Philip BRADBOURN
Constituencies
-
United Kingdom
Conservative Party
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
United Kingdom
Conservative and Unionist Party
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
United Kingdom
Conservative and Unionist Party
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
Groups
-
ECR
Member
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
2011/12/13 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
-
ECR
Co-treasurer
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
2011/03/09 - 2011/12/12
-
ECR
Member of the Bureau
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
2010/02/18 - 2011/03/08
-
ECR
Treasurer
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
2009/07/16 - 2010/02/17
-
ECR
Member
European Conservatives and Reformists Group
2009/07/14 - 2009/07/15
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
2004/07/20 - 2009/07/13
-
PPE-DE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats
1999/07/20 - 2004/07/19
EP staff
- Member of Conference of Delegation Chairs 2009/09/29 - 9999/12/31
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Transport and Tourism | 2012/02/02 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Budgetary Control | 2012/01/25 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chair of | Delegation for relations with Canada | 2009/09/29 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Afghanistan | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Canada | 2009/09/16 | 2009/09/28 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with South Africa | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Canada | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia | 2007/03/15 | 2009/07/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with the United States | 2004/09/15 | 2007/03/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with South Africa | 2004/10/13 | 2007/03/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with Canada | 2004/09/15 | 2007/03/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) | 2005/02/18 | 2007/03/13 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand | 2004/09/16 | 2004/10/12 |
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Canada | 2002/02/07 | 2004/07/19 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Malta Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2002/03/07 | 2004/04/30 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Slovenia Joint Parliamentary Committee | 1999/10/06 | 2002/01/14 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Malta Joint Parliamentary Committee | 1999/10/08 | 2002/01/14 |
Contact
Online
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45407
- Fax
- +322 28 49407
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 03F370
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75407
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79407
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T11032
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- European Parliament
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 03F370
- B-1047 Brussels
Rapporteur
| Shadow | 2013/2015(DEC) | Court of Auditors' special reports in the context of the 2011 Commission discharge |
| Shadow | 2013/0092(COD) | European Maritime Safety Agency: response to pollution caused by ships and to marine pollution caused by oil and gas installations, multiannual funding 2014-2020 |
| Shadow | 2012/2221(DEC) | 2011 discharge: ENIAC Joint Undertaking |
| Shadow | 2012/2220(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH Joint Undertaking) |
| Shadow | 2012/2219(DEC) | 2011 discharge: IMI Joint Undertaking for the implementation of the Joint Technology Initiative on Innovative Medicines |
| Shadow | 2012/2218(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Artemis Joint Undertaking to implement a Joint Technology Initiative in Embedded Computing Systems |
| Shadow | 2012/2217(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Clean Sky Joint Undertaking |
| Shadow | 2012/2216(DEC) | 2011 discharge: SESAR Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system |
| Shadow | 2012/2215(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Fusion for Energy) |
| Shadow | 2012/2214(DEC) | 2011 discharge: performance, financial management and control of EU agencies |
| Shadow | 2012/2212(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) |
| Shadow | 2012/2211(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) |
| Shadow | 2012/2210(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) |
| Shadow | 2012/2209(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2208(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2207(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Banking Authority (EBA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2206(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) |
| Shadow | 2012/2205(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Police Office (EUROPOL) |
| Shadow | 2012/2204(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2203(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2202(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFSA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2201(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European GNSS Agency (GSA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2200(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (FRONTEX) |
| Shadow | 2012/2199(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Police College (CEPOL) |
| Shadow | 2012/2198(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Railway Agency (ERA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2197(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2196(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2195(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
| Shadow | 2012/2194(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2193(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2192(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Training Foundation (ETF) |
| Shadow | 2012/2191(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (EUROJUST) |
| Shadow | 2012/2190(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Medicines Agency (EMA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2189(DEC) | 2011 discharge: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) |
| Shadow | 2012/2188(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2187(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Environment Agency (EEA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2186(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2185(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) |
| Shadow | 2012/2184(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND) |
| Shadow | 2012/2183(DEC) | 2011 discharge: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) |
| Shadow | 2012/2167(DEC) | 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission |
| Shadow | 2012/2086(DEC) | Special report 4/2012 (2011 discharge): Using Structural and Cohesion Funds to co-finance transport infrastructures in seaports: an effective investment? |
| Shadow | 2012/2067(INI) | Passenger rights in all transport modes |
| Shadow | 2012/0185(COD) | Registration documents for vehicles. 'Roadworthiness package' |
| Responsible | 2011/2196(INI) | Future of regional airports and air services in the EU |
| Shadow | 2011/2096(INI) | Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system |
| Shadow | 2011/0102(NLE) | EU/USA/Iceland/Norway Air Transport Agreement, and EU/Iceland/Norway Ancillary Agreement on the application of the Air Transport Agreement |
| Shadow | 2010/2235(INI) | European road safety 2011-2020 |
| Shadow | 2009/0156(NLE) | EC/Canada agreement: civil aviation safety |
| Shadow | 2009/0018(NLE) | EC/Canada agreement: air transport |
| Shadow | 2008/0145(NLE) | EU/West African Economic and Monetary Union agreement: air services |
| Opinion | 2007/2092(INI) | Airport capacity and groundhandling: towards a more efficient policy |
| Opinion | 2007/0243(COD) | Air transport services: Code of Conduct for computerised reservation systems (repeal. Regulation (EEC) No 2299/89) |
| Responsible | 2006/0281(COD) | Money laundering: prevention of the use of the financial system, including terrorism financing (amend. Directive 2005/60/EC, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission) |
| Shadow | 2006/0025(COD) | Fight against terrorisme: security in land freight transport, security in the land transport supply chain, introduction of a common "secure operator" scheme |
| Opinion | 2005/0235(CNS) | Air transport: Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system SESAR |
| Opinion | 2002/2038(COS) | Tourism sector: working together for a sustainable development and employment |
| Responsible | 2002/0038(COD) | Freight transport system: improving the environmental performance, programme Marco Polo PACT |
| Responsible | 2001/0229(COD) | Trans-European network of transport : Community guidelines of development (amend. Decision 1692/96/EC) |
| Opinion | 2001/0226(COD) | Trans-European networks: rules for granting financial aid (amend. Regulation (EC) No 2236/95) |
| Opinion | 2000/0212(COD) | Passenger transport by rail, road, inland waterway: competition, public service exigences and contracts (repeal. Regulations (EEC) No 1191/69 and (EEC) No 1107/70) |
| Opinion | 2000/0145(COD) | Air carriage: liability in the event of accidents (amend. Regulation (EC) No 2027/97) |
| Opinion | 1999/0252(COD) | Rail transport: interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system |
Born
1951/08/09 Tipton- Postgraduate Diploma in Municipal Administration (1972). Local government officer (1967-1970). Land charges and information officer (1970-1974). Research and information officer (1974-1987). Adviser to leader of the Conservative Group, Wolverhampton Metropolitan Borough Council (1987-1998).
- Member of Young Conservatives National Committee (1974-1979). Chairman, Conservative Political Centre, West Midlands Region (1988-1990). National Chairman, Conservative Political Centre (1990-1993). Regional Chairman, Conservative Party, West Midlands Region (1997-1999). Member of Conservative National Local Government Committee (1988-1998). Vice-Chairman, Democrat Youth Community of Europe (1979-1983). Member of European Communities Youth Forum (1979-1986).
- Member of the European Parliament (since 1999).
- OBE (1994).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 12 |
2008/0237(COD) Rights of passengers in bus and coach transport; cooperation between national authorities
2010/09/05
TRAN
12 amendments...
Amendment 42 #
Council position – amending act Recital 5 (5) Taking into account the specific characteristics of urban, suburban and regional regular services, Member States should be granted the right to exempt these types of transport from the application of
Amendment 48 #
Council position – amending act Recital 11 (11) In deciding on the design of new terminals, and as part of major refurbishments, terminal managing bodies should
Amendment 62 #
Council position – amending act Article 2 - paragraph 6 (6) For a maximum period of five years after the expiry of their authorisation, Member States may, on a transparent and non-discriminatory basis, exempt from the application of this Regulation particular regular services because a significant part of the regular service, including at least one scheduled stop, is operated outside the Union. Such exemptions may be renewed.
Amendment 64 #
Council position – amending act Article 2 - paragraph 8 (8) Nothing in this Regulation shall be understood
Amendment 77 #
Council position – amending act Article 8 In the event of an accident arising out of the use of the bus or coach, the carrier shall provide reasonable assistance with regard to the passengers' immediate practical needs following the accident.
Amendment 82 #
Council position – amending act Article 10 - paragraph 4 (4)
Amendment 84 #
Council position – amending act Article 13 - paragraph 1 (1) Subject to the access conditions provided for in Article 11(1),
Amendment 85 #
Council position – amending act Article 13 - paragraph 2 (2) Subject to the access conditions provided for in Article 11(1), carriers shall, on board buses and coaches, provide assistance free of charge to disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility a
Amendment 88 #
Council position – amending act Article 16 - paragraph 2 (2) A
Amendment 97 #
Council position – amending act Article 22 a (new) Article 22a Carriers shall cooperate in order to adopt arrangements at national or European level with the involvement of stakeholders, professional associations and associations of customers, passengers and disabled persons.
Amendment 102 #
Council position – amending act Article 25 Carriers shall set up or have in place a complaint handling mechanism for the rights and obligations set out in Articles 4, 8, 9 and
Amendment 105 #
Council position – amending act Article 33 This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It shall apply
source: PE-441.262
|
| 2 |
2008/0246(COD) Rights of passengers when travelling by sea and inland waterway; coordination between national authorities (amend. Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004)
2010/11/05
TRAN
2 amendments...
Amendment 98 #
Council position – amending act Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) where the design, medical or other care facilities of the passenger ship or
Amendment 107 #
Council position – amending act Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) In relation to cruise ships, disabled persons or persons with reduced mobility shall notify the carrier of their specific needs at the time of reservation or advance purchase.
source: PE-441.013
|
| 9 |
2009/2154(INI) Penalties for serious infringements against the social rules in road transport
2010/07/04
TRAN
9 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Regrets that some Member States do not provide for differentiation of penalties according to the seriousness of the infringement; calls on the Member States to adopt national legislation that
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Takes the view that to achieve further approximation of the types of penalties and of the levels of fines Member States should set out, minimum and maximum penalties for each infringement against the social rules in road transport should be laid down;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the fact that pursuant to Article 22(4) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 the Commission has prepared 'guidelines' to support the Member States in the national interpretation and application of this Regulation; notes, however, that the guidelines are not legally binding
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Member States to establish an appropriate infrastructure on the European road network so that drivers can in fact comply with the provisions on driving times and rest periods
source: PE-440.037
|
| 1 |
2009/2232(INI) Transparency in regional policy and its funding
2010/03/29
REGI
1 amendments...
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for the timely publication of online information, including direct access to project documentation (application, feasibility study, cost-benefit analysis, environmental impact assessment, etc.) on major projects, as soon as possible after the Commission receives an application for funding from a Member State and before it takes any decision on financing; this Commission webpage should allow the submission of comments regarding such projects; this Commission webpage should also publish comments regarding organisations/companies who lobby for money for EU-funded projects;
source: PE-440.029
|
| 6 |
2010/2154(INI) Aviation security with a special focus on security scanners
2011/03/22
TRAN
6 amendments...
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Takes the view that exposure to doses of ionising radiation above the recommended annual limits cannot be acceptable
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Stresses that images
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Takes the view that the operating rules must ensure that people are not selected to pass through a security scanner on the basis of discriminatory criteria, though believes some form of passenger profiling is essential in selecting subjects for further scrutiny;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Takes the view that, when images are used, they should not be linked to the passenger's identity and measures should be taken to ensure that passengers cannot be identified with images of any part of the body
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls on the Commission to propose that special training that takes into account the impact on personal dignity, health and the protection of personal data be provided for security staff responsible for using security scanners, and that the penalty for misuse of such data shall be criminal prosecution;
source: PE-460.986
|
| 7 |
2011/0023(COD) Fight against terrorism and serious crime: use of passenger name record (PNR) data
2011/09/15
TRAN
7 amendments...
