Jarosław Leszek WAŁĘSA
Constituencies
-
Poland
Platforma Obywatelska
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Groups
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Fisheries | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Member of | Committee on Petitions | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on International Trade | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Japan | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://jaroslawwalesa.pl
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45304
- Fax
- +322 28 49304
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 10E115
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75304
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79304
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T11029
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Parlament Europejski
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 10E115
- B-1047 Bruksela
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2012/0285(COD) | Conservation of fishery through technical measures in the Baltic Sea, the Belts and the Sound: aligning the Regulation with the TFEU; Commission delegated and implementing powers |
| Shadow | 2012/0236(COD) | Long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks: management |
| Responsible | 2012/0077(COD) | Conservation of fishery resources: cod stocks in the Baltic Sea, multi-annual plan; aligning the Regulation with the TFEU |
| Opinion | 2011/2107(INI) | Green Paper: From challenges to opportunities: towards a common strategic framework for EU research and innovation funding |
| Shadow | 2011/0257(NLE) | EC/Guinea-Bissau Fisheries Partnership Agreement: protocol for the period from 16 June 2011 to 15 June 2012 |
| Shadow | 2010/0129(NLE) | EU/Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway Agreements: Financial Mechanisms 2009-2014 and imports of certain fish and fisheries products 2009-2014 |
| Responsible | 2010/0042(NLE) | Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries 1978: amendments |
Born
1976/09/13 Gdańsk- Bachelor of Arts (2000).
- Researcher (information manager) (2000). Analyst (2001-2002). Assistant (2003-2005).
- Member of the Civic Platform (PO) National Executive (2006).
- Member of the Sejm (2005-2009).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 1 |
2009/2107(INI) A new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture
2010/04/14
PECH
1 amendments...
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to propose specific sustainable criteria in relation to the well-
source: PE-439.917
|
| 4 |
2009/2214(INI) Sustainable EU policy for the High North
2010/11/16
AFET
4 amendments...
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that three EU Member States are Arctic States, acknowledges that the EU has no Arctic Ocean coastline, but reaffirms the legitimate interest of the EU as a stakeholder by virtue of its rights and obligations under international law, its commitment to environmental, climate and other policies and its funding, research activities and economic interests, including shipping and the exploitation of natural resources;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Acknowledges that the EU, like other developed areas of the world, may contribute
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Emphasises that, in order to objectively determine the nature and rate of the changes occurring in the natural environment of the Arctic, it is vital that international teams of scientists be given full access to carry out research in this particularly sensitive area of our planet; points out that the EU is stepping up its presence and involvement, particularly in the European sector of the Arctic, by building joint infrastructure for research and increasing the number of research programmes carried out in the Arctic; takes the view that these activities could be developed further by setting up research teams made up of scientists from many different fields and representing all the countries involved; takes the view that this research should be open and not restricted along territorial or national lines, because it is in the interests of and for use by the international community as a whole;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Requests the Commission to put forward proposals as to how the Galileo Project or projects that have an impact on the Arctic could be developed to enable safer and faster navigation in Arctic waters, thus investing in the safety and accessibility of the North-East Passage in particular, to contribute to better predictability of ice movements
source: PE-452.805
|
| 5 |
2009/2238(INI) Arrangements for importing fishery and aquaculture products into the EU with a view to the future reform of the CFP
2010/06/05
INTA
5 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that fish is a natural resource which, under proper management, can be renewable and provide both food and jobs around the world
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that fish should
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises the need for all imports to meet the same health standards as
source: PE-441.238
|
| 1 |
2010/0042(NLE) Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries 1978: amendments
2010/03/09
PECH, PECH
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
1a. Requests the Council and the Commission to set up, before negotiations are opened relating to the revision of provisions in the framework of the Regional Fisheries organisations to be carried out by the EU, the schemes necessary to ensure the appropriate participation by the Parliament's observers therein;
source: PE-448.665
|
| 1 |
2010/0816(NLE) European External Action Service EEAS: organisation and functioning
2010/01/07
AFET
1 amendments...
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act Article 6 – paragraph 6 6.
source: PE-443.165
|
| 2 |
2010/2272(INI) Mobility and inclusion of people with disabilities and the European Disability Strategy 2010-2020
2011/05/18
PETI
2 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the petitioners
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses th
source: PE-464.797
|
| 5 |
2011/0194(COD) Common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products
2012/04/13
PECH
5 amendments...
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3 – distributing landed products
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1(a) a fishery producer organisation is deemed representative where it accounts for at least
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 4a (new) 4a. The provisions of this article shall not apply to aquaculture producer organisations.
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Description of the goods European sprat (Sprattus sprattus)
source: PE-487.716
|
| 11 |
2011/0195(COD) Common Fisheries Policy
2012/06/25
PECH
11 amendments...
Amendment 625 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 2 2. The Common Fisheries Policy shall apply the precautionary
Amendment 662 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 4 4. The Common Fisheries Policy shall
Amendment 707 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) provide conditions for efficient fishing activities within an economically viable and competitive fishing industry, bearing in mind the role of small-scale fisheries in preserving the social fabric of coastal areas;
Amendment 1106 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 7 a (new) Article 7 a Establishment of fish stock recovery areas 1. Member States shall establish, by 2020, fish stock recovery areas in which all or certain fishing activities are prohibited 2. Member States shall establish areas referred to in paragraph 1 on the basis of best scientific advice available with regard to i.a. nursery and spawning grounds for fish stocks targeted by fishing activities to be prohibited and shall notify the Commission of these areas. 3. If a fishing vessel is transiting through a fish stock recovery area, it shall ensure that all gears carried on board that are used for fishing for the species to which the recovery area applies are lashed and stowed, during the transit. 4. Member States having a direct fishing interest in the areas to be affected by measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall cooperate with one another in accordance with Article 21 paragraph 1a[1]. Any of such Member States may request that measures referred to in paragraph 1 are adopted by the Commission. 5. When acting upon the request referred to in paragraph 8, the Commission shall receive from the requesting Member State and other Member States having a direct fishing interest all relevant information on the measures required, including rationale, scientific data and detail on practical implementation. The Commission shall adopt the measures taking into account any relevant scientific advice available to it
Amendment 1387 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States are authorized to adopt measures applicable to waters under their sovereignty and jurisdiction that are necessary to comply with their obligations under the relevant Union law concerning the protection of the marine environment. Such measures shall be compatible with the objectives set out in Article 2 and no less stringent than the existing Union legislation.
Amendment 1389 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 12 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Member States having a direct fishing interest in the areas to be affected by measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall cooperate with one another in accordance with Article 21 paragraph 1a[1]. Any of such Member States may request that measures referred to in paragraph 1 are adopted by the Commission.
Amendment 1390 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 12 – paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. When acting upon the request referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission shall receive from the requesting Member State and other Member States having a direct fishing interest all relevant information on the measures required, including rationale, scientific data and detail on practical implementation. The Commission shall adopt the measures taking into account any relevant scientific advice available to it.
Amendment 1391 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 12 – paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. The Union shall take measures to reduce the possible negative social and economic consequences of adopting measures referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 1543 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 2 2. Minimum conservation reference sizes based on the best available scientific advice shall be established for the fish stocks set out in paragraph 1. The first sales of catches of such fish stocks below the minimum conservation reference size shall be
Amendment 1568 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure
Amendment 1619 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Each Member State shall decide, for vessels flying its flag, on the method of allocating the fishing opportunities assigned to that Member State in accordance with Community law. It shall inform the Commission of the allocation method.
source: PE-491.358
|
| 19 |
2011/0206(COD) Fish stock conservation: multiannual plan for the Baltic salmon stock
2012/04/16
ENVI
3 amendments...
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. Stocking shall be conducted in a way that safeguards the genetic diversity of the different salmon river stocks taking into account existing fish communities in the stocked river and in neighbouring rivers while maximising the effect of stocking. Smolt shall originate from the nearest possible wild salmon river.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) da) smolt originates from the nearest possible wild salmon river.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – point b b) compliance with the rules on quota uptake, activity authorisation and catch declaration by service vessels and recreational fisheries using all types of gear;
source: PE-486.132
2012/12/06
PECH
16 amendments...
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The Implementation Plan agreed by the World Summit on Sustainable Development at Johannesburg in 2002 states that all commercial stocks for which it is possible to do so should be restored to levels that can produce maximum sustainable yield by 2015. ICES deems, on the basis of the real prerequisites for sustainable growth, that for the Baltic salmon river stocks this level corresponds to a smolt production level between 60% and 75 % of the potential smolt production capacity for the different wild salmon rivers. Such scientific advice should constitute the basis for setting the objectives and targets of the multiannual plan. In duly justified cases, consideration could be given to setting higher target production levels for individual rivers.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Scientific advice states that inappropriate stocking procedures may have significant implications on the genetic diversity of the Baltic salmon stock
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) However,
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16)
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) To ensure that salmon catches are not misreported as sea trout and hence escape proper control,
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. For wild salmon rivers which have reached 50% of the potential smolt production capacity by the time of the entry into force of this Regulation, the wild smolt production shall reach 75% of the potential smolt production capacity for each river in
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. For wild salmon rivers which have not reached 50% of the potential smolt production capacity by the time of the entry into force of this Regulation, the wild smolt production shall reach 50% of the potential smolt production capacity for each river in
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. After
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The annual TAC for the salmon stocks at sea shall not exceed the level corresponding to a fishing mortality rate of 0.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Smolts for stocking shall be marked by clipping their adipose fins.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) Smolts for stocking shall be marked by clipping their adipose fins.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 By way of derogation from Article 14 of Regulation 1224/2009 masters of European Union fishing vessels o
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 By way of derogation from the introductory sentence of Article 17(1) of Regulation 1224/2009, masters of European Union fishing vessels o
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 Member States concerned shall verify the accuracy of the information recorded in the catch declarations by landing inspections. Such landing inspections shall cover a minimum of
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 The Commission shall, on the basis of the reporting by Member States as referred to in Article 23 of this Regulation and on the basis of scientific advice, evaluate the impact of the management measures on the Baltic salmon stock and on the fisheries exploiting that stock in the year following that in which it receives the Member States reports. The Commission shall take into account the evaluation of the ban on the use of driftnets.
source: PE-491.237
|
| 2 |
2011/0217(COD) European Year of Citizens (2013)
2012/02/03
PETI
2 amendments...
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 21 a (new) (21 a) In the context of the planned European Year of Citizens (2013), appropriate measures should also be taken to prevent and condemn all forms of intolerance, discrimination, humiliation and xenophobia affecting citizens who exercise their right to free movement and who travel, settle and work in the Union.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 2 – indent 3 a (new) - to raise Unions citizens' and authorities' awareness on the appropriate measures to prevent and condemn all forms of intolerance, discrimination, humiliation and xenophobia affecting citizens who exercise their right to free movement and who travel, settle and work in the Union; to encourage the defence of fundamental rights, freedoms and European values and combat all forms of extremisms, as well as for the European Commission, as a guardian of the Treaties, to intervene in the circumstances where such situations occur in order to prevent the division of the European citizens into two categories.
source: PE-483.770
|
| 2 |
2011/0302(COD) Connecting Europe Facility
2012/09/20
REGI
2 amendments...
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: EUR 31 694 000 000, out of which EUR 10 000 000 000 shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent
source: PE-496.462
|
| 5 |
2011/0344(COD) Rights and Citizenship Programme 2014-2020
2012/05/25
PETI
5 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) EU Citizens should be able to exercise fully the rights deriving from the citizenship of the Union. They should be able to exercise their right to move and reside freely in the Union, their right to vote for and stand as a candidate in European Parliament and municipal elections, their right to consular protection and their right to petition the European Parliament. They should feel at ease about living, travelling and working in another Member State, trusting that their rights are protected, no matter where in the Union they happen to be.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) EU Citizens and businesses should also benefit fully from the internal market. Consumers should be able to enjoy the rights deriving from the consumer legislation and businesses should be supported to exercise the freedom to conduct business in the internal market. The development of contract and consumer legislative instruments provides practical solutions for businesses and consumers to address cross-border problems, aiming to offer them more choices and to make it less costly for them to conclude contracts with partners in another Member State, while providing a high level of consumer protection.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) to promote the effective implementation of the principles of non discrimination on the grounds of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, including equality between women and men and the rights of persons with disabilities and of the elderly as well as to combat all forms of extremism;
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. to focus on better and adequately funded communication both at national and local level.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. to identify and eliminate obstacles and barriers restricting access by the disabled to benefit from EU citizens rights.
source: PE-489.636
|
| 66 |
2011/0380(COD) European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) 2014-2020
2013/01/17
PECH
66 amendments...
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) It is paramount to better integrate environmental concerns into the CFP which should deliver on the objectives and targets of the Union's environmental policy and the Europe 2020 Strategy. The CFP is aimed at an exploitation of living marine biological resources that restores and maintains fish stocks at levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield, by 2015 wherever possible, and not later than 20
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) Investment in human capital is also vital to increase the competitiveness and economic performance of fishing and maritime activities. Therefore, the EMFF should support lifelong learning, vocational training, young people’s access to careers in fishing, co-
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37)
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) In line with the discard ban introduced by the CFP, the EMFF should support investments on board aiming at make the best use of unwanted fish caught and valorise underused components of the fish caught. Considering the scarcity of the resources, in order to maximise the value of the fish caught, the EMFF should also support investments on board aiming at adding commercial value to fish caught.
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 6 (6) 'fisherman' means any person
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b (b) diversification of marine fisheries
Amendment 705 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Measures covered by Title VI
Amendment 792 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 802 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 843 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. A maximum of 30% of the resources allocated under Article 16 shall be used to fund the Integrated Maritime Policy referred to in Title V Chapter VIII.
Amendment 848 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new) Resources to fund the Integrated Maritime Policy shall not exceed 7% of the EMFF’s total budgetary resources
Amendment 850 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) the level of employment in fisheries
Amendment 854 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) the level of production in fisheries and aquaculture
Amendment 865 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iv (iv) the available data collection resources compared to the extent of the data collection tasks of the Member State, where available means are approximated to the
Amendment 868 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) As regards all measures, the historical allocations and consumption of funds under Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 in the period 2007-2013 and the historical consumption under Council Regulation (EC) No 861/2006..
Amendment 869 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) As regards aquaculture measures, historical allocations should be increased in line with the aims of the Common Fisheries Policy to ensure the development of a sustainable and competitive European aquaculture sector, including freshwater aquaculture.
Amendment 1484 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) in equipment as referred to in Article 3
Amendment 1486 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) on
Amendment 1490 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) on investments improving the value or quality of the fish caught as referred to in Article 40 and under the conditions set out in that Article.
Amendment 1492 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The EMFF may provide support for investments relating to start-up for young fishermen as referred to in Article 32b and under the same conditions as set out in that Article except for the requirement under Article 32b (2)(b).
Amendment 1494 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) References made in Articles 33, 3
Amendment 1496 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) References made in Article 3
Amendment 1499 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 3 3. In order to sustain diversification by inland fishermen, the EMFF may support the
Amendment 1502 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 4 4. For the purposes of paragraph 3, references made in Article 32 and Article 32a to fishing vessels shall be understood as references to vessels operating exclusively in inland water.
Amendment 1503 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. In order to stimulate innovativeness, competitiveness and environmental sustainability of inland fishing, the EMFF may support the development and facilitation of new innovations under the conditions of Articles 28 and 36 of this Regulation and the advisory services in inland fishing under the conditions of Article 29 of this Regulation. Furthermore, the EMFF may support the networking between scientist and fishermen and promoting of human capital and social dialogue under the conditions of Article 30 and 31 of this regulation, respectively.
Amendment 1505 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 5 5. In order to protect and develop aquatic fauna and flora, the EMFF may support
Amendment 1507 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 5 – point a (new) (a) the management, restoration and monitoring of inland fisheries areas, including NATURA 2000 sites, which are affected by fishing activities and the rehabilitation of inland waters in line with Directive 60/2000/EU, including spawning grounds and migration routes for migratory species, without prejudice of Article 38(1)(d);
Amendment 1508 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 5 – point b (new) (b) the construction, modernization or installation of static or movable facilities intended to protect and enhance aquatic fauna and flora including their scientific preparation, monitoring and evaluation;
Amendment 1509 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 5 – point c (new) (c) Investments to improve fish control activities; development and installation of control systems
Amendment 1521 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 1. Support under this Chapter shall
Amendment 1528 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Entrepreneurs entering the sector for the purpose of this Article shall provide a business plan and, where the cost of investments is more than 50,000 euros a feasibility study.
Amendment 1533 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 2 2. Where operations consist of investments in equipment or infrastructure ensuring compliance with requirements on the environment, human or animal health, hygiene or animal welfare under Union law,
Amendment 1538 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In order to stimulate innovation in aquaculture, the EMFF may support
Amendment 1541 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 1547 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) developing or introducing in the market new or substantially improved products
Amendment 1551 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) exploring the technical or economic feasibility of innovations, products or processes.
Amendment 1556 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 2. Operations under this Article
Amendment 1566 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – title Amendment 1572 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 1578 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point a (new) (a) productive investments in aquaculture;
Amendment 1581 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point b (new) (b) diversification of aquaculture production and species cultured;
Amendment 1584 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point c (new) (c) modernization of aquaculture units including improvement in working and safety conditions of aquaculture workers;
Amendment 1588 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point d (new) (d) improvements and modernization related to animal health and welfare including the purchase of equipment aiming at protecting the farms from wild predators;
Amendment 1590 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point e (new) (e) reducing negative impact or enhancing positive effects on the environment and increasing resource efficiency;
Amendment 1593 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point f (new) (f) investments in enhancing quality of aquaculture product;.
Amendment 1596 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point g (new) (g) restoration of existing aquaculture ponds or lagoons through removal of silt, or possible measures aimed at the prevention of silt deposit;
Amendment 1598 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Support under paragraph 1 may be given for the increase in production and or modernization of existing aquaculture enterprises or the construction of new ones provided that the development is consistent with the multi annual national strategic plan for the development of Aquaculture.
Amendment 1808 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 3 3. Support shall only be granted for aquaculture stock insurance contracts or mutual funds which cover economic losses under paragraph 1 exceeding 30% of the average annual production of the aquaculture farmer.
Amendment 1866 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) supporting diversification and job creation in fisheries areas, in particular in other maritime sectors and improving working conditions in fisheries areas;
Amendment 2017 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) d a) for the improvement of working conditions;
Amendment 2025 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) d b) for the improvement and monitoring of public health, hygiene conditions or product quality;
Amendment 2031 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d c (new) d c) for the production of high-quality products for niche markets;
Amendment 2035 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d d (new) d d) for the production or placing on the market of new products, the use of new technologies or the development of innovative production methods;
Amendment 2038 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d e (new) d e) placing on the market of products originating mainly from local ? and local aquaculture.
Amendment 2122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 79 a (new) Article 79a Specific objectives 1. The aim of the funding provided for under this Chapter shall be to support the development and implementation of the Integrated Maritime Policy, including: (a) integrated maritime surveillance (IMS), in particular the development of the Common Information Sharing Environment (CISE), (b) promoting the protection of the marine environment, in particular its biodiversity and protected marine areas such as Natura 2000 areas, beyond what is stipulated in Article 35, and the sustainable use of marine and coastal resources, and specifying the limits of sustainable human activities which affect the marine environment in line with the Marine Strategy Framework Directive; (c ) marine spatial planning and integrated coastal zone management; (d) promoting an integrated approach to maritime affairs and increased awareness of maritime affairs among the public, public bodies and the private sector. 2. The modification of an operational programme shall not result in any changes to the allocation of resources referred to in Article 15(7)
Amendment 2124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 79 b (new) Article 79b Eligible operations 1. Support may be granted under the EMFF for operations which comply with the objectives set out in Article 79a, such as: (a) actions which allow the objectives of integrated maritime surveillance to be achieved, in particular the CISE objectives; (b) protection of the marine environment, in particular its biodiversity and protected marine areas, such as Natura 2000 areas in line with the obligations arising under Directives 92/43/EEC and 2009/14/EC; (c) gathering more information about the state of the marine environment in order to put in place the monitoring programmes and funding provided for under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, in line with the requirements set out in this Directive; (d) actions which promote the development and implementation of marine spatial planning and integrated coastal zone management; (e) information and promotion activities. 2. The remuneration of persons employed in national administrations shall not be deemed an eligible operational cost.
Amendment 2200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 92 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the establishment of national networks aiming at disseminating information, capacity building, exchanging best practice and supporting cooperation between the FLAGs
Amendment 2201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 92 – paragraph 3 Amendment 2222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 1 1. Member States
Amendment 2224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States
Amendment 2230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) the operation is related to premiums under Article 33A, or Article 33B and compensations under Article 53, 54 or 55.
Amendment 2233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (db) the operation is related to the integrated maritime policy measures referred to in Article 79 ter.
Amendment 2236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may apply an intensity of public aid between 50% and maximum 100% of the total eligible expenditure when the operation is implemented under Chapter I
Amendment 2237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 3 – point b Amendment 2238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) public access to the results of the operation
Amendment 2239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 3 – point d source: PE-496.422
|
| 1 |
2011/0455(COD) Staff Regulations of European Union officials: amendment of the Regulations
2012/03/20
JURI
1 amendments...
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 9 Staff Regulations Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b 9. In Article 29
source: PE-483.851
|
| 1 |
2011/2069(INI) Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union (2010-2011)
2012/09/07
PETI
1 amendments...
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Section 1 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Member States to ensure effective implementation of the Directive on equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin1 as well as relevant legislation on equal treatment between women and men2; 1 2000/43/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin. 2 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services; 2006/54/EC on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation.
source: PE-492.847
|
| 1 |
2011/2107(INI) Green Paper: From challenges to opportunities: towards a common strategic framework for EU research and innovation funding
2011/06/21
ITRE
1 amendments...
Amendment 336 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls for consolidation of multidisciplinary research and recognition of the social dimension of research; in this context, recalls that great societal challenges (such as climate change, demographic
source: PE-467.208
|
| 4 |
2011/2182(INI) EU Citizenship Report 2010: dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens’ rights
2012/01/20
PETI
4 amendments...
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) K a. whereas a number of petitions are tabled by people with disabilities, who everyday encounter many barriers preventing them from benefiting from EU citizens rights, i.e. normal use of the education system, access to insurance or lack of public transport facilities and draws attention to the need of a coherent system in the EU determining the degree of disability, the lack of which can frequently lead to social exclusion;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Repeats its previous calls to the Member States to ensure freedom of movement for all EU citizens and their families
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to pay more attention and respond more precisely to the numerous petitions received on the mutual recognition of civil-status documents and of their effects10 and therefore highlights the importance of making progress as quickly as possible towards ensuring the mutual recognition of the status of same- sex marriages
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20 a. Stresses that the public authorities have a duty to identify, and eliminate, obstacles and barriers restricting access by the disabled to benefit from EU citizens rights i.e. facilities and services available to the public at large, including transport, public institutions and places, public education and information, using means of communication appropriate to the type of disability concerned and without delays or extra costs
source: PE-480.601
|
| 2 |
2011/2297(INI) Implementation of EU water legislation, ahead of a necessary overall approach to European water challenges
2012/03/30
PETI
2 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Declares that water is a shared resource of humankind and a public good and therefore should not be a source of profit from trade, and that access to water should constitute a fundamental and universal right; stresses that the sustainable use of water is an environmental and health necessity that plays a fundamental role in the climate regulation cycle; reiterates that ‘the management of water resources should not be subject to internal market rules’ (EP Resolution P5_TA (2004)0183) and invites the European Commission to review the relevant legislation, particularly that on public procurement and concessions, so as to guarantee public ownership and management of water and water utilities, and its proper distribution;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Draws attention to the existence of certain activities denounced by the petitioners, including waste landfills, agriculture and industry, which produce a great impact on the environment and human health and are responsible for poor water quality; calls therefore for the abandonment of subsidies which undermine incentives for efficient water management by creating overuse, and to free up funds for targeted subsidies – in particular for poor and rural populations – aimed at affordable access for all and the distribution of water in areas facing shortages, particularly those areas situated at a distance from large urban agglomerations equipped with water infrastructure;
source: PE-486.133
|
| 1 |
2011/2317(INI) Annual Report of the activities of the Committee on Petitions 2011
2012/05/24
PETI
1 amendments...
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes Parliament’s decision to develop a much more practical and visible petitions portal on its website, which will facilitate access for citizens to the petitions process, provide them with information and allow them to submit petitions in a more user-friendly environment; considers that this portal should also provide practical links to other forms of redress which are available at European and national or regional level and at the same time set a framework of practices for public administrations based on the CURIA portal, the official portal of ECJ judgments;
source: PE-489.586
|
| 16 |
2011/2318(INI) External dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy
2012/04/04
INTA
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Maintains that the EU should establish a stronger presence in international and regional fisheries organisations; insists on the key role of the Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs), and stresses the need to improve their functioning and decision-making; invites the EU to actively promote enhanced compliance by parties with a view to strengthened sustainability; underlines the need to increase the role of Regional Advisory Committees (RACs), which have a substantial practical knowledge of fish and should play an important role in the process of concluding bilateral agreements and a new generation of agreements on sustainable fisheries management.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Reminds that due to the different legislations of many trade EU partners, the issue of rules of origin and its cumulation are controversial and sensitive matters in trade negotiations; therefore calls on the European Commission to pay a specific attention on it and negotiate balanced solutions which do not penalize the EU Fishery sectors
source: PE-486.231
2012/08/05
PECH
14 amendments...
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas quotas in RFMOs are primarily based on historical catches, which maintains
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas there is in many cases insufficient data on fish stocks that the EU is fishing, in terms of their status and of total
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the size of the EU market for fish and the geographical range of activities by EU-flagged and EU-owned vessels impose a high level of responsibility on the Union for ensuring that its fisheries' footprint is ecologically sustainable, providing high quality seafood to consumers in Europe and other countries where European fish are marketed, and
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Urges the Commission to drive forward the global and multilateral agenda promoting sustainable fisheries worldwide, while transforming its dialogues with key countries such as the US, Russia, Japan and China, into effective partnerships to address crucial issues such as the eradication of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing and the strengthening of high seas control and governance;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 – point 1 (new) (1) Encourages the Commission to secure a fair share of the surplus to the European Union as a privileged partner, taking into account the fishing needs of the local flee, avoiding disruption of fishing activities and hence creating conditions discouraging the re-flagging of EU vessels;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Encourages the Commission in its endeavours to obtain complete and reliable data from the coastal State on the total amount of
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Reaffirms that EU vessels should not compete with local fishermen for the same resources, hence stressing the need for an accurate calculation of the surplus;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Believes that the EU must make increased efforts to help provide the coastal States with which it negotiates bilateral agreements with sufficient data and information for reliable stock assessments, and that providing funding for a scientific research vessel in regions where the EU fleet is active would considerably strengthen scientific analyses on fish stocks, which is a prerequisite for any
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Expresses the wish that targeted scientific and technical cooperation in general should be strengthened in
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Believes that RFMOs must develop management systems that provide for an equitable and fair resource allocation based
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 – indent 1 – be preceded by environmental and social impact assessments with respect to the threat of over-exploitation of resources,
source: PE-489.341
|
| 3 |
2012/0077(COD) Conservation of fishery resources: cod stocks in the Baltic Sea, multi-annual plan; aligning the Regulation with the TFEU
2012/10/16
PECH
3 amendments...
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Scientific data indicate that target mortality rates are no longer appropriate and therefore these rates should be revised in conformity with the best scientific advice available.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) In order to achieve in an efficient way the targets set out in Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007 and be able to react swiftly to changes in stock conditions or in fishery, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 5 Regulation (EC) 1098/2007 Article 27 source: PE-497.931
|
| 1 |
2012/0236(COD) Long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks: management
2013/02/27
PECH
1 amendments...
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 Article 11a – paragraph 1 – point c c. during that trip the fishing vessel concerned has on
source: PE-506.056
|
| 2 |
2012/2024(INI) Law of Administrative procedure of the European Union
2012/07/05
PETI
2 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Notes that the Staff Regulations lay down general rules on conflicts of interest as regards when an official must inform his/her superiors, etc., but these would need to be complemented with rules governing the consequences, such as the possible revocation of decisions taken in violation of the rules on conflicts of interests, as well as the establishment of a deadline for enforcement of all decisions, in order to ensure the predictability of administrative processes;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Considers that EU citizens should expect a high level of transparency from the Commission, regardless of whether they are making a formal complaint or exercising their right of petition under the Treaty, together with information as to the possibility of their taking any further action in the matter.
source: PE-488.048
|
| 4 |
2012/2043(INI) EU Strategy for the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2012-2015
2012/04/19
PETI
4 amendments...
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, in their petitions, European citizens strongly protest against bullfights and other spectacles that
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that the European Animal Welfare Framework Law should include measures to solve the stray animal problem, which is particularly serious in the EU’s southern and eastern Member States, and urges that EU funding be provided for the implementation of effective sterilisation and castration measures; calls on the European Union and the Member States to ratify the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals and to transpose its provisions in national legal systems;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Points to the concern among European citizens, expressed through their petitions to Parliament, about abuse of un-stunned slaughtering in EU; calls on the Member states to ensure more effective enforcement of the legislation while guaranteeing the derogation for un-stunned slaughter on
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls for better information of consumers about the methods of production of animal products or animal by-products and their impact on the welfare of animals in the form of transparent and adequate labelling and package leaflets and mandatory inclusion of information on animals’ countries of origin;
source: PE-487.812
|
| 5 |
2012/2104(INI) Improving the delivery of benefits from EU environment measures: building confidence through better knowledge and responsiveness
2012/11/14
PETI
5 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Urges the Member States to balance the needs of a healthy economy with those of the sustainable environment; emphasises that local communities must have a strong say in deciding the best balance between the
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that the
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the overwhelming need to develop new energy production capacities in the EU, invest in the technology and alternative ways of producing energy; recognises that this cannot be done without some impact on the environment, and urges the
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that high standards of information and transparency concerning environmental legislation and the application of EU rules are essential to ensure that EU environmental policy meets with the citizens' consent and enhance their cooperation with local authorities;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Urges the Commission to find ways of better reconciling its environmental policies with the Common Fisheries Policy and the Common Agricultural Policy
source: PE-500.498
|
| 2 |
2012/2151(INI) Towards a genuine Economic and Monetary Union
2012/09/26
ECON
2 amendments...
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Recital AT AT. whereas European supervision of financial institutions within the euro area is an absolute priority to take measures to tackle the crisis, it should be, however, ensured that, for the purpose of internal financial market stability, countries whose currency is not the euro, which decide to access the single supervision mechanism, should be granted a participation formula, which guarantees symmetric relations between accepted obligations and impact on decision-making;
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Recital AT a (new) ATa. whereas the consequences of the establishment of a euro area supervisory authority on non-euro area Member States should be taken into account;
source: PE-496.545
|
Jarosław Leszek WAŁĘSA on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |