Guido MILANA
Constituencies
-
Italy
Partito Democratico
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Groups
-
S&D
Member
Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vice-Chair of | Committee on Fisheries | 2012/01/24 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Transport and Tourism | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Member of | Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://www.guidomilana.eu
- http://www.facebook.com/guido.milana
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45524
- Fax
- +322 28 49524
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 15G210
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75524
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79524
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T06133
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Parlamento europeo
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 15G210
- B-1047 Bruxelles
Rapporteur
| Responsible | 2012/2261(INI) | Strategy for fisheries in the Adriatic and Ionian Seas |
| Opinion | 2012/2009(DEC) | Special report 12/2011 (2011 discharge): Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities? |
| Opinion | 2011/2201(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission |
| Shadow | 2011/2086(INI) | Fisheries restrictions and jurisdictional waters in the Mediterranean and Black Sea - ways for conflict resolution |
| Shadow | 2011/0380(COD) | European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) 2014-2020 |
| Shadow | 2010/0257(COD) | Integrated Maritime Policy: programme to support the further development |
| Responsible | 2009/2107(INI) | A new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture |
| Shadow | 2009/0005(COD) | Maritime transport: formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from Member State ports (repeal. Directive 2002/6/EC) |
Born
1954/03/02 Roma- Secondary school-leaving certificate in science. University of Cassino, advanced training course and specialisation in town and country planning (2005-2006).
- Confcoltivatori (small farmers' confederation) official (1973-1977); Vice-Chair of the Lazio Association of Agricultural Cooperatives in the League of Cooperatives (1978-1980). Head of the productive sectors department of the National Association of Consumer Cooperatives (COOP) (1980-1983); member of the Trade Committee of the Rome City Council (1986-1995); member of the Board of the National Association of Consumer Cooperatives (1983-1989); Chair of the Regional Association of Consumer Cooperatives in Lazio (1989-2001); member of the Trade Committee of the Lazio Regional Council (1990-1999). Chair of Zephiro publishing house
- (1994-1998). Chair of Vignale advertising agency (1994-1998). Editor of 'Cinque' magazine (local self-government) (1996-2005). Deputy administrator of the Simbrivio Aqueduct (since June 2001). Manager of a company which builds shopping centres (since January 2002).
- UPI LAZIO - Regional Union of the Provinces of Lazio (1995-1999). ALDE Vice-Chair at the Committee of the Regions (2005-2009).
- Councillor of the 12th district in Rome (1989-1994); Member of the Rome Provincial Council (1995-1998); Mayor of Olevano Romano (1999-2005). Member of the Council of ANCI Lazio (National Association of Italian Municipalities) (1999-2005). Member of the Rome Provincial Council (1999-2005); regional councillor (since April 2005); Vice-President of the Lazio Regional Council (2005-2006); President of the Lazio Regional Council (2006-2009); Vice-Chair of the Committee on Institutional Affairs and Local Authorities and of the Supervisory Committee for Pluralism in Information (2004-2006); Vice-Chair of the Committee on SMEs, Commerce and Crafts (2004-2006).
- Advisory Committee on Consumers (1986-1988). Committee of the Regions, member of the Commission for Territorial Cohesion (COTER) and the Commission for Economic and Social Policy (ECOS) (2005-2007); Committee of the Regions, member of the Commission for Sustainable Development (DEVE) and the Commission for Culture, Education and Research (EDUC) (since 2007).
- Awarded a knighthood as Cavaliere della Repubblica italiana (1992). 'Officer of the Italian Republic' (1996). Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany (2008).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 1 |
2009/0005(COD) Maritime transport: formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from Member State ports (repeal. Directive 2002/6/EC)
2010/01/03
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Access to these electronic systems must be regulated in order to protect commercial and confidential information. The introduction of these systems must not result in uncontrolled processing of economically sensitive information belonging to market operators. A reliable access control system is necessary, including an obligation to provide thorough justifications.
source: PE-438.195
|
| 3 |
2009/0116(COD) Conservation of fishery resources: catch documentation programme for bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1984/2003)
2010/03/15
PECH
3 amendments...
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Should it be decided to include bluefin tuna in Appendix I at the Conference of the Parties to CITES due to meet in Doha on 13-25 March, provision should be made to grant a derogation for traditional fishing and authorisation only to long-line fishing below 24 metres, and traps; furthermore, the Commission must have at its disposal compensatory resources additional to those earmarked in the European Fisheries Fund (EFF).
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 - paragraph 4 4. Where the bluefin tuna quantities caught and landed are less than 1 ton or three fish, the fishing logbook or the sales note may be used as a temporary catch document, pending the validation of the catch document within seven days and prior to domestic trade or export.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 a (new) Article 14a Review of the Regulation The Commission shall review this Regulation following the updated scientific opinions on stock size which will be submitted at the forthcoming meetings of the ICCAT and shall put forward any amendments that are necessary.
source: PE-439.421
|
| 4 |
2009/0173(COD) Reduction of CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles: emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles
2010/10/05
TRAN
4 amendments...
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Manufacturers’ compliance with the targets under this Regulation should be assessed at the Community level. Manufacturers whose average specific emissions of CO2 exceed those permitted under this Regulation should pay an excess emissions premium with respect to each calendar year from 1 January 201
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. In respect of the period 1 January 201
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) In 2015 (i) For excess emissions of more than 3 g CO2/km: ((Excess emissions - 3) x €20+45€) x number of new light commercial vehicles. (b) In 2016 (i) For excess emissions of more than 3 g CO2/km: ((Excess emissions - 3) x €35+45€) x number of new light commercial vehicles. (c) In 2017 (i) For excess emissions of more than 3 g CO2/km: ((Excess emissions - 3) x €60+45€) x number of new light commercial vehicles. (d) From 2018 (i) For excess emissions of more than 3 g CO2/km: ((Excess emissions - 3) x €95+45€) x number of new light commercial vehicles.
source: PE-441.205
|
| 2 |
2009/2096(INI) A sustainable future for transport
2010/03/26
TRAN
2 amendments...
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the decarbonising transport is one of the main challenges of future EU transport policy and that all available sustainable means should be used in order to achieve this such as
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for inland waterway transport, inland ports and the multimodal linking of seaports with the hinterland to play a greater role in European transport policy. Calls, too, for due attention to be given to the specific characteristics of the countries of the Mediterranean, which are affected by serious traffic disruption due to high flows of commercial transport by road and underdeveloped road and rail links. It would thus be advisable to develop infrastructure and logistics of Mediterranean ports in order to expand roll on/roll off commercial maritime networks over short routes; this would be consistent with the climate and energy package that commits the EU to a 20% reduction in the level of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020;
source: PE-439.922
|
| 16 |
2009/2106(INI) Green Paper on reform of the common fisheries policy
2009/12/17
PECH
16 amendments...
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the application of the CFP interacts directly with areas as vast as the environment, safety, public health, consumer protection and regional development and all exogenous factors that contribute to changes in habitat, place a strain on the marine ecosystem, affect the stability of biological resources and have an impact on species reproduction, such as the acidification of the oceans and the rise in sea temperatures, coastal erosion, mining activities and military prohibitions, and whereas it is essential to guarantee proper and careful harmonisation between all these areas,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the maintenance of modern, competitive and safe fishing fleets is not incompatible with the reduction in fishing capacity, which has in fact been carried out by various Member States in order to bring it more closely into line with the availability of resources, and whereas stakeholders have always advocated measures that will not depress the sector but will have positive and gradual effects, such as efforts to increase fish biomass, reducing fishing days, establishing biological protection zones, upgrading small-scale fisheries, etc.,
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing constitutes one of the most serious threats against a sustainable exploitation of living aquatic resources which jeopardises the very foundation of the CFP and international efforts to promote better ocean governance, and whereas the Council Regulation establishing a Community control system, which is shortly to be implemented, is intended to further promote control and deterrence,
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative of submitting the Green Paper, which is forming the basis to a consultation procedure and a major discussion on the constraints and challenges facing the current CFP, with a view to an urgent and far-reaching reform thereof, and also calls for stakeholders' views to be taken into account;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the current CFP is one of the most integrated Community policies, which gives the Community broad powers for the management of marine resources, and also calls for stakeholders to be more closely involved;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points out that Parliament has in previous terms drawn attention to the fact that CFP rules were not being sufficiently complied with and has repeatedly called on Member States to improve controls, harmonise inspection and sanction criteria, ensure transparency of inspection findings and strengthen the Community inspection systems; in order to overcome these contradictions, it would be useful to involve the main stakeholders and give them greater responsibilities;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that scientific knowledge of marine ecosystems is a sine qua non for the establishment of a policy for the conservation and sustainable management of fisheries resources, with the involvement and participation of cooperative sector research workers as observers and full representatives on RACs;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses that the success of aquaculture will depend on an enterprise-friendly environment at national and/or local level and that Member States and regional authorities should be given guidelines enabling them to establish a framework suitable for the implementation of the Community approach while expanding the base of operators capable of investing in environment-friendly aquaculture, giving preference to undertakings and fishermen whose activities are in decline;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Maintains that the CFP should adopt an ecosystem approach, which should be taken into account equally in all of the economic activities carried on, where these affect the marine environment, placing emphasis on integrated management of coastlines where complex ecosystems are to be found and where a very delicate ecological balance must be struck between environmental, economic, social, recreational and cultural interests;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Points to the need for greater investment in research and scientific knowledge in the fisheries field, encouraging collective research organisations, whose competence and experience have increased in recent years, and for the fisheries sector to be dovetailed more effectively into the subject areas covered by the framework programmes to promote research;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges the Commission to draw up a specific Community support programme for small-scale coastal and non-industrial fisheries as this kind of selective fishing has a lower impact, employs more people, has strong local roots and places emphasis on the traditional role of non- industrial fisheries;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges the Commission and the Member States to promote proper training for fishermen with a view to enhancing the status of qualifications, giving prestige to the profession, and attracting more adaptable young people who would be capable of embracing occupational mobility and taking a more entrepreneurial attitude to the sector and incorporating all the technical, scientific and cultural elements needed to help overcome the widespread perception of fisheries as a peripheral activity;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Considers it necessary to ensure higher first-sale prices of fishery products and to reduce the number of middlemen in the chain stretching from producers to consumers and, to an increasing extent, secure the involvement of producers’ organisations in the management of stocks and the marketing of fishery products, the aim being to make the catching sub-sector as profitable as possible and to encourage and support all direct sales and marketing activities by producers capable of shortening the chain;
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Maintains that the management system for the fisheries sector has to abandon the traditional top-down approach, laying emphasis instead on the principle of regionalisation and subsidiarity (horizontal decentralisation) and the participation of professionals in the sector, taking into account the multifarious specific features of the Community fleet; firmly rejects any attempt to adopt a universal Community fisheries management model, in a form serving to impose uniformity and calls instead for due account to be taken of the fact that, because of its configuration and geophysical characteristics, the Mediterranean cannot be compared to or treated in the same way as northern seas, whose characteristic features are different;
Amendment 322 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Maintains that Regional Advisory Councils (RACs) and the Community Fisheries Control Agency should participate more actively in the CFP reform process and be placed in a position, logistically and financially, to exercise their updated responsibilities effectively and to the full, as set out in Parliament's resolution of 25 March 2009 (A6- 0187/2009), which proposes that the visibility of the RACs should be improved and their participation promoted, giving them observer status within the various institutional bodies, including Parliament's Committee on Fisheries and the Commission’s Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee on Fisheries (STECF) and Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (ACFA) as well as the Council of Fisheries Ministers itself;
Amendment 370 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Considers that the sustainable development of aquaculture requires environment-friendly production methods, stringent health and animal welfare standards, and a high level of consumer protection including incentives for organic aquaculture production and efforts to enhance the efficiency of fish farming plants;
source: PE-430.947
|
| 1 |
2009/2107(INI) A new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture
2010/04/14
PECH
1 amendments...
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to propose specific criteria in relation to the well- being of farmed fish, such as maximum levels of farming density, the quantity of vegetable and animal proteins that can be used in feedstuffs on fish farms, and which take into account the nutritional requirements of the fish species farmed, the phases in their life cycle and the environmental conditions, and to promote transportation and slaughter practices which limit sources of stress, and the changing of water in fish ponds in such a way as to guarantee the well-being of the fish being farmed there; however, strategic research into replacements for the essential ingredients should be of highest priority; fishmeal and fish oil contain specific nutrients that make them essential for fish even at low levels; research into the essential nutrients and how to produce them from alternative sources such as microalgae and yeast would reduce the need for fish meal in the longer term; although we do not wish to see fishmeal and oil completely eliminated from diets, research on alternative sources of the essential nutrients found in fish meal can be a long-term solution to sustainable expansion of the industry;
source: PE-439.917
|
| 2 |
2009/2238(INI) Arrangements for importing fishery and aquaculture products into the EU with a view to the future reform of the CFP
2010/05/26
PECH
2 amendments...
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Considers that EU efforts to conserve fish stocks and make fishing sustainable, pursued through the CFP, must
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Emphasises the importance of rigorously applying all aspects of EU law in relation to health standards and inspections (including food safety, traceability and prevention)
source: PE-441.203
|
| 36 |
2010/0257(COD) Integrated Maritime Policy: programme to support the further development
2011/03/16
PECH
23 amendments...
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation establishes a Programme to support measures intended to further promoting the development and implementation of the Integrated Maritime Policy (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Programme’), the primary objective of which is to ensure the conservation and sustainable use of marine and coastal ecosystems and resources, whilst ensuring social cohesion and the expansion of scientific knowledge.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point a (a) to foster the development and implementation of integrated governance of maritime and coastal affairs and integrated sea basin strategies, particularly in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point c (c) to support joined up policy-making and to promote the conservation and sustainable use of the marine and coastal resources and sustainable economic growth, innovation and employment in maritime sectors and coastal regions, in coherence with sectoral policy priorities and actions;
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e a(new) (ea) to guarantee comprehensive information and transparency of the decision-making processes.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) stimulate and reinforce dialogue and cooperation with and among stakeholders on cross-cutting issues related to Integrated Maritime Policy, whilst guaranteeing full transparency;
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) promote the establishing cross-sectoral cooperation platforms and networks, including interests from industry, research stakeholders, regions, public authorities and NGOs, whose principal objective is protection from, and containment of, the adverse impact of human activities on the marine environment, conservation of ecosystems and the sustainable development of marine and coastal areas;
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) encourage research for the purpose of assessing the current state of threatened ecosystems, thereby providing a basis for planning at regional and national level;
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new) (eb) promote renewable marine energy sources;
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e c(new) (ec) differentiate between the development parameters and models for various interlinked maritime activities distinguishing between inshore and deep sea activities;
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Regarding the objectives set out in Article 2(a) (integrated sea basin strategies), the programme shall seek to achieve: (a) the development of basins in which international waters occupy a limited area and on which Member States and third countries are situated; (b) the development of basins in which an exchange of information and experience between various countries is already established and operational multi- national structures are in existence; (c) the development of basins where certain morphological, environmental and economic factors make it possible to measure similar experiences against a common yardstick; (d) the development of experimental and other measures combining the generation of wind energy and fish breeding using off-shore platforms.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) maritime spatial planning and integrated coastal zone management, both of which provide a fundamental tool for eco-system based management and sustainable development of marine areas
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) maritime spatial planning and integrated coastal zone management, both of which provide a fundamental tool for eco-system based management and sustainable development of marine areas and coastal regions, encouraging suitable assistance for those countries seeking to implement biodiversity conservation measures;
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) creation of marine parks and further development of protected marine areas, with a view to protecting biodiversity and encouraging the reconstitution of fish stocks;
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) international partners
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) international partners and organisations, particularly in relation to international ecosystem restoration commitments and other pertinent agreements
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. With regard to the external dimension of the IMP, the Programme shall promote the signing, ratification and implementation of international agreements, such as UNCLOS, the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and the Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing, through collaboration and coordination with third countries in relation to the objectives of the IMP.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point a (a) studies, including studies on the identification of legislative weaknesses with regards to flags of convenience and illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing, and cooperative programmes;
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point b (b) public information and best practice sharing, awareness raising and associated communication and dissemination activities, including publicity campaigns, and events and the development and maintenance of websites and relevant databases;
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point c Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point d (d) pooling, monitoring, visualisation of and ensuring public access to a significant amount of data, best practices and of database on Union funded regional projects, including where appropriate through a secretariat established for one or a number of these purposes, giving priority to those projects concerning data collection and processing in accordance with common uniform standards;
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The Programme may benefit third countries, stakeholders in third countries,
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Programme shall lead to benefits for local coastal and insular communities.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council: (a) a report on progress achieved by 31 December 2012 and the proposal for a regulation establishing a programme to support the further development of the IMP for the period 2014-2016; (b) an ex-post evaluation report no later than 31 December 2014.
source: PE-458.799
2011/03/18
TRAN
13 amendments...
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point a (a) to foster the development and implementation of integrated governance of maritime and coastal affairs and integrated sea basin strategies, particularly in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e a (new) (ea) to guarantee comprehensive information and transparency of the decision-making processes.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Regarding the objectives set out in Article 2(a) (integrated sea basin strategies), the programme shall seek to achieve: (a) the development of basins in which international waters occupy a limited area and on which Member States and third countries are situated; (b) the development of basins in which an exchange of information and experience between various countries is already established and operational multi- national structures are in existence; (c) the development of basins where certain morphological, environmental and economic factors make it possible to measure similar experiences against a common yardstick; (d) the development of experimental and other measures combining the generation of wind energy and fish breeding using offshore platforms.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) promote the establishing cross-sectoral cooperation platforms and networks, including interests from industry, research stakeholders, regions, public authorities and NGOs, whose principal objective is protection from, and reduction of, the adverse impact of human activities on the marine environment, conservation of ecosystems and the sustainable development of marine and coastal areas;
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) encourage research for the purpose of assessing the current state of threatened ecosystems, thereby providing a basis for planning at regional and national level;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new) (eb) promote renewable marine energy sources;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new) (ec) differentiate between the development parameters and models for various interlinked maritime activities, distinguishing between inshore and deep- sea activities.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) maritime spatial planning and integrated coastal zone management, both of which provide a fundamental tool for eco-system based management and sustainable development of marine areas and coastal regions, encouraging suitable assistance for those countries seeking to implement biodiversity conservation measures;
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) international partners and organisations, particularly in relation to international ecosystem restoration commitments and other pertinent agreements
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point c Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – point d (d) pooling, monitoring, visualisation of and ensuring public access to a significant amount of data, best practices and of database on Union funded regional projects, including where appropriate through a secretariat established for one or a number of these purposes, giving priority to those projects concerning data collection and processing in accordance with common uniform standards;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 a (new) Article 8a Areas of expenditure for various objectives The financial envelope set out in Article 8 shall be earmarked for the following areas: (a) integrated maritime governance and related activities in maritime basins; (b) instruments for the development of an integrated maritime policy; (c) promotion of the international dimension of the integrated maritime policy and heightening of Europe’s maritime profile; (d) definition of sustainability limits in respect of maritime activities through adoption of the marine strategy framework directive, as well as sustainable economic growth, job creation and innovation.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council: (a) a report on progress achieved by 31 December 2012 and the proposal for a regulation establishing a programme to support the further development of the IMP from 2014 onwards; (b) ) an ex-post evaluation report no later than 31 December 2014.
source: PE-460.933
|
| 1 |
2010/2210(INI) Combating illegal fishing at the global level - the role of the EU
2011/06/21
PECH
1 amendments...
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Fully supports the current FAO initiative to develop, as soon as possible, a Global Record of Fishing Vessels, which should not only be compulsory
source: PE-467.233
|
| 106 |
2011/0195(COD) Common Fisheries Policy
2012/06/25
PECH
106 amendments...
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The scope of the Common Fisheries Policy extends to conservation
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The Union is a Contracting Party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 (UNCLOS)18 and it has ratified the United Nations Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks of 4 August 1995 (UN Fish Stocks Agreement) . It has also accepted the Agreement to Promote Compliance with International Conservation and Management Measures by Fishing Vessels on the High Seas of 24 November 1993 of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO Compliance Agreement)19. These international instruments predominantly foresee conservation obligations, including among other things obligations to take conservation and management measures designed to maintain or restore marine resources at levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield both within sea areas under national jurisdiction and on the high seas, and to cooperate with other States to this end, obligations to apply the precautionary approach widely to conservation, management and exploitation of fish stocks, obligations to ensure compatibility of conservation and management measures where marine resources occur in sea areas of different jurisdictional status and obligations to have due regard to other legitimate uses of the seas. In the interests of a harmonised sustainable fisheries policy in all shared seas and to improve cooperation with neighbouring countries and the management of shared stocks, the Union should seek to conclude sustainable fisheries cooperation agreements with third countries, under which the Union can provide financial and technical assistance in exchange for application of the same, or comparable, rules on sustainable management as applied in the Union. The Common Fisheries Policy should contribute to the Union's proper discharge of its international obligations under these international instruments. Where Member States adopt conservation and management measures, for which they have been empowered in the framework of the Common Fisheries Policy, they should also act in a manner which is fully consistent with the international conservation and cooperation obligations under the said international instruments.
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The objective of sustainable exploitation of marine biological resources is more effectively achieved through a multi-annual approach to fisheries management. To that end, the Member States should work in close cooperation with the public authorities and Regional Advisory Councils to create the conditions for sustainability, including at a local level, via participatory action at regional level that is more cohesive as regards the decision-making procedures that lead into the drawing-up of multi-annual plans, establishing as a priority multi-annual plans reflecting the specificities of different fisheries.
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Measures are needed to reduce and gradually eliminate the current high levels of unwanted catches and discards. Indeed, unwanted catches and discards constitute a substantial waste and affect negatively the sustainable exploitation of marine biological resources and marine ecosystems as well as the financial viability of fisheries. An obligation to land all catches of managed stocks caught during fishing activities in Union waters or by Union fishing vessels should be established and gradually implemented.
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Landings of unwanted catches should not result in full economic advantages for the operator. For landings of catches of fish under the minimum conservation reference size, the destination of such catches should be limited and exclude sale for human consumption or otherwise.
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21a) The Common Fisheries Policy should ensure that commonly defined objectives are achieved by all Union fleets and fisheries. In order to achieve the targets under the new legislation it will be necessary, in situations where adaptation is particularly difficult, to provide for transitional adjustment periods, with a view to achieving sustainable fishery.
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 b (new) (21b) The Union should step up its efforts to achieve effective international cooperation and stock management in seas which are bordered by both EU Member States and third countries, providing for the creation, where appropriate, of regional fisheries management organisations for such areas.
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 a (new) (32a) Member States will be able to introduce a system of non-transferable and non-mandatory fishing concessions.
Amendment 546 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 (53) Dialogue with stakeholders has proven essential for the achievement of the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy. Taking into account the diverse conditions throughout Union waters and increased regionalisation of the Common Fisheries Policy, Advisory Councils should enable the Common Fisheries Policy to benefit from the knowledge and experience of all stakeholders, particularly in the drafting of the multiannual plans.
Amendment 555 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) It appears appropriate that the Commission
Amendment 564 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 55 (55) To achieve the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of specifying fishing related measures to alleviate the impact of fishing activities in special areas of conservation, adaptation of the obligation to land all catches for the purpose of complying with the Union's international obligations, default conservation measures in the framework of multiannual plans or technical measures, the recalculation of fleet capacity ceilings (on the basis of a clear definition of ‘overcapacity’), definition of information on characteristics and activity for Union fishing vessels, rules for carrying out pilot projects on new control technologies and data management systems, amendments to Annex III in relation to the areas of competence for Advisory Councils and the
Amendment 705 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) provide conditions for efficient
Amendment 715 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) reduce overcapacity in order to achieve a stable and enduring balance between fishing capacity and the fishing opportunities;
Amendment 822 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) public access to environmental information in line with Directive 2003/4/EC .
Amendment 844 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 6 –
Amendment 856 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 6 b (new) – 'harvested species' means all species of marine biological species subject to fishing pressure and/or exploitation, including the species that are not landed, but caught as bycatch or impacted by a fishery;
Amendment 870 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 8 –
Amendment 901 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 13 –
Amendment 929 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 17 –
Amendment 986 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 –
Amendment 992 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 a (new) – 'harvested species' mean all species of marine biological resources subject to fishing;
Amendment 994 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 a (new) – Fishing tourism: a complementary activity for professional fishermen, allowing on board fishing vessels persons not forming part of the crew for the purposed of tourism, leisure or study, possibly providing them with meals on board.
Amendment 1000 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 b (new) – 'vulnerable marine resources' means (i) marine biological resources breaching minimum conservation reference size, or that have not reached the point of first sexual maturation, or that are spawning, (ii) habitats and species protected in or under measures pursuant to Article 4(2) and Annex I of Directive 2009/147/EC, Annexes I, II and IV of Directive 92/43/EEC and/or Article 13(4) of Directive 2008/56/EC, (iii) any habitat or species wh9ich is protected in a marine protected area;
Amendment 1005 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 d (new) – 'maximum sustainable economic yield' means the level of catch that may be taken from a fish stock indefinately that produces the largest positive difference between total revenues and total costs of fishing;
Amendment 1007 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 f (new) – 'catch' means any marine biological resources that are captured by fishing;
Amendment 1008 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 g (new) – 'unwanted catch' means all bycatch that is unwanted because it has no or little commercial value, it is below minimum landing size or it is a protected species;
Amendment 1009 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 h (new) – 'discard' means the portion of a catch that is dumped or thrown overboard at sea;
Amendment 1011 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 j (new) – 'sustainable exploitation' means the exploitation of a marine biological resource in such a way that the stock will not collapse, a healthy age-size distribution within the stock is maintained, the future exploitation of the stock will not be prejudiced and that it does not have a negative impact on the marine ecosystem;
Amendment 1012 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 k (new) – 'low impact fishing' means utilising selective fishing techniques, which have a minimal detrimental impact on marine ecosystems and low fuel emissions;
Amendment 1013 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 l (new) – 'selective fishing' means a fishing method's or fishing gear's ability to target and capture organisms by size and species during the fishing operation allowing non-targets to be avoided or released unharmed;
Amendment 1060 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b c (new) (bc) establishing fish stock recovery areas according to what is provided for in this Regulation;
Amendment 1069 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) establishing incentives, including
Amendment 1084 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) establishing conservation reference sizes;
Amendment 1114 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) me
Amendment 1125 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) prohibitions of the use of certain
Amendment 1133 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) prohibition or restriction of fishing activities in certain zones and/or periods, including measures for protecting spawning, nursery and feeding grounds and other essential fish habitats, in order to ensure that fish stock are maintained or restored above levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield by 2015;
Amendment 1151 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) other technical measures aimed at protecting marine biodiversity
Amendment 1189 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) measures ensuring adequate data collection to enable accurate scientific stock assessments and monitoring of harvested species; and
Amendment 1211 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Multiannual programmes to conserve living resources and guarantee long-term environmental sustainability shall consider the possibility of creating a network of restricted areas in which all types of fishing activity are banned for a certain period so as to increase fish stocks and conserve aquatic life and marine ecosystems.
Amendment 1284 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) objectives consistent with the objectives set out in Articles 2, 3 and
Amendment 1330 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) measures to protect the species listed in Annexes II and IV of Directive 92/43/EEC from the impacts of fishing activities;
Amendment 1341 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) targets relating to other living aquatic resources and the maintenance or improvement of the conservation status of marine eco-systems;
Amendment 1342 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) the creation of fish restocking areas;
Amendment 1354 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) safeguards
Amendment 1421 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The emergency measures shall have immediate effect. They shall be notified to the Member States concerned, and published in the Official Journal.
Amendment 1470 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 b (new) The Commission shall publish technical measures frameworks adopted in accordance with this Article.
Amendment 1567 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that Union fishing vessels flying their flag are equipped to ensure full documentation of all fishing and processing activities for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the obligation to land all catches. Member States shall publish records of all catches and make this information publicly available.
Amendment 1608 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 1639 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 17 – paragraph 1 1. In a multiannual plan established pursuant to Articles 9, 10 and 11 Member States
Amendment 1661 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 17 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) are implemented in agreement with the regional Advisory Councils as bodies pursuing an aim of general European interest.
Amendment 1782 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 25 – paragraph 1 – introductory part A Member State or a group of Member States may adopt measures for the conservation of
Amendment 1790 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 26 – paragraph 1 1. A Member State may take non- discriminatory measures for the conservation and management of fish stocks and to m
Amendment 1806 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Each Member State
Amendment 1830 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 1844 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 2 2. Member States may extend the system of
Amendment 1860 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 1 1. A
Amendment 1862 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1868 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1875 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 4 Amendment 1880 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 5 Amendment 1892 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 6 Amendment 1900 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 7 Amendment 1918 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall allocate individual
Amendment 1939 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 4 4. Member States may reserve up to 5% of fishing opportunities. They shall establish objectives and transparent criteria for the allocation of such reserved fishing opportunities.
Amendment 1944 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 5 5. When allocating
Amendment 1950 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 6 6. Member States may set fees for the use of individual and territorial-based fishing opportunities to contribute to fisheries management-related costs.
Amendment 1956 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 30 – title Register of
Amendment 1959 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 30 – paragraph 1 Member States shall establish and maintain a register of
Amendment 1966 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 31 Amendment 1972 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 31 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1978 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 31 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1984 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 31 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1998 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 32 Amendment 2002 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 32 – paragraph 1 Amendment 2004 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 32 – paragraph 2 Amendment 2023 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 33 a (new) Article 33a Allocation of a system of concessions Should a Member State decide to introduce a system of concessions in line with the principle of the conservation of resources, this must: - be a territorially-based concession or user right; - be voluntary; - be non-transferable; - be managed by the state, which will decide on the appropriate social safety nets to offset the effects on employment of introducing a system of concessions; - grant priority access to fishermen who fish in a socially and environmentally responsible way; - establish clear measures safeguarding small-scale coastal and artisanal fishing, taking a common definition of small-scale fishing as a starting point; - not be the sole means proposed for reducing overcapacity, but should be accompanied by other actions with the same purpose; - take into account implementation difficulties in sea areas in which the quota system barely exists; - take into account the principle of shared competence, given that the system of concessions concerns the economic distribution of fishing opportunities and the EU fishing fleet;
Amendment 2024 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 33 b (new) Amendment 2086 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 5 – article 36 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall make available to the Commission the information referred to in paragraph 1, this information shall be publicly available.
Amendment 2091 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 5 – article 36 – paragraph 4 4. The information contained in the Union fishing fleet register shall be made available to all Member States and shall be publicly available. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 concerning the definition of the information referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 2097 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – article 37 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall collect biological, technical, environmental and socio- economic data necessary for ecosystem based fisheries and aquaculture management, manage them and make them
Amendment 2108 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the level of fishing and the impact that fishing activities have on the marine biological resources and on the marine eco- systems, in particular in relation to the limit reference point of the fishing mortality rate which will generate maximum sustainable yield, and
Amendment 2118 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – article 37 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) ensure that the collected data are accurate and reliable and collected in a harmonized way in all Member States;
Amendment 2161 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – article 38 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States shall submit annual reports to the Commission on the progress of implementation of national fisheries scientific data collection, research and innovation programs.
Amendment 2163 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – article 38 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. The Commission and/or STECF may evaluate the relevance and accuracy of the national fisheries scientific data collection, research and innovation programs adopted by Member States.
Amendment 2168 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – article 39 – paragraph 1 1. The Union shall participate in the activities of international organisations dealing with fisheries, including regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) in line with international obligations and policy objectives and consistent with the EU's principles, objectives and existing legislations in the field of fisheries, environment and development, including the objectives set out in Articles 2 and 3.
Amendment 2188 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – article 39 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Union must bolster its presence within the various RFMOs. The Union’s participation should centre on improving the governance of these and enhancing the Union’s interests, be they economic, social or environmental.
Amendment 2199 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – article 41 – paragraph 1 1. Sustainable Fisheries Agreements with third countries shall establish a legal, economic
Amendment 2232 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – article 41 a (new) Article 41 a Activities of EU vessels outside EU waters Union fishing vessels shall comply with the principles, objectives and the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy when fishing in third country waters or on the high seas, regardless of whether a Sustainable Fisheries Agreement is in place.
Amendment 2254 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – article 43 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. With a view to promoting sustainability and contributing to food security, growth and employment, non-binding Union strategic guidelines on common priorities and targets for the sustainable management and development of aquaculture activities which are ecosystem based shall be established by the Commission by 2013. Such strategic guidelines shall take account of the relative starting positions and different circumstances throughout the Union, shall form the basis for multiannual national strategic plans for Member States that already have or plan to develop aquaculture or ranching activities by 2014. These Plans shall be consistent with articles 2 and 3 and shall aim at:
Amendment 2263 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – article 43 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) improving the competitiveness of the organic and closed-system aquaculture industry and supporting its development and innovation;
Amendment 2264 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – article 43 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) improving the competitiveness of the sustainable organic aquaculture industry and supporting its development and innovation;
Amendment 2304 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – article 43 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall establish a multiannual national strategic plan for the development of sustainable organic aquaculture activities on their territory by 2014.
Amendment 2347 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – article 44 – paragraph 1 An Advisory Council on aquaculture shall be established in accordance with
Amendment 2366 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 9 – article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) contribute to ensuring a level playing field for all products marketed in the Union by promoting sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources
Amendment 2373 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 9 – article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) ensure the traceability of all fishery and aquaculture products throughout the supply chain, shall provide verifiable and accurate information regarding the origin of the product, including, for farmed products, a reference to every Member State or third country in which the product has been hatched, reared, cultivated and slaughtered, and its mode of production, indicating the exact capture or farming method, and shall label the product accordingly, in a clear, detailed, accurate manner, with an emphasis on reliable, independent eco- labelling.
Amendment 2382 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 9 – article 45 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) common marketing standards with respect to the local traditions.
Amendment 2462 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt
Amendment 2487 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – article 53 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) become more widely representative and acquire greater responsibilities, thereby helping actively to draw up multiannual management plans.
Amendment 2490 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – article 53 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (c b) participate in the development of technical measures pursuant to Articles 21 and 22 of this Regulation.
Amendment 2493 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – article 53 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission and, where relevant, the Member State concerned, shall seek a compulsory opinion from Regional Advisory Councils and reply within a reasonable time period to any recommendation, suggestion or information received pursuant to paragraph 1.
Amendment 2504 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – article 54 – paragraph 1 1. Advisory Councils shall broaden their participation base and be composed of organizations representing the fisheries operators and other interest groups affected by the Common Fisheries Policy, including scientists, NGOs, control agencies and local authorities.
source: PE-489.437
|
| 11 |
2011/0275(COD) European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): support to the Investment for growth and jobs goal
2012/07/06
REGI
11 amendments...
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 bis (new) (5a) In its resolution of 8 June 2011, the European Parliament pointed out that youth and culture policies are essential and among the priorities recognised for the added value they bring and their ability to reach out to citizens. It also called on the EU and the Member States to acknowledge the increasing importance of cultural and creative industries to the European economy, and their spill-over effects on other economic sectors. It also strongly emphasised that the full potential of these policies can only be realised if they are provided with adequate levels of funding in the context of cohesion policy.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 b (new) (5b) In its resolution of 8 June 2011, the European Parliament recalled that tourism is a new EU competence under the Lisbon Treaty, which should, therefore, also be reflected in the next MFF. It stressed the important contribution of tourism to the European economy and the need for a European strategy for tourism aimed at strengthening the competitiveness of the sector to be supported by adequate funding under the ERDF.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 quater (new) (5c) As noted by the European Court of Auditors in Special Report No 6/2011 entitled ‘Were ERDF co-financed tourism projects effective?’, tourism interventions achieved their objectives in terms of performance, growth and employment, by creating tourism capacity and by creating or maintaining jobs
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point i bis (new) (i a) investment to promote tourism including maritime tourist activity and to protect artistic and cultural heritage
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) at least 80 % of the total ERDF resources
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) at least 50 % of the total ERDF resources
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b bis (new) (b) a) support appropriate synergies and linkages with the EU’s Horizon 2020 programme;
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 1 bis (new) Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point e (e) action to improve the urban environment, including regeneration of deprived urban and outlying areas and brownfield sites and reduction of air pollution;
source: PE-491.053
|
| 30 |
2011/0276(COD) Structural instruments: common provisions for ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD and EMFF; general provisions applicable to ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund
2012/04/06
PECH
21 amendments...
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 65 (65) Where an urban or territorial development strategy – which includes maritime and spatial planning aspects – requires an integrated approach because it involves investments under more than one priority axis of one or several operational programmes, action supported by the Funds should be carried out as an integrated territorial investment within an operational programme.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 70 (70) It is important to bring the achievements of the Union's Funds to the attention of the general public. Citizens have the right to know
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) enhancing the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises and the agricultural sector (for EAFRD) and sustainable fisheries and aquaculture sector (for the EMFF);
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) A performance framework should be defined for each programme with a view to monitoring progress towards the objectives and targets set for each programme over the course of the programming period. The Commission should undertake a performance review in cooperation with the Member States in 2017 and 2019.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 58 Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 58 Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 87 (87) The frequency of audits on operations should be proportionate to the extent of the Union's support from the Funds. In particular,
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. For the Partnership Contract and each programme respectively,
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a)
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) 1a) preserving and promoting the cultural and creative heritage of the Union;
Amendment 486 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 6 6) preserving and protecting the environment, cultural and creative heritage and promoting resource efficiency;
Amendment 551 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall prepare a Partnership Contract
Amendment 645 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 15 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall adopt a decision, by means of implementing acts, approving the Partnership Contract no later than six months after its submission by the Member State, provided that any observations made by the Commission have been satisfactorily taken into account. As part of its decision to adopt the Partnership Contract, the Commission shall take account of the effective involvement of the autonomous regional territories called to enter into the Partnership Contract, in accordance with the institutional system of each Member State. The Partnership Contract shall not enter into force before 1 January 2014.
Amendment 646 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 15 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Where a Member State proposes an amendment to the Partnership Contract, the Commission shall carry out an assessment in accordance with paragraph 1 and, where appropriate, shall adopt a decision, by means of implementing acts, approving the amendment within three months of its submission by the Member State.
Amendment 650 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 16 – paragraph 1 Member States shall concentrate support, in accordance with the Fund-specific rules, on actions bringing the greatest added value in relation to the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, addressing the challenges identified in the country-specific recommendations under Article 121(2) of the Treaty and the relevant Council recommendations adopted under 148(4) of the Treaty, and taking into account national and regional needs. In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, the managing authorities shall independently select the thematic objectives and investment priorities on which to concentrate the Union's support.
Amendment 679 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 17 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission shall assess the information provided on the fulfilment of the ex ante conditionalities in the framework of its assessment of the Partnership Contract and programmes. It may decide, when adopting a programme, to suspend all or part of interim payments to the programme pending the satisfactory completion of actions to fulfil an ex ante
Amendment 695 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 18 Amendment 749 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 23 – paragraph 3 3. Programmes shall be submitted by the Member States
Amendment 755 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1a (new) The possibility of multi-fund operational programmes (ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD, EMFF) shall be encouraged. For this purpose the European Commission adopts any measure for the setting up and implementation of these programmes with due respect to the proportionality principle.
source: PE-491.082
2012/05/06
REGI
4 amendments...
Amendment 815 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 29 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) a description of the strategy and its objectives,
Amendment 1156 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 74 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The payment deadline for an interim payment claim may be interrupted by the authorising officer by delegation within the meaning of the Financial Regulation for a maximum period of
Amendment 1174 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 77 – paragraph 2 – point b b) the
Amendment 1331 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 86 – paragraph 1 – point 3 bis (new) 3a) Public or equivalent structural expenditure supported by the public administration by way of co-financing of investments activated as part of CSF funding will be deducted from the calculation of structural deficit in the definition of the specific medium-term objectives for the country within the framework of EU Regulation 1466/97, and will equally be deducted in the assessment of compliance with the preventive arm of the Stability and Growth Pact, within the framework of EU Regulation 1467/97.
source: PE-491.054
2012/06/06
REGI
3 amendments...
Amendment 1450 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 91 – paragraph 2 2. Major projects submitted to the Commission for approval shall be contained in the list of major projects in an operational programme.
Amendment 1588 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 107 – paragraph 4 4. Union networks comprising the members designated by the Member States and the managing authorities shall be set up by the Commission to ensure exchange on the results of the implementation of the communication strategies, the exchange of experience in implementing the information and communication measures, and the exchange of good practices. Each management authority will use the EU information network’s Europe Direct Centres effectively in the implementation of information and communication activities at a local and regional level.
Amendment 1693 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 120 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall reimburse as interim payments 9
source: PE-491.057
2012/08/06
REGI
2 amendments...
Amendment 1905 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex -I (new) – Part 1 – Section 1.2 – Paragraph 1.2.4 a (new) 1.2.4a. EMFF will help to achieve the growth, jobs and sustainability objectives of the reformed Common Fisheries Policy and will support the implementation of the EU Integrated Maritime Policy. The EMFF can finance sustainable fisheries and aquaculture, contributing to sustainable marine ecosystems and inclusive territorial development and management
Amendment 1954 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex -I (new) – Part 1 – Section 2.1 – Paragraph 2.1.1 2.1.1 With a view to achieving optimal results for sustainable growth and development on the ground, it is important to coordinate all Union policies and their instruments which play a role in achieving economic, social and territorial cohesion and a better balanced territorial development in the EU. This must also be reflected in better coordination between the Union budget and the Member States' national and sub-national budgets in strengthening the integration and effectiveness of policies and the control over public finance balances, and in financing common political priorities as well as in improved vertical cooperation between the EU and national and regional entities.
source: PE-491.163
|
| 87 |
2011/0380(COD) European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) 2014-2020
2013/01/17
PECH
87 amendments...
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The success of the Common Fisheries Policy depends on an effective system of control, inspection, including workplace inspections and enforcement as well as on reliable complete data, both for scientific advice and for implementation and control purposes; therefore the EMFF should support these policies.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7) a) the EMFF must contribute to improving the standards of living for those who depend on fishing, guaranteeing better working standards for fishermen, in particular through respect of the legislation on health and safety in the workplace and the provisions stipulated by collective labour agreements.
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 b (new) (7) b) In order to avoid confusion about the application and impact of specific financial measures of the EMFF on the various stakeholders who participate in the fishing sector, it will be useful to introduce a clear distinction between the ship owner and wage-earning fishermen, as has already been set forth in ILO Convention no. 188.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The overall objective of the Common Fisheries Policy is to ensure that fishing and aquaculture activities contribute to long-term sustainable environmental and social conditions which are necessary for economic
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9) a) The measures financed through the EMFF should comply with articles 39 and 41 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, referring to a balanced approach in the use of labour law and effective coordination as regards vocational training.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31) In order to increase the competitiveness and economic performance of fishing activities it is vital to stimulate innovation and entrepreneurship. Therefore the EMFF should support innovative operations and
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) Investment in human capital is also vital to increase the competitiveness and economic performance of fishing and maritime activities. Therefore, the EMFF should support integration between the education and training system and businesses in the sector, initial training, qualifications and retraining, as well as lifelong learning, co-
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) Conscious of the weak presence of
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 a (new) (34) a) Support for the development and implementation of multiannual plans (Articles 9-11 of the Regulation on the Common Fisheries Policy)
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 (41) It is paramount to integrate environmental concerns into the EMFF and support the implementation of conservation measures under the CFP taking however into account the diverse conditions throughout the Union waters. For this purpose it is essential to develop a regionalised approach to conservation measures, in which the Member States which share a type of fishing are encouraged to work together and guarantee a consistent approach in the fishing sector.
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) In line with the discard ban introduced by the CFP, the EMFF should support investments on board aiming at make the best use of unwanted fish caught and valorise underused components of the fish caught and provide training to the crews on the application of the new legislation. Considering the scarcity of the resources, in order to maximise the value of the fish caught, the EMFF should also support investments on board aiming at adding commercial value to fish caught.
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 (50) Conscious of the need to identify the most suitable areas for developing aquaculture (including inland waters, fresh water, salt water and brackish water), taking into account access to waters and space, the EMFF should support national authorities in making their strategic choices at national level.
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) Investment in human capital is also vital to increase the competitiveness and economic performance of aquaculture activities. Therefore, the EMFF should support lifelong learning and networking stimulating the dissemination and exchange of knowledge a
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 a (new) (51) a) Given the need to identify geographical areas with a greater potential for the development of aquaculture in terms of access to both water and land, the EMFF should support the national and regional authorities in their strategic choices, particularly regarding the definition and mapping of the zones which may be considered most suitable to the development of aquaculture, taking into account, if relevant, the maritime spatial planning process.
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 (52) In order to promote environmentally sustainable aquaculture, the EMFF should support aquaculture activities which are highly respectful of the environment, the conversion of aquaculture enterprises to eco-management, measures intended to encourage the use of renewable energy sources, the use of audit schemes as well as the conversion to organic aquaculture. In the same vein, the EMFF should also support aquaculture providing for special environmental services, including the conservation and development of wetlands.
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 a (new) (53 a) The EMFF should support the establishment a coherent network of fish stock recovery areas, in which all fishing activities are prohibited, and which include areas important for fish productivity, in particular nursery grounds, spawning grounds and feeding grounds for fish stocks.
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 55 (55) Considering that the community-led approach for local development has, over a number of years, proven its utility in promoting the development of fisheries, aquaculture and rural areas by fully taking into account the multi-sectoral needs for endogenous development, support should be continued and reinforced in the future.
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 80 (80) The EMFF should also support sustainable economic growth, employment, innovation and competitiveness within maritime sectors and in coastal regions. It is particularly important to identify regulatory barriers and skill deficiencies hindering growth in emerging and prospective maritime sectors, as well as operations aimed at fostering investment in technological innovation necessary to enhance the business potential of marine and maritime applications. The EMFF shall support measures to develop the education and vocational training system in the sector, including by acquiring the equipment and tools needed to improve the quality of education and training services.
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 5 a (new) (5a) 'fish stock recovery area' means a clearly defined geographical area within a Member State's territorial waters in which all fishing activities are prohibited;
Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 19 a (new) (19 a) ‘fishing tourism’ means a supplementary activity carried out by professional fishermen whereby persons who are not crew members board fishing vessels as tourists or researchers. This activity may include the provision of on- board meals.
Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 19 b (new) (19b) «Τraditional fishing vessel» refers to a vessel that is built with a typology in hull form, construction and material, which remained unchanged for at least 100 years, be able to navigate and continue to carry out fishing activities compatible with the European and national rules currently in force.
Amendment 551 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) promote the economic, social and environmental sustainability of fishing and aquaculture activities;
Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (cb) supporting measures to facilitate access to credit and venture capital for fishing businesses;
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) promotion of economic growth, social inclusion, creation of jobs and supporting labour mobility in coastal and inland communities depending on fishing and aquaculture
Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new) (aa) promotion of the transfer between generations;
Amendment 584 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a b (new) (ab) promotion of the multifunctionality of fishing businesses
Amendment 588 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b (b) diversification of fisheries activities into other sectors of maritime economy and growth of maritime economy, including mitigation of climate change
Amendment 619 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b b (new) (bb) preserve or maintain operational traditional vessels and shipyards that pertain to the protection of maritime heritage;
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c (c) development of new professional skills and lifelong learning through the development of a system for education and vocational training, in particular through initial training, qualification, specialisation and retraining;
Amendment 637 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – introductory part (3) Fostering innovative, competitive and
Amendment 649 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c (c) development of new professional skills and lifelong learning with particular reference to young aquaculture farmers;
Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d a (new) (da) promotion of activities involving the processing of aquaculture products
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d b (new) (db) supporting and promoting local aquaculture products
Amendment 683 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – introductory part (5) Promoting a sustainable, organic and resource efficient aquaculture through the focus on the following areas:
Amendment 688 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b (b) promotion of aquaculture with high level of environmental protection and of animal health and welfare and of public health and safety
Amendment 700 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b a (new) (bb) training fishermen in on-board safety
Amendment 724 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) operators that have had their fishing licence suspended more than twice, in accordance with Article 92(3), that have committed a serious infringement under 42 of the Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 or Article 90(1) of the Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009;
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) the identification of the period of time during which operators are inadmissible for support referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 which shall be proportionate to the seriousness or to the repetition of the infringement or non-
Amendment 762 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) construction of new fishing vessels,
Amendment 782 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 794 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 896 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) a demonstration of a pertinent approach integrated into the programme towards innovation, the environment, including the specific needs of Natura 2000 areas, the establishment of fish stock recovery areas and climate change mitigation and adaptation;
Amendment 1011 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the provision of professional advice on business and marketing strategies, including advice on promotion, marketing and public relations.
Amendment 1047 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 1057 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) networking and exchange of experience and best practice between stakeholders including among training organisations and those promoting equal opportunities between men and women;
Amendment 1058 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) promoting the social dialogue at national, regional
Amendment 1062 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) development initiatives in the fisheries or aquaculture sector by young operators working on their own or in partnership.
Amendment 1086 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) business start-ups
Amendment 1096 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) retrofitting of small scale coastal fishing vessels in order to reassign them for activities outside or supplementary to fishing.
Amendment 1154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. In order to facilitate access for businesses to credit and venture capital, within the scope of their own operational programmes, Member States may consider cofinancing expenditure on operations which provide for contributions to support financial engineering instruments for businesses, mainly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), including micro- enterprises, such as venture capital funds, guarantee funds and loan funds, as well as through holding funds.
Amendment 1167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 1. In order to improve working, health and living conditions on board for fishermen on fishing vessels the EMFF may support investments, including on board or in individual equipments, providing that these investments go beyond standards required under national or Union law. The EMFF may also support measures for advice and technical assistance concerning the management of health and safety on board with a view to improving organisation on board, preventing accidents or mishaps on board and disseminating good practice relating to prevention.
Amendment 1182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The EMFF should support research into innovative safety devices.
Amendment 1183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Support shall be granted for the total renovation of vessels more than 40 years old which meet the following conditions: halving of fishing effort, proven reduction in engine power, use of selective fishing gear.
Amendment 1190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 a (new) Article 33a Measures for the reduction of fishing effort 1. The EMFF may contribute to the funding of aid measures for the temporary cessation of fishing activities to support fishermen and owners of fishing vessels. 2. The duration of the measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall be determined on the basis of the best available scientific research on the status of stocks.
Amendment 1206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – title Support
Amendment 1247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 a (new) Article 34a Supporting the development and implementation of multiannual plans 1. In order to ensure that the multiannual plans are successfully implemented within the framework of Articles 9 - 11 of the regulation on the common fisheries policy, the EMFF may support: (a) participation by stakeholders in the planning and development of the multiannual plans; (b) implementation of the multiannual plans; (c) management of the multiannual plans. The aid referred to in Article 1(c) may only be granted to public authorities.
Amendment 1250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In order to ensure efficient implementation of the CFP’s priorities on regionalisation and conservation measures under Articles 17 and 21 of the [Regulation on Common Fisheries Policy] the EMFF may support:
Amendment 1261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) stakeholder participation in designing and implementing multiannual plans in accordance with Article 9 to 11 of the CFP Regulation and conservation measures in the meaning of Articles 17 and 21 of the [Regulation on Common Fisheries Policy]
Amendment 1274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In order to reduce the impact of fishing on the marine environment, foster the elimination of discards and facilitate the transition to sustainable exploitation of living marine biological resources that restores and maintains populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the MSY, the EMFF may support investments in equipment, instruments and systems:
Amendment 1291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) eliminating or reducing discards;
Amendment 1299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 2. Support shall not be granted more than once during the programming period for the same Union fishing vessel and for the same type of equipment, instrument or system.
Amendment 1303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 3 3. Support shall only be granted when the gear or other equipment, instruments or systems referred under paragraph 1 ha
Amendment 1308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) fishermen who own the gear, instruments or systems to be replaced and who have worked on board of a Union fishing vessel for at least 60 days during the two years preceding the date of submission of the application;
Amendment 1348 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) identification, classification, selection, management, restoration and monitoring of marine protected areas in view of the implementation of the spatial protection measures referred to in Article 13(4) of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2008/56/EC;
Amendment 1352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) ea. In order to secure the conservation of living aquatic resources and marine ecosystems, and as part of a precautionary approach, Member States shall establish a coherent network of fish stock recovery areas in which all fishing activities are prohibited, including in particular areas important for fish reproduction. Member States shall identify and designate the areas that are necessary to establish a coherent network of fish stock recovery areas, together with the scientific community, and producer organization representatives of the fishermen concerned and in concertation with the Advisory Council.
Amendment 1355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the participation in other actions aimed at maintaining and enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem services within the framework for EU action in the field of marine environment policy, such as the restoration of specific marine and coastal habitats in support of sustainable fish stocks.
Amendment 1478 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 a (new) Article 41 a Protection of maritime heritage 1. In order to support and promote traditional maritime crafts related to fisheries and preserve or maintain operational the vessels that pertain to the protection of the maritime heritage of a Member State, the EMFF may support: (a) training and investments for the support of traditional shipyards and traditional maritime crafts; (b) investments onboard aimed at restoring traditional wooden fishing vessels without increasing the fishing capacity of the vessel; (c) Investments for the safekeeping and maintenance of traditional fishing vessels that pertain to the protection of maritime heritage and have been decommissioned. 2. Support shall only be granted to the owners of shipyards and fishing vessels and not more than once during the programming period for the same fishing vessel. 3. Member States shall ensure that vessels receiving support under paragraph 1 (b) continue to operate.
Amendment 1548 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) developing or introducing in the market new or substantially improved products compared to the state of art, including native species with good market potential, new or improved processes, new or improved management and organisation systems.
Amendment 1613 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) diversification of the income of aquaculture enterprises through the development of new native aquaculture species with good market and environmental prospects;
Amendment 1646 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 3 3. Support under paragraph (1)(a) shall only be granted to public law bodies selected to set up the farm advisory services. Support under paragraph (1)(b) shall only be granted to aquaculture SMEs or aquaculture producer's organisations or industry associations.
Amendment 1689 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 1 1. In order to foster entrepreneurship in aquaculture, the EMFF may support the setting up of aquaculture enterprises by new starting farmers, with particular focus on the entry of micro enterprises, young farmers and female entrepreneurs.
Amendment 1694 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 2 – point -a (new) (-a) primarily develop the aquaculture of herbivorous species, producing food for human consumption;
Amendment 1695 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) possess adequate professional skills and competence, that is, possess a professional qualification recognised under the EQF (European Qualification Framework) system;
Amendment 1716 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the restoration of existing aquaculture ponds or lagoons and connected habitats, through removal of silt
Amendment 1741 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) forms of extensive aquaculture, including forms of aquaculture in wetlands, enabling conservation and improvement of the environment, biodiversity, and management of the landscape and traditional features of aquaculture zones.
Amendment 1768 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the development of general and species specific best practices or codes of conducts on bio-security
Amendment 1769 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) increasing the availability of veterinary medicines, including vaccines, for its use in aquaculture and promoting appropriate use of such medicines through the commissioning of pharmaceutical studies and the dissemination and exchange of information.
Amendment 1791 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) environmental pollution
Amendment 1832 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of the EMFF, the integrated local development strategy referred to in Article 28(1)(c) of [Regulation (EU) No […] laying down Common Provisions] shall be based on the interaction and consultation between actors and projects of different sectors of the local economy, in particular the fisheries and aquaculture sectors
Amendment 1861 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 2 2. Local action groups may request the payment of an advance from the competent paying agency if such possibility is provided for in the operational programme. The amount of the advances shall not exceed 50% of the public support
Amendment 2140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) in order to improve both cooperation with neighbouring countries and the management of shared stocks, sustainable fisheries cooperation agreements shall be concluded with these countries; these cooperation agreements shall aim not at obtaining fishing rights for EU vessels but at achieving a situation where the EU could provide funding and technical support with the aim of attaining comparable sustainable management rules as the EU in the third partner country;
Amendment 2143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) promoting cross-sectoral cooperation platforms and networks, including representatives of public authorities, regional and local authorities, industry, the tourism sector, research stakeholders, citizens, civil society organisations and the social partners, in particular in the framework of sea-basin strategies;
Amendment 2155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) promoting the protection of the marine environment, in particular its biodiversity and marine protected areas such as Natura 2000 sites, and the sustainable use of marine and coastal resources, a
Amendment 2165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 82 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) training projects for the development of knowledge, professional qualifications and measures aimed at promoting professional development in the maritime sector
Amendment 2167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 82 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new) (fb) provide/identify suitable instruments for integrated coastal zone management, maritime spatial planning and the management of resources shared at sea- basin level
Amendment 2170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 82 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) activities of coordination and cooperation among Member States and, where appropriate, between Member States and regions, to develop maritime spatial planning and integrated coastal zone management, including expenditure related to systems and practices of data sharing and monitoring, evaluation activities, the setting up and running of networks of experts, and the setting up of a programme aiming at building capacity for Member States to implement maritime spatial planning;
Amendment 2174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) specific control and enforcement measures under CFP
source: PE-496.422
|
| 5 |
2011/0401(COD) Horizon 2020 - Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020
2012/07/24
PECH
5 amendments...
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – paragraph 14 – point b (b) Food security, sustainable agriculture, sustainable aquaculture and fishing, marine and maritime research, and the bio- economy;
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 1 Agriculture, forestry
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point c – introductory part (c) Unlocking the potential of aquatic living resources by implementing an ecosystem approach to fishing and aquaculture
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point c – paragraph 1 The aim is to sustainably exploit aquatic living resources to maximise social and economic benefits/returns from Europe's oceans and seas and inland waters (fresh water, salt water and brackish water). The activities shall focus on an optimal contribution to secure food supplies by developing sustainable and environmentally friendly fisheries and competitive European aquaculture in the context of the global economy and on boosting marine innovation through biotechnology to fuel smart ‘blue’ growth, in respect of the precautionary principle.
source: PE-492.798
|
| 6 |
2011/0409(COD) Sound level of motor vehicles
2012/06/13
ENVI
6 amendments...
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) In order to reduce road traffic noise, public authorities may put in place measures and incentives to accelerate the purchase and use of quieter vehicles.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) The Commission should examine the potential of active safety systems in more silent vehicles such as hybrid and electric vehicles to better serve the objective of improving the safety of vulnerable road users in urban areas, such as blind, visually and auditorily challenged pedestrians, cyclists and children.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new) (21a) 'point of sale' means a location where vehicles are offered for sale to consumers.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 21 b (new) (21b) 'technical promotional material' means technical manuals, brochures and catalogues (whether these appear in printed, electronic or online form), as well as websites, the purpose of which is to market vehicles to customers.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. In the application for type-approval, the manufacturer shall provide a statement, supported by the outcome of appropriate test results established in accordance with the model set out in Appendix 1 of Annex VIII, that the vehicle type to be approved complies with the requirements of Article 8
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 a (new) Article 13a Review The Commission shall assess the need to review this Regulation, taking into account, inter alia, whether active safety systems can better serve the objective of improving the safety of vulnerable road users in urban areas, in addition to, or as compared to acoustic vehicle alerting systems.
source: PE-491.112
|
| 2 |
2011/2096(INI) Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system
2011/09/21
ITRE
2 amendments...
Amendment 353 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 – the Commission to submit a proposal for rules governing port services by 2014, with specific reference to technical-nautical services a regulation of market access and of their functioning is still necessary to safeguard the safety of navigation, the security and the environmental protection;
Amendment 356 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 bis (new) - the introduction of a real European policy for short and medium shipping, in order to permit a massive modal shift from road to sea transport and thus achieve the EU objectives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the transport sector; - a European scheme to be studied and tested based on granting support for all ships using biofuel;
source: PE-472.267
|
| 32 |
2011/2290(INI) Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy - overarching communication
2012/09/05
PECH
32 amendments...
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the common fisheries policy (wild fisheries and aquaculture sector) needs a thorough and ambitious reform if the EU is to
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that incentives should be offered to those who fish sustainably using environment
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Is convinced that the reform of the CFP must establish the right instruments to support an ecosystem-based fisheries management; believes, therefore, that the multiannual management plans must take account of such an ecosystemic approach
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Supports the management of fisheries resources on the basis of MSY by 2015, meaning by MSY "the average or maximum catch that can be removed under existing environmental conditions, over an indefinite period, without causing the stock to be depleted, assuming that removals and natural mortality are balanced by stable recruitment and growth", in order to phase out overfishing and achieve sustainable stock conservation;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Believes necessary, in order to achieve a gradual elimination of discards, to stress the difference between discards and bycatch, the former intended as the portion of the total catch which is dumped or thrown overboard at sea (they are generally considered a waste of fish resources and inconsistent with responsible fisheries); the latter as the total catch of non-target animals (in multispecies/multigear fisheries bycatch generally refers to that part of the catch that should not have been caught, while in specific fisheries includes catching no- target species and size, protected, endangered or threatened species, juveniles fish and organisms for which there is no intended use). In this aim it will be important to have a differentiated management approach.
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that a
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the need
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls on the Commission to conduct pilot projects aimed at the improvement of gear selectivity on a regional fishery, by the end of 2014. The results that emerge shall be included in the long-term management plan of each fishery in the form of the compulsory use of the most selective gear available.
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes the difficulty of applying such a measure in the Mediterranean, given the existence of mixed fisheries, specific fishing practices and specific climatic and geological conditions; believes that further consultations are needed to tackle the difficulties linked to establishing the infrastructure for collecting and processing the bycatch as proposed by the Commission; calls for further measures to reduce
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Expresses its doubts over the proposals relating to the market in bycatches, and stresses that, in case of implementation, adequate safeguards should be provided in order to avoid the emergence of a parallel market that would
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Asks the Commission to
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses the
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 II - Socio-economic and enviromental sustainability
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Notes that the proposal to introduce ‘Transferable Fishing Concessions’ (TFCs), contained in the basic regulation,
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Believes that
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. Stresses that when allocating individual fishing opportunities a Member State shall give priority access to fishing vessels that fulfil transparent and objective criteria. The transparent criteria will be set by the Council and the Parliament, will be made publicly available and will include but not be limited to: (a) the employment of more selective fishing methods, gears and practices with low by-catch and low impact on the marine ecosystem; (b) have a good record of compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy and with respecting catch and/or fishing effort limits designated by scientific advice (c) ensure increased, good quality employment, provided that this does not have negative environmental impacts; (d) the use of vessels and fishing methods that have low fuel emissions and are energy efficient; and (e) the use of video surveillance or an equivalent electronic monitoring equipment, (f) working conditions that comply with relevant international standards, notably the 2007 ILO Work in Fishing Convention.
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Believes strongly that the reformed CFP must not be removed from the socio- economic and environmental context in which it exists; considers that the fisheries and aquaculture sectors must be seen as important direct and indirect sources of job creation in our maritime regions, which underpin their economy as a whole
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Considers that the fisheries sector can remain sustainable
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30 a. Believes that a clear distinction between employed fisherman and shipowner would be appropriate, in order to avoid confusion about the implementation and the impact of certain measures on the different actors involved in the fisheries sector.
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new) 30 b. Believes that the proposal for a Regulation on the CFP reform, should be interpreted by taking into account the provisions of the Regulation on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund regarding the improvement of working and living conditions, training and safety for workers in the fisheries sector.
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 b (new) 31 b. Believes that the reform should be an opportunity to significantly move towards a renewed cooperation between the scientific community, industry and social partners, in orde to implement the process of regionalization.
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Believes that as far as regionalisation is concerned, the key response is good governance, which means a bottom-up approach; stresses that clear and simple rules must be established at the appropriate level, thus increasing compliance; also strongly believes that the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs)
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Believes, more generally, that the role of the RACs should be strengthened; in this respect, urges the Commission to table a new proposal aimed at strengthening the participation of stakeholders and small- scale fisheries, thus leading to genuine regionalisation in the CFP; welcomes, in this regard, the Commission's proposal to set up a Black Sea Advisory Council and the Advisory Council for Aquaculture.Their composition should be established according to the ordinary legislative procedure and the Art. 43.2 of TFEU. ;
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Believes, more generally, that the role of the RACs should be strengthened; in this respect,
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Stresses that an ambitious and real reform of the CFP can only be successful if sufficient financial means are available for the next ten years, in order to support all the reform measures and tackle the socio- economic and environmental problems that may occur;
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 b (new) 34 b. Believes that the principle of coherence is a key theme for the Union. Each sector policy must, in fact, be in harmony with all other sectorial policies and spirit of the treaties. The external dimension of the CFP, in particular, should prove to be consistent with five other EU sectorial policies of equal importance: 1. trade policy; 2. policy development; 3. environmental policy; 4. maritime policy; 5. the Neighbourhood Policy. To this end asks the Commission, having delegated executive tasks related to the CFP, to enhance a dialogue and a greater participation among the various DG's. Because of its unique cross-border nature, the external dimension of the CFP necessarily imply a greater involvement of institutional actors dealing with other relevant sectorial policies.
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 c (new) 34 c. Stresses that EU should develop a specific strategy in the field of fisheries and management of living marine resources, involving all non-European Mediterranean coastal States. The period of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) reform coincides with a historical moment of particular importance for the Mediterranean: the Arab spring has, in fact, changed the policy framework of many countries on the southern shore, starting a new phase of relations with the European Union (EU).
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 d (new) 34 d. Asks that EU shall aim at concluding, as soon as possible, Sustainable Fisheries Cooperation Agreements with neighbouring countries where the EU provides funding and technical support in order to achieve a more concerted and coherent policy, with the aim of a harmonised and sustainable fisheries policy in all shared sea basins, therefore increasing the effectiveness of the CFP in all the regions concerned. These agreements shall be concluded in the spirit of a fair and equitable cooperation and the respect of human rights and shall aim at sharing responsibilities fairly between the Union and the respective partner country.
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 e (new) 34 e. In order to improve the cooperation with neighboring countries and to improve the management of shared stocks, the EU should aim at concluding sustainable fisheries cooperation agreements with these countries. These cooperation agreements should not aim at obtaining fishing rights for EU vessels but should aim at achieving a situation where the EU provides funding and technical suppor in exchange for the application of the same or comparable sustainable management rules as the EU in the third partner country.
Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 f (new) 34 f. Believes that an effort should be made at EU level to monitor the activities of the EU fleets that operate in non- EU waters outside the framework of fisheries agreements, as these should respect the same guiding principles applied to those fishing in the EU. We believe that concrete measures should be put forward to ensure that working conditions for crew members domiciled outside the EU and working on-board vessels flying an EU flag should be equal to those of workers domiciled in the EU.
source: PE-489.362
|
| 1 |
2011/2291(INI) Reporting obligations under Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the CFP
2012/03/29
PECH
1 amendments...
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In order to preserve living resources, ensuring long-term environmental sustainability, calls on the Commission to introduce, in the multi-annual management plans, a substantial European network of areas closed to fishing, managed and planned spatially by the competent national authorities in agreement with the interested parties;
source: PE-485.898
|
| 5 |
2011/2292(INI) Small scale and artisanal fisheries and the CFP reform
2012/08/05
PECH
5 amendments...
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that small-scale fishing should be the subject of differentiated treatment, with management systems and models adapted to its specific characteristics and problems; This in no way excludes small- scale fisheries from the strict application of the rules and the achievement of the objectives set by the CFP;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Rejects a definition of small-scale fishing that is restrictive and detached from reality; considers that the definition of small-scale fishing should cover a range of criteria, in addition to the strict boat-size criterion, including, inter alia, the impact of fishing techniques on the marine ecosystem, t
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Draws attention to the importance of taking into account, not only the quantity of the fleet, but also its quality; considers that the future CFP should encourage the increased sustainability of the fleet in environmental, economic and social terms, by promoting the progressive prevalence of sectors and operators that use fishing techniques with less impact on resources and the marine environment, and that benefit the communities of which they are part in terms of generating jobs and of the quality of these jobs;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Urges the Commission to work with the Member States, RACs and stakeholders to improve the definition of small-scale fishing in the EU;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 1 – renewal and modernisation of fleets with a view to making them safer, and more economically and environmentally sustainable (selection of techniques, energy efficiency, etc.), without increasing the fishing capacity of the fleet;
source: PE-487.773
|
| 6 |
2011/2318(INI) External dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy
2012/08/05
PECH
6 amendments...
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Believes that the principle of coherence is a key theme for the Union. Each sector policy must, in fact, be in harmony with all other sectorial policies and spirit of the treaties. The external dimension of the CFP, in particular, should prove to be consistent with five other EU sectorial policies of equal importance: 1. trade policy; 2. policy development; 3. environmental policy; 4. maritime policy; 5. the neighbourhood Policy. To this end asks the Commission, having delegated executive tasks related to the CFP, to enhance a dialogue and a greater participation among the various DG's. Because of its unique cross-border nature, the external dimension of the CFP necessarily imply a greater involvement of institutional actors dealing with other relevant sectorial policies.
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Stresses that EU should develop a specific strategy in the field of fisheries and management of living marine resources, involving all non-European Mediterranean coastal States. The period of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) reform coincides with a historical moment of particular importance for the Mediterranean: the Arab spring has, in fact, changed the policy framework of many countries on the southern shore, starting a new phase of relations with the European Union (EU).
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Asks that EU shall aim at concluding, as soon as possible, Sustainable Fisheries Cooperation Agreements with neighbouring countries where the EU provides funding and technical support in order to achieve a more concerted and coherent policy, with the aim of a harmonised and sustainable fisheries policy in all shared sea basins, therefore increasing the effectiveness of the CFP in all the regions concerned. These agreements shall be concluded in the spirit of a fair and equitable cooperation and the respect of human rights and shall aim at sharing responsibilities fairly between the Union and the respective partner country.
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11 b. In order to improve the cooperation with neighboring countries and to improve the management of shared stocks, the EU should aim at concluding sustainable fisheries cooperation agreements with these countries. These cooperation agreements should not aim at obtaining fishing rights for EU vessels but should aim at achieving a situation where the EU provides funding and technical support in exchange for the application of the same or comparable sustainable management rules as the EU in the third partner country.
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Believes that an effort should be made at EU level to monitor the activities of the EU fleets that operate in non- EU waters outside the framework of fisheries agreements, as these should respect the same guiding principles applied to those fishing in the EU. We believe that concrete measures should be put forward to ensure that working conditions for crew members domiciled outside the EU and working on-board vessels flying an EU flag should be equal to those of workers domiciled in the EU.
source: PE-489.341
|
| 6 |
2012/2009(DEC) Special report 12/2011 (2011 discharge): Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities?
2012/04/06
PECH
6 amendments...
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) indicates other instruments of the common fisheries policy as possible ways of reducing fishing capacity and, purely by way of example, analyses transferable fishing concessions without identifying beneficial effects in them;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) denounces the inadequacy of the information supplied by Member States and the consequent difficulties in identifying policies which can reduce fishing over-capacity and in assessing the results of such policies.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – point d a (new) (da) collecting data, for which purpose it is desirable to increase the rate of EU cofinancing;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – point d b (new) (db) planning targeted scrapping per area.
source: PE-491.084
|
| 5 |
2012/2261(INI) Strategy for fisheries in the Adriatic and Ionian Seas
2013/04/16
PECH
5 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas the geo-physical features of the Ionian sea basin are similar to those of the rest of the Mediterranean, in particular GSA 18 and 19, which reach depths of up to 2000 metres;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Commission to adopt, at the earliest opportunity and by 2013 at the latest, the action plan for the practical implementation on a macro-regional basis of the maritime strategy for the Adriatic Sea and the Ionian Sea, pointing out that the fisheries sector should form one of the priorities of that strategy, taking account of the specific geo-physical features;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to propose that specific advisory bodies for the Adriatic Sea and the Ionian Sea should be set up within the Regional Advisory Council (RAC) already established for the Mediterranean area, drawing on the positive experience gained with the ‘maritime districts’ that have been set up in Italy
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
source: PE-508.018
|
Guido MILANA on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |