Bogusław LIBERADZKI
Constituencies
-
Poland
Sojusz Lewicy Demokratycznej
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
Poland
Sojusz Lewicy Demokratycznej - Unia Pracy
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Poland
Sojusz Lewicy Demokratycznej - Unia Pracy
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
Poland
Sojusz Lewicy Demokratycznej
2004/05/01 - 2004/07/19
-
Poland
Sojusz Lewicy Demokratycznej
2004/05/01 - 2004/07/19
Groups
-
S&D
Member
Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
-
PSE
Member
Socialist Group in the European Parliament
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
PSE
Member
Group of the Party of European Socialists
2004/05/01 - 2004/07/19
-
PSE
Observer
Group of the Party of European Socialists
2003/04/23 - 2004/04/30
-
PSE
Member
Group of the Party of European Socialists
2004/05/01 - 2004/07/19
-
PSE
Member
Socialist Group in the European Parliament
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
EP staff
- Quaestor of European Parliament 2012/01/18 - 9999/12/31
- Member of Quaestors 2012/01/18 - 9999/12/31
- Member of Parliament's Bureau 2012/01/18 - 9999/12/31
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vice-Chair of | Committee on Budgetary Control | 2012/01/23 | 9999/12/31 |
| Member of | Committee on Transport and Tourism | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Japan | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2004/09/15 | 2007/03/13 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee | 2004/09/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2004/09/15 | 2007/03/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://www.liberadzki.pl/
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45423
- Fax
- +322 28 49423
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 12G305
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75423
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79423
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T12023
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Parlament Europejski
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 12G305
- B-1047 Bruksela
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2013/0028(COD) | Opening of the market for domestic passenger transport services by rail: award of public service contracts. 4th Railway Package |
| Opinion | 2013/0014(COD) | European Union Agency for Railways. 4th Railway Package |
| Shadow | 2012/2298(INI) | Promoting a European transport-technology strategy for Europe's future sustainable mobility |
| Responsible | 2012/2086(DEC) | Special report 4/2012 (2011 discharge): Using Structural and Cohesion Funds to co-finance transport infrastructures in seaports: an effective investment? |
| Responsible | 2011/2202(DEC) | 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section I - European Parliament |
| Opinion | 2011/2020(BUD) | 2012 budget: all sections |
| Opinion | 2010/2001(BUD) | 2011 budget: all sections, first version |
| Responsible | 2009/2068(DEC) | 2008 discharge: EU general budget, section III, Commission |
| Responsible | 2008/2109(DEC) | 2007 discharge: 7th, 8th and 9th European Development Funds EDF |
| Shadow | 2008/0247(COD) | Rail transport: European rail network for competitive freight |
| Responsible | 2007/0184(COD) | Transport of dangerous goods by road: uniform procedures for checks (amend. Directive 95/50/EC, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission) |
| Responsible | 2007/0178(CNS) | Export refunds: monitoring carried out at the time of export of agricultural products receiving refunds or other amounts (amend. Regulation (EEC) No 386/90). |
| Responsible | 2006/0278(COD) | Inland transport of dangerous goods (repeal. Directives 94/55/EC, 96/49/EC, 96/35/EC and 2000/18/EC and Decisions 2005/263/EC and 2005/180/EC) |
| Opinion | 2005/2001(BUD) | 2006 budget: Section III, Commission |
| Opinion | 2005/0282(COD) | Motor vehicles: type approval with respect to emissions and on access to repair information (amend. Directives 72/306/EEC and 2005/55/EC: repeal. Directives 70/220/EEC, 72/306/EEC, 74/290/EEC, 77/102/EEC, 78/665/EEC, 80/1268/EEC, 83/351/EEC, 88/76/EEC, 88/436/EEC, 89/458/EEC, 91/441/EEC, 93/59/EEC, 93/116/EC, 94/12/EC, 96/44/EC, 96/69/EC, 98/69/EC, 98/77/EC, 1999/100/EC, 1999/102/EC, 2001/1/EC, 2001/100/EC, 2002/80/EC, 2003/76/EC and 2004/3/EC) |
Born
1948/09/12 Sochaczew- Master's in economics (1970). Doctorate in economics (1975). Postdoctoral qualification (dr. hab.) (1981). Associate professor (1999). Professor (2003).
- Warsaw School of Economics (SGGW): professor, head of department (since 1971). Visiting Professor, Fulbright Scholar USA, University of Illinois (1986-1987). Director of the Transport Economics Research Institute, Warsaw (1986-1989). Deputy Minister of Transport and Maritime Affairs (1989-1993). Minister of Transport and Maritime Affairs (1993-1997). Member of the Sejm (1997-2004). Member of the European Parliament (since 2004).
- Member of the Provincial Council and the National Council of the Democratic Left Alliance (SLD) party (1999-2008). Member of the SLD Provincial Council for Zachodniopomorskie (since 2008).
- UN Inland Transport Committee. Chairman of the Principal Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics, Polish representative on the committee (1987-1993).
- Polish Academy of Sciences - member of the Transport Committee.
- Gold and Silver Cross of Merit. Medal of the National Education Committee. Transport-sector awards.
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 5 |
2008/0247(COD) Rail transport: European rail network for competitive freight
2010/04/15
TRAN
5 amendments...
Amendment 104 #
Council position Article 2 - paragraph 2 - point c a (new) (ca) "One-stop shop" shall mean the entity set up by each infrastructure manager of the freight corridor which offers applicants the opportunity to request in a single place and in a single operation a train path for a journey crossing at least one border along the freight corridor.
Amendment 109 #
Council position Article 3 - paragraph 1 1. The Member States referred to in Annex I shall establish at the latest t
Amendment 120 #
Council position Article 7 - paragraph 4 4. The management board shall take its decisions, including decisions regarding its legal status, resources and staffing, on the basis of mutual consent of the infrastructure managers concerned and taking into account the opinion of the railway undertakings, in particular, through their designated representatives. In case of disagreement between the infrastructure managers and the representatives of the advisory group of railway undertakings, the infrastructure managers’ decision shall prevail. The management board shall inform the executive board of the disagreement.
Amendment 128 #
Council position Article 7 a (new) 7a. The management board shall set up an advisory group made up of railway undertakings using the freight corridor. The railway undertakings of the advisory group shall nominate their representatives in the management board (up to the total number of infrastructure managers that are members of the management board plus one). Once nominated, the representatives of the railway undertakings using the corridor will become full members of the management board on a consultative basis only, and may issue an opinion on any proposal by the management board which has direct consequences on the railway undertakings using the corridor. The advisory group may also issue own- initiative opinions. Infrastructure managers on the corridor shall be responsible for informing railway undertakings who are new to using the corridor of the existence of the advisory group, so that they can join if they so wish and take part in the nomination or renewal of the representative of the advisory group to the management board.
Amendment 143 #
Council position Article 12 a (new) 1. The management board of the freight corridor shall define and periodically update categories of freight paths, which shall be valid throughout the freight corridor. At least one of these categories (hereinafter referred to as "facilitated freight") shall include, among these categories of paths, train paths with an efficient transport time and guaranteed punctuality. 2. The criteria defining the categories of freight traffic shall be adopted by the governance body after consultation of the applicants likely to use the freight corridor as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2001/14/EC.
source: PE-440.164
|
| 42 |
2008/2186(DEC) 2007 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission
2010/03/03
CONT
42 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 12 #
Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 14 #
Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution with observations forming an integral part of the Decisions on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2008, Section III – Commission and executive agencies Heading before paragraph -1 (new) Overriding concerns
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Remains concerned, at the start of the new Commission’s term of office, about accumulated problems deriving from the previous Commission, notably: – continuing high rates of error in payments, – slowness in recoveries of undue payments, and – carryovers at unprecedented high levels;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 a (new) -1a. Welcomes the initial signs of a collegial approach from the new Commission, as demonstrated in the engagement of Commissioners Andor, Hahn and Semeta in discussions with Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control, and expects a strong statement from Commissioners Lewandowski and Semeta promising action in the areas of: Member State statements of assurance, proposals for tolerable risk of error, simplification and transparency, and trust funds covering external actions, and further believes that this must cover further action in the area of corrections and recoveries, and internal control systems;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 b(new) -1b. Believes that errors in expenditure hinder effectiveness in achieving EU policy targets, and reiterates that policy groups with an error rate below 2 % still account for only 47 % of the EU budget, representing an increase of just 9 % from 2005 to 2008; considers that this is still an inadequate level of improvement year on year and points out that, despite some areas of improvement, an error rate above 5 % remains in policy groups which account for 31 % of the budget, and a rate of between 2 % and 5 % for a further 22 %;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 c (new) -1c. Calls on the Commission to prepare and submit to Parliament a new Action Plan for 2010 onwards, providing for an acceleration in the reduction of error rates so as to ensure that a further 20 % of the budget can be given an ECA ‘green’ classification by 2014, with interim targets for an error rate below 2 % in 70 % of expenditure, and a goal of reducing to 15 % the proportion of the budget with an ECA ‘red’ classification in 2011; considers that reaching these targets is an essential part of getting full value for EU expenditure in the future and progressing towards a positive DAS;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 d (new) -1d. Calls on the Commission President to inform Parliament about how the Commission will operate in a more coordinated way, so as to address remaining weaknesses in the financial systems and significantly reduce error rates as indicated above;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Is concerned that outstanding budgetary commitments (unused commitments carried forward to be used in future years), mainly on multiannual programmes, increased in 2008 by EUR 16,4 billion (11,8 %) to EUR 155,0 billion (point 3.9 of the 2008 Annual Report), whilst acknowledging that this is due to delays in the start-up phase of the new programmes, and is concerned that unused funds each year represent lost opportunities for implementation of EU policies and programmes;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Requests the Commission to present complete and reliable figures for financial corrections and, in particular, recoveries specifying the Member State concerned, the exact budget line and the year to which the individual recoveries relate (as already specified in the Discharge Report for 20061), given that any other presentation makes serious control impossible;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Draws attention to the example of Greece, where significant financial corrections brought about by Commission decision appear to have resulted in better performance in the implementation and control systems in the Cohesion Policy area;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Welcomes the statement by the Interparliamentary Conference on ‘Improving National Accountability of EU funds’ which took place in The Hague on 28-29 January 2010, recommending that national policy instruments be implemented or strengthened to contribute to the improvement of the control and management of EU expenditure in Member States, and that instruments used for the management and accountability of EU funding should contain elements of a common EU framework in order to make comparisons and identify ‘best practices’;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Notwithstanding the progressive improvement in the DAS since 2003 (56 % of expenditure
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 55 55. Invites the Commission to establish an interinstitutional dialogue for the determination of the rates of error, which may vary in different policy areas, and calls on the Commission to carry out such comparative analysis, inasmuch as this will form the sole basis making it possible to establish an ‘acceptable risk level’;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 78.
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 79 79. Welcomes the fact that the Court considered that, overall, the Member States’ statements regarding traditional own resources sent to the Commission were reliable and free from material error and also that the VAT– and GNI-based own resources were correctly calculated
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 80 80. Notes however, regarding the VAT- based own resources, that
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 81 81. Asks the Commission, regarding GNI- based own resources, to follow the Court’s recommendation in point 4.36 of its 2008 Annual Report and to communicate to Parliament
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 97 a (new) 97a. Notes with concern the difficulties encountered by Member States’ authorities as regards both the transposition of the 2007-2013 regulatory requirements (such as incompatibility issues between EU and national levels, delays in the establishment of the rules, unclear rules) and the establishment of the new management and control systems (allocation of tasks for the new institutions, i.e. the managing, certifying and audit authorities);
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 100 100. Welcomes the Commission’s
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 101 101.
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 105 a (new) 105a. Requests the Commission to identify and spread best practices amongst Member States in order to allow an increased absorption of funds and improved beneficiary cash-flow by amending and simplifying the Structural Funds implementing regulations at national level;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 118 118. Notes that some legal provisions regarding research funding (e.g. concerning sanctions) were not applied previously, and calls on the Commission to end this state of affairs and to ensure the full and consistent application of the existing legal provisions;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Heading after paragraph 124 Second-generation Schengen Information System
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 124 a (new) 124a. Is very concerned about the delays in setting up the second-generation Schengen Information System and the implications of these delays for the EU budget and the Member States’ budgets; notes that the so-called ‘milestone 1 test’ concerning the stability, reliability and performance of the SIS II project, carried out at the end of January 2010, was not successful;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 124 b (new) 124b. Recalls the Commission’s obligation under Council Regulation (EC) No 1104/2008 of 24 October 2008 on migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS I+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)1 and Council Decision 2008/839/JHA of 24 October 2008 on migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS I+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)2 to submit a progress report concerning the development of SIS II and the migration from SIS I + to SIS II to the European Parliament and the Council every six months and for the first time after the first six months of 2009; notes that the first progress report, covering the period from January 2009 until June 2009 (COM(2009)0555) and published on 22 October 2009, is outdated and that the second progress report is not yet available;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 124 c (new) Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 124 d (new) 124d. Stresses that the Commission should comply with its reporting obligations in a more timely and transparent manner;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 124 e (new) 124e. Invites the European Court of Auditors to carry out an in-depth audit and to present a special report evaluating the management of the SIS II project by the Commission, from the beginning of the project starting with the initial call for tenders;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 124 f (new) 124f. Reserves the right to hold in reserve the funds to be allocated for the development of SIS II in the 2011 annual budget, in order to ensure full parliamentary scrutiny and oversight of the process;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 135 135. Notes with satisfaction the improvement in the clarity and structure of the Commission’s assessments of compliance with the requirements of the
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution – Conclusions concerning the special reports issued by the Court of Auditors Part XVI a (new) Part XVIa Special report No 16/2009 on the European Commission’s management of pre-accession assistance to Turkey
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution – Conclusions concerning the special reports issued by the Court of Auditors Part XVI a – Paragraph 260 a (new) 260a. Welcomes the Court’s sound assessment regarding the administration by the Commission of pre-accession assistance to Turkey;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution – Conclusions concerning the special reports issued by the Court of Auditors Part XVI a – Paragraph 260 b (new) 260b. Considers it worrying that the strategic planning for 2002-2004 as well as the 236 ‘priorities’ of the accession partnership in 2006 did not include any ranking in terms of importance or any consideration of the level/measures required concerning progress towards accession; criticises the obvious lack of efficient use of European financial aid; is disappointed that between 2006 and 2008 priorities which were marked as ‘short- term’ did not achieve any significant progress;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution – Conclusions concerning the special reports issued by the Court of Auditors Part XVI a – Paragraph 260c (new) 260c. Underlines the Court’s call for a robust methodology with which to determine the strategic objectives for which EU financial assistance is most needed; considers that the designated measures for achieving each strategic objective need to be clearly defined; requests the Commission to ensure that the various project proposals include specific, quantifiable, realistic and relevant objectives so that their contribution demonstrably achieves strategic objectives;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution – Conclusions concerning the special reports issued by the Court of Auditors Part XVI a – Paragraph 260 d (new) 260d. Points out that, even though the Commission has introduced measures aimed at addressing many of the weaknesses in the Decentralised Implementation System, in particular since the introduction of the new Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA 2007-2013), the Commission still has to address the remaining weaknesses in overall programming and performance management, as recommended by the Court; also expects the Commission to make the Turkish authorities aware of this fact so that project proposals are drawn up which would allow the strategic objectives relating to the financing of the European Union to be achieved within a realistic timescale; considers that the Commission should undertake new initiatives in order to improve the design and implementation of the projects by the institutions of the Decentralised Implementation System (measures such as compulsory needs assessments and better scheduling of contracting arrangements);
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution – Conclusions concerning the special reports issued by the Court of Auditors Part XVI a – Paragraph 260 e (new) 260e. Recalls the importance of an evaluation by the Commission of the entirety of the programme for pre- accession assistance to Turkey;
source: PE-439.267
|
| 2 |
2008/2277(DEC) 2007 discharge: EU general budget, Council
2009/10/15
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Encourages the formulation and inclusion in the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management of an Annex specifically dealing with the discharge procedure
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 - introductory part 5.
source: PE-430.342
|
| 1 |
2009/0170(COD) Civil aviation safety: investigation and prevention of accidents and incidents (repeal. Directive 94/56/EC)
2010/10/05
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Safety investigation authorities shall draw up annual reports detailing the occurrence categories, locations and circumstances and the people involved. Those reports shall be made public for the purpose of assessing aviation safety.
source: PE-441.211
|
| 9 |
2009/0173(COD) Reduction of CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles: emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles
2010/10/05
TRAN
9 amendments...
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Manufacturers should have flexibility to decide how to meet their targets under this Regulation and should be allowed to average emissions over their new vehicle fleet rather than having to respect CO2 targets for each individual vehicle. Manufacturers should therefore be required to ensure that the average specific emission for all the new light commercial vehicles registered in the Community for which they are responsible does not exceed the average of the emissions targets for those vehicles. This requirement should be phased in between 201
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 For the calendar year commencing 1 January 201
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – indents 1, 2 and 3 – 65% in 2015, – 75% in 201
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new) As of 1 January 2016, completed vehicles shall also be included in determining each manufacturer’s average specific CO2 emissions.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – indent 1 –
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 - indent 2 -
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 The European Commission shall make a proposal to the European Parliament and Council on those measures, designed to amend
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. By 1 January 2018, the Commission shall complete a review of the specific emission target in Annex I and of the derogations in Article 10, with the aim of defining: – the modalities for reaching a long-term target of 145 g CO2/km, starting in 2025, in a cost-effective manner; and – the aspects of the implementation of said targets, including the excess emissions premium. On the basis of such a review and its impact assessment, which includes an overall assessment of the impact on the car industry and its dependent industries, the Commission shall, if appropriate, – make a proposal to amend this Regulation in a way which is as neutral as possible from the point of view of competition, and which is socially equitable and sustainable. The European Commission shall make a proposal to the European Parliament and European Council on those measures, designed to amend essential elements of this Regulation
source: PE-441.205
|
| 1 |
2010/2001(BUD) 2011 budget: all sections, first version
2010/09/13
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Article 2 b (new) 2b. Believes that the EU Budget can and should be used to support initiatives to promote the green economy, cohesion and trans European networks which can enhance much-needed employment in the current economic climate, and regrets the severity of the cuts proposed by the Council during the 2011 budget negotiations;
source: PE-448.696
|
| 3 |
2010/2002(BUD) 2011 budget: draft mandate for the draft budget conciliation procedure before the first reading
2010/12/05
BUDG
3 amendments...
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a new 20a. Welcomes the effort that has been made on TEN-Ts but, as regards the budget for transport, which is strategic for the European economy and social life, expresses concern about the constraints and lack of margin that weighs upon all remaining transport policies;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b new 20b. Is disappointed that tourism, which indirectly generates more than 10% of the EU's GDP and which has become a full competence of the EU with the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, is not clearly identified in the 2011 DB;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c new 20c. Insists that new resources generated by transport should be specifically allocated to transport; stresses that Cohesion and Regional Funds should be linked to TEN-T projects;
source: PE-441.198
|
| 6 |
2010/2004(BUD) 2011 budget, section III, Commission: guidelines
2010/02/26
BUDG
6 amendments...
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a new 14 a. Stresses that transport is an essential element of the European economy, enabling the mobility of persons, goods and knowledge across borders; underlines that transport is a vector of equality and social mobility, for young people in particular, since it opens up opportunities and improves exchanges in the field of knowledge and training;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Underlines that the priorities for 2011, in view of the EU 2020 strategy, will be financed mainly from this heading, and that the Lisbon Treaty's extension of EU competences (for example in space policy and tourism) is likely to have budgetary implications;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a new 25a. Refers to Title XII, Article 195 on 'Tourism' of the Treaty of Lisbon, and demands that full and close attention should be paid to the promotion and networking of cross-border sustainable tourism initiatives that contribute to soft mobility, climate protection and the creation of a favourable environment for the development of small and medium enterprises;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a new 26a. Recalls that, in the context of Europe's economic recovery, investment in transport particularly via investment in the TEN-Ts, has a crucial role to play in driving forward growth and employment as well as in advancing Europe's economic and environmental interests;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b new 26b. Attaches high importance to transport safety in all modes and considers, particularly after the recent tragic railway accidents and the continuing high level of road fatalities, that the EU should boost co-funding efforts within the TEN-Ts and other financing instruments for improving safety systems;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Expects the fight against climate change to remain high on the EU’s ‘post- Copenhagen’ political agenda in 2010 and 2011, and recalls that, as part of a broader approach, sustainable development is an ongoing responsibility to the next generations; asks the Commission to provide a clear action plan and timetable for the implementation of appropriations under the EU action programme to combat climate change; underlines that the transport sector represents a great potential in the fight against climate change and calls on the Commission to give priority to measures for decarbonisation in all transport modes; recalls that the release of the reserve on this line will depend upon the Commission’s proposals;
source: PE-439.297
|
| 3 |
2010/2211(INI) Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe
2011/08/04
SURE
3 amendments...
Amendment 598 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 59 d (new) 59d. Recalls that transport underpins Europe’s economic and social activity, that the transport sector represents 4.6% of the European Union’s GDP, while employing 9.2 million individuals, and that, as well as allowing communication between individuals and communities and providing the network enabling growth in intra-European trade and the completion of the single market, the sector is significant in terms of its potential contribution to ensuring social, economic and territorial cohesion;
Amendment 600 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 60 60.
Amendment 613 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 61 61. Considers that an increase in TEN-T funds to 500 billion euro in 2007-2020, out of which 270 billion euro for the priority axis is necessary, as well as increased coordination between the funds available for TEN-T and the cohesion funding for transport projects; considers that expenditure used from the cohesion fund should be conditional upon the observation of general principles of European transport policy;
source: PE-462.730
|
| 1 |
2010/2248(INI) EIB annual report for 2009
2011/02/02
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the time has come for strategic long-term investment in Europe to be substantially increased; with a particular focus on key areas of European infrastructures and cohesion;
source: PE-458.477
|
| 1 |
2011/0177(APP) Multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020
2012/12/07
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines that the additional €10bn from the Cohesion fund are to be centrally managed under the CEF in order to deliver clear EU-added value in Cohesion countries; stresses that the Commission decision shall be based on a principle of investing money within the territory of a beneficial country along the agreed TEN- T project;
source: PE-492.576
|
| 15 |
2011/0275(COD) European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): support to the Investment for growth and jobs goal
2012/05/23
TRAN
15 amendments...
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The ERDF should contribute to the Europe 2020 strategy, thus ensuring greater concentration of ERDF support on the priorities of the Union. According to the category of regions supported, the support from the ERDF should be primarily concentrated on research and innovation, small and medium-sized enterprises and climate change mitigation. The degree of concentration should take into account the level of development of the region as well as the specific needs of regions whose GDP per capita for the 2007-13 period was less than 75% of the average GDP of the EU-25 for the reference period.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) A shift towards sustainable mobility - based on multimodal transport, integrated transport systems and diversion of international and transit traffic out of the city centres - is crucial to achieve its EU 2020 targets, given that transport accounts for 24 % of all CO2 emissions in the Union and transport in the Union has seen its emissions increase by 34 % since 1990. The sustainable mobility will require major investments, e.g. in bypassing urban areas, promotion of modern and environmentally friendly public transport, intelligent traffic management systems as well as public logistic platforms or intermodal terminals.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 c (new) (7 c) New funding priorities focusing on the achievement of complex multimodal transport are indispensable.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) In order to identify or test new solutions to issues relating to sustainable urban development which are of relevance at Union level, the ERDF should support innovative actions and technologies in the field of sustainable urban development including innovative traffic management systems.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The ERDF should address the problems of accessibility to, and remoteness from, large markets facing areas with an extremely low population density, as referred to in Protocol No 6 on special provisions for Objective 6 in the framework of the Structural Funds in Finland and Sweden to the 1994 Act of Accession. The ERDF should also address the specific difficulties encountered by certain islands, mountainous areas, border regions and sparsely populated areas whose geographical situation slows down their development, with a view to supporting their sustainable development. As a next point, the ERDF should address the problems of regular transport services to and from national and regional capitals, links between cities and their surrounding areas - including rural areas - or regions, connections of industrial zones and international airports as well as cultural exchange and tourism infrastructure.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) investments in infrastructure providing basic services to citizens in the areas of energy, environment,
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d – point iii (iii) support to public research and innovation bodies and investment in technology
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point e (e) promoting low-carbon strategies for urban areas, including sustainable mobility chains that combine walking- cycling-carpooling-public transport and mobility, intelligent traffic management systems and diversion of international and transit traffic out of the city centres;
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a (a) supporting a multimodal Single European Transport Area by investing in the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) network and the modernisation of existing fundamental infrastructure;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b (b) enhancing regional and local mobility through connecting secondary and tertiary nodes and other places to TEN-T infrastructure and among each other where relevant;
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point d a (new) (d a) developing a complex system of multimodal transport including public logistic platforms, intermodal terminals and initial support of regular intermodal transport links as well as inclusion of industrial zones and international airports in multimodal transport and their adequate connection to trans-European and fundamental national infrastructure;
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The ERDF shall support, within operational programmes, sustainable urban development through strategies setting out integrated actions to tackle the economic, environmental, climate, transport and social challenges affecting urban areas.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – row 15 Railway km Total length of new railway line of which: TEN-T km Total length of repaired, reconstructed or upgraded railway line of which: TEN-T
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – row 19 Roads km Total length of newly built roads of which: TEN-T km Total length of repaired, reconstructed or upgraded roads of which: TEN-T
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – row 20 a (new) International airports minutes Total reduction of the average time needed to reach the airport by means of public transport from the nearest city centre
source: PE-489.577
|
| 9 |
2011/0276(COD) Structural instruments: common provisions for ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD and EMFF; general provisions applicable to ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund
2012/05/23
TRAN
9 amendments...
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The objectives of the CSF Funds should be pursued in the framework of sustainable development and the Union's promotion of the aim of protecting and improving the environment as set out in Article 11 and 19 of the Treaty, taking into account primarily the polluter pays principle. The Member States should provide information on the support for climate change objectives in line with the ambition to devote at least 20% of the Union budget to this end, using a methodology adopted by the Commission by implementing act.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 57 (57) It is necessary to fix the limits of those resources for
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 90 (90) The Commission should be empowered to adopt, by means of implementing acts, as regards all CSF Funds, decisions approving the Partnership Contracts, decisions on the allocation of the performance reserve, decisions suspending payments linked to Member States' economic policies, and, in the case of decommitment, decisions to amend decisions adopting programmes; and as regards the Funds, decisions identifying the regions and Member States fulfilling the Investment for growth and jobs criteria, decisions setting out the annual breakdown of commitment appropriations to the Member States,
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 7 7. The part of the Union budget allocated to the CSF Funds shall be implemented within the framework of shared management between the Member States and the Commission, in accordance with Article 53(b) of the Financial Regulation, with the exception of
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 The objectives of the CSF Funds shall be pursued in the framework of sustainable development and the Union's promotion of the aim of protecting and improving the environment, as set out in Article 11 of the Treaty, taking into account primarily the polluter pays principle.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 The Member States and the Commission shall ensure that environmental protection requirements, resource efficiency, climate change mitigation and adaptation, transport sustainability and transport efficiency, disaster resilience and risk prevention and management are promoted in the preparation and implementation of Partnership Contracts and programmes. Member States shall provide information on the support for climate change objectives using the methodology adopted by the Commission. The Commission shall adopt this methodology by means of an implementing act. The implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 143(3).
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (7) promoting sustainable transport
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 9 (9) promoting social inclusion, cultural exchange, tourism and combating poverty;
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 Member States shall concentrate support, in accordance with the Fund-specific rules, on actions bringing the greatest added value in relation to the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth within the time frame of the multiannual financial framework 2014-2020, addressing the challenges identified in the country-specific recommendations under Article 121(2) of the Treaty and the relevant Council recommendations adopted under 148(4) of the Treaty, and taking into account national and regional needs.
source: PE-489.578
|
| 34 |
2011/0294(COD) Trans-European transport network: guidelines
2012/04/10
TRAN
11 amendments...
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes the guidelines should contain provisions regarding the security and safety of passengers and freight movements, the impact of climate change and of potential natural and man-made disasters on infrastructure and accessibility for all transport users, including persons with reduced mobility.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Core network corridors should also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate modal integration and multi- modal operations. This should allow specially developed corridors that are optimised in terms of energy use and emissions, thus minimising environmental impacts, and are also attractive for their reliability, limited congestion and low operating and administrative costs. An initial list of corridors should be included in the Regulation (EU) XXX/2012 [Connecting Europe Facility], but should be adaptable in order to take account of changes in traffic flows. Based on this list, the core network corridors shall be illustrated by a schematic indicative map contained in Annex I of this Regulation.
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o (o) ‘urban node’ means an urban area
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) freight terminals
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) stations along the lines indicated in Annex I for the barrier-free access and transfer of passengers within the rail mode and between rail and other transport modes;
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) railway lines are equipped with ERTMS, except in duly justified cases where derogations under TSIs 'specific cases' apply;
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) railway infrastructure complies with the requirements of the
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1 (1) nominal track gauge for new railway lines: 1 435 mm, except in duly justified cases where derogations under TSIs 'specific cases' apply;
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 2 (2) electrification, except in duly justified cases where derogations under TSIs 'specific cases' apply;
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 3 (3) lines which are used by conventional freight trains: 22,5 t axle load, and 750 m train length, except in duly justified cases where derogations under TSIs 'specific cases' apply;
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c – subpoint 4 (4) maximum gradients for new lines which are to be used by conventional freight trains: 12,5 mm/m
source: PE-494.841
2012/08/10
TRAN
11 amendments...
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class IV waterways as laid down in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN) on the new classification of inland waterways and ensure continuous bridge clearance in full compliance with the provisions laid down in Article 42.
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (b a) Rivers, canals and lakes shall guarantee good navigation status through close coordination and standards on minimum service levels as regards the navigation function, waterway infrastructure maintenance and safety across waterways.
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) connecting inland port infrastructure to rail
Amendment 550 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Within the sphere of their responsibility, Member States, operators of freight terminals, ports and airports, and infrastructure managers shall, in a fair and non-discriminatory manner, ensure that:
Amendment 594 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The infrastructure of the core network shall meet all the requirements set out in Chapter II
Amendment 605 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 – full electrification of the railway lines except in duly justified cases where derogations under TSIs 'specific cases' apply;
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 – lines with
Amendment 673 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. With regards to rail infrastructure, the governance structure of rail freight corridors (Regulation (EU) No 913/2010) will be fully integrated into those of the core network corridors.
Amendment 685 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Based on Annex I to Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 [Connecting Europe Facility], the core network corridors shall be illustrated by a schematic indicative map contained in Annex I of this Regulation.
Amendment 710 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States concerned and
Amendment 748 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) adjust the schematic indicative map for the core network corridors whenever the list of core network corridors set out Annex I to Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [Connecting Europe Facility] is changed.
source: PE-494.842
2012/11/10
TRAN
12 amendments...
Amendment 816 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 to add the connection Berlin - Küstrin- Kietz - Kostrzyn nad Odrą - Gdańsk to the rail comprehensive network
Amendment 817 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 to add the connection Berlin - Forst (Lausitz) - Wrocław to the rail core network
Amendment 828 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 to add the connection Berlin - Küstrin- Kietz - Kostrzyn nad Odrą - Gdańsk to the rail comprehensive network
Amendment 829 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 to add the connection Berlin - Forst (Lausitz) - Wrocław to the rail core network
Amendment 847 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 to add the connection Berlin - Küstrin- Kietz - Kostrzyn nad Odrą - Gdańsk to the rail comprehensive network
Amendment 848 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 to add the connection Berlin - Forst (Lausitz) - Wrocław to the rail core network
Amendment 849 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 to add the connection Berlin - Szczecin to the rail core network
Amendment 850 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 to add the connection Berlin - Szczecin as rail and road core network section
Amendment 865 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 to add the connection Berlin - Szczecin to the rail core network
Amendment 866 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 to add the connection Berlin - Szczecin as rail and road core network section
Amendment 872 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 to add the connection Berlin - Küstrin- Kietz - Kostrzyn nad Odrą - Gdańsk to the rail comprehensive network
Amendment 873 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 to add the connection Berlin - Forst (Lausitz) - Wrocław to the rail core network
source: PE-496.673
|
| 12 |
2011/0302(COD) Connecting Europe Facility
2012/10/10
TRAN, ITRE
7 amendments...
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) actions securing and improving rail connections with industrial areas and sites, namely through the upgrading or construction of industrial sidings, transhipment terminals for wagonload traffic, terminals for intermodal traffic and train formation facilities for rail freight or through the use of green logistics software networks;
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost; the funding rate may be increased to 30% for actions addressing bottlenecks; the funding rate may be increased to
Amendment 451 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) with regard to grants for the purchase of new locomotives in conjunction with a scrapping bonus for (i) diesel or hybrid locomotives if emissions are distinctively reduced compared to the scrapped diesel or hybrid locomotive; the funding rate shall not exceed 20% of the eligible costs of the new locomotive. (ii) electric locomotives if cross border operation is distinctively enhanced compared to the scrapped locomotive; the funding rate shall not exceed 20% of the eligible costs of the new locomotive.
Amendment 549 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Multiannual work programmes in the field of transport shall be adopted for projects of common interest as listed in Part I of the Annex to this Regulation, in which the percentage of funds allocated to less polluting modes shall be at least 85% of the total transport budget.
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 4 Member States shall inform the Commission continuously, if relevant through the interactive geographical and technical information systems, which in case of the trans-European transport networks is TENtec, about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for this purpose including the amount of support used for climate change objectives. The TENtec shall be publicly and easily accessible. It shall contain project-specific and updated information on the forms and amounts of EU co-funding as well as on the progress of each project.
Amendment 584 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall
source: PE-496.338
2012/10/17
TRAN, ITRE
5 amendments...
Amendment 601 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – introductory part Helsinki – Tallinn – Riga – Kaunas – Warszawa – Katowice Gdynia – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava – Brno – Wien Katowice – Žilina – Bratislava – Wien Wien – Graz – Klagenfurt – Villach – Udine – Venezia – Bologna – Ravenna Graz – Ljubljana – Koper/Trieste Szczecin/Świnoujście - Poznań/Zielona Góra - Wrocław - Ostrava
Amendment 602 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – introductory part Helsinki – Tallinn – Riga – Kaunas – Warszawa – Katowice Gdynia – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava – Brno – Wien Katowice – Žilina – Bratislava – Wien Wien – Graz – Klagenfurt – Villach – Udine – Venezia – Bologna – Ravenna Graz – Ljubljana – Koper/Trieste Szczecin/Świnoujście - Poznań - Wrocław - Ostrava
Amendment 620 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – row 9 a (new) Wrocław - Poznań - Rail works Szczecin/Świnoujście
Amendment 621 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – row 9 a (new) Wrocław - Rail works Poznań/Zielona Góra - Szczecin/Świnoujście
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – row 9 b (new) Świnoujście, Szczecin Port port interconnections
source: PE-497.891
|
| 3 |
2011/0392(COD) European satellite navigation systems: implementation and exploitation 2014-2020
2012/06/13
TRAN
3 amendments...
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. The Galileo and EGNOS programmes shall cover the development of applications and all the activities needed to define, develop, validate, construct, operate, renew a
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) an exploitation phase
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) activities relating to applications' research and development, and ensure the adoption of the European GNSS.
source: PE-489.681
|
| 2 |
2011/0397(COD) Groundhandling services at Union airports
2012/10/10
TRAN
2 amendments...
Amendment 55 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
Amendment 57 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 2 The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
source: PE-496.364
|
| 3 |
2011/2019(BUD) 2012 budget: mandate for the trilogue
2011/05/24
BUDG
3 amendments...
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Stresses the European added value of investments in cross-border transport, particularly the TEN-T programme, which improve trans-border and intermodal connections, thus promoting economic development and employment; recalling the traditional under-funding of TEN-T, urges that increased resources be made available for this purpose, including through recourse to alternative sources of financing such as Public Private Partnerships (PPP), earmarking of revenues and other forms of financial instrument; underlines that Cohesion and Regional Funds should be closely linked to TEN-T projects;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Recalls that the bulk of the new EU competences introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, in the areas of energy, tourism and space, falls within the remit of Heading 1a; expresses its disappointment that no extra funding for these new policies is proposed by the Commission in the third year after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty; underlines that neither Galileo nor GMES – the two main EU space programmes – is to benefit from extra funding by the end of the current MFF and that the Galileo funding is decreasing between 2011 and 2012; reiterates the need to introduce some specific, visible measures in support of tourism, given the economic relevance of this sector, which represents the third
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Underlines the absence of a specific budget allocation to the Programme to support the further development of an Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP), which should be operational by the end of this year and will need operational credits for 2012;
source: PE-465.029
|
| 1 |
2011/2196(INI) Future of regional airports and air services in the EU
2012/07/02
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Acknowledges the need for reliable LAG (liquids, aerosols and gels) screening equipment that ensures a high degree of probability of detection of a wide range of liquid explosives
source: PE-480.772
|
| 3 |
2012/0062(COD) Port State control: aligning the Directive to the Maritime Labour Convention requirements
2012/10/23
TRAN
3 amendments...
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point -1 (new) Directive 2009/16/EC Article 1 – point a (-1) In Article 1, point (a) is replaced by: ‘(a) adopting the enforcement of the provisions of the international Conventions as defined in Article 2 (1) of this Directive as a responsibility of the competent authorities of the Member States and increasing compliance with international and relevant Union legislation on maritime safety, maritime security, protection of the marine environment and on-board living and working conditions of ships of all flags;’
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 1 a (new) Directive 2009/16/EC Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (1a) In Article 3(1), subparagraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. This Directive shall apply to any ship and its crew in waters within the jurisdiction of a Member State.’
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 1 b (new) Directive 2009/16/EC Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 and 3 (1b) In Article 3(1), subparagraphs 2 and 3 are deleted.
source: PE-498.063
|
| 9 |
2012/0184(COD) Periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers. 'Roadworthiness package'
2013/03/28
TRAN
2 amendments...
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) A large fraction of total emissions of road transport, in particular CO2 emissions, is due to a minority of vehicles with malfunctioning emission control systems. It is estimated that 5% of the vehicle fleet causes 25% of all pollutant emissions. This also applies to an increase in particulates and NOx emissions from modern engine designs which require a more comprehensive emission test, including check by operation using an electronic control device of the integrity and functionality of the vehicle's own on- board diagnostic (OBD) system, verified by existing tailpipe testing to ensure a complete emission system test, as OBD only is not reliable. Therefore, a periodic regime of roadworthiness tests would also contribute to improve the environment through the reduction of the average vehicle emissions.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. Roadworthiness tests shall be carried out only by the competent authority of a Member State or by testing centres authorised by Member States or by the supervising bodies set up by them.
source: PE-507.994
2013/04/03
TRAN
7 amendments...
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Item 4.1.2. 4.1.2. Alignment Determine the horizontal (a) Aim of a headlamp not a
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Item 4.1.3. 4.1.3. Switching Visual inspection and by (a) Switch does not operation
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Item 4.1.5. 4.1.5. Levelling devices Visual inspection and by (a) Device not (where mandatory)
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Item 4.3.2. 4.3.2.
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Item 4.5.2. 4.5.2 Alignment (X)(2) by operation and using a Front fog lamp out of headlamp aiming device horizontal a
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Item 8.2.1.2 – column 2 8.2.1.2 Gaseous emissions Measurement using an exhaust gas analyser in accordance with the requirements(1). Even
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Item 8.2.2.2 8.2.2.2 Opacity Vehicles registered or put
source: PE-508.077
|
| 7 |
2012/0186(COD) Technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union. 'Roadworthiness package'
2013/03/28
TRAN
7 amendments...
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Roadworthiness testing is a part of a wider regime ensuring that vehicles are kept in a condition which complies with the existing safety and environmental
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 Each Member State shall carry out in every calendar year a total number of initial roadside inspections, corresponding to at least
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. A more detailed roadside inspection shall be carried out using a mobile inspection unit, or in a testing centre as referred to in Regulation (EU) NO XXX/XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council of [date] on roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and for their trailers. In the case of an inspection carried out in a testing centre, controllers shall book in advance a free capacity in the centre so that periodic inspections already scheduled will not be affected.
source: PE-508.051
|
| 3 |
2012/0190(COD) Reducing CO2 emissions from new passenger cars: modalities for reaching the 2020 target
2013/02/28
TRAN
3 amendments...
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 Article 1 – paragraph 2 From 2020 onwards, this Regulation sets a target of 95 g CO2/km as average emissions for the new
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 Article 2 – paragraph 4 Article 4, Article 8(4)(b) and (c), Article 9 and Article 10(1)(a) and (c) shall not apply to a manufacturer which is responsible together with all of its connected undertakings for less than
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 4 Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 Article 5 a (new) – paragraph 1 In calculating the average specific emissions of CO2, each new passenger car with specific emissions of CO2 of less than 35 g CO2/km shall be counted as 1.
source: PE-506.122
|
| 5 |
2012/0191(COD) Reducing CO2 emissions from new light commercial vehicles: modalities for reaching the 2020 target
2013/02/27
TRAN
5 amendments...
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) According to the technical analysis made for the impact assessment, the technologies to meet the target of 147 g CO2/km are available and the required reductions may be achieved at a lower cost than estimated in the previous analysis carried out previous to the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011. In addition, the distance between the current average specific emissions of CO2 from new light commercial vehicles and the target has also decreased.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 Article 1 – paragraph 2 From 2020, this Regulation sets a target of 1
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 Article 2 – paragraph 4 Article 4, Article 8(4)(b) and (c), Article 9 and Article 10(1)(a) and (c) shall not apply to a manufacturer which is responsible together with all of its connected undertakings for less than
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 5 – point c Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 Annex 1 – point 1 – point c Indicative specific emissions of CO2 = 1
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 5 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 Annex I – point 1 – point b a (new) (5a) In point 1 of Annex I, the following point (ba) is added: "(ba) From 2025: Specific emissions of CO2 = 100 + a × (M – M0) Where: M = mass of the vehicle in kilograms (kg) M0 = the value adopted pursuant to Article 13(2) a = equivalent to 100% slope
source: PE-506.121
|
| 1 | 2012/0202(COD) Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading: timing of auctions |
| 6 |
2012/2056(INI) eCall: new 112 service for citizens
2012/09/05
IMCO, TRAN
6 amendments...
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Considers that eCall should be a
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Urges the Commission to submit a proposal within the framework of Directive 2007/46/EC in order to ensure the mandatory deployment of a
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Urges the Commission to adopt the common specifications for PSAPs within the framework of the ITS Directive by the end of 2012, and to
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 source: PE-489.409
|
| 1 |
2012/2297(INI) Blue growth - Enhancing sustainable growth in the EU's marine, maritime transport and tourism sectors
2013/05/02
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Stresses that the EU shipbuilding industry has the potential to increase its contribution to growth and employment by exploiting the opportunities arising from demand for
source: PE-510.615
|
| 9 |
2012/2298(INI) Promoting a European transport-technology strategy for Europe's future sustainable mobility
2013/04/11
TRAN
9 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises that a European transport- technology strategy for Europe's future sustainable mobility should be based on the Union's targets and legislation regarding the reduction of energy consumption, traffic noise, air pollutants, raw materials and greenhouse gas emissions up to 2020, 2030 and 2050, as well as improving health and quality of life, increasing the quality of services and enhancing safety and security;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that more efficient, coherent and targeted use of R&I in the setting and implementation of transport policy is key in order to respond to new realities, breaking away from conventional thinking and focusing on pioneering ideas;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that R&I should also focus on the development of sustainable infrastructure elements supporting the migration of renewable primary products such as wood or compound material as railway infrastructure components (e.g. poles for catenary or signalisation, building material for platform or bridges). This also includes R&I activities developing an alternative for creosote as impregnation substance for wooden sleepers which will be abolished in 2018 due to EU legislation;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the need for research on fair intra- and intermodal competition in the transport sector, including technological tools for improving the enforcement of, and controls on, social conditions and minimum working conditions and wages;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is convinced that innovative technologies connected with the interaction between
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Confirms that efforts to achieve cleaner power for transport and mobility technologies should be linked to more efficient concepts involving less volume and weight, as well as better vehicle design; underlines the potential of innovative energy savings through better use of wind, waves, sun, gravitation and energy harvesting measures such as regenerative forces;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Believes that European Satellite Navigation Systems such as Galileo should be a major pillar for developing intelligent and efficient transport in Europe;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses that the need to develop innovative long-lasting infrastructure and solutions – including greater development of information, payment and reservation systems – that lead to win-win situations in terms of barrier-free accessibility for disabled people and persons with reduced mobility (PRMs), such as users with wheelchairs, buggies, bicycles or heavy luggage;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Highlights the need for the Commission to improve its activities in the transfer of knowledge resulting from R&I activities to interested users (such as SMEs or research institutes) by creating a clustered database providing a clear categorised overview of all R&I projects funded by the EU;
source: PE-507.954
|
Bogusław LIBERADZKI on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
Term 6 20.07.2004 - 13.07.2009
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |