2011/0303(NLE)
EU/Central America Association Agreement
| AFET | AFET | DEVE | DEVE | INTA | INTA | |
| Lead Rapporteur | SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio (EPP) | SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio (EPP) | ||||
| Opinion Rapporteur(s) | JOLY Eva (Verts/ALE) | JOLY Eva (Verts/ALE) | ZALBA BIDEGAIN Pablo (EPP) |
Legal basis: TFEU TFEU 217 , TFEU TFEU 218-p6a
Awaiting final decision
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | AFET | SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio (EPP) | |
| Lead | AFET | SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio (EPP) | |
| Opinion | DEVE | JOLY Eva (Verts/ALE) | |
| Opinion | DEVE | JOLY Eva (Verts/ALE) | |
| Opinion | INTA | ZALBA BIDEGAIN Pablo (EPP) | |
| Opinion | INTA |
Legal Basis TFEU TFEU 217, TFEU TFEU 218-p6a
- 6.10.08 Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general
- 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
- 6.20.04 Community Customs Code, tariffs, preferential arrangements, rules of origin
- 6.30 Development cooperation
- 6.30.01 Generalised scheme of tariff preferences, rules of origin
- 6.30.02 Financial and technical cooperation and assistance
- 6.40.10 Relations with Latin America, Central America, Caribbean islands
Activites
-
2012/12/11
Interim resolution adopted by Parliament
-
T7-0478/2012
summary
The European Parliament adopted by 564 votes to 100, with 16 abstentions, a resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America, on the other. Strategic importance of the Association Agreement (AA): Parliament recalls that the Association Agreement (AA) between the EU and Central America (CA) sets a major precedent by being the first bi-regional AA signed by the EU since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon. The Agreement presents a mutual interest and advantages for all the Members States of the Union. It implies a political and economic association between the EU and the region as formed by its different countries and will extend, on a qualitative and quantitative basis, the range of goods and services that will benefit from a free trade area. It will contribute to greater regional integration and stability in Central America (CA) by reinforcing legal security, an increase in trade and investment flows, and by offering an opportunity for diversification and for attracting long-term productive investments. It takes into account the asymmetries and inequalities which exist between the two regions and among the various Central American countries. There is asymmetry in the trade part of the AA, indicated inter alia by the graduation and the establishment of different transitional periods for both regions, enabling productive structures to be adapted to new economic and commercial realities resulting from its implementation. Recalling that the AA, concluded in May 2010, contains three main pillars: political dialogue, cooperation and trade, Parliament addresses a series of recommendations to the Council and the Commission as regards the adoption of the Agreement. Political dialogue: Parliament recalls that this comprehensive partnership between regions is the result of the EUs unbending political will and marks a decisive step forward in the integration of CA, going far beyond mere questions of free trade. Underlining the extraordinary new impetus given by the political dialogue enshrined in the new AA, Members stress the parliamentary dimension of the AA with the establishment of a Parliamentary Association Committee involving the European Parliament. Parliament points out that the AA refers to respect for democratic principles, fundamental human rights and the principle of the rule of law as essential elements of the agreement. It underlines that non-observation of the rules could eventually lead to the suspension of the agreement. In this context, Members call on the Commission to prepare an annual report for the European Parliament, to monitor the AA in its entirety. More generally, Parliament welcomes: the commitment to multilateralism underpinned by the unstinting defence of common values, principles and objectives; interesting possibilities for dialogue on the fight against drug trafficking and organised crime, drug trafficking, money laundering, terrorist financing, as well as organised crime and corruption; proper participation by civil society in both the EU and CA. Cooperation in the fight against poverty and the fostering of social cohesion: Parliament stresses that social cohesion is a priority objective of regional cooperation policy. It highlights the opportunities that this AA offers in terms of improving social cohesion and sustainable development, but also in the field of the environment, management of natural disasters, the fight against climate change, deforestation and combating desertification. It also welcomes the various commitments to coordinate efforts to combat drug trafficking, money laundering, terrorist financing, organised crime and corruption. Parliament expects that the agreement will contribute to the revitalisation and strengthening of economic and trade relations and the integration of the productive fabric of both regions. It calls particularly for the promotion of cooperation in fields as diverse as science and technology, institutional capacity-building, harmonisation of standards, customs procedures and statistics, intellectual property, provision of services, government procurement, industrial development, sustainable resource management, sanitary and phytosanitary standards, support to SMEs, etc. It also demands the organisation of trade fairs, as well as the establishment of regional trade academies both in Latin American regions and across EU Member States, aimed at building capacity among SMEs. Conclusions: overall, Parliament considers that the current trade provisions, which are of a provisional nature and based on a unilateral system of generalised preferences, will gradually give way to a reciprocal, negotiated structure for the gradual liberalisation of trade in goods and services and of public procurement, as well as for action to encourage investment. It stresses that social cohesion is a priority objective of regional cooperation policy, and that the overriding aim is the reduction of poverty, inequality, social exclusion and any form of discrimination. It points out that the AA with CA makes a meaningful contribution to regional, social and political integration efforts and to achieving the ultimate objective of the Bi-regional Strategic Partnership between the EU and Latin America. Lastly, Parliament urges the Association Council to carry out an overall evaluation of the AA five years after its implementation and to conduct, if necessary, a review of the AA on the basis of the findings and the impact noted in the abovementioned evaluation.
-
T7-0479/2012
summary
The European Parliament adopted by 557 votes to 100, with 21 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America, on the other. Parliament consented to the conclusion of the agreement.
- Results of vote in Parliament
-
T7-0478/2012
summary
-
2012/12/10
Debate in Parliament
-
2012/11/08
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
-
A7-0362/2012
summary
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the report by José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA (EPP, ES), recommending that the European Parliament gives its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America, on the other.
-
A7-0360/2012
summary
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an interim report by José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA (EPP, ES) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America, on the other. The report contains a motion for a resolution on the draft Council decision concerning the agreement in question. Strategic importance of the Association Agreement (AA): Members recall that the Association Agreement (AA) between the EU and Central America (CA) sets a major precedent by being the first bi-regional AA signed by the EU since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon. This last presents a mutual interest and advantages for all the Members States of the Union. It implies a political and economic association between the EU and the region as formed by its different countries and will extend, on a qualitative and quantitative basis, the range of goods and services that will benefit from a free trade area. It will contribute to greater regional integration and stability in Central America (CA) by reinforcing legal security, an increase in trade and investment flows, and by offering an opportunity for diversification and for attracting long-term productive investments. At the same time, Members address a series of recommendations to the Council and to the Commission in connection with the adoption of the agreement. Members recall that the AA, concluded in May 2010, is composed of three pillars: political dialogue, cooperation and trade. 1) Political dialogue: Members recall that this comprehensive partnership between regions is the result of the EUs unbending political will and marks a decisive step forward in the integration of CA, going far beyond mere questions of free trade. Underlining the extraordinary new impetus given by the political dialogue enshrined in the new AA, Members stress the parliamentary dimension of the AA with the establishment of a Parliamentary Association Committee involving the European Parliament. Members point out that the AA refers to respect for democratic principles, fundamental human rights and the principle of the rule of law as essential elements of the agreement. They underline that non-observation of the rules could eventually lead to the suspension of the agreement. In this context, Members call on the Commission carry out an annual report for the European Parliament, to monitor the AA in its entirety. More generally, Members welcome: · the commitment to multilateralism underpinned by the unstinting defence of common values, principles and objectives; · interesting possibilities for dialogue on the fight against drug trafficking and organised crime, drug trafficking, money laundering, terrorist financing, as well as organised crime and corruption; · proper participation by civil society in both the EU and CA. 2) Cooperation in the fight against poverty and the fostering of social cohesion: Members stress that social cohesion is a priority objective of regional cooperation policy. They highlight the opportunities that this AA offers in terms of improving social cohesion and sustainable development, but also in the field of the environment, management of natural disasters, the fight against climate change, deforestation and combating desertification. They expect that the agreement will contribute to the revitalisation and strengthening of economic and trade relations and the integration of the productive fabric of both regions. They call particularly for the promotion of cooperation in fields as diverse as science and technology, institutional capacity-building, harmonisation of standards, customs procedures and statistics, intellectual property, provision of services, government procurement, industrial development, sustainable resource management, sanitary and phytosanitary standards, support to SMEs, etc. They also demand the organisation of trade fairs as well as the establishment of regional trade academies both in Latin American regions and across EU Member States. Conclusions: in general, Members consider that the current trade provisions, which are of a provisional nature and based on a unilateral system of generalised preferences, will gradually give way to a reciprocal, negotiated structure for the gradual liberalisation of trade in goods and services and of public procurement, as well as for action to encourage investment. They point out that the AA with CA makes a meaningful contribution to regional, social and political integration efforts and to achieving the ultimate objective of the Bi-regional Strategic Partnership between the EU and Latin America. Lastly, they urge the Association Council to carry out an overall evaluation of the AA five years after its implementation and to conduct, if necessary, a review of the AA on the basis of the findings and the impact noted in the abovementioned evaluation.
- AFET AFET/7/07836;AFET/7/09662 SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio EPP
- AFET AFET/7/07836;AFET/7/09662 SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio EPP
- DEVE JOLY Eva Verts/ALE
- DEVE JOLY Eva Verts/ALE
- INTA ZALBA BIDEGAIN Pablo EPP
- INTA
-
A7-0362/2012
summary
- 2012/10/25 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- 2012/09/12 Amendments tabled in committee
- 2012/09/11 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
- 2012/07/12 Amendments tabled in committee
-
2012/07/06
Legislative proposal
-
16395/1/2011
summary
PURPOSE: to conclude an Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision BACKGROUND: at the European Union - Latin America and Caribbean Summit held in Vienna on 12 - 13 May 2006, the Heads of State and Government of the European Union and of certain Central American Republics decided to open negotiations on an Association Agreement between the two regions, including the establishment of a Free Trade Agreement. Negotiations were formally launched in October 2007 and were successfully concluded in May 2010. The text of the agreement was initialled on 22 March 2011. In accordance with a Council Decision, the Agreement was signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion, and Part IV thereof applied on a provisional basis. The proposal aims to conclude the Agreement on behalf of the European Union. It should be noted that the Agreement does not affect the rights of investors of the Member States to benefit from any more favourable treatment provided for in any agreement related to investment to which a Member State and a signatory Central American Republic are Parties. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was undertaken. LEGAL BASIS: Article 217 in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) TFEU. CONTENT: this proposal aims to conclude the Agreement between the EU and its Member States, of the one part, and Central America, of the other, is hereby approved on behalf of the European Union. Overall the Agreement will lock-in and promote above and beyond WTO rules policies of openness and respect at the domestic level for internationally agreed rules and best practices while securing a transparent, non-discriminatory and predictable environment for EU operators and investors in the region. Its main provisions are as follows: Political Dialogue: the Agreement includes all the political clauses as an essential element which reflects EU values. The main objective of the Political Dialogue is: · to develop a privileged political partnership based on values, principles and common objectives; · to reinforce human rights; · conflict prevention; · good governance; · regional integration; · poverty reduction; · the fight against inequality; · sustainable development. Strengthening cooperation: cooperation should be manifested in concrete actions in every aspect of common interest, including economic development, social cohesion, natural resources, culture, justice and the sciences. Trade: the trade part of the Agreement between the EU and Central America establishes the conditions for EU economic operators to take full advantage of the opportunities and the emerging complementarities between their respective economies. Over the course of its implementation, the Agreement will fully relieve EU exporters of industrial and fisheries products to Central America from paying customs duties. It satisfies Article XXIV of the GATT criteria to eliminate duties and other restrictive regulations of commerce with respect to substantially all trade between the parties. In addition, it will reduce the scope for Central America to adopt non-tariff barriers in important areas, for example in the field of labelling requirements for textiles. Central America will benefit from substantial new access to the EU market in particular for their key agriculture exports: bananas, sugar, beef and rum while the EU will grant 100% duty-free coverage for industrial products and fisheries of Central America origin at entry into force of the Agreement. On services and establishment, commitments obtained from Central American Republics go beyond their commitments under the GATS (General Agreement on Trade in Services) and match key EU interests in relevant sectors (notably in telecom services, environmental services and maritime services as well as in other transport services) while respecting EU sensitivities, e.g. in terms of temporary presence of natural persons for business purposes. With regard to certain sectors, the commitments offered by Central American Republics reach effective parity with other agreements concluded by Central America such as the CAFTA or even go beyond in areas such as market access in non-services sectors or maritime transport services. In procurement, the deals concluded with Central America provide important access both on the level of central government and below (including for example procurement related to the Panama Canal). The Agreement also establishes a set of disciplines which go beyond those agreed in the multilateral framework notably on: intellectual property (e.g. 224 EU geographical indications protected, data protection conditions clarified); sustainable development (the Agreement is GSP+ equivalent or above on labour and environmental issues and contains specific commitments on sustainable fisheries); competition (disciplines on monopolies transparency obligations on subsidies); technical barriers to trade (market surveillance, transparency in regulation procedures and disciplines on labelling and marking); sanitary and phytosanitary measures (WTO+ measures on animal welfare, regionalisation, approval of export establishments, on-the-spot inspections, import check) among others. The Agreement shall not be construed as conferring rights or imposing obligations which can be directly invoked before Union or Member State courts and tribunals. Institutional framework: the Agreement establishes an effective institutional framework for its implementation including both an Association Council as well as an Association Committee supported by a set of sub-committees to allow for work and consultations on the various areas covered in the trade part of the Agreement and a bilateral dispute settlement mechanism. Provisions are made to authorise the Commission to approve modifications to the list of geographical indications recommended by the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property to the Association Committee for approval by the Association Council. Provisional application: Member States of the EU will also be Party to this Agreement because of certain commitments in the Protocol on Cultural Co-operation. Accordingly, the Agreement needs to be ratified by them according to their internal procedures. This could take a considerable period of time. Parliament to express its views on the Agreement. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the EU budget.
- 16396/2011
-
16395/1/2011
summary
-
2012/07/06
Legislative proposal published
-
16395/1/2011
summary
PURPOSE: to conclude an Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision BACKGROUND: at the European Union - Latin America and Caribbean Summit held in Vienna on 12 - 13 May 2006, the Heads of State and Government of the European Union and of certain Central American Republics decided to open negotiations on an Association Agreement between the two regions, including the establishment of a Free Trade Agreement. Negotiations were formally launched in October 2007 and were successfully concluded in May 2010. The text of the agreement was initialled on 22 March 2011. In accordance with a Council Decision, the Agreement was signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion, and Part IV thereof applied on a provisional basis. The proposal aims to conclude the Agreement on behalf of the European Union. It should be noted that the Agreement does not affect the rights of investors of the Member States to benefit from any more favourable treatment provided for in any agreement related to investment to which a Member State and a signatory Central American Republic are Parties. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was undertaken. LEGAL BASIS: Article 217 in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) TFEU. CONTENT: this proposal aims to conclude the Agreement between the EU and its Member States, of the one part, and Central America, of the other, is hereby approved on behalf of the European Union. Overall the Agreement will lock-in and promote above and beyond WTO rules policies of openness and respect at the domestic level for internationally agreed rules and best practices while securing a transparent, non-discriminatory and predictable environment for EU operators and investors in the region. Its main provisions are as follows: Political Dialogue: the Agreement includes all the political clauses as an essential element which reflects EU values. The main objective of the Political Dialogue is: · to develop a privileged political partnership based on values, principles and common objectives; · to reinforce human rights; · conflict prevention; · good governance; · regional integration; · poverty reduction; · the fight against inequality; · sustainable development. Strengthening cooperation: cooperation should be manifested in concrete actions in every aspect of common interest, including economic development, social cohesion, natural resources, culture, justice and the sciences. Trade: the trade part of the Agreement between the EU and Central America establishes the conditions for EU economic operators to take full advantage of the opportunities and the emerging complementarities between their respective economies. Over the course of its implementation, the Agreement will fully relieve EU exporters of industrial and fisheries products to Central America from paying customs duties. It satisfies Article XXIV of the GATT criteria to eliminate duties and other restrictive regulations of commerce with respect to substantially all trade between the parties. In addition, it will reduce the scope for Central America to adopt non-tariff barriers in important areas, for example in the field of labelling requirements for textiles. Central America will benefit from substantial new access to the EU market in particular for their key agriculture exports: bananas, sugar, beef and rum while the EU will grant 100% duty-free coverage for industrial products and fisheries of Central America origin at entry into force of the Agreement. On services and establishment, commitments obtained from Central American Republics go beyond their commitments under the GATS (General Agreement on Trade in Services) and match key EU interests in relevant sectors (notably in telecom services, environmental services and maritime services as well as in other transport services) while respecting EU sensitivities, e.g. in terms of temporary presence of natural persons for business purposes. With regard to certain sectors, the commitments offered by Central American Republics reach effective parity with other agreements concluded by Central America such as the CAFTA or even go beyond in areas such as market access in non-services sectors or maritime transport services. In procurement, the deals concluded with Central America provide important access both on the level of central government and below (including for example procurement related to the Panama Canal). The Agreement also establishes a set of disciplines which go beyond those agreed in the multilateral framework notably on: intellectual property (e.g. 224 EU geographical indications protected, data protection conditions clarified); sustainable development (the Agreement is GSP+ equivalent or above on labour and environmental issues and contains specific commitments on sustainable fisheries); competition (disciplines on monopolies transparency obligations on subsidies); technical barriers to trade (market surveillance, transparency in regulation procedures and disciplines on labelling and marking); sanitary and phytosanitary measures (WTO+ measures on animal welfare, regionalisation, approval of export establishments, on-the-spot inspections, import check) among others. The Agreement shall not be construed as conferring rights or imposing obligations which can be directly invoked before Union or Member State courts and tribunals. Institutional framework: the Agreement establishes an effective institutional framework for its implementation including both an Association Council as well as an Association Committee supported by a set of sub-committees to allow for work and consultations on the various areas covered in the trade part of the Agreement and a bilateral dispute settlement mechanism. Provisions are made to authorise the Commission to approve modifications to the list of geographical indications recommended by the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property to the Association Committee for approval by the Association Council. Provisional application: Member States of the EU will also be Party to this Agreement because of certain commitments in the Protocol on Cultural Co-operation. Accordingly, the Agreement needs to be ratified by them according to their internal procedures. This could take a considerable period of time. Parliament to express its views on the Agreement. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the EU budget.
- DG {u'url': u'http://ec.europa.eu/trade/', u'title': u'Trade'}, ASHTON Catherine
-
16395/1/2011
summary
- 2012/06/05 Committee draft report
-
2011/10/25
Initial legislative proposal
-
COM(2011)0679
summary
PURPOSE: to conclude an Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision BACKGROUND: at the European Union - Latin America and Caribbean Summit held in Vienna on 12 - 13 May 2006, the Heads of State and Government of the European Union and of certain Central American Republics decided to open negotiations on an Association Agreement between the two regions, including the establishment of a Free Trade Agreement. Negotiations were formally launched in October 2007 and were successfully concluded in May 2010. The text of the agreement was initialled on 22 March 2011. The proposal aims to conclude the Agreement on behalf of the European Union. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was undertaken. LEGAL BASIS: Article217 in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) TFEU. CONTENT: the Commission proposal aims to conclude the Agreement between the EU and its Member States, of the one part, and Central America, of the other, is hereby approved on behalf of the European Overall the Agreement will lock-in and promote - above and beyond WTO rules - policies of openness and respect at the domestic level for internationally agreed rules and best practices while securing a transparent, non-discriminatory and predictable environment for EU operators and investors in the region. Its main provisions are as follows: Political Dialogue: the Agreement includes all the political clauses as an essential element which reflects EU values. The main objective of the Political Dialogue is: to develop a privileged political partnership based on values, principles and common objectives; to reinforce human rights; conflict prevention; good governance; regional integration; poverty reduction; the fight against inequality; sustainable development. Strengthening cooperation: cooperation should be manifested in concrete actions in every aspect of common interest, including economic development, social cohesion, natural resources, culture, justice and the sciences. Trade: the trade part of the Agreement between the EU and Central America establishes the conditions for EU economic operators to take full advantage of the opportunities and the emerging complementarities between their respective economies. Over the course of its implementation, the Agreement will fully relieve EU exporters of industrial and fisheries products to Central America from paying customs duties. It satisfies Article XXIV of the GATT criteria to eliminate duties and other restrictive regulations of commerce with respect to substantially all trade between the parties. In addition, it will reduce the scope for Central America to adopt non-tariff barriers in important areas, for example in the field of labelling requirements for textiles. Central America will benefit from substantial new access to the EU market in particular for their key agriculture exports: bananas, sugar, beef and rum while the EU will grant 100% duty-free coverage for industrial products and fisheries of Central America origin at entry into force of the Agreement. On services and establishment, commitments obtained from Central American Republics go beyond their commitments under the GATS (General Agreement on Trade in Services) and match key EU interests in relevant sectors (notably in telecom services, environmental services and maritime services as well as in other transport services) while respecting EU sensitivities, e.g. in terms of temporary presence of natural persons for business purposes. With regard to certain sectors, the commitments offered by Central American Republics reach effective parity with other agreements concluded by Central America such as the CAFTA or even go beyond in areas such as market access in non-services sectors or maritime transport services. In procurement, the deals concluded with Central America provide important access both on the level of central government and below (including for example procurement related to the Panama Canal). The Agreement also establishes a set of disciplines which go beyond those agreed in the multilateral framework notably on: intellectual property (e.g. 224 EU geographical indications protected, data protection conditions clarified); sustainable development (the Agreement is GSP+ equivalent or above on labour and environmental issues and contains specific commitments on sustainable fisheries); competition (disciplines on monopolies - transparency obligations on subsidies); technical barriers to trade (market surveillance, transparency in regulation procedures and disciplines on labelling and marking); sanitary and phytosanitary measures (WTO+ measures on animal welfare, regionalisation, approval of export establishments, on-the-spot inspections, import check) among others. Institutional framework: the Agreement establishes an effective institutional framework for its implementation including both an Association Council as well as an Association Committee supported by a set of sub-committees to allow for work and consultations on the various areas covered in the trade part of the Agreement and a bilateral dispute settlement mechanism. Provisional application: Member States of the EU will also be Party to this Agreement because of certain commitments in the Protocol on Cultural Co-operation. Accordingly, the Agreement needs to be ratified by them according to their internal procedures. This could take a considerable period of time. In order to ensure prompt application of the trade part of the Agreement pending full ratification by the Member States, the Commission therefore proposes to provisionally apply the trade part. In light of the significance of the Agreement, the Commission considers that the Council should send the notifications referred to in Articles 353(2), 353(3) and 353(4) only after a certain lapse of time so as to allow the European Parliament to express its views on the Agreement. The Commission is ready to work with the Council and the European Parliament so that the trade part of the Agreement can be provisionally applied in 2012. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the EU budget.
- DG {u'url': u'http://ec.europa.eu/trade/', u'title': u'Trade'}, ASHTON Catherine
-
COM(2011)0679
summary
Documents
- Initial legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0679
- Committee draft report: PE489.643
- Committee draft report: PE489.715
- Legislative proposal: 16395/1/2011
- Document attached to the procedure: 16396/2011
- Legislative proposal published: 16395/1/2011
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE492.933
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE492.929
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0362/2012
- Committee interim report tabled for plenary: A7-0360/2012
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0478/2012
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0479/2012
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
Votes
A7-0362/2012 - José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra - approbation
| Position | Total | ALDE | ECR | EFD | GUE/NGL | NI | PPE | S&D | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 557 | 77 | 44 | 21 | 0 | 8 | 239 | 167 | 1 | 1 |
| Against | 100 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 30 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 51 | 0 |
| Abstain | 21 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
A7-0362/2012 - José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra - approval
| Position | Total | ALDE | ECR | EFD | GUE/NGL | NI | PPE | S&D | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 557 | 77 | 44 | 21 | 0 | 8 | 239 | 167 | 1 | 1 |
| Against | 100 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 30 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 51 | 0 |
| Abstain | 21 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 124 |
2011/0303(NLE) EU/Central America Association Agreement
2012/02/08
INTA
46 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (EUROLAT) resolution of 19 May 2011 on the prospects for trade relations between the European Union and Latin America,
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Citation 3 b (new) – having regard to the proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the negotiating mandate for an association agreement between the European Union and its Member States, and the countries of Central America,
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Citation 3 c (new) – having regard to the trade chapter of the EU-Central America Association Agreement,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Citation 3 d (new) – having regard to the final report on the EU-Central America Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment (TRADE08/C1/C14 & C15 – Lot 2)1, _____________ 1‘ Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Association Agreement to be negotiated between the EU and Central America’.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the Madrid Summit held in May 2010 led to the resumption of all the trade negotiations with Latin America that had been on ice for the last few years, concluding the negotiations on this PA, which, after a legal review, was initialled on 22 March 2011 and signed in Tegucigalpa on 28 June 2012,
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the PA meets the EU’s objective of promoting regional integration through trade, as laid down in Commission Communication ‘Trade, Growth and World Affairs’ and in line with the Europe 2020 strategy, uses trade as an engine for competitiveness
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the PA must meet
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the PA was supposed to meet
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the Council is proposing that the trade-related part should be applied provisionally before the political and cooperation pillars enter into force,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the trade provisions of the PA should not be applied prior to the entry into force of the political and cooperation chapters,
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. stressing the magnitude of the trade part of the PA that
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. stressing the magnitude of the
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. anticipating that the trade part of the PA will facilitate, on a sector-by-sector basis, immediate or gradual
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. anticipating that the trade part of the PA will facilitate, on a sector-by-sector basis, immediate or gradual open access tariff payment, with the objective of creating a bi-regional free trade area
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) Db. whereas instead of building on the benefits of GSP+, the EU pushed for the large-scale opening-up of the services market in Central America, going against the European Parliament’s recommendation to ‘take into account the importance of guaranteeing universal access to essential services and of national rights to regulate, and thus of proceeding cautiously in the negotiations on the liberalisation of trade in services’,
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Recital E E. whereas one of the PA’s main objectives of contributing to greater regional integration and stability in CA will be achieved provided that the states party to it show a clear political will and make a commitment to overcoming difficulties and achieving further dynamic integration (including Panama), by adopting effective, equivalent and appropriate measures in order to
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Recital E E. whereas one of the PA’s main objectives to contribute to greater regional integration and stability in CA will be achieved provided that the states party to it show a clear political will and make a commitment to overcoming difficulties and achieving further dynamic integration (including Panama), by adopting effective, equivalent and appropriate measures in order to bring together synergies, and
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Recital F F. reiterating the positive effects for both parties of establishing a framework for strengthening legal security and encouraging an increase in trade and investment flows and sectorial and geographical diversification; anticipating that the most significant effect for the EU will be the savings resulting from the staggered reduction or elimination of tariffs and trade facilitation, and investment in a framework of stability and mutual trust, stressing the commitment of both regions to international standards, especially those of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and International Labour Organisation (ILO); noting that for CA it will imply a greater international presence, a strategic partnership with an established market, and an opportunity for diversification and for attracting long-term productive investments,
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Recital F F.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Recital F F.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Recital G G. recognising the asymmetry of the PA,
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Recital G G. recognising that the asymmetry of the PA
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Recital H H. highlighting among its principles respect for democratic principles and fundamental human rights, and the rule of law
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Recital I I. emphasising that the commitment of both regions in respect of geographical indications and intellectual property in accordance with international standards is most unilaterally beneficial for European industry and trade,
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Recital I I. emphasising that the commitment of both regions in respect of geographical indications and intellectual property in accordance with international standards will in the years to come unilaterally benefit European producers and exporters; observing the lack of infrastructure, administrative support and access to finance or credit for citizens of CA states, which would enable them to become registered right holders for the purposes of this agreement, in particular with regard to traditional medical knowledge,
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Recital J J. recalling that all states in CA benefit from the Generalised System of Preferences Plus scheme (GSP+), which will cease to apply on 31 December 2013; noting that the new GSP scheme will
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Recital J J. recalling that all states in CA benefit from the Generalised System of Preferences Plus scheme (GSP+), which will cease to apply on 31 December 2013; noting that the new GSP scheme will no
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Recital J J. recalling that all states in CA benefit from the Generalised System of Preferences Plus scheme (GSP+), which will cease to apply on 31 December 2013; noting that the new GSP scheme will not apply to those countries with upper-middle income, thereby Costa Rica and Panama would lose their right to benefit from this system;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Recital J J. recalling that currently all states in CA benefit from the Generalised System of Preferences Plus scheme (GSP+)
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas the negotiation guidelines for the PA were drawn up before the financial crisis, and the chapters on financial services and establishment in particular run counter to the efforts the EU has been making since 2008 to regulate and control the banking and finance sector and ‘shadow banking’ as major factors in the crisis, and whereas there is a risk that the reciprocity inherent in the PA will result in toxic products being reintroduced into the European banking and finance sector, and an increase in speculative behaviour and tax evasion by investors and businesses,
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas the chapters on financial services and establishment run counter to the Union's efforts to tackle the root causes of the financial and economic crisis by regulating and controlling the banking and financial sectors and by abolishing shadow banking structures; is concerned that the PA creates new loopholes enabling toxic assets to re-enter the European banking and financial system, offers additional incentives for speculation and provides opportunities for tax evasion; warns that these provisions make CA an attractive target for drug money and that the new money- laundering opportunities could lead to collaboration between European and Latin American organised crime,
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Recital J b (new) Jb. whereas the 2003 Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Central America only entered into force in June 2012, and whereas the corresponding parts of the Association Agreement are just as likely to be subject to severe delays in implementation, while the trade-related part will come into effect in line with its provisional implementation following a vote in favour by the EP,
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point i i)
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point ii ii)
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point iii iii) Ensure compliance with the conditions defined in the PA, seeking greater synerg
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point iii iii)
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point iii iii)
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point iv iv)
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point iv iv) Promote regional integration and cooperation in CA with appropriate technical and financial resources in strategic sectors
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point v v)
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point v v) Invite the private sector and civil society to engage by means of a corporate social responsibility (CSR) policy that enables them to have a smooth relationship and brings about
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point v v) Invite the private sector and civil society to become involved through a corporate social responsibility (CSR) policy that enables them to have a smooth relationship and brings about greater sustainable economic development for social cohesion and economic growth; call on the Commission to come forward with a legislative proposal on how to monitor compliance by Union-based investors with their environmental, social and labour law standards obligations, including the imposition of penalties and the award of compensation in the event of violations;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point v a (new) va) Promote action to raise awareness of the Agreement among stakeholders in both regions and encourage the organisation of trade fairs in both regions in order to provide opportunities for contacts to be forged and cooperation agreements to be concluded, particularly among SMEs;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point v a (new) va) Call on the European Union and the countries of Central America to keep a close eye on the activities of extractive industries in the region, in particular as regards their impact on the environment and the job situation for local people;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point v a (new) va) Support the establishment of competitive value-added production facilities in Central America; propose the establishment of regional trade academies both in Latin American regions and across EU Member States, aimed at building capacity among SMEs by providing training sessions on the preconditions for trading agricultural products, goods and services with the partner region;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – point vi source: PE-494.571
2012/04/09
DEVE
9 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose that Parliament
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 2 #
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose that Parliament
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Welcomes the fact that this Association Agreement aims to encourage a higher level of integration between the two regions, as well as Central American regional integration; highlights the opportunities that this Agreement offers in terms of improving social cohesion and sustainable development, which are key elements in consolidating economic growth, social stability and democratic engagement;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that benefits that CA may receive in terms of trade preferences are
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) (6a) Welcomes the fact that the agreement takes account of asymmetry between the two blocs; stresses that Central America is perhaps the region in which the EU has had and continues to have the highest per capita commitment to solidarity and development cooperation in the world;
source: PE-494.708
2012/09/21
INTA
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose that Parliament decline to give its consent.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose that Parliament decline to give its consent.
source: PE-496.454
2012/12/09
AFET
67 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to its recommendation of 15 March 2007¹ to the Council on the negotiating mandate for an Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the countries of Central America, of the other part, _________________ ¹ OJ_C301E, p. 153, 13.12.2007.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to its recommendation of 15 March 2007¹ to the Council on the negotiating mandate for an Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the countries of Central America, of the other part, _______________ ¹ OJ_C301E, p. 153, 13.12.2007.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to its recommendation of 15 March 2007¹ to the Council on the negotiating mandate for an Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the countries of Central America, of the other part, ______________ ¹ OJ_C301E, p. 153, 13.12.2007.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision Citation 4 b (new) having regard to its resolutions of 5 May 2010 on the EU strategy for relations with Latin America¹ and of 21 October 2010 on the EU’s trade relations with Latin- America², __________________ ¹ P7_TA(2010)0141 ² P7_TA(2010)0387
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision Citation 5 a (new) - having regard to the report on the trade chapter of the EU-Central America Association Agreement of March 2012¹, ________________ ¹ (PE 433.864)
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision Citation 5 b (new) - having regard to the final report on the EU-Central America Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment (TRADE08/C1/C14 & C15 – Lot 2)¹, ________________ ¹ "Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment of the Association Agreement to be negotiated between the EU and Central America".
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision Recital A A. whereas one of the key objectives of the Biregional Strategic Partnership between the EU and Latin America is regional and social integration underpinned by the conclusion of subregional and bilateral association agreements,
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas for the development of EU- Latin America partnership relations to be of mutual benefit and bring advantages to both parties it is essential that respect for democracy, the state of law and full human rights for all members of society be seen as key elements of political dialogue; that the fight against poverty and inequality be seen as a key element of biregional cooperation relations; and for trade exchanges to include fair conditions of mutual benefit based on the principles of complementarity and solidarity, founded on an awareness of the asymmetries in development existing between the two regions,
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a decision Recital B B. whereas for the development of
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a decision Recital B B. whereas the development of relations with Latin America and, in particular, with Central America is of mutual benefit and brings advantages to all EU Member States,
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the aim of the Association Agreement between the EU and Central America should be to promote sustainable development, the consolidation of democracy and the state of law, full respect for human rights, social cohesion and regional integration,
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a decision Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas the Agreement includes a legally binding human rights clause which requires the signatory parties to ensure proper monitoring of human rights,
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a decision Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas there is a high incidence of assassinations of trade unionists in Central America; whereas there is a very high rate of feminicide;
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a decision Recital B d (new) Bd. whereas the Agreement includes a trade and sustainable development chapter which should help to maintain a high level of socio-environmental and labour protection,
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C C. whereas the EU is
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas respect for democracy, the state of law and the human, civil and political rights of the people of both regions are fundamental elements of the Agreement,
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the aim of the Association Agreement between the EU and Central America should be to promote sustainable development, the consolidation of democracy and the state of law, full respect for human rights, social cohesion and regional integration,
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the Central American region is characterised by conditions of severe poverty, social exclusion and socio- environmental vulnerability,
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas the Association Agreement implies a political and economic association between the EU and the region as formed by its different countries, taking into account the asymmetries and inequalities which exist between the two regions and among the various Central American countries,
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas the Agreement includes a human rights clause which requires the signatory parties to properly monitor human rights and that its practical enforceability must be guaranteed,
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas with the entry into force of the Association Agreement the Central American countries will leave the Generalised System of Preferences Plus (GSP+) special scheme under which they receive preferential trade conditions in exchange for guaranteeing the effective application of 27 international treaties, including the four fundamental treaties of the International Labour Organisation,
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C c (new) Cc. whereas the aim of the Agreement should be to promote sustainable development, social cohesion and regional integration,
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C c (new) Cc. whereas the Agreement includes a trade and sustainable development chapter which should help to maintain a high level of socio-environmental and labour protection,
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C d (new) Cd. whereas the social and environmental impact report predicted that production would be focused on primary sectors such as fruit, vegetables and dried fruits; that there would be more pressure on land and water resources and that social conflict would increase,
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C d (new) Cd. whereas the social and environmental impact report predicted that production would be focused on primary sectors such as fruit, vegetables and dried fruits, with more pressure on land and water resources and that social conflict would increase
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C e (new) Ce. whereas the Council proposes a provisional implementation of the trade component before the entry into force of the trade and cooperation pillars,
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision Recital C f (new) Cf. whereas the Agreement provides for the creation of a Parliamentary Committee of the Association; whereas the European Parliament has recommended the provision of an annual report by said committee,
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point c (c) Points out that negotiations were successfully concluded in May 2010 and that, after a phase of legal review, the text of the agreement was initialled on 22 March 2011 and signed in Tegucigalpa on 28 June 2012;
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point c a (new) (c a) Recalls that the process of Central American integration has been subjected to severe pressure as a result of political crises in and among its countries, as well as the lack of interest shown by some members in supporting the institutions of the Central American integration system;
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point d (d)
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point d a (new) (da) Recalls that the Central American integration process has been subjected to severe pressure as a result of political crises in and among the region’s countries, as well as the lack of interest shown by some members in supporting the institutions of the Central American integration system;
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point d b (new) (db) Regrets that this Agreement, as the first comprehensive partnership between regions, gives precedence to the trade component over other aspects, thereby demonstrating the EU’s interest in prioritising its commercial strategy. This has reduced the Agreement to a free trade agreement along closely similar lines to that signed between the Central American countries and the United States, CAFTA;
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point e (e)
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point e (e)
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point f (f) Welcomes the
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point f (f) Welcomes the
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point g (g) Stresses the parliamentary dimension of the Association Agreement, with the establishment of a Parliamentary Association Committee, made up of MEPs and Central American parliamentarians, which is to be kept informed of decisions taken by the Association Council and may make recommendations and gather information on how the agreement is being implemented; calls for an annual report to be submitted by the Association Council to the Association Parliamentary Committee, on the state of compliance with labour, socio-environmental and human rights standards within the framework of implementation of the Agreement and for its recommendations to be taken into consideration;
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point g Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point h (h) Stresses that the Association Agreement reached with Central America
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point h (h) Stresses that the Association Agreement reached with Central America
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point i (i) Points out that Article 1 of the agreement refers to respect for democratic principles, fundamental human rights and the principle of the rule of law as ‘essential elements’ of the agreement, so that failure to observe them by any of the parties would result in the adoption of measures which could eventually lead to the suspension of the agreement; considers, nonetheless, that specific mechanisms should be created to guarantee respect for and compliance with the human rights clause of the Agreement;
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point i (i) Points out that Article 1 of the agreement refers to respect for democratic principles, fundamental human rights and the principle of the rule of law as ‘essential elements’ of the agreement, so that failure to observe them by any of the parties would result in the adoption of measures which could eventually lead to the suspension of the agreement; regrets, however, that no specific mechanism has been included to guarantee its effectiveness, as the European Parliament had recommended;
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point i a (new) (ia) Proposes that the Commission carry out an annual report for the European Parliament, to monitor the Agreement and compliance and respect for democratic principles and human rights;
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point j (j)
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point j (j)
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point j (j) Stresses that the Association Agreement with Central America should be seen as an ideal framework for joining forces, as equal partners, to combat social inequality and poverty, to foster inclusive development and to address the remaining social, economic and political challenges;
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point q (q) Highlights the fact that the Association Agreement
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point l (l) Notes that the new Association Agreement opens up new possibilities for dialogue on the fight against drug trafficking and organised crime, in line with the Regional Security Strategy endorsed by the Central American presidents;
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point m (m)
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point n (n) Stresses that social cohesion is a priority objective of regional cooperation policy; insists that social cohesion can only be achieved by reducing poverty, inequality, social exclusion and all forms of discrimination through proper education, including vocational training; stresses that social inequality has not been sufficiently reduced in recent years and that public safety is a matter of great concern in Central America;
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point n (n) Stresses that social cohesion is a priority objective of regional cooperation policy; insists that social cohesion can only be achieved by reducing poverty, inequality, social exclusion and all forms of discrimination; stresses that social inequality has not been sufficiently reduced in recent years
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point n a (new) (na) Alerts the EU to the danger of using the Agreement to focus cooperation on the implementation of the trade component, supporting the major Central American exporters instead of strengthening the development of SMEs and interregional trade, which is crucial to building integration and to the development of the region and is a fundamental axis for development and integration;
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point o (o) Points out that commitments have been made to cooperate in modernising the state and public authorities, improving systems for tax collection and transparency, combating corruption and impunity, strengthening the legal system and encouraging the involvement of civil society in public life;
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point o (o) Points out that commitments have been made to cooperate in modernising the state and public authorities, improving systems for tax collection and transparency, combating corruption and impunity, strengthening the legal system and encouraging the involvement of civil society in public life;
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point r (r)
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point r (r)
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point r a (new) (ra) Regrets that the requirement to comply with labour and socio- environmental standards established by the Agreement is below that set by the currently applicable GSP+ system, due to the fact that the trade and sustainable development chapter neither includes nor is linked to the dispute settlement mechanism; furthermore regrets that the Agreement prioritises the trade pillar, thereby neglecting the social cohesion objective and jeopardising the achievements made so far;
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point r a (new) (ra) Regrets that the requirement to comply with labour and socio- environmental standards established by the Agreement is below that set by the currently applicable GSP+ system, due to the fact that the trade and sustainable development chapter neither includes nor is linked to the dispute settlement mechanism;
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point t (t) Points out that the Association Agreement with Central America should make
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point t (t) Points out that the Association Agreement with Central America makes a meaningful contribution to regional, social and political integration efforts and to achieving the ultimate objective of the Biregional Strategic Partnership between the EU and Latin America
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point t a (new) (ta) Expresses its concern at the foreseeable socio-environmental impact of the Agreement and the consequences of this for a region already worryingly prone to natural disasters, even before taking the climate change variable into consideration; urges the Association Parliamentary Committee to closely monitor the situation as it develops, request information from the Association Council and deliver an annual report;
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point t a (new) (ta) Expresses its concern at the foreseeable socio-environmental impact of the Agreement and the consequences of this for a region already worryingly prone to natural disasters, even before taking the climate change variable into consideration; urges the Association Parliamentary Committee to closely monitor the situation as it develops, request information from the Association Council and deliver an annual report;
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point t b (new) (tb) Points out that the Agreement consolidates a primary export model for the Central American countries, which will increase pressure on land and water resources and concentrate production in a few sectors, such as fruit, vegetables and dried fruits, as has been recognised by the socio-environmental impact assessment carried out by the European Commission;
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point t c (new) (tb) Urges the Association Council to carry out an impact assessment five years after the implementation of the Agreement; considers that the Agreement should be reviewed on the basis of the findings and the impact observed;
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point t c (new) (tb) Urges the Association Council to carry out an impact assessment five years after the implementation of the Agreement; considers that the Agreement should be reviewed on the basis of the findings and the impact observed;
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point t c (new) (tb) Urges the Association Council to carry out an impact assessment five years after the implementation of the Agreement; considers that the Agreement should be reviewed on the basis of the findings and the impact noted during that time;
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a decision Paragraph 1 - point t d (new) source: PE-492.929
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| activities/0/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EC |
|
| activities/0/commission | added |
|
|
| activities/0/docs/0/text/0 | changed |
Old
OBJECTIF : conclure un accord établissant une association entre l'Union européenne et ses États membres, d'une part, et l'Amérique centrale, d'autre part. ACTE PROPOSÉ : Décision du Conseil. CONTEXTE : lors du sommet Union européenne - Amérique latine et Caraïbes, qui s'est tenu à Vienne les 12 et 13 mai 2006, les chefs d'État ou de gouvernement de l'Union européenne et de certaines républiques d'Amérique centrale ont décidé de lancer des négociations en vue de la conclusion d'un accord d'association entre les deux régions, avec l'établissement d'un accord de libre échange. Les négociations ont été officiellement ouvertes en octobre 2007 et ont été conclues avec succès en mai 2010. Le texte de l'accord a été paraphé le 22 mars 2011. Il convient maintenant de conclure l'accord au nom de l'Union européenne. ANALYSE D'IMPACT : aucune analyse d'impact n'a été réalisée. BASE JURIDIQUE : article 217, en liaison avec article 218, par. 6, point a) du traité sur le fonctionnement de l'Union européenne (TFUE). CONTENU : avec la présente proposition de décision, la Commission propose de conclure, au nom de l'Union européenne, l'accord entre l'UE et ses États membres, d'une part, et l'Amérique centrale, d'autre part. D'une manière générale, l'accord pérennisera et encouragera -au-delà des dispositions découlant du cadre de l'OMC- les politiques d'ouverture et de respect des règles internationales et des meilleures pratiques au niveau interne, tout en assurant un environnement transparent, non discriminatoire et prévisible pour les investisseurs et les opérateurs de l'UE présents dans la région. Ses principales dispositions peuvent se résumer comme suit : Dialogue politique : l'accord comprend l'ensemble des clauses de nature politique en tant que volet essentiel reflétant les valeurs de l'UE. Le dialogue politique vise principalement à :
Renforcement de la coopération : la coopération se traduira par des actions concrètes dans tous les aspects d'intérêt commun, y compris le développement économique, la cohésion sociale, les ressources naturelles, la culture, la justice et les sciences. Volet commercial : la partie commerciale de l'accord entre l'UE et l'Amérique centrale définit les conditions dans lesquelles les opérateurs économiques de l'UE peuvent exploiter pleinement les possibilités commerciales et les complémentarités émergentes entre les économies concernées. Au cours de sa mise en œuvre, l'accord libérera pleinement les exportateurs européens de produits industriels et de produits de la pêche destinés à l'Amérique centrale du paiement de droits de douane. Il répond aux critères de l'article XXIV du GATT concernant l'élimination des droits de douane et d'autres réglementations restrictives du commerce pour l'essentiel des échanges commerciaux entre les parties. En outre, il réduira la possibilité, pour l'Amérique centrale, d'adopter des obstacles non tarifaires dans des domaines importants, tels que celui des exigences d'étiquetage des produits textiles. L'Amérique centrale, pour sa part, bénéficiera de nouveaux accès substantiels aux marchés de l'UE, en particulier pour ses principales exportations agricoles: bananes, sucre, viande bovine et rhum, alors que l'UE accordera 100% de franchise de droit aux produits industriels et aux produits de la pêche originaires d'Amérique centrale au moment de l'entrée en vigueur de l'accord. Dans le domaine des services et de la liberté d'établissement, les engagements obtenus des républiques d'Amérique centrale dépassent ceux qu'elles ont souscrits dans le cadre du GATS (accord général sur le commerce des services) et correspondent à des intérêts essentiels de l'UE dans des secteurs importants (notamment, dans les services de télécommunications, les services dans le domaine de l'environnement et les services maritimes, ainsi que dans d'autres services de transport), tout en respectant les sensibilités de l'UE, par exemple quant à la présence temporaire de personnes physiques à des fins professionnelles. En ce qui concerne certains secteurs, les engagements pris par les républiques d'Amérique centrale sont équivalents à ceux d'autres accords conclus par l'Amérique centrale, tels que l'accord de libre-échange de l'Amérique centrale (ALEAC), ou vont même au-delà dans des domaines comme l'accès au marché pour les secteurs autres que les secteurs de services ou dans les services de transport maritime. En ce qui concerne les marchés publics, les accords conclus avec l'Amérique centrale ouvrent un accès important à la fois au niveau des autorités centrales et à des niveaux inférieurs (y compris par exemple les marchés publics liés au canal de Panama). L'accord établit en outre un ensemble de normes qui vont au-delà de ce qui a été convenu dans le cadre multilatéral, notamment en ce qui concerne :
Cadre institutionnel : l'accord crée un cadre institutionnel efficace pour sa mise en œuvre, comprenant un conseil d'association ainsi qu'un comité d'association, soutenus par un ensemble de sous comités, qui seront consultés et travailleront dans les différents domaines couverts dans la partie commerciale de l'accord, ainsi qu'un mécanisme de règlement bilatéral des litiges. Mise en œuvre provisoire : les États membres de l'UE étant également parties à l'accord en raison de certains engagements inscrits dans le protocole relatif à la coopération dans le domaine culturel, ils doivent aussi le ratifier selon leurs procédures internes, ce qui peut prendre un temps considérable. Afin de garantir une application rapide de la partie commerciale de l'accord dans l'attente de sa ratification pleine et entière par les États membres, la Commission propose que celle-ci soit appliquée à titre provisoire. Compte tenu de l'importance de l'accord, la Commission recommande au Conseil d'attendre un certain délai avant d'envoyer les notifications visées à l'article 353, paragraphes 2, 3 et 4, pour permettre au Parlement européen d'exprimer sa position sur l'accord. La partie commerciale de l'accord devrait être appliquée à titre provisoire en 2012. INCIDENCE BUDGÉTAIRE : la proposition n'a pas d'incidence sur le budget de l'UE. New
PURPOSE: to conclude an Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America on the other PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision BACKGROUND: at the European Union - Latin America and Caribbean Summit held in Vienna on 12 - 13 May 2006, the Heads of State and Government of the European Union and of certain Central American Republics decided to open negotiations on an Association Agreement between the two regions, including the establishment of a Free Trade Agreement. Negotiations were formally launched in October 2007 and were successfully concluded in May 2010. The text of the agreement was initialled on 22 March 2011. The proposal aims to conclude the Agreement on behalf of the European Union. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was undertaken. LEGAL BASIS: Article217 in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) TFEU. CONTENT: the Commission proposal aims to conclude the Agreement between the EU and its Member States, of the one part, and Central America, of the other, is hereby approved on behalf of the European Overall the Agreement will lock-in and promote - above and beyond WTO rules - policies of openness and respect at the domestic level for internationally agreed rules and best practices while securing a transparent, non-discriminatory and predictable environment for EU operators and investors in the region. Its main provisions are as follows: Political Dialogue: the Agreement includes all the political clauses as an essential element which reflects EU values. The main objective of the Political Dialogue is:
Strengthening cooperation: cooperation should be manifested in concrete actions in every aspect of common interest, including economic development, social cohesion, natural resources, culture, justice and the sciences. Trade: the trade part of the Agreement between the EU and Central America establishes the conditions for EU economic operators to take full advantage of the opportunities and the emerging complementarities between their respective economies. Over the course of its implementation, the Agreement will fully relieve EU exporters of industrial and fisheries products to Central America from paying customs duties. It satisfies Article XXIV of the GATT criteria to eliminate duties and other restrictive regulations of commerce with respect to substantially all trade between the parties. In addition, it will reduce the scope for Central America to adopt non-tariff barriers in important areas, for example in the field of labelling requirements for textiles. Central America will benefit from substantial new access to the EU market in particular for their key agriculture exports: bananas, sugar, beef and rum while the EU will grant 100% duty-free coverage for industrial products and fisheries of Central America origin at entry into force of the Agreement. On services and establishment, commitments obtained from Central American Republics go beyond their commitments under the GATS (General Agreement on Trade in Services) and match key EU interests in relevant sectors (notably in telecom services, environmental services and maritime services as well as in other transport services) while respecting EU sensitivities, e.g. in terms of temporary presence of natural persons for business purposes. With regard to certain sectors, the commitments offered by Central American Republics reach effective parity with other agreements concluded by Central America such as the CAFTA or even go beyond in areas such as market access in non-services sectors or maritime transport services. In procurement, the deals concluded with Central America provide important access both on the level of central government and below (including for example procurement related to the Panama Canal). The Agreement also establishes a set of disciplines which go beyond those agreed in the multilateral framework notably on:
Institutional framework: the Agreement establishes an effective institutional framework for its implementation including both an Association Council as well as an Association Committee supported by a set of sub-committees to allow for work and consultations on the various areas covered in the trade part of the Agreement and a bilateral dispute settlement mechanism. Provisional application: Member States of the EU will also be Party to this Agreement because of certain commitments in the Protocol on Cultural Co-operation. Accordingly, the Agreement needs to be ratified by them according to their internal procedures. This could take a considerable period of time. In order to ensure prompt application of the trade part of the Agreement pending full ratification by the Member States, the Commission therefore proposes to provisionally apply the trade part. In light of the significance of the Agreement, the Commission considers that the Council should send the notifications referred to in Articles 353(2), 353(3) and 353(4) only after a certain lapse of time so as to allow the European Parliament to express its views on the Agreement. The Commission is ready to work with the Council and the European Parliament so that the trade part of the Agreement can be provisionally applied in 2012. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the EU budget. |
|
| activities/0/docs/0/type | changed |
Old
Publication de la proposition législative initialeNew
Initial legislative proposal published |
|
| activities/0/docs/0/url | changed |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0679/COM_COM(2011)0679_FR.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0679/COM_COM(2011)0679_EN.pdf |
|
| activities/0/type | changed |
Old
Publication de la proposition législative initialeNew
Initial legislative proposal |
|
| activities/1 | added |
|
|
| activities/2 | added |
|
|
| activities/3 | added |
|
|
| activities/4/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
|
| activities/4/date | changed |
Old
2012-12-10New
2012-07-12 |
|
| activities/4/docs | added |
|
|
| activities/4/type | changed |
Old
Débat en plénièreNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
|
| activities/5/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
|
| activities/5/committees | added |
|
|
| activities/5/type | changed |
Old
Annonce en plénière de la saisine de la commission, 1ère lecture/lecture uniqueNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
|
| activities/6/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
|
| activities/6/date | changed |
Old
2012-12-11New
2012-09-12 |
|
| activities/6/docs/0 | deleted |
|
|
| activities/6/docs/0/title | changed |
Old
Résultat du vote au parlementNew
PE492.929 |
|
| activities/6/docs/0/type | changed |
Old
Résultat du vote au parlementNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
|
| activities/6/docs/0/url | changed |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22322&l=frNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE492.929 |
|
| activities/6/docs/1 | deleted |
|
|
| activities/6/type | changed |
Old
Décision du Parlement, 1ère lecture/lecture uniqueNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
|
| activities/7/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
|
| activities/7/committees | added |
|
|
| activities/7/date | changed |
Old
2012-11-08New
2012-10-25 |
|
| activities/7/docs | deleted |
|
|
| activities/7/type | changed |
Old
Dépôt du rapport intérimaire de la commissionNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
|
| activities/8 | added |
|
|
| activities/9/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
|
| activities/9/date | changed |
Old
2012-07-06New
2012-12-10 |
|
| activities/9/docs | deleted |
|
|
| activities/9/type | changed |
Old
Publication de la proposition législativeNew
Debate in Parliament |
|
| activities/10/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
|
| activities/10/date | changed |
Old
2012-10-25New
2012-12-11 |
|
| activities/10/docs | added |
|
|
| activities/10/type | changed |
Old
Vote en commission, 1ère lecture/lecture uniqueNew
Interim resolution adopted by Parliament |
|
| committees/0 | added |
|
|
| committees/1 | added |
|
|
| committees/2 | added |
|
|
| committees/3 | added |
|
|
| committees/4 | added |
|
|
| committees/5 | added |
|
|
| links/Commission européenne | deleted |
|
|
| links/European Commission | added |
|
|
| links/National parliaments | added |
|
|
| links/Parlements nationaux | deleted |
|
|
| other/0 | added |
|
|
| procedure/Base juridique | deleted | Traité sur le fonctionnement de l'UE TFEU 217; Traité sur le fonctionnement de l'UE TFEU 218-p6a | |
| procedure/Dossier de la commission parlementaire | deleted | AFET/7/07836; AFET/7/09662 | |
| procedure/Etape de la procédure | deleted | En attente de décision finale | |
| procedure/Référence de procédure | deleted | 2011/0303(NLE) | |
| procedure/Sous-type de procédure | deleted | Approbation du Parlement | |
| procedure/Type de procédure | deleted | NLE - Procédures non législatives | |
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee | added | AFET/7/07836;AFET/7/09662 | |
| procedure/legal_basis | added |
|
|
| procedure/stage_reached | changed |
Old
En attente de décision finaleNew
Awaiting final decision |
|
| procedure/subject | added |
|
|
| procedure/subtype | added | Consent by Parliament | |
| procedure/sujet | deleted |
|
|
| procedure/title | changed |
Old
Accord d'association UE/Amérique centraleNew
EU/Central America Association Agreement |
|
| procedure/type | changed |
Old
NLE - Procédures non législativesNew
NLE - Non-legislative enactments |
|


