Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ
Constituencies
-
Spain
Partido Popular
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
Spain
Partido Popular
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Spain
Partido Popular
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Spain
Partido Popular
1999/07/20 - 2002/01/11
-
Spain
Partido Popular
1999/07/20 - 2002/01/11
-
Spain
Partido Popular
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
-
Spain
Partido Popular
1994/07/19 - 1999/07/19
Groups
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
2012/02/03 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
-
PPE
Member of the Bureau
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
2009/07/21 - 2012/02/02
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
2009/07/14 - 2009/07/20
-
PPE-DE
Member of the Bureau
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
2004/08/31 - 2009/07/13
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
2004/07/20 - 2004/08/30
-
PPE-DE
Vice-Chair
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
1999/09/30 - 2002/01/11
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
1999/07/20 - 1999/09/29
-
PPE
Member of the Bureau
Group of the European People's Party (Christian-Democratic Group)
1997/01/20 - 1999/07/19
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian-Democratic Group)
1994/07/19 - 1997/01/19
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian-Democratic Group)
1994/07/19 - 1997/01/19
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian-Democratic Group)
1997/01/20 - 1999/07/19
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
1999/07/20 - 1999/09/29
-
PPE-DE
Vice-Chair
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
1999/09/30 - 2002/01/11
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
2004/07/20 - 2004/08/30
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
2004/08/31 - 2009/07/13
EP staff
Show earlier staff positions...
- Member of Conference of Committee Chairs 2009/07/20 - 2012/01/18
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Fisheries | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia | 2009/09/16 | 2009/10/18 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2009/09/16 | 2009/10/11 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) | 2004/09/15 | 2007/03/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union | 1999/10/06 | 2002/01/11 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America and Mexico | 1996/06/21 | 1997/01/15 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union | 1995/07/12 | 1996/01/19 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union | 1994/11/17 | 1995/07/11 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union | 1994/11/17 | 1995/07/11 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union | 1995/07/12 | 1996/01/19 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America and Mexico | 1996/06/21 | 1997/01/15 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union | 1999/10/06 | 2002/01/11 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) | 2004/09/15 | 2007/03/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
Contact
Online
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45239
- Fax
- +322 28 49239
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 11E142
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75239
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79239
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T09143
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Parlamento Europeo
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 11E142
- B-1047 Bruselas
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2013/0007(COD) | Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy: aligning the Regulation with the TFEU (Commission delegated and implementing powers) |
| Responsible | 2012/2235(INI) | For a comprehensive EU fishery strategy in the Pacific region |
| Shadow | 2012/0215(NLE) | EU/Mauritius Fisheries Partnership Agreement and Protocol: fishing opportunities and financial contribution |
| Shadow | 2012/0162(COD) | Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing: alignment of the Regulation with the TFEU (Commission delegated and implementing powers) |
| Shadow | 2011/2291(INI) | Reporting obligations under Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the CFP |
| Shadow | 2011/0434(COD) | Conservation of fish stocks: measures in relation to countries allowing non-sustainable fishing |
| Shadow | 2011/0218(COD) | Sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea: alignment of the Regulation with the TFEU (Commission delegated powers) |
| Shadow | 2011/0195(COD) | Common Fisheries Policy |
| Shadow | 2011/0144(COD) | Fish stock conservation: multiannual recovery plan for bluefin tuna in the Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean |
| Responsible | 2011/0047(NLE) | Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fishery Resources in the South Pacific Ocean: conclusion |
| Responsible | 2010/0389(NLE) | Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing |
| Opinion | 2010/0248(NLE) | EU/Morocco Agreement: reciprocal liberalisation measures on agricultural products, processed agricultural products, fish and fishery products (replacing Protocols 1, 2 and 3, their Annexes and amendments to the EC/Morocco Euro-Mediterranean Agreement) |
| Responsible | 2010/0097(CNS) | Fishery products, live bivalve molluscs and by-products thereof: rules for imports from Greenland |
| Opinion | 2009/2002(BUD) | 2010 budget: section III, Commission |
| Responsible | 2009/0051(COD) | North-East Atlantic Fisheries: scheme of control and enforcement; NEAF Convention on multilateral cooperation (repeal. Regulation (EC) No 2791/1999) |
| Responsible | 2009/0041(CNS) | Conservation of fishery resources: recovery plan for Greenland halibut in the framework of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation NAFO (amend. Regulation (EC) No 2115/2005) |
| Responsible | 2009/0038(CNS) | EC/Guinea agreement: Fisheries Partnership Agreement |
| Opinion | 2008/0250(NLE) | EC/Pacific States agreement: Interim Partnership Agreement |
| Responsible | 2008/0093(CNS) | EC/Mauritania fisheries agreement: protocol for the period 1 August 2008 to 31 July 2012 |
| Opinion | 2007/2183(INI) | Policy coherence for development and the effects of the EU's exploitation of certain biological natural resources on development in West Africa |
| Responsible | 2007/0222(NLE) | Fisheries partnership agreements concluded between the European Community and third countries: authorisation of the Commission to approve modifications to protocols |
| Responsible | 2006/2224(INI) | Implementing sustainability in EU fisheries through maximum sustainable yield |
| Responsible | 2006/0029(CNS) | EC/Seychelles fisheries agreement: partnership agreement, replacing the framework agreement (repeal. Regulation (EEC) No 1708/87) |
| Responsible | 2005/0168(CNS) | EC/Solomon Islands Fisheries Partnership Agreement |
| Responsible | 2005/0110(CNS) | Fisheries agreements: transmission of applications for fishing licences to third countries before expiration of a protocol to a fisheries agreement (amend. Regulation (EC) No 3317/94) |
| Responsible | 2005/0092(CNS) | EC/Comoros agreement: tuna fishing, protocol for the period from 1st January 2005 to 31st December 2010 |
| Opinion | 2004/2001(BUD) | 2005 budget: section III, Commission |
| Responsible | 2003/0229(CNS) | Conservation of fishery resources: exploitation in the Mediterranean Sea (amend. Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93; repeal. Regulation (EC) No 1626/94) |
| Responsible | 2001/0161(CNS) | EC/Madagascar fisheries agreement: protocol for the period from 21st May 2001 to 20 May 2004 |
| Responsible | 2001/0035(CNS) | Fisheries sector: structural assistance, extension of the derogation (derog. Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999) |
| Responsible | 1999/0058(CNS) | Fisheries, Inter-American tropical tuna Commission ICCAT: temporary adhesion of Spain to the Convention |
| Responsible | 1999/0047(CNS) | Fishery and aquaculture products: common organisation of the market COM |
| Responsible | 1998/0221(CNS) | Conservation of fishing resources: statistical monitoring of trade in bluefin tuna (amend. Regul. 858/94/EC) |
| Opinion | 1998/0090(AVC) | Agenda 2000: general regulation governing Structural Funds, revision for the period 2000-2006 |
| Responsible | 1996/2142(INI) | The common fisheries policy after the year 2002 |
| Responsible | 1996/0234(CNS) | Reference laboratories for the monitoring of marine biotoxins (amend. dec. 93/383/EEC) |
| Responsible | 1996/0091(CNS) | Conservation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean, transitional measures into regulation 1626/94/EC |
| Responsible | 1995/0061(CNS) | Cotton: System of aid introduced by Protocol 4 annexed to the Act of Accession of Greece, fifth adjustment |
Born
1948/10/19 Léon- Graduate in humanities with specialisation in geography; special prize on graduation (1965-1970). Graduate in law (1980-1985). Official in Ministry of Public Works (since 1970). EPP Group official (1986-1994).
- Member of the European Parliament (1994-2002). First Vice-Chairwoman of the EPP-ED Group. Chairwoman of the Committee on Fisheries (1997-1999).
- Secretary-General for Maritime Fisheries (2002-2004).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 1 |
2009/2002(BUD) 2010 budget: section III, Commission
2009/07/24
PECH
1 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Expresses its concern over the proposed reduction in the resources available under chapter 11 04 'Governance of the Common Fisheries Policy'; given the importance of Regional Advisory Councils (RACs), it considers that an appropriate funding is indispensable for better governance of the CFP; considers, in addition, that the Commission should introduce greater flexibility and transparency into the rules governing the financial activities of the RACs, which are currently subject to an excess of interpretative criteria on the Commission's part, with a view to ensuring that existing rigidities no longer prevent the RACs from spending the entirety of the limited budget allocated to them;
source: PE-427.202
|
| 48 |
2009/2106(INI) Green Paper on reform of the common fisheries policy
2009/12/17
PECH
48 amendments...
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas fisheries is one of the predominant activities that use the sea and its resources and should thus be considered a key part of IMP management,
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas this new reform of the CFP should already constitute a better alignment of fisheries policy with the single market rules,
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas the conservation and management policy has been the greatest failure of the CFP and has not been amended or updated since its creation, and whereas it is therefore necessary to focus on designing a new fisheries conservation and management model,
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J b (new) Jb. whereas the European Union, by virtue of commitments undertaken at international fora, has defined the objectives of its fisheries policy to be management by means of Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) and the ecosystem approach,
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M a (new) Ma. whereas small-scale fleets and those of a larger-scale industrial nature have very different characteristics and problems that cannot be fitted into a uniform model and thus have to be treated differently,
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P a (new) Pa. whereas the CFP's external policy is essential to guarantee supplies to industry and consumers since over one-third of Community production comes from international fishing grounds and waters belonging to the EEZs of third countries,
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q a (new) Qa. whereas many of the jobs in the fisheries sector are currently being filled by workers from third countries, as this work is becoming less and less attractive for young people in the Community,
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R a (new) Ra. whereas the sharp decline in the prices for most fish species in recent years has had a very negative impact on producers' incomes whilst these producers have, at the same time, seen increases in their production costs that they cannot pass on in the initial sales price,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R b (new) Rb. whereas the shift in the market structures for fisheries products and the move away from an acceptable balance between producers and buyers to a situation that may increasingly be seen as an oligopoly by the latter, as a result of the concentration of distribution and purchasing chains;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R c (new) Rc. whereas many of the exports by third countries are creating a serious problem for the competitiveness of the Community sector, as they do not comply with the standards and control systems that apply to Community producers and consumers and the increase in production costs that these entail,
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R d (new) Rd. whereas this situation of falling prices also does not benefit the consumer in the longer term,
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Reiterates that the main objective of the CFP should be to guarantee the future of both fisheries resources and of fishermen, through the recovery of fish populations and restoring the economic viability of the sector;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises that, with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Supports differentiated treatment for the deep-sea fisheries sectors and those whose structure and business capabilities are more on a par with other economic activities, and for smaller-scale fisheries with closer links to coastal areas and specific markets, a lower unit production volume and different cost and employment structures;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Points to the need for greater investment in research and scientific knowledge in the fisheries field, and for the fisheries sector to be dovetailed more effectively into the subject areas covered by the framework programmes to promote research; emphasises that the new ecosystem approach will involve multidisciplinary research;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges the Commission to draw up
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Emphasises that professional qualifications are a key factor both in improving productivity and raising wages; points out that skilled jobs are a feature of technologically advanced businesses and imply better remuneration, better knowledge of standards (and thus a greater likelihood of complying with them) and a better understanding of, and respect for, the interaction between fishing and ecosystems;
Amendment 297 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32.
Amendment 307 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Considers that any change in the management model should include a transitional application period exclusively within each Member State, in order to avoid any sudden changes and to assess the results before extending their application to Community level;
Amendment 308 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 b (new) 32b. Also considers that any new management model should build on the existing arrangements based on relative stability, but sees it as inevitable that the future CFP will have to recognise the current situation regarding the use of quotas, giving the system sufficient flexibility to stop hampering the economic effectiveness and profitability of investments,
Amendment 319 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Maintains that Regional Advisory Councils (RACs)
Amendment 327 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34.
Amendment 336 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34a. Emphasises that for a control system to function properly, there have to be guarantees that it is applied uniformly and without discrimination;
Amendment 337 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 b (new) 34b. Takes the view that the CFP control policy should take the following into account: - more direct control by the European Commission, making maximum use of the possibilities offered by the creation of the Fisheries Control Agency, - legislative simplification through the adoption of standards that are best adapted to achieving the objectives, - application of the principle that the party that breaches legislation must repair the damage done to other operators, and - a bottom-up decision-making process, which will facilitate the implementation of the control system;
Amendment 338 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 c (new) 34c. Believes that the current catch control system should be replaced by controls on the fishing effort because this is much simpler and will help eliminate discards;
Amendment 348 #
Motion for a resolution Title after Paragraph 35 (new) Management of Community fishing fleets
Amendment 349 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35a. Stresses that the scope of the reform of the CFP should seek solutions that ensure a stable and permanent balance between fishery resources and fleet capacity;
Amendment 350 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 b (new) 35b. Reiterates the importance of adjusting the capacity of the fishing fleet to the resources available, but stresses that the Commission and Member States should quantify the actual excess capacity, identifying which fleets are too large in relation to their current fishing opportunities;
Amendment 351 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 c (new) 35c. Is in favour of setting up a Scrapping Fund as an effective and short-term solution to the problems of overcapacity, with rules to avoid its use being blocked by the Member States;
Amendment 352 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 d (new) 35d. Considers that the fishing fleet should be capable in the longer term of financing itself and remaining competitive in a liberalised fisheries products market, but stresses that this can only happen under a CFP whose fisheries management model facilitates the profitability of companies;
Amendment 389 #
Motion for a resolution Title before Paragraph 41 External relations
Amendment 393 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 a (new) 41a. Considers that the CFP's external actions should be guided by the objectives of defending Community fisheries interests in line with EU external policy;
Amendment 398 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43.
Amendment 403 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 a (new) 43a. Calls, in addition, for the financial compensation in the fisheries partnership agreements to make a clear distinction between the part relating to the commercial component and that relating to fisheries development cooperation with third countries, in the interests of greater budgetary transparency;
Amendment 408 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 a (new) 44a. Is convinced that the fisheries partnership agreements should be negotiated on a sound scientific basis and understands that other necessary progress should require the inclusion of all technical measures in the negotiating process and substantial improvements in the mechanisms for implementing the provisions contained in the agreement;
Amendment 409 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 b (new) 44b. Calls for the sector affected to be consulted during the negotiating process and for the Long Distance RAC to participate as an observer in the joint committees provided for in the agreements;
Amendment 410 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 c (new) 44c. Considers that the growing complexity of the situation, the need for a more effective follow-up to the agreements and the increasing number of tasks involved in proper participation in the RFOs call for an increase in DG MARE's human and material resources, and that the possible decentralisation of executive management to the Member States should be investigated;
Amendment 413 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 a (new) 45a. Considers it a good decision for the European Commission to have made the IMP one of its priorities, and emphasises that the new ecosystem approach establishes a direct priority link between the CFP and this IMP;
Amendment 415 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 b (new) 45b. States that fishing is one of the economic activities that has the greatest impact on ecosystems in that it obtains significant resources from these, and that it is the one most affected by the actions of other activities in these ecosystems, such as tourism, maritime transport, coastal urban development, etc.;
Amendment 418 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Maintains that proper European maritime spatial planning needs to be systematically implemented,
Amendment 421 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 a (new) 47a. Echoes the complaints voiced by the sector because the reform of the COM in fisheries and aquaculture products has been linked to the process of reforming the CFP, as opposed to what happened with the fisheries control policy, which will probably mean having to wait until 2013 before Community producers have a new framework to help them enhance the profitability of their activity; hopes that the Commission Communication on the future of the current COM will be presented without further delay;
Amendment 422 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 b (new) 47b. Calls, in addition, for the compilation of a study providing a detailed analysis of the general situation concerning the concentration of demand in the fisheries products market, in order to check for the existence of market strategies that might breach competition rules and push down the prices for most species;
Amendment 423 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 c (new) 47c. Asks, at the same time, that in its future recovery and management plans, the Commission analyze the possible impact and repercussions of reducing catches on the European market and the subsequent import of substitutes from third countries to make up for market shortages;
source: PE-430.947
|
| 27 |
2009/2107(INI) A new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture
2010/04/14
PECH
27 amendments...
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the aquaculture sector directly interacts with policy areas which are of prime importance to our society, such as the
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the 2002 Commission communication has proved clearly restrictive and inadequate in encouraging the sector and Member States to give a significant boost to the development of the EU aquaculture sector, while the past decade has seen a substantial growth of the sector worldwide,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the EU is a net importer of fishery and aquaculture products, and the demand for these products is increasing both globally, due to the growing world population, and at Community level due to the past and future accession to the EU of countries in which this trend in demand is even more accentuated, and also because consumption patterns are changing towards foods based on healthier products,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the Community sustainable aquaculture sector can make a major contribution to ensuring high-quality food supplies as regards fish products and thus to reducing the pressure on wild species, as well as playing an important role as regards food security, economic activities and employment, especially in rural and coastal regions,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the EU should therefore give the sustainable aquaculture sector and its development at EU level greater strategic importance, providing it with the necessary financial aid, bearing in mind that the high technology required by aquaculture activities often entails substantial investment by companies, whatever their size,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the considerable research and technological innovation required to ensure the competitiveness and sustainability of aquaculture and enable operators to be successful in the sector is beyond the possibilities of many companies in the sector,
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas, in order to be effective, a sustainable aquaculture policy will need to be structured in such a way as to benefit
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas aquaculture operators in many EU countries
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas, at the same time, many EU countries lack
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas EU products currently face fierce competition from imports from non- EU countries (above all, Turkey, Chile, Vietnam and China), where companies can operate with much lower overheads, as they are not subject to the same legal constraints, the same stringent environmental and plant health legislation, and low wages (social dumping), thereby putting the EU aquaculture sector under further pressure,
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas aquaculture activities have a lower environmental impact than other primary sectors (agriculture and stockbreeding), and aquaculture products are thus more sustainable than agricultural and stockbreeding products; whereas a section of European civil society is also unaware of this fact, which may give rise to unfounded prejudices about these products,
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that, with the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the European Parliament has ceased to be a consultative body in the fisheries sector and has become a co-
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that targeted support for technological and scientific research is an essential prerequisite for the development of a sustainable, modern, efficient, economically viable and environment- friendly aquaculture sector; also points out that research networks, multidisciplinary research groups, technology transfer and coordination between the sector and scientists through technology platforms are essential to ensure a good return on investment in R&D;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers it urgent and essential to lay down rigorous, transparent quality and traceability criteria for EU aquaculture products, to improve fish feedstuffs and
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission to introduce a European eco-labelling programme for fishery and aquaculture products that follows the Community guidelines on eco-labelling; emphasises that eco-labelling not only gives European aquaculture products a competitive advantage, but also brings transparency to a market in which the proliferation of private certifications can confuse consumers;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to set out
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Member States to work towards
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Hopes that the future European Fisheries Fund in support of the reformed CFP will provide for specific budget lines for sustainable aquaculture development and support for investment in that sector, with a particular focus on technologically innovative plants with a lesser environmental impact
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Hopes that this Fund will take into due account the need to provide financial support for
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strive to ensure that Community
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Calls on the Commission to strive to ensure swifter harmonisation of the procedures for the approval of the pharmaceuticals used in aquaculture,
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Reiterates the importance of conducting systematic checks at p
source: PE-439.917
|
| 7 |
2009/2152(INI) Report on the Commission White Paper: 'Adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action'
2010/04/02
PECH
7 amendments...
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that, inter alia, rapid depletion of European fish stocks as a result of fishing practices is eroding the ecological and economic basis of fisheries and is making marine ecosystems more vulnerable to climate change and thus less capable of adapting;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4a (new) Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes that climate change will have potentially severe economic implications for European industrial and small-scale fisheries, which may requir
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Highlights the particular vulnerability of fishing ports and aquaculture installations to rising sea levels, since these infrastructures are located along the edge of the coastline; also highlights their economic and social significance; urges the Commission, therefore, to take specific account of them in adaptation and risk analysis measures and to pay careful attention to the economic costs to these infrastructures of failure to adapt to climate change;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Deplores the fact that mature and well- functioning Integrated Coastal Zone Management involving all relevant levels of government is still rarely put into practice1 and strongly urges the Commission to ensure that the Integrated Coastal Zone Management recommendations2 are updated,
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Urges the Commission to ensure that adequate financing is provided for ecosystem protection
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11a (new) 11a. Stresses that the fishing industry's capacity to adapt to variations in productivity and recruitment in the various fisheries depends on the following factors: - fishing capacity being commensurate with the productive capacity of the resource during its lower productivity phases, - the availability of alternative fishery resources, - investment in flexible technologies such as 'multipurpose' boats and flexible processing chains, - the availability of alternative livelihoods during lean periods1;
source: PE-438.483
|
| 4 |
2009/2238(INI) Arrangements for importing fishery and aquaculture products into the EU with a view to the future reform of the CFP
2010/05/26
PECH
4 amendments...
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Urges the Commission to increase the quantity and quality of impact assessments on all tariff and trade concessions relating to the industry and the EU and ACP markets, in the context of the studies conducted by DG Trade, which currently focus almost entirely on the impact of such measures on beneficiary countries; also stresses that those assessments must provide duly quantified results and take particular account of vulnerable fish species;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Points out, in this respect, that in many cases it is the Community’s own rules on conservation and management that encourage the entry of new fishery and aquaculture products from third countries, which then replace Community fishery products and take over their traditional market niches; calls on the Commission, therefore, when drawing up plans for the recovery and management of species, to take close account, in its calculations and timescales for the recovery of a species, of the risk that a sudden and marked drop in the supply of products of Community origin may jeopardise their future access to markets once a species has recovered;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. The European Union must also enforce those undertakings in order to ensure that all products exported to the European Union, without exception, are from countries that have ratified the main international agreements in the field of maritime law, and in particular the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Convention on Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks and, in cases where the exports are from waters managed by an RFMO, that they are contracting parties to the relevant RFMO agreement;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Emphasises the importance of rigorously applying all aspects of EU law in relation to health standards and inspections (including food safety, traceability and prevention) to fishery and aquaculture imports; urges the Commission, in this respect, to enhance its programme of third country inspections by fine-tuning Food and Veterinary Office missions, primarily by increasing the number of establishments inspected on each mission, in order to obtain results that better reflect the real situation in third countries;
source: PE-441.203
|
| 5 |
2010/2001(BUD) 2011 budget: all sections, first version
2010/07/20
PECH
5 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Rejects forcefully, therefore, the cuts proposed by the Council, since the existing low level of funding for the CFP is such as to render unjustified, even in a context of economic difficulties, cuts such as those proposed, be it for administrative expenditure or for any other type of spending;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission's proposed increase in commitment and payment appropriations for the European Fisheries Fund (EFF);
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that, as in the case of the CFP, the funds proposed for the development of an Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) are not sufficient to cover the most important aspects of the launch of this new policy; calls for specific budget headings to be created for the European Union's new maritime policy, which must be endowed with the appropriations needed for successful development of the IMP
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
source: PE-445.834
|
| 6 |
2010/2040(INI) Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) - Evaluation of progress made and new challenges
2010/06/24
PECH
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists, in particular, that the constraints and specificities of the fisheries and aquaculture sectors be taken into account in the IMP as regards use of the maritime domain,
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Particularly stresses the vital need to carry out multidisciplinary research programmes designed to properly integrate all the activities occurring in the marine environment, based on an ecosystem approach and taking account of the potential impact of such activities on fisheries and aquaculture, as these sectors are extremely dependent on natural resources;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls, also, for
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the wish to see the IMP contribute to the safeguarding of a viable European fisheries sector which respects the environment but is also a source of wealth for its actors
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that funding to implement the IMP must be guaranteed in the Community budget by means of a proportional contribution from all the sectors affected by this policy, taking account of the differences that the EU budget applies to each policy, the balance between the benefits and risks – both environmental and socio-economic – of such activities to society, and the degree of interdependence between coastal areas and the different activities, bearing in mind that the fisheries sector’s dependence on the marine area is unavoidable.
source: PE-443.121
|
| 3 |
2010/2210(INI) Combating illegal fishing at the global level - the role of the EU
2011/06/21
PECH
3 amendments...
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that IUU fishing is one of the most serious threats facing the biodiversity of the world's oceans, and its consequences have incalculable social and economic repercussions not only on fishing businesses and regions but on society as a whole;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Takes the view that the European Union already has instruments with which to discourage illegal fishing and is convinced that, since it is one of the largest markets for fish in the world, the dissuasive effect would have undoubted practical consequences if it uses these instruments properly; calls, therefore, for European Union export certificates not to be granted to or to be withdrawn from those states or contracting parties which do not cooperate with RFMOs in establishing instruments such as catch documentation systems or port state measures;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Stresses that one of the best weapons in the fight against IUU fishing is the trade weapon; once again deplores, therefore, the lack of coordination between DG MARE and DG TRADE, since whilst the former is setting itself more and more objectives in order to combat IUU fishing, the latter's exclusive aim appears to be to make Community markets more and more open to imports, whatever their origin and whatever control guarantees are in place, granting tariff preferences and rules of origin derogations that are serving only to hand European markets over to fleets and countries that have been identified as at least tolerating IUU fishing;
source: PE-467.233
|
| 50 |
2011/0194(COD) Common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products
2012/04/13
PECH
50 amendments...
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) In order to be able to
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 The Common Market Organisation shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives laid down in
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 The Common Market Organisation shall be guided by the principles of good governance
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) da) ‘unwanted catches’, as defined in the Regulation on the Common Fisheries Policy.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) aa) contributing to food supply and employment in coastal and rural areas.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Fishery producer organisations may make use, inter alia, of the following measures to achieve the objectives set out in Article 7:
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a a) planning and managing the fishing activities of their members;
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3 – distributing landed products
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) fa) promoting products, improving quality and conducting studies to improve planning and management.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) da) stabilising the markets;
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Aquaculture producer organisations may make use, inter alia, of the following measures to achieve the objectives referred to in Article 10:
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) ea) promoting products, improving quality and conducting studies to improve planning and management.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) ga) providing training, on quality and traceability in particular, and RDI programmes.
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States may recognise as fishery or aquaculture producer organisations all fishery or aquaculture producer groups which apply for such recognition, on condition that:
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a a) they are sufficiently active economically in their territory or a part thereof, in particular as regards number of members
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Producer organisations recognised under Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 shall be recognised under this Regulation.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 50 to lay down rules which may concern the internal functioning of producer organisations or inter-branch organisations, their rules of association, financial and budgetary provisions, obligations for their members and enforcement of the application of the rules including penalties;
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) ba) the laying down of rules on the frequency, content and practical methods of the checks to be carried out by the Member States in accordance with Article 20 and 21.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 1. Each producer organisation shall submit a production and marketing plan to their competent national authorities to fulfil the objectives laid down in Articles 3, 7 and 10.
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph -1(new) -1. The creation, restructuring and implementation of plans to improve the standards of producer organisations and their associations shall be funded from the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund.
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Each producer organisation may create a collective fund, which shall be used only to finance the following measures:
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Funding for the instruments referred to in the CMO, including the Collective Fund, shall be established under the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, without prejudice to the co-financing rates set.
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a a) minimum marketing sizes taking into account the best available scientific advice and in conformity with conservation reference sizes for fishery products as referred to in Article 15(
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 3. All fishery products landed, including those not complying with marketing standards, may be, under the responsibility of the Member States, distributed
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Fishery and aquaculture products referred to in points (a), (b), (c) and (e) of Annex I which are marketed within the Union, irrespective of their origin, may only be offered for retail to the final consumer where appropriate marking or labelling in
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point d d) for products which are to be sold fresh, the date of
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point e e)
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 2 Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 3 3. The information referred to in paragraph
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Paragraphs 1
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 – introductory part For the purposes of Article 42, paragraph
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point a a) the scientific name for each species
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The indication of the catch or production area in accordance with Article 42, paragraph
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) ea) the date of catch of fishery products referred to in article 42 (1);
Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. No voluntary information shall be included that cannot be verified.
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 2. The delegation of power referred to in Article
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of powers referred to in Article
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 a (new) Article 52a Transitional measures Without prejudice to the provisions of Chapter IV of this Regulation, fishery and aquaculture products, and the packaging thereof, which have been marked or labelled prior to the entry into force of this Regulation may be marketed while stocks remain.
source: PE-487.716
|
| 149 |
2011/0195(COD) Common Fisheries Policy
2012/06/25
PECH
149 amendments...
Amendment 229 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 3 a (new) having regard to the Council Decision adopting the Council's Rules of Procedure1, __________________ 1 Council Decision 2009/937/EU of 1 December 2009 adopting the Council's Rules of Procedure (OJ L 325 of 11.12.2009, p. 35).
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) At the World Summit on Sustainable Development at Johannesburg in 2002, the Union and its Member States
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) An ecosystem based approach to fisheries management needs to be implemented,
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) It is important that the management of the Common Fisheries Policy is guided by principles of good governance. Those principles include decision-making based on best available scientific advice, broad stakeholder involvement and a long-term perspective. The successful management of the Common Fisheries Policy also depends on a clear definition of responsibilities at Union,
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy should take into account interactions with other maritime affairs a
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Measures are needed to reduce, and wherever possible eliminate, the current high levels of unwanted catches and discards. Indeed, unwanted catches and discards constitute a substantial waste and affect negatively the sustainable exploitation of marine biological resources and marine ecosystems as well as the financial viability of fisheries. An obligation to land all catches of managed stocks caught during fishing activities in Union waters
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) For stocks for which no multi-annual plan has been established, exploitation rates
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) M
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) A system of transferable fishing concessions for the majority of managed stocks under the Common Fisheries Policy should be implemented no later than 31 December 2013 for all vessels of 1
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 a (new) (31a) To enable fleet capacity to be aligned as quickly as possible with the fishery resources available, public funding for decommissioning should be provided under the new European Maritime and Fisheries Fund to owners of vessels included in the transferable fishing concession system.
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) Sustainable fisheries agreements concluded with third countries should ensure that Union fishing activities in third country waters are based on the best available scientific advice, ensuring a sustainable exploitation of the marine biological resources. Those agreements
Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) The use of modern and effective technologies should be promoted in the framework of the Union system for control, inspection, and enforcement. Member States or the Commission should have the possibility to conduct pilot projects on new control technologies and data management systems.
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 (50) To ensure the involvement of concerned operators in the Union system for control, inspection, and enforcement, Member States should be able to require the holders of a fishing licence of Union fishing vessels of 1
Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 Amendment 562 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 55 (55) To achieve the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) conservation, management and exploitation of marine biological resources
Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 601 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy shall
Amendment 613 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Common Fisheries Policy shall help ensure a fair standard of living for those who depend on fishing and aquaculture activities, including the processing industries and land-based activities directly linked to fishing activity.
Amendment 614 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. The Common Fisheries Policy shall ensure that the market for fishery and aquaculture products functions in an efficient and transparent manner within the Union, taking into account the interests of both producers and consumers.
Amendment 616 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 2 2. The Common Fisheries Policy shall apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and shall aim to ensure
Amendment 639 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 3 3. The Common Fisheries Policy shall implement the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management to ensure that
Amendment 654 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. A socio-economic impact analysis should be taken into account when formulating measures taken under the Common Fisheries Policy.
Amendment 657 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 4 4. The Common Fisheries Policy shall be consistent and integrate
Amendment 681 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 702 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) provide conditions for efficient fishing activities and promote the development of aquaculture activities in the Union, within an economically viable and competitive fishing industry, in order to contribute to food security and employment;
Amendment 721 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 731 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 751 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 761 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) ensure the survival of small-scale coastal and fishing and of traditional shell fishing activities, owing to their importance in maintaining coastal population levels, generating wealth and preserving sustainable fishing models;
Amendment 773 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new) (fb) progress towards the completion of a single market for fisheries products via a real harmonisation of internal rules and the appropriate alignment of the criteria and requirements established for third country imports with those applicable to EU products;
Amendment 784 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) clear definition of responsibilities at the Union,
Amendment 792 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) establishment of measures in accordance with the best available scientific advice, taking into account the need to adjust these where necessary;
Amendment 801 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) recognition of the specific characteristics of the various areas via a regional approach;
Amendment 815 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 832 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 – ‘Union waters’ means the waters and the seabed under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of the Member States with the exception of the
Amendment 841 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 6 – ‘maximum sustainable yield’ means the
Amendment 859 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 7 – ‘precautionary approach to fisheries management’ means
Amendment 868 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 8 – ‘ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management’ means
Amendment 879 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 9 – ‘fishing mortality rate’ means the
Amendment 882 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 10 – ‘stock’ means a marine biological resource
Amendment 891 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 12 – ‘conservation reference point’ means values
Amendment 896 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 12 a (new) – ‘limit biomass (Blim)’ means the spawning stock biomass level below which the recruitment is expected to be impaired, or the stock dynamics are unknown;
Amendment 898 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 12 b (new) – ‘limit fishing mortality rate (Flim)’ means the fishing mortality rate expected to lead to stock collapse, if maintained in the long-term;
Amendment 899 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 12 c (new) – ‘safe biological limits’, means that, with high probability, the spawning stock biomass estimated for a stock at the end of the preceding year is higher than Blim, and the estimated fishing mortality rate for the same year is lower than Flim;
Amendment 917 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 15 – ‘fishing opportunity’ means a quantified legal entitlement to fish, expressed in terms of catches
Amendment 926 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 17 – ‘transferable fishing concessions’ means revocable user entitlements to a specific part of fishing opportunities allocated to a Member State
Amendment 938 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 19 – ‘fishing capacity’ means a vessel's tonnage in GT (Gross Tonnage) and its power in kW (Kilowatt) as defined in Articles 4 and 5 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2930/8635
Amendment 947 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 20 – ‘aquaculture’ means the rearing or cultivation of aquatic organisms using techniques designed to increase the production of the organisms in question beyond the natural capacity of the environment
Amendment 964 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 27 – ‘end-user of scientific data’ means a
Amendment 973 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 30 – ‘spawning stock biomass’ means an estimate of the mass of the fish of a particular resource that reproduces at a defined time
Amendment 978 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 31 – ‘
Amendment 985 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 – ‘sustainable fisheries agreements’ mean international agreements concluded with another state for the purpose of obtaining access to resources or waters in exchange for financial compensation from the Union
Amendment 990 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 32 a (new) – 'small scale and artisanal fisheries', means the fisheries undertaken by vessels which have an overall length equal to or less than 15 metres, and/or spend less than 24 hours at sea and sell their catch fresh, excluding those fishing with towed gear;
Amendment 1047 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) establishing objectives for the sustainable exploitation of stocks when adopting multiannual plans under Articles 9 - 11;
Amendment 1050 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 1089 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) adopting measures
Amendment 1116 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b)
Amendment 1123 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 1159 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Multiannual plans providing for conservation measures to maintain or restore fish stocks
Amendment 1224 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Measures proposed within the framework of the multiannual plans shall be based on economic wisdom, taking into account the need to gradually introduce relevant changes and avoiding the imposition of unnecessarily short deadlines, except in clearly urgent cases, and should also be acceptable in socioeconomic terms.
Amendment 1234 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Multiannual plans shall contain clear objectives and a calendar for achieving them, and shall provide for periodic operational reviews. The calendar shall be adapted to the biology of the species involved and may provide for amendments, so that the socioeconomic impact of the plan can be reduced once the species has reached biologically safe levels.
Amendment 1244 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Multiannual plans shall provide for adaptations of the fishing mortality rate, resulting in a fishing mortality rate that restores and maintains
Amendment 1267 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 10 – paragraph 2 2. In cases where the determination of a fishing mortality rate that restores and maintains stocks above
Amendment 1298 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii Amendment 1310 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) a socio-economic impact study that includes the various alternatives and timeframes, as well as the possible short- term losses for activities which depend on each fishery;
Amendment 1314 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) technical measures
Amendment 1334 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) quantifiable indicators, including the socio-economic consequences, for periodic monitoring and assessment of the progress related to achieving the targets of the multiannual plan;
Amendment 1345 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point h (h)
Amendment 1365 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) any other
Amendment 1392 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 12 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1402 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 13 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 1414 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 13 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1426 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 14 Amendment 1479 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.
Amendment 1491 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 1506 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 1513 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 1524 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The following fish species shall be excluded from the obligation on landing referred to in paragraph 1: - species captured to be used as live bait; - species whose capture is prohibited by a legislative act adopted in the context of the Common Fisheries Policy; - species which the available scientific information shows to have a high catch survival rate, bearing in mind the nature of the fishing gear, the fishing practices and the circumstances in the fishing area;
Amendment 1537 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 1553 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Catches of fish under the minimum conservation size may not be used for human consumption, unless this is for a charitable purposes, and may only be used to manufacture products such as fish meal and fish oils.
Amendment 1576 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. In the case of EU vessels operating outside EU waters, the rules relating to the obligation to retain on board and land all catches shall be subject to those laid down in this regard by the RFMOs and in the corresponding sustainable fisheries agreements.
Amendment 1588 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 6 Amendment 1595 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 1605 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 1622 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 4 Amendment 1627 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 a (new) Article 16a (new) Regional Fisheries Working Groups 1. In order to decentralise, regionalise and expedite the decision-making process, Regional Fisheries Working Groups whose internal rules are established pursuant to Article 19 of Council Decision 2009/937/EU shall be set up, and shall be able to adopt decisions aimed at fulfilling the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy in the field of the conservation and management of marine biological resources. 2. The number of Regional Fisheries Working Groups shall correspond to the number of Advisory Councils referred to in Articles 52 to 54 and in Annex III to this Regulation. 3. The number of Fisheries Working Groups may increase or decrease in line with any increase or decrease in the number of Advisory Councils. 4. The Regional Fisheries Working Groups shall consist of: a) representatives of Member States who have a genuine interest in those aspects of fishery covered by the remits of those working groups. Notwithstanding the above, any Member State who so wishes may participate in those working groups on a temporary or permanent basis; b) a representative of the Commission, who shall not have voting rights; 5. Each Regional Fisheries Working Group must meet independently, at the proposal of the Commission, or without any such proposal if deemed necessary, whenever a decision needs to be taken on fisheries conservation and management in the area for which it is responsible. The chairman of each Group shall forward the agenda for such meetings to the group members in good time. The Groups’ decisions shall take the form of conclusions. Each Group shall meet on an extraordinary basis at the request of the corresponding Advisory Council when requested to do so. No more than two such meetings may be held in any one year. 6. Before adopting its corresponding conclusions, each Regional Fisheries Working Group must be forwarded a mandatory report, within the set time limit, on the matters to be placed on the agenda of the meeting of the relevant Advisory Council and shall, where possible, take into account the recommendations thereof when adopting those conclusions. Similarly, it must be forwarded any necessary reports of the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Each Regional Fisheries Working Group shall also receive advice from ICES and STECF concerning the annual reports on stocks and management measures for which it is responsible.
Amendment 1628 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 16 b (new) Article 16b (new) General procedure and adoption of decisions 1. In the case of decisions to be adopted pursuant to Article 43.3 TFEU, the corresponding Regional Fisheries Working Group shall adopt its decisions on the basis of the majorities established in Article 238 TFEU, adjusted proportionately to the composition of each Group and the number of weighted votes within it. Decisions thus adopted shall be placed on the agenda of COREPER and the Council as ‘A points’ for adoption as legislative acts. Should COREPER or the Council not adopt the proposal, this shall be referred back to the Regional Fisheries Working Group for consideration and potential revision. 2. In the case of decisions to be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure pursuant to Article 43.2 TFEU, the corresponding Regional Fisheries Working Group shall also be forwarded the requisite opinion of the Economic and Social Committee. Such decisions shall be adopted on the basis of the majorities established in Article 238 TFEU, adjusted proportionately to the composition of each Group and the number of weighted votes within it. Decisions thus adopted shall be placed on the agenda of COREPER and the Council as ‘A points’ for adoption as legislative acts. Should COREPER or the Council not adopt the proposal, this shall be referred back to the Regional Fisheries Working Group for consideration and potential revision. The decision must be adopted by the European Parliament in line with the ordinary legislative procedure.
Amendment 1632 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 17 – title Amendment 1638 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 17 – paragraph 1 1. In a multiannual plan established pursuant to Articles 9, 10 and 11
Amendment 1651 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 17 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.
Amendment 1684 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 18 Amendment 1690 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 19 Amendment 1702 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 20 Amendment 1734 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 21 – title Amendment 1737 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 21 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In a technical measures framework established pursuant to Article 14
Amendment 1750 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 22 Amendment 1754 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 23 Amendment 1761 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 3 – article 24 Amendment 1826 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) all fishing vessels of 1
Amendment 1835 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) all fishing vessels under 1
Amendment 1842 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 2 2. Member States may extend the system of transferable fishing concessions to fishing vessels of less than 1
Amendment 1871 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 1884 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 5 5. Member States may limit the period of validity of transferable fishing concessions
Amendment 1894 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 6 6. Member States may recall transferable fishing concessions
Amendment 1899 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 7 Amendment 1916 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall allocate individual fishing opportunities to holders of transferable fishing concessions, as referred to in Article 28, on the basis of fishing opportunities allocated to the Member States
Amendment 1923 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1929 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 1936 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 4 4. Member States may reserve
Amendment 1942 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 5 5. When allocating transferable fishing concessions in accordance with Article 28 and when allocating fishing opportunities in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, a Member State may provide incentives to fishing vessels, inter alia to those deploying selective fishing gear that eliminates unwanted by-catch within the fishing opportunities assigned to that Member State.
Amendment 1946 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Without prejudice to Article 34 of this Regulation, and for a period of five years, where the Member State allocates transferable fishing concessions in accordance with Article 28, and where it allocates fishing opportunities in accordance with paragraph 1 of this article, the owners of vessels may make use of public funds for decommissioning under Regulation (EU) XXX/XXXX on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, with a view to speeding up the adjustment of fleet capacity.
Amendment 2008 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – Article 32 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Cross-border producer groups could be set up with a view to encouraging the best possible use of each Member State’s fishing opportunities.
Amendment 2022 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 4 – Article 33 a (new) Article 33a Review of the system of transferable fishing concessions Five years after entry into force of this regulation the Commission will assess how well the system of transferable fishing concessions referred to in Articles 27-33 of the regulation is functioning, and, if required, will amend the system as necessary, including by establishing a Community system of transferable fishing concessions.
Amendment 2077 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 5 – Article 35 – paragraph 3 Amendment 2137 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 4 4. Member States, in close cooperation with the Commission, shall coordinate their data collection activities with other Member States in the same region, and make every effort to coordinate their actions with third countries having sovereignty or jurisdiction over waters in the same region.
Amendment 2151 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – Article 38 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall adopt national fisheries scientific data collection, research and innovation programmes. They shall coordinate, in close cooperation with the Commission, their fisheries data collection, research and innovation activities with other Member States and Union research and innovation frameworks
Amendment 2164 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 6 – Article 38 a (new) Article 38a Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries 1. A Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) shall be established. The STECF shall be consulted at regular intervals on matters pertaining to the conservation and management of fresh-water maritime biological resources, including biological, economic, environmental, social and technical considerations. 2. The Commission shall take into account the opinions of the STECF when presenting proposals on fisheries management under this regulation.
Amendment 2166 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – title -1 – Article 38 b (new) Article 38b General Principles 1. The objectives of external fisheries policy shall be as enshrined in Article 39 of the Treaty. Likewise, with a view to ensuring the sustainable exploitation and management of maritime biological resources, the Union shall conduct its international fisheries relations in accordance with its international obligations and the objectives and principles set out in Articles 2 and 4 of this regulation. 2. In particular the Union shall: a) promote and contribute to the development of the best available scientific knowledge; b) promote and support, in all international spheres, the necessary action to eradicate illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. To this end, it shall ensure that no IUU fisheries products enter the EU market; and c) shall encourage and take an active part in joint international efforts to combat piracy at sea, with a view to ensuring the safety of human life and preventing the disruption of maritime fishing activities.
Amendment 2176 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 2 2. The positions of the Union in international organisations dealing with fisheries and RFMOs shall be based on the best available scientific advice to ensure that fishery resources are maintained a
Amendment 2184 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Union shall promote application by the RFMOs of the same principles and standards as are applied in Union waters.
Amendment 2187 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Union shall foster cooperation ties between RFMOs in order to align, harmonise and widen the framework for multilateral action.
Amendment 2193 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 40 – paragraph 1 The Union shall cooperate with third countries and international organisations dealing with fisheries, including RFMOs, to strengthen compliance with measures, and especially those on combating IIU fishing, adopted by such international organisations.
Amendment 2198 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 1 1. Sustainable Fisheries Agreements with third countries shall establish a legal, economic and environmental governance framework for fishing activities carried out by Union fishing vessels in third country waters as well as for third country vessels in Union waters.
Amendment 2204 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. To ensure marine living resources are exploited sustainably, the Union shall be guided by the aim that Sustainable Fisheries Arrangements with third countries shall be established for the mutual benefit of both parties and shall contribute to continuing the activity of EU fleets by obtaining a share of the third country’s surplus that is commensurate with the EU fleets’ interest.
Amendment 2209 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 2 2. Union fishing vessels shall only catch surplus of the allowable catch determined by the third country as referred to in Article 62(2) and (3) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and identified on the basis of the best available scientific advice and relevant information exchanged between the Union and the third country concerned about the total fishing effort on the affected stocks
Amendment 2220 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Private investors in the Union shall be encouraged to invest in third countries by means of joint ventures in order to help foster responsible fishing, economic development and technology transfer, and a framework of legal certainty to safeguard investments by the Union’s private sector shall be promoted.
Amendment 2226 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. A clause shall be included to the effect that Union vessels may only engage in fishing activities in the fishing areas of third countries if they hold a valid fishing authorisation issued by the authorities in said third country. This exclusivity clause shall be included only in the Protocols annexed to the Sustainable Fisheries Agreements.
Amendment 2229 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. In respect of the objectives of the Sustainable Fisheries Agreements, the agreements on reciprocal access shall contain a clause prohibiting discrimination between Union investors and nationals of a third country.
Amendment 2253 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. With a view to promoting sustainability and contributing to food security, growth and employment, non-binding Union strategic guidelines on common priorities and targets for the development of aquaculture activities shall be established by the Commission by 2013. Such strategic guidelines shall take account of the relative starting positions and different circumstances throughout the Union
Amendment 2286 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) assuring the availability of supplies;
Amendment 2294 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (db) ensuring supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices;
Amendment 2299 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d c (new) (dc) The Commission shall ensure that quality and health checks on the products and production of international corporations, including imports, entering the Union’s market are the same as those required of Union producers.
Amendment 2395 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 10 – Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the use of
Amendment 2408 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 10 – Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) the establishment of effective, proportionate
Amendment 2412 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 10 – Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (ea) the cost-benefit ratio and the principle of proportionality.
Amendment 2427 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 10 – Article 48 – paragraph 1 Member States may require holders of a fishing licence for fishing vessels of 1
Amendment 2449 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 11 – Article 51 – paragraph 2 2. Serious infringements by operators of the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy shall result in temporary or permanent bans on access to the Union financial assistance and/or the application of financial reductions. Such measures, implemented by the Member State, shall be proportionate to the nature, extent, duration and repetition of serious infringement
Amendment 2460 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 52 – paragraph 2 Amendment 2473 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) submit recommendations and suggestions on matters relating to
Amendment 2491 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Advisory Councils shall forward a report on the matters to be discussed at meetings of the Regional Fisheries Working Groups, as per the provisions of paragraph 6 of Article 16(a) of this regulation. Advisory Councils shall provide support to and cooperate with Regional Fisheries Working Groups in their work pursuant to Articles 16(a)-22 of this regulation.
Amendment 2502 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 1 1. Advisory Councils shall be composed of: a) organi
Amendment 2515 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The general assembly shall appoint an executive committee composed of up to 30 members. The executive committee shall manage the work of the Advisory Council and adopt its recommendations.
Amendment 2518 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 4 Amendment 2528 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 13 – Article 55 – paragraph 2 2. The delegation of power referred to in Articles
Amendment 2530 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 13 – Article 55 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles
Amendment 2532 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 13 – Article 55 – paragraph 5 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles
source: PE-489.437
|
| 10 |
2011/0294(COD) Trans-European transport network: guidelines
2012/08/10
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 651 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – maritime ports, including those that are strategically important for raw materials and foodstuffs;
source: PE-494.842
2012/08/11
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 991 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 (new) to add the following airports to the core network: - Alicante - Gran Canaria - Málaga - Tenerife Sur - Santiago de Compostela
source: PE-500.436
2012/11/10
TRAN
8 amendments...
Amendment 874 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the port of Vigo to the core network
Amendment 877 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the following sea ports to the comprehensive network: – Marín y Ría de Pontevedra – Vilagarcía de Arousa – Gandía – Alcudía – Guía de Isora – Salinetas – Arinaga
Amendment 878 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the following multimodal platforms to the comprehensive network: – Pontevedra – Zalia – Torrelavega – Júndiz – Monzón – El Vallés – El Prat – El Gorguel – Ciudad Real – Albacete – San Roque – Mérida – Ponferrada/El Bierzo – Castellón – Alicante – Benavente – Zamora – Miranda de Ebro – Burgos – Palencia – Área Central – Aranda de Duero – Soria – Arévalo – Ávila – Segovia
Amendment 881 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the following rail freight transport sections to the comprehensive network: – Almorchón – Córdoba – Ávila – Salamanca – Santander – Oviedo – El Ferrol – León – Zamora – Salamanca – Plasencia – Lleida – Manresa – Barcelona – Los Rosales – Zafra – Madrid – Burgos – Torralba – Soria – Castejón
Amendment 890 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the following multimodal platforms to the core network: – Alcázar de San Juan – León – Antequera – Murcia – Valladolid – Vigo – Zaragoza
Amendment 891 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the following rail passenger transport sections to the core network: – Madrid – Toledo – Madrid – Alcázar – Albacete – Murcia – Almería – Málaga – Algeciras (along the coast) – Avilés – Oviedo – Bilbao – Santander – Oviedo – El Ferrol – A Coruña – Castejón – Logroño – Miranda – Mora – Alcázar – Linares – Moreda/Jaén/Córdoba – Ourense – Vigo (via Cercedo) – Ourense – Monforte – Lugo – A Coruña – Palencia – Santander – Segovia – Ávila – Sevilla – Cádiz – Sevilla – Huelva – Portuguese border – Valencia – Alicante (along the coast) – Motilla – Albacete – La Encina – Santiago – Vigo – Portuguese border – Granada – Motril – Antequera – Málaga – Madrid – Ávila – Salamanca – León – Monforte – Torralba – Soria – Castejón – Plasencia – León – Gijón
Amendment 894 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the following high-quality road sections to the comprehensive network: – Valladolid – Aranda de Duero – Soria – Ourense – Santiago – Ourense – Guntín – Ponferrada – Ourense – Monforte – Chantada – Astorga – León – Burgos – Burgos – Logroño – Pamplona – Ávila – Salamanca – León – Valladolid – Segovia – Valladolid – Ávila – Maqueda – Toledo – Ocaña – Tarancón – Cuenca – Teruel – Alfajarín – Fraga -Catalayud – Daroca – Alcolea del Pinar – Monreal del Campo – Badajoz – Zafra – Córdoba – Baena – Granada – Huelva – Jabugo – Zafra – Estepa – Lucena – Baena – Jaén – Úbeda – Blanca – Avarán – La Font de la Figuera – Alicante – Alcoy – Játiva – Elche – Cartagena – Vera – Figueras – Puigcerdá – Ávila – Villacastín – San Rafael – Segovia
Amendment 968 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 2 add Cagliari (IT), Heraklion (EL) Santander (ES), Vigo (ES) and Santa Cruz de Tenerife.
source: PE-496.673
|
| 1 |
2011/0302(COD) Mécanisme pour l'interconnexion en Europe
2012/10/17
TRAN, ITRE
1 amendments...
Amendment 703 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point b – row 10 source: PE-497.891
|
| 136 |
2011/0380(COD) European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) 2014-2020
2013/01/17
PECH
136 amendments...
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) It is paramount to better integrate environmental concerns into the CFP which should deliver on the objectives and targets of the Union's environmental policy and the Europe 2020 Strategy. The CFP is aimed at an exploitation of living marine biological resources that restores and maintains fish stocks at levels not less than those which can produce the maximum sustainable yield, not later than 2015 where possible and by 2020 at the very latest for all stocks. The CFP shall implement the precautionary and eco-
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 a (new) (38 a) In line with the objective of creating jobs included in the Europe 2020 strategy, the EMFF must also provide resources for facilitating the adoption of measures for creating and improving employment levels throughout the whole fishing industry, from catching and aquaculture to processing and marketing.
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) The objective of the Common Fisheries Policy is to ensure a sustainable exploitation of fish stocks. Overcapacity has been identified as a major driver for overfishing. It is therefore paramount to adapt the Union fishing fleet to the resources available.
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) In line with the gradual discard ban
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 (44) Conscious of the importance of fishing ports, landing sites
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 55 (55)
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 56 (56) In fisheries areas, community-led local development should encourage innovative approaches to create growth and jobs, in particular by adding value to fisheries products and diversifying the local economy also towards new economic activities, including those offered by "blue growth" and the broader maritime sectors.
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 61 (61) In order to ensure the viability of fisheries and aquaculture in a highly competitive market, it is necessary to lay down provisions granting support for the implementation of the [Regulation (EU) No on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products]1 as well as for marketing and processing activities carried by operators to maximise the value of fisheries and aquaculture products. Particular attention should be paid to the promotion of operations which integrate producing, processing and marketing activities of the supply chain. In order to adapt to the new
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Priority should be given to producer organisations and associations of producer organisations by granting them support
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 a (new) (81 a) In order to remain in line with the other funds, the EMFF must always be restricted to actions or measures directly related to activities in the fishing sector.
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 93 (93) The rules and procedures governing commitments and payments should be simplified so that a regular cash flow is ensured. A pre-financing of
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 101 (101) In order to supplement and amend certain non-essential elements of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of a code of conduct on identification of the cases of non- compliance of CFP rules which could lead to inadmissibility of application and the timeframe of application, in order to ensure ex ante conditionality in a proportionate way,
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 5 (5) 'fisheries area' means an area with sea, river or lake shore or including ponds or a river estuary with a significant level of employment in fisheries or aquaculture and designated as such by the Member State;
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 6 a (new) (6a) ‘operator in the fisheries sector’ means a natural or legal person operating, owning a business or working either as a self-employed person or for a business, in relation to an activity linked to any of the stages in the production chain for fisheries products;
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 18 (18) 'small scale coastal fishing' means fishing carried out by fishing vessels of an overall length of less than 12 metres and not using towed gear as listed in Table 3 Annex I of Commission Regulation (EC) No 26/2004 of 30 December 2003 regarding the fishing vessels register of the Union and/or which spend less than 24 hours at sea;
Amendment 536 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 - point a (a) promoting
Amendment 541 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) fostering
Amendment 559 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) fostering the development and implementation of the Union's Integrated Maritime Policy in a manner that complements cohesion policy and to the Common Fisheries Policy;
Amendment 565 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The achievement of the objectives of the EMFF shall contribute to the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. It shall be pursued through the following six Union priorities, which translate the relevant Thematic Objectives of the Common Strategic Framework (hereinafter CSF):
Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b (b) diversification of
Amendment 602 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part (2) Fostering innovative, competitive and knowledge based fisheries, aquaculture and processing through the focus on the following areas:
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b (b) enhancement of the competitiveness and viability of fisheries, in particular of small scale coastal fleet, aquaculture and the processing industry, and improvement of safety or working conditions;
Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d (d) improved market organisation for fishery and aquaculture products.
Amendment 635 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Amendment 654 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – introductory part (4) Promoting a sustainable and resource efficient fisheries, aquaculture and processing industry through the focus on the following areas:
Amendment 660 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a (a) reduction of the impact of fisheries and aquaculture on the marine environment;
Amendment 676 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new) (ba) enhancement of ecosystems related to aquaculture and promotion of efficient aquaculture that gives due consideration to animal health and wellbeing, and public health.
Amendment 680 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Amendment 706 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to paragraph 2 of this Article, Articles 107, 108 and 109 of the Treaty shall apply to aid granted by the Member States to enterprises in fisheries
Amendment 712 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 In addition to the principles enounced in Article 4 of the [Regulation (EU) No […] laying down Common Provisions], the Commission and the Member States shall ensure coordination and complementarity between support from the EMFF and from other Union policies and financial instruments, including the
Amendment 767 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) construction of new fishing vessels,
Amendment 786 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) decommissioning of fishing vessels and temporary cessation of fishing activities, except in the cases provided for in this Regulation;
Amendment 809 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. EUR 4 535 000 000 of the resources referred to in paragraph (1) shall be allocated to the sustainable development of fisheries, aquaculture and fisheries areas under Chapters I, II, III and I
Amendment 838 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 6 6. EUR
Amendment 849 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a – point -i (new) (i) size of the fishing fleet;
Amendment 852 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) the level of employment in fisheries
Amendment 856 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) the level of production in fisheries
Amendment 883 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) where applicable, consistency of the measures under Union priorities for EMFF referred to in Article 6(
Amendment 887 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 890 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point b – paragraph 2 The analysis shall be structured around the Union priorities as laid out in Article 6. Specific needs concerning the mitigation of climate change
Amendment 898 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) a
Amendment 902 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) description of the methodology used to draw up the selection criteria for projects;
Amendment 908 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) description of the methodology used to draft the selection criteria for local development strategies under Chapter III of Title V ;
Amendment 909 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point h h) a clear indication of the
Amendment 913 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point j – point ii ii) a table setting out the applicable EMFF resources and co-financing rate for the
Amendment 915 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point k k) information on the complementarity with measures financed through other CSF Funds
Amendment 920 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point m (m) the procedure of designation of the partners referred to in Article 5 of the [Regulation (EU) No [...] laying down Common Provisions] and the results of the consultation of the partners;
Amendment 974 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 1. To implement Chapters I and II of Title VI and Article 9
Amendment 977 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. The multiannual operational programme and the annual work programmes shall set out the objectives pursued, the expected results, the method of implementation and its total amount. It shall also contain a description of the activities to be financed, an indication of the amount allocated to each activity, an indicative implementation timetable, as well as information on their implementation. It shall include for grants the priorities, the essential evaluation criteria and the maximum rate of co- financing.
Amendment 982 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 1. The owner of a fishing vessel having received support under Articles 32(1)(b), 36, 39
Amendment 986 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 1. In order to stimulate innovation in fisheries, including aquaculture and the processing industry, the EMFF may support projects aiming at developing or introducing techniques or new or substantially improved products compared to the state of art, new or improved processes, new or improved management and organisation systems.
Amendment 1018 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 2. The feasibility studies and advice referred to respectively in paragraph 1(a) and (b) shall be provided by recognised scientific or technical bodies or private companies with the required advisory competences as recognised by the national law of each Member State.
Amendment 1026 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 5 5. The support referred to in paragraph 1 shall take the form of lump sums not exceeding the amount of
Amendment 1034 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) to the creation of partnership agreements or contracts, or associations between one or several independent scientific bodies and fishermen or one or several organisations of fishermen.
Amendment 1035 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 2. Activities referred to in paragraph 1(b) and (ba), and may cover data collection activities, studies, dissemination of knowledge and best practices.
Amendment 1049 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) lifelong learning, dissemination of scientific knowledge and innovative practices, and acquisition of new professional skills in particular linked to safety, the sustainable management of marine ecosystems, activities in the maritime sector, innovation and entrepreneurship;
Amendment 1064 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 2 2. The support referred to in paragraph 1 shall also be granted to spouses of self- employed fishermen, to self-employed operators in the catching sector or, when and in so far as recognised by national law, the life partners of self-employed fishermen, not being employees or business partners, where they habitually, under the conditions laid down by national law, participate in the activities of the self- employed fishermen, the operators in the fish catching sector or perform ancillary tasks.
Amendment 1074 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In order to facilitate diversification and job creation also outside fishing, the EMFF may support:
Amendment 1089 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) business start-ups including outside fishing;
Amendment 1098 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point b b) the retrofitting of fishing vessels, particularly those engaged in small
Amendment 1123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 3 3. Support under paragraph 1(b) shall be granted to
Amendment 1147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 6 6. The amount of financial assistance granted under paragraph 1 (a) shall not exceed 50% of the budget foreseen in the business plan for each operation and shall not exceed a maximum amount of
Amendment 1163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 1. In order to improve working conditions on board for fishermen in relation to health and safety, the EMFF may support investments on board or in individual equipments providing that these investments go beyond standards required under national or Union law.
Amendment 1179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 3 3. When the operation consists in an investment on board, the support shall not be granted, for each type of investment, more than once during the programming period for the same fishing vessel. When the operation consists of an investment in individual equipment, the support shall not be granted, for each type of investment, more than once during the programming period for the same beneficiary.
Amendment 1184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 1189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 a (new) Article 33a Temporary cessation of fishing activities 1. The EMFF may contribute to financing measures for the temporary cessation of fishing activities: a) in the case of the emergency measures provided for in Article 13 of Regulation xxxx/xxx (Regulation on the Common Fisheries Policy) being implemented; b) in the case of a non-renewal of a fishing partnership agreement or protocol; c) in the case of temporary cessation of activity as a consequence of the establishment of a multiannual plan adopted within the framework of Articles 9 to 11 of Regulation xxxx/xxx (Regulation on the Common Fisheries Policy), all within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006. 2. The EMFF may contribute to financing the measures referred to in paragraph 1 for affected fishermen and owners of fishing vessels, for a maximum period of 6 months per vessel throughout the programme periods. 3. The support provided for in paragraph 1 shall be granted to: a) the owners of fishing vessels included in the EU Fleet Register who have engaged in fishing activities for at least 120 days preceding the submission of the application for support, and b) crew members who have worked on board a fishing vessel affected by temporary cessation of activities in the conditions referred to in (a) of this paragraph. 4. During the period or periods when the support referred to in paragraph 1 is being received, the fishing vessel and the crew members affected shall not engage in any fishing activity. The competent authority shall ensure that activity has effectively ceased.
Amendment 1195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 b (new) Amendment 1198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 c (new) Article 33c Measures in cases of exceptional events 1.- To alleviate the socio-economic consequences of an exceptional event, such as a natural disaster or large-scale pollution of the marine environment, which hinder the normal development of fishing activities, the EMFF may grant support for the temporary cessation of fishing activities to the owners of the fishing vessels and crews. 2.- No event arising from measures connected with the conservation of resources shall be considered to be exceptional.
Amendment 1271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In order to reduce the impact of fishing on the marine environment, foster the elimination of discards and facilitate the transition to exploitation of living marine biological resources that restores and maintains populations of harvested species a
Amendment 1294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 1. In order to contribute to the elimination of discards and by-catches and facilitate the transition to exploitation of living marine biological resources that restores and maintains populations of harvested species a
Amendment 1346 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) measures for the management, restoration and monitoring NATURA 2000 sites in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora
Amendment 1350 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) management, restoration and monitoring of marine protected areas in view of the implementation of the spatial protection measures related to fishing activity referred to in Article 13(4) of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2008/56/EC;
Amendment 1368 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1393 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 1401 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. The support referred to in paragraphs 1 a) and 2 may only be granted for the replacement of main or ancillary engines which have been officially certified in accordance with that laid down in Article 40(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009.
Amendment 1403 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. The support referred to in paragraph 1a) shall only be granted to owners of fishing vessels and not more than once during the programming period for the same fishing vessel.
Amendment 1406 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1435 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 3 3. Support under this Article shall not be granted more than once for each type of investment during the programming period for the same fishing vessel or the same beneficiary.
Amendment 1452 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 1. For the purpose of increasing the quality of the product landed, increasing energy efficiency, contributing to environmental protection or improving safety and working conditions, optimising the supply of fuel, water, ice and electricity, optimising the storage and auction of fishing products and carrying out computerised management of fishing activities, the EMFF may support investments improving fishing port infrastructure or landing sites, including investments in facilities for waste and marine litter collection.
Amendment 1472 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 4 4. Support shall not cover the construction of new ports
Amendment 1544 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point a a) continuing to develop and introducing new technical or organisational knowledge in aquaculture farms, in particular which reduces their impact on the environment or fosters a more sustainable use of resources in aquaculture;
Amendment 1633 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) e a) the promotion of equal opportunities, especially with regard to gender equality and the integration of disabled people;
Amendment 1638 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new) e b) the improvement of working conditions, including reconciling work with family life.
Amendment 1643 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 3 3. Support under paragraph (1)(a) shall only be granted to public law bodies selected to set up the farm advisory services. Support under paragraph (1)(b) shall only be granted to aquaculture SMEs or aquaculture producer's organisations or associations.
Amendment 1663 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1745 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) forms of
Amendment 1753 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. The EMFF shall support compensation to mollusc and mussel farmers for the temporary suspension of harvesting of farmed molluscs exclusively for reasons of public health.
Amendment 1764 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the loss, resulting from the suspension of the harvest, amounts to more than
Amendment 1773 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) ca) the establishment and operation of health protection groups in the aquaculture sector.
Amendment 1784 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) natural disasters or extensive pollution of the marine environment;
Amendment 1786 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) sudden water quality changes for which the company is not responsible;
Amendment 1789 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) diseases in aquaculture or destruction of production facilities for which the company is not responsible.
Amendment 1795 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) da) costs arising from the collection and destruction of dead animals on the farm and for which the company is not responsible, in particular those due to natural causes, farm accidents, or slaughter and burial on the farm, on the grounds of animal health and prior official authorisation.
Amendment 1802 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The occurrence of an adverse climatic event
Amendment 1819 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 1 Financial support under this Chapter shall contribute to the achievement of the Union priorities identified in Article 6(1)(2) and (4).
Amendment 1824 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. A fisheries area eligible for support shall be
Amendment 1826 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 1828 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 1831 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of the EMFF, the integrated local development strategy referred to in Article 28(1)(c) of [Regulation (EU) No […] laying down Common Provisions] shall be based on the interaction between actors and projects of
Amendment 1841 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 3 3. The strategy must be coherent with the opportunities and needs identified in the area and the Union priorities for the EMFF. Strategies
Amendment 1855 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) ensure a
Amendment 1862 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) adding value, creating jobs, and promoting innovation at all stages of the fisheries
Amendment 1865 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) supporting diversification and job creation in fisheries areas, in
Amendment 1877 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 2 2. The support given may include measures provided for Chapters I, II and I
Amendment 1890 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 68 – paragraph 1 Support under this Chapter shall contribute to achieve the
Amendment 1926 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 1 – point c – introductory part (c) the financial assistance per year shall not exceed
Amendment 1934 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 2 Amendment 1956 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) fisheries and aquaculture products obtained using methods with low impact on the environment or organic aquaculture products as defined in Council Regulation(EC) No 834/2007 on organic production.
Amendment 1968 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii (iii) direct marketing of fishery products by small scale coastal fishermen and shellfish gatherers;
Amendment 1990 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 71 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) the search for new markets and support for placing on the market and promoting local and seasonal products.
Amendment 2008 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) c a) for improving or developing new products or processes and processing techniques, or new management and organisational systems, including improvements in working conditions, hygiene and public health standards and product quality;
Amendment 2042 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 72 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The EMFF may grant aid to companies, associations and technology centres representing the processing sector for the development of research and innovation activities related to the activities referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 2074 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 78 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) development, purchase and installation of the components necessary to ensure data transmission from actors involved in fishing and the marketing of fishery products to the relevant Member State and EU authorities, including the necessary components for electronic recording and reporting systems (ERS), vessel monitoring systems (VMS), and automatic identification systems (AIS) used for control purposes;
Amendment 2077 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 78 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) development, purchase and installation of the components necessary to ensure traceability of fishery and aquaculture products, as defined in Art. 58 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009;
Amendment 2082 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 78 – paragraph 2 – point g (g) development of new systems and implementation of pilot projects related to fisheries control, including fish DNA analysis or the development of web-sites related to control;
Amendment 2101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 79 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the collection, management and use of data for the purpose of scientific analysis and CFP implementation;
Amendment 2209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 94 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) 50 % of the eligible public expenditure for the support referred to in Article 39(2) and 78(2)(e);
Amendment 2210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 94 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (ca) 75 % of public expenditure eligible for aid provided for in Articles 33(a), 33(b) and 33(c) .
Amendment 2220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 1 1. Member States
Amendment 2223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States
Amendment 2227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) the operation is related to the measures provided for in Articles 33(a), 33(b) and 33(c);
Amendment 2235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 95 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may apply an intensity of public aid between 50 % and maximum100 % of the total eligible expenditure when the operation is implemented under Chapter
Amendment 2245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 96 – paragraph 1 1. In addition to the general rules of Article 72 of [Regulation (EU) No [...] laying down Common Provisions], and following the Commission decision approving the operational programme, an initial pre-
Amendment 2254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 98 – paragraph 4 4. If one of the requirements laid down in paragraph 3 is not met, the Commission shall
Amendment 2275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 102 – paragraph 3 3
Amendment 2286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 105 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall exercise the empowerment in full respect of the principle of proportionality and taking into account the risk that the non-compliance with the respective CFP rules constitutes a serious threats to the sustainable exploitation of living marine biological resources that restores and maintains populations of harvested species a
Amendment 2308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) providing the Commission, on a
Amendment 2323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 109 – paragraph 1 1. The paying agency shall be a dedicated department or body of the Member States responsible for the management and control of expenditure. With the exception of payment, the execution of those tasks may be delegated to intermediary paying agencies.
Amendment 2417 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 143 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The
Amendment 2432 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 147 – paragraph 1 1. If the Commission considers that Union funds have not been used in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Regulation
Amendment 2433 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 150 – paragraph 2 2. The delegation of power referred to in the Articles 12, 3
Amendment 2434 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 150 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 12, 3
Amendment 2435 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 150 – paragraph 5 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 12, 3
source: PE-496.422
|
| 3 |
2011/2107(INI) Green Paper: From challenges to opportunities: towards a common strategic framework for EU research and innovation funding
2011/06/22
PECH
3 amendments...
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers it vital that one of the Green Paper's objectives should be achieved, i.e. the future EU budget must focus on instruments with 'added value' and become 'more results-driven'; takes the view that, even though excellence is a fundamental criterion in science, there are some sectors such as fisheries in which applied research is unavoidable in order to define and apply management measures; points out that the objectives of the new CFP, based on the ecosystem approach and maximum sustainable yield, require multidisciplinary and on-the-spot knowledge and assessments which make it possible to draw speedy conclusions on which innumerable business decisions, jobs and marine ecosystem measures depend;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Hopes, in this context, that the Green Paper will mark a change in current scientific policy in relation to fisheries, since the pure pursuit of excellence in this sector has resulted in the abandonment of key chapters such as knowledge of species and their behaviour from the perspective of their utilisation by fleets and their relationship with management measures, and has led many scientists to move away from applied fisheries research and young researchers to reject this field, causing serious shortages of specialised staff at a time when they were most needed, given the state of stocks;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the fact that the Green Paper stresses the need for research that will improve innovation capacity and competitiveness, which, in coordination with the measures envisaged in the EFF, may open up new possibilities for fishing businesses to invest in the development of new, more sustainable fishing techniques, such as new gear, vessels which are less polluting, safer and more comfortable, and measures designed to upgrade the use and value of fish products;
source: PE-467.183
|
| 12 |
2011/2291(INI) Reporting obligations under Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the CFP
2012/03/29
PECH
12 amendments...
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to provide for the establishment of long-term management plans for all EU fisheries; highlights the possibility of grouping fisheries according to geographical fishing regions whereby the specificities of the different European seas should be taken into account a
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Believes that as part of the objective of guaranteeing sustainability, the policies considered should be aimed at the future of the fishing sector and, consequently, at facilitating the entry of new generations of fishermen;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission in the future to use the ecosystem approach as a basis for all long-term management plans (LTMPs)
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the direct link between discards, unwanted by-catch and overfishing, and the need to develop an efficient no-discards policy at EU level whereby the Community Fisheries Control Agency (CFCA) should have greater powers to ensure a fair system of rules and sanctions, i.e. the principle of equal treatment; argues that a discard ban should take a realistic approach and therefore be gradual, form part of the different management plans and be fishery-based and not relate to different fish stocks; stresses that selective
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Urges the Commission to address immediately the issue of the lack of reliable and available data necessary for sound scientific advice;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to establish a definition of overcapacity at EU level accommodating regional definitions, where local specificities are taken into account; further calls on the Commission to redefine fishing capacity in such a way that both the vessel’s fishing capacity and its actual fishing effort are taken as a basis; stresses moreover the necessity to define small- scale fisheries in order to
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Underlines that the TFC system cannot be considered as the only measure to tackle overfishing and overcapacity but that it should be available as one of the various
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Underlines th
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Emphasises the need
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Believes that, for the time being, the special access regime for small-scale fisheries in the 12 nautical mile zone should be retained;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Believes that
source: PE-485.898
|
| 16 |
2011/2292(INI) Small scale and artisanal fisheries and the CFP reform
2012/08/05
PECH
16 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A (new) A. whereas
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas management models based on transferable fishing rights or concessions could comprise real risks for the subsistence of certain sectors of inshore and artisanal fishing
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the economic and social crisis i
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas its structural weaknesses mean small-scale fishing is more exposed to certain types of e
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Proposes that, without prejudice to the provisions of the new CFP framework regulation, artisanal fishing should be defined as fishing that involves vessels, excluding those that fish with beam trawls, which: (a) have a total length equal to or less than 15 metres, and/or (b) spend less than 24 hours at sea and sell their catch fresh;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Draws attention to the importance of taking into account, not only the quantity of the fleet, but also its
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – introductory part 11. C
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 1 –
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses that the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products (COM) should
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
source: PE-487.773
|
| 32 |
2011/2318(INI) External dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy
2012/08/05
PECH
32 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Motion forf a resolution Citation 14 bis (new) - having regard to its Resolution of 14 December 2011 on the future Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco1 __________________ 1 Texts adopted: P7_TA(2011)0573.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas quotas in RFMOs
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the EU
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication and the many positive proposals it includes for encouraging the sustainability of the EU’s overall fishing activities outside EU waters
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that fishing by EU interests inside and outside Union waters should be based upon the same standards in terms of ecological and social sustainability and transparency, and that these same principles must be defended and required of third countries, both within the framework of the RFMOs and at bilateral level;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that the IPOA-Capacity (International Plan of Action for the Management of Fishing Capacity) committed the EU, no later than 2005, to develop and implement a system for the management of fishing capacity; notes, th
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to support clearly defined principles and objectives for environmentally and socio-economically sustainable fisheries on the high seas and in waters under national jurisdiction at
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 bis (new) 9a. Calls for the Commission to be more vigorous in applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 on IUU fishing, particularly in relation to the contracting parties of the RFMOs that do not actively collaborate in establishing and applying the principle mechanisms of the campaign against IUU fishing;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that bilateral fisheries agreements, or Sustainable Fisheries Agreements (SFA) as the Commission proposes to call them, negotiated between partners and equitably implemented, should be of benefit to both parties, providing economic resources, technical and scientific expertise and support for improved fisheries management and good governance to the third country, while allowing the continuation of fishing activities by EU vessels that provide a
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the intention of the Commission to include several provisions in future bilateral agreements, including respect for the principle of limiting access to resources that are scientifically demonstrated to be surplus to the coastal State’s own catch capacity, in line with Article 61 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, a human rights clause and
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Considers that the currently used social clause should be strengthened to include respect for
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Encourages the Commission
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Fully supports the concept of decoupling financial compensation for access to fisheries resources from sectoral support for development
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 bis (new) 20a. Insists that the financial item intended to provide sectoral support must be more effective and achieve increased, improved quality results, in particular by focusing on scientific research, data collection and the monitoring and management of fishing activities.
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 bis (new) 23a. Also emphasises the need to improve transparency both during the negotiation and the lifetime of the Fisheries Agreements, both on behalf of the EU and third countries;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Believes that there should be a regional approach to the negotiation and implementation of the EU’s bilateral agreements, largely in those concerning the tuna boat fleet, and, where appropriate, a clear link between the terms they contain and the management measures and performance of the relevant RFMOs;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 bis (new) 25a. Must express its unease to the Commission, at regional level, regarding the clear reversal in the measures concerning the boarding of sailors, who in the majority of cases are reverting to the unsustainable policy of being contracted according to nationality, rather than by origin, in ACP countries in general.
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Believes that RFMOs must develop sustainable management systems that provide for a
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Requests that a detailed assessment be conducted of the fishing capacity of EU fleets authorised to fish outside EU waters, using reliable indicators of the ability of vessels to catch fish and considering advances in technology based on the recommendations of the 1999 FAO Technical Consultation on the measurement of fishing capacity
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33.
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 37 37.
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38.
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 – indent 2 –
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 – indent 3 bis (new) – Require compliance with hygiene and sanitation legislation on the same terms as those required of European industry,
source: PE-489.341
|
| 1 |
2012/0158(COD) Conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms; herring for industrial purposes
2012/09/25
PECH
1 amendments...
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Regulation (EC) No 850/98 Article 34 – point 11 a (new) 11a. The Commission may decide, after consultation of the STECF, to exclude certain fisheries in ICES zones VIII, IX and X from application of points 9.1 to 9.11, where information provided by Member States shows that those fisheries result in a very low level of shark by- catches and of discards.
source: PE-496.424
|
| 4 |
2012/0162(COD) Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing: alignment of the Regulation with the TFEU (Commission delegated and implementing powers)
2013/03/06
PECH
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 – indent 10 Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 – indent 11 Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 Article 33 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 Article 34 – paragraph 1 1. The
source: PE-506.201
|
| 1 |
2012/0201(COD) Fishery resources: recovery of the European eel stock; aligning the Regulation with the TFEU (Commission delegated and implementing powers)
2013/04/30
PECH
1 amendments...
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 Regulation (EC) nº 1100/2007 Article 12a – paragraph 2 2. The delegation of powers referred to in Article7(6) shall be conferred for a
source: PE-510.585
|
| 5 |
2012/2261(INI) Strategy for fisheries in the Adriatic and Ionian Seas
2013/04/16
PECH
5 amendments...
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges the
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Regrets that the Member States have not made greater use of these individual management plans, which allow certain general rules to be suspended so that specific characteristics can be taken into account; considers that this would have considerably facilitated local management and would have provided valuable data on the situation in the different zones, making it possible to introduce appropriate changes; therefore asks the coastal Member States to constructively collaborate with each other and the Commission on updating and continuously adapting fisheries management measures;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to establish an ongoing dialogue with the non-EU countries of the Adriatic-Ionian sea basin, with a view to concluding bilateral or multilateral agreements
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
source: PE-508.018
|
Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
Term 6 20.07.2004 - 13.07.2009
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |