Pat the Cope GALLAGHER
Constituencies
-
Ireland
Fianna Fáil Party
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
Ireland
Fianna Fáil Party
1999/07/20 - 2002/06/17
-
Ireland
Fianna Fáil Party
1999/07/20 - 2002/06/17
-
Ireland
Fianna Fáil Party
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
-
Ireland
Fianna Fáil Party
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
Groups
-
ALDE
Member of the Bureau
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
2009/07/20 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
-
ALDE
Member
Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe
2009/07/14 - 2009/07/19
-
UEN
Treasurer
Union for Europe of the Nations Group
1999/07/20 - 2002/06/17
-
UFE
Member
Group Union for Europe
1995/07/05 - 1999/07/19
-
EDA
Member
Group of the European Democratic Alliance
1994/07/19 - 1995/07/04
- Member Group of the European Democratic Alliance 1994/07/19 - 1995/07/04
- Member Group Union for Europe 1995/07/05 - 1999/07/19
-
UEN
Treasurer
Union for Europe of the Nations Group
1999/07/20 - 2002/06/17
EP staff
- Member of Conference of Delegation Chairs 2009/09/17 - 9999/12/31
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Fisheries | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Regional Development | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chair of | Delegation for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2009/09/17 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2009/09/16 | 2009/09/16 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2002/02/07 | 2002/06/17 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 1999/09/30 | 2002/01/14 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway | 1999/02/24 | 1999/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with South-east Europe | 1999/02/24 | 1999/07/19 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway | 1997/10/14 | 1999/02/23 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with South-east Europe | 1997/10/14 | 1999/02/23 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway | 1997/01/16 | 1997/10/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with South-east Europe | 1997/02/18 | 1997/10/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf States | 1995/07/12 | 1997/01/15 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf States | 1994/11/17 | 1995/07/11 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf States | 1994/11/17 | 1995/07/11 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf States | 1995/07/12 | 1997/01/15 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway | 1997/01/16 | 1997/10/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with South-east Europe | 1997/02/18 | 1997/10/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway | 1997/10/14 | 1999/02/23 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with South-east Europe | 1997/10/14 | 1999/02/23 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway | 1999/02/24 | 1999/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with South-east Europe | 1999/02/24 | 1999/07/19 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 1999/09/30 | 2002/01/14 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2002/02/07 | 2002/06/17 |
Contact
Online
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45591
- Fax
- +322 28 49591
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 10G305
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75591
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79591
- Office
- Bât. Winston Churchill M02036
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- European Parliament
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 10G305
- B-1047 Brussels
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2012/0232(COD) | Fishery resources: technical and control measures in the Skagerrak |
| Shadow | 2012/0229(NLE) | EC/Kiribati Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution; EU/Kiribati Protocol from 16 September 2012 to 15 September 2015 |
| Shadow | 2012/0215(NLE) | EU/Mauritius Fisheries Partnership Agreement and Protocol: fishing opportunities and financial contribution |
| Shadow | 2012/0208(COD) | Conservation of fishery resources through technical measures: alignment of the Regulation with the TFEU (Commission delegated and implementing powers) |
| Shadow | 2012/0201(COD) | Fishery resources: recovery of the European eel stock; aligning the Regulation with the TFEU (Commission delegated and implementing powers) |
| Shadow | 2012/0179(COD) | Fishing in the North-East Atlantic: specific conditions to fishing for deep-sea stocks, provisions for fishing in international waters |
| Responsible | 2012/0158(COD) | Conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms; herring for industrial purposes |
| Shadow | 2012/0130(NLE) | EC/Denmark/Greenland Fisheries Parnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2015. Protocol |
| Shadow | 2011/2292(INI) | Small scale and artisanal fisheries and the CFP reform |
| Responsible | 2011/0434(COD) | Conservation of fish stocks: measures in relation to countries allowing non-sustainable fishing |
| Shadow | 2011/0195(COD) | Common Fisheries Policy |
| Shadow | 2011/0194(COD) | Common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products |
| Responsible | 2011/0097(NLE) | EC/Cape Verde Fisheries Partnership Agreement: fishing opportunities and financial contribution. EU/Cape Verde Protocol from 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2014 |
| Opinion | 2010/2184(DEC) | 2009 discharge: Community Fisheries Control Agency CFCA |
| Opinion | 2010/0129(NLE) | EU/Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway Agreements: Financial Mechanisms 2009-2014 and imports of certain fish and fisheries products 2009-2014 |
| Responsible | 2010/0084(NLE) | EU/Chile Agreement: conservation of swordfish stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean |
| Shadow | 2009/2107(INI) | A new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture |
| Responsible | 2009/0057(COD) | Conservation of fishery resources: western stock of Atlantic horse mackerel and the fisheries exploiting that stock. Multi-annual plan |
| Responsible | 2001/0246(CNS) | EC/Mauritania fisheries agreement: protocol for the period from 1st August 2001 to 31 July 2006 |
| Responsible | 2001/0168(CNS) | EC/Senegal fisheries agreement: periods from 1st May to 31 July 2001 and 1st August to 31 December 2001 |
| Opinion | 2000/2070(COS) | Common fisheries policy after 2002: meetings at regional level in 1998-1999. Report |
| Responsible | 2000/2069(COS) | Fisheries and aquaculture: Community system 1996-1998 (Regulation (EEC) No 3760/92). Report |
| Opinion | 2000/2027(INI) | The common fisheries policy and the challenge of globalisation of the economy |
| Responsible | 2000/0287(CNS) | EC/Equatorial Guinea fisheries agreement: protocol from 1st July 2000 to 30 June 2001 |
| Opinion | 2000/0182(COD) | Products of animal origin, human consumption: health rules (amend. Directives 89/662/EEC, 91/67/EEC). Food hygiene package |
| Opinion | 2000/0181(CNS) | Products of animal origin intended for human consumption: animal-health rules |
| Opinion | 2000/0180(COD) | Products of animal origin intended for human consumption: organisation of official controls |
| Opinion | 2000/0179(COD) | Protection of human health: food of animal origin, specific hygiene rules |
| Opinion | 2000/0178(COD) | Protection of human health: hygiene of foodstuffs |
| Responsible | 1999/0222(CNS) | Conservation of fishery resources: juveniles of marine organisms (4th amend. Regulations (EC) No 1626/94 and (EC) No 850/98) |
| Opinion | 1999/0163(CNS) | Common fisheries policy: closer dialogue with industry and groups concerned |
| Responsible | 1999/0081(CNS) | Conservation of fishery resources: protection of juveniles of marine organisms (3rd amend. Regulation (EC) No 850/98) |
| Responsible | 1998/2164(INI) | Regionalization of the Common Fisheries Policy |
| Responsible | 1998/0217(CNS) | EC/Madagascar fisheries agreement: protocol for the period from 21 May 1998 to 20 May 2001 |
| Opinion | 1997/2189(INI) | Structural Fund: use of resources |
| Opinion | 1997/2188(INI) | Problems of the European Union's island regions |
| Opinion | 1997/2185(COS) | AGENDA 2000: economic and social cohesion |
| Responsible | 1997/0035(CNS) | EC-Mauritius fisheries agreement: protocol for the period from 1st December 1996 to 30 November 1999 |
| Opinion | 1996/0102(CNS) | Premium to sheep producers in non less-favoured areas of Ireland and Northern Ireland |
| Responsible | 1995/2323(COS) | Implementation of technical measures in the common fisheries policy |
| Responsible | 1995/0058(CNS) | Fisheries sector: arrangements regarding Community structural assistance (amend Regul. 3699/93/EEC) ) |
| Opinion | 1994/2210(COS) | A support programme for peace and reconciliation in Northern Ireland |
| Opinion | 1994/0204(CNS) | Tobacco products: excise duties (direct. 72/464/EEC and 79/32/EEC). Codification |
Born
1948/03/10 Dungloe (Co. Donegal)- B.Comm, National University Of Ireland, Galway (1970).
- Fish exporter (1970-1982).
- Member of Donegal County Council (1979- 1991), Chairman, Donegal County Council, (1985-1986).
- Member of Dáil Éireann (1981-2009);
- Minister of State at the Department of the Marine and the Department of the Gaeltacht (1987-1994).
- Minister of State at the Department of the Environment (2002-2004).
- Minister of State with special responsibility for the Marine (2004-2006).
- Minister of State at the Department of Transport (2006-2007);
- Minister of State with special responsibility for Health Promotion and Food Safety (2007-2008)
- Chairman of the Joint Committee on Arts, Sport, Tourism, (2008-2009).
- Member of the European Parliament (1994-2002) (2009-present).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 4 |
2009/0057(CNS)
2009/11/23
PECH
4 amendments...
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. In order to fish for western horse mackerel, vessels shall hold a
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Without prejudice to Chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008, this Article shall also apply to third-country fishing vessels.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The provisions of Article 11 shall apply from the date of entry into force of detailed rules implementing Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No .../2009 (the Control Regulation).
source: PE-430.353
|
| 17 |
2009/2106(INI) Green Paper on reform of the common fisheries policy
2009/12/17
PECH
17 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) C a. whereas the Council in its Resolution of the 3rd November 1976, in particular Annex VII thereto provided for safeguarding the particular needs of regions where local populations are especially dependent on fisheries and related activities,
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that despite having been extensively reformed in 2002, the CFP, 27 years after its establishment, is faced with serious problems whose main features are overfishing, overcapacity which needs to be clearly defined, overinvestment and waste, with additional aspects, such as the economic and social regression, currently affecting the sector, globalisation of the fisheries and aquaculture market and the consequences of climate change;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Points out that Parliament has in previous terms drawn attention to the fact that CFP rules were not being sufficiently complied with and
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Stresses that many of the problems faced by the CFP stem from a failure to implement the principles of good governance;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Calls for the MSY objective to be implemented in an appropriate manner taking into account that it can be interpreted in various ways and that it can be difficult to achieve in mixed fisheries. It is advisable to implement this objective in an operational manner, to base it on scientific data and to measure the socio- economic consequences that it entails;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Calls on the Commission to clearly define overcapacity; it is necessary to ascertain the reasons for overcapacity and in particular the economic drivers for capacity and to explore possible links with the market policy, mindful that in certain cases, the market forces can represent a key criterion to be taken into account; a Commission study per marine region and fleet segment, identifying criteria other than the sole gross tonnage and power to measure and define capacity should be undertaken;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Points to the need for greater investment in research and scientific knowledge in the fisheries field, and for the fisheries sector to be dovetailed more effectively into the subject areas covered by the framework programmes to promote research; it is essential that uncertainties in the scientific assessments are reduced and that appropriate social and economic data is generated and incorporated into the assessments; incorporating information by stakeholders into the assessments should be pursued;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Maintains that the exploitation of fish stocks has to be based on the principle of maximum sustainable yield, accepting that it may not be possible to hold all stocks at MSY simultaneously;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Urges the Commission to recognise the specific features of, and the differences between, the ORs, and to remote island communities who rely almost entirely on fishery for their economic survival and to promote support measures geared to the biological and social sustainability of fisheries in those regions;
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges the Commission to draw up a specific Community support programme for
Amendment 281 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Maintains that the
Amendment 300 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Urges the Commission to carefully explore the possibility of adopting new fisheries management mechanisms, as opposed to the TAC and quota system, for example fishing effort management and the use of transferable fishing rights, since such arrangements would enable the fleet to be adapted in a more flexible way, in line with the actual diversity and distribution of stocks, and could be supported by structural implementing measures, without neglecting the more vulnerable small-scale sector; urges the Commission to explore what changes should be adopted to the principle of relative stability and in particular how coastal communities highly dependent on fisheries can be given preference in the share out of fisheries resources;
Amendment 324 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 a (new) 33 a. Considers that the present system of quota swaps and transfers between Member States could be streamlined to facilitate full uptake of fishing opportunities;
Amendment 325 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 Amendment 333 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34 a. Calls for Regional bodies to be established that have devolved functions and are properly constituted; such a regional approach is not appropriate to pelagic species and an alternative model should be adopted for these species; the advisory role of the RAC's should be maintained and enhanced;
Amendment 364 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37. Considers that the competitiveness of Community aquaculture should be strengthened by providing ongoing substantial support for research and technological development, planning coastal areas and river basins, so as to facilitate access to space, and encompassing the specific needs of aquaculture within EU market policy; recognises the important role played by producer organisations (POs) established under the Common Market Organisation and urges the Commission to specifically address the specialist needs and requirements of the aquaculture sector in these rules;
Amendment 374 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Calls for support to be given to investment in new fish farming technologies, including intensive systems allowing water to be recycled and offshore salt-water fish farming; recognises the scale potential that exists for offshore aquaculture and urges the Commission to examine specific mechanisms to support the development of such offshore salt water fish farming;
source: PE-430.947
|
| 4 |
2009/2107(INI) A new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture
2010/04/14
PECH
4 amendments...
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Member States to work towards a ‘maritime development plan’ and the integrated management of coastal areas, as provided for under the EU’s new maritime policy and
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Hopes that the future European Fisheries Fund in support of the reformed CFP will provide for specific budget lines for sustainable aquaculture development and support for investment in that sector to promote economic activity and employment, with a particular focus on technologically innovative plants with a lesser environmental impact (e.g. water purification systems for eliminating residues and pollutants), farms that promote fish health and sustainable forms of aquaculture;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Hopes that this Fund will take into due account the need to provide financial support for SMEs and family-run enterprises as these companies provide a vital local employment opportunity;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 source: PE-439.917
|
| 4 |
2009/2238(INI) Arrangements for importing fishery and aquaculture products into the EU with a view to the future reform of the CFP
2010/05/26
PECH
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas this drop is a result of both declining fish stocks in EU waters and the measures (rightly) put in place to limit fishing and ensure sustainable management of fish stocks
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Cannot, therefore, accept the idea – promoted through the commercial policy currently being pursued – that all tariff protection in the fishery and aquaculture production sector must eventually be abolished, a
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that, like agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture are strategic sectors with multiple functions, which
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Sees a determined policy of supporting and developing sustainable aquaculture, with a reduced environmental impact, in the EU as one of the key aspects of a strategy to reduce dependence on fishery and aquaculture imports, stimulate economic activity in the EU and offer a more plentiful and varied supply in response to the rapidly rising demand;
source: PE-441.203
|
| 3 |
2010/0255(COD) Conservation of fishery resources: transitional technical measures 1 January 2010 - 30 June 2011 (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009)
2010/12/15
PECH
3 amendments...
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Sole Article - point 1 - point b - point i b (new) Council Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009 Article 1 - paragraph 2 - point c (ib) subparagraph (c) is replaced by the following: "(c) Point 6.3 shall be replaced by the following: '6.3. By way of derogation from points 6.1 and 6.2, it shall be permitted to conduct fishing activities using inshore static nets fixed with stakes, scallop dredges, mussel dredges, draft nets and beach seines, pots and creels within the specified areas and time periods, provided that: (i) no fishing gear other than inshore static nets fixed with stakes, scallop dredges, mussel dredges, tangle nets, pots and creels are carried on board or deployed; and (ii) no fish other than salmon, shellfish, lesser spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus Canicula) and crustacea are retained on board, landed or brought ashore.'"
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Sole Article - point 1 - point b - point i e (new) Council Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009 Article 1 - paragraph 2 - point c a-c c (new) Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Sole Article - point 1 - point b - point ii a (new) Council Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009 Article 1 - paragraph 2 - point g a (new) source: PE-454.682
|
| 7 |
2010/2211(INI) Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe
2011/05/04
SURE
5 amendments...
Amendment 644 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 63 63. Stresses that the EAV of cohesion policy is uncontested, as this policy constitutes a well-established mechanism of delivering growth and jobs and has been one of the Union’s most significant, visible, and successful policies for decades; welcomes the proposal from the European Commission that every region of the Union will benefit directly from cohesion policy; points out, however, that a modern cohesion policy must undertake a number of structural reforms, respond to the new challenges facing the Union, and promote synergies with other policies and instruments on the ground;
Amendment 690 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 66 66. Requests that the Commission draws up concrete proposals to ensure a stronger thematic concentration of cohesion funding on the Europe 2020 priorities
Amendment 711 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 68 68. Believes that cities, as functional urban areas, can play an important role in regional development and contribute to tackling the economic and social disparities on the ground; stresses, accordingly, the necessity for a strengthened and more focused approach to the urban dimension of cohesion policy;
Amendment 729 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 69. Recalls that one of the main criticisms directed at cohesion policy relates to the complexity of its rules and the disproportionate requirements on small programmes and projects; insists on the importance of simplifying the rules and procedures of this policy, on reducing complexity and administrative burdens, and on a more transparent and effective allocation of resources to cities, municipalities and regions; emphasises that
Amendment 761 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 73 73. Encourages local and regional authorities to make as much use as possible of the innovative financial instruments but requests that these instruments be simplified and configured to suit the development and administrative conditions of all regions;
source: PE-462.731
2011/08/04
SURE
2 amendments...
Amendment 474 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Calls on the Commission to present proposals for a reformed CAP, which aim at a
Amendment 515 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Points to the fact that the fisheries and aquaculture sector and its activities are often the
source: PE-462.730
|
| 23 |
2011/0194(COD) Common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products
2012/04/13
PECH
23 amendments...
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6 a) It is essential, in order for the Common Market Organisation to be a success, that consumers are informed, through marketing and educational campaigns, about the value of eating fish and the wide variety of species available, as well as told of the importance of being able to understand the information contained on labels;
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Producer organisations are the key actors for the appropriate application of the Common Fisheries Policy and the Common Market Organisation. It is therefore necessary to strengthen their objectives and to provide the necessary financial support to ensure that their members carry out fishing and aquaculture activities in a sustainable manner, improve the placing on the market of products, and collect economic information on aquaculture. When realising these objectives, producer organisations should take account the different conditions of the fishery and aquaculture sectors prevailing in the Union, in particular the specificities of small-scale fisheries.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Producer organisations
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) promoting viable and sustainable fishing activities of their members in full compliance with the conservation policy laid down in the Regulation on the Common Fisheries Policy and environmental legislation;
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) contributing to employment in the coastal areas
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) Article 7 a (ea) promoting the use of Information Communications Technology to ensure improved marketing and prices for fisheries products
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b)
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 1 Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3 Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 a (new) Article 13 a Financing of associations of producer organisations. (a) The European Maritime and Fisheries Fund may financially contribute towards the establishment and/or development of associations of producer organisations. (b) The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 50, laying down detailed rules concerning such financial support.
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) they comply with the competition rules laid down in Chapter V
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1(a) a fishery producer organisation is deemed representative where it accounts for at least
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 3 3. Within
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 1. Each producer organisation shall submit a production and marketing plan to their competent national authorities to fulfil the objectives laid down in Articles 3 and 7.
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 3. All fishery products landed, including those not complying with marketing standards, may be, under the responsibility of the Member States,
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the date of
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point c c (new) (cc) The Commission shall also undertake to ensure that in primary and second level schools across the Union, information campaigns are carried out so that younger citizens and their teachers are aware of the benefits of consuming fish, and of the huge variety of species of fish which are available for consumption;
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) make adequate market information available to
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – New entries to be inserted/added Boarfish (Caproidae) Sprat (Sprattus Sprattus) Turbot (Psetta Maxima) Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus Labrax) Argentines (Argentina Silus) Spider Crab (Maja Brachydactela) Lobster (Homarus Gammarus)
source: PE-487.716
|
| 58 |
2011/0195(COD) Common Fisheries Policy
2012/06/25
PECH
58 amendments...
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) At the World Summit on Sustainable Development at Johannesburg in 2002, the Union and its Member States committed to act against the continued decline of many fish stocks. Therefore, the Union should improve its Common Fisheries Policy to ensure that as a matter of priority exploitation levels of marine biological resources stocks are, where possible, restored and maintained at levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yields from the populations of harvested stocks by 2015. Where less scientific information is available, this may require applying proxies to maximum sustainable yield.
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The definition of small-scale fishing needs to be widened to take account of a range of criteria in addition to boat size, including, inter alia, the prevailing weather conditions, the impact of fishing techniques on the marine ecosystem, time spent at sea and the characteristics of the economic unit exploiting the resource. Small offshore islands which are dependent on fishing should be especially recognised and supported both in terms of additional resource allocation, and financially, to enable their future survival and prosperity.
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Measures are needed to reduce
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) A system of transferable fishing concessions for the majority of managed stocks under the Common Fisheries Policy
Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 a (new) (54 a) An Advisory Council for Markets shall be established in accordance with Article 52.
Amendment 627 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 2 2. The Common Fisheries Policy shall apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and shall aim to ensure, where possible, by 2015, that exploitation of living marine biological resources restores and maintains populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield.
Amendment 647 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 3 3. The Common Fisheries Policy shall implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management to ensure
Amendment 696 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) provide the necessary mechanisms for stock assessment and data collection and address the issues arising from data poor stock management;
Amendment 807 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d (d)
Amendment 826 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) a decentralised approach to the principles of good governance.
Amendment 848 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 6 – ‘maximum sustainable yield’ means the maximum catch that may be taken from a fish stock
Amendment 864 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 7 – ‘precautionary approach to fisheries management’ means an approach according to which the absence of adequate scientific information should not justify postponing or failing to take the appropriate management measures to
Amendment 873 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 8 – ‘ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management’ means an approach ensuring that benefits from living aquatic resources are high while the direct and indirect impacts of fishing operations on marine ecosystems are low
Amendment 983 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 31 a (new) – 'Fishing structural over-capacity' means the number of fishing vessels in a particular fishery or metier that are not economically viable based on the available fishing resources;
Amendment 995 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 a (new) – Fishing Maximum Sustainable Yield ( Fmsy) is the MSY as defined by a fishing mortality rate rather than a biomass rate.
Amendment 1001 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 b (new) – 'Fishing capacity' means the number of vessels in each fleet segment or metier of the European fleet.
Amendment 1029 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The status of the existing Biologically Sensitive Area as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 1954/2003 is maintained in its current form.
Amendment 1035 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – article 6 – paragraph 4 4. The provisions which will follow arrangements set out in paragraphs 2 and 3 and 3(a) shall be adopted by 31 December 2022.
Amendment 1038 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – title MEASURES FOR THE CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE EXPLOITATION OF MARINE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Amendment 1072 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) establishing incentives,
Amendment 1086 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 7 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 1098 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 7 – paragraph 1 – point h Amendment 1167 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Multiannual plans providing for conservation measures to maintain or restore fish stocks above levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield shall be established
Amendment 1219 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 4. Multiannual plans shall be based on the precautionary approach to fisheries management and shall take into account the limitations of the available data and assessment methods including data poor stock assessments and all quantified sources of uncertainty in a scientifically valid manner.
Amendment 1253 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Multiannual plans shall provide for adaptations of the fishing mortality rate, resulting where possible in a fishing mortality rate that restores and maintains all stocks above levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield
Amendment 1374 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new) (ja) conducting pilot projects on alternative types of fishing management techniques.
Amendment 1449 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) reduce and, where possible, avoid, minimise and eliminate catches of undersized individuals from fish stocks;
Amendment 1488 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. All catches of the following fish stocks subject to catch limits caught during fishing activities in Union waters or by Union fishing vessels outside Union waters following a period during which all practicable methods of avoidance and minimisation of unwanted catches have been fully explored shall be brought and retained on board the fishing vessels and recorded and landed, except when used as live bait,
Amendment 1558 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1602 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. In deciding on quota allocations each year the Council shall take full account of regions where local communities are especially dependent on fisheries and related activities as decided by the Council in its Resolution of 3 November 1976, on certain external aspects of the creation of a 200-mile fishing zone in the Community1 with effect from 1 January 1977, and in particular Annex VII thereto.
Amendment 1604 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1614 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Fishing opportunities shall comply with quantifiable targets, time frames and margins established in accordance with Article 9(2) and 11(b)
Amendment 1642 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 17 – paragraph 1 1. In a multiannual plan established pursuant to Articles 9, 10 and 11 Member States may be authorised to adopt measures
Amendment 1664 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt implementing acts to cover the scope and functions of the decentralised entities in accordance with the remit for such entities set out in Article 17 paragrapgh 1.
Amendment 1704 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 20 – title Amendment 1810 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Each Member State
Amendment 1861 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 1 1. A transferable fishing concession
Amendment 1864 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 2 2. Each Member State
Amendment 1872 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 3 3. For the allocation of transferable fishing concessions pertaining to mixed fisheries, Member States
Amendment 1919 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 1 1. Member States
Amendment 1960 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 30 – paragraph 1 Member States
Amendment 2050 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 5 – article 34 – paragraph 4 Amendment 2060 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 5 – article 35 – title Management of fishing capacity and fishing structural overcapacity
Amendment 2065 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 5 – article 35 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State fleet shall be subject to existing fishing capacity ceilings as set out in Annex II.
Amendment 2074 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 5 – article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States shall be subject to, in addition to existing fishing capacity ceilings as set out in paragraph 1, new fishing capacity levels based on new definitions of fishing capacity and fishing structural over-capacity.
Amendment 2239 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – article 42 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) In order to ensure that shared stocks with neighbouring countries are managed in a sustainable manner, it is necessary that they come within the remit of this regulation.
Amendment 2374 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 9 – article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) Establish a Markets Advisory Council.
Amendment 2387 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 9 – article 45 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (b a) Instigate trade measures against third countries not operating sustainable fishing practices.
Amendment 2414 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 10 – article 46 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (e a) a standardised compliance and enforcement regime for each EU member state.
Amendment 2420 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 10 – article 48 Amendment 2463 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 concerning amendments to that Annex to change the areas of competence, to create new areas of competence for Advisory Councils or to create new Advisory Councils including funding.
Amendment 2517 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – article 54 – paragraph 3 3. Advisory Councils may apply for Union financial assistance
Amendment 2522 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – article 54 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 concerning the composition, functioning and the fun
Amendment 2536 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 14 – article 57 – paragraph 2 2. Decision (EC) No 2004/585 is hereby repealed with effect from the entry into force of the rules adopted under Article
Amendment 2548 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – title 1 – point 8 a (new) ANNEX III ANNEX III ADVISORY COUNCILS Name of the Area of Advisory Council competence Baltic Sea ICES36 zones IIIb, IIIc and IIId IIIb, IIIc and IIId Mediterranean Maritime Waters Sea of the Mediterranean of Mediterranean of the East of line the East of line 5°36' West 5°36' West North Sea ICES zones IV and IIIa and IIIa North Western ICES zones V waters (excluding Va
Amendment 2549 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – title 1 a (new) source: PE-489.437
|
| 3 |
2011/0273(COD) European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): support to the European territorial cooperation goal
2012/04/06
REGI
3 amendments...
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part In addition to Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No […]/2012 [the ERDF Regulation],
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1a (new) In the case of any cross-border programme between Northern Ireland and the border counties of Ireland in support of peace and reconciliation, the ERDF shall also contribute to promote social and economic stability in the regions concerned, notably by actions to promote cohesion between communities.
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The above mentioned conditions shall not apply to those actions under any cross- border programme between Northern Ireland and the border counties of Ireland in support of peace and reconciliation referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 6.
source: PE-490.976
|
| 26 |
2011/0380(COD) European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) 2014-2020
2013/01/17
PECH
26 amendments...
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The Union budget should finance the Common Fisheries Policy and the Integrated Maritime Policy expenditure through a single fund, the EFMF, either directly or in the context of shared management with the Member States. Shared management with the Member States should apply not only to measures to support fisheries, aquaculture and community-led local development but also to
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) promoting sustainable and competitive fisheries and aquaculture including related processing;
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a (a) promotion of economic growth, social inclusion, creation of jobs, including related processing, and supporting labour mobility in coastal and inland communities depending on fishing and aquaculture;
Amendment 630 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d (d) improved market organisation for fishery products including the production and marketing plans referred to in Article 32 of [Regulation (EU) No on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products].
Amendment 735 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) have failed to comply with the provisions of the Data Collection Framework Regulation.
Amendment 834 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 6 6. EUR
Amendment 842 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. 7. EUR X of the resources referred to in paragraph (1) shall be allocated to the Advisory Councils referred to in Article 88.
Amendment 881 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) Each Member State shall include a production and marketing plan as referred to in Article 32 of [Regulation (EU) No on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products].
Amendment 948 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The operational programme shall include the measures to be taken to prepare production and marketing plans in accordance with Article 32 of [Regulation (EU) No on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products].
Amendment 1054 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) - Upgrade professional and technical skills; - Develop new training methods and tools; - Training that leads to improved safety and working conditions; - Training that leads to improved quality and food safety;
Amendment 1326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 5 5. Operations consisting of testing new fishing gear or techniques
Amendment 1363 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 2 2. Operations under this Article shall be implemented by public law bodies or scientific or technical bodies and shall involve fishermen or organisations of fishermen, recognised by the Member State, or non-governmental organisation in partnership with organisations of fishermen or FLAGs as defined under Article 62, and recognised by the Member State.
Amendment 1476 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Investments shall concern: a) improving the quality and freshness of landed products; b) improving conditions regarding landing, processing, storage and auction; c) measures to reduce unwanted catches, to make the best use of unwanted catches of commercial stocks, where these are landed, and to valorise underused components of fish caught; d) energy efficiency; e) environmental protection, notably the collection, storage and treatment of waste and marine waste; f) improving safety and working conditions; g) the supply of fuel, ice, water and electricity; h) fishing vessel maintenance and repair equipment; i) the construction, modernisation and extension of quays to improve safety during landing or loading; j) computerised management of fishing activities; k) the networking of fishing ports, landing sites and fish markets. l) enable small and declining ports to maximise their marine potential by the development of diversified infrastructure.
Amendment 1525 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Aquaculture enterprises shall include any enterprise whose core activity involves rearing, cultivation, or primary handling of aquatic organisms grown in an enhanced manner beyond the natural capacity of the environment.
Amendment 1724 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the participation in the Union eco- management and audit schemes established by Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 of the European parliament and of the council of 19 March 2001 allowing voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) or participation in nationally recognised environmental management schemes.
Amendment 1836 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) ensure that local communities fully exploit and benefit from the opportunities offered by maritime and coastal development and in particular help small and declining fishing ports to maximise their marine potential by the development of diversified infrastructure.
Amendment 1858 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 7 7. The respective roles of the FLAG, the managing authority
Amendment 1870 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) enhancing and capitalising on the environmental assets of the fisheries areas including operations to m
Amendment 1893 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 69 – paragraph 1 1. The EMFF
Amendment 1914 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 69 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Expenditure incurred in the preparation and execution of production and marketing plans shall be eligible for 100% direct financial support by the EMFF.
Amendment 1943 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The EMFF may support marketing measures for fishery and aquaculture products, including related processing, which aim at:
Amendment 1972 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new) (iii a) Innovative processes and new product development.
Amendment 1996 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The EMFF may support investments, including capital investments in the processing of fisheries and aquaculture products:
Amendment 2114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 79 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) the participation of Member States' representatives in regional coordination meetings as referred to in Article 37(4) of the [Regulation on the Common Fisheries Policy], meetings of regional fisheries management organisations of which the EU is a contracting partner or an observer or meetings of international bodies in charge of providing scientific, economical or technical advice.
Amendment 2194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 88 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The EMFF shall support operating, technical and scientific costs associated with carrying out studies to underpin the recommendations of the Advisory Councils as set up by Article 52 of [Regulation (EU) No on Common Fisheries Policy]
Amendment 2207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 94 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) 100 % of the eligible public expenditure for the preparation of production and marketing plans referred to in Article 69 and 100 % of the eligible public expenditure for the support under storage aid referred to in Article 70;
source: PE-496.422
|
| 6 |
2011/0434(COD) Conservation of fish stocks: measures in relation to countries allowing non-sustainable fishing
2012/05/03
PECH
6 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In order to ensure that the envisaged measures are not applied in a manner which would constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail, or a disguised restriction on international trade, it is necessary that the adoption of such measures be preceded by an evaluation of their expected environmental, trade, economic and social effects.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ‘stock of common interest’ means a fish stock whose geographical distribution makes it available to the fleets of both Member States and third countries and whose management requires the cooperation between these third countries and the Union, or a fish stock managed under RFMOs to which the Union is a contracting party;
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) has adopted such measures without due regard to the rights, interests and duties of others including the European Union, and those fishery management measures lead to fishing activities which would lead the stock below the levels that can produce maximum sustainable yield, when considered in conjunction with measures taken by the Union either autonomously or in cooperation with other countries, or (c) has failed or refused to adopt the management measures approved within the RFMO that manages the stock.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) impose quantitative restrictions o
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) impose restrictions o
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 4. In adopting measures in accordance to this Regulation, the Commission shall, in order to ensure that the envisaged measures are not applied in a manner which would constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail, or a disguised restriction on international trade, evaluate the environmental, trade, economic and social effects of those measures in the short and long terms and the administrative burden associated to their implementation.
source: PE-483.785
|
| 3 |
2011/2290(INI) Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy - overarching communication
2012/09/05
PECH
3 amendments...
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Believes that
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Considers that
source: PE-489.362
|
| 4 |
2011/2292(INI) Small scale and artisanal fisheries and the CFP reform
2012/08/05
PECH
4 amendments...
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Rejects a definition of small-scale fishing that is restrictive and detached from reality; considers that the definition of small-scale fishing should cover a range of criteria, in addition to the strict boat-size criterion, including, inter alia, the prevailing weather conditions, the impact of fishing techniques on the marine ecosystem, time spent at sea and the characteristics of the economic unit exploiting the resources; (Small vessels operating out of for example the south and west coasts of Ireland have to deal with very adverse weather conditions in the Atlantic Ocean so a strict boat size criteria of 12 metres is not appropriate under these circumstances.)
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Local Management Requests that small offshore islands who are dependant on fishing should be especially recognised and supported both in terms of additional resource allocation and financially in order to ensure these Islands communities can continue to survive and prosper. (Small offshore Islands are finding it extremely difficult to survive as a viable community under the present CFP restrictions and unless they are especially recognised and supported in the reformed CFP they will be unable to continue to exist as Island communities and a way of life that has been practised for hundred of years will cease. The reformed CFP should not allow this to happen.)
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Urges small scale fisheries operators to either join existing Producers Organisations or form new Producer Organisations (A significant number of small scale fisheries operators are not members of any Producer Organisation. In order to maintain and enhance the viability of the sector and to ensure that a better first sale price for its fish and fishery products are obtained it is essential that such operators are members of Producer Organisations either new or existing.)
source: PE-487.773
|
| 11 |
2011/2310(INI) EU cohesion policy strategy for the Atlantic Area
2012/05/24
REGI
11 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 A
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Hopes that the strategy will
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Requests that the valuable lessons learned from the development of existing macro-regional and other transnational strategies be taken fully on board in the Atlantic Strategy process, particularly on issues such as governance, policy development, communication and ownership, targets and evaluation;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Demands that the Strategy and its Action Plan must have a strong emphasis on jobs, growth and investment;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Calls for an external dimension to the Strategy to advance certain objectives and attract international investment to capitalise on the opportunities that exist and suggests that the marketing of the Atlantic Area as a place to invest in, visit and do business must be a key element of the Action Plan;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Suggests that the governance structure to implement the Action Plan must maximise the contribution of the many stakeholders and potential actors in the Atlantic Strategy and demands that a multi-level governance approach be applied to the elaboration, implementation, evaluation and review of the Action Plan;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Proposes that annual implementation reports for the relevant programmes must include an assessment of how programmes are contributing to the objectives of the Atlantic Strategy and the implementation of the Action Plan;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Proposes that the Action Plan, once adopted, will require an information and communication module: to raise visibility, promote understanding of the objectives, attract broader participation (especially from the private sector) and over time the achievements of the Strategy;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Recommends that the Atlantic Strategy must firstly agree on a Strategic Vision for the Atlantic Area, which will provide the reference for the Action Plan 2014-2020; further proposes that this Action Plan must: Establish key priorities, measures and identify flagship projects; Set out clearly defined roles and responsibilities for all policy and implementation stakeholders; Set out key targets and a range of indicators to measure delivery; Agree a process of evaluation and a mid- term review of achievements; Identify the necessary resources to implement the Action Plan.
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 c (new) 26c. Proposes that the Action Plan is adopted by the Atlantic Forum and calls on the forthcoming Irish Presidency to prioritise European Council endorsement of the Action Plan during its Presidency, with a focus on delivery, a credible process for monitoring and on-going evaluation and scheduling a mid-term review;
source: PE-489.598
|
| 4 |
2012/0201(COD) Fishery resources: recovery of the European eel stock; aligning the Regulation with the TFEU (Commission delegated and implementing powers)
2013/04/30
PECH
4 amendments...
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1a (new) Regulation (EC) nº 1100/2007 Article 2 – paragraph 12a (new) (1a) In Article 2, the following paragraph is inserted: "12a. Member States which prohibit fishing for eel, the processing of eel and selling of eel caught in a river basin within their national territory shall provide funding to fishermen and processors to support relevant diversification schemes."
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) Regulation (EC) nº 1100/2007 Article 5 – paragraph 4 (3a) In Article 5, paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: "4. A Member State which has submitted an Eel Management Plan to the Commission for approval not later than 31 December 2008, which cannot be approved by the Commission in accordance with paragraph 1 or which does not adhere to the reporting and evaluation conditions set out in Article 9, shall either reduce fishing effort by at least 50 % relative to the average effort deployed from 2004 to 2006 or reduce fishing effort to ensure a reduction in eel catches by at least 50 % relative to the average catch from 2004 to 2006, either by shortening the fishing season for eel or by other means. This reduction shall be implemented within three months of the decision not to approve the plan or within three months of failure to meet a reporting deadline."
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC) nº 1100/2007 Article 7 – paragraphs 6 and 7 6. In the event of a significant decline of average market prices for eels used for restocking, as compared to those of eels used for other purposes, the Member State concerned shall inform the Commission. The Commission, by means of delegated acts adopted in accordance with Article 12a and in order to address the situation, may temporarily reduce the percentages of eels used for restocking as referred to in paragraph 2 where the Eel Management Plan is in compliance with Article 2(4). 7. The Commission shall, not later than 31 December 2012, report to the European Parliament and the Council and evaluate the measures concerning restocking including the evolution of market pr
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4a (new) Regulation (EC) nº 1100/2007 Article 7 – paragraph 8 (4a) In Article 7, paragraph 8 is replaced by the following: "Restocking shall be deemed to be a conservation measure for the purposes of Article 38(2) of (insert new EMFF Regulation), provided that: - it is part of an Eel Management Plan established in accordance with Article 2, - it concerns eels less than 20 cm in length, and - it contributes to the achievement of the 40 % target level of escapement as referred to in Article 2(4)."
source: PE-510.585
|
| 3 |
2012/0266(COD) Medical devices
2013/05/14
ENVI
3 amendments...
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 a (new) (27a) The qualified person shall require a minimum level of qualification including educational requirements, experience and a professional registered title. One example of this professional registration, particularly for engineers would be the achievement by the qualified person of the national requirements for Eur Ing designation, the EU wide professional registered engineering qualification.
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) a recognised professional title awarded following successful assessment of competence to practice the profession of engineering in the field of medical device or production.
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new) (ba) a recognised professional title awarded following successful assessment of competence to practice the profession of engineering in the field of medical device or production.
source: PE-510.765
|
| 9 |
2012/0366(COD) Tobacco and related products: manufacture, presentation and sale. Approximation of Member States legislation
2013/05/14
ENVI
5 amendments...
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 28 (28) ‘roll-your-own tobacco’ means tobacco which can be used for making cigarettes by consumers
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall prohibit the placing on the market of
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall not prohibit the use of additives which are essential for the manufacture of
Amendment 661 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) cover
Amendment 707 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g source: PE-510.713
2013/05/21
ENVI
4 amendments...
Amendment 724 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point c Amendment 753 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 879 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-510.717
|
| 3 |
2012/2009(DEC) Special report 12/2011 (2011 discharge): Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities?
2012/04/06
PECH
3 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 – point b (b) in the interest of reducing fleet size, it is essential to
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 – point c (c)
source: PE-491.084
|
| 3 |
2012/2309(INI) Composition of the European Parliament with a view to the 2014 elections
2013/01/02
AFCO
3 amendments...
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a Decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament Article 3 –introductory part Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a Decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament Article 3 Pursuant to Article 1, the number of representatives in the European Parliament elected in each Member State is hereby set as follows, with effect from the beginning of the 2014-2019 parliamentary term: Belgium 21 Bulgaria 17 Czech Republic 21 Denmark 13 Germany 96 Estonia 6 Ireland 1
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a Decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament Article 3 a (new) Article 3a The above numbers do not represent a fair and logical redistribution of seats, as required by the Lisbon Treaty.
source: PE-504.228
|
Pat the Cope GALLAGHER on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |