Jacqueline FOSTER
Constituencies
-
United Kingdom
Conservative Party
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
United Kingdom
Conservative and Unionist Party
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
United Kingdom
Conservative and Unionist Party
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
Groups
-
ECR
Member
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Transport and Tourism | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union | 2009/09/16 | 2012/10/22 |
| Member of | Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean | 2009/09/16 | 2012/10/22 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 2002/02/06 | 2004/07/19 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 1999/09/14 | 2002/01/14 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 1999/09/14 | 2002/01/14 |
| Member of | Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) | 2002/02/06 | 2004/07/19 |
Contact
Online
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45674
- Fax
- +322 28 49674
- Office
- Bât. Willy Brandt 06M113
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75674
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79674
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T11044
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- European Parliament
- Rue Wiertz
- Willy Brandt 06M113
- B-1047 Brussels
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2013/0072(COD) | Air transport: enforcement of passenger rights; air carrier liability limits |
| Shadow | 2012/2299(INI) | EU's External Aviation Policy - Addressing future challenges |
| Responsible | 2012/2005(INI) | Implementation of the Single European Sky legislation |
| Shadow | 2012/0361(COD) | Aviation safety: occurrence reporting in civil aviation |
| Shadow | 2012/0213(NLE) | EU/European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol) Agreement: enhanced cooperation |
| Shadow | 2012/0018(NLE) | EU/Sri Lanka Agreement: air services |
| Shadow | 2011/2150(INI) | Functioning and application of established rights of people travelling by air |
| Shadow | 2011/0398(COD) | Noise-related operating restrictions at Union airports: rules and procedures |
| Opinion | 2011/0392(COD) | European satellite navigation systems: implementation and exploitation 2014-2020 |
| Shadow | 2011/0391(COD) | Allocation of slots at EU airports: common rules. Recast |
| Shadow | 2011/0050(NLE) | EU/International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) agreement: Memorandum of Cooperation |
| Shadow | 2010/2208(INI) | Transport applications of the Global Navigation Satellite Systems - short and medium term EU policy |
| Shadow | 2010/2207(INI) | International Air Agreements under the Treaty of Lisbon |
| Shadow | 2010/0143(NLE) | EU/Brazil Agreement: civil aviation safety |
| Shadow | 2010/0112(NLE) | EC/USA Air Transport Agreement: Protocol to amend the Agreement |
| Shadow | 2009/0170(COD) | Civil aviation safety: investigation and prevention of accidents and incidents (repeal. Directive 94/56/EC) |
| Shadow | 2009/0115(NLE) | EC/Brazil Agreement: air services |
| Shadow | 2009/0063(COD) | Air transport: aviation security charges |
| Shadow | 2009/0005(COD) | Maritime transport: formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from Member State ports (repeal. Directive 2002/6/EC) |
| Shadow | 2008/0161(NLE) | EU/Mexico agreement: air services |
| Shadow | 2007/0082(NLE) | EC/Vietnam Agreement: air services |
| Responsible | 2001/0234(COD) | Air transport: common rules for civil aviation security |
| Opinion | 1999/2113(COS) | The European airline industry: competitiveness, from singlemarket to world-wide challenges |
- Attended Prescot Girls' Grammar School. Worked for British Airways (1969-1981; 1985-1999). Consultant and advisor to the European aviation, aerospace and defence industries in Brussels (2004-2009).
- Trade Union Representative T+GWU (1976-1979). Deputy General Secretary of Cabin Crew '89 (1989-1999).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 1 |
2008/0246(COD) Rights of passengers when travelling by sea and inland waterway; coordination between national authorities (amend. Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004)
2010/11/05
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 88 #
Council position – amending act Article 3 – point u a (new) ua) “passenger” means any person travelling under a contract of carriage, other than those persons accompanying vehicles, trailers or goods that are being carried as freight or commercial goods.
source: PE-441.013
|
| 8 |
2010/0257(COD) Integrated Maritime Policy: programme to support the further development
2011/03/18
TRAN
8 amendments...
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The Commission Communication on an Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union - COM(2007) 575 of 10 October 2007, states that the primary objective of the Integrated Maritime Policy is to develop and implement
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In its resolution of 21 October 2010 on Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) - Evaluation of progress made and new challenges1, - the European Parliament expressly "supports the Commission's stated intention to finance the IMP with EUR 50 million over the next two years in order to build upon previous projects in the areas of policy, governance, sustainability and surveillance". This money should be spent on serious projects which offer Union added value and high levels of both transparency and accountability must be ensured. 1 P7_TA(2010)0386.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Union funding should be designed to support exploratory work on actions which aim to promote the strategic objectives of the Integrated Maritime Policy, including
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point a (a) to foster the development
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) to support
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) a common information sharing environment for the EU maritime domain which promotes
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) Member State cooperation in the field of maritime spatial planning and integrated coastal zone management, both of which provide a fundamental tool for eco-system based management and sustainable development of marine areas and coastal regions;
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Within the objective set out in Article 2(e) and complementing the sectoral policies, the Programme shall aim to improve and enhance cooperation for
source: PE-460.933
|
| 2 |
2010/0303(COD) European Maritime Safety Agency: further development
2011/06/30
TRAN
2 amendments...
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Recent events highlighted the risks of offshore oil and gas exploration and production activities to maritime transport and the marine environment. The
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Strong cooperation should be fostered between national enforcement authorities including national coastguard services in order to combat marine pollution.
source: PE-467.345
|
| 16 |
2010/2154(INI) Aviation security with a special focus on security scanners
2010/12/13
ENVI
3 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Acknowledges the importance of security scanners as an additional tool to protect the travelling public, but emphasises the fundamental importance of the proper use of cross-border intelligence, the monitoring of Central Reservation Systems and passenger profiling in identifying potential terrorist threats;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on Member States to deploy technology which is the least harmful for human health and which offers acceptable solutions to the public's privacy concerns;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission in conjunction with Member States to produce a Code of Conduct on using security scanners, which requires airports to undertake scanning sensitively, having regard to passengers privacy;
source: PE-454.501
2011/03/22
TRAN
13 amendments...
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Acknowledges the importance of security scanners as an additional tool to protect the travelling public, but emphasises the fundamental importance of making proper use of cross-border intelligence, monitoring central reservation systems and passenger profiling in identifying potential terrorists threats;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Takes the view that
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Takes the view that whe
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Takes the view that passengers
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Member States to deploy technology which is the least harmful for human health and which offers acceptable solutions to the public's privacy concerns;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Believes that such protection can be better achieved when a standard figure is used, and that the use of body images should be not permitted
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Stresses that images should not be stored for longer than is
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Takes the view that
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Reiterates and upholds its standpoint that the ban on carrying liquids should come to an end in
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34a. Asks the Commission to demonstrate, based on a risk assessment as well as on the results of operational tests, that the interim step, expected in April 2011, to relax the ban on carrying liquids will neither undermine aviation security nor disturb significantly passenger experience;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41.
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43.
source: PE-460.986
|
| 11 |
2011/0190(COD) Prevention of pollution from ships: sulphur content of marine fuels
2011/11/30
TRAN
2 amendments...
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The importance of improving environmental standards with regard to the reduction of sulphur emissions in the European Union should be emphasized. However any legislative change at the EU-level must respect decisions already taken at an international level. Any proposal that goes beyond previously agreed standards is a matter for Member States. The appropriate forum for such decisions is the International Maritime Organization.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive - amending act Article 2 – point 1 a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Annex 1a. The timeframe for transposition at EU level must mirror the timeframe and limits already agreed by the Member States at the International Maritime Organization.
source: PE-476.142
2011/12/16
ENVI
9 amendments...
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point b Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point c Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2 Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point e Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 c – paragraph 2 2. Ships using the emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 8 a (new) Directive 1999/32/EC Article 4 e a (new) (8a) The following Article 4ea shall be inserted: „Article 4ea Fuel oil availability Notwithstanding the provisions contained in Articles 3 and Article 4: If a ship is found by a Member State not to be in compliance with the standards for compliant fuel oils set out in this Directive, the competent authority of the Member State may require the ship to: (a) present a record of the actions taken to attempt to achieve compliance; and (b) provide evidence that it attempted to purchase compliant fuel oil in accordance with its voyage plan and, if it was not made available where planned, that attempts were made to locate alternative sources for such fuel oil and that despite best efforts to obtain compliant fuel oil, no such fuel oil was made available for purchase. The ship shall not be required to deviate from its intended voyage or to delay unduly the voyage in order to achieve compliance. If a ship provides the information set out in paragraph 1, Member States shall take into account all relevant circumstances and the evidence presented to determine the appropriate action to take, including not taking control measures. A ship shall notify its administration and the competent authority of the relevant port of destination when it cannot purchase compliant fuel oil. Member States shall notify the Commission when a ship has presented evidence of the non-availability of compliant fuel oil.”
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall take all necessary measures to check by sampling that the sulphur content of fuels used complies with Articles 3, 3a, 4, 4a and 4b. The sampling shall commence on the date on which the relevant limit for maximum sulphur content in the fuel comes into force. It shall be carried out
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) sampling and analysis for verification that the use of marine fuel for onboard combustion is in accordance with guidelines to be developed by the IMO;
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 – point a Directive 1999/32/EC Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 source: PE-478.489
|
| 6 |
2011/0196(COD) Road transport: tachograph system
2012/03/29
TRAN
6 amendments...
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3821/85 Article 5 – paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Member States may decide not to equip their control authorities with the remote early detection equipment needed to request the data communication referred to in the Article as this equipment is not part of the mandatory control equipment lists in Directive 2006/22.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The data exchanged during communication shall be limited to the data necessary for the purpose of targeted roadside checks. It should include driver activities and speed. Data concerning the identity of the driver
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 Article 5 – paragraph 7 7. The competent control authority, on the basis of the data exchanged, may decide to carry out a check on the vehicle and the recording equipment. This roadside filtering must also be complemented by random enforcement checks, regardless of the reading on the roadside unit, to combat possible manipulation of the signal by certain transport undertakings. This may be aided by the establishment of a European wide database, or national databases, which would track the compliance record of transport undertakings, on the basis of physical checks carried out by enforcement officers.
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Any data that can be transmitted or collected in or out of the tachograph whether wirelessly or electronically, whether forming part of a legal requirement or not, should be in the form of a publically available specification. Upon request the specification of the data should be made available immediately from the equipment manufacturer to any third party.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. Member States
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 Article 27 source: PE-485.915
|
| 29 |
2011/0391(COD) Allocation of slots at EU airports: common rules. Recast
2012/09/17
TRAN
29 amendments...
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The Union should facilitate cooperation between the coordinators and schedules facilitators to allow them to exchange best practices
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 (33) The examination procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing instruments concerning
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13 13)
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point ii (ii) upon request from the Commission, in particular where new entrants encounter serious problems in securing landing and take off possibilities at the airport in question
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 This analysis, based on commonly recognised methods which take account of the requirements of the network operational plan, as required by Annex V to Regulation (EU) No 677/2011, shall determine any shortfall in capacity, taking into account environmental constraints at the airport in question. The analysis shall consider the possibilities of overcoming such shortfall through new or modified infrastructure, operational changes, or any other change, and the time frame envisaged to resolve the problems. The Commission can, in conjunction with the Network Manager, help to develop best practice and guidance.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission can ask the network manager to deliver an opinion on how the capacity is set in relation to the network operating needs.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 9 Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 10 Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. The Member State responsible for
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall encourage close cooperation between the coordinators and schedules facilitators to develop common projects at a European level.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii a (new) (iia) The composition of the coordinator's board or supervisory function shall also be independent of the direct interests of the airport managing body, the airline users of that airport and any other entity representing a user or service provider, however this does not preclude representatives from such organisations being members of a board or supervisory function provided that voting rights are balanced.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) remaining available slots with respect to each type of constraint taken into consideration in the coordination parameters. The database shall allow the air carriers to verify the availability of slots
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point e (e) slots transferred or exchanged for a financial or other nature, indicating the identity of the air carriers involved and whether the transfer or exchange was made for compensation of a financial or other nature.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 This information shall be updated regularly. At the end of each season, the coordinator shall publish the activity and financial report mentioned in paragraph 1.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Air carriers operating or intending to operate at a schedules facilitated or coordinated airport
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 At a coordinated airport, the Member State responsible shall ensure that a coordination committee is set up. The same coordination committee may be designated for more than one airport. Membership of this coordination committee shall be
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to Article 10(2), in a situation where all slot requests cannot be accommodated to the satisfaction of the air carriers concerned, preference shall be given to commercial air
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 8 8. The coordinator shall also take into account additional guidelines established by the air transport industry Union -wide or world-wide as well as local guidelines proposed by the coordination committee and approved by the Member State or any other competent body responsible for the airport in question, provided that such guidelines do not affect the independent status of the coordinator, comply with Union law, aim at improving the efficient use of airport capacity
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the coordinator that the series of slots in question has been operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by that air carrier for at least 8
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) Non-scheduled air transportation contributes to regional cohesion and competitiveness. Where air carriers have regularly used slots for such transportation at an airport falling within the scope of this regulation, even where these slots do not always involve the same routes, priority shall be given to requests for continued usage of such slots.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part If the 8
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 7 Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 For the transfers or exchanges referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers shall give the coordinator the details of any monetary or any other kind of compensation.
source: PE-496.307
|
| 46 |
2011/0397(COD) Groundhandling services at Union airports
2012/10/10
TRAN
46 amendments...
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 1 – one holds a majority holding in, or otherwise directly or indirectly controls the other; or
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 2 – a single body has a majority holding in, or otherwise directly or indirectly controls each; or
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 2 a (new) - both airport users belong to the same group;
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Where the number of authorised suppliers is restricted pursuant to paragraph (2), Member States
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) those airports are located on islands or remote mainland locations in the same geographical region; and
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Where
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new) General Consultation Process Member States shall ensure that a procedure for consultation on the application of this Regulation between the managing body of the airport, the Airport Users' Committee and the undertakings providing groundhandling services is organised. This consultation shall cover, inter alia, the price of those groundhandling services for which an exemption has been granted pursuant to Article 14 (1) (b) and (c) and the organisation of the provision of those services. A consultation meeting shall be held at least once a year. The managing body of the airport shall make a record of that meeting which shall be sent to the Commission at its request.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 a (new) Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 b (new) Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. At airports whose annual traffic has been
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point d (d)
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. The approv
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. The procedures
Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the operations of suppliers of groundhandling services
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of this Article,
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 2 2. At airports whose annual traffic has been not less than 5 million passenger movements or 100 000 tonnes of freight for at least the previous three years, the managing body of the airport or, where appropriate, the public authority or any other body which controls the airport shall set minimum quality standards for the performance of groundhandling services limited in accordance with Articles 6(2) or 14.
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 3 3. Suppliers of groundhandling services and self-handling airport users shall endeavour to respect these minimum quality standards. In addition, airport users and suppliers of groundhandling services shall
Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 4 4. The minimum quality standards shall cover in particular the following fields:
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 Amendment 480 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 1. Suppliers of groundhandling services and self-handling airport users shall ensure at their own expense that all their employees involved in the provision of groundhandling services, including managing staff and supervisors
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 2 Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 4 Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Without prejudice to the international commitments of the Union, the Commission may, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 43 (3), decide that a Member State or Member States shall take measures, including the complete or partial suspension of the right of access to the groundhandling market within its territory in respect of suppliers of groundhandling services and self-handling airport users from that third country, with a view to remedying the discriminatory behaviour of the third country concerned, whenever it appears that a third country, with respect to access to the groundhandling or self- handling market:
Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. A Member State may wholly or partially suspend the obligations arising from this Regulation in respect of suppliers of groundhandling services and airport users from that third country, in accordance with Union law.
source: PE-496.364
|
| 52 |
2011/0398(COD) Noise-related operating restrictions at Union airports: rules and procedures
2012/09/28
TRAN
52 amendments...
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Title 1 Proposal for a
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Sustainable development of air transport necessitates the introduction of measures aimed at reducing the noise
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) While a
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) The use of approved noise abatement operational procedures must ensure that the necessary safety of flight is maintained by considering all factors that might affect a particular operation. Noise abatement operational measures must not preclude or prohibit anti-terrorist security measures.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) It is recognised that Member States have decided on noise-related operating restrictions in accordance with national legislation based on nationally acknowledged noise methods, which may not (yet) be fully consistent with the method as described in the authoritative European Civil Aviation Conference Report Doc 29 on
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down rules on the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions in a consistent manner on an airport-by-airport basis and where a noise problem has been identified so as to help improve the noise climate and to limit or reduce the number of people
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) to facilitate the achievement of specific environmental noise abatement objectives, as laid down in
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) ‘Balanced Approach’ means the method
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (4)
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall designate competent authorities responsible for adopting measures on operating restrictions, as well as an independent appeal body in accordance with national laws and practices.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d (d)
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e (e)
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point f (f)
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point g (g)
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point h (h)
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point i Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) not
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Measures or a combination of measures taken in accordance with this Regulation for a given airport shall not be more restrictive than necessary to achieve the environmental noise abatement objectives set for that airport. Operating restrictions shall be non-discriminatory, in particular on grounds of nationality, identity or activity of aircraft operators and be non- arbitrary.
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. The competent authorities shall
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a (new) (a) the method, indicators and information in Annex I are applied to take due account of the contribution of each type of measure under the Balanced Approach, before introducing operating restrictions.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b (new) (b) At the appropriate level, technical cooperation is established between the airport operators, aircraft operators and air navigation service providers to examine measures to mitigate noise The competent authorities shall also ensure that local residents, or their representatives, and relevant local authorities are consulted, and that technical information on noise mitigating measures is provided to them.
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point c (new) (c) The cost-effectiveness of any new operating restriction is assessed, in accordance with Annex II. Minor technical amendments to measures without substantive implications on capacity or operations are not considered as new operating restrictions.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point d (new) (d) The consultation process with interested parties is organised in a timely and substantive manner, ensuring openness and transparency as regards data and computation methodology. Interested parties shall have at least three months prior to the adoption of the new operating restrictions to provide comments. The interested parties shall at least include: (i) the elected officials of the local authorities representing local residents, living in the vicinity of the airports, affected by air traffic noise; (ii) relevant airport operators; (iii) representatives of aircraft operators which may be affected by noise-related actions; (iv) relevant air navigation service providers; (v) the Network Manager, as defined in Commission Regulation No 677/2011; (vi) where applicable, the designated slots coordinator.
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 5 Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 6 Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) the noise
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) any modification of the aircraft which influences its noise performance and is recorded in its noise certificate;
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 The data shall be provided
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Following the assessment carried out in accordance with Article 5, the notification of the decision shall be accompanied by a written report explaining the reasons for introducing the operating restriction, the
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. Where the operating restriction concerns the withdrawal of marginally compliant aircraft from an airport, no new services shall be allowed with marginally compliant aircraft at that airport six months after the notification
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) aircraft on flights operated for humanitarian or diplomatic purposes.
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) amendments of the definitions of aircraft in Article 2 point (3) and of marginally compliant aircraft in Article 2 point (4)
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 1. Competent authorities will use noise assessment methods which have been developed in accordance with
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 1 – point 1.2 1.2 A description of the
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 – heading 1 Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of noise
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The cost-effectiveness of envisaged noise
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 – paragraph 2 – point 1 Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 – paragraph 2 – point 2 2)
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 – paragraph 2 – point 3 3) Direct, indirect and catalytic employment
source: PE-496.539
|
| 4 |
2011/0409(COD) Sound level of motor vehicles
2012/05/21
TRAN
4 amendments...
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) More stringent noise limit values alone cannot reduce noise levels and only with an integrated approach that addresses all sources, including infrastructure, driver behaviour along with further improvements to vehicle design such as tyres/exhaust systems, can overall noise be reduced.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) This Regulation should also further reduce noise limits. It should take account of Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefore, which introduced new stricter noise requirements for motor vehicle tyres. Studies highlighting the annoyance and health effects from road traffic noise, and the associated costs and benefits should also be heeded. In particular, this Regulation must also take account of the huge costs that will be born to industry and consumers at a time of economic hardship and the effects on the competitiveness of European vehicle manufacturers in the global market.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) ‘vehicle type’ means: (2.1) for vehicles, tested according to Annex II, paragraph 4.1.2.1 a set of vehicles as defined in Annex II Part B to Directive 2007/46/EC. (2.2) for vehicles, tested according to Annex II, paragraph 4.1.2.2 a set of vehicles which do not essentially differ in such respects as: (2.2.1) the shape or materials of the bodywork (particularly the engine compartment and its soundproofing); (2.2.2) the type of engine (e.g. positive or compression ignition, two- or four-stroke, reciprocating or rotary piston), number and capacity of cylinders, type of injection system, arrangement of valves, rated engine speed (S), or the type of electric motor. (2.2.3) vehicles having the same type of engine and/or different overall gear ratios, may be regarded as vehicles of the same type. However, if the above differences provide for a different test method, these differences are to be considered as a change of type.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 – point 3.2.1 – introductory part 3.2.1. The vehicle tested shall be
source: PE-489.511
|
| 2 |
2011/2148(INI) Towards a space strategy for the European Union that benefits its citizens
2011/09/14
TRAN
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the need for a greater understanding of the dependencies on space of essential sectors, and encourages Member States and the Commission to promote the importance of space;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on Member States to reconfirm their commitment to EU space projects, such as SESAR, which will prove vitally important for future growth and jobs across various sectors.
source: PE-472.108
|
| 16 |
2011/2150(INI) Functioning and application of established rights of people travelling by air
2012/01/16
TRAN
16 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 provides passengers with strong safeguards and has worked effectively since its introduction, the Volcanic Ash Crisis underlined the need to clarify and re-examine certain aspects of the Regulation should such extraordinary circumstances arise in the future;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas effective complaint systems should be at the disposal of passengers if the service is not properly delivered or if any other rights guaranteed to the passengers are infringed,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that there is a need for a better definition of the EBs’ role, that EBs should have no conflict of interest with air carriers or airports and that national sanctions applicable to air carriers in case of breach of EU rules should be made more effective; considers that EBs should be obliged to publish details of the complaints they receive on a yearly basis
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that information detailing passengers’ rights should be communicated in a simple, appropriate and understandable way throughout the key stages of the journey
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to examine measures that would allow passengers to correct booking errors
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that all passengers, including children younger than 2 years, must be carried safely;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Believes that passengers whose luggage has been lost or delayed should
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses that
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal ensuring that PRM and persons with disabilities have at all times the right to use
source: PE-480.549
|
| 16 |
2012/0184(COD) Periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers. 'Roadworthiness package'
2013/03/28
TRAN
16 amendments...
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) (4a) It is expected that all vehicles should be roadworthy when they are used on public roads and that they may be inspected at any time in which they are being used, in order to confirm this.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 5 Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 8 – wheeled tractors with a maximum design speed exceeding 40 km/h – vehicle category T5 - that are allowed by the Member State to be used on public roads with loaded trailers at speeds greater than 40 km/h.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – vehicles
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9 (9)
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States may require that vehicles of any class registered in the Member State are subject to more frequent periodic roadworthiness testing.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – Vehicles of category M1, N1
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. For each area referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authorities of the Member State or the testing centre shall carry out a roadworthiness test covering at least the items and
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. In the case of dangerous deficiencies, the
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new) (4a) An appropriately qualified person who has performed repairs or maintenance on a vehicle shall be allowed to be involved as an inspector in any subsequent periodic roadworthiness test of the same vehicle.
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall examine the feasibility, costs and benefits of the establishment of an electronic vehicle information platform
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 It shall
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 – part 1 – paragraph 4 All the items listed shall be considered as mandatory at a periodic test of vehicles, except those marked with the indication (X), which are related to the condition of the vehicle and its suitability for use on the road but which are not considered essential in a roadworthiness test. Where it is not possible to test a vehicle using a recommended test method set out in this annex, the test centre may conduct the test in accordance with an alternative method which has been approved in writing by the appropriate competent authority. The competent authority must be satisfied that safety and environmental standards will be maintained.
source: PE-507.994
|
| 16 |
2012/0186(COD) Technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union. 'Roadworthiness package'
2013/03/28
TRAN
16 amendments...
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 – motor vehicles and any attached trailer, used for the carriage of passengers and with more than eight seats, excluding the driver's seat – vehicle category M2 and M3,
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 3 – motor vehicles and any attached trailer used for the carriage of goods and having a maximum permissible mass exceeding 3 500kg - vehicle categories N2 and N3,
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 4 Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 5 Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10 (10)
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The inspector who has performed a roadworthiness test of a vehicle
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part On each initial roadside inspection of a vehicle, the inspector
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a (a) shall check the roadworthiness certificate and roadside inspection report, where available, kept on board in accordance with Article 7(1);
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b (b) shall carry out a visual assessment of the condition of the vehicle and of its cargo
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) may carry out a compliance check against any other regulatory requirement pertaining to the operation of a commercial vehicle within the EU.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b b (new) (b b) may check areas of inspection listed in annex II point 1 by any method deemed appropriate by the inspector of competent authority.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. M
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. A more detailed roadside inspection shall be carried out using a mobile inspection unit, or in a testing
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Mobile inspection units and other facilities authorised to undertake more detailed inspections shall include appropriate equipment for carrying out a roadside inspection, including at least the equipment necessary to assess the condition of the brakes, steering, suspension and emissions of the vehicle.
source: PE-508.051
|
| 3 |
2012/0190(COD) Reducing CO2 emissions from new passenger cars: modalities for reaching the 2020 target
2013/02/28
TRAN
3 amendments...
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) In recognition of the disproportionate impacts on the smallest manufacturers resulting from compliance with specific emissions targets defined on the basis of the utility of the vehicle, high administrative burden of the derogation procedure and only marginal benefit in terms of avoided CO2 from the vehicles sold by these manufacturers, producers responsible annually for less than
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 4 Article 4, Article 8(4)(b) and (c), Article 9 and Article 10(1)(a) and (c) shall not apply to a manufacturer which is responsible together with all of its connected undertakings for less than
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 – point c Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 Article 13 – paragraph 5 By 31 December 201
source: PE-506.122
|
| 3 |
2012/0191(COD) Reducing CO2 emissions from new light commercial vehicles: modalities for reaching the 2020 target
2013/02/27
TRAN
3 amendments...
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) In recognition of the disproportionate impacts on the smallest manufacturers resulting from the compliance with the specific emissions targets defined on the basis of the utility of the vehicle, high administrative burden of the derogation procedure and only marginal benefit in terms of CO2 reduction of the vehicles sold by these manufacturers, producers responsible annually for less than
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 Article 2 – paragraph 4 Article 4, Article 8(4)(b) and (c), Article 9 and Article 10(1)(a) and (c) shall not apply to a manufacturer which is responsible together with all of its connected undertakings for less than
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 – point a Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 Article 13 – paragraph 1 By 31 December 201
source: PE-506.121
|
| 31 |
2012/0305(COD) Fluorinated greenhouse gases
2013/04/05
ENVI
30 amendments...
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Persons
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point d Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Unless the records referred to in paragraph 1 are registered in a database set up by the competent authorities of the Member States, the operators referred to in paragraph 1 shall keep the records
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 Those producers shall ensure that
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall establish
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) persons who install, service, maintain, repair or decommission
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) persons who install, service, maintain, repair or decommission mobile air conditioning equipment.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. Certificates under the certification programmes provided for in paragraph 1 shall be issued on condition of the applicant having
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall establish certification programmes for undertakings carrying out the activities mentioned in paragraph 1, points (a) to (
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The certificates provided for in paragraphs 1
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 6. Member States shall notify the Commission of their
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 20 specifying minimum requirements for the
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. For the purposes of carrying out the activities referred to in Article 8(1) (a) to (d) fluorinated greenhouse gases shall only be sold to and purchased by undertakings that hold the relevant certificate, where applicable, in accordance with Article 8(4) and persons that hold the relevant certificates in accordance with Article 8(1). This paragraph shall not prevent persons who are not certified because they do not carry out any of the activities in Article 8(1) (a) to (d) from collecting, transporting or delivering fluorinated greenhouse gases.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. The use of fluorinated greenhouse gases, or of mixtures that contain fluorinated greenhouse gases, with a global warming potential of 2500 or more, to service or maintain refrigeration equipment with a charge size equivalent to
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. This Regulation shall not apply to medical applications which are of critical use, where no suitable alternative exists, or where such alternatives cannot be used for technical, economic or safety reasons
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. This Article shall not apply to the following: (a) hydrofluorocarbons imported into the Union
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 3. On the basis of information on the placing on the market reported in accordance with Article 17
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new) By 31 December 2020, the Commission shall publish a report on the availability of hydrofluorocarbons on the Union market and shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 20 amending the maximum quantities set out in Annex V in the light of developments of the market in hydrofluorocarbons and related emissions;
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 a (new) However, Commission Regulations 1497/2007, 1516/2007, 303/2008, 304/2008, 305/2008, 306/2008, 307/2008 and 3084/2008 shall remain in force and continue to apply unless and until repealed by Commission [delegated or ] implementing acts adopted pursuant to this Regulation.
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 References to the repealed Regulation 842/2006 shall be construed as references to this Regulation and shall be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex VIII.
source: PE-508.030
2013/04/26
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 This Article shall not apply to the following: (a) hydrofluorocarbons imported into the Union
source: PE-508.267
|
| 8 |
2012/0328(COD) Système d'échange de quotas d'émission de gaz à effet de serre: dérogation temporaire à la directive sur le système communautaire d'échange de quotas d'émission (SCEQE)
2013/01/28
ENVI
4 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 (2) In order to facilitate this progress and provide momentum for the shared commitment of ICAO Member States to address emissions from aviation at a global level, it is desirable to defer enforcement of requirements relating to flights to and from aerodromes outside of the Union and
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 – footnote 1 1. Including E
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 By way of derogation from Article 16 of Directive 2003/87/EC, Member States shall take no action against aircraft operators in respect of requirements set out in Article 12(2a) and Article 14(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC arising before 1
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 By way of derogation from Article 16 of Directive 2003/87/EC, Member States shall take no action against aircraft operators in respect of requirements set out in Article 12(2a) and Article 14(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC arising before 1 January 2014 in respect of activity to or from aerodromes in countries outside the European Union that are not members of E
source: PE-504.161
2013/01/29
TRAN
4 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 (2) In order to facilitate this progress and provide momentum for the shared commitment of ICAO Member States to address emissions from aviation at the global level, it is desirable to defer enforcement of requirements relating to flights to and from aerodromes outside of the Union and
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 – footnote 1 1. Including E
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 By way of derogation from Article 16 of Directive 2003/87/EC, Member States shall take no action against aircraft operators in respect of requirements set out in Article 12(2a) and Article 14(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC arising before 1
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision Article 1 – paragraph 1 By way of derogation from Article 16 of Directive 2003/87/EC, Member States shall take no action against aircraft operators in respect of requirements set out in Article 12(2a) and Article 14(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC arising before 1 January 2014 in respect of activity to or from aerodromes in countries outside the European Union that are not members of E
source: PE-504.144
|
| 1 |
2012/2005(INI) Implementation of the Single European Sky legislation
2012/08/06
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Remains extremely concerned that the creation of Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) across Europe are behind schedule and highlights the importance of political action to reach the objectives, therefore calls on the Member States to fulfil their obligations to ensure the implementation of the functional airspace blocks by 4 December 2012 and calls on the Commission to thoroughly monitor the developments and, if necessary, to take legal action against those Member States violating their obligations under the Single European Sky Legislation;
source: PE-491.198
|
| 10 |
2012/2056(INI) eCall: new 112 service for citizens
2012/09/05
IMCO, TRAN
10 amendments...
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas Parliament has expressed its support for the introduction of eCall on numerous occasions,
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas a voluntary approach to deployment in the EU has been Commission policy since 2003 but has not achieved significant progress to date, in large part due to the costs associated with implementation, which would be passed on to the consumer;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas private in-vehicle emergency call services exist today, but none of them offers full EU-wide coverage and market penetration is below 0.4 % of the vehicle fleet, while some of the services introduced have been dismantled due to market failures, leaving the user without in-vehicle emergency call service during the lifetime of the vehicle, whereas, however, a number of vehicle manufacturers are increasing the deployment of their eCall systems and others have announced the deployment of new emergency assistance services in the very near future;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the technology
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Welcomes the initiative to take steps to reduce road fatalities across Europe and supports a cross border approach by emergency services; stresses however, that eCall devices should only be fitted if required by the customer and therefore supports a voluntary approach to the project;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Regrets the delays and lack of progress in the voluntary deployment of eCall to date; acknowledges, however, that the mandatory deployment of a public, 112- based eCall system by 2015 in all new type-approved cars will result in increased costs for motor manafacturers, which would be passed on to the consumer;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that eCall should be a
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers that a public EU-wide eCall service can coexist with private emergency services,
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Emphasises that the eCall system utilises technical components (satellite positioning, processing and communication capabilities) that could also provide the basis for several other in-vehicle applications and services but stresses that the eCall controller cannot be "open" for reliability reasons concerning safety, security and consumer protection;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the eCall system is based on an interoperable
source: PE-489.409
|
| 4 |
2012/2296(INI) Strategy for an electronic toll service and a vignette system on light private vehicles in Europe
2013/03/26
TRAN
4 amendments...
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas Member States
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Agrees with the Commission that the current EETS system has been a failure, and emphasises that drastic action is needed in order to create an interoperable EETS; believes that the Commission should draw up proposals for a
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 source: PE-507.996
|
| 12 |
2012/2299(INI) EU's External Aviation Policy - Addressing future challenges
2013/03/28
TRAN
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas aviation is a rapidly growing area of the economy,
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas aviation has an important role to play in connecting people and business both inside the Union and
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that there has been important progress in defining and implementing Union mechanisms and systems such as the Single European Sky (SES), the SES Air Traffic Management Research (SESAR), the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) to enhance safety and meet passenger requirements, further progress must be made in these areas to avoid negative economic consequences;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Is deeply concerned that many Member States have both failed to meet the December 2012 deadline and failed to make any progress regarding the Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs); supports the Commission in taking punitive action against those Member States who have not complied;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that these EU programmes are important not only for the internal market but also for external policy; the completion and implementation of these instruments will help to consolidate the position of the EU's industry in the competitive global market;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Emphasises that some of the requests in Parliament's 2006 resolution are still to be met; emphasises, in particular, the need to promote
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes an important increase in traffic to, from and within the Asia-Pacific region, reflecting its trend economic growth; is worried about the possibility that, if nothing is done, EU airlines may lose the capacity to compete fairly in order to generate profits;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Emphasises the importance of airport hubs and the urgent need for investments in airport infrastructure, for example, building new runway capacity;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls on the Commission to complete the negotiations of comprehensive air agreements with key partners, including the Russian Federation and Brazil, and on the Council to grant the Commission a mandate to negotiate such agreements with fast-
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30.
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Considers that the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) has an important role to play in developing regulatory frameworks for the global aviation sector, for example in the liberalisation of ownership and control of airlines; encourages the ICAO to continue to develop global, market-based measures to limit greenhouse gas emissions; believes that an agreement within ICAO
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Calls on the Commission to think carefully before introducing any additional punitive measures that damage the competitiveness of Union air carriers;
source: PE-508.010
|
Jacqueline FOSTER on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |