2011/0366(COD)
Asylum and Migration Fund 2014-2020
| AFET | BUDG | DEVE | EMPL | LIBE | |
| Lead Rapporteur | GUILLAUME Sylvie (S&D) | ||||
| Opinion Rapporteur(s) | HOHLMEIER Monika (EPP) | STRIFFLER Michèle (EPP) |
Legal basis: TFEU TFEU 078-p2 , TFEU TFEU 079-p2 , TFEU TFEU 079-p4
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opinion | AFET | ||
| Opinion | BUDG | HOHLMEIER Monika (EPP) | |
| Opinion | DEVE | STRIFFLER Michèle (EPP) | |
| Opinion | EMPL | ||
| Lead | LIBE | GUILLAUME Sylvie (S&D) | PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios (EPP), MULDER Jan (ALDE), TAVARES Rui (Verts/ALE), KIRKHOPE Timothy (ECR), VERGIAT Marie-Christine (GUE/NGL) |
Legal Basis TFEU TFEU 078-p2, TFEU TFEU 079-p2, TFEU TFEU 079-p4
Activites
- 2012/09/21 Amendments tabled in committee
- 2012/06/26 Committee draft report
- 2011/12/15 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2011/11/15
Legislative proposal
-
COM(2011)0751
summary
PURPOSE: to establish a Asylum and Migration Fund which takes over from the European Refugee Fund, the European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals and the European Return Fund of the previous programming period. PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. BACKGROUND: the policies relating to the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice have been growing steadily over the last years. Their importance has been confirmed by the Stockholm Programme and its Action Plan, the implementation of which is a strategic priority for the next five years and covers areas such as migration (legal migration and integration; asylum; irregular migration and return), security (prevention of and fight against terrorism and organised crime; police cooperation) and management of the external borders (including visa policy), as well as the external dimension of these policies. The Commission adopted a proposal for the next Multi-Annual Financial Framework for the period 2014-2020: a budget for delivering the Europe 2020 strategy. In the area of home affairs policies, covering security, migration and the management of external borders, the Commission proposed to simplify the structure of the expenditure instruments by reducing the number of programmes to a two pillar structure: an Asylum and Migration Fund and an Internal Security Fund. This Regulation establishes the Asylum and Migration Fund which draws on the capacity building process developed with the assistance of the European Refugee Fund4, the European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals5 and the European Return Fund and extends it to cover more comprehensively different aspects of the common Union asylum and immigration policy. Recent events at the Greek/Turkish border and in the Southern Mediterranean have also demonstrated how important it is for the Union to have a comprehensive approach to migration, covering various aspects such as: strengthened border management and Schengen governance, better targeted legal migration, enhanced dissemination of best practices on integration, a reinforced Common European Asylum System, and a more strategic approach to relations with third countries on migration. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: in accordance with the greater emphasis placed on evaluation as a tool to inform policy making, this proposal is informed by evaluation results, stakeholder consultation and impact assessment. Work on the preparation of the future financial instruments for home affairs started in 2010 and continued into 2011. It was completed in July 2011 and brought together available evaluation results for the existing financial instruments and informed the problems, objectives and policy options, including their likely impact, examined in the impact assessment. On the basis of this study, the Commission drafted an impact assessment report. The main conclusion may be summarised as follows: to broaden the scope of action for Union funding in the field of asylum and migration, including as regards its external dimension, to work towards more simplification of delivery mechanisms and greater flexibility, notably to respond to emergencies. In the area of asylum and migration, stakeholders considered that the broad thematic priorities have already been fixed by the Stockholm Programme and its Action Plan. There was broad support to reduce the number of financial instruments to a two-Fund structure on the condition that this would actually lead to simplification. LEGAL BASIS: Articles 78(2) and 79(2) and (4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the proposed Regulation establishes for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 the Asylum and Migration Fund. General objective: the general objective of the Fund shall be to contribute to an effective management of migration flows in the Union as part of the area of freedom, security and justice, in accordance with the common policy on asylum, subsidiary protection and temporary protection and the common immigration policy. Specific objectives: within its general objective, the Fund shall contribute to the following specific objectives: to strengthen and develop the Common European Asylum System, including its external dimension; to support legal migration to the Union in line with the economic and social needs of Member States and promote the effective integration of third-country nationals, including of asylum seekers and beneficiaries of international protection; to enhance fair and effective return strategies in the Member States with emphasis on sustainability of return and effective readmission in the countries of origin; to enhance the solidarity and responsibility sharing between the Member States, in particular towards those most affected by migration and asylum flows. For each of these objectives, key indicators are defined. Actions in or in relation to third countries: the Fund shall support actions catering primarily for Union interests, having a direct impact in the Union and its Member States and ensuring a necessary continuity with activities implemented in the territory of the Union. Actions that are directly development oriented shall not be supported through this Fund. In implementing such actions, full coherence will be sought with the principles and general objectives of the Union external action related to the country or region in question. Implementation: the specific implementing measures are laid down in a separate Regulation (Horizontal Regulation). Resources for Member States: the most important part of the resources available under the Fund will be channelled through national programmes of Member States covering the whole period 2014-2020. For this purpose, the amount of resources to be allocated to the Member States within the Fund will be composed of a basic amount and a variable amount. Following a mid-term review an additional amount may be allocated as of budget year 2018. (1) Basic amount: the basic amount is established on the basis of latest available statistical data relating to the migration flows, such as the number of first asylum applications, positive decisions granting refugee or subsidiary protection, number of resettled refugees, stock and flows of legally residing third-country nationals, number of return decisions issued by the national authorities and the number of effected returns. Those data are the same as those used so far for the calculation of allocations under the European Refugee Fund, the European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals and the European Return Fund. In order to ensure critical mass for the implementation of national programmes, EUR 5 million is added as a minimum amount to each Member State. The basic amounts earmarked to individual Member States will serve as a basis to start the policy dialogue, followed by the multiannual programming, to support, on the hand, a limited number of compulsory objectives (e.g. strengthening the establishment of Common European Asylum System by ensuring the efficient and uniform application of the Union acquis on asylum or developing an assisted voluntary return programme including a component on reintegration) and, on the other hand, to address the specific needs of each Member State. (2) Variable amount: the variable amount will be allocated following the policy dialogue mentioned above to those Member States willing to work in those operational fields which depend on their political commitment and willingness to act, or ability to cooperate with other Member States. This will be the case for the implementation of specific actions such as for: instance joint processing of asylum applications, joint return operations, setting up of joint migration centres, the implementation of resettlement and relocation operations. As regards resettlement: Member States will receive financial incentives (lump sums) every two years on the basis of their pledging which will follow the establishment of common Union resettlement priorities. These will be the result of a political process involving in particular the European Parliament and the Council and reflecting the policy developments at national and Union level. Through these financial incentives, two objectives are to be achieved: a quantitative one, i.e. to increase significantly the current resettlement figures which are too small, and a qualitative one, i.e. to strengthen the European dimension through the implementation of defined and dynamic common Union resettlement priorities. Moreover, based on a similar pledging exercise and at regular intervals, Member States will receive financial incentives (lump sums) for relocation of beneficiaries of international protection. Mid-term allocation: a part of available resources will be kept for mid-term review. This will, on the one hand, allow allocating additional amounts to those Member States undergoing significant changes in migration flows and presenting specific needs concerning their asylum and reception systems and, on the other hand, to allocate additional amounts to those Member States willing to implement specific actions. The latter may be revised in line with the most recent policy developments. Union Agencies: to use more effectively the competence and expertise of relevant Union agencies in the home affairs field, the Commission also envisages to make use of the possibility offered by the Financial Regulation to entrust, within the resources available under this Regulation, the implementation of specific tasks to such agencies, in the framework of their missions and in complementarity with their work programmes. For the tasks covered by this Regulation this concerns in particular the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) and the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex Agency) for activities in and outside the EU requiring operational expertise on issues related to asylum and irregular immigration, respectively. DELEGATED ACTS: in order to supplement or amend provisions of this Regulation on the lump sums for resettlement and relocation, the definition of specific actions and of common Union resettlement priorities, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the Commission's proposal for a Multi-Annual Financial Framework includes a proposal of EUR 3 869 million (in current prices) for Asylum and Migration Fund for the period 2014-2020. Indicatively more than 80% of this amount (EUR 3 232 million) should be used for national programmes of Member States while EUR 637 million should be centrally managed by the Commission to fund Union actions, emergency assistance, European Migration Network, technical assistance and the implementation of specific operational tasks by Union agencies.
- SEC(2011)1358
- SEC(2011)1359
- DG {u'url': u'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/', u'title': u'Home Affairs'}, MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
-
COM(2011)0751
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0751
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1358
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1359
- Committee draft report: PE491.289
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE494.640
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 78 |
2011/0366(COD) Asylum and Migration Fund 2014-2020
2012/06/21
AFET
13 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The Fund should prioritise and thus allocate a sufficient share of financial resources towards refugee integration in order to help the Member States meet the challenges of the creation of a common Asylum system.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The Fund should offer
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The Fund should support the efforts made by Member States to provide international protection and a durable solution in their territories to refugees and displaced persons identified as eligible for resettlement by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), such as the assessment of the resettlement needs and transfer of the persons concerned to their territories, with a view to granting them a secure legal status and to promoting their effective integration, by matching funds and resettlement places with the needs in the Regional Protection Programmes target regions.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Partnerships and cooperation with third countries to ensure the adequate management of inflows of persons applying for asylum or other forms of international protection are an essential component of Union asylum policy. With the aim to provide access to international protection and durable solutions at the earliest possible stage, including in the framework of Regional Protection Programmes14
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – subparagraph 2 The achievement of this objective shall be measured by indicators
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – subparagraph 2 a (new) In assessing the quality of asylum procedures, the ability of the responsible authorities in the asylum seekers’ countries of origin to cooperate with the authorities of host Member States shall be taken into account;
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – subparagraph 1 (b) to
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – subparagraph 2 Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d – subparagraph 1 (d) to enhance
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d – subparagraph 2 Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) setting up of administrative structures, systems and training of staff and relevant judicial authorities to ensure smooth access to asylum procedures for asylum seekers and efficient and quality asylum procedures; to this end, the European Asylum Curriculum must be maintained up-to-date and expanded to include other expert bodies, such as relevant civil society organisations, in its work.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) setting up and developing such integration strategies, including needs analysis, the improvement of integration indicators, and evaluation of the conditions particular to asylum-seekers, including participatory assessments, in order to identify best practices;
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) supporting the independent assessment and monitoring of return operations by civil society organisations, in order to ensure compliance with human rights;
source: PE-491.116
2012/07/16
DEVE
5 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The Fund should express solidarity through financial assistance to Member States. It should enhance the effective management of migration flows to the Union in areas where the Union adds maximum value, in particular by sharing responsibility between Member States and sharing responsibility and strengthening cooperation with third countries. Civil society organisations and local and regional authorities in the Member States and in third countries should participate in the process of programming, implementing and evaluating the multiannual programmes financed through this Fund. The European Parliament and the national parliaments of partner countries should also be informed and consulted in an appropriate way on the activities carried out under the Asylum and Migration Fund.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part (b) to support legal migration to the Union in line with the economic and social needs of Member States and promote the effective integration of third-country nationals and to strengthen the respect of human rights of migrants, including of asylum seekers and beneficiaries of international protection;
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – subparagraph 1 a (new) Civil society organisations, local and regional authorities and national parliaments in the Member States and in third countries shall be consulted during the process of programming, implementing and evaluating the programmes financed through this Fund.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) The Commission shall regularly monitor and examine the objectives of the Fund and evaluate the results of implementation, as well as the effectiveness of programming, through independent external evaluations, in order to ensure that the objectives have been achieved and to allow recommendations to be drawn up to improve future action. Proposals by the European Parliament or the Council for independent external evaluations shall be taken into due account. The Commission shall ensure that all stakeholders, including civil society, national parliaments and local authorities, are involved in the evaluation process for Union aid granted under this Regulation.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d – introductory part (d) to enhance the solidarity and responsibility sharing between the Member States, in particular towards those most affected by migration and asylum flows and to support a constant dialogue with civil society organisations for the development of national programmes.
source: PE-492.944
2012/07/31
BUDG
60 amendments...
