Aldo PATRICIELLO
Constituencies
-
Italy
Il Popolo della Libertà
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier Constituencies...
-
Italy
Unione dei Democratici cristiani e dei Democratici di Centro
2006/05/08 - 2009/07/13
-
Italy
Forza Italia
2006/05/08 - 2009/07/13
-
Italy
Unione dei Democratici cristiani e dei Democratici di Centro
2006/05/08 - 2009/07/13
Groups
-
PPE
Member
Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
2009/07/14 - 9999/12/31
Show earlier groups...
Committees
| Role | Committee | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Committee on Budgetary Control | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Member of | Committee on Industry, Research and Energy | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Committee on Regional Development | 2012/01/19 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier commitees...
Delegations
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Member of | Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees | 2009/09/16 | 9999/12/31 |
Show earlier delegations...
| Role | Delegation | Start | End |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) | 2006/06/06 | 2007/03/13 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Bulgaria Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2006/06/12 | 2006/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) | 2006/06/06 | 2007/03/13 |
| Member of | Delegation to the EU-Bulgaria Joint Parliamentary Committee | 2006/06/12 | 2006/12/31 |
| Substitute of | Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) | 2007/03/14 | 2009/07/13 |
Contact
Online
- Homepage
- http://www.forzaitalia.it
- Homepage
- http://www.patriciello.it
- [javascript protected email address]
Brussels
- Phone
- +322 28 45418
- Fax
- +322 28 49418
- Office
- Bât. Altiero Spinelli 09E217
- Full Address
-
- City
- Bruxelles/Brussel
- Zip
- B-1047
- Street
- 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60
Strasbourg
- Phone
- +333 88 1 75418
- Fax
- +333 88 1 79418
- Office
- Bât. Louise Weiss T10063
- Full Address
-
- City
- Strasbourg
- Zip
- CS 91024 - F-67070
- Street
- 1, avenue du Président Robert Schuman
Postal
- Parlamento europeo
- Rue Wiertz
- Altiero Spinelli 09E217
- B-1047 Bruxelles
Rapporteur
| Opinion | 2012/2030(INI) | Completing the Digital Single Market |
| Responsible | 2011/2148(INI) | Towards a space strategy for the European Union that benefits its citizens |
| Opinion | 2010/2079(INI) | Simplifying the implementation of the Research Framework Programmes |
Born
1957/09/27 Venafro- Qualified surveyor (1976).
- Member of the DC; leader of the regional youth movement; member of the regional secretariat of the UDC; member of the national leadership of the UDC (since 1979).
- Administrator at the municipal council of Venafro (IS) (1983-1995).
- Member of the Regional Council of Molise; Vice-chairman of the Regional Council; Molise Regional Councillor responsible for the budget, transport, agriculture and production activities; Vice-president of the Regional Government (1995-2006).
Amendments
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 98 |
2009/0076(COD) Placing on the market and use of biocidal products
2010/02/25
ITRE
98 amendments...
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21a) As the WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES) constitutes a system for effective testing and evaluation of the impact of insecticides on public health, compliance with the final recommendations approved under that scheme should be regarded as equivalent to the product authorisation required by this Regulation.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) In order to facilitate access to the internal market and to avoid the additional costs and time involved in obtaining separate national authorisations in separate Member States, the Commission
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Applicants that have invested in supporting the inclusion of an active substance in Annex I or in the authorisation of a biocidal product in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation and/or those of Directive 98/8/EC should be able to recover part of their investment by receiving equitable compensation whenever use of proprietary information which they submitted in support of such inclusions or authorisations is made for the benefit of subsequent applicants.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) In view of ensuring that all proprietary information submitted in support of an inclusion of an active substance in Annex I or an authorisation of a biocidal product is protected from the moment of its submission and to prevent situations where some information is without protection, the provision on information protection periods should also apply to information submitted for the purposes of Directive 98/8/EC.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 61 (61) In particular, the Commission should be empowered to adopt measures to decide on the application to include the active substance in Annex I or to renew or review the inclusion, to specify the procedures related to the renewal and review of an inclusion of an active substance in Annex I,
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 66 (66) Taking into consideration that some products were not previously covered by the Community legislation in the field of biocidal products, it is appropriate to allow for a transitional period for the companies to be prepared to apply the rules concerning in situ generated active substances, treated articles and
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point p a (new) (pa) Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 8 a (new) (8a) Biocidal products for Product Type 18 manufactured in accordance with the Final Recommendations approved under the WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES) shall be considered to be authorised within the meaning of Chapter VII of this Regulation. Articles 38 and 57 shall apply accordingly.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n (n) 'authorisation' means national authorisation or Community authorisation or primary authorisation or duplicate authorisation or additional authorisation;
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new) (na) 'duplicate authorisation' means an administrative act by which, for the benefit of the holder of a primary authorisation, a Member State or the Commission authorises the placing on the market and the use of the same biocidal product under a different name;
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n b (new) (nb) 'additional authorisation' means an administrative act by which a Member State or the Commission authorises the placing on the market and the use, under a different name, of a biocidal product based on a primary authorisation and on approval by the holder of the primary authorisation;
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point s Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point u a (new) (ua) 'administrative (or formal) variation' means a variation to an existing authorisation of a purely administrative (or formal) nature, which does not require a re- assessment of the risk to public health or the environment or the efficacy of the product.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point u b (new) (ub) 'limited variation' means a variation to an existing authorisation which is not deemed to be an administrative variation, in that it requires a fresh partial assessment of the risk to public health or the environment and/or of the efficacy of the product. The variation must not aggravate the level of risk to public health or the environment or the efficacy of the product.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point u c (new) (uc) 'major (or substantial) variation' means a variation to an existing authorisation which is not deemed to be an administrative variation or a limited variation.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point u d (new) (ud) 'manufacturer' means: - with reference to an active substance produced within Community territory or placed on the market, the person who manufactures that active substance or a person resident in the Community who is designated by the manufacturer as his sole representative for the purposes of the present Regulation, - with reference to an active substance produced outside Community territory, the person resident in the Community who is designated by the manufacturer of the active substance as his sole representative for the purposes of the present Regulation or, if no such person has been designated, the person who imports the active substance in question into the Community, - with reference to an active substance produced outside Community territory, the person resident in the Community who is designated by the manufacturer of the active substance as his sole representative for the purposes of the present Regulation or, if no such person has been designated, the person who imports the biocidal product in question into the Community,
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new – first Article of Chapter II) Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. An active substance shall be included in Annex I for an initial period not exceeding 10 years if at least one of the biocidal products containing that active substance fulfils the conditions laid down in point (b) of Article 16(1).
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 - introductory part 3. An active substance and a statement of the reference source for the determination of technical equivalence shall, where appropriate, be included in Annex I together with any of the following conditions:
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) (fa) indication of the chemical identity as regards stereoisomers.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) a dossier for the active substance satisfying the requirements set out in Annex II or a letter of access;
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) a dossier or a letter of access for at least one representative biocidal product that contains the active substance satisfying the requirements set out in Annex III.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The Agency shall assign a reference number to each application, which shall be used for all correspondence concerning the application until the substance is included in Annex I, and a submission date, which shall be the date of receipt by the Agency.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 – introductory part Within t
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Within two months after the receipt of an application, the Agency shall register each part of the information in the dossier with a unique identifying code.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. An active substance fulfilling at least one of the following criteria shall be considered a candidate for substitution in accordance with the procedure referred to in paragraph 2: (a)
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. When preparing an opinion on the inclusion or renewal of the inclusion of an active substance in Annex I, the Agency shall examine whether the active substance fulfils any of the criteria listed in paragraph 1 and, if exposure is not adequately controlled, bearing in mind the intrinsic hazards of the substance, shall address the matter in its opinion.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Application for
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a a) the active substances included therein are listed in Annex I, a registration number is assigned to them in accordance with Article 8, paragraph 5a, and any conditions included in that Annex together with those active substances are complied with;
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point c c) the
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) The evaluation of the compliance of the biocidal products with the criteria set out in point (b) of paragraph 1 should be based as far as possible on existing information on the substances of concern contained in the biocidal product in order to keep tests on animals to a minimum. In particular, use should be made of the provisions of Directive 1999/45/EC or Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on identifying the danger posed by biocidal products and consequent risk assessment.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraphs 2a and 2 b (new) The evaluation of the compliance of the biocidal products with the criteria set out in point (b) of paragraph 1 should be based as far as possible on existing information on the substances of concern contained in the biocidal product in order to keep tests on animals to a minimum. In particular, use should be made of the provisions of Directive 1999/45/EC or Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on identifying the danger posed by biocidal products and consequent risk evaluation. The evaluation of the compliance of the biocidal product with the criteria set out in point (b) and the requirements set out in point (c) of paragraph 1 shall not take into account a substance contained in the biocidal product if it is present in a preparation at a concentration lower than any of the following: (a) the applicable concentrations laid down in Article 3(3) of Directive 1999/45/EC; (b) the concentration limit values given in Annex I to Directive 67/548/EEC; (c) the concentration limit values given in Part B of Annex II to Directive 1999/45/EC; (d) the concentration limit values given in Part B of Annex III to Directive 1999/45/EC; (e) the concentration limit given in an agreed entry in the classification and labelling inventory established under Title V of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008; (f) 0.1% weight by weight (w/w), if the substance meets the criteria in Annex XIII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 6 6. In the case of a frame formulation,
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 72(2), the Commission shall provide scientific and technical guidance for the authorisation of products, particularly as regards uniform requirements for data, evaluation procedures and decisions by the Member States.
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The applicant for a
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 2. The application for primary authorisation shall be accompanied by the fees payable under Article 70.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. The
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 72(2), the Commission shall provide a standard technical and legal guide and, in particular, assistance with authorisation applications in accordance with Articles 18, 19 and 20, particularly for SME.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 - point e e) qualitative and quantitative composition in terms of the active substances and non- active substances, taking into consideration the concentration limit values given in Article 16, in so far as knowledge of
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point g g) manufacturers of the active substances (names and addresses including location of manufacturing sites) and registration number of the active substance, in accordance with Article 8(5a);
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point a a) the reference biocidal product within the group of products comprising the frame formulation
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b b) the
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point c Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 1. The receiving competent authority or, in the case of evaluation of an application for a Community authorisation, the evaluating competent authority shall perform a comparative assessment
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, a comparative assessment shall not be required for biocidal products whose use has been shown to be safe.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 2. The results of the comparative assessment shall be forwarded, without delay, to the competent authorities of other Member States and the Agency and, in the case of
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 3. The receiving competent authority or, in the case of a decision on a
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall adopt the measures and procedures required to define how a comparative assessment should be carried out for biocidal products in accordance with paragraph 3. These measures shall define the criteria and algorithms to be used for a comparative assessment so as to ensure uniform application throughout the Community.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 a (new) – to be inserted at the end of Chapter IV Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 1. The receiving competent authority shall, within
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. If the ingredients contained in the biocidal product have already been registered for use in biocidal products in accordance with Regulation No 1907/2006, the evaluating competent authority shall not carry out a further assessment.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. The authorisation holder or his representative shall submit an application for renewal of a national authorisation to the receiving competent authority at least
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall, after consultation with the applicant, adopt a decision on whether the grounds set out by the competent authority justify refusal to recognise, or restriction of, the national authorisation in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 72(3).
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Within three months of receiving the notification, the Commission shall make a proposal for a decision. Should the Commission ask the Agency for an opinion under the procedure set out in Article 30, the three-month period shall be suspended until the Agency has forwarded its opinion.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall, after consultation with the applicant, adopt a decision on whether the grounds set out by the competent authority justify refusal to recognise, or restriction of, the national authorisation in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 72(3).
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 3 a (new) Within three months of receiving the notification, the Commission shall make a proposal for a decision. Should the Commission ask the Agency for an opinion under the procedure set out in Article 30, the three-month period shall be suspended until the Agency has forwarded its opinion.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall, after consultation with the applicant, adopt a decision on the proposed adjustment of the conditions of the national authorisation to local circumstances in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 72(3). The competent authority of the concerned Member State shall without delay adopt all appropriate measures to comply with that decision.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) Within three months of receiving the notification, the Commission shall make a proposal for a decision. Should the Commission ask the Agency for an opinion under the procedure set out in Article 30, the three-month period shall be suspended until the Agency has forwarded its opinion.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Should the ingredients contained in the biocidal product have already been registered, in conformity with Regulation No 1907/2006, for use in biocidal products, the evaluating competent authority shall not duplicate that evaluation.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 3. Within
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 5 Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. The authorisation holder or his representative shall submit an application for renewal of a Community authorisation to the Agency at least 1
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter VIIa (new) – Article 37a (new) Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37b (new – second article in the new Chapter VIIa) Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) changes in the origin or composition of the active substance.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 - paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The cancellation or amendment of a primary authorisation shall apply to duplicate and additional authorisations based on that authorisation.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 - paragraph 1 The competent authority that has granted
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 - paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The amendment of a primary authorisation at the request of the holder of the primary authorisation shall apply to duplicate and additional authorisations based on that authorisation.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 a (new) The criteria and procedures referred to in the first paragraph of this article shall be based, non-exclusively, on the following principles for which a simplified notification procedure has been requested: (a) administrative changes to the authorisation; (b) changes to the biocidal product within the range permitted under an existing authorised frame formulation; (c) placing on the market of a new biocidal product within the limits of an existing authorised frame formulation; (d) changes in a biocidal product which do not adversely alter the level of the risk or efficacy of the product.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 1. By way of derogation from Article 15, an experiment or a test for the purposes of research or development, including product- and process-oriented research and development activities, involving the placing on the market of an unauthorised biocidal product or an active substance intended exclusively for use in a biocidal product may only take place in the case of scientific research and development or in the case of product and process-oriented research and development, and under the conditions laid down in the second and third subparagraphs. In the case of scientific research and development, the person who intends to carry out the experiment or the test shall notify the competent authority prior to the start. The person shall draw up and maintain written records detailing the identity of the biocidal product or active substance, labelling data
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 – point a a) the name, using wherever possible a common nomenclature (e.g. INCI), of all active substances that were used to treat the article or materials or that were incorporated in the articles or materials where relevant, and of all active substances intended to be released by the article or material treated in normal or foreseeable conditions of use, unless this is already required under labelling rules or alternative ways of satisfying information requirements already existing in specific sectoral legislation;
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 – point b b) where relevant, the biocidal property attributed to treated articles
Amendment 168 #
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 – point d d) solely in the case of treated articles and where appropriate, any hazard statement or precautionary statement set out in the authorisation for the biocidal product.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point a a) the subsequent applicant has written agreement in the form of a letter of access
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) the subsequent applicant is also an owner of the data.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 4 Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Articolo 55 – paragrafo 3 3. Any person submitting information related to an active substance or a biocidal product to the Agency or a competent authority for the purposes of this Regulation can request that the information in Article 56(2) shall not be made available including a justification as to why the disclosure of the information could be harmful for his or any other concerned party's commercial interests.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Labels shall not be misleading and, in any case, shall not mention the indications
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 3. Advertisements for biocidal products shall not refer to the product in a manner which is misleading in respect of the risks from the product to human health or the environment. In any case, the advertising of a biocidal product shall not mention
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point a a) a reduced fee shall be set for small and medium-sized enterprises within the meaning of Recommendation 2003/361/EC concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises; this in no way alters the responsibility of the evaluating competent authority for carrying out an accurate evaluation within the meaning of the Regulation;
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point d d)
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. The Commission shall carry on with the work programme for the systematic examination of all existing active substances commenced in accordance with Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC and achieve it by
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 77 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 Biocidal products, for which an application for a product authorisation has not been submitted in accordance with the second subparagraph, shall no longer be placed on the market with effect from
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 82 Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 83 – paragraph -1 (new) From 1 January 2014 all manufacturers of an existing active substance placed on the market for use in biocidal products shall submit to the Agency a request to include the substance in Annex I. Competent authorities shall carry out official controls in accordance with Article 54(1).
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 83 – paragraph 2 a (new) Competent authorities shall take the necessary measures in accordance with Article 54(2).
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – Title 1 – point 2.2 2.2. Detailed quantitative and qualitative information on the composition of the biocidal product, e.g. active substance(s), impurities, adjutants, inert components, taking into account the concentration limits laid down in Article 16
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III - paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The information shall, as far as possible, be taken from existing data in order to minimise animal tests. The provisions of Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 shall, in particular, be applied.
source: PE-439.127
|
| 1 |
2009/0105(COD) European Regional Development Fund ERDF: eligibility of housing interventions in favour of marginalised communities (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006)
2009/10/22
REGI
1 amendments...
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) N°1080/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4 The Commission
source: PE-430.334
|
| 22 |
2009/0108(COD) Energy policy: measures to safeguard security of gas supply (repeal. Directive 2004/67/EC)
2010/01/19
ITRE
2 amendments...
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall ensure coordinat
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. By [31 March 2011; 12 months from entry into force] at the latest, on the basis of the risk and impact assessment carried out according to Article 8, the Competent Authority, after consultation of the natural gas undertakings, of gas-powered generators, of the relevant organisations representing the interests of household and industrial customers and of the regulatory authority, where it is not the Competent Authority, shall establish:
source: PE-438.187
2010/01/20
ITRE
20 amendments...
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. Following the recommendation of the Commission referred to in Article 4(3) or in the situation referred to in Article 4(4), the
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The methodology for calculating the N-1
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Each Competent Authority shall
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 7 7. National Regulatory Authorities shall duly take into account the costs of fulfilling the N-1 standard and the costs of enabling the permanent physical capacity to transport gas in both directions in their approval of tariffs in a transparent and detailed manner, reflecting costs incurred in a clear and identifiable manner and in line with Article 41(8) of Directive
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. The Competent Authorit
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. By [30
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Following the recommendation of the Commission as referred to in Article 4(3) or in the situation referred to in Article 4(4), the obligations set out in this article may be fulfilled at the regional level.
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. The natural gas undertakings, gas- powered generators, the relevant organisations representing the interests of household and industrial customers and the regulatory authority, where it is not the Competent Authority, shall cooperate and provide all necessary information for the risk and impact assessment.
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. The risk and impact assessment shall be repeated every two years before 30 September of that year.
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. The Competent Authority shall immediately inform the Commission and the Gas Coordination Group and provide
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 3. In a
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 4. When the Commission considers that in a
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) hourly flow of gas at all cross-border entry and exit points as well as all points connecting
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) period, expressed in days, during which it is
Amendment 471 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 6 – point a a) Member States shall submit to the Commission the existing inter- governmental agreements concluded with third countries which have an impact on the development of gas infrastructures and supplies;
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 6 – point b b)
source: PE-438.231
|
| 4 |
2009/0173(COD) Reduction of CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles: emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles
2010/05/19
ITRE
3 amendments...
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 For the calendar year commencing 1 January 201
source: PE-441.217
2010/12/05
ITRE
1 amendments...
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 1 1. The
source: PE-441.272
|
| 20 |
2010/2095(INI) Industrial Policy for the globalised era
2010/11/16
ITRE
20 amendments...
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas maintaining global leadership of European industry is only possible through new technologies/processes/solutions, R&D, a sophisticated supply-chain, better efficiency, strong human resources, good logistics and infrastructure, as cost-cutting alone is not the way forward for industry in Europe,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that, with the E
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the importance of the manufacturing sector for the European economy as the main source of long-term economic growth;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Highlights the fact that sustainable development, as defined by the Johannesburg Conference in 2002, shall be based on three pillars: economic, social and environmental; in order to have the most competitive economy the industrial policy shall be sustained by finding a balanced mix of these factors;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to develop, together with the European Parliament and the Council, a qualitative
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that the new, integrated approach calls for extremely effective collaboration within the Commission, and calls on the Commission to set up a permanent industrial policy task force to this end; furthermore calls on the Commission to focus more on competitiveness aspects during the impact assessment process (“Competitiveness Proofing”) as well as to evaluate ex post the cumulated impact of legal acts and to implement this essential part of smart regulation as quickly as possible;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 – indent 3 · must
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recalls that, representing as it does an annual 17% of GDP in the EU, public procurement is a powerful instrument for stimulating innovation; points out that competitors such as China and the USA have set ambitious targets for public procurement of innovative and environmental sustainable products, and calls for similar target setting in the EU in line with the EU 2020 Strategy;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 – indent 1 - intensification of raw material recovery by
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 – indent 3 - optimal utilisation of and improved access to raw materials available in the EU, calling among other things for the rapid introduction of a European geo- information system that gives an overview of the raw materials available in the EU,
Amendment 318 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 a (new) - setting up incentives for higher education to adjust the curricula accordingly,
Amendment 350 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls for the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) to be extended beyond 2013 and its total amount of funding considerably expanded;
Amendment 351 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Stress the need for a systematic quality check of any new legislation using the following criteria: · scientific advice: quality of evidence and interpretation, · consultation: ask "users" about the experience of existing regulations, · international benchmarking: compare with legislation in key competing countries, · consistency of the proposal with related EU legislation, · simplification achieved (including voluntary alternatives);
Amendment 393 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 – indent 2 a (new) • to implement projects to enable the networking of SMEs and larger companies along the value chain;
Amendment 396 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 – indent 2 b (new) • to promote the internationalisation of SMEs;
Amendment 419 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls for future trade agreements to be drawn up in such a way that they
Amendment 429 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Commission to deliver on the objectives set out in the Global Europe communication and forthcoming communication on trade policy, notably by ambitious new market access in the Doha Round, including sectoral agreements, e.g. chemicals and machinery;
Amendment 436 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Stresses that employees" ideas and skills must be used in the restructuring of industry, and therefore calls for the widest possible consultation
Amendment 446 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 – indent 1 • the existing industry-specific approaches (task forces, high-level groups, technology and innovation platforms such as Cars 21, etc.) to be renewed, comparably developed and equipped with clear strategic content by the Commission, in consultation with all stakeholders,
Amendment 451 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 – indent 2 • the results to be implemented in a way that is tailored to the needs of the specific industries in a value chain approach,
source: PE-452.697
|
| 5 |
2011/0276(COD) Structural instruments: common provisions for ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD and EMFF; general provisions applicable to ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund
2012/08/05
ITRE
5 amendments...
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Member States should concentrate support to ensure a significant contribution to the achievement of Union objectives in line with their specific national and regional development needs. Ex ante conditionalities should be defined to ensure that the necessary framework conditions for the effective use of Union support are in place. The fulfilment of those ex ante conditionalities should be assessed by the Commission in the framework of its assessment of the Partnership Contract and programmes. In cases where there is a failure to fulfil an ex ante conditionality, the Commission should have the power to consider suspending payments to the programme.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) Financial instruments are increasingly important due to their leverage effect on CSF
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) enhancing the competitiveness especially of small and medium-sized enterprises and their networks, the agricultural sector (for the EAFRD) and the fisheries and aquaculture sector (for the EMFF);
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (4) supporting, in all sectors, the shift towards a low-
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Part 2 – Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point 6 (6) protecting the environment and cultural heritage and promoting resource knowledge and efficiency;
source: PE-488.023
|
| 4 |
2011/0399(COD) Horizon 2020 - Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020: rules for participation and dissemination
2012/02/07
ITRE
1 amendments...
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 3. For the purposes of this Regulation an entity which does not have legal personality under the applicable national law is assimilated to a legal entity provided that the conditions set out in Article 114(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No XX/2012 [the Financial Regulation] and Article 174a of the implementing rules therefore are complied with.
source: PE-492.762
2012/03/07
ITRE
3 amendments...
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. Indirect eligible costs shall be determined by applying a flat rate of
Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Independent experts shall be chosen on the basis of skills, experience and knowledge appropriate to carry out the tasks assigned to them. When appointing independent experts, the Commission shall seek to achieve a balanced composition within the expert groups in terms of various skills, experience and knowledge, depending on the field of the action and a strong involvement of experts coming from the industry sector. In cases where independent experts have to deal with classified information, the appropriate security clearance shall be required before appointment.
source: PE-492.763
|
| 3 |
2011/0401(COD) Horizon 2020 - Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2014-2020
2012/06/29
ITRE
3 amendments...
Amendment 619 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. The integrated approach set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 is expected to lead to around
Amendment 678 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 For the purposes of point (a), top-up funding shall be conditional on a
Amendment 683 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point b (b)
source: PE-492.710
|
| 2 |
2012/0180(COD) Collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market
2013/05/16
ITRE
2 amendments...
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that the collecting society regularly and diligently distributes and pays amounts due to all rightholders it represents and this on the basis of the information provided by users within 6 months after the use of the content. The collecting society shall carry out such distribution and payments no later than 12 months from the end of the financial year in which the rights revenue was collected, unless objective reasons related in particular to reporting by users, the identification of rights, rightholders or to the matching of information on works and other subject matter with rightholders prevent the collecting society from respecting this deadline. The collecting society shall carry out such distribution and payments accurately, ensuring equal treatment of all categories of rightholders.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In order to ensure a timely, fair and transparent distribution of rights, collecting societies shall require to users to receive the analytical accounts of the works used, according to the standards reports provided by collecting societies or in use in the sector, no later than 6 months after the use of the music work.
source: PE-510.534
|
| 2 |
2013/2045(INI) Tackling youth unemployment: possible ways out
2013/04/30
FEMM
2 amendments...
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on Member States, in agreement with the Commission, to establish a tax incentive scheme to promote youth employment and support under-35 undertakings, by means of incentives for undertakings, particularly SMEs, to recruit young people on permanent contracts; to this end, proposes that, as suggested by the Commission in the employment package, the Member States could use the instrument of employment subsidies and reduction of the tax wedge, particularly to meet the cost to employers of social security and health insurance contributions;
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on Member States, in agreement with the Commission, to establish measures and concessions for apprenticeship contracts and bonuses for business start-ups by young people aged under 35; considers, in particular, that Member States should provide greater and better support services for start-ups, organise awareness-raising campaigns concerning the opportunities and prospects involved in self-employment, arrange more cooperation between employment services, and provide support for businesses, including with the aid of (micro-) financing;
source: PE-510.608
|
Aldo PATRICIELLO on
Activities
Term 7 14.07.2009 / ...
Term 6 20.07.2004 - 13.07.2009
All references link to europarl.euHistory
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| active | changed |
Old
New
True |