Dolores GARCÍA-HIERRO CARABALLO
Constituencies
-
Spain
Partido Socialista Obrero Español
2011/12/01 - 9999/12/31
Groups
-
S&D
Member
Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament
2011/12/01 - 9999/12/31
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Fisheries | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Petitions | 2013/04/10 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Japan | 2012/02/13 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with South Africa | 2011/12/14 | 2012/02/12 |
Contact
Online
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45251
- Fax
- +322 28 49251
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 11G210
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75251
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79251
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T05053
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Parlamento Europeo
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 11G210
- B-1047 Bruselas
Born
1958/05/16 Urda (Toledo)- Member of the Congress of Deputies (1996-2007).
- Spokesperson for the Socialist Parliamentary Group in the Madrid Assembly (1993-1996).
- President of the Villaverde (Madrid) District Council (1987-1989).
- Conference coordinator/organiser at universities including the University of Jaen, Complutense University of Madrid and the Polytechnic University of Valencia.
- Economic, human and institutional resources manager.
- Expert in fields including climate change, energy, security, cooperation, migration, labour resources, economics, rail transport and legal systems.
- Non-formal educator.
- Founder of a first progressive women's association.
- Member of the General Workers' Union (UGT) since 1975.
- Co-worker in various NGOs and social movements.
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 83 |
2011/0194(COD) Common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products
2012/04/13
PECH
83 amendments...
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 The Common Market Organisation shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives laid down in
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 The Common Market Organisation shall be guided by the principles of good governance
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) fa) ‘operator’, means the natural or legal person who operates or holds any enterprise carrying out any of the activities related to any stage of production, processing, marketing, distribution and sale of fisheries and aquaculture products;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new) fb) ‘unwanted catches’
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) For the purposes of setting up fishery producer organisations, the specific situation of small-scale inshore fishery and non-industrial fishery producers will need to be taken into account, and they should benefit from positive discrimination as regards access to aid for the establishment of producer organisations.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) aa) contributing to food supply and employment in coastal and rural areas;
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b b) handling unwanted catches of commercial stocks in accordance with the production and marketing plans laid down in Article 32;
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) ba) contributing to the elimination of illegal, unregistered and undeclared (IUU) fishing;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) ea) promoting vocational training and cooperation programmes in the field of fisheries;
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new) eb) facilitating consumer access to information on fisheries products, which should be clear and comprehensive.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Fishery producer organisations may make use, inter alia, of the following measures to achieve the objectives set out in Article 7:
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a a) planning the management of the fishing activities of their members;
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) aa) advise the Member States and regional authorities on matters relating to fisheries management;
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3 – distributing landed products
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) fa) improving quality, knowledge of and the transparency of production and the market, performing research studies and promoting Union fishery products;
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new) fb) supporting vocational training and cooperation programmes in the field of fisheries;
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f c (new) fc) promoting consumer access to information on fisheries products, which should be clear and comprehensive;
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f d (new) fd) sending information voluntarily to the competent national authorities on the conservation status of marine ecosystems and fishery resources at such intervals and by such means as might be considered appropriate;
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f e (new) fe) granting floor-rate financial compensation to help meet the costs of landing unwanted catches in cases where the proceeds of sales would be insufficient to cover those costs;
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f f (new) ff) granting floor-rate financial compensation to help meet the costs of biological rest periods, at given critical phases of species’ life cycles, in order to conserve fishery resources and hence ensure that stocks will be such as to allow fishing to continue outside rest periods.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) Revenue from the marketing of unwanted catches must, for the most part, be assigned to national authorities, which shall use it to obtain and process biological data to help improve knowledge of the state of fishery resources; producers may be compensated for the costs incurred in the handling, storage, and landing of those catches and shall be granted a floor-rate percentage of their market value.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a a) promoting economically, socially and environmentally sustainable aquaculture activities of their members, by providing opportunities for their development in close cooperation with the Member States and regional authorities;
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b b) contributing to food supply
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) da) stabilising the markets;
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new) eb) promoting vocational training and cooperation programmes in the field of aquaculture;
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new) ec) facilitating consumer access to information on aquaculture products;
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Aquaculture producer organisations may make use, inter alia, of the following measures to achieve the objectives referred to in Article 10:
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) aa) planning the management of the aquaculture activities of their members;
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c c) channelling the supply, price stabilisation and the marketing of members' products;
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) ca) managing temporary storage for aquaculture products in conformity with Articles 35 and 36.
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) ea) ) improving quality, knowledge of and the transparency of production and the market, performing research studies and promoting Union aquaculture products;
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new) eb) supporting vocational training and cooperation programmes in the field of aquaculture;
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new) ec) promoting consumer access to information on aquaculture products, which should be clear and comprehensive;
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 a (new) Article 11a Operators’ Organisations Establishment of operators’ organisations Operators’ organisations may be established as groups set up on the own initiative of marketing bodies and processors of fishery and aquaculture products in one or more Member States.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 b (new) Article 11b Objectives of Operators’ Organisations Operators’ organisations shall pursue the following objectives: a) improving the conditions for the placing on the market of fishery and aquaculture products; b) stabilising markets.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 c (new) Article 11c Measures deployable by operators’ organisations a) adjusting production to market requirements; b) channelling the supply and the marketing of their members’ products; c) controlling and taking measures to ensure their members' activities comply with the rules established by the operators’ organisation.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) ga) providing training on quality and traceability.
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 a (new) Article 16a Management bodies for protected designations of origin Management bodies for protected designations of origin, established under the regulations in each Member State, may bring their objectives, measures, powers and the rights that are naturally theirs into line with those granted to professional organisations governed by this Regulation.
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a a) they are sufficiently active economically in their territory or a part thereof, in particular as regards number of members
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 Member States shall carry out checks at regular intervals to ascertain whether producer organisations, associations of producer organisations and inter-branch organisations comply with the conditions for recognition laid down in Articles 17 and 18 and shall, where appropriate, withdraw recognition of producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or inter-branch organisations.
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 Member States whose nationals are members of a producer organisation, association of producer organisations or inter-branch organisation established in the territory of another Member State and those Member States hosting the official headquarters of an association of producer organisations recognised in different Member States shall set up, in collaboration with the relevant Member States, the administrative cooperation needed to carry out checks on the activities of the organisation or the association concerned.
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – title Communication to the Commission and publication of the list of producer organisations
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 In order to ensure that the conditions for recognition of producer organisations, operator organisations, associations of producer organisations or inter-branch organisations laid down in Articles 17 and 18 are complied with, the Commission may carry out checks and may, where appropriate, request that Member States withdraw the recognition of producer organisations
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – title Extension of rules of producer organisations and associations of producer organisations
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. A Member State may make the rules agreed within a producer organisation or association of producer organisations binding on producers who are not members of the organisation or association and who market any of the products within the area in which the producer organisation or association of producer organisations is representative on condition that:
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a a) the producer organisation or association of producer organisations is considered to be representative of production and marketing in one Member State and makes an application to the competent national authorities;
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b b) the rules to be extended concern any of the measures for producer organisations or associations of producer organisations laid down in Article 8(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and Article 11.
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1(a) a fishery producer organisation or association of producer organisations is deemed representative where it accounts for at least 65 % of the quantities marketed of the relevant product during the previous year in the area where it is proposed to extend the rules.
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 3. For the purposes of paragraph 1(a) an aquaculture producer organisation or association of producer organisations is considered to be representative where it covers at least
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 4 4. The rules to be extended to non- members shall apply for a period
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall notify the Commission of the rules which they
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 3 3. Within
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 1. Each producer organisation shall submit a production and marketing plan to their competent national authorities to fulfil the objectives laid down in Article 3. Plans may take biological rest periods into account.
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 2 2. The Member States shall approve the plan and inform the Commission thereof. Once approved, the producer organisation shall immediately implement the plan.
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Producer organisations may fully or partly finance the storage of fishery products listed in Annex II to this Regulation, along with other products to be determined by the Member States, provided that:
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) da) the minimum and maximum period shall be clearly laid down.
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new) Aquaculture producer organisations may temporarily finance the holding of live stock in aquaculture facilities, provided that: a) at the time the fish stock is slaughtered no buyer has been found for them at the trigger price referred to in Article 36; b) the products meet the marketing standards adopted under Article 39 and are of suitable quality for human consumption; c) the live aquaculture stock is being held in order to reintroduce it onto the market for human consumption at a later stage.
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 1. Before the beginning of each year, each producer organisation may individually make a proposal for a price triggering the storage mechanism referred to in Article 35 for fishery products listed in Annex II, as well as for aquaculture products.
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph -1 -1. The creation, restructuring and implementation of plans to improve the standards of producer organisations and their associations may be fully or partly funded through the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund.
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Each producer organisation may create a collective fund, which shall be used
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) The instruments that make up the CMO, including the Fisheries Fund, shall be funded through the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, without prejudice to the co-financing rates set.
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a a) minimum marketing sizes taking into account the best available scientific advice and in conformity with conservation reference sizes for fishery products as referred to in Article 15(
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) aa) the minimum degree of freshness of unprocessed fish;
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) ba) specifications applicable to products from unwanted catches, below the minimum size or over the set quota.
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In order to improve first sale prices for fish, so as to benefit producers, and to make for fair and proper distribution of added value over the whole of the value chain, whenever serious problems are noted in terms of producers’ incomes and imbalances along the value chain.
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 3. All fishery products landed, including those not complying with marketing standards, may be, under the responsibility of the Member States, distributed
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 50, in order to
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point c c) the area where the product was caught or farmed
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point e e) whether the product is fr
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new) ca) Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs.
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 a (new) Article 42a Labelling initiative Following prior consultation with the interested parties, the Commission shall, by 1 July 2014, submit a report to the European Parliament , together with the appropriate legislative proposals, on the establishment of a labelling system for fishery and aquaculture products, which shall comprise: a) an ecological labelling system for sustainable fishing within maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and for traditional aquaculture products. b) a Union label for all fishery and aquaculture products obtained by means of practices which comply with relevant Union rules.
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point a a) the scientific name for each species according to the FishBase Information System, for fish species, and the SeaLifeBase or WoRMS systems for other species;
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a a) in the case of fishery products caught at sea, the name of one of the areas, subareas or divisions listed in the FAO Fishing Areas, including its coastal and geographical denomination, expressed in terms understandable to consumers;
Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 2 2. In addition to the information referred to in paragraph 1, operators may indicate a more precise catch or production area, without prejudice to Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) ea) information on the port at which the product was landed.
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. No voluntary information shall be included that cannot be checked.
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point a a) supplement or
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point b b) s
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point b b) survey prices regularly along the Union supply chain for fishery and aquaculture products and conduct analyses on market trends, and make the findings of those surveys and analyses public;
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – New entries to be inserted/added fishmeal, tuna intended for processing, aquaculture species listed in Annex V of Regulation 104/2000, the species Sprattus sprattus and Coryphaena hippurus, listed in Annex IV of Regulation 104/2000
source: PE-487.716
|
| 156 |
2011/0195(COD) Common Fisheries Policy
2012/06/25
PECH
156 amendments...
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) Fisheries management based on the best available scientific advice requires harmonised, reliable and accurate data sets. Therefore Member
Amendment 541 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 a (new) (51a) Union financial assistance should facilitate the development of public goods and services in the fisheries sector, and in particular support control and monitoring measures, information gathering, research and the development of activities aimed at ensuring a healthy marine ecosystem.
Amendment 575 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) conservation, management and exploitation of marine biological resources
Amendment 581 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 596 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) in Union waters, including by fishing vessels flying the flag of, and registered in, third countries, in accordance with the provisions of international fisheries agreements; or
Amendment 597 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) by Union fishing vessels outside Union waters, in accordance with the rules of the waters in which they operate; or
Amendment 602 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The Common Fisheries Policy shall ensure that fishing and aquaculture activities provide long-term sustainable
Amendment 617 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 2 2. The Common Fisheries Policy shall apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and if the socio- economic sustainability of the sector permits, shall aim to ensure, by 2015 wherever possible, that exploitation of living marine biological resources restores and maintains populations of harvested species a
Amendment 640 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 3 3. The Common Fisheries Policy shall implement
Amendment 682 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 703 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) provide conditions for efficient fishing activities within an economically viable and competitive fishing industry, in order to achieve a single market for seafood, recognising the importance of coastal and artisanal fishing and shellfishing as generators of wealth and a model for sustainable exploitation;
Amendment 733 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d (d)
Amendment 785 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) clear definition of the responsibilities a
Amendment 793 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) establishment of measures in accordance with the best available scientific advice, and the corresponding socio-economic impact studies, taking into account the need to make the relevant adjustments gradually;
Amendment 813 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 816 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) consistence with the
Amendment 842 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 6 ‘maximum sustainable yield’ means the
Amendment 860 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 7 ‘precautionary approach to fisheries management’ means
Amendment 867 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 8 ‘ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management’ means
Amendment 878 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 9 ‘fishing mortality rate’ means the
Amendment 881 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 10 ‘stock’ means a marine biological resource
Amendment 890 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 12 ‘conservation reference point’ means
Amendment 900 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 13 ‘safeguard’ means a precautionary measure designed to protect
Amendment 905 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 14 ‘technical measures’ means the measures that regulate the species composition, size composition of catches and impacts on components of the ecosystems resulting from fishing activities
Amendment 925 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 17 – 'transferable fishing concessions' means revocable user entitlements to a specific part of fishing opportunities allocated to a Member State
Amendment 937 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 19 –
Amendment 946 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 20 – 'aquaculture' means the
Amendment 950 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 21 – 'fishing licence' means a
Amendment 952 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 22 – 'fishing authorisation' means an authorisation
Amendment 954 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 23 – 'fishing
Amendment 962 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 27 – 'end-user of scientific data' means a body with a research
Amendment 967 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 28 – 'surplus of allowable catch' means that part of the allowable catch which a coastal State does not have the capacity to
Amendment 972 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 30 – 'spawning stock biomass' means an estimate of the mass of the fish of a particular resource that reproduces at a defined time
Amendment 977 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 31 – '
Amendment 981 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 31 a (new) – 'coastal and small-scale fishing' means professional fishing activity deeply rooted in a local community and carried out in maritime areas near to the coast, which is highly-selective, conducted during short fishing trips, with daily returns to port, and characterised by the freshness of its products and its respect for the environment and the small-scale tradition. This type of fishing shows a high level of socioeconomic dependence on ports and is operated by a microbusiness or family business, both in terms of ownership and actual fishing. This definition includes shellfish gathering and the fishing of certain species on foot;
Amendment 1048 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) adopting multiannual plans
Amendment 1051 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 1082 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) fixing fishing opportunities as defined in Article 16;
Amendment 1085 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 1102 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) Measures adopted shall be based on scientific and socioeconomic reports drawn up for this purpose by STECF (the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries).
Amendment 1124 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 1140 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) requirements for fishing vessels to cease operating in an area for a defined minimum period in order to protect a temporary aggregation of a vulnerable marine resource, endangered or spawning species or juveniles;
Amendment 1160 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Multiannual plans providing for technical conservation measures to maintain or restore fish stocks
Amendment 1172 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a (new) (a) mesh sizes and rules concerning the use of fishing gears;
Amendment 1173 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (new) (b) restrictions on the construction of fishing gear, including (i) modifications or additional devices to improve selectivity or to reduce impact on the benthic zone; (ii) modifications or additional devices to reduce the incidental capture of endangered, threatened and protected species;
Amendment 1174 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c (new) (c) prohibition of the use of certain fishing gears in certain areas or seasons;
Amendment 1175 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d (new) (d) prohibition or restriction of fishing activities in certain zones and/or periods;
Amendment 1176 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point e (new) (e) requirements for fishing vessels to cease operating in an area for a defined minimum period in order to protect a temporary aggregation of a vulnerable marine resource, endangered or spawning species or juveniles;
Amendment 1177 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point f (new) (f) specific measures to reduce the impact of fishing activities on marine eco-systems and non target species;
Amendment 1178 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g (new) (g) other technical measures aimed at protecting marine biodiversity.
Amendment 1204 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Any measures adopted must be based on scientific and socioeconomic reports drawn up for that purpose by the STECF (Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries).
Amendment 1205 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 3 3. Multiannual plans shall
Amendment 1212 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 4. Multiannual plans shall be based on the precautionary approach to fisheries management and shall take into account the limitations of the available data and assessment methods
Amendment 1222 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The application and design of multiannual plans shall include the proposal of measures based on economic wisdom, taking into account the need to gradually introduce relevant changes and avoiding the imposition of unnecessarily short time frames in non-urgent situations, which should be based on objective reasoning and also be acceptable in socioeconomic terms. At the same time, a socioeconomic impact study shall be carried out, with the participation of the actors concerned.
Amendment 1232 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Multiannual plans should set clear objectives, time frames for reaching them, trajectories and periodic checks. Both the time frame and the trajectory should be tailored to the dynamics of the species involved. A two-speed trajectory may be used, involving swifter action to restore the stock to within biological limits and a slower lane from which to address socioeconomic objectives once the risk to recruitment owing to lack of breeding stock has been averted.
Amendment 1238 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. The Regional Advisory Councils (RACs) shall advise Parliament and the Council on the adoption of multiannual plans.
Amendment 1245 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 10 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 1268 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 10 – paragraph 2 2. In cases where the determination of a fishing mortality rate that restores and maintains stocks a
Amendment 1303 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) clear time frames to reach the quantifiable targets; including a socioeconomic impact assessment of the various alternatives and time frames presented in such plans and possible short-term losses for the actors involved, in both the fishing and processing industries;
Amendment 1309 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) Any measures adopted must be based on scientific and socioeconomic reports drawn up for that purpose by the STECF (Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries).
Amendment 1315 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) technical measures including measures concerning the
Amendment 1335 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) quantifiable indicators for periodic monitoring and assessment of the progress related to achieving the targets of the multiannual plan and its possible socio- economic consequences;
Amendment 1346 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) minimisation of unwanted impacts of fishing on the eco-system;
Amendment 1351 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point i Amendment 1366 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) any other
Amendment 1370 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new) (ja) measures to mitigate the social and economic consequences within its scope of application.
Amendment 1394 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 12 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts
Amendment 1400 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 13 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1415 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 13 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1427 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 14 – title Technical measures frameworks provided for in multiannual plans
Amendment 1428 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 1438 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to maintaining or restoring fish stocks a
Amendment 1457 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) mitigate the impacts of fishing gear on the ecosystem and the environment, with particular regard to the protection of biologically sensitive stocks and habitats.
Amendment 1462 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) establish the minimum conservation sizes referred to in Article 15(2).
Amendment 1465 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 d b (new) (db) take account of the socio-economic repercussions of the adoption of such measures.
Amendment 1480 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. All catches of
Amendment 1492 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 1494 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 1 Amendment 1499 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2 Amendment 1507 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 1514 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 1538 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 2 2. Minimum conservation reference sizes based on the best available scientific advice shall be established for the fish stocks set out in paragraph 1.
Amendment 1554 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In the case of fishing vessels flying the flag of an EU Member State and operating outside EU waters, the obligation to retain on board and land all catches shall be subject to the applicable provisions of the RFOs or corresponding bilateral fisheries agreements. Where no such rules exist, the Council and European Parliament may adopt, on a case by case basis, the rules they consider to be necessary to ensuring that the EU fleet is not at a competitive disadvantage to other fleets working in the same area.
Amendment 1556 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1565 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that Union fishing vessels flying their flags are equipped
Amendment 1590 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 1596 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 1 1. Fishing opportunities allocated to Member States shall ensure each Member State relative stability, based on the previous five years of fishing activities, for each fish stock or fishery. The
Amendment 1606 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 2 2. By-catch fishing opportunities may be reserved under the total fishing opportunities, following assessment of the impact of this measure in the various Community fisheries.
Amendment 1623 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 4 4. Member States may, after notifying the Commission, exchange all or part of the fishing opportunities allocated to them, with the reserves provided for in paragraph 2 being respected.
Amendment 1626 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The Commission shall explore what changes should be made to update the principle of relative stability and, in particular, how coastal communities highly dependent on fisheries may be given preference in the distribution of fisheries resources, in line with a more flexible application of that principle. (Paragraph 81 of the report on the Green Paper on the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (2009/2106(INI)) and Paragraph 77 of the European Parliament resolution of 25 February 2010 on the Green Paper on the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (2009/2106(INI)).
Amendment 1634 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 17 – paragraph 1 1. In a multiannual plan established pursuant to Articles 9, 10 and 11
Amendment 1686 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 18 – paragraph 1 After receiving an opinion from the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs), the Member States adopting conservation measures pursuant to Article 17(1) shall notify the Commission, the European Parliament and other interested Member Stat
Amendment 1706 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 20 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 1715 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 20 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.
Amendment 1751 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 22 – paragraph 1 Member States adopting technical measures pursuant to Article 21 shall notify the Commission, other interested Member States and relevant Advisory Councils of such measures, even where they will apply only to vessels flying the flag of the adopting Member State.
Amendment 1764 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 24 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 1825 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) all fishing vessels
Amendment 1836 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) a
Amendment 1870 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 3 3. For the allocation of transferable fishing concessions pertaining to mixed fisheries, Member States shall take account of the likely catch composition of vessels participating in such fisheries, which shall be established by the STECF (Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries) with the assistance of the fishing industry, as represented by the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs).
Amendment 1874 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 4 Amendment 1882 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 5 5. Member States may limit the period of validity of transferable fishing concessions to a period of at least
Amendment 1891 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 6 Amendment 1902 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 7 7. Notwithstanding paragraph 5 and 6, Member States may recall transferable fishing concessions that have not been used on a fishing vessel for a period of three consecutive years, or five years in duly justified cases. The transfer of fishing opportunities to one or more other vessels shall be dealt with in the same way as the use of those opportunities.
Amendment 1915 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall allocate individual fishing opportunities to holders of transferable fishing concessions, on the basis of the quotas granted by the Council, as referred to in Article 28, on the basis of fishing opportunities allocated to the Member States, or established in management plans adopted by Member States in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006. Consequently, this system shall not apply to the remaining species and areas not covered by these obligations, and the present principle of relative stability shall be revised accordingly.
Amendment 1922 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1928 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 3 3. Fishing vessels shall undertake fishing activities only when in possession of sufficient individual fishing opportunities to cover all their potential catch. However, in accordance with the principle of relative stability, those vessels whose fishing capacity is reduced as a consequence of this obligation shall be provided with fishing alternatives.
Amendment 1935 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 4 4. Member States may reserve up to 5% of fishing opportunities in accordance with criteria that justify this action and that they shall establish in their own legislation. They shall establish objectives and transparent criteria for the allocation of such reserved fishing opportunities. Those fishing opportunities may only be allocated to eligible holders of transferable fishing concessions as set out in Article 28(4), (in possible contradiction with Articles 16(4) and 28(2)).
Amendment 1940 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The distribution of individual fishing concessions shall take account of the vessels' history in the fishery and the socio-economic aspects.
Amendment 1941 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 5 5. When allocating transferable fishing concessions in accordance with Article 28 and when allocating fishing opportunities in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, a Member State may provide incentives to fishing vessels deploying selective fishing gear that eliminates unwanted by-catch within the fishing opportunities assigned to that Member State. During a five-year period, these measures shall be compatible with aid for the temporary laying-up of vessels.
Amendment 1947 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 6 Amendment 1979 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 31 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 1988 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 31 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Before 31 December 2017, the Commission shall inform the Council and the European Parliament on the systems of transferable fishing concessions set up by each Member State for the high seas fleet and their contribution to the improved achievement of the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy, with a view to establishing a Community system of fishing concessions and, possibly, the creation of a single market.
Amendment 2005 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – Article 32 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 2007 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – Article 32 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In the interests of making efficient use of each Member State’s fishing opportunities, the existence of cross- border producer groups should be taken into account.
Amendment 2014 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – Article 33 – paragraph 1 Amendment 2073 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 5 – Article 35 – paragraph 2 2. Member States may request the Commission to exclude all fishing vessels, whether subject to a system of transferable fishing concessions established in accordance with Article 27 or not, from the fishing capacity ceilings established in accordance with paragraph 1. In that case the fishing capacity ceilings shall be re- calculated to take into account the fishing vessels which are not subject to a system of transferable fishing concessions.
Amendment 2076 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 5 – Article 35 – paragraph 3 Amendment 2090 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 5 – Article 36 – paragraph 4 4. The information contained in the Union fishing fleet register shall be made available to all Member States. The Co
Amendment 2100 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall collect biological, technical, environmental and socio- economic data necessary for ecosystem based fisheries and aquaculture management, manage them and make them available to end users of scientific data and the public, including bodies designated by the Commission. Those data shall in particular enable the assessment of:
Amendment 2129 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure the national coordination of the collection and management of scientific and socio- economic data for fisheries management. To this end, they shall designate a national correspondent and organi
Amendment 2136 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall coordinate, via the Commission, their data collection activities with other Member States in the same region, and make every effort to coordinate their actions with third countries having sovereignty or jurisdiction over waters in the same region.
Amendment 2140 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 5 5. The collection, management and use of data shall be done in the framework of a multi-annual programme as of 2014, which shall explicitly recognise the implementing protocol, underpinned by a close relationship between the fisheries authorities, scientists and each fisheries sector concerned. Such a multi-annual programme shall include targets for the precision of the data to be collected, and aggregation levels for the collection, management and use of such data.
Amendment 2144 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 6 6. The Co
Amendment 2150 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – Article 38 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt national fisheries scientific data collection, research and innovation programs. They shall coordinate, via the Commission, their fisheries data collection, research (both basic and applied) and innovation activities with other Member States and Union research and innovation frameworks.
Amendment 2167 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 1 1. The Union shall participate in the activities of international organisations dealing with fisheries, in coordination with the Advisory Committee on fisheries and aquaculture, including regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) in line with international obligations and policy objectives and consistent with the objectives set out in Articles 2 and 3, and with other areas of EU policy, particularly development cooperation and economic, financial and technical cooperation with third countries, as enshrined in Article 197 of the TFEU and in agreements signed with third countries.
Amendment 2171 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Union shall contribute to the strengthening of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), thus providing greater protection to EU vessels which, and EU citizens who, may be harmed by third countries, in breach of this convention and of other international treaties signed by the EU.
Amendment 2175 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 2 2. The positions of the Union in international organisations dealing with fisheries and RFMOs shall be based on the best available scientific advice to ensure that fishery resources are maintained
Amendment 2192 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 40 – paragraph 1 The Union shall cooperate with third countries and international organisations dealing with fisheries, including RFMOs, to strengthen compliance with measures, including those on safety at sea, adopted by such international organisations. The EU shall draw on the best available scientific advice in order to achieve and maintain MSY levels, for which reason it shall actively support the development of scientific knowledge within RFMOs and international bodies in collaboration with third countries and the RFMOs themselves. Agreements on reciprocal access shall contain a clause prohibiting discrimination in any form whatsoever between EU investors and nationals of another country.
Amendment 2197 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 1 1. Sustainable Fisheries Agreements with third countries shall establish a legal, economic and environmental governance framework for bilateral fishing activities carried out by Union fishing vessels in third country waters and, where applicable, by third country vessels in European Union waters, in view of the interests of the EU fleet and the supply requirements of the Union market.
Amendment 2208 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 2 2. Union fishing vessels shall only catch surplus of the allowable catch determined by the third country as referred to in Article 62(2) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and identified on the basis of the best available scientific advice and relevant information exchanged between the Union and the third country concerned about the total fishing effort on the affected stocks, in order to ensure that fishery resources remain a
Amendment 2240 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) establish the governance framework, in
Amendment 2245 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 42 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The EU shall establish, in the context of these Agreements, the fishing opportunities that may be exchanged with third countries bearing in mind the needs of their vessels.
Amendment 2285 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) assuring the availability of supplies;
Amendment 2293 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (db) ensuring supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices;
Amendment 2323 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) certainty for aquaculture operators in relation to access to waters and space throughout the Union, with the exception of those referred to in paragraph 4a;
Amendment 2342 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. New growing areas, preferably offshore, shall be set aside for the development of industrial intensive aquaculture, turning the areas currently employed for mollusc production and their protective perimeter belt over to traditional extensive growing methods. The establishment of areas reserved for extensive aquaculture and traditional small-scale fishing shall help to ensure the continued availability in the Union of locally produced, quality seafood noted for its diversity and sustainability.
Amendment 2346 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – Article 44 – paragraph 1 An Advisory Council on aquaculture shall be established in accordance with Article 53, in conjunction with the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (ACFA).
Amendment 2356 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) strengthen the competitiveness of the Union fishery and aquaculture industry, in particular producers, by inter alia promoting quality schemes for agri-food products, for which purpose bodies managing the aforementioned quality schemes shall be granted special consideration;
Amendment 2365 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) contribute to ensuring
Amendment 2371 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) ensure that consumers have a diverse supply of fishery and aquaculture products, the quality and origin of which are certified, and with sufficient information so that their decisions contribute to the achievement of the objectives established in this Regulation.
Amendment 2385 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) consumer information.
Amendment 2394 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 10 – Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the use of
Amendment 2407 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 10 – Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) the establishment of effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions that are the same in all Member States.
Amendment 2424 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 10 – Article 48 – paragraph 1 Amendment 2431 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 11 – Article 49 – paragraph 1 Union financial assistance may be granted to contribute to the achievement of the long-term environmental, economic and social sustainability objectives set out in Articles 2 and 3.
Amendment 2445 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 11 – Article 51 – paragraph 1 1. Union financial assistance toward
Amendment 2448 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 11 – Article 51 – paragraph 2 2. Serious infringements by operators of the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy shall result in temporary or permanent bans on access to the Union financial assistance and/or the application of financial reductions. Such measures, implemented by the Member State, shall be proportionate to the nature, extent, duration and repetition of serious infringement
Amendment 2457 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 52 – paragraph 1 1. Advisory Councils are established for each of the areas of competence set out in Annex III, to promote a balanced representation of all stakeholders, in accordance with Article 54(1), and to contribute to the achievement of the objectives set out in Articles 2 and 3.
Amendment 2461 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The Co
Amendment 2471 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) submit recommendations and suggestions on socio-economic matters relating to fisheries management and aquaculture to the Commission, Parliament or to the Member State concerned
Amendment 2480 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) inform the Commission, Parliament and Member States of problems relating to fisheries management and aquaculture in their area of competence, and, more generally, on the measures set out in Titles II and III of this regulation;
Amendment 2492 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission, Parliament and, where relevant, the Member State concerned, shall reply within
Amendment 2501 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 1 1. Advisory Councils shall be composed of the Member States’ fisheries authorities, organi
Amendment 2514 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 2 2. Each Advisory Council shall consist of a general assembly and an executive committee and shall adopt the measures necessary for its organi
Amendment 2520 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 4 4. The Co
Amendment 2526 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 13 – Article 55 – paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-489.437
|
| 4 |
2011/0294(COD) Trans-European transport network: guidelines
2012/11/10
TRAN
4 amendments...
Amendment 879 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the following rail freight transport sections to the core network: – Almería – Málaga – Algeciras (along the coast) – Granada – Motril – Castejón – Logroño – Miranda – León – Gijón / Avilés – Palencia – Santander – Madrid – Cáceres – Mérida – Mérida – Badajoz – Portuguese border – Mora – Ciudad Real – Mérida
Amendment 881 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the following rail freight transport sections to the comprehensive network: – Almorchón – Córdoba – Ávila – Salamanca – Santander – Oviedo – El Ferrol – León – Zamora – Salamanca – Plasencia – Lleida – Manresa – Barcelona – Los Rosales – Zafra – Madrid – Burgos – Torralba – Soria – Castejón
Amendment 891 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the following rail passenger transport sections to the core network: – Madrid – Toledo – Madrid – Alcázar – Albacete – Murcia – Almería – Málaga – Algeciras (along the coast) – Avilés – Oviedo – Bilbao – Santander – Oviedo – El Ferrol – A Coruña – Castejón – Logroño – Miranda – Mora – Alcázar – Linares – Moreda/Jaén/Córdoba – Ourense – Vigo (via Cercedo) – Ourense – Monforte – Lugo – A Coruña – Palencia – Santander – Segovia – Ávila – Sevilla – Cádiz – Sevilla – Huelva – Portuguese border – Valencia – Alicante (along the coast) – Motilla – Albacete – La Encina – Santiago – Vigo – Portuguese border – Granada – Motril – Antequera – Málaga – Madrid – Ávila – Salamanca – León – Monforte – Torralba – Soria – Castejón – Plasencia – León – Gijón
Amendment 892 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the following rail passenger transport sections to the comprehensive network: – Almendricos – Águilas – Barcelona – Massanet – Barcelona – Puigcerdá – Játiva – Alcoy – Lleida – Manresa – Barcelona – Los Rosales – Zafra – Madrid – Burgos – Villalba – Segovia
source: PE-496.673
|
| 63 |
2011/0380(COD) European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) 2014-2020
2013/01/17
PECH
63 amendments...
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) The achievement of the objectives of the CFP would also be undermined if Union financial assistance under EMFF is paid to Member States who do not comply with their obligation to achieve a stable balance between the fishing fleet and fishing opportunities as defined in Article 34.1 of the regulation of the CFP or with their obligations under the CFP rules related to the public interest of conservation of marine biological resources, such as collecting data and implementing the control obligations.
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) In order to address health and safety needs on board, and consistency with the other policies, the EMFF should only support investments covering safety and hygiene on board for those vessels operating in fisheries which have demonstrated there is no overcapacity. These investments should not increase the catch potential of the vessel.
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 6 (6) 'fisherman' means any person engaging in professional fishing,
Amendment 534 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) promoting
Amendment 558 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) fostering the implementation of the CFP.
Amendment 564 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The achievement of the objectives of the EMFF shall contribute to the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. It shall be pursued through the following six Union priorities, which translate the relevant Thematic Objectives of the Common Strategic Framework (hereinafter CSF)
Amendment 714 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 In addition to the principles enounced in Article 4 of the [Regulation (EU) No […] laying down Common Provisions], the Commission and the Member States shall ensure coordination and complementarity between support from the EMFF and from other Union policies and financial instruments, including the Regulation (EC) No [establishing the Framework Programme for Environment and Climate Change Action (LIFE Framework Programme)]1 and those in the framework of the Union's external action. Coordination between assistance from the EMFF and LIFE Framework Programme shall be achieved in particular, by promoting the funding of activities that complement integrated projects funded under LIFE Framework Programme, as well as by promoting the use of solutions, methods and approaches validated under LIFE Framework Programme. This coordination and complementarity shall be included in the Operational Programme, which defines the policy and the specific instruments.
Amendment 806 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) any onboard investment on vessels where there is no balance between fleet capacity and available fishing opportunities, as defined in Article 34.1 of the CFP Regulation
Amendment 914 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point j – point ii a (new) (ii)(a) flexibilisation of criteria to allow annual transfers of funds
Amendment 919 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point m (m) the designation of the partners referred to in Article 5 of the [Regulation (EU) No [...] laying down Common Provisions] and the results of the consultation of the partners; replacements of or changes to the partners may be carried out during the programme with the agreement of the Monitoring Committee;
Amendment 956 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 1. For the purpose of application of Article 20(1)(o), Member States shall submit to the Commission
Amendment 960 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 3 Amendment 972 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 1. To implement Chapters I and II of Title VI and Article 92, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts,
Amendment 976 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. The multiannual work programme shall set out the objectives pursued, the expected results, the method of implementation and its total amount. It shall also contain a description of the activities to be financed, an indication of the amount allocated to each activity, an indicative implementation timetable, as well as information on their implementation. It shall include for grants the priorities, the essential evaluation criteria and the maximum rate of co- financing, as well as annual reports on budget implementation.
Amendment 987 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. In order to stimulate innovation in fisheries, the EMFF may support projects aiming at developing or introducing new or substantially improved products compared to the state of art, new or improved processes, new or improved management and organisation systems, provided that they contribute to achieving Article 2 of this Regulation.
Amendment 993 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 2 2. Operations financed under this Article must be carried out in collaboration with a scientific
Amendment 1014 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 2. The feasibility studies and advice referred to respectively in paragraph 1(a) and (b) shall be provided by recognised scientific or technical bodies with the required advisory competences
Amendment 1024 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 5 5. The support referred to in paragraph 1 shall take the form of lump sums not exceeding the
Amendment 1030 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point a a) specific actions and pilot projects and also the creation of a network composed by
Amendment 1032 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point b b) the activities carried out
Amendment 1063 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 2. The support referred to in paragraph 1 shall also be granted to spouses of
Amendment 1071 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In order to facilitate diversification and job creation
Amendment 1121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 3 3. Support under paragraph 1(b) shall be granted to small scale coastal fishermen owning
Amendment 1172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 2. The support shall be granted to fishermen or owners of fishing vessels who operate in fisheries in which an effective balance between fishing opportunities and fishing capacity has been shown.
Amendment 1202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – title Support to systems of
Amendment 1223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point a a) the design and development of technical and administrative means necessary for the creation or functioning of
Amendment 1246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 a (new) Article 34a Support for the development and implementation of multiannual plans (Article 9-11 Common Fisheries Policy Regulation) 1. To ensure the effective implementation of the multiannual plans under Articles 9- 11 of the (Common Fisheries Policy Regulation), the EMFF may wish to support: (a) the participation of the actors involved in the design and development of the multiannual plans; (b) the implementation of the multiannual plans; (c) the management of the multiannual plans. The support referred to under (1c) should only be made available to public authorities.
Amendment 1345 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) management, restoration and monitoring NATURA 2000 sites in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora
Amendment 1349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) management, restoration and monitoring of marine protected areas in view of the implementation of the spatial protection measures referred to in Article 1
Amendment 1356 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the participation in other actions aimed at maintaining and enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem services, such as the restoration of specific marine and coastal habitats in support of sustainable fish stocks
Amendment 1376 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) investments on board aimed at reducing the emission of pollutants or green-house gases and increasing energy efficiency of fishing vessels
Amendment 1386 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1405 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1440 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 4 4. The support referred to in paragraph 1 shall only be granted to owners of Union fishing vessels operating in fisheries where there has been shown to be a sufficient balance between fishing opportunities and fishing capacity, as defined in Article 34(1) of the CFP Regulation, and whose vessels are which have carried a fishing activity for at least 60 days at sea during the two years preceding the date of submission of the application.
Amendment 1549 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point b b) developing
Amendment 1632 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) e a) the promotion of equal opportunities, especially with regard to gender equality and the integration of disabled people
Amendment 1636 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new) e b) g) the improvement of working conditions, including reconciling work with family life
Amendment 1639 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 2 – point e c (new) e c) the promotion of professional training and access to work for young people in the fishing and aquaculture sector, especially in the coastal areas most affected by unemployment as a result of the crisis or the Reform of the CFP
Amendment 1641 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 3 3. Support under paragraph (1)(a) shall
Amendment 1659 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 1743 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) forms of extensive aquaculture
Amendment 1774 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 1793 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) da) costs arising from the collection and destruction of dead animals on the farm due to natural causes, farm accidents, slaughter and burial on the farm, on the grounds of animal health and prior official authorisation.
Amendment 1854 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) ensure a
Amendment 1966 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii (iii) direct marketing of fishery products by small scale coastal fishermen, grassroots fishermen, shellfish gatherers and pickers;
Amendment 1992 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The EMFF may also support: (a) media campaigns; (b) the organisation of and participation in trade fairs and events for the sector; (c) innovation in enterprises, as defined for extractive fishing; (d) training in innovation; (e) finding new markets.
Amendment 2018 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) da) Improving the competitiveness and economic viability of enterprises
Amendment 2023 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) db) Improved working conditions, hygiene, and public health standards and quality
Amendment 2029 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d c (new) dc) Increased production capacity when there is a good market outlook
Amendment 2034 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d d (new) dd) Innovation and research in enterprises and organisations in the sector
Amendment 2037 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d e (new) d e) Training workers in innovation
Amendment 2039 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d f (new) d f) Social measures for workers
Amendment 2040 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d g (new) d g) Measures to facilitate dialogue and cooperation among stakeholders
Amendment 2068 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 78 – paragraph 1 1. The EMFF may support the implementation of a Union control, inspection and enforcement system as provided for in Article 46 of the [Regulation on the Common Fisheries Policy] and specified in Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy ( ), as well as installation of the necessary components to ensure the traceability of fisheries products pursuant to Article 58 of the Control Regulation.
Amendment 2135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Support under this Chapter shall foster and contribute to the development and implementation of the Union's Integrated Maritime Policy. It shall:
Amendment 2139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) promoting dialogue and cooperation with and among Member States and stakeholders on marine and maritime issues, including by developing sea-basin strategies;
Amendment 2145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 81 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) Contribute to the development of cross- sectoral initiatives that are mutually beneficial to different mari
Amendment 2157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 82 – paragraph 1 – point a a) studies
Amendment 2159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 82 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 2175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 84 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) voluntary contributions to international organisations; voluntary and compulsory contributions to the RFOs should be financed using the same criteria set out by the Common Financial Framework.
Amendment 2214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 94 – paragraph 3 – point e (e)
Amendment 2307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) providing the Commission, on a
Amendment 2431 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 147 – paragraph 1 1. If the Commission considers that Union funds have not been used in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Regulation or in any other applicable Union legal act, it shall notify the beneficiaries who shall have one month from the date of such notification to send their observations to the Commission
source: PE-496.422
|
| 38 |
2011/0401(COD) Horizon 2020 - Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020
2012/07/24
PECH
38 amendments...
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 Horizon 2020 shall ensure the effective promotion of gender
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new) In research projects involving the participation of human beings as research subjects or end users, Horizon 2020 shall ensure that due account is taken of the gender dimension in research and innovation at all stages of the procedure, including setting priorities, drawing up calls for proposals, assessing and monitoring programmes and projects, as well as conducting negotiations and concluding agreements.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 a (new) Article 15a Human Resources Fostering human resources for science, technology and innovation across Europe shall be a priority in Horizon 2020. Horizon 2020 shall contribute to the promotion and attractiveness of researchers' careers across the Union in the context of the European Research Area.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 b (new) Article 15b Open access With a view to fostering wider use and dissemination of results, and thereby boosting European innovation, free open access to publications resulting from research funded by Horizon 2020 shall be mandatory. Open access to scientific data produced or collected within research funded by Horizon 2020 shall be promoted.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 a (new) Article 17a Synergies with the Structural Funds Horizon 2020 shall contribute to the closing of the research and innovation divide within the European Union by enabling synergies with the Cohesion Policy in support to research and innovation through the coordinated implementation of complementary measures. Where possible, interoperability between the two instruments will be promoted and cumulative or combined funding will be encouraged.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. The integrated approach set out in paragraphs 1 and 2
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Public-private partnerships shall be identified and implemented in an open and transparent way based on all of the following criteria:
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) the scale of impact on industrial competitiveness, sustainable growth and socio-economic issues through the definition of clear and measurable societal and competitiveness objectives, including job creation and educational/training targets, and accountability with regard to the achievement of these objectives;
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) the long-term commitment, including a balanced contribution, from all partners based on a shared vision and clearly defined objectives;
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new) (e a) compliance with the rules of participation of the Horizon 2020 programme, particularly with regard to intellectual property rights, transparency and openness;
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point e b (new) (e b) complementarity with other parts of Horizon 2020 and its alignment with the Union research and innovation strategic agenda;
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point e c (new) (e c) the involvement of all interested partners across the entire value chain, including the end users, SMEs and research institutes, in the partnership.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 Targeted actions with the objective of promoting cooperation with specific third countries or groups of third countries, in particular the EU’s strategic partners, shall be implemented on the basis of common interest and mutual benefit, taking into account their scientific and technological capabilities and market opportunities, and the expected impact.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 Activities to disseminate information and carry out communication activities shall be an integral task under all of the actions supported by Horizon 2020. The inclusion of the gender dimension in dissemination and communication activities will be part of effective schemes and will be assessed.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) actions which bring together results from a range of projects, including those that may be funded from other sources, to provide user-friendly databases and reports that summarise key findings, and their communication and dissemination to the scientific community and the general public;
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall annually monitor the implementation of Horizon 2020, its specific programme and the activities of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology. This shall include information and indicators on cross-cutting topics such as gender, sustainability and climate change, including information on the amount of climate related expenditure.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – paragraph 1 Horizon 2020 has the general objective to build a
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) All three priorities shall include an international dimension. International scientific and technological cooperation is a critical issue for the Union and, as a consequence, Horizon 2020 will support it in three main dimensions: - promoting scientific and technological (S&T) cooperation with the most advanced centres of knowledge in the world, in order to achieve and share the most advanced standards of excellence, and to pursue competition at the highest levels; - promoting international S&T cooperation for capacity building, helping institutions in the Union, from the very start, to contribute to and to share the benefits of the fast expansion of R&D capabilities and human resources world- wide; - promoting S&T cooperation for peace and stability world-wide, recognising the fundamental role that the human and societal values of science and research can play in consolidating fragile societies and mitigating international conflicts.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – paragraph 14 – point b (b) Food security, sustainable agriculture,
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 5 a (new) Furthermore, while 60% of European university graduates are women, only 18% of grade-A researchers are women, as compared to 27% in the USA. The low number of women who are able to pursue scientific careers is a dramatic waste, a loss of talent, and a barrier to excellence in European research.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 – paragraph 2 ERC funding shall be awarded in accordance with the following well- established principles. Scientific excellence shall be the sole criterion on which ERC grants are awarded. The ERC shall operate on a ‘bottom-up’ basis without predetermined priorities. The ERC grants shall be open to individual teams of researchers of any age and from any country in the world, working in Europe. And the ERC shall aim to foster healthy competition across Europe and shall ensure that unconscious gender bias is properly tackled in evaluation procedures.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 – paragraph 5 By 2020, the ERC therefore shall aim to demonstrate: that the best researchers are participating in the ERC’s competitions, that ERC funding has led directly to scientific publications of the highest quality and to the commercialisation and application of innovative technologies and ideas and that the ERC has contributed significantly to making Europe a more attractive environment for the world’s best scientists. In particular, the ERC shall target a measurable improvement in the Union’s share of the world’s top 1 % most highly cited publications. In addition it shall aim at a substantial increase in the number of excellent researchers from outside Europe whom it funds, including a sharp increase in the number of excellent female researchers, and specific improvements in institutional practices and national policies to support top researchers.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 – paragraph 5 a (new) Mobility programmes shall ensure effective equal opportunities between men and women and include specific measures to remove obstacles to the mobility of female researchers.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point b – paragraph 2 Key activities shall be to encourage experienced researchers to broaden or deepen their skills by means of mobility by opening attractive career opportunities in universities, research institutions, businesses, SMEs and other socio- economic groups all over Europe and beyond, offering researchers the opportunity to be trained and to acquire new knowledge in a high-level research organisation in third-country, and subsequently return. Opportunities to restart a research career after a break shall also be supported.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point d – paragraph 2 Key activities shall be, with the aid of a co- funding mechanism, to encourage regional, national and international organisations to create new programmes and to open existing ones to international and intersectoral training, mobility and career development. This will increase the quality of research training in Europe at all career stages, including at doctoral level, will foster free circulation of researchers and scientific knowledge in Europe, will promote attractive research careers by offering open recruitment and attractive working conditions and will support research and innovation cooperation between universities, research institutions and enterprises and cooperation with third countries and international organisations. Special attention should be given to gender equality and structural change.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point e – paragraph 1 The goals are to monitor progress, identify gaps in and barriers to the Marie Curie Actions and to increase their impact. In this context, indicators shall be developed and data related to researchers
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 1 – point 4 a (new) Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – introductory part 2. Food security, sustainable agriculture,
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 The specific objective is to secure sufficient supplies of safe and high quality healthy food and other bio-based products, by developing productive and resource- efficient primary production and food processing systems, fostering related ecosystem services, along side competitive and low carbon supply chains. This will accelerate the transition to a sustainable European bio-economy.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 2 Over the coming decades, Europe will be challenged by increased competition for limited and finite natural resources, by the effects of climate change, in particular on primary production systems (agriculture, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture) and by the need to provide a sustainable, safe and secure food supply for the European and an increasing global population. A 70 % increase of the world food supply is estimated to be required to feed the 9 billion global population by 2050 (research should be commensurate with to the potential of the various food sources). Agriculture accounts for about 10 % of Union greenhouse gases emissions, and while declining in Europe, global emissions from agriculture are projected to increase up to 20 % by 2030. Furthermore, Europe will need to ensure sufficient supplies of raw materials, energy and industrial products, under conditions of decreasing fossil carbon resources (oil and liquid gas production expected to decrease by about 60 % by 2050), while maintaining its competitiveness. Bio-waste (estimated at up to 138 million tonnes per year in the Union, of which up to 40 % is land-filled) represents a huge problem and cost, despite its high potential added value. For example, an estimated 30 % of all food produced in developed countries is discarded. Major changes are needed to reduce this amount by 50 % in the Union by 2030
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 2 A fully functional European bio-economy – encompassing the sustainable production of renewable resources from land, marine and aquatic environments and their conversion into food, bio-based products and bioenergy as well as the related public goods - will generate high European added value. Managed in a sustainable manner, it can reduce the environmental footprint of primary production and the supply chain as a whole. It can increase their competitiveness and provide jobs and business opportunities for rural and coastal development. The food security, sustainable agriculture, and overall bio- economy – related challenges are of a European and global nature. Actions at Union level are essential to bring together clusters to achieve the necessary breadth and critical mass to complement efforts made by a single or groups of Member States. A multi-actor approach will ensure the necessary cross-fertilising interactions between researcher, businesses, farmers/producers, advisors and end-users. The Union level is also necessary to ensure coherence in addressing this challenge across sectors and with strong links to relevant Union policies. Coordination of research and innovation at Union level will stimulate and help to accelerate the required changes across the Union.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 3 Research and innovation will interface with a wide spectrum of Union policies and related targets, including the Common Agriculture Policy (in particular the Rural Development Policy) and the European Innovation Partnership 'Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability', the Common Fisheries Policy, the Integrated Maritime Policy, the European Climate Change Programme, the Water Framework Directive, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, the Forestry Action Plan, the Soil Thematic Strategy, the Union's 2020 Biodiversity Strategy, the Strategic Energy Technology Plan, the Union's innovation and industrial policies, external and development aid policies, plant health strategies, animal health and welfare strategies and regulatory frameworks to protect the environment, health and safety, to promote resource efficiency and climate action, and to reduce waste. A better integration of the full cycle from fundamental research
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point c – introductory part (c) Unlocking the potential of
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point d a (new) (da) Cross-cutting marine and maritime research The exploitation of living and non-living marine resources, the use of different sources of marine energy and the wide range of different uses that is made of the seas raise cross-cutting scientific and technological challenges. Seas and oceans also play a crucial role in climate regulation, but they are heavily impacted by inland, coastal and maritime human activities and by climate change. The overall aim is to develop cross-cutting marine and maritime scientific and technological knowledge with a view to unlocking the blue growth potential across the range of marine and maritime industries, while protecting the marine environment and adapting to climate change. This strategic coordinated approach for marine and maritime research across all challenges and pillars of Horizon 2020 will also support the implementation of relevant Union policies to help deliver key blue growth objectives.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 5 – point 5.1 – paragraph 4 The growing impacts from climate change and environmental problems, such as ocean acidification, changes in ocean circulation, the increase in seawater temperature, ice melting in the Arctic, land degradation and use, water shortages, chemical pollution and biodiversity loss, indicate that the planet is approaching its sustainability boundaries. For example, without improvements in efficiency, water demand is projected to overshoot supply by 40 % in 20 years time. Forests are disappearing at an alarmingly high rate of 5 million hectares per year. Interactions between resources can cause systemic risks – with the depletion of one resource generating an irreversible tipping point for other resources and ecosystems. Based on current trends, the equivalent of more than two planet Earths will be needed by 2050 to support the growing global population.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 5 – point 5.2 – paragraph 4 Addressing the availability of raw materials calls for co-ordinated research and innovation efforts across many disciplines and sectors to help provide safe, economically feasible, environmentally sound and socially acceptable solutions along the entire value chain (exploration, extraction, processing, re-use, recycling and substitution). Water challenges include water use in rural, urban and industrial environments and the protection of aquatic ecosystems. Innovation in these fields will provide opportunities for growth and jobs, as well as innovative options involving science, technology, the economy, policy and governance. For this reason,
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6.3 – point 6.3.1 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) strive to set European models for social cohesion and well-being as international benchmarks; and make efforts to comply with the ILO’s recommendations on fostering research and training pertaining to health, hygiene and safety in the workplace.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – section 5 – point 1 – paragraph 2 Europe is facing a number of structural weaknesses when it comes to innovation capacity and the ability to deliver new services, products and processes. Among the main issues at hand are Europe's relatively poor record in talent attraction and retention; the underutilisation of existing research strengths in terms of creating economic or social value;
source: PE-492.798
|
| 34 |
2011/2290(INI) Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy - overarching communication
2012/09/05
PECH
34 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 17 a (new) - having regard to Directive 2010/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity and repealing Council Directive 86/613/EEC[1], [1] OJ L 180, 15.7.2010, p.1.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the present communication recalls that the previous CFP failed to achieve its key objectives: numerous stocks are overfished; the economic situation of parts of the EU fleet is fragile despite
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas there is a need for rigorous social, economic and environmental data, and that according to some estimates 75 % of the EU’s estimated fish stocks are overexploited, more than 60 % of stocks in European waters are fished beyond the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY), and the EU is losing approximately EUR 1.8 billion per year in potential income from its failure to manage fisheries sustainably;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas artisanal and small-scale fishing fleets and areas that are heavily dependent on
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H bis (new) Ha. whereas there is a need for the representatives of the sectors of industrial and small-scale fleets and of aquaculture to be involved in the definition and development of the new CFP;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) H a. Whereas women play a fundamental role in the processing and aquaculture sector, in the exercise of ancillary management and administration tasks, as well as in shellfish gathering; and they are also, although to a smaller extent, active in the catching sector; however, this important contribution is very often not duly recognised and rewarded;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H ter (new) Hb. whereas the Treaty of Lisbon obliges us to ensure coherence in Union policies, including in the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the common fisheries policy
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that the EU’s
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that incentives should be offered to those who fish sustainably using selective and environment-friendly fishing methods, in order to ensure
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Supports the management of fisheries resources on the basis of MSY, in order to phase out overfishing wherever it occurs, ensure biological security and achieve sustainable stock conservation;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that the objective of achieving MSY based on fishing mortality (FMSY) should be established immediately, a
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Underlines, however, the difficulties involved in implementing the MSY principle, in particular in the case of mixed fisheries or where scientific data on fish stocks are unavailable or unreliable;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Understands the Commission’s motivations when proposing to implement a discard ban by 2016, and considers that it is right to view such practices as unacceptable in principle, particularly given their harmful impact on numerous essential evaluations relating to sustainable stock management, sound scientific advice, marine ecosystem surveillance and the
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that a gradual ban on discards should only be put in place if accompanied by technical measures to reduce unwanted bycatch and incentives to encourage selective fishing practices, provided the ecosystem balance is maintained;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the need for more scientific research to develop tackle and fishing techniques in such a way as to avoid
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes that the existing technology for reducing or eliminating discards is not equally effective for all types of fisheries; in this respect, calls on the Commission to promote partnerships between scientists and fishermen, consider their opinions when drawing up its policies and assist Member States in the development of new fishing techniques;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Expresses its doubts over the proposals relating to the market in bycatches, and stresses that, in case of implementation, adequate safeguards that comply with a predominantly social orientation should be provided in order to avoid the emergence of a parallel market that would paradoxically encourage fishermen to increase their catch;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the discard ban should be based on a step-by-step introduction by fishery, to make it easier for the sector to adapt; stresses that the producers’ organisations should be taken into consideration and be actively involved in the gradual implementation of such a ban;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Asks the Commission to a
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 bis (new) 17a. Consumers will be guaranteed a diversified range of fish and aquaculture products of certified quality and origin, and sufficient information thereon;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 ter (new) 17b. Recalls the obligation contained in the Treaty of Lisbon to ensure coherence of the Union’s policies, including in the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Believes that the reliability and availability of data must be one of the highest priorities of the reform; is concerned at the lack of reliable and available scientific data as well as socio- economic impact evaluations needed for sound scientific advice;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to make proposals on effective quality data collection for scientists and for it to be harmonised at the European Union level; urges it, at the same time, to establish a framework, which takes into account the socio-economic impact, for decision- making in data-deficient situations and to come up with scientific models on which to base multi-speci
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses the importance of involving fishermen, as well as all stakeholders, alongside scientists in contributing to the collection and analysis of socio-economic and environmental information and the active development of research partnerships;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Notes that the proposal to introduce ‘Transferable Fishing Concessions’ (TFCs), contained in the basic regulation, raises concerns regarding the concentration and creation of monopolies; stresses that in a number of countries transferable fishing rights have allowed fishing overcapacity to be reduced, which is commendable; emphasises, however, that adequate safeguards would need to be introduced in order to protect small-scale and artisanal coastal fishing (including harvesting shellfish and other traditional and extensive aquaculture activities as well as the natural cultivation of molluscs in coastal waters), which is the most economically endangered part of the industry but also that providing most of the jobs and economic activity in coastal regions;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Believes that such a measure should offer priority access to those who fish in a socially and environmentally responsible way; believes that TFCs should not be the only measure proposed for reducing overcapacity, and that a Member State should be exempted from the obligation to introduce TFCs if it achieves the necessary overcapacity reduction without their use; a census system should be maintained in such a way that the transferability of quotas is limited to vessels within the same census, which means the accumulation of fishing rights should be limited, and the historicity of the vessels in the fishery, as well as the socio- economic aspects thereof, must be taken into account when distributing individual fishing concessions;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Considers that the economic viability of the fisheries sector is affected by the recent rise in oil prices; calls on the Commission to come up with suitable measures to improve fuel efficiency in the fisheries and aquaculture sector, to alleviate the difficult economic situation in which European fishermen and fish farmers find themselves, and to propose in this respect an action plan for coastal regions and islands;
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29 a. Considers that women's role in the fisheries sector should be given greater legal and social recognition and recompense; insists that women in the fisheries sector in every respect enjoy rights equal to men's, for example as far as membership and eligibility in governing bodies of fisheries organisations is concerned; considers that the spouses and life partners of fishermen supporting the family undertaking should de facto be given a legal status and social benefits equivalent to those enjoyed by people with self-employed status, as provided for by Directive 2010/41/EU; considers further that funding from the European Fisheries Fund and the future European Maritime and Fisheries Fund should be made available for training specifically tailored for women working in the fisheries sector;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Believes that the reform of the CFP may, in the short term, lead to job losses, especially in the catching sector, thus affecting the growth of coastal communities and islands; stresses, in this respect, that there is a need for accompanying socio-economic measures, including professional cooperation and a plan for jobs, in order to make the sector more attractive to young people and provide incentives to enter the sector; calls on the Commission to examine and promote cooperation with the European Investment Bank in order to leverage investment in the sector;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 bis (new) 30a. Considers it necessary to promote the development of innovations and activities related to the field of fisheries, which can offset the loss of jobs due to the adjustments arising from the reform of the CFP; urges the Commission to develop specific programmes dedicated to the development of fishing tourism and other areas of economic development linked to the sea and fishing activity;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Shares the view expressed in the Commission proposal regarding the need for adaptation and specific measures, based on the disparate realities of the European fishing and aquaculture industry, and especially in the case of the Union’s coastal areas and outermost regions; supports the idea of establishing regionalisation as one of the main instruments of this new governance, in order to respond adequately to the needs of each sea basin and incentivise adherence to rules adopted at European level;
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Believes
source: PE-489.362
|
| 3 |
2011/2292(INI) Small scale and artisanal fisheries and the CFP reform
2012/08/05
PECH
3 amendments...
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 3 – vocational training, in particular for women working in the fisheries sector, in order to grant them better access to managerial and technical jobs related to fishing;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 6 – support for sustainable shellfishing practices,
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 7 –
source: PE-487.773
|
| 41 |
2011/2318(INI) External dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy
2012/08/05
PECH
41 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 bis (new) - having regard to the FAO Report on the State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2010,
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas 85 % of fish stocks globally for which information is available are either fully exploited or overexploited, according to the most recent assessment by the FAO, despite the progress mentioned that is being made on a global scale in reducing ratios of exploitation and the recovery of overexploited stocks and marine ecosystems, through effective management actions;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A bis (new) Aa. whereas fisheries are of strategic importance for the social and economic welfare of coastal communities, aside from the considerable contribution they make in terms of development, employment and the public supply of fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans in the interests of preserving dietary balance throughout the European Union;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the EU is one of the few players that has a strong presence in all the world’s oceans through
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas quotas in RFMOs are primarily based on the development of historical catches, for which
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas there is in many cases insufficient data on fish stocks that the EU is fishing, or which are destined for the internal market, in terms of their status and of total removals by local fleets and other third country fleets to further the development of sustainable fishing, trade and consumption;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F bis (new) Fa. whereas rigorous scientific studies will be required in order to determine in which fisheries fleet overcapacity is occuring or may occur, studies which must be accompanied by an assessment of the socio-economic and employment impact that a reduction of fleet capacity would have in each one of the fisheries;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F ter (new) Fb. whereas the CFP should serve as a reference tool that enables the EU to demonstrate to the world how fishing can be practised as a responsible activity and how to promote improvement of the international management of fisheries;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F quater (new) Fc. whereas the EU must assume a key role in the mobilisation, involvement and international campaign in the community against IUU fishing;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication and the many positive proposals it includes for encouraging the sustainability of the EU’s overall fishing and related activities outside EU waters; considers, however, that the scope of the document is not broad enough,
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 bis (new) 1a. Considers that the objectives that must serve to guide the external action of the CFP are to defend Community fishing interests in coherence with EU external policy, using FAO, ILO and UN recommendations as reference;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 ter (new) 1b. Considers it of major importance to coordinate foreign policy and cooperation policy for the purpose of establishing sustainable fishing agreements and provide the necessary synergies to make a more effective contribution to the development of associated third countries;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the size of the EU market for fish and the geographical range of activities by EU-flagged and EU-owned vessels impose a high level of responsibility on the Union for ensuring that its fisheries’
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that fishing by EU interests inside and outside Union waters should be based upon the same standards in terms of eco
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates its belief
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to support clearly defined principles and objectives for
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Believes that the EU should launch an initiative at UN level to set up a global catch and traceability documentation scheme as a key tool to combat IUU fishing and ensure fair trade and responsible consumption;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 bis (new) 10a. States the need to create mechanisms for promoting fishery products that are sustainably sourced from an ecological perspective, and fair from a social perspective, within the EU and beyond;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Regrets, however, that EU bilateral agreements have not always fulfilled these potential benefits, while recognising that much improvement has been made since the previous reform; the assessment of populations, the transparency and monitoring of compliance with its objectives, in particular, of the resulting benefits for the local population, and improving governance are key for obtaining them;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes positively the intention of the Commission to include several provisions in future bilateral agreements, including respect for the principle of limiting access to resources that are scientifically demonstrated to be surplus
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 bis (new) 13a. The clause on human rights must be implemented without discrimination and apply equally to all countries, not only to fishing agreements but also to trade agreements; through the World Trade Organisation (WTO) we must work towards penalising production in countries that have yet to recognise human rights or use child labour in manufacturing production, as well as discriminating against women by not rewarding or recognising their activities and their economic contribution in fisheries and aquaculture.
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Reaffirms that EU vessels should not compete with local fishermen for the same resources and that cooperation between local and EU operators should be facilitated;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Believes that the EU must make increased efforts to help provide the coastal States with which it negotiates bilateral agreements with sufficient data and information for reliable stock assessments, and
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20 a. Urges the Commission to try during the negotiations of SFAs to obtain that the coastal State dedicates a minimum part of the sectoral support for development granted under the SFA to projects which have as their objective the recognition, promotion and diversification of women's role in the fisheries sector, ensuring the application of the principle of equal treatment and opportunities for women and men concerning in particular training and access to funding and loans.
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Insists that the Commission closely monitor the implementation of bilateral agreements, with annual reports being sent to Parliament and the Council, as well as evaluations performed by external, independent experts to be sent to the co- legislators prior to the negotiation of new protocols, and all of
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Underlines the need for Parliament to be wholly involved in
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 bis (new) 22a. Supports the introduction of scientific audits to evaluate fish populations prior to negotiating agreements and that the third country notifies of the fishing effort of the fleets of other countries in its waters in order for these objectives to be effective;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Is convinced that full transparency on catches, payments and implementation of sectoral support will be a
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 bis (new) 25a. Bilateral conventions should be introduced to encourage Community fisheries investments in countries where at present there are no association agreements, because there are no excess fishing opportunities, and to contribute as a result towards sustainable fishing; also in these cases, coordination between European development funding and the bilateral agreements funding should be a top priority;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Urges the EU to take the lead in strengthening RFMOs in order to improve their performance, including by means of regular reviews by independent bodies of the extent to which they achieve their objectives, and to ensure that the recommendations made in such reviews are genuinely, rapidly and fully implemented
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Believes that RFMOs must ensure the Maximum Sustainable Development of resources and develop management systems that provide for an equitable and fair resource allocation based upon transparent environmental and social criteria, rather than the simplistic criterion of historical catches, while ensuring that management and conservation measures are fully implemented by all members;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 bis (new) 32a. Believes that before establishing charges for high sea fishing, the impact that this may have on the fleet must be assessed, ensuring that no unnecessary costs are added that could result in unfair competition or prove discriminatory for normal practice within EU territorial waters or those of third countries; these resources must be used transparently so as to encourage them to contribute to the development of responsible fishing and the improved working of the RFMOs.
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Considers that the external dimension of the CFP is not limited to bilateral fisheries agreements and the EU’s participation in RFMOs but also includes European external fisheries investments, international trade in fisheries and aquaculture products, private agreements between EU shipowners and third countries, joint ventures by EU companies in third countries and activities by EU nationals on non-EU vessels;
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 bis (new) 33a. We consider that European fisheries investments should be included as a third component in the external dimension of the CFP, together with fishing agreements and the RFMOs; the CFP must encourage sustainable external fisheries investment on the grounds that they are useful for making our fisheries more competitive and consolidating the EU’s position globally, thereby emphasising its role in the generation of wealth and the creation of employment, both in the EU Member States and in third countries.
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 bis (new) 33a. Believes in close collaboration with the players involved in external waters and represented on the Regional Advisory Council for high seas/long distance fleet (LDRAC), in particular, with business associations, trade union organisations, professionals fishing under bilateral agreements, RFMOs and in international waters, as well as with businesses that have investments in fisheries in third countries and possess extensive knowledge of the fisheries in those countries, which would provide a better understanding of resources, fishing areas and fisheries businesses in third countries.
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 ter (new) 33b. Believes that the CFP must promote strategies for Corporate Social Responsibility, in order to assume fully our social responsibilities, in line with the EU Strategy 2011–2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 bis (new) 34a. Believes in the need to increase human and financial resources dedicated to external fisheries policy and that in this regard the LDRAC could provide considerable assistance;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Expresses its impatience with the Commission for not having added vessels to be included on the EU IUU list other than those listed by the RFMOs, nor having proposed a list of non-cooperating countries, despite the IUU Regulation having been in force for over two years; we agree with the need to seek support from our principal social partners in order to eradicate IUU fishing in all oceans and Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ);
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 40. Encourages banks and other lending institutions to incorporate assessments of the e
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 – indent 1 – be preceded by e
source: PE-489.341
|
| 5 |
2012/2297(INI) Blue growth - Enhancing sustainable growth in the EU's marine, maritime transport and tourism sectors
2013/03/27
PECH
5 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that aquaculture should contribute to food production on a sustainable basis throughout the Union so as to contribute to guaranteeing long-term food security and consumer protection; considers that the sustainable development and innovation of the sustainable aquaculture industry should be encouraged, improving the quality of life in coastal and rural areas;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that a successful blue economy requires secure EU maritime borders, with a view to ensuring the protection of the marine environment, fisheries controls, the combating of illegal fishing and law enforcement;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the importance of the future European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) in supporting the sustainable development of fisheries and aquaculture and for economic diversification in fishing communities, particularly in respect of small-scale coastal fisheries, vocational training for women and young people and attracting new entrepreneurs to the sector;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses the importance of coastal regions and of sustainable coastal and maritime tourism for the development of an all-inclusive maritime, social and green economy.
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that due account must be paid of the particular geography of the outermost regions;
source: PE-508.043
|
Dolores GARCÍA-HIERRO CARABALLO on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |