Franck PROUST
Constituencies
-
France
Union pour un Mouvement Populaire
2011/06/23 - 9999/12/31
Groups
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
2011/06/23 - 9999/12/31
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on International Trade | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Industry, Research and Energy | 2012/07/02 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean | 2011/07/06 | 9999/12/31 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries | 2011/07/06 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council | 2011/07/06 | 9999/12/31 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://www.franckproust.com
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45841
- Fax
- +322 28 49841
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 13E154
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75841
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79841
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T08029
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Parlement européen
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 13E154
- B-1047 Bruxelles
Rapporteur
| Responsible | 2013/2062(INI) | CARS 2020: towards a strong, competitive and sustainable European car industry |
| Shadow | 2013/2006(INI) | Reindustrialising Europe to promote competitiveness and sustainability |
| Shadow | 2012/0359(COD) | Exercise of the Union's rights for the application and enforcement of international trade rules |
| Responsible | 2012/0250(COD) | Monitoring EU/third country trade in drug precursors |
| Opinion | 2011/0150(COD) | European standardisation |
Born
1963/05/02 Poitiers- Master's degree in management sciences (1984). Postgraduate diploma (DESS) in marketing (1985). Diploma from the Marketing Study and Research Centre (CEREM) (1985).
- Insurance agent.
- Representative, Gard's sixth constituency - Union pour un Mouvement Populaire.
- Vice-Chairman of the Nîmes Métropole Urban Community Council, with responsibility for economic development. First deputy mayor of Nîmes, with responsibility for higher education and research. Chairman of the Sud Gard Territorial Coherence Plan (SCOT) (since 2008). Member of the Gard Departmental Council (Nîmes V district) (2004-2011).
- Knight of the National Order of Merit.
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 10 |
2010/0323(NLE) EC/Uzbekistan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement: bilateral trade in textiles. Protocol
2011/10/17
INTA
10 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas Uzbekistan inherited and kept largely unreformed a state-run agricultural system, whereas other countries in the same region, such as Kazakhstan and to a lesser extent Tajikistan, are modernising their agriculture and addressing many of the problems; whereas genuine agrarian reform and mechanisation will considerably reduce the incidence of forced child labour and water wastage and will make farms more profitable,
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas, on the basis of the principles and objectives of the Union’s external action, the EU has the moral responsibility to use its leverage
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital U Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 subparagraph (i) (i) Strongly condemn the use of forced and child labour in Uzbekistan;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 subparagraph (iii) (iii) Urge the Government of Uzbekistan to
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 subparagraph (iv) (iv) Contribute through policy dialogue and assistance programmes to market-oriented reforms of Uzbekistan's agricultural sector; offer the EU’s assistance for the transition, ultimately, to a privatised and liberalised farming sector in Uzbekistan, in line with developments in neighbouring countries;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 subparagraph (vi) Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 subparagraph (vii) Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Concludes that it will only consider the consent when the recommendations set out in paragraph 1 are duly addressed by the Commission, the Council and concretely implemented by the Uzbek Government;
source: PE-473.954
|
| 14 |
2010/2301(INI) EU and China: unbalanced trade?
2012/02/02
INTA
14 amendments...
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 – having regard to the Chinese Government’s White Paper of 23 December 2010 on China-Africa economic and trade cooperation,
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas increased development and WTO accession entail, besides substantial benefits, greater responsibility for China to play a full and positive role in the global economic order, in particular in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank Group;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas European businesses struggle to access the Chinese market because of interventionist industrial policies, inadequate protection of intellectual property, a system of rules which is ambiguous in terms of both the substance of the rules and their application, plus other non-tariff and technical barriers to trade;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas in 2010 over 103 million products suspected of infringing intellectual property rights (IPR) of a value totalling 1.11 billion euros were seized at the EU’s external borders and China is the country of origin for 85 % of these goods; whereas production of these goods frequently takes place in facilities that also produce goods for the regular market and in disregard of both labour law and health and safety requirements, and pose a danger to consumers and, in the case of chemicals, to the wider environment;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Is concerned at the unreliability of the judicial system, which fails to enforce contractual obligations, and at the lack of transparency and uniformity in applying the regulatory regime governing investments;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Is concerned at the lack of predictability and publicity in connection with the technical rules and standards applicable to products, particularly in relation to certification, creating significant trade barriers for businesses exporting to China;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Calls on China to adopt international standards for products and services so as to promote trade between China and other countries to a greater extent; welcomes the fact that China is increasing its involvement in international standard- setting bodies and believes that it must be encouraged to do so through reciprocated EU involvement in the bodies which lay down Chinese standard; stresses the importance of compliance by Chinese imports with European standards for food and non-food products;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Is concerned about the problems
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points to the opening up of European public markets to Chinese businesses; is concerned at the possible resulting unfair competition when Chinese businesses can make markedly better offers than European businesses because of, in particular, disguised state aids;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Deplores the inadequate protection of IPR in China and regrets the lack of specific means available to European businesses, and particularly SMEs, to counter IPR infringements effectively; welcomes the Commission’s decision to proposer a review of the directive on the enforcement of IPR; wants China to continue to transpose current international law on the protection of IPR into its national legislation, and more specifically to combat counterfeiting, and urges the Chinese authorities to apply it correctly; regrets that China is not taking part in the negotiations on the next international agreement to combat counterfeiting (ACTA); urges the Commission and the Member States to step up customs cooperation in the EU and with third countries, particularly on the seizure of counterfeit goods, and to simplify customs procedures; is concerned at the scale of production of counterfeit and pirated goods inside China, which remains at an alarmingly high level; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Chinese authorities at national and regional level, to continue its fight against counterfeiting;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on China to increase its efforts to rectify the failure to apply IPRs; stresses the importance of harmonising trade policy and regulation at central and regional level in China and of uniform implementation thereof throughout the country;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Points out that China holds sovereign debt of Member States in the eurozone; stresses that this fact has taken on a new political dimension as a result of the serious debt problems within the eurozone; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Is concerned at the lack of unity in Europe on relations with China; calls on the Commission to rationalise the number of institutions responsible for EU-China relations and calls on the Council to agree on a genuine strategy for relations with China; proposes that an annual report be published on assessing compliance by China with its WTO commitments;
source: PE-480.615
|
| 5 |
2011/0039(COD) Common commercial policy: aligning certain acts with the TFEU (Commission implementing powers)
2011/12/12
INTA
5 amendments...
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex – section 19 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 Article 11 – paragraph 9 9. For proceedings pursuant to Article 10(11), an investigation shall, whenever possible, be concluded within one year. In any event, such investigations shall be concluded within 13 months of initiation, in accordance with the findings made pursuant to Article 13 for undertakings or the findings made pursuant to Article 15 for definitive action.
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex 1 – section 19 – point 3 – point a Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The provisional duties shall be imposed no earlier than 60 days and no later than 9 months from the initiation of the proceedings.
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex – section 19 – point 10 – point a Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Reviews carried out pursuant to Articles 18 and 19 shall be carried out expeditiously and shall normally be concluded within 12 months of the date of initiation of the review. In any event, reviews pursuant to Articles 18 and 19 shall be concluded within 15 months of initiation.
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex – section 24 – point 3 Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 Article 6 – paragraph 9 For proceedings initiated pursuant to Article 5(9), an investigation shall, whenever possible, be concluded within one year. In any event, such investigations shall be concluded within 15 months of initiation, in accordance with the findings made pursuant to Article 8 for undertakings or the findings made pursuant to Article 9 for definitive action.
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex – section 24 – point 4 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 Article 7 – paragraph 1 Provisional duties may be imposed if proceedings have been initiated in accordance with Article 5, if a notice has been given to that effect and interested parties have been given an adequate opportunity to submit information and make comments in accordance with Article 5(10), if a provisional affirmative determination has been made of dumping and consequent injury to the Union industry, and if the Union interest calls for intervention to prevent such injury. The provisional duties shall be imposed no earlier than 60 days and no later than 9 months from the initiation of the proceedings.
source: PE-478.430
|
| 1 |
2011/0117(COD) Scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP)
2012/01/23
INTA
1 amendments...
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a a) it has been classified by the World Bank as a high-income or an upper-middle income country, or it has accounted for a share of world merchandise exports above 1%, during three consecutive years immediately preceding the update of the list of beneficiary countries;
source: PE-480.597
|
| 1 |
2011/0150(COD) European standardisation
2012/01/16
INTA
1 amendments...
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 – point 3 – point f a (new) (fa) coherence: the technical specifications do not contradict existing national, European and international standards or those in the process of being drafted, nor do they duplicate them.
source: PE-478.665
|
| 3 |
2011/0177(APP) Multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020
2012/05/09
ITRE
3 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
1. Believes that to get the EU out of the current economic and social crisis, and to guarantee its future competitiveness in a globalised world, it is absolutely essential that the objectives set out in the EU 2020 strategy to achieve a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth are met; points out that, to do this, the EU has the ambition ultimately to become the world’s leading science and technology destination in terms both of growth and of employment; underlines that to implement these objectives, an estimated total of EUR 1600 billion of future-
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the key role that the EU budget must play in achieving the commonly agreed EU 2020 strategy objectives since, if well devised, EU funding can actually trigger and catalyse actions of clear EU added value that Member States are unable to carry out on their own, as well as create synergies and complementarities with Member States’ activities
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the added value of EU programmes in favour of SMEs, as these have proven very helpful in supporting Member States’ efforts to secure SMEs’ access to funding opportunities in a time of deep financial crisis; stresses, nevertheless, that a better
source: PE-494.802
|
| 3 |
2011/0262(COD) EU/Colombia/Peru Trade Agreement: implementation of the bilateral safeguard clause and the stabilisation mechanism for bananas
2012/04/17
INTA
3 amendments...
Amendment 25 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(2) and Article 349 thereof,
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) The Commission should undertake to use the Stabilisation Mechanism for Bananas diligently and effectively to avoid damaging EU producers and, after January 2020, to maintain, if necessary, a mechanism enabling – in case of serious market disturbances – Union production pathways to be protected, especially those in the outermost regions.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Two years before the end of the period of application referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall carry out an impact study concerning the application of the Stabilisation Mechanism, which it shall forward to the European Parliament and the Council, and shall consider the possibility of extending the application of the provisions of this article.
source: PE-487.743
|
| 3 |
2011/0263(COD) EU/Central America Association Agreement: implementation of the bilateral safeguard clause and the stabilisation mechanism for bananas
2012/04/16
INTA
3 amendments...
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(2) and Article 349 thereof,
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) The Commission undertakes to make diligent and effective use of the Stabilisation Mechanism for Bananas in order to avoid any damage to producers in the Union and, after January 2020, to maintain – if necessary – a system which, in the event of serious market disruption, will make it possible to preserve production sectors in the Union and particularly in the outermost regions.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Two years before the end of the application period referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall assess the impact of the application of the Stabilisation Mechanism, forward its assessment to the European Parliament and the Council, and consider the possibility of extending the application of the provisions of this article.
source: PE-487.732
|
| 5 |
2011/0302(COD) Connecting Europe Facility
2012/10/10
TRAN, ITRE
5 amendments...
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The Connecting Europe Facility reflects the priority industrial sectors for Europe. It will become an essential instrument for establishing a European industrial policy which is a source of sustainable growth.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 a (new) (48a) The participation of undertakings established in third countries is a prerequisite for achieving the objectives of the Connecting Europe Facility, in view of the experience and technical know-how which they can bring to the projects. Particular attention must, however, be drawn to the need for such undertakings to comply with labour, social and environmental law. This is a growing demand from European society. The Commission should therefore be given the means to carry out this task, with a view to promoting fair competition between European undertakings and third countries.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 b (new) (48b) Participation in Union-financed projects by undertakings established in third countries must be matched by a requirement for reciprocity in trade relations. Therefore European undertakings must have access to similar opportunities in the third countries concerned.
Amendment 516 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) in the event of an irregularity committed in the implementation of the action
Amendment 571 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 Only actions in
source: PE-496.337
|
| 4 |
2011/0359(COD) Statutory audit of public-interest entities: specific requirements
2012/10/19
ITRE
4 amendments...
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 Where throughout a continuous engagement of 6 years at least two statutory auditors or audit firms have been appointed, the maximum duration of the engagement of each statutory auditor or audit firm shall not exceed 9 years.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 3 3. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, on an exceptional basis the public- interest entity may request the competent authority referred to in Article 35(1) to grant an extension to re-appoint the statutory auditor or audit firm for an additional engagement. In
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Before X X 20XX [six years after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall submit an evaluation report, based on the ESMA reports and other relevant information, on all the tasks entrusted to ESMA by virtue of this Article.
source: PE-498.010
|
| 3 |
2011/0430(COD) Reuse of public sector information
2012/01/10
ITRE
3 amendments...
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point 1 Directive 2003/98/EC Article 6 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 6 – point 1 Directive 2003/98/EC Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2, libraries (including university libraries), museums and archives may charge over and above the marginal costs for the re-use of documents they hold.’ These charges shall be fixed on the basis of objective, transparent and verifiable criteria, subject to the approval of the authority referred to in Article 4(4). The authority shall take the flexibility of these establishments into account when establishing their tariff structure.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 9 a (new) Directive 2003/98/EC Article 11 – paragraph 2 9a. In Article 11 (Prohibition of exclusive arrangements), the following sentence is added at the end of paragraph 2: "Nevertheless, where the exclusive right relates specifically to the digitisation of data and information of a cultural nature, it shall be reviewed at intervals of no more than ten years."
source: PE-496.525
|
| 7 |
2011/0438(COD) Public procurement
2012/08/29
INTA
7 amendments...
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Public procurement plays a key role in the Europe 2020 strategy as one of the market-based instruments to be used to achieve a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth while ensuring the most efficient use of public funds. Public procurement is a vital tool in the redefinition of European industrial policy. For that purpose, the current public procurement rules adopted pursuant to Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts have to be revised and modernised in order to increase the efficiency of public spending, facilitating in particular the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises in public procurement and to enable procurers to make better use of public procurement in support of common societal goals. There is also a need to clarify basic notions and concepts to ensure better legal certainty and to incorporate certain aspects of related well-established case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 a (new) (8a) When the European Commission negotiates trade agreements with countries that are not members of the Agreement, it should include the criteria that are in addition to price in the chapter on public procurement. Contracting authorities should be able, with the Commission’s agreement, to exclude economic operators from third countries which do not open up their public procurement markets to EU businesses. This would give the Commission some scope for manoeuvre in its negotiations with third countries.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 69 – paragraph 2 Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 69 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new) (ea) tenderers which intend to call upon a subcontractor affected by d) and e).
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 69 a (new) Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 69 b (new) Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 71 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The subcontractor, irrespective of its country of origin, is required to comply with labour, social and environmental standards and shall not benefit from any State aid that might result in the price of the tender price being so low that it is detrimental to fair competition.
source: PE-494.673
|
| 1 |
2011/0439(COD) Procurement in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors
2012/08/29
INTA
1 amendments...
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Public procurement plays a key role in the Europe 2020 strategy as one of the market-based instruments to be used to achieve a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth while ensuring the most efficient use of public funds. Public procurement is a key tool in the process of reframing European industrial policy. For that purpose, the current public procurement rules adopted pursuant to Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts have to be revised and modernised in order to increase the efficiency of public spending, facilitating in particular the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises in public procurement and to enable procurers to make better use of public procurement in support of common societal goals. There is also a need to clarify basic notions and concepts to ensure better legal certainty and to incorporate certain aspects of related well-established case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
source: PE-494.675
|
| 3 |
2011/2048(INI) Modernisation of public procurement
2011/07/20
INTA
3 amendments...
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. calls for the States Parties to the Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) to conclude the reform of that agreement as rapidly as possible to encourage greater fairness and transparency at international level by combating corruption more effectively while respecting the multi-functional nature of procurement policies; calls on those States to keep their reservations – be they territorial or sector-specific – within reasonable bounds when ratifying the future agreement; calls on non-member countries, especially those with which the EU does not have, or is not negotiating, a free trade agreement, to participate in the current revision process and afterwards to ratify the future agreement;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. stresses that in a context of increased international competition, European undertakings stand out through their capacity for innovation, the high technology they develop and the quality of the social and environmental standards they apply; calls for the Commission to encourage the recognition within the GPA of criteria in addition to price in the award of public procurement contracts; calls on the Commission to apply additional criteria of that kind when negotiating free trade agreements with non-GPA countries, taking into account the level of development of the other parties concerned when selecting and defining those criteria; considers that better rules on public procurement would make for the creation of more high-
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. considers that the European market cannot, on a unilateral basis, be open to third-country operators and calls for the Commission to establish an effective
source: PE-469.864
|
| 1 |
2011/2096(INI) Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system
2011/09/21
REGI
1 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that transport networks play a leading role in spatial planning policies; notes that major transport infrastructure such as high-speed railways helps make regions less isolated while also boosting local development networks; highlights the importance of implementing specific regional projects linked to the construction of major infrastructure, involving as many partners as possible (local, regional and national authorities, private operators, civil society, etc.);
source: PE-472.262
|
| 2 |
2011/2288(INI) Attractiveness of investing in Europe
2012/03/29
REGI
2 amendments...
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2a (new) 2a. Stresses the key role played by geographically targeted support in the success of a territorial development strategy; thus considers it essential that all kinds of businesses benefit from such support; recalls, however, that cohesion policy mainly targets SMEs as an asset in harmonious regional planning and diversification of the local economy;
source: PE-486.150
|
| 5 |
2011/2306(INI) Trade aspects of the Eastern partnership
2012/03/29
INTA
5 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Belarus has so far participated only in a limited way in the different platforms of the Eastern Partnership; whereas
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Underlines that a DCFTA is not assistance given to the Eastern Partners, it is a trade deal bringing about reciprocal advantages and obligations for both parties; stresses that DCFTAs would not only bring economic benefits for the Eastern Partners but can also accelerate institutional reforms, modernisation and development;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35.
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 68 68. Expresses its hope that Ukraine will find enough political will and courage to create political and regulatory conditions for full and timely implementation of the DCFTA, which would be of great benefit to its population;
source: PE-486.022
|
| 6 |
2012/0011(COD) Personal data protection: processing and free movement of data (General Data Protection Regulation)
2012/12/20
ITRE
2 amendments...
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (ea) that has been rendered anonymous;
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 13 (13) ‘main establishment’ means as regards the controller, the place, by activity sector, of its establishment in the Union where the main decisions as to the purposes, conditions and means of the processing of personal data are taken; if no decisions as to the purposes, conditions and means of the processing of personal data are taken in the Union, the main establishment is the place where the main processing activities in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller in the Union take place. As regards the processor, 'main establishment' means the place of its central administration in the Union;
source: PE-502.053
2012/12/21
ITRE
3 amendments...
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 If the data processed by a controller
Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where the controller and the processor are established in several Member States for the purposes of the full or partial management of data, they shall be given the opportunity to designate their main establishment.
Amendment 915 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 89 – paragraph 2 2. Article 1(2), Article 2(b) and (c), Article 4(3),(4) and (5), and Articles 6 and 9 of Directive 2002/58/EC shall be deleted.
source: PE-502.055
2013/09/01
ITRE
1 amendments...
Amendment 915 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 89 – paragraph 2 2. Article 1(2), Article 2(b) and (c), Article 4(3),(4) and (5), and Articles 6 and 9 of Directive 2002/58/EC shall be deleted.
source: PE-502.174
|
| 21 |
2012/0250(COD) Monitoring EU/third country trade in drug precursors
2013/02/01
INTA, INTA
21 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Trade in medicinal products is not controlled, since they are currently excluded from the definition of scheduled substances.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Medicinal products
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7)
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In order to achieve the objectives of Regulation (EC) No 111/2005, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in order to lay down provisions determining cases where a licence is not required and to set out further conditions for granting licences, to establish the conditions for exemptions from the controls of certain categories of operators and of operators engaged in the export of small quantities of scheduled substances listed in Category 3, to establish the criteria to determine how the licit purposes of the transaction may be demonstrated, to determine the information that is required by the competent authorities to monitor export, import or intermediary activities of operators, to determine the countries of destination to which exports of scheduled substances of Category 2 and 3 of the Annex should be preceded by a pre-export notification, to determine simplified pre-export procedures and to establish the common criteria thereof, to determine the countries of destination to which exports of scheduled substances listed in Category 3 of the Annex should be subject to an export authorisation, to determine simplified export authorisation procedures and to establish the common criteria thereof, and to introduce additional substances into the Annex to this Regulation,
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Delegated acts determining the cases in which a licence is not required and setting other conditions for the granting of licences, and implementing acts establishing a model for licences, should guarantee a systematic and consistent control and monitoring of operators.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Since this Regulation is based on the common commercial policy, the
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point -1 (new) Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Title -1) The title is amended to read: Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 of 22 December 2004 laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Union and third countries in drug precursors (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 a Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 2 – point a a)
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 b Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall establish a model for licences by means of implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 b Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 6 – paragraph 4 Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 6 a Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 11 – paragraph 1 – first subparagraph 1. All exports of scheduled substances listed in Categor
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 6 b Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. Simplified pre-export notification procedures may be applied by the competent authorities where they are satisfied that this will not result in any risk of diversion of scheduled substances
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 7 Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 However, exports of scheduled substances listed in Category 3 of the Annex shall only be subject to an export authorisation where pre-export notifications are required
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 9 a Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 26 – paragraph 1 Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 10 Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 28 In addition to the measures referred to in Article 26, the Commission shall be empowered to lay down, where necessary, by means of implementing acts, measures to ensure the effective monitoring of trade between the Union and third countries in drug precursors for the purpose of preventing the diversion of such substances, in particular with regard to the design and use of export and import authorisation forms. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the
Amendment 16 #
Article 1 – point 12 Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 30 – paragraph 2 2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 30 a The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 30b for the inclusion of additional substances in the Annex to this regulation, in order to adapt the Annex to new trends in diversion of drug precursors, in particular substances which can be easily transformed into scheduled substances, and to follow an amendment to the tables in the Annex to the United Nations Convention.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 30 b – paragraph 2 2. The
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 30 b – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 13 Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Article 30 b – paragraph 5 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 6(
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 16 a (new) Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 Annex – Category 4 (new) source: PE-504.126
|
| 1 |
2012/2097(INI) Corporate Social Responsibility: promoting society's interests and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery
2012/11/20
INTA
1 amendments...
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that future bilateral investment treaties signed by the EU must guarantee a fair balance between investors’ protection and the potential for State intervention, especially as regards social, health and environmental standards;
source: PE-500.487
|
| 1 |
2012/2098(INI) Corporate Social Responsibility: accountable, transparent and responsible business behaviour and sustainable growth
2012/11/26
INTA
1 amendments...
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that future bilateral investment treaties signed by the EU must guarantee a fair balance between investors’ protection and the potential for State intervention, especially as regards social, health and environmental standards;
source: PE-500.554
|
| 3 |
2013/0063(COD) Trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products
2013/05/29
INTA
3 amendments...
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, determine the processed agricultural products listed in Annex IV to which, when imported subject to the rate of duty laid down in the Common Customs Tariff, an additional import duty or an import restriction based on environmental or health standards shall apply in order to prevent or counteract adverse effects on all or part of the Union market which may result from those imports, if:
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) the products do not meet the environmental or health standards imposed on Union producers;
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. Additional import duties shall not be imposed in accordance with paragraph 1 where the imports are unlikely to disturb all or part of the Union market, or where the effects would be disproportionate to the intended objective.
source: PE-513.043
|
| 8 |
2013/2006(INI) Reindustrialising Europe to promote competitiveness and sustainability
2013/05/15
INTA
8 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the importance of research and innovation as a means of ensuring the competitiveness of European companies in world markets; urges the Union and Member States to increase the funds allocated to research and development; calls on the Commission to encourage the emergence of industrial sectors which are based on new technologies, generate products with a high added value and are sparing in their use of energy resources; stresses the need for our companies to anticipate the needs of third-country markets more effectively and thereby meet global demand;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of a clear and stable legal framework to encourage investment in industry; urges the Commission and the Member States to encourage the development and internationalisation of Europe’s SMEs, which will play a major role in tomorrow's industrial policy, by facilitating their access to funding; calls for the establishment of a ‘one-stop shop’ to advise SMEs on issues concerning both domestic and foreign markets with a view to helping them access sources of information and funding;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Encourages the Commission to ensure European companies have access to international markets
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls that public procurement forms an integral part of industrial policy among most of our trading partners; is concerned about the protectionist revival plans mobilising the public procurement market adopted by many of our trading partners; believes therefore that a reciprocity instrument promoting the opening of third markets is an essential tool for the re-industrialisation of the Union and welcomes the Commission’s proposal in this connection;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Recalls that the strength of European enterprises lies primarily in innovation; emphasises the importance of protecting the industrial property rights of European enterprises;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Notes the modernisation of Trade Defence Instruments proposed by the Commission; believes that effective Trade Defence Instruments are likely to discourage certain unfair practices; calls therefore on the Commission not to weaken them de jure or de facto;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Welcomes the proposal for a regulation seeking to exercise the Union’s rights as regards the implementation and enforcement of respect for the rules of international trade; considers that better responsiveness as regards the enforcement of our rights is likely to restore our credibility and rebalance our trade relations;
source: PE-510.693
|
Franck PROUST on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| RSS | deleted |
|
|