Amendment 14 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Recalls its resolution of 8 June 2011 on Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe1; reiterates that sufficient additional resources are needed in the next MFF in order to enable the Union to fulfil its existing policy priorities and the new tasks provided for in the Treaty of Lisbon, as well as to respond to unforeseen events; points out that even with an increase in the level of resources for the next MFF of at least 5% compared to the 2013 level only a limited contribution can be made to the achievement of the Union’s agreed objectives and commitments and the principle of Union solidarity; challenges the Council, if it does not share this approach, to clearly identify which of its political priorities or projects could be dropped altogether, despite their proven European added value; _______________ 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0266.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The Union's objective to constitute an area of freedom, security and justice, should be achieved, inter alia, through common measures framing a policy on asylum and immigration, based on solidarity between Member States, which is fair towards third-countries and their nationals. The European Council of 2 December 2009 recognised that financial resources within the Union should be made increasingly flexible and coherent, both in terms of scope and of applicability, to support policy developments in the field of asylum and migration. It is regrettable that the appropriations proposed for the Asylum and Migration Fund are disproportionately lower than the appropriations proposed to the Instrument for financial support for police cooperation, prevention and combating crime and crisis management.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) In its resolution of 8 June 2011 on Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe1, the European Parliament stressed the need for an integrated approach towards pressing immigration and asylum questions as well as towards the management of the external borders of the Union, with sufficient funding and support tools to handle emergency situations made available in a spirit of respect for human rights and solidarity amongst all Member States, respecting national responsibilities and a clear definition of tasks. It further noted that, in this regard, the increased challenges of FRONTEX, the European Asylum Support Office and the Funds on Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows need to be duly taken into consideration. __________________ 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0266.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 b (new) (2b) In its resolution of 8 June 20111, the European Parliament further emphasised the need to develop better synergies between different funds and programmes and points to the fact that the simplification of the management of funds and allowing cross-financing enable the allocation of more funds to common objectives, welcomed the Commission's intention to reduce the total number of budgetary instruments in Home Affairs in a two pillar structure and where possible under shared management and expressed its belief that this approach should contribute significantly to an increased simplification, rationalisation, consolidation and transparency of the current funds and programmes. It stressed, however, the need to ensure that the different objectives of home affairs policies will not be mixed up. __________________ 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0266.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Partnerships and cooperation with third countries to ensure the adequate management of inflows of persons applying for asylum or other forms of international protection are a
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) To
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The Fund should support Member States in setting up strategies organising legal migration, enhancing their capacity to develop, implement, monitor and evaluate in general all immigration and integration strategies, policies and measures for third country nationals, including Union legal instruments. The Fund should also support the exchange of information, best practices and co-operation between different departments of administration as well as with other Member States. Technical assistance is essential to enable the Member States to support the implementation of their national programmes, assist beneficiaries in complying with their obligations and Union law and in turn to increase the visibility of and accessibility to EU funds.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The Fund should be implemented in full respect with the rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 and in other international instruments. In particular, eligible actions should take account of the specific situation of vulnerable persons,
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Measures in and in relation to third countries supported through the Fund should be taken in synergy and coherence with other actions outside the Union supported through Union external assistance instruments, both geographic and thematic. In particular, in implementing such actions full coherence should be sought with the principles and general objectives of the Union external action and foreign policy related to the country or region in question. They should not be intended to support actions directly development-oriented and they should complement, when appropriate, the financial assistance provided through external aid instruments. Coherence will also be ensured with the Union humanitarian policy, in particular as regards the implementation of emergency assistance. The Commission acting together with the EEAS should set up all institutional mechanisms to ensure such coherence.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 a (new) (35a) The simplification of the funding structures – while providing flexibility – should maintain predictability and reliability and a balanced share should be ensured for each objective of the fund through the national programmes. Therefore, a fair share of financial resources should be allocated under the Asylum and Migration Fund in the 2014- 2020 Multiannual Financial Framework to ensure continuity in supporting the objectives of the Refugee Fund and Integration Fund of the 2007-2013 Financial Framework.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point a – introductory part (a) ‘resettlement’ means the process whereby, on a request from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) based on a person's need for international protection, third-country nationals or stateless persons having the status defined by the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point e (e) ‘family members’ means any persons who are
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point f – point i (i)
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – point f – point iii (iii)
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b – subparagraph 2 The achievement of this objective shall be measured by
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c – subparagraph 2 The achievement of this objective shall be measured by indicators, inter alia, the number of
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d – subparagraph 1 (d) to enhance the solidarity and responsibility sharing between the Member States, in particular towards those most affected by migration and asylum flows, including through practical cooperation, either absolute or proportional financial responsibility sharing and enhanced support to those with less developed hosting and processing systems.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d – subparagraph 1 (d) to enhance the solidarity and responsibility sharing between the Member States, in particular towards those most affected by migration and asylum flows, taking into account the ability of each Member State culturally and economically to receive migrants and asylum seekers.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The objectives referred to in paragraph 2 shall be measured by both qualitative and quantitative cross-cutting criteria, such as child protection provisions, promotion of family life, free access to justice and legal assistance, healthcare, housing, education and ensuring the adequate support and assistance to unaccompanied minors regardless of their residence status.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) any third-country national who is on the territory of a third country, who intend to migrate to the Union and who comply with specific pre-departure
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The target group shall comprise family members of persons referred to above
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) establishment and improvement of administrative structures, systems and training for staff, administrative and judicial authorities, judicial assistance to ensure a free, easy, efficient and smooth regularisation process for all claims of asylum and migration;
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new) (ab) establishment, improvement and maintenance of accommodation infrastructures and services;
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a c (new) (ac) establishment, development and improvement of immediate measures to substitute detention;
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a d (new) (ad) abolishment of all detention centres in the Member States and associated third countries;
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) setting up of administrative structures, systems and training of staff and relevant judicial authorities and free judicial assistance to ensure smooth access to asylum procedures for asylum seekers and efficient and quality asylum procedures.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – point f (f) information and free assistance upon arrival, including interpretation services;
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – point f a (new) (fa) actions to promote family reunification for persons being resettled in a Member State;
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) free advice and assistance in areas such as housing, means of subsistence, employment, administrative and legal guidance, medical, psychological and social care, child care and family reunification;
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – point a (a) establishment and improvement of accommodation infrastructure or services and reception or
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – point a a (new) (aa) establishment, development and improvement of immediate measures to substitute detention;
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – point c (c) provision of material aid, free health and psychological care, including for third country nationals whose removal has been postponed in accordance with Article 9 and Article 14(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC;
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 2. The annual appropriations for the Fund shall be authorised by the budgetary authority with
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 4 4. The
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 – introductory part 5.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 – point a (a)
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 5 – point b (b)
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Without prejudice to the prerogatives of the budgetary authority, EUR 3,232 million shall be allocated to the Member States indicatively as follows:
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The funding allocated for the achievement of the objectives laid down in Article 3(2) shall be apportioned on a fair, balanced and transparent basis. Member States shall ensure that all actions financed by the Fund are compatible with the acquis of the Union in the areas of asylum and immigration, even if they are not bound by associated measures or subject to their application.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 – indent 2 a (new) - persons who have been subjected to acts of violence and/or torture;
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission shall establish strict procedural guarantees and clear criteria for relocation measures, namely transparent, non-discriminatory criteria; information to the potential beneficiaries of relocation; communication in writing of the selection or non-selection of the interviewed applicants and of the criteria which underpinned the decision; reasonable time limits for candidates for relocation, enabling them to take an informed decision and if necessary obtain adequate assistance for their departure; the requirement for their voluntary consent to benefit from relocation measures;
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Relocation measures shall be taken within the framework of an action plan to improve and maintain the quality of reception and asylum systems and integration conditions in the Member State concerned;
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The Commission shall use for its assessment, inter alia, the information collected from Eurostat, the European Migration Network, the EASO and the Frontex Agency risk analysis and relevant international organisations including HCR, civil society and other relevant stakeholders.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point b – introductory part (b) migratory
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point b – point i (i) factor 1 for no particular
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point b – point ii (ii) factor 1,5 for medium particular
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 – point b – point iii (iii) factor 3 for high particular
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The national programmes shall ensure, in each Member State, a fair and equitable distribution of funds in respect of each of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall ensure a fair and equitable distribution of funds in respect of each of the objectives referred in Article 3(2).
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new) If Union actions are implemented indirectly by EU decentralised agencies, the Commission should ensure a fair and equitable allocation between the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex Agency) and the European Asylum Support Office (EASO). The funding allocations shall take into account tasks entrusted to these agencies and their general allocations under the European Union budget.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 1. The Fund shall provide financial assistance to address urgent and specific needs in the event of an emergency situation, as mentioned in Article 2(f).
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 – point 3 a (new) (3a) Programmes and projects in the area of integration in order to improve coordination of relevant policies at several levels between Members States, local and regional authorities, civil society and relevant stakeholders
source: PE-494.560
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| activities/1/committees/0/date | deleted | 2011-12-20 | |
| activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur | deleted |
|
|
| committees/0/date | deleted | 2011-12-20 | |
| committees/0/rapporteur | deleted |
|
|


