| added | activities | -
- date
- 1999-11-10
- docs
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1999&nu_doc=0539
- text
PURPOSE: to launch a review of EU regulation in
telecommunications and to put forward the main elements for a new
framework for communications infrastructure and associated
services.
CONTENT: The provisions of the current telecoms regulatory
framework liberalised all telecommunications services and networks
from 1 January 1998. This has transformed a sector traditionally
characterised by state monopolies into a dynamic industry ready to
take full advantage of the global market. However, the process is
not complete. The EU telecoms market remains fragmented and is
dominated by incumbent operators in all Member States,
notwithstanding the rapid development of competition, as
illustrated by falling tariffs and a growing number of operators.
The Review provides the opportunity to re-assess existing
regulation, to ensure that it reinforces the development of
competition and consumer choice, and to continue to safeguard
objectives of general interest.
The new framework will be a central building block of the EU policy
with respect to Information Society for the years to come. However,
it cannot be seen in isolation. Community policies have to combine
the establishment of an effective regulatory framework with
concrete actions to promote the emergence of an inclusive
Information Society. The Community intends to play an important
role in this process by introducing focused initiatives, such as
the e-Europe initiative.
The main elements of the Commission's policy proposals for a new
regulatory framework to cover all communications infrastructure and
associated services are presented. With these proposals the
Commission seeks to build on the successes of the current regime
and ensure that regulation at EU level continues to encourage the
development of a competitive single market and benefits the EU
citizen. Safeguarding Community interests in international
negotiations is also an important objective for the Commission and
Member States, in particular the forthcoming WTO negotiations where
further liberalisation of telecoms in other countries will be vital
to ensure that electronic commerce and the Internet can develop at
a global level.
The Commission's document states that five generally accepted
principles should underpin the new regulatory framework. Future
regulation should:
1) be based on clearly defined policy objectives;
2) be the minimum necessary to meet those objectives;
3) further enhance legal certainty in a dynamic market;
4) aim to be technologically neutral;
5) be enforced as closely as practicable to the activities being
regulated.
Currently, different rules apply to the regulation of different
communications infrastructure and associated services. But
convergence means the same services can be carried over any
transmission network, whether fixed or mobile, telecommunications
or cable TV, satellite or terrestrial. The new framework would
cover all communications infrastructure and associated services so
that equivalent rules apply to these networks. In practice, this
means the new framework would apply to: telecommunications
networks(fixed or mobile), satellite networks, cable TV networks,
and terrestrial broadcast networks, as well as to facilities such
as Application Program Interfaces, which control access to
services. This has important consequences. For example, national
regulators would apply the same licensing principles (of
transparency, non-discrimination, proportionality and objectivity)
when licensing all communications infrastructure and associated
services. It should be noted that where such associated services
are l;inked to services for the provision of content, there may be
a need for additional rules concerning that provision of
content.
These rules would, of course, be withour prejudice to regulatory
obligations (whether EU or national) which apply to the content of
broadcasting services or other information society services.
The new framework would continue to treat Internet transmission
services in the same way as other transmission services (i.e. no
Internet-specific measures are envisaged for the moment).
As regards licensing and authorisations, the current framework
allows Member States to insist on the use of individual licences
(which are specific to an individual operator and require the
operator to seek an explicit authorisation from a regulator before
it can begin operating. This degree of control on market entry
creates administrative barriers which may be dis-proportionate, and
has contributed to large variations in licence regimes in the EU.
The new framework would require operators providing communications
services to be licensed using general authorisations (i.e. no
requirement for explicit authorisation by a regulator before
providing services). Specific authorisations would remain necessary
for the use of radio spectrum and numbering resources. This
deregulated, harmonised framework would reduce the current
variation in licence regimes for telecoms across the EU, which is
holding back innovation, competition and the provision of
pan-European services.
The new framework would establish common principles for regulation
of access and interconnection across all communications
infrastructures (ensuring new entrants can compete
effectively).
A Spectrum Policy Expert Group will be established at Community
level to ensure that political and not just technical
considerations drive Community policy in this area.
Ensuring affordable access for all to communications services
necessary for participation in the Information Society remains a
key priority for the Commission. In addition to funding public
access from State budgets (e.g. for schools and libraries), Member
States will retain the option of establishing the financing schemes
for universal service (compensation of the universal service
provider via contributions from its competitors), although the type
of services funded by such schemes would have to be carefully
assessed. The Commission therefore proposes to maintain at this
stage the current definition and scope of universal service.
urgent action is required to increase competition in the local loop
(the term used to describe the line between the local exchange and
the subscriber's premises). The Commission willuse Recommendations,
and, in specific cases, the competition rules of the Treaty to
encourage local loop unbundling.
Inconsistent application of certain provisions of telecoms
legislation is hindering the development of effective competition
and the deployment of pan-European services. The Commission is not
persuaded that a regulatory body at EU level would currently add
sufficient value to justify the likely costs and therefore does not
propose the establishment of a European Regulatory Authority for
communications services at this stage. However, it states that
cooperation between the Commission and national regulators must
urgently be improved.
- type
- Non-legislative basic document published
- title
- COM(1999)0539
- body
- type
- Non-legislative basic document published
-
- date
- 1999-11-10
- docs
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1999&nu_doc=0539
- text
PURPOSE: to launch a review of EU regulation in
telecommunications and to put forward the main elements for a new
framework for communications infrastructure and associated
services.
CONTENT: The provisions of the current telecoms regulatory
framework liberalised all telecommunications services and networks
from 1 January 1998. This has transformed a sector traditionally
characterised by state monopolies into a dynamic industry ready to
take full advantage of the global market. However, the process is
not complete. The EU telecoms market remains fragmented and is
dominated by incumbent operators in all Member States,
notwithstanding the rapid development of competition, as
illustrated by falling tariffs and a growing number of operators.
The Review provides the opportunity to re-assess existing
regulation, to ensure that it reinforces the development of
competition and consumer choice, and to continue to safeguard
objectives of general interest.
The new framework will be a central building block of the EU policy
with respect to Information Society for the years to come. However,
it cannot be seen in isolation. Community policies have to combine
the establishment of an effective regulatory framework with
concrete actions to promote the emergence of an inclusive
Information Society. The Community intends to play an important
role in this process by introducing focused initiatives, such as
the e-Europe initiative.
The main elements of the Commission's policy proposals for a new
regulatory framework to cover all communications infrastructure and
associated services are presented. With these proposals the
Commission seeks to build on the successes of the current regime
and ensure that regulation at EU level continues to encourage the
development of a competitive single market and benefits the EU
citizen. Safeguarding Community interests in international
negotiations is also an important objective for the Commission and
Member States, in particular the forthcoming WTO negotiations where
further liberalisation of telecoms in other countries will be vital
to ensure that electronic commerce and the Internet can develop at
a global level.
The Commission's document states that five generally accepted
principles should underpin the new regulatory framework. Future
regulation should:
1) be based on clearly defined policy objectives;
2) be the minimum necessary to meet those objectives;
3) further enhance legal certainty in a dynamic market;
4) aim to be technologically neutral;
5) be enforced as closely as practicable to the activities being
regulated.
Currently, different rules apply to the regulation of different
communications infrastructure and associated services. But
convergence means the same services can be carried over any
transmission network, whether fixed or mobile, telecommunications
or cable TV, satellite or terrestrial. The new framework would
cover all communications infrastructure and associated services so
that equivalent rules apply to these networks. In practice, this
means the new framework would apply to: telecommunications
networks(fixed or mobile), satellite networks, cable TV networks,
and terrestrial broadcast networks, as well as to facilities such
as Application Program Interfaces, which control access to
services. This has important consequences. For example, national
regulators would apply the same licensing principles (of
transparency, non-discrimination, proportionality and objectivity)
when licensing all communications infrastructure and associated
services. It should be noted that where such associated services
are l;inked to services for the provision of content, there may be
a need for additional rules concerning that provision of
content.
These rules would, of course, be withour prejudice to regulatory
obligations (whether EU or national) which apply to the content of
broadcasting services or other information society services.
The new framework would continue to treat Internet transmission
services in the same way as other transmission services (i.e. no
Internet-specific measures are envisaged for the moment).
As regards licensing and authorisations, the current framework
allows Member States to insist on the use of individual licences
(which are specific to an individual operator and require the
operator to seek an explicit authorisation from a regulator before
it can begin operating. This degree of control on market entry
creates administrative barriers which may be dis-proportionate, and
has contributed to large variations in licence regimes in the EU.
The new framework would require operators providing communications
services to be licensed using general authorisations (i.e. no
requirement for explicit authorisation by a regulator before
providing services). Specific authorisations would remain necessary
for the use of radio spectrum and numbering resources. This
deregulated, harmonised framework would reduce the current
variation in licence regimes for telecoms across the EU, which is
holding back innovation, competition and the provision of
pan-European services.
The new framework would establish common principles for regulation
of access and interconnection across all communications
infrastructures (ensuring new entrants can compete
effectively).
A Spectrum Policy Expert Group will be established at Community
level to ensure that political and not just technical
considerations drive Community policy in this area.
Ensuring affordable access for all to communications services
necessary for participation in the Information Society remains a
key priority for the Commission. In addition to funding public
access from State budgets (e.g. for schools and libraries), Member
States will retain the option of establishing the financing schemes
for universal service (compensation of the universal service
provider via contributions from its competitors), although the type
of services funded by such schemes would have to be carefully
assessed. The Commission therefore proposes to maintain at this
stage the current definition and scope of universal service.
urgent action is required to increase competition in the local loop
(the term used to describe the line between the local exchange and
the subscriber's premises). The Commission willuse Recommendations,
and, in specific cases, the competition rules of the Treaty to
encourage local loop unbundling.
Inconsistent application of certain provisions of telecoms
legislation is hindering the development of effective competition
and the deployment of pan-European services. The Commission is not
persuaded that a regulatory body at EU level would currently add
sufficient value to justify the likely costs and therefore does not
propose the establishment of a European Regulatory Authority for
communications services at this stage. However, it states that
cooperation between the Commission and national regulators must
urgently be improved.
- type
- Non-legislative basic document
- title
- COM(1999)0539
- body
- EC
- commission
-
- DG
- Information Society and Media
- type
- Non-legislative basic document
-
- date
- 1999-11-23
- body
- CSL
- type
- Council Meeting
- council
- Culture
- meeting_id
- 2221
-
- date
- 2000-03-17
- body
- EP
- type
- Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
- committees
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- False
- committee
- CULT
- date
- 2000-03-27
- committee_full
- Culture, Youth, Education, Media and Sport
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- RIDRUEJO Mónica
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- False
- committee
- ENVI
- date
- 2000-04-03
- committee_full
- Environment, Public Health, Consumer Policy
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- JACKSON Caroline
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- True
- committee
- ITRE
- date
- 1999-12-07
- committee_full
- Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- VAN VELZEN W.G.
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- False
- committee
- JURI
- date
- 2000-03-28
- committee_full
- Legal Affairs and Internal Market
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- NIEBLER Angelika
-
- date
- 2000-05-03
- docs
-
- type
- Committee draft report
- title
- PE286.080
- body
- EP
- type
- Committee draft report
-
- date
- 2000-05-24
- docs
-
- url
- http://eescopinions.eesc.europa.eu/eescopiniondocument.aspx?language=EN&docnr=0582&year=2000
- type
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
- title
- CES0582/2000
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2000:204:SOM:EN:HTML
- type
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
- title
- OJ C 204 18.07.2000, p. 0006
- body
- ESOC
- type
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
-
- date
- 2000-05-25
- docs
-
- url
- http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-0145&language=EN
- type
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
- title
- A5-0145/2000
- body
- type
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
- date
- 2000-05-25
- docs
-
- url
- http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-0145&language=EN
- type
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
- title
- A5-0145/2000
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:067:SOM:EN:HTML
- type
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
- title
- OJ C 067 01.03.2001, p. 0009
- text
The committee adopted the report by W.G. van VELZEN (EPP/ED,
NL) on the Commission communication on creating a new regulatory
framework for electronic communications infrastructure and
associated services. Although it supported the Commission
proposals, the committee felt that there was a need for further
reflection on a number of issues, including the concept of
competition, the question of dealing with an imperfect market, the
proposed system of "significant market power and dominant
positions", general authorisation and radio spectrum auctions. On
the latter point, the committee felt that spectrum auctions should
be discouraged as they worked against the objectives of creating a
level playing field and guaranteeing services at affordable prices.
As not all Member States held auctions of UMTS frequencies, some
ICT companies obtained UMTS frequencies at far lower prices than
their competitors. Furthermore, auctions tended to raise licence
fees above economic value, raise consumer tariffs and hamper the
introduction of new services. The committee wanted the Member
States to use the revenues raised as a result of auctions, fees and
radio spectrum pricing to create better conditions for the
development of an information society and e-commerce in the EU.
While the committee agreed with the general principle of the new
framework proposed by the Commission (whereby national regulators
would apply the same licensing principles when licensing all
communications infrastructure and associated services and there
would be no requirement for explicit authorisation by a regulator
before providing services, except for the use of radio spectrum and
numbering resources), it nevertheless argued that sector-specific
regulation would still be required, for example for the regulation
of markets where effective competition was unlikely to emerge and
for the achievement of certain public policy objectives.
- body
- EP
- type
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
- date
- 2000-06-13
- docs
-
- url
- http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-0258
- text
The European Parliament adopted the resolution drafted by W.G.
van VELZEN (EPP/ED, Netherlands) on the Commission Communication on
electronic communciations infrastructure and associated services.
The Parliament welcomed the Commission's Communication, but
considered that further consideration of a number of themes is
required, including general authorisation and auctions. It
emphasised that in some Member States, no auctions of UMTS
frequencies are held, as a result of which some ICT companies
obtain UMTS frequencies at far lower prices than their competitors.
This does not create a level playing field. The influence of
governments on national ICT companies is regulated in very
different ways and this has constituted an obstacle to mergers
between European ICT companies. Parliament also asked for
guarantees, with respect to pluralism, diversity and quality
regarding the content of digital services, the protection of
consumers and minors, public information, advertising and the sale
of regulated products and intellectual property rights. The auction
of frequencies could increase the prices charged to consumers,
which would be contrary to the Lisbon decisions concerning an
information society accesible to all. The new framework must
maintain the possibility for Member States to establish schemes to
compensate the universal service provider, if provision is an
unfair burden on the operator.
- type
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
- title
- T5-0258/2000
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:067:SOM:EN:HTML
- type
- Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
- title
- OJ C 067 01.03.2001, p. 0024-0053
- body
- EP
- type
- Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
-
- date
- 2001-03-01
- type
- Final act published in Official Journal
| |