| added | activities | -
- date
- 2000-04-14
- docs
-
- url
- http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&typ=Advanced&cmsid=639&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=7797%2F00&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=100
- text
This document comprises an explanatory note from the
Portuguese Republic regarding its initiative for a Framework
Decision on the standing of victims in criminal procedure.
The proposed Framework Decision has its origins in the provisions
in the Treaty on European Union relating to an area of freedom,
security and justice, the Action Plan of the Council and the
Commission on how best to implement the Treaty's provisions on
these aspects, and the Commission's July 1999 Communication
entitled 'Crime victims in the European Union: reflection on
standards and action'.
The guiding principles followed in drawing up the draft Framework
Decision have been to:
- focus on addressing the basic issue for citizens of access to
justice as regards the standing of victims in criminal procedure
and related matters;
- take an initiative by way of a proposal for a Framework Decision
as the form best suited to a subject involving per se the need for
approximation of legislative and regulatory provisions;
- find some initial common ground on the type of initiative, the
need for it and its scope, as done form January 2000 onwards in
liaison with Portugal's three successors in the Presidency, the
Commission, the General Secretariat of the Council and the European
Forum for victim support groups.
The results of the strategy established show that:
1) the importance of an integrated approach to the issue of victims
in the context of access to justice have been pointed out and
acknowledged, leaving the alternative of putting forward individual
proposal to resolve problems faced by victims, which would in
particular fail to live up to the decisions taken in Tampere;
2) in this context, in the course of criminal procedure and
directly related aspects, the proposals put forward are designed to
address the points identified as essential to a proper response to
victims' needs;
3) all the subjects identified by the Commission communication as
needing to be addressed have been covered as part of a consistent
approach to the need for approximation of laws and
regulations.
The main provisions of the proposal for a Framework Decision deal
with:
- the treatment of victims with respect and dignity at all levels
of the criminal procedure, incluing the protection of their privacy
and safety,
- the availability of contact persons in court to assist victims
and witnesses with matters in relation to the procedure and/or,
depending on the jurisdiction, other services available for support
and advice, bearing in mind also the requisite cooperation of
victim support groups and the need for 'procedure' to be broadly
construed,
- making it possible for a foreign victim to participate adequately
in a procedure,
- the availablity of court premises, such as separate waiting
rooms, assuring that a victim or witness does not have to confront
the offender more than necessary,
- the restitution of stolen property to victims as early as
possible,
- additional research and experiments in victim-offender mediation
with evaluation of the particular interests of victims, as well as
practical arrangements for mediation.
The approach taken to the issue of victims throughout the draft
Articles stems from the realisation that, in dealing with the
position of victims generally in criminal procedure and
particularly victims resident in another country, there can be no
getting away from the central focus on victims as individuals and
on what they go through in relation to the responses which they
receive, in various ways, from various sources, before reporting an
offence, in the course of procedure and at the enforcement stage
after judgment has been given.
Hence the importance attached in the draft to the involvement of
victim support groups, training of personnel coming into contact
with victims, networks of contact points, specific aspects of
compensation in criminal procedure, without seeking to deal
exhaustively with this subject, which needs to be covered in full
separately, and the use of mediation in procedure.
- type
- Document attached to the procedure
- title
- 07797/2000
- body
- CSL
- type
- Document attached to the procedure
-
- date
- 2000-07-20
- docs
-
- url
- http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&typ=Advanced&cmsid=639&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=9650%2F00&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=100
- text
PURPOSE: Portuguese initiative regarding the adoption of a
Framework Decision on the standing of victims in criminal
procedure.
CONTENT: It was agreed at the Tampere European Council in October
1999 that minimum standards should be drawn up on the protection of
the victims of crimes, in particular on crime victims' access to
justice and on their right to compensation for damages, including
legal costs. In addition, national programmes should be set up to
finance measures, public and non-governmental, for assistance to
and protection of victims.
The guiding principles used in drawing up the draft Framework
Decision have been to:
- focus on addressing the basic issue for citizens of access to
justice as regards the standing of victims in criminal procedure
and related matters, as pointed out in the Commission's 14 July
1999 communication entitled 'Crime victims in the European Union:
reflections on standards and action';
- take an initiative by way of a proposal for a Framework Decision
as the best form suited to a subject involving per se the need for
approximation of legislative and regulatory provisions;
- find some initial common ground on the type of initiative, the
need for it and its scope, as done from january 2000 onwards in
liaison with Portugal's three successors in the Presidency, the
Commission, the General Secretariat of the Council and the European
Forum for Victim Support Groups.
