Jutta HAUG
Constituencies
-
Germany
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
Germany
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Germany
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Germany
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
Germany
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
Germany
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
-
Germany
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
Groups
-
S&D
Member
Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
-
PSE
Member
Socialist Group in the European Parliament
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
PSE
Member
Group of the Party of European Socialists
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
PSE
Member
Group of the Party of European Socialists
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
-
PSE
Member
Group of the Party of European Socialists
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
-
PSE
Member
Group of the Party of European Socialists
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
PSE
Member
Socialist Group in the European Parliament
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
EP staff
Show earlier staff positions...
- Member of Conference of Committee Chairs 2010/07/08 - 2011/06/30
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vice-Chair of | Committee on Budgets | 2012/01/25 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Member of | Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 2002/02/06 | 2004/07/19 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway | 1999/10/06 | 2000/10/25 |
| Member of | Delegation to the European Economic Area Joint Parliamentary Committee (EEA) | 1997/01/16 | 1999/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand | 1999/02/24 | 1999/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand | 1997/10/14 | 1999/02/23 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand | 1997/01/16 | 1997/10/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, South-east Asia and the Republic of Korea | 1995/07/12 | 1997/01/15 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, South-east Asia and the Republic of Korea | 1994/11/17 | 1995/07/11 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, South-east Asia and the Republic of Korea | 1994/11/17 | 1995/07/11 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, South-east Asia and the Republic of Korea | 1995/07/12 | 1997/01/15 |
| Member of | Delegation to the European Economic Area Joint Parliamentary Committee (EEA) | 1997/01/16 | 1999/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand | 1997/01/16 | 1997/10/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand | 1997/10/14 | 1999/02/23 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand | 1999/02/24 | 1999/07/19 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway | 1999/10/06 | 2000/10/25 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 2002/02/06 | 2004/07/19 |
| Member of | Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://www.jutta-haug.de
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45595
- Fax
- +322 28 49595
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 12G254
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75595
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79595
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T07011
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Europäisches Parlament
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 12G254
- B-1047 Brüssel
Rapporteur
| Opinion | 2013/2053(INI) | Opinion on the evaluation report regarding BEREC and the Office |
| Opinion | 2013/0092(COD) | European Maritime Safety Agency: response to pollution caused by ships and to marine pollution caused by oil and gas installations, multiannual funding 2014-2020 |
| Opinion | 2013/0091(COD) | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and Training (Europol) |
| Opinion | 2013/0022(COD) | European GNSS Agency: independence and powers of the Security Accreditation Board and its chairperson |
| Opinion | 2013/0014(COD) | European Union Agency for Railways. 4th Railway Package |
| Opinion | 2012/2214(DEC) | 2011 discharge: performance, financial management and control of EU agencies |
| Opinion | 2012/2203(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) |
| Opinion | 2012/2196(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) |
| Opinion | 2012/2195(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
| Opinion | 2012/2190(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Medicines Agency (EMA) |
| Opinion | 2012/2187(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Environment Agency (EEA) |
| Opinion | 2012/2167(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2012/2092(BUD) | 2013 general budget: all sections |
| Opinion | 2012/0244(COD) | European Banking Authority (EBA): adjustment of procedural modalities |
| Opinion | 2012/0150(COD) | Credit institutions and investment firms: framework for recovery and resolution |
| Opinion | 2011/2235(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) |
| Opinion | 2011/2227(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
| Opinion | 2011/2226(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) |
| Opinion | 2011/2220(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Medicines Agency (EMA) |
| Opinion | 2011/2217(DEC) | 2010 discharge: European Environment Agency (EEA) |
| Opinion | 2011/2201(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2011/2020(BUD) | 2012 budget: all sections |
| Responsible | 2011/0428(COD) | Programme for the Environment and Climate Action, LIFE 2014-2020 |
| Opinion | 2010/2185(DEC) | 2009 discharge: European Chemicals Agency ECHA |
| Opinion | 2010/2179(DEC) | 2009 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control ECDC |
| Opinion | 2010/2178(DEC) | 2009 discharge: European Food Safety Authority EFSA |
| Opinion | 2010/2173(DEC) | 2009 discharge: European Medicines Agency EMEA |
| Opinion | 2010/2170(DEC) | 2009 discharge: European Environment Agency EEA |
| Opinion | 2010/2142(DEC) | 2009 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2010/0303(COD) | European Maritime Safety Agency: further development |
| Opinion | 2010/0275(COD) | European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA): further development |
| Responsible | 2009/2185(BUD) | Amending budget 10/2009: increase in the forecast of revenue; decrease in payment appropriations; European Economic Recovery Plan |
| Opinion | 2009/2131(DEC) | 2008 discharge: European Chemicals Agency ECHA |
| Opinion | 2009/2124(DEC) | 2008 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control ECDC |
| Opinion | 2009/2123(DEC) | 2008 discharge: European Food Safety Authority EFSA |
| Opinion | 2009/2118(DEC) | 2008 discharge: European Medicines Agency EMEA |
| Opinion | 2009/2115(DEC) | 2008 discharge: European Environment Agency EEA |
| Responsible | 2009/2087(BUD) | Amending budget 9/2009: mobilisation of the EU Solidary Fund for Italy |
| Opinion | 2009/2068(DEC) | 2008 discharge: EU general budget, section III, Commission |
| Responsible | 2009/2050(BUD) | Amending budget 8/2009: bluetongue, High Flux Reactor, Europol, Eurojust, OLAF |
| Responsible | 2009/2047(BUD) | Amending budget 6/2009: revision of forecasts of TOR, VAT and GNI bases; 2005 and 2008 UK corrections; financing of the gross reductions in GNI payments of Sweden and the Netherlands in 2009 |
| Responsible | 2009/2046(BUD) | Amending budget 7/2009: mobilisation of the EU Solidary Fund for France |
| Responsible | 2009/2040(BUD) | Amending budget 5/2009: budgeting the surplus from the implementation of the budget year 2008 |
| Responsible | 2009/2039(BUD) | Amending budget 4/2009: energy projects to aid economic recovery; broadband internet infrastructure in rural areas and CAP Health Check |
| Responsible | 2009/2017(BUD) | Amending budget 3/2009: financial impact from the implementation of the Own Resources Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom |
| Responsible | 2009/2010(BUD) | Amending budget 2/2009: SESAR Joint Undertaking; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control ECDC; European Railway Agency ERA; GMES operational services; Food Facility |
| Responsible | 2009/2008(BUD) | Amending budget 1/2009: mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund for Romania, financing |
| Opinion | 2009/2002(BUD) | 2010 budget: section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2009/0144(COD) | European Securities and Markets Authority ESMA: establishment (amend. Decision No 716/2009/EC) |
| Opinion | 2009/0143(COD) | European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority EIOPA: establisment (amend. Decision No 716/2009/EC) |
| Opinion | 2009/0142(COD) | European Banking Authority EBA: establishment (amend. Decision No 716/2009/EC) |
| Opinion | 2009/0089(COD) | Area of freedom, security and justice: Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems |
| Opinion | 2009/0047(COD) | Setting up the European GNSS Agency (repeal. Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004; amend. Regulation (EC) No 683/2008) |
| Opinion | 2009/0027(COD) | Establishing a European Asylum Support Office |
| Opinion | 2008/2207(INI) | Financial management and control of European agencies |
| Opinion | 2008/2103(INI) | Report on a strategy for the future settlement of the institutional aspects of Regulatory Agencies |
| Responsible | 2008/2026(BUD) | 2009 budget: Section III, Commission |
| Responsible | 2008/2025(BUD) | 2009 budget: first reflections on the 2009 PDB mandate for the conciliation |
| Responsible | 2008/2024(BUD) | 2009 budget: Section III, Commission: budgetary framework and priorities for 2009 |
| Opinion | 2007/2060(DEC) | 2006 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control ECDC |
| Opinion | 2007/2059(DEC) | 2006 discharge: European Food Safety Authority EFSA |
| Opinion | 2007/2054(DEC) | 2006 discharge: European Medicines Agency EMEA |
| Opinion | 2007/2051(DEC) | 2006 discharge: European Environment Agency EEA |
| Opinion | 2007/2037(DEC) | 2006 discharge: EC general budget, Section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2007/2019(BUD) | 2008 budget: section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2007/0249(COD) | Creation of the European Electronic Communications Market Authority ('Telecoms Package') |
| Opinion | 2007/0211(CNS) | Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking |
| Opinion | 2007/0197(COD) | Electricity and gas market: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators. Third Energy Package |
| Opinion | 2007/0122(CNS) | Research and technological development: setting up the ENIAC Joint Undertaking, nanoelectronics |
| Opinion | 2007/0118(CNS) | Research and aeronautics: setting up the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking |
| Opinion | 2007/0089(CNS) | Establishment of the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking |
| Opinion | 2007/0088(CNS) | Establishment of the "ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking" to implement a Joint Technology Initiative in Embedded Computing Systems |
| Opinion | 2007/0043(CNS) | Euratom Supply Agency: statutes |
| Opinion | 2006/2167(DEC) | 2005 discharge: European Centre for Disease prevention and control ECDC |
| Opinion | 2006/2166(DEC) | 2005 discharge: European Food Safety Authority |
| Opinion | 2006/2161(DEC) | 2005 discharge: European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products |
| Opinion | 2006/2158(DEC) | 2005 discharge: European Environment Agency |
| Opinion | 2006/2070(DEC) | 2005 discharge: EC general budget, section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2006/0310(CNS) | EUROPOL: establishing the European Police Office |
| Opinion | 2005/2119(DEC) | 2004 discharge: European Food Safety Authority |
| Opinion | 2005/2114(DEC) | 2004 discharge: European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products |
| Opinion | 2005/2111(DEC) | 2004 discharge: European Environment Agency |
| Opinion | 2005/2090(DEC) | 2004 discharge: EC general budget, section III, Commission and ECSC in liquidation |
| Opinion | 2005/2001(BUD) | 2006 budget: Section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2005/0228(COD) | Civil aviation: common rules and creation of the European Aviation Safety Agency EASA (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002) |
| Opinion | 2005/0124(CNS) | European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights: establishment, role and mandate replacing the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia EUMC (repeal. Regulation (EC) No 1035/97) |
| Opinion | 2005/0098(COD) | European Maritime Safety Agency: response to pollution caused by ships, multiannual funding (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002) |
| Opinion | 2005/0083(COD) | European Medicines Agency: term of office of Executive Director |
| Opinion | 2005/0082(COD) | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Director’s term of office |
| Opinion | 2005/0081(COD) | European Food Safety Authority: term of office of Executive Director |
| Opinion | 2005/0072(COD) | European Environment Agency and the European Environment Information and Observation Network: term of office of Executive Director |
| Opinion | 2005/0033(COD) | European Union Solidarity Fund: common and coordinated action to provide assistance to the Member States and the candidate countries in case of major disasters or public health emergencies |
| Opinion | 2005/0017(COD) | Gender equality: establishment of a European Institute for Gender Equality |
| Opinion | 2004/2209(INI) | Policy challenges and budgetary means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 |
| Opinion | 2004/2056(DEC) | 2003 discharge: European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal products |
| Opinion | 2004/2054(DEC) | 2003 discharge: European Food Safety Authority |
| Opinion | 2004/2053(DEC) | 2003 discharge: European Environment Agency |
| Opinion | 2004/2040(DEC) | 2003 discharge and follow-up of the 2002 discharge: EC general budget, section III Commission |
| Opinion | 2004/2001(BUD) | 2005 budget: section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2004/0215(CNS) | Police cooperation: establish the European Police College CEPOL as a body of the European Union, purpose, objectives and tasks (repeal. Decision 2000/820/JHA) |
| Opinion | 2004/0108(CNS) | Fisheries: Community Fisheries Control Agency and control system (amend. Regulation (EC) No 2847/93) |
| Opinion | 2003/0260(COD) | LIFE III, financial instrument for the environment: extension till 31 December 2006 (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1655/2000) |
| Opinion | 2003/0257(COD) | Chemicals: classification, labelling, packaging, adaptation to the REACH Regulation (amend. Directive 67/548/EEC) |
| Opinion | 2003/0256(COD) | Chemicals: REACH system and European Agency (amend. Directive 1999/45/EC, repeal. Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Directive 76/769/EEC) |
| Responsible | 2003/0131(CNS) | Own resources: updating financial rules (amend. Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000, implem. Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom) |
| Opinion | 2002/0015(COD) | Indirect taxation in the internal market: Fiscalis programme 2003-2007 |
| Responsible | 2001/2094(BUD) | Supplementary and amending budget 4/2001 |
| Responsible | 2001/2049(BUD) | Supplementary and amending budget 3/2001 |
| Responsible | 2001/2025(BUD) | Supplementary and amending budget 1/2001: BSE crisis |
| Responsible | 2001/2019(INI) | State of the Union's own resources for 2001 |
| Opinion | 2001/0185(COD) | Excisable products: computerised intra-Community movement system |
| Opinion | 2000/2141(COS) | European Community's development policy |
| Opinion | 2000/2137(COS) | Democracy and human rights: EU election assistance and observation |
| Responsible | 2000/2064(BUD) | 2001 budget: conciliation procedure |
| Opinion | 2000/2043(ACI) | Office for official publications of the EC: organisation and working |
| Opinion | 2000/2038(INI) | Progress achieved in implementing the CFSP, Common foreign and security policy |
| Opinion | 2000/2019(COS) | Economic and monetary union EMU and the euro: strategy of communication and information up to 2002 |
| Responsible | 2000/0241(COD) | European system of national and regional accounts ESA 95: VAT-based own resource (amend. Regulation (EC) No 2223/96) |
| Opinion | 2000/0081(CNS) | Common European security and defence policy ESDP: rapid reaction facility |
| Responsible | 1999/2191(BUD) | 2001 Budget: other sections |
| Responsible | 1999/2190(BUD) | 2001 Budget: section III |
| Responsible | 1999/0139(CNS) | Financing the Union 2000-2006: own resources, European Council, Berlin, March 1999 |
| Opinion | 1997/2182(COS) | Agenda 2000: the new financial framework 2000-2006, the future financing system of the Union |
| Opinion | 1997/0188(CNS) | EC own resources: improvement of the collection system (amend. Regul. 1552/89/EEC/EURATOM) |
| Opinion | 1997/0153(COD) | Public health: Programme of Community action 1999-2003 on pollution-related diseases |
| Opinion | 1997/0146(COD) | Public health: Community action programme 1999-2003 concerning rare diseases |
| Opinion | 1997/0132(COD) | Public health: Community action programme 1999-2003 on injury prevention, EHLASS incl. |
| Responsible | 1996/0204(CNS) | EBRD: Community subscription to extra shares following the doubling of the capital |
| Opinion | 1996/0107(CNS) | Small enterprises SMEs: loan guarantees for investments carried out by SMEs creating employment, Elise |
| Opinion | 1995/0206(CNS) | Equal opportunities between men and women: 4th action programme 1996-2000 |
| Opinion | 1995/0131(SYN) | SAVE II: improving energy efficiency in the Community |
| Responsible | 1994/2191(INI) | EC own resources |
| Responsible | 1994/0220(CNS) | Decentralized Community agencies: European Agency for medicinal products, financial regulation |
Born
1951/10/08 Castrop-Rauxel- District Chair, Association of Social-Democratic Women, Western Westphalia. Member of Executive Committee.
- Former municipal councillor in Herten.
- Member of the European Parliament (since 1994). Member of the SPD Executive (Social Democratic Party of Germany) (since 1999).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 3 |
2007/0286(COD) Industrial emissions. Integrated pollution prevention and control (repeal. Directives 78/176/EEC, 82/883/EEC, 92/112/EEC, 1999/13/EC, 2000/76/EC and 2008/1/EC). Recast
2010/03/30
ENVI
3 amendments...
Amendment 72 #
Council position Recital 29 (29) The Commission should review the need to establish Community-wide emission limit values and to amend the emission limit values set out in Annex V for certain large combustion plants, taking into account the review and update of the relevant BAT reference documents. In this context, the Commission should consider the specificity of the energy systems of refineries. For those plants the existing emission limit values under Directive 2001/80/EC will continue to apply pending the possible adoption of new standards through the ordinary legislative procedure.
Amendment 112 #
Council position Article 13 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Where the report referred to in paragraph 5a identifies the need for Union-wide minimum requirements for emission limit values and rules on monitoring and compliance, the Commission shall adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 76, minimum requirements for emission limit values and rules on monitoring and compliance for the activities concerned. Those minimum requirements shall be set appropriately above the BAT-AELs in order to grant derogations in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article. 15(4). Before the minimum requirements for emission limit values and rules on monitoring and compliance for the activities concerned are adopted, the Commission shall make available the conclusions of the exchange of information as referred to in this Article.
Amendment 244 #
Council position Article 32 a (new) Article 32a Higher annual operating hours than those provided for in Parts 1, 2, 4 and 6 of Annex V may be granted by the competent authority to combustion plants which were granted a permit before 27 November 2002 or the operators of which submitted a complete application for a permit before that date, provided that the plant was put into operation no later than 27 November 2003 and provided that a stricter emission limit value is applied that leads to the equivalent environmental protection level for this pollutant on an annual basis.
source: PE-439.994
|
| 15 |
2008/0240(COD) Electrical and electronic equipment: restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances (repeal. Directive 2002/95/EC). Recast
2010/03/19
ENVI
15 amendments...
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 - paragraph 3- point c a (new) (ca) means of transport;
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 - paragraph 3- point c b (new) (cb) large scale fixed industrial installations;
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 - paragraph 3- point c c (new) (cc) large scale industrial tools;
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 - paragraph 3- point c d (new) (cd) equipment which is manufactured in the Community or imported for the purposes of research and development and development vehicles;
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 - paragraph 3- point c e (new) (ce) Spare parts for the repair, or the reuse, updating of functionalities or upgrading of capacity, of electrical and electronic equipment put on the market before 1 July 2006, or for EEE which benefit from an exemption and was placed on the market before that exemption expired. This applies equally for the case of phase-in provisions for specific categories as detailed in Art. 4 of this Directive.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 - paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notwithstanding the exclusion from the scope of this Directive, economic operators shall take all measures necessary to reduce exposure to the substances listed in Annex IV in materials and components of EEE for consumers, workers and the environment to as low a level as is technically and practically possible.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 - point l a (new) (la) "mechanically disjointed" means materials can, in principle be separated by mechanical actions, such as unscrewing, cutting, crushing, grinding and abrasive process;
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 - point p c (new) (pc) 'means of transport' means a vehicle having more than two wheels used for transport of people or cargo, such as airplanes, ships, trains, trams, busses, trucks and cars;
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 - point p d (new) (pd) 'large scale fixed industrial installations' means a particular combination of several types of apparatus and, where applicable, other devices, which are intended for use in an industrial environment, assembled and installed permanently at a predefined location and which cannot be removed without destruction of the building or part of the building;
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 - point p e (new) (pe) 'large scale industrial tools' means machines or systems designed to be used in industry only. They are installed by specialized personnel employed by the manufacturer, the user, a manufacturer representative or other specialized professionals responsible for the installation activity only. They are permanently located during their phase of use.
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 - point p f (new) (pf) 'development vehicles' include boards and systems used for evaluation, validation, demonstration, or development and engineering samples that are not intended to be placed on the market as a single functional or commercial unit;
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 - paragraph 2 2. Measures adopted in accordance with point b of paragraph 1 shall have a
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 - paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall mandate European standardisation bodies without delay to develop harmonised standards for RoHS compliance for each product category listed in Annex I.
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 - paragraph 1 b (new) The Commission shall also, by that date, review the scope and the list of exclusions in Article 2 of this Directive and, based on a comprehensive impact assessment, suggest the inclusion of further product categories if deemed beneficial in view of this Directive's objectives. Specific attention should be given to the potential inclusion of specific consumables and accessories, or of equipment which is part of another type of equipment that does not fall within the scope of this Directive according to Article 2.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 a (new) source: PE-439.865
|
| 17 |
2008/0241(COD) Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Recast
2010/03/16
ENVI
11 amendments...
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) for WEEE falling under categories 1 and
Amendment 177 #
(b) for WEEE falling under categor
Amendment 182 #
(c) for WEEE falling under categor
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 - point -d a (new) (da) for WEEE falling under category 6 of Annex IA - 85% shall be recovered, - 75% shall be recycled, and, - 5% shall be prepared for reuse.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. These targets are calculated as weight percentage of separately collected WEEE that is sent to recovery facilities. Storage, sorting and pre-processing operations (other than preparing for reuse) shall not be included in the calculation of these targets.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that, for the purpose of calculating these targets, producers or third parties acting on their behalf keep records on the mass of WEEE, their components, materials or substances when entering (input) and leaving (output) the treatment facility and
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. In order to facilitate the
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In order to permit a harmonised approach to compliance with the financial guarantee requirements as established in Article 12, the Commission shall, no later than [12 months after entry into force] establish the minimum requirements and methodology for calculating the level of these guarantees, and establish guidelines for their verification and auditing. These requirements should at least ensure that: a) the guarantee creates internalisation of the real end-of-life costs of a producer’s product, taking into account the treatment and recycling standards, b) the cost related to a producer’s obligation are not falling on other actors, now or in the future and c) the guarantee will be present in the future and can be utilised to resolve the outstanding recycling obligation of a producer in case of insolvency.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2b (new) 2b. The financial guarantee should be calculated to ensure the internalisation of the real end-of-life costs of a producer’s product as required by Article 12(2), taking into account treatment and recycling standards, as foreseen by Article 8.
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I A (new) ANNEX IA Categories of equipment in accordance with Article 11 (1) Cooling appliances and radiators (2) Separate screens and monitors (3) Lamps (4) Large appliances other than cooling appliances and radiators, screens and monitors and lamps. Large appliances are all those appliances which are not in principle movable or which are intended in principle to remain in their place of use for the duration of their service life. (5) Small appliances other than cooling appliances and radiators, screens and monitors and lamps and IT and telecommunication equipment. Small appliances are all those appliances which are in principle movable and which are not intended in principle to remain in their place of use for the duration of their service life. (6) Small IT and telecommunications equipment.
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I B (new) source: PE-439.905
2010/11/03
ENVI
6 amendments...
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 This Directive lays down measures to protect the environment and human health by preventing or reducing the adverse impacts of the generation and management of waste from electrical and electronic equipments and by reducing overall impacts of resource use and improving the efficiency of such use, in line with articles 1 and 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC. It also contributes to sustainable consumption and production by improving the environmental performance of all operators involved in the life cycle of electrical and electronic equipment.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point q (q)"remove" means manual, mechanical, chemical or metallurgic handling with the result that hazardous substances, preparations and components are
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt appropriate measures to minimise the disposal of WEEE in the form of unsorted municipal waste and to achieve a high level of separate collection of WEEE, notably, and as a matter of priority, for cooling and freezing equipment containing ozone depleting substances and fluorinated greenhouse gases, for mercury containing lamps and for small appliances.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the collection and transport of separately collected WEEE is carried out in a way which optimises re
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. By 31 December 2012 at the latest the European Parliament and the Council shall re-examine the collection
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission shall develop harmonised standards for the collection, treatment and recycling of WEEE, by 12 months after the entry in to force of this Directive, the European Committee for Standardisation shall be tasked to do so. These standards shall include methods for evaluation of end of life characteristics of products, as required by article 4, especially easiness of dismantling, recyclability and reduction of hazardous substance emissions.
source: PE-439.856
|
| 2 |
2009/0142(COD) European Banking Authority EBA: establishment (amend. Decision No 716/2009/EC)
2010/04/14
BUDG
2 amendments...
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 (41) In order to guarantee its full autonomy and independence, the Authority should be granted an autonomous budget with revenues mainly from obligatory contributions from national supervisory authorities and from the General Budget of the European Union. The Community budgetary procedure should be applicable as far as the Community contribution is concerned. The auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors. The overall budget is subject to the discharge procedure.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 - paragraph 9 9. The European Parliament, following a recommendation from the Council acting by qualified majority, shall, before 15 May of the year N + 2, grant a discharge to the Authority for the implementation of the budget consisting of revenues from the General Budget of the European Union and national supervisory authorities for the financial year N.
source: PE-440.190
|
| 2 |
2009/0143(COD) European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority EIOPA: establisment (amend. Decision No 716/2009/EC)
2010/04/14
BUDG
2 amendments...
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) In order to guarantee its full autonomy and independence, the Authority should be granted an autonomous budget with revenues mainly from obligatory contributions from national supervisory authorities and from the General Budget of the European Union. The Community budgetary procedure should be applicable as far as the Community contribution is concerned. The auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors. The overall budget is subject to the discharge procedure.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 - paragraph 9 9. The European Parliament, following a recommendation from the Council acting by qualified majority, shall, before 15 May of the year N + 2, grant a discharge to the Authority for the implementation of the budget consisting of revenues from the General Budget of the European Union and national supervisory authorities for the financial year N.
source: PE-440.191
|
| 2 |
2009/0144(COD) European Securities and Markets Authority ESMA: establishment (amend. Decision No 716/2009/EC)
2010/04/14
BUDG
2 amendments...
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 (41) In order to guarantee its full autonomy and independence, the Authority should be granted an autonomous budget with revenues mainly from obligatory contributions from national supervisory authorities and from the General Budget of the European Union. The Community budgetary procedure should be applicable as far as the Community contribution is concerned. The auditing of accounts should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors. The overall budget is subject to the discharge procedure.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 - paragraph 9 9. The European Parliament, following a recommendation from the Council acting by qualified majority, shall, before 15 May of the year N + 2, grant a discharge to the Authority for the implementation of the budget consisting of revenues from the General Budget of the European Union and national supervisory authorities for the financial year N.
source: PE-440.195
|
| 3 |
2009/2002(BUD) 2010 budget: section III, Commission
2009/02/10
BUDG
3 amendments...
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recalls that, in view of the Copenhagen conference in December 2009, the fight against climate change will remain one of its top priorities for Budget 2010; considers, however, that this priority is not sufficiently reflected in the draft budget and intends, consequently, to put stronger emphasis on this key policy; reminds the Commission to submit timely a reasonable financing proposal in the aftermath of the climate change conference;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Has decided to put the increase on budget line climate change in developing countries into reserve, waiting for the outcome of the Conference on Climate Change in Copenhagen; stresses, however the need for a new financial instrument to help developing countries to cope with the effects of climate change, so the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) can fulfil its originally assigned tasks in the future;
source: PE-428.297
|
| 2 |
2009/2068(DEC) 2008 discharge: EU general budget, section III, Commission
2010/02/02
ENVI
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to develop further assistance and specific training for applicants and user-friendly guidelines; stresses that
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the importance to provide further and focused assistance to applicants implementing projects under the Public Health programme, in order to avoid unreasonable cost claims and incomplete financial reports which result in lengthy procedures; additionally, calls for clear and user-friendly call for tenders to avoid project applications which are clearly not eligible for funding due to their size and associated high costs or of poor quality;
source: PE-438.441
|
| 1 |
2009/2118(DEC) 2008 discharge: European Medicines Agency EMEA
2010/02/02
ENVI
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses the important role of the European Medicine Agency to ensure the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use; underlines the importance of EMEA's specific provisions for SMEs which led to financial facilitation and fostered innovation and the development of new medicinal products;
source: PE-438.444
|
| 1 |
2009/2124(DEC) 2008 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control ECDC
2010/02/02
ENVI
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Takes note of the difficulties the ECDC faced in 2008 through a missing seat agreement between the Swedish government and the Centre
source: PE-438.446
|
| 5 |
2009/2151(INI) Report on the Commission communication: 'A community approach on the prevention of natural and man made disasters'
2010/03/24
ENVI
5 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Points out the importance of reducing inequalities between regions and Member States in terms of their capacity to protect their populations, environment and economy,
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the need to create a suitable financial instrument for disaster prevention
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 - introduction paragraph 6. Considers that the Member States should introduce measures to prioritise prevention as opposed to repairing damage and at the same time that, inter alia, the following prevention measures should be the subject of priority support from the EU to the Member States, and also that the latter should make better use of the existing possibilities offered by the Structural Funds:
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reiterates
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Invites the Member States to
source: PE-439.951
|
| 4 |
2009/2152(INI) Report on the Commission White Paper: 'Adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action'
2010/02/22
ENVI
4 amendments...
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Takes the view that a framework directive on soil would be an essential tool for adaptation, in particular in response to the risk of soil degradation and desertification; therefore urges the Member States to move forward towards the timely adoption of a framework directive on soil;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26.
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Calls
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
source: PE-439.124
|
| 8 |
2010/0395(COD) Financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union
2011/06/17
BUDG
8 amendments...
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 117 – paragraph 4 4. Grants may not have the purpose or effect of producing a profit within the framework of the action or the work programme of the beneficiary. The first subparagraph shall not apply to: (a) actions the objective of which is the reinforcement of the financial capacity of a beneficiary or the generation of an income
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 117 a (new) Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 117 b (new) Article 117b Co-financing in kind 1. For the purpose of calculating the profit generated by the grant, co- financing in the form of in-kind contributions shall not be taken into account. 2. The authorising officer responsible may accept in-kind contributions as co- financing, if considered necessary or appropriate. Where co-financing in kind is offered in support of low value grants and the authorising officer intends to refuse this, he shall justify why it is not necessary or inappropriate. Such contributions must not exceed: (a) either the costs actually borne and duly supported by accounting documents; (b) or, in the absence of such documents, the costs generally accepted on the market in question. In-kind contributions shall be presented separately in the estimated budget to reflect the total resources allocated to the action. Their unit value is evaluated in the provisional budget and shall not be subject to subsequent changes. In-kind contributions shall comply with national tax and social security rules.
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 122 – paragraph 1 1. The maximum time limit for processing applications shall be six months from the submission of the application. This time- limit may exceptionally be exceeded where the specific nature and subject-matter of the grant so require. Where this is the case, the provisional time limit shall be announced in the respective call for proposals. Where the time limit cannot be met due to other reasons, the authorising officer by delegation shall include this into his annual activity report together with the reasons and proposals for remedial action. He shall report in the following annual activity report on the success of the remedial action. Applications for operating grants should be processed before the beginning of the beneficiary fiscal year. Grant applications shall be submitted in writing.
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 122 a (new) Article 122a The maximum time limit for processing applications shall be six months from the submission of the application. This time- limit may exceptionally be exceeded where the specific nature and subject-matter of the grant so require. Where this is the case, the provisional time limit shall be announced in the respective call for proposals. Where the time limit cannot be met due to other reasons, the authorising officer by delegation shall include this into his annual activity report together with the reasons and proposals for remedial action. He shall report in the following annual activity report on the success of the remedial action.
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 125 Article 125 Article 125 The authorising officer responsible may, if he deems it appropriate and proportionate
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 126 – paragraph 1 1. The amount of the grant shall not become final until after the competent authorising officer
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 126 a (new) Article 126a Periods for record keeping 1. Beneficiaries shall keep records, supporting documents, statistical records and other records pertinent to a grant for: (a) three years following the submission of the final project report in the case of very small grants; (b) six years following the submission of the final project report in the case of small grants; (c) in the case of all other grants, seven years following (i) the submission of the final project report, or (ii) the end of the multiannual financial framework which has been applicable to the respective funding, whichever the earlier. 2. Records related to audits, appeals, litigation or the settlement of claims arising out of the performance of the project shall be retained until such audits, appeals, litigation or claims have been disposed of.
source: PE-467.051
|
| 20 |
2010/2002(BUD) 2011 budget: draft mandate for the draft budget conciliation procedure before the first reading
2010/12/05
BUDG
20 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls for further clarification of the breakdown between operational and administrative expenditure, while acknowledging the efforts made as regards the presentation of administrative expenditure outside heading 5; notes that an already substantial amount of what is, in reality, administrative expenditure
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Notes that climate action is a priority, as set out in the Europe 2020 strategy, and notes the change in the heading of Title 07 to 'Environment and climate action'; takes note of the increase in appropriations proposed for the implementation of EU policy and legislation on climate action, and a new preparatory action on mainstreaming climate action and adaptation; asks for further attention to reforestation;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a new 33a. Requests an adequate budgetary consideration of climate change issues, including EU contribution to international efforts, in the next Multiannual Financial Framework proposal which Commission envisages to adopt before 1 July 2011;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Welcomes the increase in CA for LIFE+ to EUR 333.5 million (up by 8.7%) and welcomes the sharp increase in PA (24,3%, to EUR 268.2 million) in line with improved implementation rates also in view of the follow up actions from the planned biodiversity strategy in 2010; asks to Commission to put more emphasis on LIFE+ projects dealing with water pollution in the Mediterranean and Black Sea and its effects on the seacoast;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a new 34a. Recalls that water and water management is of high importance for the European Union; asks the Commission to fund adequately the monitoring of the correct implementation of EU water legislation to conduct in- depth studies on water accounts at river basin level as well as on the ongoing work on environmental and ecosystem accounts;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 b new 34b. Recalls the priority to ensure correct implementation of the EU environment aquis, and insists that sufficient resources be dedicated to monitoring implementation and follow up of complaint; highlights the importance of associating stakeholders to the preparation and implementation of environmental legislation and calls for adequate resources for supporting NGOs as regards their contribution to this task;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 a new 42a. Regrets that Commission was not able to present a timely proposal on how to fund measures to improve public awareness of the harmful effects of tobacco consumption via the Community's Tobacco fund in 2011 which results in a p.m. on budget line 17 03 02; requests from the Commission a proposal before the budget negotiations commence between the European Parliament and the Council;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 a new 45a. Recalls that in light of the pan- epidemic flu H1N1 and the continuing challenges such as increasing antimicrobial resistance in Europe, that public health is an important priority; therefore considers that it is necessary to adequately fund the ECDC to fulfil its legal obligations;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 a new 50a. Draws attention to the importance of predictable and reliable international financing for climate efforts in developing countries as a precondition for international climate agreement for the period after 2012; expresses its concern regarding coherence and visibility of the EU fast start finance contribution in the Copenhagen Accord and calls for Member States to make information promptly available for the Commission to ensure full transparency and additionality of the EU contribution;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 68 68. Welcomes the overall stabilisation of EU budget expenditure on decentralised agencies at EUR 679.2 million;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 68 a new 68a. Is concerned that the Commission defies Parliament's vote regarding the handling of assigned revenues of fee depending agencies in three consecutive years; notes Commission's intention with this approach to increase margins artificially, especially under tight headings such as heading 1A; requests an immediate correction of this attitude;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 a new 69a. Notes further that Commission applies its policy for zero growth in staff also to decentralised agencies even given additional tasks need implementation, therewith producing a disproportionate increase of contractual staff working as "modern slaves" in highly scientific or regulatory areas; is convinced that under those circumstances it is rather difficult for some decentralised agencies to attract highly qualified personnel to carry out tasks defined by the EU legislator;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 70 a new 70a. Requests from the European Commission to present without delay an Amending Budget to the Budgetary Authority when the European Legislators has come to a political agreement on dossiers relating to extending tasks of decentralised agencies; reminds in this context that Commission has followed itself the approach "to outsource" certain tasks to decentralised agencies;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 70 b new 70b. Reminds Commission to consider in its assessment of budgetary needs for decentralised agencies that appropriations generated by fees paid by industry can not be used for preparatory actions to implement European legislation;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 a new 71a. Is convinced that the Financial programming 2011-2013 for the Chemicals agency is too optimistic and considers the self-financing of this agency in 2011 as very unrealistic; points out that the anticipated fee income in 2011 is based on assessments carried out in 2006; asks for the setting-up of precautionary measures which apply in the case of need;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 b new 71b. Notes the introduction of two new budget lines called 'Chemicals Agency - activities in the field of Biocides legislation'; reminds in this context that no fees generated by industry can be used for preparatory measures in this field; is alert that additional funds must be made available to the agency if preparatory tasks are necessary for the future implementation of additional tasks within the scope of ECHA;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 c new 71c. Observes Commission's (DG SANCO) intended delay to comply with article 45 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council which asks for a consultation paper on the feasibility and advisability of European legislation on fees for the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) by March 2005; reminds in this context that an amount has been put in reserve on the same issue in the 2010 budget;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 d new 71d. Notes that the EU contribution to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is decreasing over the years despite the fact that the EU legislator is assigning additional public health issues to the agency that should be financed by EU subsidies; notes further, that as a consequence more and more public health activities have to be cross-subsidised by fee income with the result that public health related activities will need to be reduced as the Agency needs to cover its fee related activities as a priority; is therefore worried about Commission's approach to included again EMA's assigned revenues in the calculation of the DB foreseen for EMA;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 e new 71e. Reaffirms EMA's legal obligation to process all medical applications that arrive within a given timeframe; as a consequence more applications not only render more fees but also trigger the requirement to process these applications by more staff; supports therefore EMA's request for 48 temporary agents as specialized scientific staff with professional experience with budgetary neutrality for the EU budget as the posts are solely financed by fees;
source: PE-441.198
|
| 3 |
2010/2003(BUD) 2011 budget, other sections: guidelines
2010/02/25
BUDG
3 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the circumstances under which the 2010 and 2011 budgets will be adopted are quite exceptional and challenging as, on the one hand, successful implementation of the Lisbon Treaty is a major priority that will also be challenging financially while, on the other hand, the effects of the financial crisis are still very present
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Reiterates its call to receive a medium- to long-term strategy paper on Parliament's buildings policy, to provide a basis for future relevant decisions in this area; points to the need for a specific report and any possible recommendations concerning unnecessarily high maintenance, renovation and purchase costs relating to Parliament's buildings; underlines, in this context, the need to receive a complete financial statement concerning the House of European History when the architects' competition is completed, as otherwise no in-depth assessment on the long-term costs will be possible in terms of Parliament's buildings strategy and Parliament's budget;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 c (new) 13c. Endorses the importance of information sources and information services being made available to Members, staff and the wider public, with a view to fostering further public dialogue; recalls, in this respect, the strengthening of the relevant directorate within Parliament's administrative structure, with a view to ensuring a professional information service; expects further improvements in terms of an overall Knowledge Management System to facilitate the dissemination of all information at both political and administrative levels;
source: PE-439.234
|
| 8 |
2010/2004(BUD) 2011 budget, section III, Commission: guidelines
2010/02/26
BUDG
8 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that, for 2011, the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2007-2013 provides for an overall level of commitment appropriations (CA) of EUR 142 269 billion, representing a potential maximum increase of only 0.83% over the 2010 budget as adopted by the European Parliament (EUR 141 453 billion in CA); notes that the level of payment appropriations (PA) is set at EUR 134 263 billion, an increase of 9.2% over the 2010 budget (EUR 122 937 billion in PA); recalls that these amounts are
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that, in addition to considerations regarding the MFF ceilings for the remaining years (2011-2013), the budgetary authority has been obliged to revise the MFF several times because it did not allow the EU to react properly and satisfactorily to various challenges that have arisen in recent years; reiterates its conviction that an in-depth review and revision of the MFF is an absolute necessity and expects the Commission to present its report as defined by Declaration 3 of the IIA mid-2010;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Underlines that the remaining improvements needed in this respect, notably as regards the DGs within the RELEX family and pre-accession, are crucial both in order to ensure better- informed decision-making by the budgetary authority and with a view to deriving full benefit from the introduction of activity-based budgeting and strategic planning and programming within the Commission, especially when taking into account the new tasks and challenges foreseen by the Lisbon Treaty;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Is convinced, in the context of the global economic slowdown, that the EU should concentrate its efforts on actively supporting innovative and climate change reducing technologies that are making an essential contribution to overcoming the economic crisis and establishing the EU as a leading competitive economy;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a new 16 a. Points out that climate change has an impact on Europe’s environment, economy and society; in this context, underlines the importance of an integrated and coordinated approach on EU level to support and strengthen measures at national, regional and local level; considers it necessary to build up further appropriate policy responses and to develop a knowledge base which is also made available to other countries; reiterates its conviction that still the EU budget does not reflect satisfactorily this general context to mitigate climate change;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Stresses that it intends to use all the means provided for in the IIA of 17 May 2006 to mobilise funds for these priorities, and underlines that this financial effort may necessitate the shifting of funds from other instruments or programmes; considers that the EU could transfer funds from badly implemented programmes, or those with a comparatively large level of appropriations, to these priorities, thereby improving the quality of its spending and thereby increasing European added value, which is essential in a context of constrained public finances;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41. Points out that, following an amending budget for 2010, 2011 will be the first fully operational year for the European External Action Service (EEAS); intends to provide the EEAS with the necessary administrative means to fulfil its mission, but recalls that, under the treaty and in full accordance with the common intention to increase the EP’s involvement in the shaping and management of the EU’s external relations, it will fully exercise its scrutiny over the budget and budgetary control of EEAS;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Points out that, with respect to salaries and pensions, the increase adopted by the Council in December 2009 was 1.85%, i.e. only half of the percentage resulting from the ‘method’, and that, depending on the outcome of the court case resulting from the challenge lodged by the Commission and the European Parliament, the difference, with retroactive effect, could amount to about EUR 140 million across all the institutions;
source: PE-439.297
|
| 5 |
2010/2007(INI) 2008 discharge: performance, financial management and control of agencies
2010/03/03
CONT
5 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that many of the host agreements concluded between the agencies and the host countries have shortcomings that detract from the agencies’ efficiency (e.g. expensive transport links to some agencies, problems with buildings rented by some agencies), social inclusion of staff; calls accordingly, when the initial decision is taken by the Council on where an agency is to be located, for host countries to supply more detailed host agreements that will better serve the interests of the agency; is also in favour of thought being given to moving agencies in cases where the host agreement is seriously undermining the agency’s effectiveness; requests the Inter- Institutional Working group on Agencies to tackle the issue and possibly to define common standards for host agreements;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses the importance of including an assessment of agencies’ performance in the discharge process which is made available to the competent committee dealing with its respective agencies in the European Parliament; calls accordingly on the Court of Auditors (ECA) to look into the matter in its next reports on the agencies;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Notes, furthermore, that some agencies have difficulties in dealing with large increases in their budgets; wonders, therefore, whether it would not be more responsible for the budgetary authorities, in future, to take greater care to decide on increases in some agencies’ budgets in the light of the time needed to carry out the new activities;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Voices concern at the fact that the ECA again noted shortcomings in the planning and implementation of staff recruitment procedures in some agencies; stresses, in particular, the need to narrow the gap between posts filled and posts on the establishment plan in the agencies; acknowledges the difficulties arising from the implementation of the EU Staff Regulations, especially for decentralised agencies; calls on the agencies also provide better guarantees of transparent, non-discriminatory treatment of external and internal applicants;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas there has been an unprecedented increase in the number of agencies over recent years, as decided by the EU legislator, and whereas this has enabled some of the Commission’s tasks to be outsourced and additional tasks given to agencies, at the risk of this appearing in some cases to be tantamount to a dismantlement of the Community’s administration that is jeopardising its ability to carry out its duties,
source: PE-439.260
|
| 3 |
2010/2173(DEC) 2009 discharge: European Medicines Agency EMEA
2011/09/03
CONT
3 amendments...
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Is
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 source: PE-460.805
|
| 8 |
2010/2271(DEC) 2009 discharge: performance, financial management and control of the agencies
2011/09/03
CONT
8 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the high level of carryovers and cancellations
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the agencies' recruitment plans are often not fully executed and observes a lack of consistency between budgetary and staff forecasting which could affect the stakeholders' view on the agencies' use of their staff; encourages the Union institutions to further explore how recruitment procedures could be simplified; calls, accordingly, on the agencies to put further effort into the implementation and monitoring of their recruitment planning; encourages the agencies also to provide in their Work Programme and AARs additional information on the allocation and use of their human resources and a description of the impact on the available staff when setting their objectives;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the agencies to ensure that sensitive tasks are not assigned to interim staff knowing that interim staff are recruited subject to the limits of the establishment plan; notes, in fact, that in some cases agencies hired these staff to perform sensitive tasks or have access to sensitive information; wishes to stress the risks of potential security breaches linked to interim staff's access to sensitive information or unawareness by them of the procedure to follow;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Considers the role of the IAS as internal auditor of the decentralised agencies as
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Expresses its satisfaction with the second successful year of operation of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), the Commission (DG Enterprise and Industry) having been responsible for the budgetary management of the ECHA in 2007; emphasises, in particular, that the smooth and fairly rapid establishment of the ECHA is mainly due to the effective support provided by its par
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Welcomes the on-going work of the Interinstitutional Working Group on Agencies which has the objective to
source: PE-460.807
|
| 19 |
2011/0177(APP) Multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020
2012/05/10
BUDG
7 amendments...
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Strongly supports the Commission’s proposal to mainstream measures to combat climate change, leading to at least 20% of climate-related expenditure1, across the whole EU budget; believes that the EU budget will be able to mobilise investment for a sustainable and prosperous low-carbon economy, provide adequate support for achieving the EU 2020 targets for climate, energy, resource- efficiency and biodiversity
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Reaffirms, in this context, its position in favour of a significant increase - notably through the Connecting Europe Facility - in the funding available for the Union programmes in the fields of competiveness, SMEs and sustainable infrastructures, which are at the heart of the Europe 2020 strategy; strongly believes that further cuts with respect to the Commission proposal will seriously jeopardise the EU’s credibility and its political commitment in favour of growth and jobs;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Underlines the importance of research and innovation in accelerating the transition towards a sustainable, world- leading, knowledge-based economy which uses its natural resources efficiently and responsibly; calls on the EU institutions and the Member States to agree on a specific roadmap for achieving the 3 % GDP target of investment in research; points to the massive economic commitment that this target would entail, in terms of additional expenditure totalling EUR 130 billion, annually and funded from all sources; stresses, consequently, the need to enhance, stimulate and secure the financing of research and innovation in the Union via a significant increase in expenditure, and notably in EU research and innovation funding;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Considers that EU cohesion policy is a strategic tool for investment, sustainable growth and competitiveness, with an undisputed EU added value; insists that, in order to effectively reduce macroeconomic imbalances within the EU and contribute to economic, social and territorial cohesion, it should be able to rely on a stable, solid and sustainable financial framework; reaffirms its position that cohesion policy funding should be maintained at least at the level of the 2007-2013 period;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Recalls its position that, given the wide array of tasks, challenges and objectives that the CAP is called on to respond to, the amounts allocated to the CAP in the budget year 2013 should be at least maintained during the next financial programming period; stresses, in this context, the important role played by the second pillar of the CAP, which makes a significant contribution to investment and job creation in rural areas, to managing the environment and preserving biodiversity, and to enhancing the effectiveness and competitiveness of the farming industry;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Emphasises that strengthening the well targeted and effective Union programme for environment and climate is indispensable and that integrated spending for climate and environment should be actively supported within relevant Union funds;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Supports the introduction of (ex-ante and ex
source: PE-496.663
2012/07/18
ENVI
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Introductory paragraph The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Budgets
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Welcomes the Europe 2020 strategy accompanied by its flagship initiatives which need to be translated into concrete actions, commitments and legislative frameworks; is committed to transform the European Union with an enhanced engagement in more sustainability towards smart, inclusive and competitive Europe; is convinced that investments in biodiversity and ecosystem measures and in resource efficiency as well as complementary actions at EU level in the public health area will contribute to sustainable growth and jobs;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Strongly believes that the Europe 2020 strategy should be the main policy reference for the next MFF; is convinced that all internal policies contribute to achieving the targets set by the Europe 2020 strategy; considers, as a consequence, that the structure of the MFF should reflect and give political visibility to the Europe 2020 dimensions of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; is not convinced that the structure proposed by the Commission, only reshaping slightly the existing structure, is translating the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Recalls the EP's previous request that the Union's ambition of taking a sustainable low-carbon development path is mainstreamed into all spending policies; emphasises that a failure to decidedly target funds towards sustainability within the Union's cohesion, infrastructure, agriculture and research policy will lead to a feigned, short-sighted increase in flexibility, while strongly reducing the flexibility of future generations; calls, therefore, for intelligent earmarking within all funds as suggested in respective ENVI opinions, leading to at least 20% of climate-related expenditure1;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Strongly demands that at least 0.5% of the Union budget be allocated to the LIFE Programme, given its extremely positive track record as a small, but well targeted and effective instrument and its high European Added Value as only instrument exclusively targeting climate and environment challenges; emphasises that integrated spending for climate and environment via LIFE Integrated Projects should be actively supported within relevant Union funds; calls for LIFE being equipped with the necessary share to contribute to a sound and steady management of the Natura 2000 network, taking into account the secured contribution of other Union funds;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 e (new) 3e. Strongly believes that the current debt crisis should not lead to short-sighted investments jeopardizing, in addition to its financial capital, the Union's natural capital by further degrading biodiversity and eco-system services; calls instead for the establishment of the appropriate framework to counter the crisis by forward-looking investments into major future challenges such as resource- efficiency, climate change and eco-system preservation, where potential economic and social benefits would be significant;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Believes that the next MFF should allow for a ring-fencing of large-scale projects such as the Global Monitoring For Environment and Security programme (GMES); considers that the EU budget should make a long-term contribution to this project, in order to ensure its planning continuity and organisation stability; considers that, should additional financial resources be needed for this large-scale project, those should not be found at the expense of smaller successful projects that are financed by the EU budget;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Takes note of the indicative amounts per decentralised agency in the remit of the Committee on Environment, Public health and Food Safety as proposed by the Commission; is not convinced that those figures correspond to the needs of the agencies to fulfil their given tasks as they represent a freezing of the agencies' budgets; requests that sufficient appropriations need to be assured for agencies working in the field of environment, public health and food safety;
source: PE-494.509
|
| 23 |
2011/0276(COD) Structural instruments: common provisions for ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD and EMFF; general provisions applicable to ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund
2012/04/06
REGI
4 amendments...
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 4 – paragraph 6 6. In accordance with their respective responsibilities, the Commission and the Member States shall ensure coordination among the CSF Funds, and with other Union policies and instruments, including those in the framework of the Union's external action. Special attention shall be given and, where relevant, resources be allocated for areas in which other Union funds explicitly provide for an integrated approach, such as joint funding for integrated projects in the field of environment and climate.
Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new) (iv a) the potential amount of support foreseen for complementary activities with non CSF-funds that specifically provide for such cooperation, such as joint funding for integrated projects in the field of environment and climate; for Partnership Contracts that identify environment or climate as thematic objectives, the Member State shall ensure that priority is given to funding activities that complement integrated projects in those fields;
Amendment 595 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) the mechanisms at national and regional level that ensure coordination between the CSF Funds and other Union and national funding instruments, especially where those provide for a structured cooperation such as the LIFE programme, and with the EIB;
Amendment 676 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 17 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall set out the detailed actions relating to the fulfilment of ex ante conditionalities, including the timetable for their implementation, in the relevant programmes. With regards to the implementation of plans or strategies under the thematic objectives 4, 5 and 6, Member States shall consider integrated projects in the field of climate and environment as a potential model for an efficient, coherent and well coordinated implementation.
source: PE-489.656
2012/05/06
REGI
2 amendments...
Amendment 1365 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (i) the mechanisms that ensure coordination between the Funds, the EAFRD, the EMFF and other Union and national funding instruments, especially where those provide for a structured cooperation such as the LIFE programme, and with the EIB;
Amendment 1368 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 87 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i a (new) (i a) the arrangement of cooperation on environmental and climate priorities between different sectoral administrations on national and regional level, leading to, first, the identification of areas in which activities that complement integrated projects in the environment and climate field could be envisaged and, second, the determination of funding areas where the use of solutions, methods and approaches validated under the LIFE programme can be beneficial;
source: PE-491.056
2012/05/31
ENVI
17 amendments...
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 6 6. In accordance with their respective responsibilities, the Commission and the Member States shall ensure coordination among the CSF Funds, and with other Union policies and instruments, including those in the framework of the Union's external action. Special attention shall be given and, where relevant, resources be allocated for areas in which other Union funds explicitly provide for an integrated approach, such as joint funding for integrated projects in the field of environment and climate.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Operations financed by the CSF Funds shall comply with applicable Union and national law and should not, through their support for strategic long-lasting investments, undermine the strategic long-term coherent application of this legislation.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 The Member States and the Commission shall ensure that environmental protection requirements, resource efficiency, climate change mitigation and adaptation, disaster resilience and risk prevention and management are promoted in the preparation and implementation of Partnership Contracts and programmes. Member States shall provide information on the support for climate change
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv (iv) the indicative allocation of support by the Union by thematic objective at national level for each of the CSF Funds, as well as the total indicative amount of support foreseen for climate change and environmental, including biodiversity and resource efficiency, objectives;
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new) (iv a) the potential amount of support foreseen for complementary activities with non CSF-funds that specifically provide for such cooperation, such as joint funding for integrated projects in the field of environment and climate; for Partnership Contracts that identify environment or climate as thematic objectives, the Member State shall ensure that priority is given to funding activities that complement integrated projects in those fields;
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) the mechanisms at national and regional level that ensure coordination between the CSF Funds and other Union and national funding instruments, especially where those provide for a structured cooperation such as the LIFE programme, and with the EIB;
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall set out the detailed actions relating to the fulfilment of ex ante conditionalities, including the timetable for their implementation, in the relevant programmes. With regards to the implementation of plans or strategies under the thematic objectives 4, 5 and 6, Member States shall consider integrated projects in the field of climate and environment as a potential model for an efficient, coherent and well coordinated implementation.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 5 5. Each programme, except those where technical assistance is undertaken under a specific programme, shall set out the indicative amount of support to be used for climate change and environmental, including biodiversity and resource efficiency, objectives.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) progress towards achievement of the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, in particular in respect of the milestones set out for each programme in the performance framework and the support used for climate change and environmental, including biodiversity and resource efficiency, objectives;
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 4 4. The ex ante evaluation shall incorporate
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (i) the mechanisms that ensure coordination between the Funds, the EAFRD, the EMFF and other Union and national funding instruments, especially where those provide for a structured cooperation such as the LIFE programme, and with the EIB;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i a (new) (ia) the arrangement of cooperation on environmental and climate priorities between different sectoral administrations on national and regional level, leading to, first, the identification of areas in which activities that complement integrated projects in the environment and climate field could be envisaged and, second, the determination of funding areas where the use of solutions, methods and approaches validated under the LIFE programme can be beneficial;
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 87 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall submit an opinion of the national or, dependent on the level where the operational programme is prepared, regional environmental bodies on the measures set out in point (i), and an opinion of the national or regional equality bodies on the measures set out in points (ii) and (iii) with the proposal for an operational programme under the Investment for growth and jobs goal.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 - Table 1 – row 6 – subrow 6.2 a (new) 6.2a. Air quality: – A comprehensive air quality Implementation of the management strategy is in place, Directive 2008/50/EC of the including evidence of the adoption of European Parliament and air quality plans that set out measures of the Council of 21 May in order to attain the limit values or 2008 on ambient air quality target values, in accordance with and cleaner air for Europe. article 23 of Directive 2008/50/EC.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 - Table 1 – row 6 – subrow 6.2 b (new) 6.2b. Nature and - Member States have set out funding Biodiversity: priorities for management and Implementation of Council restoration of Natura 2000 areas as Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 part of national or regional Prioritised May 1992 on the Action Frameworks, in accordance conservation of natural with Article 8 of Directive 92/43/EEC habitats and of wild fauna on the conservation of natural habitats and flora (Habitats and of wild fauna and flora, having Directive), especially with regard to the co-financing regards to Prioritised opportunities under different EU Action Frameworks funding instruments. foreseen in Art. 8 (4).
Amendment 95 #
- measures to ensure sufficient administrative capacity so that timely assessments, at a stage to influence the planning process, can be guaranteed.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 - Table 2 – row 7 7. Statistical The existence of a statistical – A multi-annual plan for timely collection systems and result system necessary to and aggregation of data is in place that indicators undertake evaluations to includes: assess the effectiveness and
source: PE-489.530
|
| 6 |
2011/0288(COD) Common agricultural policy (CAP): financing, management and monitoring 2014-2020
2012/07/20
AGRI
6 amendments...
Amendment 576 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 93 – paragraph 3 Directive 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy will be considered as being part of Annex II
Amendment 588 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 93 – paragraph 4 Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides will be considered as being part of Annex II
Amendment 709 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II — Main Issue "Water" — SMR 1 a (new) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy
Amendment 710 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II — Main Issue "Water" — SMR 1 a (new) — last column Article 9, Article 11(3)(e), Article 11(3)(g), Article 11(3)(h), Article 11(3)(i), Article 11(3)(j)
Amendment 736 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II — Main Issue "Biodiversity" — SMR 2— last column Article 3(1), Article 3(2)(b), Article 4 (1), (2) and (4), Article 5(a), (b), (d)
Amendment 740 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II — Main Issue "Biodiversity" — SMR 3— last column Article 6 (1) and (2), Article 6 (3), (4), Article 13(1)(a)
source: PE-494.482
|
| 1 |
2011/0339(COD) Health for Growth Programme 2014-2020
2012/09/05
BUDG
1 amendments...
Amendment 17 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Recalls its resolution of 8 June 2011 on Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe1; reiterates that sufficient additional resources are needed in the next MFF in order to enable the Union to fulfil its existing policy priorities and the new tasks provided for in the Treaty of Lisbon, as well as to respond to unforeseen events; points out that even with an increase in the level of resources for the next MFF of at least 5% compared to the 2013 level only a limited contribution can be made to the achievement of the Union’s agreed objectives and commitments and the principle of Union solidarity; challenges the Council, if it does not share this approach, to clearly identify which of its policy priorities or projects could be dropped altogether, despite their proven European added value; __________________ 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0266.
source: PE-489.376
|
| 3 |
2011/0427(COD) European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR)
2012/09/25
BUDG
3 amendments...
Amendment 14 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses that point 47 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management1 should apply for the extension of the mandate for the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the external Borders; emphasises that any decision of the legislative authority in favour of such an extension shall be without prejudice to the decisions of the budgetary authority in the context of the annual budgetary procedure; ________________ 1 OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.
Amendment 15 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Requests that the Commission present a new financial statement which fully takes into account the result of the legislative agreement between the European Parliament and Council to meet the budgetary and staff requirements in the Agency and in Commission's services;
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a new (5 a) The Agency should be provided with the appropriate financial and human resources, in order to adequately fulfil the additional tasks assigned to it under this Regulation. For this purpose, the procedure for the establishment, implementation and control of its budget as set out in Articles 29 and 30 of Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 should take due account of these tasks. The budgetary authority should ensure that the best standards of efficiency are met.
source: PE-496.473
|
| 8 |
2011/0428(COD) Programme for the Environment and Climate Action, LIFE 2014-2020
2012/07/16
BUDG
6 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) This Regulation lays down, for the entire duration of the LIFE Programme, a financial envelope of
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The financial envelope for implementing the LIFE Programme shall be EUR
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) EUR
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) EUR
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) no later than 30
source: PE-492.950
2012/10/07
ENVI
2 amendments...
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 a (new) Article 8a Visibility of the LIFE Programme The coordinating beneficiary and associated beneficiaries shall publicise the LIFE Programme project and its results, always mentioning the Union support received. The LIFE logo, depicted in Annex, shall be used for all communication activities and appear on notice boards at strategic places visible to the public. All durable goods acquired in the framework of the LIFE Programme shall bear the LIFE logo unless otherwise specified by the Commission.
source: PE-492.686
|
| 7 |
2011/2019(BUD) 2012 budget: mandate for the trilogue
2011/05/24
BUDG
7 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the promotion of jobs and high-quality employment by delivering on the Europe 2020 strategy’s seven flagship initiatives is a jointly endorsed goal of the 27 EU Member States; recalls that the implementation of this strategy will require a huge amount of future-oriented investment up to 2020, estimated at no less than EUR 1 800 billion by the Commission in its communication entitled ‘The EU Budget Review’3 ; underlines, therefore, that necessary investment in education, fostering a knowledge society, research and development, innovation, SMEs
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Stresses that part of the spending under Heading 2 is instrumental in realising the Europe 2020 goals; emphasises that the priority goals of this strategy – growth and employment – are also accomplished through the rural development programmes; regards climate action and food security as two of the main challenges for the CAP; calls, therefore, for a further greening of the CAP, which should also contribute to meeting the vast environmental challenges the EU faces, including water pollution;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39a. Welcomes, in this context, the increase for the LIFE+ programme (+4.3% and +1.9% in commitments and payments respectively) which gives priority solely to environment and climate action projects; reminds again that environmental problems and their solutions do not recognise national borders, thus dealing with it at EU level is self-evident;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 a (new) 53a. Welcomes the increase for the Public Health programme as public health has become a key-driver for competitiveness in ageing European societies,; acknowledges the Commission’s efforts to find financing solutions for continuing important educational campaigns such as the HELP campaign for a life without tobacco;
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 75 75. Notes the overall level of EUR 720.8 million (i.e. 0.49% of the total EU budget) devoted to EU decentralised agencies in DB 2012, an increase in the total EU contribution as compared to the 2011 Budget of EUR 34.6 million, or +4.9%; is aware that this increase mainly stems from the one new5 and seven phasing-in agencies6 , with a view to providing them with adequate funding; underlines the importance of additional funding for those 10 agencies7 , the tasks of which have been extended, so as not to hinder their performance; notes that the increase in the EU contribution to the agencies at cruising speed is in line with, or even below, inflation correction (2%), with no additional staff;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 76 76. Stresses that EU agencies’ budget allocations are far from consisting in administrative expenditure alone, but instead contribute to achieving the Europe 2020 goals and EU objectives in general, as decided by the legislative authority; endorses therefore, in times of austerity, the Commission’s restrictive approach to determining EU decentralised agencies’ subsidies from the EU budget, but disapproves again of the use of assigned revenue to reduce the EU Budget contribution to fee-dependent agencies, which is used by the Commission to increase margins artificially, is in this context concerned that the Commission repeatedly ignores the political will of the European Parliament;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 77 a (new) 77a. Disapproves the Commission’s approach to change the presentation of the two-self-financed agencies OHIM and CPVO in the DB 2012, i.e. deleting the respective budget lines and deciding not to publish the establishment plans; takes note, nevertheless, that the two respective agencies are not bound to any decisions by the Budget Authority regarding the subsidy levels or the staffing; intends, however, to provide these information in the budget as a matter of transparency; reiterates again that a solution needs to be found for the excessive surpluses gained by the OHIM fee regulation;
source: PE-465.029
|
| 4 |
2011/2020(BUD) 2012 budget: all sections
2011/06/10
BUDG
4 amendments...
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Provides for a continued support on a commensurate level for the LIFE+ programme, which gives priority solely to environment and climate action projects; reminds again that environmental problems and their solutions do not recognise national borders, thus dealing with it at EU level is self-evident; calls in this respect on the Member States to significantly improve their implementation of EU environmental legislation and requests from the Commission to strengthen their infringement procedures in a consistent way;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39a. Welcomes the credits for the Public Health programme which complements and adds value to Member States’ actions in the area of health promotion and prevention of illness; supports the Commission’s efforts to continue the HELP campaign for a life without tobacco under the Public Health programme;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 a (new) 52a. Agrees in general that agencies' surpluses should be taken into account when establishing the draft budget and presented in a clear and transparent manner; however, reiterates that surpluses of fee-receiving agencies, should be exempted from this general rule in order to cover for the unreliability of their income;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 a (new) 54a. Regrets that newly assigned tasks to agencies can not be accompanied by an adequate level of funding which is still necessary despite all redeployment efforts; requests the Commission to present amending budget requests in due time in order to avoid hampering of the implementation of EU legislation by EU decentralised agencies;
source: PE-473.841
|
| 1 |
2011/2068(INI) Resource-efficient Europe
2012/03/13
ENVI
1 amendments...
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Is concerned about the increasing application of nano-technology - e.g. silver in nano-particles for anti-bacterial use - which may lead to irretrievability of these materials; calls for careful study of the environmental impact before the technique is more widely taken up;
source: PE-485.854
|
| 23 |
2011/2217(DEC) 2010 discharge: European Environment Agency (EEA)
2012/07/03
CONT
23 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that agencies' level of budget execution in terms of committed appropriations and of payment appropriations provide important information to enable the discharge authority to assess their overall performance; notes
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes from the Agency's Final Accounts that cancellation of unused payment appropriations carried over from the previous year amounted to EUR 585 282,87; understands from the Agency that this amount is lower to the amount cancelled in 2009, i.e. EUR 693 127,02;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. 8. Calls on the Internal Audit Service (IAS)
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Is informed that 7 internal candidates and 40 external applicants were recruited in 2010; acknowledges the split amongst categories of internal candidates of 1 official, 5 temporary agents and 1 contract agent and the split amongst externally recruited staff of 1 official, 13 temporary agents, 29 contract agents and 4 national experts;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Is
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Considers the training as a necessity in order to support the Agency's commitment to the International Year of Biodiversity in 2010, as laid down in the Management Plan and Work Programme for 2010; notes that the main focus of this activity was to increase the understanding of how to establish citizen science programmes in response to policy requirements for greater citizen participation in the area of Biodiversity and Marine Protected Areas;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Recognises the special training of staff as part of the career development; takes note that the total amount paid, EUR 33,791, to Earthwatch represents less than 7 % of the overall envelope dedicated by the Agency to professional development;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Agency and its Executive Director to
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Finds it
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Acknowledges that in 2010 the IAS concluded an audit on the
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 – introductory part Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 – introductory part 25.
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Draws attention to its recommendations from previous discharge reports, as set out in the Annex to this resolution; acknowledges the Agency's efforts to implement recommendations and to identify remedying actions;
source: PE-483.625
|
| 1 |
2011/2226(DEC) 2010 discharge: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
2012/10/01
ENVI
1 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Takes note of the revision of the Authority's procedures in December 2010 to ensure the implementation of the obligations deriving from Articles 16(2), 17 and 19 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union, laid down in Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/681; has been informed that in 2010 20 staff members left the Authority of whom all have received a letter upon departure reminding them of their obligations vis-à- vis the Authority; ________________ 1 OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p.1.
source: PE-478.706
|
| 1 |
2011/2297(INI) Implementation of EU water legislation, ahead of a necessary overall approach to European water challenges
2012/04/05
ENVI
1 amendments...
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Is concerned about the increasing application of nano-technology and the increasing presence of nano-particles in water; is concerned about the irretrievability of these materials and the lack of knowledge about the long term impact of nano-particles on water quality, ecosystems, biodiversity and human health; calls for obligatory impact assessment and the setting of health standards before the technique is more widely taken up;
source: PE-487.993
|
| 24 |
2012/0192(COD) Clinical trials on medicinal products for human use
2013/03/01
ENVI
10 amendments...
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 1. Informed consent shall be written, dated and signed and given freely by the subject or his or her legal representative after having been
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the informed consent of the legal representative has been obtained
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the explicit wish of an incapacitated subject who is capable of forming an opinion and assessing this information to refuse participation in, or to be withdrawn from, the clinical trial at any time is
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (ha) the Ethics Committee, with expertise in the relevant disease and the patient population concerned, or after taking advice in clinical, ethical and psychosocial questions in the field of the relevant disease and patient population concerned, has endorsed the protocol;
Amendment 487 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the minor has received all relevant information in a way adapted to his or her age and maturity, from
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the explicit wish of a minor who is capable of forming an opinion and assessing this information to refuse participation in, or to be withdrawn from, the clinical trial at any time, is duly taken into consideration by the investigator
Amendment 496 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point h b (new) (hb) the corresponding scientific guidelines of the Agency have been followed;
Amendment 498 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point h d (new) (hd) the Ethics Committee, with paediatric expertise or after taking advice in clinical, ethical and psychosocial problems in the field of paediatrics, has endorsed the protocol;
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the Ethics committee positively assesses that a direct benefit of the clinicial trial for the patient is to be expected, as well as the fact that the clinical trial poses a minimal risk to, and imposes a minimal burden on, the subject.
Amendment 570 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The responsible Ethics Committee shall be involved in the assessment of this information.
source: PE-506.161
2013/03/06
ENVI
14 amendments...
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Within
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Where the proposed reporting Member State has not notified the sponsor within
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 Where the proposed reporting Member State has not notified the sponsor according to points (a) to (d) of paragraph 2 within
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) within
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) within
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) within
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 5. Until the assessment date, any Member State concerned may communicate to the reporting Member State any considerations relevant to the application. The reporting Member State shall take those considerations duly into account and shall document them in the assessment report. If the assessment report of the reporting Member State deviates from the considerations of the Member States concerned, it shall state the reasons for this deviation in the assessment report.
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new) Notwithstanding the first and second subparagraphs, in case of other conflict, the Member States involved shall attempt to agree on a conclusion. If no conclusion is found, the Commission shall take a decision on the conclusion after having heard the Member States involved, and, if appropriate, having taken advice from the European Medicines Agency.
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 A substantial modification may only be implemented if it has been approved in accordance with the procedure set out in this Chapter, and if it has been approved by an independent ethics committee before its implementation.
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Within
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 Notification shall be done by way of one single decision within ten days from the
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the subject or, where the subject is not able to give informed consent, his or her legal representative has had the opportunity, in a prior interview with a medical doctor who is the investigator or a member of the investigating team, to understand the objectives, risks and inconveniences of the clinical trial, and the conditions under which it is to be conducted and has also been informed of the right to withdraw from the clinical trial at any time without any resulting detriment;
Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 3 3. Any subject or his legal representative may, without any resulting detriment, withdraw from the clinical trial at any time by revoking his or her informed consent. The withdrawal of consent shall not affect the activities carried out based on consent before its withdrawal.
source: PE-506.160
|
| 7 |
2012/0366(COD) Tobacco and related products: manufacture, presentation and sale. Approximation of Member States legislation
2013/05/14
ENVI
5 amendments...
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (4) ‘characterising flavour’ means a distinguishable aroma or taste other than tobacco, resulting from an additive or combination of additives, including but not limited to fruit, spice, herb, alcohol
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 Amendment 533 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall prohibit the use of flavourings in the components of tobacco products such as filters, papers, packages
Amendment 971 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall also ensure that cigarette products, destined to or placed on the Union market, are manufactured in such a complex way to safeguard the final product against counterfeiting. Security features in this sense are: (a) cigarette paper; (b) tipping paper; (c) watermarks; (c) perforation; (d) rotogravure printing (e) multicolour printing.
source: PE-510.713
2013/05/21
ENVI
2 amendments...
Amendment 825 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) suggests that a particular tobacco product is less harmful than others or has vitalising, energetic, healing, rejuvenating
Amendment 913 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 3.
source: PE-510.717
|
| 3 |
2012/2000(BUD) 2013 budget: priorities - section III, Commission
2012/02/16
BUDG
3 amendments...
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that the promotion of growth
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Is therefore extremely worried about the situation of payments in 2012 and calls for a Commission proposal so that a solution
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Takes note of the letter dated 23 January 2012 from the Commissioner for Budgets and Financial Programming expressing the Commission’s willingness to reduce the number of posts in its establishment plans by 1 % as early as 2013 taking carefully into account the different effects for large, medium-sized and small directorates; recalls the Commission’s intention of reducing the staffing in EU institutions and bodies by 5 % as compared to 2013 by 2018, and recalls that this is to be seen as an overall goal; considers that any short-
source: PE-480.884
|
| 1 |
2012/2006(BUD) 2013 budget: estimates of revenue and expenditure - section I, Parliament
2012/09/03
BUDG
1 amendments...
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Takes note of the increased activities of Members in non-legislative work as laid down in the Rules of Procedures which ties considerable Parliament's resources and those of other EU Institutions; asks the Bureau and the Secretary-General for an analysis of this fact before the adoption of Parliament's budget 2013 and to present options on how to limit this increased burden;
source: PE-483.863
|
| 3 |
2012/2016(BUD) 2013 budget: mandate for trilogue
2012/05/31
BUDG
3 amendments...
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines that European policies and programmes are key elements in order to achieve the Europe 2020 targets, notes that climate action and environmental objectives are of a cross-cutting nature which must be translated into concrete actions to be implemented under the various programmes and policies to foster sustainable growth;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Notes that climate action and environmental objectives are a priority
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 64 64. Stresses the importance of pilot projects and preparatory actions as key tools for the formulation of political priorities and for paving the way for new long-term initiatives both at regional and EU level that might turn into EU activities and programmes improving the lives of EU citizens; intends to proceed to the identification of a balanced package of PP- PAs based on the Commission's assessment and recommendations and carefully considering the sustainability and durability of the aimed results produced;
source: PE-489.697
|
| 8 |
2012/2092(BUD) 2013 general budget: all sections
2012/07/25
ENVI
7 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 2 2. Notes that climate action and environmental objectives are of a cross- cutting nature which must be translated into concrete actions to be implemented under the various programmes and policies to foster sustainable growth in Europe; welcomes the recurrent commitment by all EU institutions for a more sustainable, smart, resource-efficient and ecological European economy; is worried, however, that the present economic and fiscal constraints in some Member States lead to negligence of achieving climate action and environmental objectives;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 4 4. Is aware that the 201
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 7 7. Observes a decrease of EUR 61 million of operational appropriations proposed under Title 17 for
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 9 9. Is generally concerned on the level of payment appropriations; points out that the slow start of 2007-2013 programmes resulted in a low level of payment needs during the first half of the programming period; stresses that commitments made in the past need to be paid in the final year of the current financial period; reminds Member States in this context on their political and budgetary commitment which needs to be converted into payment appropriations for the successful implementation of programmes and measures in the area of environment, public health and food safety; will therefore reinstate the payment levels as proposed the Draft Budget 2013;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 11 11. Stresses that the successful implementation and monitoring of legislation needs sufficient and skilled administrative support; reminds that the Public Health Programme is implemented mainly by the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC); is concerned that the freeze or even reduction of administrative expenditure will have a negative impact on the quality of Commission's activities;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 15 15. Notes that the Draft Budget foresees a reduction of the ECDC establishment plan by two and for the EFSA by four posts; recognises at the same time that the EEA receives two additional posts which need to be budgetary neutral achieved by a reduction of two national experts and two contract agents; is aware that 36 additional posts are foreseen for ECHA of which 16 posts will be financed from additional fees as well as 21 posts for EMA; is in this context concerned that the recruitment of staff needs to be postponed when the fee income is lower than estimated for 2013;
source: PE-494.517
2012/08/10
BUDG
1 amendments...
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 66 a (new) 66a. Is aware that certain agencies have to implement additional tasks in 2013 which might not be reflected in the allocated budget or establishment plan for 2013; requests from the Commission, in case of necessity, to propose timely an Amending Budget for the respective agency; expects from the Commission further to present a new financial statement when a legislative procedure has been finalised by the Parliament and Council extending the mandate of an agency; is alert that such an extension might require additional resources which need to be agreed upon by the budgetary authority;
source: PE-497.798
|
| 1 |
2013/0045(CNS) Implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of financial transaction tax (FTT)
2013/04/10
BUDG
1 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 a (new) (24a) This Directive does not address the management of revenue from FTT. However, having regard the Commission proposal for a Council Decision on own resources of June 2011 as well as the European Parliament's resolution of 13 March 20131 on European Council conclusions of 7/8 February concerning the MFF revenues from FTT should be allocated at least partly to the EU budget as a genuine own resource. The use of part of revenue from FTT as Union genuine own resources would reduce proportionally national GNI based contributions to the Union budget of the participating Member States and would therefore release funds from the national budgets for other uses. ___________ 1 P7_TA-PROV(2013)0078
source: PE-508.244
|
Jutta HAUG on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
Term 6 20.07.2004 - 13.07.2009
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |