| added | activities | -
- date
- 2003-11-18
- docs
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2003&nu_doc=0698
- text
PURPOSE : to establish common rules for direct support schemes
under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain
support schemes for farmers.
PROPOSED ACT : Council Regulation.
CONTENT : the Commission has presented proposals aiming to reform
the CAP rules concerning cotton, olive oil and table olives,
tobacco in order to enhance competition, create a stronger
market-orientation, improve environmental respect, stabilise
incomes for farmers and respect the situation of producers in least
favoured areas.
Specific circumstances prevail as regards the sectors of cotton,
olive and tobacco, which show a tendency to concentrate their
production in regions that are notably lagging behind in their
economic development. This proposal takes into account the
potential impact of a full de-coupling in these sectors, in
particular the risk of production abandonment and a declining
competitiveness of rural areas. For that reason, a part of the
expenditure should continue to be sector-specific in the case of
cotton and olive cultivation and the integration of raw tobacco in
the single payment scheme should be carried out gradually. As far
as hops is concerned, Member States may retain a percentage of the
aid to allow for a coupled aid.
1) COTTON : the Commission proposes to transfer the part of the
EAGGF expenditure for cotton that was destined to producer support
during the 2000-2002 reference period, into the funding of two
support measures, namely, the single payment and a new
production aid, granted as an area payment. The budget destined to
cover both measures is established on the basis of the average
expenditure on aid to this sector in the reference years reduced by
the amounts that were received by the ginners but not necessarily
transferred to the producers.
The total amount to be deducted from the average budget spent on
production aid during the reference period is EUR 107,5 million.
Considering that the total average budget is of EUR 803 million,
the total amount to be allowed to the single payment scheme and the
new production aid for cotton is EUR 695,8 million, distributed as
follows: EUR 504,4 million for Greece, EUR 190,8 million for Spain
and EUR 0,565 million for Portugal. It is proposed that 40% of the
budget envelope for producer support be destined to the aid per
hectare. On the basis of the above mentioned EUR 695,8 million
budget, this would correspond to EUR 278,5 million, i.e. EUR 202
million in Greece, EUR 76,3 million in Spain and EUR 0,2 million in
Portugal.
For environmental and quality reasons, the areas on which cotton
can be grown and the appropriate varieties that can be sown will
have to be authorised by Member States.
Accordingly, the maximum area is proposed at 85 000 ha in Spain,
i.e. 5% below the average eligible area for the period 2000/01 to
2002/03. In Portugal, where there have been no overshoots of the
NGQ, the maximum area can be set at 360 ha, corresponding to the
average eligible area in 2000/01 to 2002/03.
In the light of the total budget available for direct product
support for cotton, and taking into account the 40% share allocated
to production aid, the balance of the budget available for direct
income aid is EUR 302,4 million in Greece, EUR 114,5 million in
Spain and EUR 0,365 million in Portugal, i.e. a total of EUR 417,3
million.
The entitlements per producer will have to be calculated on
thebasis of the eligible areas under cotton in the marketing years
2000/01 to 2002/03. On average, these total 469 816 ha, i.e. 380
436 ha in Greece, 89 023 ha in Spain and 357 ha in Portugal.
Consequently, the direct income aid to producers in respect of
eligible areas under cotton in 2000/01 to 2002/03 shall be
calculated on the basis of EUR 795 per hectare in Greece, EUR 1 286
per hectare in Spain and EUR 1 022 per hectare in Portugal.
The inter-branch organisations and their aid differentiation scales
will need to be approved by the Member State concerned. These
organisations are to be financed by its members, but as an
encouragement to the sector the Community should contribute to
their activities via an increase of EUR 10 in the production aid
per eligible hectare. The total budget for the Community for this
purpose would thus be EUR 4,3 million.
A grower not belonging to any inter-branch organisation would
receive the unit amount of aid. It is conceived that a financial
transfer for rural development measures in the cotton production
areas should be made.