The main provisions of the Framework Decision cover:
- definitions of 'victim', 'victim support group' and
'procedure';
- respect and recognition: Member States are required to ensure
that victims are treated with respect for the dignity of the
individual and to recognise the rights and legitimate interests of
victims at all stages of procedure. Appropriate measures shall be
taken for victims who are particularly vulnerable on account of
their age, their sex or other circumstances;
- right to provide information: the right of victims to be heard in
the procedure and their right to furnish evidence must be
safeguarded by Member States;
- right to receive information: victims must have access to
information of relevance for the protection of their interests from
the outset;
- communication safeguards: Member States are required to take
necessary measures to prevent language difficulties, or inadequate
powers of expression or comprehension, from impeding either
victims' direct or indirect understanding of important steps in the
procedure or any involvement of victims in such steps, particularly
through the use of appropriate interpreting and communication
facilities;
- right to participate in the procedure and have access to legal
aid: Member States must ensure that all victims, regardless of
their means, have access to legal advice, provided free of charge,
if need be;
- legal costs: Member States shall not require victims to pay any
legal costs or shall arrange for the possibility of having such
costs refunded;
- right to a suitable level of protection for crime victims and
their families or persons in a similar position, particularly
asregards their safety and protection of their privacy, where there
is a serious risk of reprisals or firm evidence of intent to
intrude upon their privacy;
- right to compensation under criminal procedure: Member States
shall ensure that victims have the option of seeking compensation
in the course of criminal procedure;
- dispute settlement through mediation, where deemed
appropriate;
- victims resident in another Member State must be able to
participate properly in the criminal procedure, being placed at a
minimum of disadvantage as a result of their place of
residence;
- the role of specialist services and victim support groups;
- training for personnel involved in the proicedure or coming into
contact with victims.
- type
- Legislative proposal
- title
- 09650/2000
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2000:243:SOM:EN:HTML
- type
- Legislative proposal
- title
- OJ C 243 24.08.2000, p. 0004
- body
- CSL
- type
- Legislative proposal
-
- date
- 2000-07-20
- docs
-
- url
- http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&typ=Advanced&cmsid=639&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=9650%2F00&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=100
- text
PURPOSE: Portuguese initiative regarding the adoption of a
Framework Decision on the standing of victims in criminal
procedure.
CONTENT: It was agreed at the Tampere European Council in October
1999 that minimum standards should be drawn up on the protection of
the victims of crimes, in particular on crime victims' access to
justice and on their right to compensation for damages, including
legal costs. In addition, national programmes should be set up to
finance measures, public and non-governmental, for assistance to
and protection of victims.
The guiding principles used in drawing up the draft Framework
Decision have been to:
- focus on addressing the basic issue for citizens of access to
justice as regards the standing of victims in criminal procedure
and related matters, as pointed out in the Commission's 14 July
1999 communication entitled 'Crime victims in the European Union:
reflections on standards and action';
- take an initiative by way of a proposal for a Framework Decision
as the best form suited to a subject involving per se the need for
approximation of legislative and regulatory provisions;
- find some initial common ground on the type of initiative, the
need for it and its scope, as done from january 2000 onwards in
liaison with Portugal's three successors in the Presidency, the
Commission, the General Secretariat of the Council and the European
Forum for Victim Support Groups.
The main provisions of the Framework Decision cover:
- definitions of 'victim', 'victim support group' and
'procedure';
- respect and recognition: Member States are required to ensure
that victims are treated with respect for the dignity of the
individual and to recognise the rights and legitimate interests of
victims at all stages of procedure. Appropriate measures shall be
taken for victims who are particularly vulnerable on account of
their age, their sex or other circumstances;
- right to provide information: the right of victims to be heard in
the procedure and their right to furnish evidence must be
safeguarded by Member States;
- right to receive information: victims must have access to
information of relevance for the protection of their interests from
the outset;
- communication safeguards: Member States are required to take
necessary measures to prevent language difficulties, or inadequate
powers of expression or comprehension, from impeding either
victims' direct or indirect understanding of important steps in the
procedure or any involvement of victims in such steps, particularly
through the use of appropriate interpreting and communication
facilities;
- right to participate in the procedure and have access to legal
aid: Member States must ensure that all victims, regardless of
their means, have access to legal advice, provided free of charge,
if need be;
- legal costs: Member States shall not require victims to pay any
legal costs or shall arrange for the possibility of having such
costs refunded;
- right to a suitable level of protection for crime victims and
their families or persons in a similar position, particularly
asregards their safety and protection of their privacy, where there
is a serious risk of reprisals or firm evidence of intent to
intrude upon their privacy;
- right to compensation under criminal procedure: Member States
shall ensure that victims have the option of seeking compensation
in the course of criminal procedure;
- dispute settlement through mediation, where deemed
appropriate;
- victims resident in another Member State must be able to
participate properly in the criminal procedure, being placed at a
minimum of disadvantage as a result of their place of
residence;
- the role of specialist services and victim support groups;
- training for personnel involved in the proicedure or coming into
contact with victims.
- type
- Legislative proposal published
- title
- 09650/2000
- body
- EC
- commission
- type
- Legislative proposal published
-
- date
- 2000-09-04
- body
- EP
- type
- Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
- committees
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- False
- committee
- FEMM
- date
- 2000-09-14
- committee_full
- Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- SMET Miet
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- False
- committee
- JURI
- date
- 2000-10-17
- committee_full
- Legal Affairs and Internal Market
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- True
- committee
- LIBE
- date
- 2000-09-14
- committee_full
- Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PSE
- name
- CERDEIRA MORTERERO Carmen
-
- body
- CSL
- meeting_id
- 2288
- text
The Council examined a draft framework on the protection of
the victims of crime. During this examination Ministers noted that
two substantive reservations remain, one relating to the conditions
governing the grant of compensation in criminal proceedings, the
other to constitutional issues which this proposal poses for
certain delegations.
The Presidency asked the Permanent Representatives Committee to
continue discussions on the draft framework decision with a view to
reaching a political agreement as soon as possible.
- council
- Justice and Home Affairs (JHA)
- date
- 2000-09-28
- type
- Council Meeting
-
- date
- 2000-11-14
- docs
-
- type
- Committee draft report
- title
- PE294.247
- body
- EP
- type
- Committee draft report
-
- body
- EP
- committees
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- False
- committee
- FEMM
- date
- 2000-09-14
- committee_full
- Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- SMET Miet
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- False
- committee
- JURI
- date
- 2000-10-17
- committee_full
- Legal Affairs and Internal Market
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PPE-DE
- name
- LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
-
- body
- EP
- responsible
- True
- committee
- LIBE
- date
- 2000-09-14
- committee_full
- Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
- rapporteur
-
- group
- PSE
- name
- CERDEIRA MORTERERO Carmen
- docs
-
- url
- http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2000-0355&language=EN
- type
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
- title
- A5-0355/2000
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:232:SOM:EN:HTML
- type
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
- title
- OJ C 232 17.08.2001, p. 0007
- text
The committee adopted the report by Carmen CERDEIRA MORTERERO
(PES, E) amending the proposal under the consultation procedure. It
wanted to ensure that victims of crime had easy access to the
judicial system so that they could receive treatment corresponding
as closely as possible to their particular situation. It called for
particular attention to be paid to groups which were especially
vulnerable owing to their age, gender or other reasons and urged
the Member States to ensure that their authorities should question
victims only on such matters as were strictly necessary for the
proper conduct of the penal procedure. The rights and needs of
children who were victims of crime should be taken into particular
account. The committee also wanted information to be available to
victims in all the Community languages so that they could be
provided with full information even where a crime was committed
outside their usual country of residence. Victims should be able to
find out details of all ways and means open to them to defend their
rights and interests. In addition, compensation for any damage
suffered should if possible be paid by the perpetrator of the
crime.
The committee also wanted Member States to take steps to ensure
that, in cases where victims might be at risk, they were informed
of the release of the person arrested or sentenced for the crime
against them and of any other circumstance which might give cause
for concern. Similarly, it wanted to ensure that victims were not
obliged to confront offenders in the premises where legal
proceedings took place. Lastly, it wanted to delete the provision
whereby victims could testify by means of video recordings (as
opposed to video conferencing), arguing that the right of the
accused to a fair trial included the right to put questions
directly to witnesses for the prosecution.
