2012/2078(INI)
Constitutional problems of a multitier governance in the European Union
Constitutional problems of a multitier governance in the European Union 2012/2078(INI)
Next event: 2013/11/18 Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
Lead committee dossier: AFCO/7/08793
Legal basis: RoP 048
Next event: 2013/11/18 Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
| AFCO | ECON | EMPL | REGI | |
| Lead Rapporteur |
TRZASKOWSKI Rafał (EPP),
GUALTIERI Roberto (S&D) |
|||
| Opinion Rapporteur(s) | GOULARD Sylvie (ALDE) | HUGHES Stephen (S&D) |
Legal basis: RoP 048
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
2012/2078(INI) Constitutional problems of a multitier governance in the European Union
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2013/11/18
Lead committee dossier: AFCO/7/08793
Legal Basis RoP 048
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2013/11/18
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | AFCO | TRZASKOWSKI Rafał (EPP), GUALTIERI Roberto (S&D) | DUFF Andrew (ALDE), HÄFNER Gerald (Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley (ECR), SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo (GUE/NGL), MESSERSCHMIDT Morten (EFD) |
| Opinion | ECON | GOULARD Sylvie (ALDE) | |
| Opinion | EMPL | HUGHES Stephen (S&D) | |
| Opinion | REGI |
Legal Basis RoP 048
Subjects
Activites
-
2013/11/18
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
- 2012/05/24 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 52 |
2012/2078(INI) Constitutional problems of a multitier governance in the European Union
2013/02/26
ECON
52 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Recalls that the euro is the currency of the European Union, and that all member states except those with a derogation, have vocation to join the euro in due course.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Recalls that the European Parliament is the Parliament of the European Union, the sole seat of the Union's direct democratic legitimacy and the recipient of the Union's direct democratic accountability.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Member States sharing the euro need to further strengthen stability, efficiency, transparency, democratic legitimacy and democratic accountability;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Member States sharing the euro need to
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Member States sharing the euro need to further strengthen compliance with the Treaty, stability, efficiency and democratic accountability;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Member States sharing the euro need to further strengthen competitiveness, stability, efficiency and democratic accountability;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that Member States sharing the euro and those committed to adopting it need to further strengthen stability, efficiency and democratic accountability;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Believes that the community method should be used for all measures aiming at reinforcing the European Monetary Union; calls for the Fiscal Compact to be integrated into the EU treaties as soon as possible;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that part of the efforts made to mitigate the crisis, such as
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that part of the efforts made to mitigate the crisis, such as the adoption of the Six-Pack and the creation of the EFSM, the EFSF and the ESM, only concern the euro area Member States; The operations of the EFSF/ESM and any future similar structure should be subject to regular democratic control and oversight by the European Parliament.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that part of the efforts made to mitigate the crisis, such as the adoption of the Six-Pack and the creation of the ESM, only concern the euro area Member States; takes the view that the ESM should be enshrined in the acquis communautaire;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes that two Member States have opt-outs from the introduction of the euro and two Member States have opt-outs from the implementation of the Schengen acquis;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Notes that enhanced cooperation provides a legal basis for the adoption of measures that only apply to a limited number of Member States; notes that this mechanism is being used already for trans-EU divorce law and for European patent law, and was approved by the European Parliament and the Council in the taxation context for the establishment of a Financial Transaction Tax;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the euro area and open to all other EU Member States; considers that, to overcome the structural deficiencies inherent in the economic and monetary union and to effectively curb the pervasive moral hazard, the proposed 'banking union' should draw on the earlier reform of the Union financial services sector, including the creation of EBA, ESMA, EIOPA and the ESRB, as well as the strengthened economic governance, especially in the euro area, and the new budgetary framework of the European Semester, to ensure greater resilience and competitiveness of the Union banking sector, increased confidence in it, and enhanced capital reserves to prevent Member States' public budgets having to bear the costs of banks' bail-outs in the future;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the euro area and open to all other EU Member States; believes that the single supervisory mechanism should be made accountable to the European Parliament, given the latter's mandate as the only European directly elected democratic institution; the Chairperson should be approved by the EP and should regularly report back to the EP;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the euro area and open to all other EU Member States and expects the formula of regulation developed on this occasion – as part of which Economic and Monetary Union is strengthened by harmonising financial regulation whilst also leaving the door open for all the Member States concerned, in particular those covered by the derogation laid down in Article 139(1) TFEU – to also be the default formula used in future;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the euro area and open to all other EU Member States; regards as extremely risky and legally questionable, however, the fact that ultimate responsibility for banking supervision is to lie solely with the ECB;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the euro area and open to all other EU Member States; stresses that establishing a European bank resolution mechanism is an indispensible step in setting up a genuine banking union;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the on-going creation of a single supervisory mechanism covering the euro area and open to all other EU Member States; demands that the SSM is subjected to full democratic control and oversight by the European Parliament
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that some Member States’
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that the Troika sets some Member States’ economic policies
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that some Member States' economic policies are constrained by the Troïka, which is not held properly accountable; is of the opinion that the Troika should be made answerable to the European Parliament, by means of regular reporting; commits to presenting systematic suggestions for the activity of the Troika;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that some Member States' economic policies are constrained by the Troïka, which is not held properly accountable
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Notes that fiscal consolidation efforts directed to comply with the new economic governance rules should be shared between the different administrations in a fair way, taking into account the services they provide.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Commission’s ‘Blueprint’; calls on the Commission to
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Commission's ‘Blueprint’; calls on the Commission to make legislative proposals under codecision for its implementation without delay, first and foremost with respect to the creation of a fiscal capacity for the eurozone, managed according to the community method;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Commission's
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Commission’s ‘Blueprint’; calls on the Commission to make legislative proposals as soon as possible under codecision for its implementation without delay;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that there must be legal certainty with regard to the concept of ‘contractual agreements’ applicable only to individual Member States as referred to in the European Council conclusions of December 2012
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that the concept of ‘contractual agreements’ applicable only to individual Member States as referred to in the European Council conclusions of December 2012 risks creating legal uncertainty
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that the concept of ‘contractual agreements’ applicable only to individual Member States as referred to in the European Council conclusions of December 2012 risks creating legal uncertainty and a democratic deficit given the lack of transparent procedures;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the work on
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the work on own resources should be accelerated, through measures including the Financial Transaction Tax, as should that on labour mobility, a
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the work on own resources should be substantially accelerated, as should that to set up a mechanism to deal with asymmetric shocks, as well as on labour mobility and a euro area budget, to make it an optimal currency area;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Reminds that a lot has to be done to make the single market fully operational;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that Article 3.4 TEU states
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that Article 3.4 TEU states ‘the Union shall establish an economic and monetary union whose currency is the euro’, and Protocol 14 on the Eurogroup foresees ‘the need to lay down special provisions for enhanced dialogue between the Member States whose currency is the euro, pending the euro becoming the currency of all Member States’;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that Article 3.4 TEU states ‘the Union shall establish an economic and monetary union whose currency is the euro’, and Protocol 14 on the Eurogroup foresees ‘the need to lay down special provisions for enhanced dialogue between the Member States whose currency is the euro, pending the euro becoming the currency of all Member States’;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that Article 3.4 TEU states
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that Article 3.4 TEU states ‘the Union shall establish an economic and monetary union whose currency is the euro’, and Protocol 14 on the Eurogroup foresees ‘the need to lay down special provisions for enhanced dialogue between the Member States whose currency is the euro, pending the euro becoming the currency of all Member States’; if this supposedly transitory situation is to last,
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Therefore calls for the immediate set up of a sub-committee within the European Parliament, tasked with scrutiny related to specifically eurozone matters,
source: PE-506.084
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| activities/1 | added |
|
|