The budget corresponds to the amount not necessarily transferred to
producers in the current system reduced by the amount provided for
the encouragement of the setting-up of inter-branch organisations.
This results in EUR 102,9 million, to be shared out between the
Member States on the basis of the average area eligible for aid in
the reference period. These amounts would be an integral part of
the second pillar of the CAP.
2) RAW TOBACCO : the proposed reform should begin with the transfer
of all or part of the current tobacco premium payment into
entitlements for the single payment. The Commission states that the
gradual de-coupling of the current aid scheme for raw tobacco
should be accompanied by the setting up, in the framework of rural
development, of a financial envelope for restructuring concerned
areas.
The proposed reform should begin with the transfer of all or part
of the current tobacco premium payment into entitlements for the
single payment.
The restructuring envelope will be the difference between a total
envelope of EUR 955 million and the proposed coupled and de-coupled
aid as well as payments made under the tobacco quota buy-back
scheme.
Each Member State should receive an amount corresponding to the
difference between its historical expenditure and the proposed
coupled and de-coupled aid, to be used in favour of tobacco
producing regions.
As regards the premium that will continue to be granted for tobacco
production during the harvest years 2005 and 2006, an amount equal
to 4% for the first year and 5% for the second year should be
transferred to the Community Tobacco Fund, for the
purpose of financing actions of information for improving public
awareness of the harmful effects of tobacco consumption.
3) OLIVE GROVES : income support will be integrated into the new
single payment scheme. It will be equal to a percentage of the
average production aid for olive oil and table olives granted
during the reference period. The surface area to be taken into
consideration (henceforth expressed as "olive GIS-ha") will be
established by the Member States on the basis of the data in a
geographical information system (GIS) for olive cultivation,
incorporated in the Integrated Administration and Control
System
(IACS) and constantly kept up to date. The method of calculatingthe
number of olive GIS-ha will be established by the Commission for
the entire Community in such a way as to take account of the number
of olive trees and their position on the ground.
The Commission considers that it would be appropriate to transfer
60% of the existing aid for olive oil to the single payment scheme.
However, this percentage should not be applied to holdings of less
than 0,3 olive GIS-ha since the entire amount of the payments
received by them during the reference period will be allocated to
the single payment. In order to ensure that the new aid system
cannot alter the fragile balance currently
prevailing on the olive oil market, access to the single payment
scheme must be limited to olive-growing areas existing prior to 1
May 1998 and to new plantings provided for under the programmes
approved by the Commission.
Each Member State will have a national envelope equal to 40% of the
direct aid paid to olive-growing holdings of more than 0,3 olive
GIS-ha. The aid will be granted according to procedures to be
specified by the Commission and will follow the principles such as
the surface area of the olive grove, expressed as a number of olive
GIS-ha; a record of the existence of the olive grove prior to 1 May
1998; Member States are to define up to five categories of olive
groves which are eligible for aid on the basis of their
environmental and social value; Member States will set the amount
of aid corresponding to each category, which should not exceed
maintenance costs excluding harvesting costs; granting of the aid
in the years following its introduction will be conditional upon
the number of olive trees remaining the same as at 1 January 2005,
subject to a variation of no more than 10%, and upon the
characteristics of the particular category of olive grove for which
the aid was requested being preserved; for reasons of
simplification, only applications for amounts of over EUR 50 will
be accepted.
4) HOPS : the support scheme for hops is to be integrated fully in
Council Regulation 1782/2003/EC. This market is primarily marked by
a continuous search for balance between the offer of hops and the
requirements of the beer industry. Two remarkable
phenomena characterised the market trend during the last
decade:
- the consumer's preference developed towards less hopped beers and
therefore the demand for hops fell;
- conversion towards varieties with a high alpha acid content
resulted in a too high an offer of hops on the market. This
situation caused the need to reduce the areas under hop.
The present situation which shows a sector fully directed towards
the requirements of the market and which tends to answer in a
satisfactorily manner leads to envisage that the integration of the
hop production aid scheme in the de-coupled single
payment scheme should allow the safeguarding of hop production in
the Community. That being so, this proposal envisages the
possibility for the Member States to maintain a coupled aid in
order to take into account special production conditions or
specific circumstances in the production regions.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS :
- Budget lines : B1-12, B1-141, B1-17, B1-181, B1-40;
- Appropriations : EUR 8906 million;
- Estimated expenditure : decoupled aid, coupled aid, market
measures and transfer to rural development : EUR 4110 millions per
year;
- Impact of the measure : EUR -113 million per year.
- celexid
- CELEX:52003PC0698(02):EN
- type
- Legislative proposal published
- title
- COM(2003)0698
- body
- EC
- commission
-
- DG
- Agriculture and Rural Development
- type
- Legislative proposal
-
- date
- 2003-12-03
- body
- EP
- type
- Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
- committees
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- True
- committee
- AGRI
- date
- 2003-11-25
- 2003-11-25
- 2003-11-25
- 2003-11-25
- 2003-11-25
- committee_full
- Agriculture and Rural Development
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- DAUL Joseph
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- MAYER Xaver
-
- group
- PSE
- name
- LAVARRA Vincenzo
-
- group
- PSE
- name
- RODRÍGUEZ RAMOS María
-
- group
- UEN
- name
- BERLATO Sergio
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- False
- committee
- BUDG
- date
- 2003-12-16
- committee_full
- Budgets
- rapporteur
-
- date
- 2003-12-17
- docs
-
- type
- Committee draft report
- title
- PE329.836
- body
- EP
- type
- Committee draft report
-
- date
- 2003-12-22
- body
- CSL
- type
- Council Meeting
- council
- Environment
- meeting_id
- 2556
-
- body
- EP
- committees
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- True
- committee
- AGRI
- date
- 2003-11-25
- 2003-11-25
- 2003-11-25
- 2003-11-25
- 2003-11-25
- committee_full
- Agriculture and Rural Development
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- DAUL Joseph
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- MAYER Xaver
-
- group
- PSE
- name
- LAVARRA Vincenzo
-
- group
- PSE
- name
- RODRÍGUEZ RAMOS María
-
- group
- UEN
- name
- BERLATO Sergio
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- False
- committee
- BUDG
- date
- 2003-12-16
- committee_full
- Budgets
- rapporteur
- docs
-
- url
- http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-0123&language=EN
- type
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
- title
- A5-0123/2004
- text
The committee adopted the report tabled by its chairman,
Joseph DAUL (EPP-ED, F), in conjunction with four co-rapporteurs
(María RODRÍGUEZ RAMOS (PES, E) for cotton, Sergio
BERLATO (UEN, I) for tobacco, Vincenzo LAVARRA (PES, I) for olive
oil and Xaver MAYER (EPP-ED, D) for hops) amending the proposal
under the consultation procedure.
The committee highlighted its concern about the negative impact
that a drastic decoupling of aid could have on the poorest regions
of Italy, Spain, Greece and Portugal, where cotton, olive and
tobacco production is concentrated. It pointed out that, "in
accordance with the agreement on CAP reform reached in Luxembourg
in June 2003 the single farm payment scheme should be implemented
in such a way as not to lead to the discontinuation of production"
and warned that support for these sectors should be decoupled "on
the basis of specific arrangements intended to ensure that the
incomes of all those engaged in agriculture are maintained and that
the fabric of rural society is safeguarded".
Turning to the four sectors concerned, MEPs adopted a series of
amendments as follows:
- Cotton: MEPs called for greater flexibility in implementing the
reform and suggested that Member States be allowed to allocate up
to 80% of aid for production (in the form of area payments
distributed per hectare), instead of 40% as proposed by the
Commission, with the remaining 20% (as opposed to 60%) being
allocated as direct income aid to farmers in the form of the
"single payment scheme". The rapporteur for the cotton sector
argued that the Commission's proposed system of payments, involving
a large cut in production aid, would lead to production being
abandoned in regions already facing high unemployment. MEPs also
wanted to allow a sufficient transitional period and therefore
proposed that the reform should enter into force only in 2007.
Moreover, they called on the Commission to present by January 2006
an impact study on this decoupling of aid for the cotton-producing
regions, including a possible proposal to modify the percentage
intended for aid per hectare;
- Tobacco: whereas the Commission was proposing the total
decoupling of aid for this sector, the committee said that this
would cause tobacco-growing to be abandoned in all production
areas, which would have a severe socio-economic impact. MEPs
therefore called for partial decoupling and said that, "to deal
with specific situations with the desired flexibility", only 30% of
aid should be transferred into the single payment scheme. In view
of the differences between producer Member States and between
product varieties, they said that the remaining part of the aid
(70%) should be used by the Member States in order to maintain
production in areas where its continuation was essential "on
objective economic and social grounds". Furthermore, they proposed
that up to 10% of this remaining part of the aid could be used by
the Member States for measures intended to improve product quality
or for restructuring and retraining policies in the sector. In
addition, the committee called for a general multiannual programme
to be put in place as of 2006 for the restructuring and conversion
of the tobacco sector in the relevant regions. It would be funded
by the new structural fund for rural development proposed by the
Commission. Lastly, MEPs were opposed to the transfer of payments
to the Community Tobacco Fund, arguing that the Commission itself
had acknowledged that there was no link between European tobacco
production and the EU's anti-smoking policy;
- Olive oil: whereas the Commission was proposing that 60% of aid
should be allocated to the the single payment scheme, MEPs said
that 60% should be a minimum and that the Member States should have
the right to increase this percentage "provided that such a measure
does not result in increasing the risk of abandoning or grubbing up
trees". They also proposed that the "coupled" percentage (i.e. the
remaining 40% or less) which will be retained by the Member States
as national envelopes to be distributed among farmers should be
used inter alia to create a national reserve to support young
farmers and for measures to improve quality (including organic
production and harvesting by hand). In view of the specific nature
of olive growing, the committee also said that the average yields
in a homogenous area should be taken as a reference for the purpose
of setting the level of decoupled aid;
- Hops: while supporting the Commission's proposals on the
decoupling of aid, MEPs said that
up to 25% of the coupled aid should be used to finance recognised
producer groups which play an important role in the hop
sector.
- date
- 2004-02-19
- type
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
-
- date
- 2004-02-25
- docs
-
- url
- http://eescopinions.eesc.europa.eu/eescopiniondocument.aspx?language=EN&docnr=0323&year=2004
- type
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
- title
- CES0323/2004
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2004:110:SOM:EN:HTML
- type
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
- title
- OJ C 110 30.04.2004, p. 0116-0124
- body
- ESOC
- type
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
-
- date
- 2004-03-09
- body
- EP
- type
- Debate in Parliament
-
- date
- 2004-03-10
- docs
-
- url
- http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-0164
- text
The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Joseph
DAUL (EPP-ED, F) in conjunction with four co-rapporteurs (Maria
RODRIGUEZ RAMOS (PES, E) for cotton, Sergio BERLATO (UEN, I) for
tobacco, Vincenzo LAVARRA (PES, I) for olive oil and Xaver MAYER
(EPP-ED, D) for hops). Parliament made some significant amendments
to the proposal. (Please see the document dated 19/02/04.)
Cotton: to recap, Parliament stated that in the case of cotton 80
per cent of aid should be still linked to production, instead of 40
per cent, as the Commission suggested. The Commission proposed for
the cotton sector a partial decoupling of aid: 60 per cent would be
a direct income aid to the farmers and 40 per cent would remain as
area payments (distributed per hectare). The distribution of the
funds would be measured according to a reference period - the
cultivation during 2000-2002. The rest of the expenses for cotton
would be transferred to the rural development measures and for the
restructuring of the regions concerned. Parliament rejected those
measures, on the grounds that such a system of payments would
provoke the abandonment of production in regions which are fairly
poor. Therefore, 80 per cent of the aid should remain as area
payments and the reform should enter into force only in 2007.
Parliament stated that cotton is cultivated essentially in regions
whose GDP is among the lowest in the EU and whose economy is
closely bound up with agriculture. In these areas, cotton growing
and the ginning activity which supports it are major sources of
income and employment, accounting in some localities for over 80 %
of activity. Furthermore, in certain areas, in agronomic terms, the
soil conditions are such that to introduce alternative crops would
be impossible in the short term.
Tobacco: in brief, 70 per cent of the financial payments should
remain linked to production. In view of the differences between
producer Member States and between product varieties, the Member
States must use the part of the aid not included in the single
payment with great flexibility in order to maintain the production
in areas where the continuation is essential for social and
economic reasons. Furthermore, up to 10 per cent from the 70 per
cent of aid linked to production may be used by the States for
measures intended to improve product quality or for restructuring
policies in the sector. However, the Commission wants the total
decoupling of aid for tobacco, as a transitional stage towards the
gradual disappearance of the tobacco payments.
Parliament also stated that if certain variety groups face
particular adverse market conditions, Member States might implement
a programme for buying back entitlements to enable producers, on an
individual and voluntary basis, to abandon the business. The amount
to finance this programme shall be equal to the amount of aid
provided for each producer under Article 143k. It shall be spread
over a number of years, up to a maximum of five years, with effect
from the year in which the producer joins the programme for buying
back entitlements, up until 31 December 2013 at the latest.
Olive oil: whereas the Commission proposes decoupling only 60 per
cent of aid, Parliament called for "a minimum of 60 per cent" and
for the Member States to have the right to increase this to 100 per
cent. The coupled percentage will be given directly to the Member
States so they can distribute it among farmers as an areapayment
(either per hectare or per number of trees). The farmers will be
forced to meet social, landscape and quality criteria. The payments
should ensure the quality of the olive oil and that consideration
should be given to measures such as organic production,
hand-harvesting and other measures not related to quantity.
Therefore part of the funds linked to production could be kept by
the Member States as "special aid" for quality standards.
- type
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
- title
- T5-0164/2004
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2004:102E:SOM:EN:HTML
- type
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
- title
- OJ C 102 28.04.2004, p. 0520-0601 E
- body
- EP
- type
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
- date
- 2004-04-21
- body
- type
- Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
-
- date
- 2004-04-21
- body
- CSL
- type
- Council Meeting
- council
- Agriculture and Fisheries
- meeting_id
- 2575
-
- date
- 2004-04-29
- body
- EP
- type
- End of procedure in Parliament
-
- date
- 2004-04-30
- text
PURPOSE : to establish common rules for direct support schemes
under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain
support schemes for farmers.
LEGISLATIVE ACT : Council Regulation 864/2004/EC amending
Regulation 1782/2003/EC establishing common rules for direct
support schemes under the common agricultural policy and
establishing certain support schemes for farmers, and adapting it
by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus,
Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and
Slovakia to the European Union (Corrigendum to the Regulation
published OJ L 161 of 30 April 2004).
CONTENT : the Council decided to profoundly reform the Common
Agricultural Policy (CAP) support for tobacco, olive oil and table
olives, cotton and hops. These reforms will lead to enhanced
competitiveness, stronger market-orientation, improved
environmental respect, less trade distortions and stabilised
incomes for farmers. For the four sectors concerned, a significant
part of the current production-linked payments will be transferred
to the de-coupled single payment. The Danish, Spanish and Swedish
delegations expressed their intention to vote against.
The reform was envisaged as a follow-up to the CAP reform agreed in
June 2003. Two Regulations have been adopted : the first amends
Regulation 1782/2003/EC establishing common rules for direct
support schemes under the common agricultural policy (horizontal
legislation) and the second to reform the common organisation of
the market in the olive oil and table olives (CNS/2003/0279).
The main changes in the compromise amending the Commission
proposals are as follows:
- entry into force of the Reform: the Reform package for cotton,
olive oil and tobacco will begin in 2006 instead of 2005 as stated
in the Commission proposals. For 2005, the current tobacco regime
together with the aids fixed for 2004 will be applied. For olive
oil, the current regime will continue to
apply for the marketing year 2004/2005;
- the use of agricultural use of the land: a measure has been
included which stipulates that Member States may decide to allow
secondary crops to be cultivated on the eligible hectares during a
period of maximum three months starting each year on 15 August;
however, at the request of a Member State,
this date is modified for regions where cereals are normally
harvested earlier for climatic reasons.
- COTTON : the rate of the decoupling payment has been increased to
65% instead of the 60% initially proposed, the coupled part of the
payment being now at 35%. The amount to be transferred to the
second pillar is reduced by EUR 81 million instead of the EUR 103
million initially provided for. The base area for Greece is
increased to 370 000 hectares instead of 340 000 with a different
amount of coupled aid based on the surface area (EUR 594 /hectare
for the first 300 000 hectares, EUR 342,85 /hectare for the
remaining 70 000 hectares). Where the 370 000 hectares base area is
overrun, the aid granted to the 70 000 hectares is reduced
proportionately in order to comply with the global envelope for the
coupled aid. For Spain, the maximum area eligible for aid has been
reduced from 85,000 ha to 70,000 ha and the area aid has been
increased from 851 EUR/ha to 1,039 EUR/ha. For Portugal, the amount
of the aid per eligible hectare shall be EUR 556.
- OLIVE OIL : the decoupling rate will be a minimum of 60%.
Member States may decide to increase this rate. A distinction in
the reference period for the calculation of the reference amount
for each olive farmer has been established and will comprise four
marketing years instead of the three marketing years initially
proposed (2000/2002). The three-year reference period 2000/2002
is
however maintained for the calculation of the national ceiling for
olive oil. Member States may withhold for quality measures up to
10% of the olive oil complement in the national ceiling. The
national ceilings for France and Portugal will take into account
the aid to be granted to new plantings after 1 May 1998 under
programmes approved by the Commission. A corresponding amount of
EUR 1 million for France and EUR 19 million for Portugal will be
added. For Spain, the national budgetary envelope has been
increased by EUR 20 million.
- TOBACCO : the 3 bands (below 3,5 tonnes, between 3,5 and 10
tonnes, over 10 tonnes) initially proposed to set a different rate
of decoupling, from 2005 to 2007, have been abolished. A
transitional scheme towards full decoupling has been set up from
2006 to 2010. During this period, the rate of decoupling for
tobacco producers will be set at a minimum of 40% of the tobacco
reference amount whilst a maximum 60% of this reference amount will
be maintained as a coupled payment. This coupled payment will be
granted to producers situated in Objective 1 regions or tobacco
farmers producing varieties of a certain quality. Other objective
criteria may also be taken into account by the Commission. As from
2010, tobacco aid will be fully decoupled with 50% of the reference
amount included in the Single Farm Payment (SFP) and 50%
transferred to the restructuring envelope.
- HOPS : Member States may grant up to 25% of the aid to farmers
producing hops and to producer organisations recognised under the
current rules of the common market organisation for hops.
ENTRY INTO FORCE : 01/05/2004. This Regulation shall apply as
from 1 January 2006 except for certain provisions which shall apply
as from the entry into force of this Regulation or as from
01/01/2005.
- type
- Final act published in Official Journal
- docs
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32004R0864
- title
- Regulation 2004/864
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:206:SOM:EN:HTML
- title
- OJ L 206 09.06.2004, p. 0020-0036
| |