- date
- 2000-11-23
- type
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
-
- date
- 2000-12-11
- body
- EP
- type
- Debate in Parliament
-
- date
- 2000-12-12
- docs
-
- url
- http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2000-0550
- text
The European Parliament approved the text drafted by Mrs
Carmen CERDEIRA MORERERO (PES, E) together with a number of
amendments. (Refer to the previous document for a guideline of the
amendments tabled by the committee responsible and which were
subsequently approved by the House).
- type
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
- title
- T5-0550/2000
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:232:SOM:EN:HTML
- type
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
- title
- OJ C 232 17.08.2001, p. 0036-0072
- body
- EP
- type
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
- date
- 2001-03-15
- body
- type
- Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
-
- date
- 2001-03-15
- body
- CSL
- type
- Council Meeting
- council
- Justice and Home Affairs (JHA)
- meeting_id
- 2337
-
- date
- 2001-03-15
- body
- EP
- type
- End of procedure in Parliament
-
- date
- 2001-03-22
- text
PURPOSE: to establish provisions on the standing of victims in
criminal proceedings.
COMMUNITY MEASURE: Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA on the
standing of victims in criminal proceedings.
The Council adopted a Framework Decision on the standing of victims
in criminal proceedings, following an initiative of the Portuguese
Republic.
The Framework Decision provides in particular that :
- Member States should approximate their laws and regulations to
the extent necessary to attain the objective of affording victims
of crime a high level of protection, irrespective of the Member
State in which they are present.
- Victims' needs should be considered and addressed in a
comprehensive, co-ordinated manner, avoiding partial or
inconsistent solutions which may give rise to secondary
victimisation. The provisions of this framework Decision are
therefore not confined to attending to the victim's interests under
criminal proceedings proper. They also cover certain measures to
assist victims before or after criminal proceedings, which might
mitigate the effects of the crime.
- Measures to assist victims of crime, and in particular the
provisions regarding compensation and mediation do not concern
arrangements under civil procedure.
- The rules and practices as regards the standing and main rights
of victims need to be approximated, with particular regard to the
right to be treated with respect for their dignity, the right to
provide and receive information, the right to understand and be
understood, the right to be protected at the various stages of
procedure and the right to have allowance made for the disadvantage
of living in a different Member State from the one in which the
crime was committed.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: The Framework Decision entered into force on 22
March 2001. The majority of the provisions are required to be
transposed into national legislation by 22 March 2002. However, the
provisions relating to mediation procedures have to enter into
force no later than 22 March 2006. The measures regarding
communication safeguards and specific assistance to the victim
shall enter into force no later than 22 March 2004. It should also
be noted that this Framework Decision also applies to
Gibraltar.
- type
- Final act published in Official Journal
-
- date
- 2004-03-03
- docs
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=0054
- text
Article 18 of the Council Framework Decision on the standing
of victims in criminal proceedings requires the Commission, based
on information received from the Member States, to prepare a report
on the implementation of the Framework Decision into national law.
The Commission Report is then to be forwarded to the Council for
further consideration and consultation. Based on the contents of
the Report the Council will need to evaluate the extent to which
Member States have adopted the rules necessary to conform to the
Framework Decision. This Commission Communication is the result of
the obligations specified in Article 18.
The Commission laments the late and, in some cases incomplete,
responses it received from the Member States - this in spite of the
deadline being extended. At the time the Report was drafted only
ten Member States had sent "relatively" complete contributions on
the implementation of the Framework Decision into national
legislation. Denmark sent no contribution. The Commission states
therefore that the analysis is fragmentary.
When evaluating the implementation of the Framework Decision the
Commission recognises the subtle, yet distinct, difference between
the implementation requirements of a Framework Decision and a
Directive.
The general objective of the Framework Decision is to guarantee
that victims throughout the EU have access to a comparable high
level of protection; irrespective of the Member State is which they
are present. Member States must therefore seek to approximate their
rules and practices as regards the standing and rights of victims
with particular regard to the right to be treated with respect for
their dignity, the right to provide and receive information, the
right to understand and be understood, the right to be protected at
the various stages of procedure and the right to have allowance
made for the disadvantage of living in a different Member State
from the one in which the crime was committed.
Based on the replies it received from the Member States the
Commission Communication evaluates step-by-step,
article-by-article, the ways in which Member States have sought to
approximate their rules and provisions to the objectives set out in
the Framework Decision.
Having examined in detail, which Member States have implemented
correctly, or otherwise, their obligations under the Framework
Decision, the Commission, in its overall conclusions, suggests that
the evaluation is superficial in nature - thanks in large part to
the incomplete responses received. Nevertheless, this superficial
impression made it possible to conclude that the correct state of
transposal of the Decision is unsatisfactory. At the same time
however, the Commission recognises that in certain Member States,
such as France and Luxembourg, the transposal process is already in
hand for some of the provisions. For example, France has notified a
programme of fourteen victim-related measures that are to be
developed over the next five years. In addition, the Commission
accepts that the nature of the Decision leaves Member States
considerable room for manoeuvre, making it difficult for the
Commission to assess whether it has been properly transposed or
not. In order not to repeat delays inthe following Report the
Commission invites Member States to ensure a rapid and complete
transposal of the Framework Decision and to inform it of this
immediately, no later than 15 March 2004 providing a description of
the measures taken.
- title
- COM(2004)0054
- type
- Follow-up document
- celexid
- CELEX:52004DC0054:EN
- body
- EC
- commission
- type
- Follow-up document
-
- date
- 2009-04-20
- docs
-
- url
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=0166
- text
This report from the Commission is pursuant to
Article 18 of the Council Framework Decision of 15 March
2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings
(2001/220/JHA).
According to Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA
on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings, the Commission
is required to draw up a report on the implementation measures
taken by Member States. The Commission published a first report in
February 2004 which examined transposition as of 25 March 2003 when
only Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany, Italy, Ireland,
Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain and Sweden had sent relatively complete
contributions on transposition into their national
legislation.
This final report takes into account implementation of
all Articles of the Framework Decision as at 15 February 2008
in all 27 Member States.
State of transposition:
despite Article 18 laying down an obligation for Member States
to submit implementing legislation to the Commission by
22 March 2006, in November 2007 only 13 Member States
(Austria, Denmark, Germany, Spain, Luxembourg, the Netherlands,
Portugal, Sweden, the UK, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania
and Poland) had sent relatively complete contributions. The
Commission sent reminders to Member States and the final deadline
was set at 15 February 2008. This report is based on the
transposition situation on 15 February 2008, almost two years
after the 22 March 2006 deadline.
Two Member States (Malta and Greece) did not submit
legislation and, therefore, the Commission cannot assess whether
they have implemented the Framework Decision.
Latvia sent a set of national provisions in Latvian on
12 December 2007 and further provisions on 6 March 2008
(after the deadline), without a description of the national
implementing measures or explanatory notes. Therefore, the
Commission cannot assess whether Latvia has fulfilled the
obligation as set out in Article 18. Other Member States
submitted national provisions that purport to implement the
Framework Decision, in full or in part. Luxembourg informed the
Commission that the Bill referred to in the first report has still
not become law. It will not be taken into account in the assessment
of the implementation by Luxembourg. The UK states that it covers
England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, but the UK sent an
additional contribution regarding transposition in Scotland (the
Scottish system is mentioned specifically where it differs from the
general provisions for the rest of the UK).
No Member State transposed the Framework Decision in a
single piece of national legislation. Member States all relied on
existing provisions and many referred to their Code of Criminal
Procedure for transposition. A few adopted new legislation covering
one or more Articles. Many Member States submitted non-binding
codes, Instructions and charters in lieu of legislation. Moreover,
several Member States have covered the provisions piecemeal by
virtue of overlap with a variety of existing national provisions or
newly adopted national provisions.
Main conclusions of the report: the Commission report concludes that the
implementation of this Framework Decision is not
satisfactory. The national legislation sent to the Commission
contains numerous omissions. Moreover, it largely reflects existing
practice prior to adoption of the Framework Decision. The aim of
harmonising legislation in this field has not been achieved owing
to the wide disparity in national laws. Many provisions have been
implemented by way of non-binding guidelines, charters and
recommendations. The Commission cannot assess whether these are
adhered to in practice.
Therefore, the Commission invites Member States to
consider this report and to take the opportunity to provide all
further relevant information to the Commission and to the Council
Secretariat, in order to fulfil their obligations under
Article 18 of the Framework Decision. In addition, the
Commission encourages those Member State that have indicated that
they are preparing relevant legislation, to enact and submit these
national measures as soon as possible.
- title
- COM(2009)0166
- type
- Follow-up document
- celexid
- CELEX:52009DC0166:EN
-
- url
- http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/0476/COM_SEC(2009)0476_EN.pdf
- type
- Follow-up document
- title
- SEC(2009)0476
- body
- EC
- commission
- type
- Follow-up document
| |