Morten MESSERSCHMIDT
Constituencies
-
Denmark
Dansk Folkeparti
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Groups
-
EFD
Vice-Chair/Member of the Bureau
Europe of freedom and democracy Group
2012/01/27 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vice-Chair of | Committee on Constitutional Affairs | 2012/01/25 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Legal Affairs | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2012/03/14 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Israel | 2012/03/14 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2012/03/29 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Israel | 2009/09/16 | 2012/03/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2009/09/16 | 2012/03/13 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://www.danskfolkeparti.eu
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45738
- Fax
- +322 28 49738
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 04F259
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75738
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79738
- Office
- Bât. Winston Churchill M03112
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2013/0802(CNS) | Elections to the European Parliament in 2014 |
| Shadow | 2012/2309(INI) | Composition of the European Parliament with a view to the 2014 elections |
| Shadow | 2012/2308(INI) | Location of the seats of the European Union's institutions |
| Shadow | 2012/2156(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 191: committee bureau; interpretation |
| Shadow | 2012/2080(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 181 and 182: verbatim reports; audiovisual record of proceedings |
| Shadow | 2012/2078(INI) | Constitutional problems of a multitier governance in the European Union |
| Shadow | 2012/2069(ACI) | Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament and the Council concerning the forwarding to and handling by the European Parliament of classified information held by the Council on matters other than those in the area of the Common Foreign and Security Policy |
| Shadow | 2012/2034(INI) | Relations between the European Parliament and the institutions representing the national governments |
| Shadow | 2012/2024(INI) | Law of Administrative procedure of the European Union |
| Shadow | 2012/2020(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 15(2): order of precedence of Vice-Presidents elected by acclamation |
| Shadow | 2012/0237(COD) | European political parties and European political foundations: statute and funding |
| Shadow | 2011/2314(ACI) | Publications Office of the EU: organisation and operation; alignment with the Treaty of Lisbon |
| Shadow | 2011/2302(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure: implementing the European Citizens’ Initiative |
| Shadow | 2011/2298(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 70: interinstitutional negotiations in legislative procedures |
| Opinion | 2011/2275(INI) | 28th annual report on monitoring the application of EU Law (2010) |
| Shadow | 2011/2266(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure: changes in Parliament’s relationship with the European Council and the Eurogroup following entry in force of the Lisbon Treaty |
| Shadow | 2011/2257(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 196: provisions concerning plenary sittings applicable in committee |
| Shadow | 2011/2174(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure: code of conduct for Members in respect of financial interests and conflicts of interest (amend.) |
| Shadow | 2011/2168(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 48(2): own-initiative reports |
| Shadow | 2011/2166(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 51: procedures with joint committee meetings with regard to international agreements in the field of international trade, interpretation |
| Shadow | 2011/2165(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 192: participation of non-attached Members in meetings of parliamentary committee coordinators, interpretation |
| Shadow | 2011/2152(ACI) | Interinstitutional Agreement on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management 2014-2020 (replacing Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006) |
| Shadow | 2011/2090(INI) | Unilateral statements in the minutes of the Council |
| Shadow | 2011/2059(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 128: exercise of Parliament's rights vis-à-vis the Court of Justice, interpretation |
| Opinion | 2011/2029(INI) | Better legislation, subsidiarity and proportionality and smart regulation |
| Opinion | 2011/0901(COD) | Court of Justice: statute (amend. Protocol and Annex I) |
| Shadow | 2011/0818(NLE) | Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to the Czech Republic. Protocol (amend.). Consent to not to convene a Convention |
| Shadow | 2011/0817(NLE) | Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to the Czech Republic. Protocol (amend.) |
| Shadow | 2011/0816(NLE) | Treaty of Lisbon: concerns of the Irish people in the areas of right to life, family, education, taxation and military neutrality. Protocol. Consent to not to convene a Convention |
| Shadow | 2011/0815(NLE) | Treaty of Lisbon: concerns of the Irish people in the areas of right to life, family, education, taxation and military neutrality. Protocol |
| Shadow | 2010/2292(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 9 and Annexes: establishment of a joint Transparency Register between the Parliament and the Commission |
| Shadow | 2010/2291(ACI) | European Parliament/European Commission Agreement: transparency register for organisations and self-employed individuals engaged in EU policy-making and policy implementation |
| Shadow | 2010/2231(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rules 106 and 192 and Annex XVII: hearings of Commissioners-designate |
| Shadow | 2010/2201(INI) | Application of Regulation 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding |
| Shadow | 2010/2061(REG) | EP Rules of Procedures, Rule 51: joint committee meetings |
| Shadow | 2010/2042(ACI) | Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on cooperation in budgetary matters 2007-2013 |
| Shadow | 2010/0821(NLE) | Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU): stability mechanism for Member States whose currency is the euro (amend. Article 136 TFEU) |
| Shadow | 2010/0074(COD) | Citizens' initiative |
| Shadow | 2009/2212(INI) | Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament on the detailed provisions governing the exercise of the European Parliament's right of inquiry replacing the Decision of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 19 April 1995 (95/167/EC, Euratom, ECSC) |
| Shadow | 2009/2195(REG) | EP Rules of Procedure, Rules 87a and 88: delegated acts and implementing measures |
| Shadow | 2009/2134(INI) | Proposal for a modification of the Act concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage of 20 September 1976 |
| Shadow | 2006/0277(CNS) | European elections: exercise of the right to vote and stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament, preventing citizens from voting or standing twice |
Born
1980/11/13 Frederikssund- Degree in Law from the University of Copenhagen.
- Member of the Danish Parliament (2005-2009).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 5 |
0000/2013(INI)
2013/05/08
AFCO
5 amendments...
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 source: PE-510.728
|
| 2 |
2009/2134(INI) Proposal for a modification of the Act concerning the election of the Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage of 20 September 1976
2011/10/11
AFCO
2 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital V Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 source: PE-475.840
|
| 3 |
2009/2142(INI) Better lawmaking - 15th annual report from the Commission pursuant to Article 9 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality
2010/04/13
AFCO
3 amendments...
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that any communication from one or more national parliaments on problems with the subsidiarity principle should be taken seriously, and calls in this connection for a dialogue to be initiated in every such case between the relevant European Parliament committee and the national parliament(s);
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that there should be no material restrictions on what proposals may be submitted by citizens through the Citizens’ Initiative and are thus admissible by the EU institutions;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the vital importance of making simple, clear laws that EU citizens can understand
source: PE-439.979
|
| 13 |
2009/2241(INI) Institutional aspects of accession by the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
2010/03/25
AFCO
13 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas, in case law which has remained consistent since the 1970s, the Court of Justice has held that fundamental rights form an integral part of the general legal principles
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Court of Justice devotes particular attention to the development of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, as demonstrated by the growing number of judgments which refer to provisions of the ECHR, and need not itself develop this case law,
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union provides that the European Union shall accede to the ECHR and whereas Protocol No 8 to the Lisbon Treaty lists a series of points concerning which provision must be made
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 1 – the incorporation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights into its primary law, its accession to the ECHR will send a strong signal concerning the coherence between the Union and
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Observes that the ECHR system has been supplemented by a series of additional protocols concerning the protection of rights which are not covered by the ECHR and suggests that the Union should accede to all the protocols which
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 3 – the right for the European Parliament to appoint/send a certain number of representatives, which should at least include participants from all groups of the European Parliament, to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe when the latter elects judges to the European Court of Human Rights;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that any application by a citizen of the Union concerning an act or failure to act by an institution or body of the Union should be directed solely against the latter and that similarly any application concerning a measure by means of which a Member State implements the law of the Union should be directed solely against the Member State, without prejudice to the principle that,
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 source: PE-440.010
|
| 10 |
2010/0074(COD) Citizens' initiative
2010/11/16
AFCO
10 amendments...
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) It is necessary to establish the minimum number of Member States from which citizens must come. In order to ensure that a citizens' initiative is representative of a Union interest, this number should be set at
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point 1 1. "Citizens" initiative" means an initiative, submitted to the Commission in accordance with the present Regulation, inviting the Commission, within the framework of its powers, to submit any appropriate proposal on matters where citizens consider that a legal act of the Union is required for the purpose of implementing the Treaties, which has received the support of at least one million eligible signatories coming from at least
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. If the Commission rejects a proposal for a citizen’s initiative, the organisers shall have an opportunity to submit the initiative to the European Parliament’s AFCO Committee, which will then discuss the content of the initiative and the Commission’s rejection.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The signatories of a citizens' initiative shall come from at least
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. In
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. Signatories shall be considered as coming from the Member State wh
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) aa. receive the organisers at an appropriate level to allow them to explain in detail the matters raised by the initiative and organise a public hearing on the subject-matter of the initiative, if appropriate jointly with other institutions or bodies of the EU;
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b b. examine the citizens' initiative and
source: PE-452.836
|
| 19 |
2010/0816(NLE) European External Action Service EEAS: organisation and functioning
2010/06/28
AFCO
19 amendments...
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 (1) The purpose of this Decision is to establish the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service ("EEAS"), a functionally autonomous body of the Union under the authority of the High Representative, set up by Article 27(3) of the Treaty on European Union ("TEU"), as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon. This Decision and in particular the reference to the term "High Representative" will be interpreted in accordance with his/her different functions under Article 18 of the TEU.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 (3) The EEAS will support the High Representative, who is also a Vice- President of the Commission and the President of the Foreign Affairs Council, in fulfilling his/her mandate to conduct the Common Foreign and Security Policy ("CFSP") of the European Union and to ensure the consistency of the EU's external action as outlined, notably, in Articles 18 and 27 TEU. The EEAS will support the High Representative in his/her capacity as President of the Foreign Affairs Council, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the General Secretariat of the Council. The EEAS will also support the High Representative in his/her capacity as Vice- President of the Commission, for his/her responsibilities within the Commission for responsibilities incumbent on it in external relations and for coordinating other aspects of the Union's external action, without prejudice to the normal tasks of the Commission services.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 a (new) (3a) In its contribution to the EU external cooperation programmes, the EEAS ensures that these programmes respond to the objectives for external action as set out in Article 21 TEU.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 (7) Provisions should be adopted relating to the staff of the EEAS and their recruitment
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 a (new) (7a) The staff members of the EEAS will carry out their duties and conduct themselves solely with in mind the full respect of the identified strategic interests by the European Council as well as the determined objectives and defined guidelines for the common foreign and security policy, that shall be put into effect by the High Representative and by the Member States, using national and Union resources according to article 26 TEU.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 b (new) (7b) In accordance with Article 27(3) of the TEU, the EEAS will comprise officials from the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission as well as personnel coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States. For that purpose, the relevant departments and functions in the General Secretariat of the Council and in the Commission will be transferred to the EEAS, together with officials and temporary agents occupying a post in such departments or functions. Before the 1st of July 2013, the EEAS will recruit exclusively officials originating from the General Secretariat of the Council and the Commission as well as staff seconded from the diplomatic services of the Member States. After that date, and according to the needs, the recruitment of EU permanent officials under Staff Regulation within the quota of 60% should be done accordingly with EPSO external procedure specifically designed for the EEAS.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 8 (8)
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording 1. The EEAS shall support the High Representative in fulfilling his/her mandates as outlined in Title V TEU, notably in Articles 18 and 27 TEU:
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 - in fulfilling his/her mandate to conduct the Common Foreign and Security Policy ("CFSP") of the European Union, including the Common Security and Defence Policy ("CSDP"), to contribute by his/her proposals to the development of that policy, which he/she shall carry out as mandated by the Council and to ensure the consistency of the EU's external action;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The EEAS shall be managed by an executive Secretary-General who will operate under the authority of the High Representative. The executive Secretary- General shall take all measures necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the EEAS, including its administrative and budgetary management. He shall ensure effective coordination between all departments in the central administration as well as with the Union delegations
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – indent 3 - the crisis management and planning directorate, the civilian planning and conduct capability, the European Union Military Staff and the European Union Situation Centre, placed under the direct authority and responsibility of the High Representative
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a decision Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 In areas where the Commission exercises the powers conferred to it by the Treaties, the Commission may, in accordance with article 220 (2) TFEU, also issue instructions to delegations, which shall be executed under the overall responsibility of the Head of Delegation.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The staff members of the EEAS shall carry out their duties and conduct themselves
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. When the EEAS has reached its full capacity, staff from Member States, as referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, should represent 40 % of all EEAS staff at AD level. Likewise, permanent EU officials should represent 60% of all EEAS staff at AD level, including staff coming from the diplomatic services of the Member States, who have become permanent EU officials, in accordance with the provisions of the Staff Regulations. Each year, the High Representative shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the occupation of posts in the EEAS.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. The High Representative shall lay down the rules on mobility so as to ensure that the members of the staff of the EEAS are subject to a high degree of mobility within the EEAS services. Specific modalities shall apply to the personnel referred to in Article 4 (3), third indent. In principle, all EEAS staff shall periodically serve in Union delegations. The High Representative shall establish rules to that effect.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a decision Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Actions undertaken under the CFSP budget, the Instrument for Stability except the part referred to in the seventh indent of paragraph 2, the Instrument for Cooperation with Industrialised Countries, the Communication and Public Diplomacy as well as the Election Observation Missions are under the responsibility of the High Representative/EEAS. The Commission shall be responsible for their financial implementation under the authority of the High Representative in his/her capacity as Vice-President of the Commission. The Commission will make a declaration to the effect that the High Representative will have the necessary authority in this area, in full respect of the Financial Regulation. The Commission department responsible for this implementation shall be co-located with the EEAS.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a decision Annex – paragraph 2 – introductory wording (new) In addition to the Council above mentioned staff, Commission staff in the departments and functions listed below can be transferred under the High Representative authority to the EEAS, within the limit of 60% set in Article 6 (9a).
source: PE-443.160
|
| 1 |
2010/2231(REG) EP Rules of Procedure, Rules 106 and 192 and Annex XVII: hearings of Commissioners-designate
2010/12/17
AFCO
1 amendments...
Amendment 17 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Annex XVII – paragraph 1 – point b – subparagraph 5 source: PE-454.707
|
| 2 |
2010/2291(ACI) European Parliament/European Commission Agreement: transparency register for organisations and self-employed individuals engaged in EU policy-making and policy implementation
2011/01/04
AFCO
2 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 6 – point b (b) the scope of the register, which covers all relevant actors
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 6 – point c (c) the division of the register into separate sections and subsections, which makes it possible for
source: PE-462.714
|
| 4 |
2011/0815(NLE) Treaty of Lisbon: concerns of the Irish people in the areas of right to life, family, education, taxation and military neutrality. Protocol
2012/06/03
AFCO
4 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, when Article 1 of the draft protocol
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Article 2 of the draft protocol
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas it is the Member States that negotiate and adopt Treaty amendments, and whereas it is therefore necessary to respect the previous political understandings between governments, and whereas the content of the draft protocol is not incompatible with the provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas nothing in the Treaty of Lisbon, whether it relates to the Court of Justice, the Commission or other EU institutions, may be interpreted as being contradictory to the letter or spirit of the adopted protocol;
source: PE-483.828
|
| 1 |
2011/0816(NLE) Treaty of Lisbon: concerns of the Irish people in the areas of right to life, family, education, taxation and military neutrality. Protocol. Consent to not to convene a Convention
2012/06/03
AFCO
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft report Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas all the EU institutions are obliged, in their interpretation of the application of both primary and secondary law, to comply with the decision of the European Council of 19 June 2009;
source: PE-483.833
|
| 10 |
2011/0817(NLE) Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to the Czech Republic. Protocol (amend.)
2012/04/01
AFCO
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas it is necessary to respect the conditions under which Member States have acceded to the Treaty of Lisbon,
source: PE-478.545
2012/06/14
AFCO
9 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. the Protocols to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union form an integral part thereof,
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. it should be emphasised that, pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) TEU, the Charter does not extend in any way the competences of the Union as defined in the Treaties,
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. an important function of the Charter is to increase the prominence of fundamental rights and to make them more visible,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q.
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the European Council to decide
source: PE-491.310
|
| 5 |
2011/0901(COD) Court of Justice: statute (amend. Protocol and Annex I)
2011/11/11
AFCO
4 amendments...
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) In cases of major importance before the Court of Justice, namely cases concerning fundamental questions pertaining to the legal order of the European Union, there should be the possibility for a Judge to announce, during the Court's deliberations, that he intends to deliver a dissenting opinion as to the judgment or the reasons on which it is based, to be published together with the judgment. This possibility, which exists in numerous constitutional courts of Member States of the European Union and in the European Court of Human Rights, ensures that the public is aware of the fact that there is not a sole answer to the question before the Court and that legally sound alternatives are conceivable, and may thus have an influence on future judicial practice. It contributes, moreover, to a better understanding and, in a legal system which is largely based on case-law such as that of the European Union, to a better interpretation and application of the Court's findings. Dissenting opinions must be utilised in a way that ensures the necessary authority of the Court and does not compromise the secrecy of deliberations. They must be the sole initiative and responsibility of the Judge concerned. At the same time, they enable the majority to give the reasons for their decision in a clear and straightforward manner. Experience has shown that they do not undermine the reputation of those courts in which they are delivered, as the modalities of their delivery are entirely a matter for the court concerned.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) In order to avoid any doubts as to the authority of the temporary Judges, it is of the utmost importance that they be elected in a way which does not compromise the authority of the Court and which ensures their total independence,
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new) 4a. The following paragraph shall be added to Article 35: ‘In cases concerning fundamental questions pertaining to the legal order of the European Union, where a Judge has declared, in the deliberations of the Court of Justice, his disagreement with the judgment to be delivered or the reasons on which that judgment is based, he shall be entitled to deliver a dissenting opinion. That opinion shall be published together with the judgment. Implementing rules relating to the admissibility, and the detailed procedure for the delivery, of such opinions shall be laid down in the Rules of Procedure.’.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 The Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with Article 257 TFEU, may attach temporary Judges to the specialised courts in order to cover the absence of Judges who, while not suffering from disablement deemed to be total, are prevented from participating in judicial business for an extended period of time. In that event, the Parliament and the Council shall lay down the conditions under which the temporary Judges shall be appointed, their rights and duties, the detailed rules governing the performance of their duties and the circumstances in which they shall cease to perform those duties.
source: PE-475.880
2012/02/02
AFCO
1 amendments...
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 b (new) (10b) Whilst there is a need for the Court of Justice to introduce a mechanism allowing dissenting opinions to be expressed, this must not jeopardise the independence of Judges; a thorough debate on this issue is needed between experts, practitioners and other interested parties.
source: PE-480.658
|
| 7 |
2011/2019(BUD) 2012 budget: mandate for the trilogue
2011/04/05
AFCO
7 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas a proper communication policy should be based on relevant information to be given to citizens,
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital C Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Regrets that the Court of Auditors was again unable to give an unqualified statement of assurance on the EU budget in its latest audit and impresses on all the institutions that this situation is untenable;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Declares that, at a time of crisis when Member States are making drastic budget cuts, all EU institutions should display solidarity and not increase their expenditure;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3c (new) 3c. Is sceptical about the Commission’s imminent plans to introduce EU taxes;
source: PE-464.801
|
| 2 |
2011/2174(REG) EP Rules of Procedure: code of conduct for Members in respect of financial interests and conflicts of interest (amend.)
2011/07/11
AFCO
2 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
A. whereas it should be emphasised that the objective of the new code of conduct is to combat all forms of corruption. Consequently all substantiated allegations of corruption should lead to suspension of parliamentary immunity and criminal investigation at the relevant courts rather than an administrative procedure initiated by the Advisory Committee. This is not only to ensure that culprits are convicted in accordance with laws against corruption, but also to ensure that the fundamental rights of a fair trial guaranteed under the provisions of Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights are observed,
Amendment 17 #
Parliament's Rules of Procedure Motion for a decision Recital B (new) B. whereas the suspension of parliamentary immunity is always decided upon by request from national authorities, it is stressed that any decision on such matter by the Advisory Committee shall be communicated to the relevant national authorities,
source: PE-475.805
|
| 4 |
2012/0366(COD) Tobacco and related products: manufacture, presentation and sale. Approximation of Member States legislation
2013/05/14
ENVI
4 amendments...
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) Council Directive 89/622/EEC of 13 November 1989 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the labelling of tobacco products and the prohibition of the marketing of certain types of tobacco for oral use prohibited the sale in the Member States of certain types of tobacco for oral use. Directive 2001/37/EC confirmed this prohibition. Article 151 of the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden grants the Kingdom of Sweden derogation from this prohibition
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1017 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 source: PE-510.712
|
| 3 |
2012/2024(INI) Law of Administrative procedure of the European Union
2012/09/19
AFCO
3 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – Recital B B. whereas all the actions of the Union must comply with the principles of the rule of law and the separation of powers;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – Recital C C. whereas Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union recognises the right to good administration as a fundamental right
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Section 2 – paragraph 2 2. The Regulation should establish a guarantee and lay down more detailed procedural rules in order to ensure respect of the fundamental principles of separation of powers, good administration, namely lawfulness and legal certainty, proportionality, impartiality and fairness, legitimate expectations and equality;
source: PE-496.436
|
| 2 |
2013/2017(BUD) 2014 budget: mandate for trilogue
2013/05/08
AFCO
2 amendments...
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Asks
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
source: PE-510.653
|
Morten MESSERSCHMIDT on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |


