...
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The budgetary provisions shall apply mutatis mutandis to the guarantee for borrowing-and-lending operations entered into by the Union in the management of the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European Financial Stability Mechanism (EFSM) and payments to the Guarantee Fund for external actions.
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 4 4. Interest yielded by the funds which are the property of the Union shall not be due to the Union save otherwise provided for in the agreements concluded with the entrusted entities listed in points (ii) to (viii) of Article 55(1)(b)
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 15 – paragraph 1 1. The balance from each financial year shall be entered in the budget for the following financial year as revenue in the case of a surplus or as a payment appropriation in the case of a deficit, in strict accordance with Article 7 of the Council Decision on Own resources, not including a quasi-automatic adaptation of Member States' contributions to the Union budget.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The surplus and the unspent commitments of the previous budgetary years of the current multi-annual financial framework as well as decommitted appropriations shall be entered in the reserve for payments and commitments. This reserve shall be used in first instance for any additional and/or unforeseen needs as well as to compensate any negative reserve, which procedure is laid down in article 44. The decision to mobilise this reserve will be taken jointly by the two arms of the budgetary authority following a proposal by the Commission.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 22 – paragraph 3 3. Any institution other than the Commission may propose to the budgetary authority, within its own section of the budget, transfers from one title to another exceeding the limit of 1
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 23 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) as regards expenditure on staff and administration
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 23 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) as regards operational expenditure, transfer appropriations between chapters within the same title, up to a maximum total of 1
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 29 Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 34 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The draft budget shall contain a summary general statement of the expenditure and revenue of the Union, including a summary general statement of the reserve for payments and commitments, and consolidate the estimates referred to in Article 32.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 34 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The Commission shall accompany the draft budget with a proposal to mobilise the reserve for payments and commitments for any arising needs not initially foreseen in the annual budget or the regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 38 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall, save in
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 44 – paragraph 2 This reserve must be drawn upon as soon as possible and before the end of the financial year, in first instance by means of the reserve for payments and commitments, as laid down in Article 15 (3a), or by means of transfer in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 21 and 23.
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 46 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) as regards funding to international organisations, the Commission will specify in a document annexed to its section: (i) a summary of all those contributions, with a breakdown per EU programme/fund and per international organisation, (ii) a justification explaining why it was more efficient for the EU to fund those international organisations rather than to act directly.
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 56 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall respect the principles of sound financial management, transparency and non-discrimination and ensure the visibility of Union action when they manage Union funds. To this end, Member States shall fulfil the control and audit obligations and assume the resulting responsibilities laid down in this Regulation. Complementary provisions
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 56 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. National declarations of assurance Member States shall provide a national declaration on the expenditure made under the system of shared management. Such declaration shall be signed at the appropriate political level, and be based on the information to be provided under paragraph 5(c), and shall at least cover the effective functioning of the internal control systems in place and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. It shall be subject to the opinion of an independent audit body and be provided to the Commission by 15 March of the year following the budgetary year concerned.
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 116 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) reimbursement of a specified proportion of the eligible costs actually incurred, taking into account the full economic costs for the purpose of the project;
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 116 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) a combination of the forms referred to in points (a) to (d)
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 116 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) For the purpose of this regulation, "very low value grants" shall be grants not exceeding EUR 10.000 and "low value grants" shall be grants not exceeding EUR 100.000. For those kind of grants, lower standards in accounting and authorisation maybe applied in order to create a beneficiary driven approach.
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 117 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. For the purpose of this regulation, grants may also be authorised in the field of basic research, where no outcome or result can be presented in consequence of the research activity.
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 117 – paragraph 6 6. For lumps sums, standard scale of unit costs and flat rate financing, the no-profit and the co-financing rules laid down in paragraphs 3 and 4 shall be reasonably ensured at the time of their determination or at the stage of the evaluation of the grant application. Where the maximum amount per grant does not exceed EUR 100.000, the authorisation may be given by the competent officer.
source: PE-467.051
|
| 3 |
2010/0820(NLE) Schengen: full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Bulgaria and Romania
2011/04/14
LIBE
3 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Expresses deep concern about corruption in the Member States, and stresses that the European Union must set requirements to fight corruption based on measurable criteria and standards.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 From the XXXX 20
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 To the extent that those provisions regulate the abolition of checks on persons at internal borders, they shall apply as from XXXX 20
source: PE-462.863
|
| 1 |
2010/2104(INI) Efficiency and effectiveness of EU funding in the area of decommissioning nuclear power plants in the new Member States
2011/04/02
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes with concern that the detailed decommissioning plans of the three decommissioning programmes in question have not yet been finalised and, as a consequence, that there is no information on the timetables, nor on the costs of particular projects, nor on their sources of funding;
source: PE-458.505
|
| 6 |
2010/2114(INI) Strengthening chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear security in the European Union – an EU CBRN Action Plan
2010/11/11
LIBE
6 amendments...
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the EU should strengthen its common approach to CBRN prevention, detection and response through the creation of specific mechanisms (regulatory, legislative or non-legislative instruments) which make cooperation and the provision of means of assistance compulsory in the event of a CBRN disaster caused by an accident or terrorist attack; recalls that the main objective of the EU institutions should be to ensure the efficiency of a national or transnational response to a CBRN accident or terrorist attack, on the basis of EU solidarity, in a coordinated manner under the auspices of the Commission and with a pan-European outreach;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls for EU quality and security standards, as well as an EU system and network of laboratories for the certification of CBRN security equipment and technologies, to be developed; again under the leadership of the Commission, stresses that the necessary research and development funding should be provided to ensure that applied research and major demonstration programmes with an EU dimension are carried out, and that an EU industrial policy in the field of civil security is needed, stimulating cooperation between enterprises in the EU and with specific support for small and medium- sized enterprises/small and medium-sized industries (SMEs/SMIs);
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls for the urgent establishment of a European crisis-response mechanism based in the Commission services which should coordinate civilian and military means so as to ensure that the EU has a rapid- response capability to deal with a CBRN disaster; and reiterates its call for the establishment of a EU Civil Protection Force based on the existing EU Civil Protection Mechanism, which will enable the Union to bring together the resources necessary for providing emergency assistance, including humanitarian aid, within 24 hours of a CBRN disaster inside or outside EU territory;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that suitable bridges and partnerships should also be built between bodies such as Europol, Interpol and law- enforcement authorities in the Member States with a view to creating an appropriate and effective network for proactive anticipation/real-time monitoring of emergencies and operational engagement/coordination to deal with CBRN-related disasters, and report to the Commission as well;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Council to entrust the Commission with the role of
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Draws attention to the fact that the Commission,
source: PE-450.643
|
| 4 |
2010/2137(INI) Report on competition policy 2009
2010/07/10
TRAN
4 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Invites the Commission to give an overview on taxation,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission, while reviewing legislation on passenger rights and reimbursement for delays, to
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need to avoid unfair competition within the liberalised road transport sector by guaranteeing that social, safety and environmental rules are properly applied, paying special attention to the opening of this market for cabotage
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to publish clear guidelines on state support, particularly in the maritime area, to ensure there is a level playing-field in the European transport market;
source: PE-449.026
|
| 1 |
2010/2151(DEC) 2009 discharge: Eighth, Ninth and Tenth European Development Funds EDF
2011/09/03
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines once more, that the Tenth EDF should focus on a limited number of areas, while involving non-governmental organisations (NGOs) that are effective at local level and who are of crucial importance for sustainable development, in order to avoid the harmful effects arising from the proliferation of objectives; calls on the Commission to make wise use of local- and European-based NGO
source: PE-460.802
|
| 1 |
2010/2154(INI) Aviation security with a special focus on security scanners
2011/03/25
LIBE
1 amendments...
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to impose deterrent sanctions for unauthorized recording or distribution of security screening images;
source: PE-460.651
|
| 2 |
2010/2211(INI) Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe
2011/04/13
SURE
1 amendments...
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Stresses that the improvement of the financial management in the Union must be supported by a close monitoring of progress in the Commission and in the Member States; insists that Member States should assume responsibility in the management of EU funds and honour their commitment made in the previous IIA to issue annual national declarations on the use of EU funds at the appropriate political level;
source: PE-462.729
2011/05/04
SURE
1 amendments...
Amendment 677 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 65 65. Stresses that a successful and strengthened cohesion policy needs adequate funding, which should not be less than in the current financial programming period; reiterates, in this context, its strong request to ensure that, in the next MFF, the unspent or decommitted resources of cohesion funds remain in the cohesion budget and not be returned to the Member States; is of the opinion that the cofinancing rates of the cohesion policy could vary. Poorer member states should have a lower national cofinancing rate than the richer ones so as to promote that needier countries can use their aid more effectively.
source: PE-462.731
|
| 1 |
2010/2248(INI) EIB annual report for 2009
2011/02/02
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to obtain a statement from the EIB concerning activities with major multiplier effects which are guaranteed by the European budget;
source: PE-458.477
|
| 2 |
2010/2273(INI) Promoting workers' mobility within the European Union
2011/04/05
LIBE
2 amendments...
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for closer and more efficient cooperation between the competent national authorities in checking the compliance of labour contracts with national and EU law; points out that mutual assistance and information exchange have to be guaranteed between the Member States in case of breaches; ask the Commission to supervise this process;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Urges the Member States to control
source: PE-464.709
|
| 1 |
2010/2276(INI) EU strategy on Roma inclusion
2011/01/17
LIBE
1 amendments...
Amendment 321 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Requests the Commission to provide Parliament with a list of projects benefitting the Roma population which have been financed by the Commission during the last ten years, giving indications about the results achieved;
source: PE-456.648
|
| 3 |
2011/0129(COD) Rights, support and protection of victims of crime: minimum standards
2012/06/03
FEMM
3 amendments...
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States shall ensure that victims who wish to report a crime and who do not understand or speak the language of the competent authority, shall be enabled to report the crime. In order to achieve this result Member States shall as a minimum ensure that the victims are assisted in reporting the crime in a language that they understand.
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Member States shall ensure that a victim who reports a crime, is notified in a simple and accessible language on the victim’s right to receive information regarding the rights to active participation in the criminal proceedings.
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) the essential parts of the complaint of the criminal offence to the competent authority;
source: PE-483.693
|
| 13 |
2011/0154(COD) Judicial cooperation in criminal matters: right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and right to communicate upon arrest
2012/03/22
LIBE
13 amendments...
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The European Court of Human Rights has consistently held that the suspect or accused person should have access to a lawyer
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8a) The suspect or accused person has a right to legal assistance during an official interview that takes place in a police station or in a comparable place. A place is comparable to a police station when that place is, like a police station, suitable and equipped for interviewing suspected or accused persons about their alleged engagement in a criminal offence.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) To be effective, access to a lawyer should entail the possibility for the lawyer to carry out all the wide range of activities which pertain to legal counselling, as the European Court of Human Rights has held.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 a (new) (11a) ) In order for the right to legal assistance to be practical and effective the suspect who has no lawyer should be provided with one when he is deprived of liberty. In proceedings before the court the suspect who has no lawyer should be provided with one when the interest of justice so require. There is no obligation to provide a lawyer when the suspect or accused person has waived his right to legal assistance in accordance with Article 9. Neither is it obligatory to provide a lawyer in the pre-trial stage when the suspected or accused person is not deprived of his liberty or in the trial stage when the interests of justice do not require that a lawyer is provided. In these cases the obligation of Member States to ensure the right to legal assistance is met when the lawyer is allowed to give legal assistance.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) before the start of an
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. An official interview in the meaning of this Article is an interview of the suspect or accused person that takes place in a police station or another appropriate place.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notwithstanding provisions of national law concerning the mandatory presence of a lawyer, Member States shall ensure that in all cases where the suspect or accused person is deprived of liberty and, when the interests of justice so require, during the trial stage before a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters, a suspect or accused person who has no lawyer is provided with a lawyer, unless he has waived his right to legal assistance in accordance with Article 9.
source: PE-486.050
|
| 5 |
2011/0177(APP) Multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020
2012/05/10
BUDG
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution citation 8a (new) - having regard to the joint agreed statement on MFF-related issues attached to the consolidate agreement on revised Financial rules applicable to the general rules to the general budget of the Union;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17a (new) 17a. Is particularly concerned about the current ever-growing level of RALs; calls for a joint-interinstitutional strategy for keeping the level of RALs under control in the next Multiannual Financial Framework period and for appropriate measures to be taken in this regard, such as a strict application of the N+2 de- commitment rule to all Member States without derogation;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Believes that the effectiveness of EU expenditure depends on sound policy, regulatory and institutional frameworks at all levels; insists that, in accordance with Article 317 TFEU Member States, must shoulder their share of responsibility in making EU funding more effective; recalls that 90 % of the errors detected by the European Court of Auditors have been in Member States, and that the majority of those errors could have been avoided;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47.
source: PE-496.663
2012/09/24
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Takes into account the important and ongoing changes in the real economy of the Member States due to the crisis; insists therefore that the actions provisioned in the MFF 2014-2020 consider the Member States´ current economic and social situation and where appropriate to be re-adjusted in order to be aligned with the overall objective of ‘The contribution of European policies to growth and employment’ as stated in the European Council’s conclusions of 28-29 June 2012;
source: PE-496.477
|
| 1 |
2011/0273(COD) European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): support to the European territorial cooperation goal
2012/04/05
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Regulation (EU) No [...]/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the annual budget of the Union lays down the general principles with regard to the implementation of the annual budget of the Union. It is, therefore, necessary to ensure consistency between that Regulation and the provisions governing the ERDF.
source: PE-489.342
|
| 1 |
2011/0276(COD) Structural instruments: common provisions for ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD and EMFF; general provisions applicable to ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund
2012/07/05
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Regulation (EU) No [...] on the financial rules applicable to the annual budget of the Union lays down the general principles with regard to the implementation of the annual budget of the Union. Therefore it is necessary to ensure consistency between that Regulation and the provisions governing this Regulation.
source: PE-489.347
|
| 9 |
2011/0288(COD) Common agricultural policy (CAP): financing, management and monitoring 2014-2020
2012/11/07
CONT
9 amendments...
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 The certification body shall be a public or private audit body designated by the Member State which shall provide an opinion, drawn up in accordance with internationally accepted audit standards, following risk-based controls and taking into account the past performance of the Member State, on the management declaration of assurance covering the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the annual accounts of the paying agency, the proper functioning of
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) the sustainable development of the economical activity of
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 Whe
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The Commission shall give sufficient prior notice of an on-the-spot check to the Member State concerned or the Member State within whose territory the check is to take place and shall coordinate checks with a view to reducing any negative impact on paying agencies. Agents from the Member State concerned may take part in such checks.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall assess the amounts to be excluded on the basis of the gravity of the non-conformity recorded. It shall take due account of the nature and gravity of the infringement and
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission shall base its financial corrections on individual cases of irregularity identified, or by taking account of the systemic nature of the irregularity to determine whether an extrapolated or flat rate correction should be applied. Flat rate corrections shall only be applied where it is impossible, due to the nature of the case, to either identify the extent and amount of the irregularity found or to extrapolate the amount to be corrected.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 1. The system set up by the Member States in accordance with Article 60(2) shall include, except where otherwise provided, systematic administrative checking of a
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 2 2. As regards the on-the-spot checks, the authority responsible shall draw its check sample from the entire population of applicants comprising, where appropriate, a random part and a risk-based part in order to obtain a representative error rate, while targeting also
source: PE-492.904
|
| 5 |
2011/0365(COD) Internal Security Fund: instrument for financial support for external borders and visa 2014-2020
2012/09/18
LIBE
5 amendments...
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – paragraph 2 The achievement of this objective shall be measured by the Commission against indicators such as, inter alia, the number of consular posts equipped, secured and/or enhanced to ensure the efficient processing of visa applications and provide quality of service to visa applicants and the number of apprehended overstayers.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – paragraph 2 The achievement of this objective shall be measured by the Commission against indicators such as, inter alia, the development of equipment for border control and the apprehensions of irregular third-country nationals at the external border in correspondence with the risk of the relevant section of the external border.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – concluding paragraph Member States shall provide the Commission with the necessary information that is required for the assessment of the achievements, as measured against the indicators. The Commission shall be responsible for the assessment of the achievements.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) promoting the development and implementation of policies ensuring the
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) gradually establishing an integrated management system based on solidarity and responsibility for external borders, including the reinforcement of interagency co-operation between migration and law enforcement authorities of Member States at the external borders and measures within the territory and the necessary flanking measures related to document security and identity management;
source: PE-496.290
|
| 3 |
2011/0367(COD) Asylum and Migration Fund; Instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management: general provisions
2012/04/10
LIBE
3 amendments...
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 a (new) (17a) It is important to ensure the right of access to documents as guaranteed by Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, 16 TEU, 15 TFEU and Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents1. 1 OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Within the limits of the available resources, the emergency assistance may amount to
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 1. Responsible Authorities shall carry out a systematic administrative control of all payment requests from the beneficiaries and shall supplement them by unannounced on-the-spot controls of the expenditure related to the final payment requests from the beneficiaries that are declared in the annual accounts in view of obtaining a sufficient level of assurance.
source: PE-494.863
|
| 4 |
2011/0368(COD) Internal Security Fund: instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management 2014-2020
2012/09/20
LIBE
4 amendments...
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point d (d) ‘organised crime’ means a punishable conduct committed
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – paragraph 2 The achievement of this objective shall be measured by the Commission against indicators such as, inter alia, the number of cross-border-joint operations and the number and quality of best practice documents and events organised.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – paragraph 2 The achievement of this objective shall be measured by the Commission against indicators such as, inter alia, the number of tools put in place and/or further upgraded to facilitate the protection of critical infrastructure by Member States in all sectors of the economy and the number of threat and risk assessments produced at the level of the Union.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – paragraph 2 a (new) Member States shall provide the Commission with the necessary information that is required for the assessment of the achievements, as measured against the indictors.
source: PE-494.833
|
| 8 |
2011/0427(COD) European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR)
2012/09/27
LIBE
8 amendments...
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably, the right to life, human dignity, prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, right to liberty and security, right to the protection of personal data, non- refoulement, non-
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Any exchange of personal data using the communication network for EUROSUR should be conducted on the basis of existing national and Union legal provisions and should respect their specific data protection requirements. The Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation shall apply to the surveillance of land and sea external borders of the Member States, including measures for monitoring, detection, identification, tracking, prevention and interception of illegal border crossings and rescuing and protecting the lives of migrants at risk.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point b (b) ‘reaction capability’ means the ability to perform actions aimed at countering illegal cross-border movements, or rescuing and protecting the lives of migrants at risk, including the means and timelines to react adequately to unusual circumstances;
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. Each incident in the events layer of the national situational picture shall be assigned with a single indicative impact level, ranging from ‘low’ and ‘medium’ to ‘high’ impact. Incidents regarding persons in distress at sea shall be assigned with a 'high' impact level. All events assigned with a ‘medium’ to ‘high’ impact level shall be shared with the Agency.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 6 – point c (c) an intelligence picture sub-layer, which shall contain migrant profiles that shall not include personal data, routes, information on the impact levels attributed to the external land and sea border sections and facilitation analysis;
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. If the Agency gains knowledge of persons in distress at sea, it shall immediately inform the neighbouring national coordination centres for the area in which the situation occurs. The Agency shall confirm the responsibility of the Member State concerned and coordinate the appropriate actions.
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Member States shall ensure that the surveillance
source: PE-496.412
|
| 1 |
2011/0454(COD) Protection of the European Union's financial interests: Hercule III programme, 2014-2020
2012/10/23
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Activities with the aim of providing better information, specialised training or technical and scientific assistance help significantly to protect the financial interests of the Union and at the same time to attain an equivalent level of protection across the Union. The allocation of resources to the several points of entry should be risk-based and allocation mechanisms should be able to quickly adjust to changing circumstances.
source: PE-498.050
|
| 1 |
2011/2019(BUD) 2012 budget: mandate for the trilogue
2011/05/24
BUDG
1 amendments...
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Observes that according to the DB 2012 there is an overall margin of EUR 1 603 million in CA under the 2012 ceiling agreed in the MFF;
source: PE-465.029
|
| 3 |
2011/2020(BUD) 2012 budget: all sections
2011/06/10
BUDG
3 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that the low level of payments proposed by Council would lead to a bigger discrepancy between PA and CA, mechanically resulting in an increase of RALs at year end, particularly in subheadings 1a and 1b; warns in this context of the already extremely large amount of accumulated RAL so close to the end of this MFF;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Decides to
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Recalls the important role regional and cohesion policies play towards the achievement of the goals of the EU 2020 strategy and economic recovery of European regions; deplores Council's restrictive approach on payments, which were cut by some EUR 1 300 million as compared to Commission's forecasts of payment needs for 2012; notes that only the convergence objective and the technical assistance lines remained untouched by the cuts of Council; reminds that these cuts apply to budget allocations that were already far below Member States' own estimates (EUR 61 billion for 2012 or some 50% above DB) and widely considered as being the bare minimum for honouring upcoming payment claims and be consistent with the speeding up of implementation at the end of the programming period; requests an assessment of the implementation of regional and cohesion policy, with concrete proposals on how to reduce RALs;
source: PE-473.841
|
| 3 |
2011/2048(INI) Modernisation of public procurement
2011/06/27
CONT
3 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to carry out the necessary analysis of rules stemming from EU case law in order to clarify the legal framework and give more legal security to all parties;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Invites the Commission to review the existing qualitative selection criteria by
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls the Commission to introduce means to simplify the procurement process and to reduce the administrative burden of bidders in order to improve the SMEs' chances to access public contracts as emphasised in the Parliament's report on Small Business Act (2008/2237(/INI)); stresses that these means will also reduce the risk of administrative errors; suggests working with a central or regional register or passport in order for SMEs to reduce the administrative burden caused by the requirements in the selection stage;
source: PE-467.294
|
| 1 |
2011/2082(INI) Future of VAT
2011/06/23
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 (new) Requests the Commission to investigate the possibilities of clearly indicating to EU-citizens which part of VAT in each commercial transaction is an EU-own resource.
source: PE-467.299
|
| 5 |
2011/2107(INI) Green Paper: From challenges to opportunities: towards a common strategic framework for EU research and innovation funding
2011/06/14
AGRI
5 amendments...
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Member States to make better use of the support for applied research and investment in innovation and modernisation beneficial to animal welfare which is available from EU rural development funds and the EU Research Framework Programmes, and calls on the Commission to ensure appropriate focus and financing on this matter in the future;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. To meet the challenge of global food security, calls on the Member States and the Commission to step up financial investments in independent biotechnical and biotechnological research;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Reiterates its call for more coordinated research to be performed on new antimicrobials as well as other alternatives (vaccination, bio security etc) and evidence based strategies to avoid and control infectious diseases in animals; underlines the importance of the EU's Research Framework Programmes in this respect; stresses in this context the importance of developing systems for animal husbandry which reduce the need for antimicrobials to be used;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that the development of sustainable, climate-friendly agriculture requires substantial research into effective pesticides that revert to non- hazardous components and do not pollute the groundwater, which should enable no- tillage agriculture;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Emphasises that the establishment of a vital lifecycle for nutrients, specifically phosphates, between town and country requires well-funded research into innovative systems to clean urban sewage sludge of pharmacological and toxic substances so that the sludge can be reused in fields as a nutrient;
source: PE-467.136
|
| 5 |
2011/2201(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission
2012/07/03
CONT
5 amendments...
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Considers that meaningful use of the term ‘shared management’ must be based on the fundamental principle that the Union delegates some of its powers to the Member States and that the Member States are obliged to carry out their part of the work in accordance with the legal acts of the Union; calls on the full implementation of point 44 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management; believes that annual summaries of the audits and declarations available, must be public so as to make a contribution towards improving management of the Union budget;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 – indent -1 a (new) – providing the Committee on Budgetary Control full insight into the Member States annual summaries; deplores the fact that the Commission until now has not given any information on the annual summaries, as without any knowledge of the content of annual summaries they cannot be regarded as national management declarations;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 – indent 2 – decreasing the level of pre-financings in the various programmes and, especially in the area of Cohesion policy funding where majority of errors and mistakes are discovered, to a level absolutely necessary for the beneficiary to start the project;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 – introductory part 59. Reiterates its invitation to the Council and Member States to give due consideration to the following requests concerning the implementation of the permanent crisis mechanism: - urges the Commission to report to Parliament and the Council twice a year on the risk that is incurred on the Union budget by its guarantee to the ESM/EFSF; asks the Commission how in case of a default this money would be transferred into the Union budget and then to the ESM/EFSF
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas there shall be adequate arrangements for transparency, public accountability and public audit where public funds are at stake, whereas for the seventeenth year in the row the Court of Auditors has not been able to issue a positive declaration of assurance on the Union Budget.
source: PE-483.775
|
| 3 |
2012/0000(INI)
2013/03/26
CONT
3 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the definition of tax havens is no longer up-to-date and that (semi-)legal ways of avoiding or reducing tax liabilities are becoming more and more common in the Member States
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Points out that ever since VAT was introduced its collection model has remained unchanged; stresses that this model is outdated, given the many changes in the technological and economic environment that have taken place, and that it therefore leads to substantial losses in terms of
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Emphasi
source: PE-506.067
|
| 34 |
2012/0010(COD) Personal data protection: processing of data for the purposes of prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or execution of criminal penalties, and free movement of data
2013/03/06
LIBE
21 amendments...
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) Personal data should not be processed for purposes incompatible with the purpose for which it was collected. Personal data should be adequate
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Every natural person should have the right not to be subject to a measure which is based
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) The principle of fair processing requires that the data subjects should be informed in a transparent manner in particular of the existence of the processing operation and its purposes, its legal ground, how long the data will be stored, on the existence of the right of access, rectification or erasure and on the right to lodge a complaint. Where the data are collected from the data subject, the data subject should also be informed whether they are obliged to provide the data and of the consequences, in cases they do not provide such data.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) Any person should have the right of access to data which has been collected concerning them, and to exercise this right easily, in order to be aware of and verify the lawfulness of the processing. Every data subject should therefore have the right, when possible in advance, to know about and obtain communication in particular of the purposes for which the data are processed, for what period, which recipients receive the data, including in third countries Data subjects should be allowed to receive a copy of their personal data which are being processed.
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) In order to ensure effective protection of the rights and freedoms of data subjects by way of preventive actions, the controller or processor should consult with the supervisory authority in certain cases prior to the processing. Where processing operations are likely to present a high degree of specific risks to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, the supervisory authority should be in a position to prevent, prior to the start of operations, a processing which is not in compliance with this Directive, and to make proposals to remedy such situation.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 42 (42) A personal data breach may, if not addressed in an adequate and timely manner, result in harm, including reputational damage to the individual concerned. Therefore, as soon as the controller becomes aware that such a breach has occurred, it should notify the breach to the competent national authority. The individuals whose personal data or privacy could be adversely affected by the breach should be notified without undue delay in order to allow them to take the necessary precautions. A breach should be considered as adversely affecting the personal data or privacy of an individual where it could result in, for example, identity theft or fraud, physical harm, significant humiliation or damage to reputation or economic or social loss in connection with the processing of personal data.
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 65 a (new) (65a) Transmission of personal data to other authorities or private parties in the Union is prohibited unless there is the prevention of an immediate and serious danger to public security, or the prevention of serious harm to the rights of individuals. The controller should inform the recipient of the purpose of the processing. The recipient should also be informed of processing restrictions and ensure that they are met.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) processed fairly and lawfully and in a transparent manner;
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) adequate, relevant, and
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Data initially processed for purposes other than those referred to in Article 1(1) may only be used for the purposes of prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences granted they are processed on a valid legal basis that ensures sufficient guarantees for the data subject.
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States shall restrict the access to the personal data to a restricted group of duly authorised personnel.
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Personal data may only be processed by personnel duly authorised by the responsible authority with the aim of the sound execution of their tasks and only as far as this authorisation extents.
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. The authorisation shall contain a sound description of the tasks and processes of the processing operation for which the personnel concerned is authorised.
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Member States sh
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall provide that measures which produce an adverse legal effect for the data subject or significantly affect them and which are based
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall provide that the controller takes all
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall provide that the information and any action taken by the controller following a request referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 are free of charge and in written form. Where requests are vexatious, in particular because of their repetitive character, or the size or volume of the request, the controller may charge a fee for providing the information or taking the action requested, or the controller may not take the action requested. In that case, the controller shall bear the burden of proving the vexatious character of the request.
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 5 5. Member States
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States may adopt legislative measures restricting, wholly or partly, the data subject's right of access to the extent that such partial or complete restriction constitutes a necessary and proportionate measure in a democratic society with due regard for the legitimate interests and fundamental rights of the person concerned:
source: PE-506.127
2013/03/08
LIBE
13 amendments...
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. Member States may determine by law categories of data processing which may wholly or partly fall under the exemptions of paragraph 1. These exemptions, however, shall not be applied in a general way but only in specific circumstances and accompanied by a reasoned justification. The controller shall be responsible for these individual, reasoned assessments.
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. In cases referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, Member States shall provide that the controller informs the data subject with undue delay in writing on any refusal or restriction of access, on the reasons for the refusal and on the possibilities of lodging a complaint to the supervisory authority and seeking a judicial remedy. The information on factual or legal reasons on which the decision is based may be omitted where the provision of such information would undermine a purpose under paragraph 1.
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall provide for the right of the data subject to obtain from the controller the erasure and abstention of further processing of personal data relating to them where the processing does not comply with the provisions adopted pursuant to Articles 4 (a) to (e), 7 and 8 of this Directive. The controller should take all reasonable steps, including technical measures, to inform third parties.
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Instead of erasure, the controller shall mark
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. The controller shall implement mechanisms for ensuring that, by default, only those personal data which are necessary for the purposes of the processing are processed as well as stored no longer then deemed necessary by the responsible investigation authority.
Amendment 510 #
Proposal for a directive Article 22 a (new) Article 22a Where the processor is or becomes the determining part in relation to the purposes, means, or methods of data processing or does not act exclusively on the instructions of the controller, it shall be considered as a joint controller pursuant to Article 20.
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that records are kept of at least the following processing operations: collection, alteration, consultation, disclosure, combination or erasure. The records of consultation and disclosure shall show in particular the purpose, date and time of such operations and
Amendment 547 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall provide that the controller and the processor implements appropriate technical and organisational measures and procedures to ensure a level of security appropriate to the risks represented by the processing and the nature of the data to be protected, having regard to the state of the art and the cost of their implementation.
Amendment 553 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall provide that the controller documents any personal data breaches, comprising the facts surrounding the breach, its effects and the remedial action taken. This documentation must enable the supervisory authority to verify compliance with this Article. The documentation shall only include the information necessary for that purpose. The supervisory authority shall keep a public record of the breaches notified.
Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission, after consultation of the European Data Protection Board, shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 56 for the purpose of specifying further the criteria and requirements for establishing the data breach referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 and for the particular circumstances in which a controller and a processor is required to notify the personal data breach.
Amendment 558 #
Proposal for a directive Article 28 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission, after consultation of the European Data Protection Authority, may lay down the standard format of such notification to the supervisory authority, the procedures applicable to the notification requirement and the form and the modalities for the documentation referred to in paragraph 4, including the time limits for erasure of the information contained therein. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 57(2).
Amendment 641 #
Proposal for a directive Article 45 – paragraph 6 6. Where requests are very vexatious, in particular due to their repetitive character, the supervisory authority may charge a fee or not take the action required by the data subject. The supervisory authority shall bear the burden of proving of the very vexatious character of the request.
Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a directive Article 47 – paragraph 1 Member States shall provide that each supervisory authority draws up an annual report on its activities. The report shall be made public and available to the Commission and the European Data Protection Board.
source: PE-506.128
|
| 49 |
2012/0011(COD) Personal data protection: processing and free movement of data (General Data Protection Regulation)
2013/03/04
LIBE
28 amendments...
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In order to ensure that individuals are not deprived of the protection to which they are entitled under this Regulation, the processing of personal data of data subjects residing in the Union by a controller not established in the Union should be subject to this Regulation where the processing activities are related to the offering of goods or (free)services to such data subjects, or to the monitoring of the behaviour of such data subjects.
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) In order to determine whether a processing activity can be considered to ‘monitor the behaviour’ of data subjects, it should be ascertained whether individuals are tracked, regardless o
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The principles of protection should apply to any information concerning an identified or identifiable person. To determine whether a person is identifiable, account should be taken of all the means likely reasonably to be used either by the controller or by any other person to identify the individual. The principles of data protection should not apply to data rendered anonymous in such a way that the data subject is no longer identifiable as for example data that has been anonymised for the purpose of medical research.
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) When using
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Consent should be given explicitly by any appropriate method enabling a freely given specific and informed indication of the data subject’s wishes, either by a statement or by a clear affirmative action by the data subject, ensuring that individuals are aware that they give their consent to the processing of personal data, including by ticking a box when visiting an Internet website or by any other statement or conduct which clearly indicates in this context the data subject
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27)
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) Consent should not as a rule provide a valid legal ground for the processing of personal data, where there is a clear imbalance between the data subject and the controller
Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 a (new) (39a) The processing of personal data for direct marketing purposes should constitute a legitimate interest, if the controller has obtained the personal data of the data subject in the context of the sale of a product or service and that the personal data are used for direct marketing of the data controllers own similar products.
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 (47) Modalities should be provided for facilitating the data subject’s exercise of their rights provided by this Regulation, including mechanisms to request, free of charge, in particular access to data, rectification, erasure and to exercise the right to object. The controller should be obliged to respond to requests of the data subject within a
Amendment 502 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) To strengthen the ‘right to be forgotten’ in the online environment, the right to erasure should also be extended in such a way that a controller who has made the personal data public should be obliged
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 55 (55) To further strengthen the control over their own data and their right of access, data subjects should have the right, where personal data are processed by electronic means and in a structured and commonly used format, to obtain a copy of the data concerning them also in commonly used electronic format. The data subject should also be allowed to transmit those data, which they have provided, from one automated application, such as a social network, into another one. Data controllers should be encouraged to develop interoperable formats that enable data portability. This should apply where the data subject provided the data to the automated processing system, based on their consent or in the performance of a contract.
Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 65 (65) Each controller and processor should be obliged to co-operate with the supervisory authority. In order to demonstrate compliance with this Regulation, the controller or processor should document
Amendment 536 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 (67) A personal data breach may, if not addressed in an adequate and timely manner, result in substantial economic loss and social harm, including identity fraud, to the individual concerned. Therefore, as soon as the controller becomes aware that such a breach has occurred, the controller should notify the breach to the supervisory authority without undue delay
Amendment 543 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 70 (70) Directive 95/46/EC provided for a general obligation to notify processing of personal data to the supervisory authorities
Amendment 560 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 75 (75) Where the processing is carried out in the public sector or where, in the private sector, processing is carried out by a large enterprise, or where its core activities, regardless of the size of the enterprise, involve processing operations which require regular and systematic monitoring, a person or a team of professionals should assist the controller or processor to monitor internal compliance with this Regulation. Such data protection officers, whether or not an employee of the controller, should be in a position to perform their duties and tasks independently. However, final responsibility should stay with the management of an organization.
Amendment 571 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) In order to enhance transparency and compliance with this Regulation, the establishment of certification mechanisms, data protection seals and standardised marks should be encouraged, allowing data subjects to quickly assess the level of data protection of relevant products and services.
Amendment 588 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 88 (88) Transfers which cannot be qualified as frequent or massive, could also be possible for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or the processor, when they have assessed all the circumstances surrounding the data transfer. For instance this would be the case if the purposes of processing
Amendment 607 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 110 (110) At Union level, a European Data Protection Board should be set up. It should replace the Working Party on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of a head of a supervisory authority of each Member State and of the European Data Protection Supervisor.
Amendment 646 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 127 a (new) (127a) The obligation to inform the data subject about the purposes of the processing, the right to erasure, the right to data portability, the right to objection, the obligation to take measures to ensure compliance as well as the prohibition to transfer data to countries outside the Union, should not apply to the processing of information relating to the professional capacity of an individual, such as such individual’s employer, job title, function, business address, business phone or fax number, business e-mail address or other organizational details. However, data subjects should have the right to request from the controller not to have such professional information disclosed to third parties.
Amendment 649 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 128 (128) This Regulation respects and does not prejudice the status under national law of churches and religious associations or communities in the Member States, as recognised in Article 17 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. As a consequence, where a church in a Member State applies, at the time of entry into force of this Regulation, comprehensive rules relating to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data, these existing rules should continue to apply if they are brought in line with this Regulation.
Amendment 768 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 9 (9) ‘personal data breach’ means a breach
Amendment 833 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) kept in a form which permits identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the personal data are processed; personal data may be stored for longer periods insofar as the data will be processed solely for historical, statistical or scientific research purposes in accordance with the rules and conditions of Article 83 and if a periodic review is carried out to assess the necessity to continue the storage as well as for dispute resolution purposes;
Amendment 844 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) processed under the responsibility and liability of the controller, who shall be able to ensure and demonstrate for
Amendment 949 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 950 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Further processing of personal data for historical, statistical and scientific purposes shall not be considered as incompatible when the data controller has provided all necessary precautions to ensure that the personal data can only be further processed for these specific purposes.
Amendment 953 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Further processing of personal data is prohibited if the processing is not compatible with any legal, professional or other binding obligation of secrecy.
Amendment 965 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 Amendment 990 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. Consent shall not as a rule provide a legal basis for the processing
source: PE-504.340
2013/03/06
LIBE
21 amendments...
Amendment 1326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller communication of the personal data undergoing processing.
Amendment 1328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. To verify the lawfulness of the processing the data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller communication of the personal data undergoing processing. Where the data subject makes the request in electronic form, the information shall be provided in electronic form, unless otherwise requested by the data subject.
Amendment 1628 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) national security;
Amendment 1653 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – title Responsibility and accountability of the controller
Amendment 1655 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 1. The controller shall adopt policies and implement appropriate measures to ensure and be able to demonstrate in a transparent manner that the processing of personal data is performed in compliance with this Regulation. Accountability will always remain with the management.
Amendment 1689 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 3. The controller shall implement mechanisms to ensure the verification of the effectiveness of the measures
Amendment 1756 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 1823 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 The processor and any person acting under the authority of the controller or of the processor who has access to personal data shall keep the personal data confidential and not process them except on instructions from the controller, unless required to do so by Union or Member State law.
Amendment 1831 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. Each controller and processor and, if any, the controller's representative, shall maintain documentation of
Amendment 1949 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 1. In the case of a personal data breach, the controller shall without undue delay and
Amendment 1966 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Controllers shall notify the supervisory authority of the Member State in which they are established. Where the notification is carried out in accordance with paragraph 4, the supervisory authority of the Member State in which the controller responsible for the personal data breach is established shall be notified. Controllers which are not established on the territory of the European Union, shall notify the supervisory authority of the Member State in which their representative is established.
Amendment 1980 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new) In case the controller is part of a group of undertakings or of joint controllers, the personal data breach may be notified by the main establishment, or by another controller or undertaking designated by the joint controllers or group of undertakings.
Amendment 2036 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 2143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 1. The controller and the processor shall designate a data protection officer or attract sufficient external advice in any case where: (a) the processing is carried out by a public authority or body; or (b) the processing is carried out by an enterprise employing 250 persons or more; or (c) the core activities of the controller or the processor consist of processing operations which, by virtue of their nature, their scope and/or their purposes, require regular and systematic monitoring of data subjects. The data protection officer can already be employed by the enterprise and fulfil his duties part time and will report to the board of an enterprise, organization or public authority which bears ultimate responsibility and is accountable.
Amendment 2159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) where risks as mentioned in Article 33(2) are not negligible even though the company's main activity is not data processing;
Amendment 2161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 2189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 2238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 9 Amendment 2261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 2. The controller or processor shall ensure that the data protection officer performs the duties and tasks independently and does not receive any instructions as regards the exercise of the function. The data protection officer shall directly report to the management of the controller or the processor which is responsible for protecting personal data in accordance with this regulation.
Amendment 2613 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The supervisory authority shall not disclose information provided to it, where such disclosure could adversely affect the rights and freedoms of others, including the controller or processor. This shall apply particularly to: (a) information related to the economic interests and trade secrets of the controller or processor; (b) the security measures taken in accordance with Article 30; and (c) information which Union or Member State law has designated as confidential.
Amendment 2879 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 79 – paragraph 3 – point b source: PE-506.168
|
| 1 |
2012/2000(BUD) 2013 budget: priorities - section III, Commission
2012/02/16
BUDG
1 amendments...
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that the level of payments, which, being the mere result of past commitments, should be determined on the basis of technical criteria such as implementation figures, absorption forecasts or the level of outstanding commitments (RAL
source: PE-480.884
|
| 3 |
2012/2016(BUD) 2013 budget: mandate for trilogue
2012/05/16
LIBE
1 amendments...
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that, in the light of its
source: PE-489.474
2012/05/31
BUDG
1 amendments...
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Understands that the Commission, at the end of the programming period, puts the accent on the side of payments, as it intends to also provide a solution to the ever more growing level of RALs;
source: PE-489.697
2012/07/05
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph C C.
source: PE-489.353
|
| 9 |
2012/2065(INI) Asbestos related occupational health threats and prospects for abolishing all existing asbestos
2012/10/18
EMPL
9 amendments...
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Urges the EU to establish action plans for owners of public buildings for the safe management and where necessary, removal of asbestos, and to provide information and guidelines to encourage private house owners to
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the EU to ma
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the EU to set up minimum requirements for mandatory asbestos- specific qualifications for civil engineers, architects and, employees of registered asbestos removal companies and to provide asbestos-specific qualifications for the training of other workers likely to be exposed to asbestos in accordance with Art 14 (1) Directive 2009/148/EC, as well as working with and supporting the social partners and other stakeholders to organise and run awareness raising activities for workers on the risks arising from asbestos and the need for appropriate training of all staff in the relevant sectors;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the
source: PE-498.022
|
| 13 |
2012/2092(BUD) 2013 general budget: all sections
2012/08/10
BUDG
13 amendments...
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the EU budget is to be seen
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that 2013 is the last year of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF), which makes it of the utmost importance to reach a balance between commitments undertaken so far and payments deriving from them that need to be honoured, the institutional credibility of the EU being at stake as well as possible legal consequences for the Commission in case of
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Deplores, therefore, the decision of the Council to proceed again this year with the usual approach of horizontal cuts to the DB, aimed at artificially reducing the level of the EU resources for 2013 all in all by EUR
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls in this context the commitment by Council to adopt an amending budget to make up for funding shortages due to its horizontal cutting procedure during the conciliation procedure for the 2012 annual EU budget; reminds that already planning for amending budgets as the annual budget procedure is being concluded does not constitute sound and responsible budgeting and hopes that this will not happen in the case of the 2013 or future EU annual budgets;.
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. On the basis of the data presented by Commission in the inter-institutional meeting on payments of 26 September 2012, doubts that the increase in payments by 6,8% proposed in the DB will be sufficient to cover reimbursements of payment claims awaited by Member States under the various headings – and in particular for Headings 1a and 1b – in the absence of an amending budget covering payment needs for 2012; will therefore
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Is of the opinion that the answer to the crisis must be more Europe and not less Europe, in order to restart investments and help rebuild confidence in the economy;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Deplores the substantial cuts in payments (-EUR 1,6 billion or -3,3 % as compared to DB) by the Council affecting the Regional Competitiveness and Employment objective (-12,9%), the European Territorial Cooperation objective (-18,7%) and the Cohesion Fund (-4,7%); thereby substantially increasing RAL, notes instead that the Convergence objective is left practically untouched;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Supports the reduction of some budget lines on refunds drastically, in some cases even to zero, as this instrument is politically controversial and has not been taken up for some products at the same level as in the budget year 2012; notes that some refund lines have been earmarked as negative priorities; weighs up carefully to what extent these lines should be reduced, in order to be able to use this instrument if needed under the current regulation;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 65 65. Considers, therefore, that any further cuts as proposed by the Council would endanger the proper functioning of the agencies and would not allow them to fulfil the tasks they have been assigned by the legislative authority; rejects Council's horizontal approach in cutting appropriations for agencies, whose needs have to be assessed on a case-by-case basis; also calls on the Commission to identify, for the next MFF period, possible areas of duplication of work or reduced added value in relation to the agencies, with a view to streamlining their functioning;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 66 66. Decides to increase the 2013 budget appropriations for the three financial supervision agencies
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 77. Welcomes the information and analyses contained in the 2011 Parliament's budgetary and financial management report and in the DGs annual activity reports, regarding budget lines that were under- implemented in 2011, and calls for further objective analysis of this type concerning the 2012 budget in order to more readily identify potential future savings possibilities to be offset by investments where needed and useful for the proper and smooth functioning of the Parliament;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraphs 77 a, b, c, d, e, f, g (new) Working arrangements of the Parliament 77a. Believes that, like every directly elected parliament, the Parliament should have the right to decide on its own seat and working place arrangements; 77b. Declares therefore that the Parliament's seat and places of work for Members and officials should be decided upon by the Parliament itself; 77c. Urges the two arms of the budgetary authority (the Council and the Parliament), in order to make financial savings and promote a more sustainable climate- and environment friendly solution, to raise the issue of a single seat and Parliament's working places for Members and officials in the upcoming negotiations on the next MFF for 2014- 2020; 77d. Urges the Member States to revise the issue of the Parliament's seat and working places in the next revision of the Treaty by amending protocol 6; 77e. Calls in the meantime on the Council and the Parliament to start elaborating a road-map towards a single seat and a more efficient use of the Parliament's working places, taking into account specific up to date figures detailing the cost of each place of work and working conditions for staff, as well as economic, societal and environmental factors - to be presented in a report by 30 June 2013; 77f. Believes that, as the most viable place for Parliament's seat would be Brussels, co-located alongside Council, Commission and the EEAS, such a road- map should also include a reasonable solution for Strasbourg and Luxemburg so as to avoid, to the extent possible, any loss of jobs and income for citizens and local and regional authorities in those places of work; such a solution could preferably entail locating other institutions permanently to Strasbourg and Luxemburg that could make full use of the Parliament's buildings; 77g. Suggests that the agreement between the authorities in Luxembourg and the Parliament, on the number of staff to be present in Luxembourg, should be revised taking into account a revision of the Parliament's needs;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 79 79. Welcomes the joint working group's proposal to
source: PE-497.798
|
| 25 |
2012/2107(DEC) Special report 6/2012 (2011 discharge): European Union Assistance to the Turkish Cypriot Community
2012/11/16
BUDG
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Supports the continuation of assistance to the Turkish Cypriot community until a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus problem, in the framework of Council Regulation (EC) 389/2006 which states that measures to be financed under this Regulation are of an exceptional and transitional nature; considers it important to budgetise support for the Turkish- Cypriot community in the next MFF (2014-2020);
source: PE-500.549
2012/12/11
CONT
24 amendments...
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas following the 2004 referenda in which the Turkish Cypriot Community has clearly expressed their desire for a future in the European Union, the Council (General Affairs and External Relations), shortly before the accession of Cyprus to the EU, requested the Commission to submit a proposal for an aid programme with particular emphasis on the economic integration of the island and on improving contacts between the two communities and within the EU and that on 7 July 2004, the Commission proposed a package of two regulations: one for a financial support instrument to encourage the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community and a ‘direct trade’ regulation; it proved, however, difficult for the Council to agree on the adoption of this package and the two regulations had to be decoupled;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas despite facing difficult political and legal circumstances and a tight timetable, the Commission developed a programme which
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on its Committee on Budgets and on the Committee on Budgetary Control to take the findings of this resolution into consideration when negotiating the new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) starting in 2014 in order to take into account the Court of Auditors' recommendation that a mechanism with a multiannual perspective in order to ensure better planning, implementation and sustainability;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls that the existing de facto division of Cyprus dates back to Turkey's military invasion of in the Northern part of the island in July 1974; this followed after years of intercommunity struggles;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges that a particular risk relates to the fact that an estimated 78 % of privately owned land in the northern part of Cyprus legally belongs to Greek Cypriots, whose consent is required for EU-funded infrastructure investments on their land;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recalls that
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Takes note that the programme has assisted a great number of different beneficiaries across the Turkish Cypriot community and some important results have already been achieved but that the construction of a seawater desalination plant, which is the programme's largest
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes that the programme has assisted many different beneficiaries across the Turkish Cypriot community; but observes nevertheless that it has not been possible to implement the single largest
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Notices that ‘more generally, the sustainability of projects is often in doubt due to the limited administrative capacity, the delayed adoption of relevant laws and regulations and the uncertainties over future spending on the part of the beneficiaries;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Agrees with the Commission, that until a settlement of the Cyprus issue is achieved, the support to the TCc
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Acknowledges that the situation described in the Court of Auditors' Special Report No 6/2012 the Commission has taken a number of initiatives and that since the audit, further efficiency improvements have been achieved; takes note of the Commission proposals in the context of the future MFF;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Regrets the loss of the seawater desalination plant project which was an unfortunate setback; recalls that this project was not only the main project in the water sector but also the largest
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Regrets the loss of the seawater desalination plant project which was an unfortunate setback; recalls that this project was not only the main project in the water sector but also the largest
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Deeply regrets that delays have affected most of the actions on local and urban infrastructures, although
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27.
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Welcomes the conclusion of the Court of Auditors that despite the difficult political context and a compressed timetable, the Commission managed to establish a programme which reflected the Regulation's objectives and to quickly set up a programme management office and introduce suitable implementing mechanisms;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Stresses the transitional and exceptional character of the EU aid to the TCc, pending the reunification of Cyprus; and, as the Commission, supports the continuation of assistance to the Turkish Cypriot community until a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus problem in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 389/2006;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29.
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30.
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Considers that EU aid should continue to support the reunification process in Cyprus;
source: PE-500.483
|
| 1 |
2012/2110(BUD) Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the shipbuilding industry in Denmark
2012/06/29
BUDG
1 amendments...
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 source: PE-492.679
|
| 4 |
2012/2265(BUD) Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the manufacturing of powered two-wheelers in Italy
2012/08/11
BUDG
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Union
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and recognition of skills and competences gained throughout the professional career; expects the training on offer in the coordinated package to be adapted not only to the
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 source: PE-500.380
|
| 5 |
2012/2275(BUD) Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the mobile phone sector in Romania
2012/08/11
BUDG
5 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Union
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. W
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and recognition of skills and competences gained throughout the professional career; expects the training on offer in the coordinated package to be adapted not only to the
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 source: PE-500.375
|
| 5 |
2012/2276(BUD) Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the mobile phone sector in Finland
2012/08/11
BUDG
5 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the key importance of adapted training and recognition of skills and competences gained throughout the professional career; underlines that it is essential that the training on offer in the coordinated package is
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF; hopes that
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Acknowledges that following requests from Parliament, the 2012 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 50 000 000 on the EGF budget line 04 05 01;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 source: PE-500.381
|
| 5 |
2012/2277(BUD) Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in mobile social services in Austria
2012/08/11
BUDG
5 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Union
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. W
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and recognition of skills and competences gained throughout the professional career; expects the training on offer in the coordinated package to be adapted not only to the
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 source: PE-500.377
|
| 4 |
2012/2278(BUD) Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in electronics manufacturing services in Denmark
2012/08/11
BUDG
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Union
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and recognition of skills and competences gained throughout the professional career; expects the training on offer in the coordinated package to be adapted not only to the
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 source: PE-500.376
|
| 4 |
2012/2279(BUD) Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the automotive industry in Sweden
2012/08/11
BUDG
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Union
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and recognition of skills and competences gained throughout the professional career; expects the training on offer in the coordinated package to be adapted not only to the
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 source: PE-500.379
|
| 4 |
2012/2280(BUD) Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in metal products manufacturing in Spain
2012/08/11
BUDG
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Union
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the importance of improving the employability of all workers by means of adapted training and recognition of skills and competences gained throughout the professional career; expects the training on offer in the coordinated package to be adapted not only to the
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be integrated
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 source: PE-500.378
|
| 13 |
2013/0000(BUD)
2013/10/01
BUDG
13 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the smooth functioning of the European Parliament shall be an equally important guiding principle;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas certain investments may have a sustainable impact on the institutional budget and should therefore be considered despite tight margins for manoeuvre;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Urges the institutions to strengthen their mutual cooperation, where possible and justified, to identify savings through pooling and sharing of resources, for instance, in information technology systems, translation, interpretation and
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Encourages the continuation of structural and organisational reforms, without sacrificing legislative excellence and the quality of working conditions, and supports organizational innovation to help improving the Parliament's efficiency and the Members' quality of working conditions in 2014 and the following years, including, but not limited to, more efficient structure of the working rhythm of the Parliament, "demand-driven" translation and interpretation services (without endangering the principle of multi- lingualism), optimal logistical solutions for Members and their assistants, further upgrading of in-house research assistance, and developing paperless Parliament and e- meetings; further notes in this context the letter of Commissioner Lewandowski to the Presidents of the European Institutions dated 7 January 2013 which once again invites institutions to reduce staffing levels in their 2014 estimates and to make all possible efforts aiming at a nominal freeze at the 2013 level of overall non-salary related expenditure;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Encourages the continuation of structural and organisational reforms to deliver greater efficiencies, without sacrificing legislative excellence and the quality of working conditions, and supports organizational innovation to help improving the Parliament's eff
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Encourages the continuation of structural and organisational reforms, without sacrificing legislative excellence and the quality of services and working conditions, and supports organizational innovation to help improving the Parliament's efficiency and the Members' quality of working conditions in 2014 and the following years, including, but not limited to, more efficient structure of the working rhythm of the Parliament, "demand-driven" translation and interpretation services (without endangering the principle of multi- lingualism), optimal logistical solutions for Members and their assistants, further upgrading of in-house research assistance, and developing paperless Parliament and e- meetings;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that the Joint Bureau and Committee on Budgets Working Group on the Parliament budget could play a useful role in this reform process, on the basis of its successful work throughout 2012 in identifying ways of economising and reflecting on possible reorganisation; notes that it has already largely achieved the objectives established for it at the end of 2011,
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes, more generally, the enhanced cooperation between the Committee on Budgets and the Bureau during the annual budget procedure; stands ready to further strengthen the cooperation between the Secretary-General, the Bureau, and the Committee on Budgets throughout the year with a view to ensuring a smooth budgetary process and effective implementation of the budget; expects the Bureau to present prudent needs-based draft estimates that take account of possible subsequent increases arising from legally binding obligations, in particular the one-off costs related to Members' transition arrangements for the 2014 European elections; calls on the Secretary General to provide information on the costs of the transition arrangements for the last 3 European Parliament elections;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes, more generally, the enhanced cooperation between the Committee on Budgets and the Bureau during the annual budget procedure; stands ready to further strengthen the cooperation between the Secretary-General, the Bureau, and the Committee on Budgets throughout the year to ensure a smooth budgetary process and effective implementation of the budget; expects the Bureau to present prudent needs-based draft estimates that take account of possible subsequent increases arising from legally binding obligations and show a detailed record of costs developments to date as they affect the three places of work ;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recalls the Parliament’s budgetary resolutions, including its most recent resolution of 23 October 2012
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises the major efforts that have been made in 2012 to communicate transparently the state of play of the KAD building to the Committee on Budgets
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recalls the plenary decision for the Council to present a roadmap by June 2013 on the multiple seats of the EP and expects both the Committees concerned, the Secretary General and the Bureau to provide members with up-to-date figures and information on the financial and environmental impact of the multiple seat arrangement; suggests the EP's own impact assessment services examine this question also with respect to the impact of the EP's presence or partial presence on the respective communities and regions and present an assessment by June 2013 in order for these findings to be considered for the next MFF;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
source: PE-502.217
|
| 1 |
2013/0087(COD) Common agricultural policy (CAP): adjustment rate to direct payments in respect of the year 2013
2013/04/30
BUDG
1 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 a (new) Article 1 shall bewithout prejudice to the Regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014- 2020 and the Inter-institutional agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on cooperation in budgetary matters and sound financial management, once that Regulation and that Inter- institutional agreement are adopted. If, as a result of the adoption of the that Regulation and that Inter-institutional agreement, it becomes necessary to correct the adjustment rate the Commission shall present a revised proposal to the European Parliament and the Council, in accordance with Article 18(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy 1 before 1 December 2013. The adjustment rate shall be revised by the budget authority in the framework of the adoption of Budget 2014 on the basis, inter alia, of the Amending letter to the Draft General Budget 2014 by which the Commission provides updated estimates of the need for market related expenditures and direct payments. __________________ 1 OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1..
source: PE-510.573
|
| 8 |
2013/2010(BUD) Guidelines for the 2014 budget: section III
2013/01/31
BUDG
4 amendments...
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that, due to the intransigent position of the Council in the negotiations, the overall level of payments set in the 2013 budget is EUR 5 billion lower than the Commission’s estimates for payment needs in the draft budget; is extremely worried about the level of payments in the 2013 budget and believes that this level of appropriations will be insufficient to cover actual payment needs in 2013; warns that continued and excessive deferral of payments on an annual basis will create significant problems for future years;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Further calls on the Commission and the Council to work constructively, together with Parliament, to avoid any repetition of this situation in future budget cycles by improving forecasting accuracy and agreeing on realistic budget estimates which should include clear and detailed information on the nature of all payment estimates;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Is concerned about the high level of unused appropriations (RALs) accumulated at the end of the year 2012; proposes to organise once again this year inter- institutional meetings on the difference between commitment and payment appropriations, to establish a dialogue with the Commission in order to fully clarify the composition of RAL and to assess whether the current peak in RAL is primarily due to the economic crisis or whether it indicates wider structural problems; in the event of the latter conclusion, calls on institutions to work together and adopt an appropriate plan of action in order to address the issue of abnormal RAL during the next MFF; insists that the Council refrain from deciding a priori the level of payments, without taking account of actual needs and legal obligations; notes further that accruing RAL actually undermines a transparent EU budget in which the relation between commitments and payments in any specific budgetary year is clearly visible;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the strategic effect of the choice of priorities for 2014, as the first year of the coming MFF; emphasises the urgent need for the EU to foster growth and competitiveness, with the objective of creating jobs and opportunities, in particular for young people;
source: PE-504.211
2013/07/02
BUDG
4 amendments...
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that, due to the intransigent position of the Council in the negotiations, the overall level of payments set in the 2013 budget is EUR 5 billion lower than the Commission’s estimates for payment needs in the draft budget; is extremely worried about the level of payments in the 2013 budget and believes that this level of appropriations will be insufficient to cover actual payment needs in 2013; warns that continued and excessive deferral of payments on an annual basis will create significant problems for future years;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Further calls on the Commission and the Council to work constructively, together with Parliament, to avoid any repetition of this situation in future budget cycles by improving forecasting accuracy and agreeing on realistic budget estimates which should include clear and detailed information on the nature of all payment estimates;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Is concerned about the high level of unused appropriations (RALs) accumulated at the end of the year 2012; proposes to organise once again this year inter- institutional meetings on the difference between commitment and payment appropriations, to establish a dialogue with the Commission in order to fully clarify the composition of RAL and to assess whether the current peak in RAL is primarily due to the economic crisis or whether it indicates wider structural problems; in the event of the latter conclusion, calls on institutions to work together and adopt an appropriate plan of action in order to address the issue of abnormal RAL during the next MFF; insists that the Council refrain from deciding a priori the level of payments, without taking account of actual needs and legal obligations; notes further that accruing RAL actually undermines a transparent EU budget in which the relation between commitments and payments in any specific budgetary year is clearly visible;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Highlights the strategic effect of the choice of priorities for 2014, as the first year of the coming MFF; emphasises the urgent need for the EU to foster growth and competitiveness, with the objective of creating jobs and opportunities, in particular for young people;
source: PE-504.211
|
| 2 |
2013/2017(BUD) 2014 budget: mandate for trilogue
2013/05/30
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph D D. whereas the collection of value added tax (VAT) and customs duties directly affects both the economies of the Member States and the Union budget and should be included in Member States management declarations;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Is worried by the Court of Auditors' finding that more than 60% of errors in spending structural funds in 2011 should have been detected by the Member States' management and control systems; calls in this respect on the Member States to strengthen their management and control systems; urges Member States to issue National Management Declarations signed at the appropriate political level covering all spending under shared management;
source: PE-513.084
|
| 6 |
2013/2018(BUD) 2014 budget: estimates of revenue and expenditure - Section I, Parliament
2013/03/12
BUDG
6 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the level of the preliminary draft estimates for the 2014 budget, as suggested by the Secretary-General in his report to the Bureau, amounts to EUR 1 813 144 206; notes with concern the rate of increase of 3,58 %compared with the 2013 budget; notes that this proposed increase has to be seen in the context of its constitutive elements, specifically an increase of 2,20 % stemming from the election of a new Parliament and the application of the Statutes for Members and Members' assistants, and an increase of 1,30 % deriving from other legal obligations; welcomes the Secretary- General's plans to investigate structural reforms in Parliament's budget and expects this work to present options for savings in the 2014 budget by September 2013, without jeopardising legislative excellence or the quality of working conditions;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the financial implications of the European elections and the turnover of Members and their assistants during the changeover between the legislative terms are of an exceptional nature
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Appreciates the fact that all other expenditure is reduced in total by 0,15 %, according to preliminary draft estimates, compared with the 2013 budget;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the efforts made by the Bureau to present realistic preliminary draft estimates; appreciates that the rate of increase in the 2014 budget, as proposed by preliminary draft estimates, is particularly low when compared with the corresponding period under the previous MFF (2007-2013) when the rate was lower only in the 2012 and 2013 financial years;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Welcomes the proposed decreases compared with the 2013 budget in the areas of translation (-56%) and interpreting costs (-23%), without endangering the principle of multilingualism, lease payments (-60%), web TV (-38%) and fitting-out of premises (-31%) and asks for detailed information proving the feasibility of these proposed cuts;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Considers that the Joint Bureau and Committee on Budgets Working Group on the Parliament budget could, on the basis of work it began in 2012, continue to play a
source: PE-506.334
|
Jan MULDER on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
Term 6 20.07.2004 - 13.07.2009
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| RSS | deleted |
|
|