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) PNR data enable law enforcement authorities to identify persons who were previously ‘unknown’, i.e. persons previously unsuspected of involvement in the most serious crime and terrorism, but whom an analysis of the data suggests may be involved in such crime and who should therefore be subject to further examination by the competent authorities. By using PNR data law enforcement authorities can address the threat of the most serious crime and terrorism from a different perspective than through the processing of other categories of personal data. However, in order to ensure that the processing of data of innocent and unsuspected persons remains as limited as possible, the aspects of the use of PNR data relating to the creation and application of assessment criteria should be further limited to the most serious crimes that are also transnational in nature, i.e. are intrinsically linked to travelling and hence the type of the data being processed.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 (32) In particular, the scope of the Directive is as limited as possible, it allows retention of PNR data for period of time not exceeding 5 years, after which the data must be deleted, the data must be anonymised after
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) The prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and the most serious crime according to Article 4(2)(b) and (c); and
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The PNR data collected in accordance with this Directive may not be processed for minor offences which are punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of less than three years under the national law of a Member State.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) ‘most serious crime’ means the offences under national law referred to in Article 2(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA if they are punishable by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least three years under the national law of a Member State, however, Member States
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States shall not require air carriers to collect any PNR data that they do not already collect. Air carriers shall not transfer any PNR data other than that defined in Article 2(c) and specified by the Annex. Air carriers shall take every reasonable precaution to ensure that the data collected from passengers is accurate and correct; where this is found not to be the case, the air carrier can be held liable.
source: PE-472.208
|
| 6 |
2011/0196(COD) Road transport: tachograph system
2012/03/29
TRAN
6 amendments...
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 Article 1a Member States may decide not to equip their control authorities with the remote early detection equipment needed to request the data communication referred to in this Article as this equipment is not part of the mandatory control equipment lists in the Directive 2006/22/EC.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 Article 19 – paragraph 4 4. Member States and their competent authorities shall take appropriate measures to prevent conflicts of interests between fitters or workshops and road transport undertakings. In particular, i
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 Article 27 Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 Article 37 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall, in accordance with national constitutional arrangements, lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. Those penalties shall be effective, proportionate, dissuasive and non-discriminatory
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 Article 37 – paragraph 2 Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – point 1 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 Article 37 – paragraph 3 source: PE-485.915
|
| 32 |
2011/0294(COD) Trans-European transport network: guidelines
2012/04/10
TRAN
16 amendments...
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the full implementation and smooth functioning of the Sin
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The comprehensive network should be a European-wide transport network ensuring the accessibility of all regions in the Union, including the remote and outermost regions, as also pursued by the Integrated Maritime Policy, and strengthening cohesion between them. The guidelines should set the requirements for the infrastructure of the comprehensive network, in order to
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The core network should be identified and
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) In order to maximise consistency between the guidelines and the programming of the relevant financial instruments available at Union level, trans- European transport network funding should be based on this Regulation and draw on the Connecting Europe Facility. Correspondingly, it should aim at aligning and combining funding from relevant internal and external instruments such as structural and cohesion funds, the Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF), the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), and from financing from the European Investment Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and other financial institutions.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. The guidelines provide for measures for the implementation of the trans-European network. The implementation of projects of common interest depends on their degree of maturity, the compliance with national and EU legal procedures and the availability of financial resources, without prejudging the financial commitment of a Member State or the Union.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ‘project of common interest’ means any p
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) 'Interoperability for systems' is the capacity of systems and the underlying business processes to exchange data and to share information and knowledge;
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q (q) ‘freight terminal’ means a structure equipped for transhipment between at least two transport modes or between two different rail systems and for temporary storage of freight such as ports, inland ports, airports and rail-road terminals;
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q a (new) (q a) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge which is different to that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435mm), for which certain major infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms by virtue of the specificities of that network arising from its geographic detachment or peripheral location;
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks,
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) promoting
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point i Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c source: PE-494.841
2012/08/10
TRAN
16 amendments...
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. High-quality roads shall be
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b – introductory part (b) An express road is a
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b – point ii (ii) does not cross at
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b – point ii – point a (new) a) A conventional strategic road is an all purpose road which is not a motorway or express road, but which is still a high quality road as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 4 4. Equipment associated with roads
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 576 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 Amendment 595 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.
Amendment 604 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Without prejudice to Directive 2008/57/EC, at the request of a Member State, as regards railway transport infrastructure, exemptions may be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as regards the train length, ERTMS, axle load, electrification and line speed. At the request of a Member State, as regards road transport infrastructure, exemptions from the provisions of Article 20(3)(a) or (b) may be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as long as an appropriate level of safety is ensured. The duly justified cases referred to in this paragraph shall include cases where infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms.
Amendment 645 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to Articles 1(4), 47(2) and (3),
Amendment 681 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 692 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 4 4. The European Coordinator shall act in the name and on behalf of the Commission. The remit of the European Coordinator shall relate to a single core network corridor, or part therein, as agreed in each case with the Member States. The European Coordinator shall draw up together with the agreement of the Member States concerned a work plan for the activities to be fulfilled.
Amendment 708 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 1 Amendment 720 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.
source: PE-494.842
|
| 12 |
2011/0302(COD) Connecting Europe Facility
2012/10/10
TRAN, ITRE
12 amendments...
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The European Parliament in its Resolution of 6 July 2010 on a sustainable future for transport emphasised that an efficient transport policy required a financial framework that was appropriate to the challenges arising
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘transport bottleneck’ means a physical barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) actions implementing the comprehensive network according to Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines] when such actions contribute to facilitating cross-border traffic flows or removing bottlenecks and when these actions also contribute to the development of the core network, up to a ceiling of 5% of the financial envelope for transport as specified in Article 5 of this Regulation.
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 5. The agreement of Member States concerned by the action shall accompany all proposals for grants except in the field of telecommunications
Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (ii a) for actions to support cross-border road sections, 10% of the eligible cost;
Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) Road projects which aim to remove bottlenecks on the TEN-T, financial aid shall not exceed 10% of the eligible costs.
Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 4. Before the Commission takes any of the decisions provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, it shall examine the case at hand and inform the beneficiaries concerned so that they may present their observations within a given timeframe. It shall inform the European Parliament and the Council of all the decisions taken on the annual adoption of the programmes under Article 17.
Amendment 535 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. Actions supported by means of financial instruments shall
Amendment 539 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. The financial instruments shall aim to preserve the value of assets provided by the Union budget. They may generate acceptable returns
Amendment 563 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 Amendment 587 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall implement information and communication actions on the Connecting Europe Facility projects and results.
source: PE-496.337
|
| 1 |
2011/0455(COD) Staff Regulations of European Union officials: amendment of the Regulations
2012/06/03
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point (ba) (new) Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union Article 45 – paragraph 2 – first sentence (ba) In the first sentence of paragraph 2 the following words shall be added after the word 'Treaty': "unless, at the time of his appointment and in accordance with article 28(f), he was already able to demonstrate his ability to work in two of the working languages of the European Union."
source: PE-483.645
|
| 15 |
2011/2096(INI) Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system
2011/09/21
ITRE
15 amendments...
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 1 – that
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Approves the goals set in the White Paper for 2050, but considers that more specific provisions are required for the period until 2020 with regard to funding – in view of the economic situation of individual Member States – and the general challenges facing transport in the field of energy and the environment, and therefore calls on the Commission to
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 1 a (new) - revision of the TEN-T program should support diversification and the connectivity between priority corridors and their populations with particular regard to the easing of bottle-necks without discriminating against any specific modes of transport;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 3 Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 5 a (new) - further development of secure coach and lorry parking facilities across the TEN-T network should be a priority within the programme;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 (new) Accepts, however, that not only is it not within the EU’s competence, but it is both unrealistic and undesirable for the EU to try to enforce a phase out of conventionally fuelled cars from city centres by 2050;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 2 – creating intelligent, interoperational and linked systems
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 – social regulation on road transport to be amended to allow more flexibility whilst maintaining a safe approach to drivers rest hours; calls for another review of the rules on driving and rest times for passenger and goods transport, and the implementation thereof, by 2014
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 a (new) - the Working Time Directive for mobile workers to be clarified, especially in its definition of duty-time and time not spent specifically in control of a vehicle;
Amendment 389 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 2 – a
Amendment 393 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 – the independence and strengthening of national regulatory authorities, in the interest of more efficient railways
source: PE-472.267
|
| 1 |
2011/2150(INI) Functioning and application of established rights of people travelling by air
2012/01/16
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 – indent 1 (new) - Insists that a ‘full service’ airline providing flight catering to passengers may not discriminate against passengers requiring special meals due to pre- existing medical conditions (e.g. Coeliacs, diabetes etc.) and that such special meals be provided at no extra cost to the passenger in all cases of travel.
source: PE-480.549
|
| 24 |
2011/2201(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section III, Commission
2012/07/03
CONT
24 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision 3 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision 4 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision 5 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision 6 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision 7 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision 8 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Underlines that the two policy areas prone to the highest error rates (‘Cohesion, transport and energy’ and ‘Agriculture and natural resources’) are implemented under shared management and
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 63 63. Notes that the Court of Auditors applies a common methodology to categorise and quantify public procurement errors in the area of shared management; deplores the fact that the Commission does not follow a harmonised methodology in the different areas of shared management; is worried that different approaches in shared management could undermine the credibility of the control and audit of shared management expenditure; calls therefore on the Commission and the Court of Auditors to harmonise the treatment of public procurement errors in all shared management policy areas urgently and to report back to the Parliament's competent committee on the progress made by the end of 2012;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution New subheading after "Specific issues" heading The role of the Commissioner responsible for budgetary control issues
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph - 64 a (new) - 64a. Notes that in the 2004-2009 Commission, a Commissioner had full- time responsibility for budgetary control as had previously been called for by Parliament; regrets the fact that within the current Commission budgetary control issues have been merged with other responsibilities ('taxation and customs union'); proposes that in the 2014-2019 Commission a full-time Commissioner for Budgetary Control be re-established with responsibility for matters related, inter alia, to the following areas: - internal audit, - anti-fraud, - liaison with the Court of Auditors and the relevant committee of Parliament; - contact with the relevant budgetary and audit authorities in the member states, and the development of a comprehensive internal control framework, - overseeing and improving the utility of the annual synthesis report, including a review of the Member States' management and control systems, - commissioning and assessing independent programme evaluations, and developing the Evaluation Report, provided for by Article 318 of the TFEU, into a valuable tool for performance improvement;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 66 66. Takes the view that those important findings illustrate that Parliament cannot fully rely on the Commission's reporting on performance
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 f (new) 72f. Emphasises the vital role transparency plays in ensuring accountability for the use of public funds; Reiterates its call for all grant payments from Union funds to be recorded in a user-friendly online database; believes that the payment of Union funds should be explicitly conditional on the acceptance by the beneficiaries that the basic details - including the amount, recipient's name, and purpose - be a matter of public record;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 g (new) 72g. Requests that the Commission submit to Parliament's competent committee by September 2012 a report on its activities to promote whistle-blowing both amongst its staff and the wider public;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 h (new) 72h. Reiterates its call for the Commission to review the briefing and training given to staff regarding 'Title II: Rights and Obligations of officials' of the Staff Regulation so as to ensure that all staff are fully conversant with its terms and particularly with the obligations under Article 22a of the Staff Regulations;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 73 73.
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 78.
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 82 82. Believes that payments are resumed too quickly and calls on the Commission to make this power of sanction more effective by only resum
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 88 – indent 3 a (new) - ensuring that a full range of sanctions (interruptions, suspensions, financial corrections, and penalties) are available for all funds with minimal scope for discretion when breaches of the rules are discovered;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 88 – indent 4 –
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 112 112. Notes that the Commission is simplifying ex ante control procedures as far as possible with a view to facilitate the processing of payments with the consequence that only administrative requirements and arithmetical checks can be made; is worried that even in the case of doubt about the eligibility of cost declared, only limited ex ante checks were carried out (Annual Report, point 6.17 and example 6.2); insists that action be taken to remedy this situation;
source: PE-483.775
|
| 26 |
2011/2202(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Section I - European Parliament
2012/06/03
CONT
26 amendments...
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the year saw consolidation and further modernisation of the administration, with a stronger focus on core activities, restructuring of services, better use of modern technologies and increased interinstitutional cooperation
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that this overall high level of implementation is partly due to two targeted transfers made before the end of the financial year 2010 (EUR 9 240 000 for the purchase of a Europe House in Sofia and EUR 10 923 000 for four major IT projects); welcomes the fact that no mopping-up transfers took place between 2010 and 2011; encourages, however, its administration to pursue the objective of better and clearer budget planning and discipline in the future and notes that to put buildings, IT or any other important expenditure in the budget would provide more financial clarity; believes that all significant expenditure should be fully planned for in the annual budget and not arise as a result of a need to mop-up underspends;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35a. Insists that reinforcing the security of Parliament's buildings and their immediate surroundings must be given the highest priority; requests that as part of this work security in the car parks should be improved, and that the access to Members' offices in Parliament should be controlled;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39a. Notes that the communications budget consists of three main strands: 'legislative', 'values' and 'elections'; believes that the public will be better able to come to a view about the importance of voting with reference to real issues; proposes that in the run-up to the 2014 European elections all possible resources should be diverted to the 'legislative' strand so that the public might be given the maximum information about the actual work of Members of the European Parliament;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41. Welcomes the opening of the Visitors' Centre on 14 October 2011 (originally planned for the 2009 European elections); deplores however the considerable delay and cost overrun of this project; calls for a review of the Visitors' Centre to take place once it has been operational for a twelve month period in order to assess the public reaction, its strengths/weaknesses, and its cost/benefits with a view to ensuring it is delivering value for money;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 d (new) 42d. Believes that Parliament should not be in the business of running museums; proposes that if this House of European History is established it be made an independent body with full responsibility for its activities and resources;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 e (new) 42e. Believes that the House of European History project should be put on hold, especially given the current economic and financial climate;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Regrets that EuroparlTV cannot be considered to be a success story in view of its very low number of direct individual users (excluding viewers through partnership agreements with regional TVs) in spite of the considerable financing that it received in 2010, amounting to some EUR 9 000 000 (item 3 2 4 6); welcomes the efforts made to reduce this budget by 14 % (to EUR 8 000 000) in 2011 and in the subsequent years;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Notes that the costs relating to the LUX Prize in 2010 were EUR 380 666,18; is concerned that the costs rose for the event in 2011 to EUR 573 722,08 (by over 50 %) and looks forward to a sharp reverse in this trend from 2012 onwards; specifically requests that the following activities be curtailed in order to contain costs: - expensive internal promotion within the buildings of Parliament, - promotional activities at international film festivals, - the large expenditure associated with the costs of organising 'mini-LUX' events in the Member States;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 a (new) 45a. Notes the expenditure of the prizes for the period 2009-11: 2009 2010 2011 Journalists prize €105 000 €118 059 €154 205 Sakharov Prize €300 000 €645 542 €652 348 Charlemagne Youth €24 000 €34 000 €35 000 Prize LUX prize €320 000 €380 666 €573 722 Totals: €749 000 €1 178 267 €1 415 276
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 b (new) 45b. Believes that the 89 % increase in the expenditure on the prizes between 2009 and 2011 used funds that could have been better deployed elsewhere; calls for future expenditure on prizes to be brought back down to the levels of 2009;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 c (new) 45c. Calls on the Bureau to cancel the LUX prize on the grounds that Parliament is a political not a cultural institution and so is not an appropriate body to judge creative activities such as art, books, music, or films;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 c (new) 47c. Believes that there is an inherent contradiction between having a highly centralised communications strategy and budget as well as a large expenditure on the buildings and staff of the information offices in the Member States; proposes consideration be given to two options to end this contradiction: 1) a substantial reduction in the number/costs of the information offices; or 2) a substantial decentralisation of the communications budget to the information offices, under the supervision of a cross-party panel of local members in each Member State, in order to be well adapted to the diverse information needs of the public and to be more closely in touch with the national political and media situation;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Notes the opening in April 2010 of the EP Liaison Office (EPLO) in Washington and the system of one-year missions for four officials put in place in October 2010; observes that, although the creation of the Washington Office has not entailed the creation of any new posts, other costs have inevitably been incurred; calls for a review of its structure, activities and costs to be presented to the Bureau with copies to the relevant competent committees;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 a (new) 51a. Notes that staff numbers have increased dramatically over recent years; calls for staff numbers to be immediately frozen at their current levels and subsequently reviewed to identify where reductions can be made;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 54. Points to the difficulties in recruiting officials or agents from certain Member States such as Germany, the UK, Austria or the Netherlands for which the proportion of staff in Parliament's Secretariat is significantly lower than the ‘demographic weight’ of the given country within the Union and observes the relatively high numbers of staff of holding the nationality of Belgium (13,6 %) or Luxemburg (2,3 %), as a result of the working places of Parliament; asks the Bureau to review recruitment procedures and requirements to ascertain what part they may play in creating difficulties to recruit staff from these Member States;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 55 55. Notes that, in 2010, there were 33 200 missions (official trips) representing a total of 98 629 mission days, most of them involving travel between Parliament's three places of work; reiterates the need to avoid unnecessary missions between the three working places and the costs they entail with more systematic and documentary justifications and better monitoring; requests that the Secretary General report, as part of the discharge procedure, on any savings made as a result of further rationalisation; asks the Secretary-General specifically to review the posts based outside of Brussels, particularly for those staff members who undertake repeated missions to Brussels, to ascertain if they need to be relocated; suggests that the agreement with the Luxembourg authorities, which fixes the number of Parliament staff based in Luxembourg without regard to any evolving needs of Parliament, may need to be revised;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 a (new) 57a. Notes that the European Council, whilst justifiably calling for austerity on the part of Parliament, continues to deny it the opportunity to make the considerable savings that would arise from ceasing to hold meetings in Strasbourg;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 63 a (new) 63a. Notes that the property portfolio of Parliament has substantially increased over recent years; insists that no additional buildings be purchased or leased during the next multiannual financial framework period;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 64 c (new) 64c. Notes the decision to purchase the Trebel building which will become available in 2017; proposes however that no further building(s) be leased to substitute for this building during the redevelopment project even if this means that refurbishments and non-urgent maintenance on existing buildings must be delayed until its completion;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 64 f (new) 64f. Reiterates its call for more diverse catering options within the buildings of Parliament by ceasing to offer a monopoly to a single catering provider when current contracts reach the end of their term;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 70 70. Notes that final appropriations for the Travel Agency amounted to EUR 1 438 000 in 2010, with a high commitment rate (94 %); further notes that it obtains negotiated prices from airlines, which means that there is an average price for the best service; stresses however that this does not mean that, for a specific day or journey, it is not possible to get better prices by booking directly with travel operators; calls on the existing travel agent contractor to make better efforts to ensure that the cheapest options are always proposed to Members and staff; further calls on the appropriate directorate to monitor service levels provided by the Travel Agency and whether this represents value for money and to report back to the appropriate parliamentary committee by the end of 2012;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 70 a (new) 70a. Believes that Parliament should cease awarding monopolistic contracts wherever possible and that reduced costs and a better service for Members and staff would result from having more than one travel agency at their disposal;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 75 75. Notes the Bureau decisions of 17 June 2009 and of 18 October 2010 to extend the areas with wireless network access (Wi-Fi) in Parliament covering the Chamber, committee rooms, Members' offices and public spaces both in Brussels and Strasbourg but expresses concern at the high cost of this project (1st phase of the project: EUR 7 878 000);
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 87 d (new) 87d. Suggests to the Bureau that it should put on its agenda a discussion on the discharge resolution following its adoption by plenary;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 87 e (new) 87e. Reiterates its call for the Bureau to issue 'green papers' to all Members on key policy areas regarding matters within its competence before taking any definitive decisions in order to stimulate a wider debate within political groups and the house as a whole;
source: PE-483.679
|
| 7 |
2011/2205(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Auditors
2012/07/03
CONT
7 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Also notes that the Court of Auditors undertook a total of 376 audit missions – 351 to Member States and 25 elsewhere (France: 52, Germany: 38, United Kingdom: 32, Italy: 30; Spain: 26, Netherlands: 23, Sweden: 15, Portugal: 14, Greece: 13, Denmark: 12; Luxembourg: 11, Hungary: 10, Poland: 10) and that just less than half of the Member States were therefore visited;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Asks the Court of Auditors, whilst recognising resource limitations and the reality of a sampling methodology, to seek to ensure it covers all Member States over a relatively short time frame;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Calls on the Court of Auditors to publish Annual Reports on each Member State when possible, to bring together all their research across different programme areas related to a single Member State;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Notes that a traditional sampling method works best when auditing a single programme and a single management & control system but when both the selection of transactions/procedures and the selection of Member States is part of the sampling process it is harder to establish a clear understanding of the situation; requests that the Court of Auditors think in terms of occasional 'matrix' audits which sample transactions within a programme but cover all 27 Member States in order to reach conclusions about both the programme and the individual Member States;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 d (new) 12d. Suggests that as part of any review of the Court of Auditors' operations, consideration be given to allocating to Court Members, responsibilities for specific Member States in addition to their programme responsibilities; notes that this would give Members of the Court of Auditors the opportunity to develop closer relationships with national/regional audit authorities, and locally-appointed auditors for specific programmes;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 e (new) 12e. Considers that if a Member State and relevant sub-national authorities do not take their auditing and control responsibilities under shared management sufficiently seriously the Court of Auditors may have to be more involved on decentralised basis, whilst recognising that at present it would not have the resources to do so;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 f (new) 12f. Requests the Court of Auditors to incorporate into its future work programmes a systematic follow-up of specific past audits, following a sufficient time lapse, to assess progress;
source: PE-483.638
|
| 3 |
2011/2206(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Economic and Social Committee
2012/07/03
CONT
3 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the EESC, as a body designed to offer privileged access to the Union's legislative and policy-making processes, to fund its activities by means of subscription for those few bodies that have secured representation;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Reiterates the call made in its resolution1 on discharge to the EESC for the financial year 2009 to undertake with urgency a comprehensive spending review of all areas of activity to ensure all expenditure is delivering value for money in order to identify savings which will reduce the pressure on the budget in this period of austerity; calls on the EESC to adopt the principle of zero-based budgeting to identify savings, rather than simply adding a nominal percentage increase for inflation to existing budgets during each budget cycle; 1 OJ L 250, 27.9.2011, p.98.
source: PE-483.639
|
| 4 |
2011/2207(DEC) 2010 discharge: EU general budget, Committee of the Regions
2012/07/03
CONT
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Committee of the Regions (CoR), as a body designed to offer a relatively small number of bodies privileged access to the Union's legislative and policy-making processes, to fund its activities by means of subscription for those local and regional institutions that believe it serves a valuable purpose;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the CoR to undertake a comprehensive spending review based on the principle of zero-based budgeting to identify savings, rather than simply adding a nominal percentage increase for inflation to existing budgets during each budget cycle;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union highlights the importance of the subsidiarity principle
source: PE-483.640
|
| 3 |
2012/0082(COD) Single Market: simplifying the transfer of motor vehicles registered in another Member State
2012/10/23
TRAN
3 amendments...
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Where the holder of the registration certificate moves his normal residence to another Member State, he shall request registration of a vehicle registered in another Member State within a period of
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 5 5. Where a vehicle registered in
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d – introductory part (d) where the information gathered in accordance with Article 7
source: PE-497.805
|
| 8 |
2012/0184(COD) Periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers. 'Roadworthiness package'
2013/03/28
TRAN
8 amendments...
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 5 Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – Vehicles of category M1, N1
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 – indent 2 Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 4 – indent 3 Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. For the purposes of checking the odometer reading, where fitted, and where this information was not communicated electronically following the previous roadworthiness test, the inspector shall require the person presenting the vehicle to the test to show the certificate issued following the previous roadworthiness test.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 It shall
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 source: PE-507.994
|
| 2 |
2012/0185(COD) Registration documents for vehicles. 'Roadworthiness package'
2013/03/28
TRAN
2 amendments...
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 3 source: PE-506.044
|
| 1 |
2012/2067(INI) Passenger rights in all transport modes
2012/04/06
TRAN
1 amendments...
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. Calls for specific facilities for severely disabled passengers requiring changing and toilet facilities (so called 'changing places') to be provided at no cost to the passenger at all EU airports with an annual passenger throughput of more than 1,000,000.
source: PE-492.578
|
| 2 |
2012/2166(DEC) 2011 discharge: 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Funds (EDF)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 2 2.
source: PE-497.959
|
| 10 |
2012/2168(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Parliament
2013/02/27
CONT
10 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Bureau to schedule as a specific agenda item a discussion of the discharge report in May or June, shortly after its adoption by plenary;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Reiterates its proposal that the Bureau should circulate more 'White Papers' on policy items of general interest to all Members so they can be thoroughly discussed within political groups prior to a final decision being taken;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 a (new) 39 a. Notes that 192 members of staff report to the Directors General without going through a Director; asks the Secretary-General to review this situation to ensure that 'cabinets' for Directors- General are not being created unofficially; asks the Secretary-General to include in the review an assessment of the grades, powers and responsibilities of these staff;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Takes note of the fact that the contract with the current travel agency expires on 31 December 2013 and that the preparations of a new call for tenders have started; regrets that, while the possibility of a financial audit was provided for in the contract, this is not the case for an audit of the structure and performance of the travel agency; insists that a future contract should include the possibility of intermediary and final financial and performance audits; as requested by the Committee on Budgetary Control, welcomes the fact that the administration will also have recourse to external expertise when establishing tender documentation and throughout the selection procedure, thereby ensuring that Parliament chooses the best solution, resulting in major simplifications and cost- savings; stresses that the new contract should take into account the best quality/price ratio and the best value for money with competitive prices; reiterates its proposal for exploring the possibility of having two travel agencies operating within Parliament, in direct competition, and whether this might provide a cost- neutral way of increasing efficiency and achieving best value for money;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Regrets that the audience of Europarl TV, although greater in 2011 as compared with 2010
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 46 46. Is concerned at the increased cost of the Lux Prize in 2011
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Notes that a business plan for the House of European History in Brussels was approved by the Bureau on 26 September 2011
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 a (new) 50a. Insists that the time has finally come to end all subsidies to the catering service, as it is no longer tenable that officials and staff pay anything other than market prices; expects to this end that catering services will be required to be self- sufficient; reiterates its suggestion that the possibility be explored for the existence of two or more service providers, in direct competition, so as to encourage increased quality of service and best value for money;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 52. Points out that any property and buildings strategy must also take account of the rising costs of maintaining the buildings purchased; suggests that the current buildings strategy should be urgently re-examined, with a view to halting all expansion;
source: PE-506.000
|
| 1 |
2012/2169(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Council
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.055
|
| 1 |
2012/2170(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Justice
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.049
|
| 1 |
2012/2171(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Court of Auditors
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.046
|
| 2 |
2012/2172(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Economic and Social Committee
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the EESC, as an institution designed to offer privileged access to the Union's legislative and policy-making processes, to fund its activities by means of subscription for those few bodies that have secured representation;
source: PE-506.052
|
| 2 |
2012/2173(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, Committee of the Regions
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Committee, as an institution designed to offer a relatively small number of bodies privileged access to the Union's legislative and policy- making processes, to fund its activities by means of subscription for those local and regional institutions that believe it serves a valuable purpose;
source: PE-506.054
|
| 1 |
2012/2174(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Ombudsman
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.050
|
| 1 |
2012/2175(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.053
|
| 1 |
2012/2176(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European External Action Service
2013/02/26
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.047
|
| 2 |
2012/2183(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.867
|
| 2 |
2012/2184(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.844
|
| 4 |
2012/2185(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)
2013/02/27
CONT
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is concerned by the fact that in December 2012, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) opened an investigation into alleged irregularities in the Agency as a result of allegations made by one of the applicants in the above-mentioned court cases; requ
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Is convinced that merger of the European Institute for Gender Equality and the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights should be urgently considered in order to avoid duplication of tasks and to reduce overhead costs;
source: PE-497.850
|
| 3 |
2012/2187(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Environment Agency (EEA)
2013/02/27
CONT
3 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes from the Court of Auditors' report that the Agency made a payment to an international environmental organisation amounting to EUR 6 061 which was related to the participation of Agency staff in expeditions organised by that organisation in February and May 2011;
source: PE-497.873
|
| 2 |
2012/2188(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.840
|
| 2 |
2012/2189(DEC) 2011 discharge: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT)
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.866
|
| 2 |
2012/2190(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Medicines Agency (EMA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.879
|
| 2 |
2012/2191(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (EUROJUST)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.846
|
| 2 |
2012/2192(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Training Foundation (ETF)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.838
|
| 5 |
2012/2193(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA)
2013/02/27
CONT
5 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes with concern the Court of Auditors' finding that budget commitments amounting to EUR 0,9 million were not related to existing legal commitments and the Agency should have decommitted and paid back the amount to the Commission at the beginning of 2012; notes, however, that the Agency initiated the process too late and as a result, due to restrictions imposed by the IT system, the funds will be blocked for one year and will only be decommitted and paid back at the end of 2012; considers that this is unacceptable;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Regrets that the Court of Auditors identified the need to improve the Agency's asset management; it found, in particular, unexplained differences between the recorded annual and cumulated depreciation and that for internally created intangible assets, accounting procedures and information on costs were not reliable; notes that evidence of a physical inventory of administrative equipment within the required period was lacking; remarks that until the serious problems in the Agency are resolved no further extension of the Agency's competency should be considered;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes with concern the Court of Auditors' finding that when the Agency sold two sets of sweeping arms systems for at-sea oil recovery services in December 2011, aiming to obtain at least the equipment's net book value of EUR 319 050 , as a result of the minimum price being wrongly set below net book value, the equipment was sold at a loss of EUR 93 950; considers that this is unacceptable and shows lack of regard for taxpayers money;
source: PE-497.881
|
| 6 |
2012/2194(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
2013/02/27
CONT
6 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges from the Court of Auditors' report that the decrease in the country coefficient for Germany in June 2010 caused a significant surplus in the Agency's Title I ‘Staff Expenditure’ appropriations for 2011 and that about EUR 3 million (7 % of the appropriations) were transferred from Title I to various budget lines in Title III ‘Operational Expenditure’, despite their low implementation rate in terms of payments; notes, moreover, that this significant cross title transfer, which changed the structure of the budget considerably, was not put to the Agency's Management Board for approval;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes note that the transfer increased Title III appropriations to EUR 13,7 million and that at the end of 2011, EUR 7,8 million was carried over to 2012;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Remarks that the budgetary authority is concerned by the high administrative costs at the Agency and is strongly dissatisfied with the answers regarding them that were given by the Executive Director of the Agency in the hearing of the Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control because they did not adequately address members' questions;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 – subparagraph 2 source: PE-497.869
|
| 4 |
2012/2195(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
2013/02/27
CONT
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
source: PE-497.871
|
| 4 |
2012/2196(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
2013/02/27
CONT
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes, from the Court of Auditors' report and the Authority's annual activity report (AAR), that in 2011, 13 budgetary transfers were made; notes that, in particular, EUR 2,46 million was transferred from Title I to the infrastructure and IT budget lines of Title II, aiming to provide the resources for the adaptation of IT systems and financial systems related to the reorganisation and the migration to the accrual-based accounting financial system, and to reinforce the resources available for the move to the final seat and equipment for the final seat; notes, moreover, that transfers were carried out within Titles II and III;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes with concern that the Authority was criticised for a lack of transparency with respect to the publication of annual declarations of interest and the absence of training on conflicts of interest and demands that this matter be remedied forthwith;
source: PE-497.875
|
| 2 |
2012/2197(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.882
|
| 4 |
2012/2198(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Railway Agency (ERA)
2013/02/27
CONT
4 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges that the level of payments against budget appropriations improved for all titles, but remained low for Title III with 47 % (39 % in 2010);
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates that using two locations (Lille and Valenciennes) to carry out its activities exposes the Agency to additional costs; for this reason one location should be urgently reconsidered; notes, moreover, that this observation has been made since 2006 and that no action has been taken by the Council to change the Decision of 13 December 2003
source: PE-497.883
|
| 2 |
2012/2199(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Police College (CEPOL)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.868
|
| 2 |
2012/2200(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (FRONTEX)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.852
|
| 2 |
2012/2201(DEC) 2011 discharge: European GNSS Agency (GSA)
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.854
|
| 2 |
2012/2202(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFSA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.874
|
| 2 |
2012/2204(DEC) 2011 discharge: Euratom Supply Agency (ESA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.842
|
| 5 |
2012/2205(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Police Office (EUROPOL)
2013/02/27
CONT
5 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges from the Court of Auditors' report that in 2010, more than EUR 1,6 million had to be cancelled and in 2011, EUR 1,9 million (9 % of the appropriations carried over from 2010) were cancelled; notes, moreover, that in 2011 the level of carry-overs of commitment appropriations was also high, with EUR 4,2 million (41 %) for Title II ‘administrative expenditure’ and EUR 10,6 million (46 %) for Title III ‘operational expenditure’;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Acknowledges from the Court of Auditors' report that weaknesses were found as regards the physical verification and recording of assets before and after the move to the new headquarters; in addition,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 source: PE-497.848
|
| 2 |
2012/2206(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.876
|
| 3 |
2012/2207(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Banking Authority (EBA)
2013/02/27
CONT
3 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Notes from the Court of Auditors that weaknesses as regards three legal commitments made in advance of budget commitments (EUR 742 000) were noted;
source: PE-497.870
|
| 2 |
2012/2208(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA)
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.877
|
| 2 |
2012/2209(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.885
|
| 2 |
2012/2210(DEC) 2011 discharge: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.864
|
| 2 |
2012/2211(DEC) 2011 discharge: Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC)
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.865
|
| 2 |
2012/2212(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
2013/02/26
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-497.878
|
| 1 |
2012/2214(DEC) 2011 discharge: performance, financial management and control of EU agencies
2013/02/27
CONT
1 amendments...
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Urges the Agencies to examine their internal administrative processes with a view to reducing administrative costs, which are generally too high across the Agencies;
source: PE-497.863
|
| 2 |
2012/2215(DEC) 2011 discharge: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Fusion for Energy)
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.003
|
| 2 |
2012/2216(DEC) 2011 discharge: SESAR Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.005
|
| 2 |
2012/2219(DEC) 2011 discharge: IMI Joint Undertaking for the implementation of the Joint Technology Initiative on Innovative Medicines
2013/02/27
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
source: PE-506.006
|
Philip BRADBOURN on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
Term 6 20.07.2004 - 13.07.2009
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| RSS | deleted |
|
|