2011/0272(COD)
European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC): clarification, simplification and improvement of the establishment and implementation of groupings
| DEVE | EMPL | REGI | |
| Lead Rapporteur | ZELLER Joachim (EPP) | ||
| Opinion Rapporteur(s) |
Legal basis: TFEU TFEU 175-p3 , TFEU TFEU 209-p1 , TFEU TFEU 212
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opinion | DEVE | ||
| Opinion | EMPL | ||
| Lead | REGI | ZELLER Joachim (EPP) | SMOLKOVÁ Monika (S&D), HYUSMENOVA Filiz Hakaeva (ALDE), GRÈZE Catherine (Verts/ALE), VLASÁK Oldřich (ECR), BUFTON John (EFD) |
Legal Basis TFEU TFEU 175-p3, TFEU TFEU 209-p1, TFEU TFEU 212
Upcomming Committee events
- 2013/05/29 EP: On REGI agenda
Activites
- 2012/06/05 Amendments tabled in committee
- 2012/05/10 Committee draft report
- 2012/02/15 Committee of the Regions: opinion
- 2011/10/25 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2011/10/06
Legislative proposal
-
COM(2011)0610
summary
PURPOSE: to define the next framework for cohesion policy for the period 2014-2020 (clarification, simplification and improvement of the establishment and implementation of European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC). PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. BACKGROUND: in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC), the Commission adopted on 29 July 2011 a Report on the application of the aforementioned Regulation. In that Report, the Commission announced its intention to propose a limited number of modifications to the EGTC Regulation to facilitate the establishment and operation of EGTCs, as well as clarification of certain existing provisions. Obstacles to establishing new EGTCs should be removed while maintaining continuity in and facilitating the operation of existing ones, thus allowing more extensive use of EGTCs to contribute to better cooperation and policy coherence among public bodies without additional burden on national or European administrations. This proposal is part of a package of legislative measures relating to the Cohesion policy 2014-2020. This package includes: an overarching regulation setting out common rules governing the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF), the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF). This will allow for the better combination of funds for a stronger impact of EU action; three specific regulations for the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion Fund; two regulations dealing with the European territorial cooperation goal and the European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC); two regulations on the European Globalisation Fund (EGF) and the Programme for Social Change and Innovation; a communication on the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF). IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out. The Regulation draws on extensive consultation with stakeholders, including Member States, regions and members of existing and planned EGTCs. The message from all groups, and most especially the active EGTCs and those under preparation, was clear: the instrument is useful and has potential going beyond its anticipated functions, but the procedures for operating and especially setting up EGTCs are more complex and uncertain than they should be. LEGAL BASIS: the third subparagraph of Article 175 in conjunction with Articles 209(1) and 212(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: this amending Regulation makes changes, on the one hand, to respect the terminology introduced by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and on the other hand in response to the weaknesses and areas of potential improvement identified in the Report referred to above. The philosophy behind the changes can be expressed in three keywords: Continuity; Clarity; Flexibility.These changes concern: membership: the proposal employs new legal bases to permit regions and bodies in non-Member States to be members of an EGTC, whether the other members are from one or many Member States. The eligibility of membership of bodies under private law is also clarified; the content of the Convention and Statutes of an EGTC, its purpose: under the proposal, the convention and statutes of an EGTC are re-defined and the distinction in approval procedure underlined; the process of approval by national authorities: the proposal stipulates that the criteria for approval or rejection by national authorities are specified, and a limited time for examination proposed (this is the single most frequently heard complaint from existing and planned EGTCs); applicable law for employment and for procurement: solutions, in line with the acquis of the Union, are proposed for tax and social security regimes for employees of an EGTC, who may be employed in any of the Member States whose territories comprise the EGTC. A similar approach is proposed for procurement rules; liability: where some local or regional bodies are required by their national laws to have limited liability and others, in different Member States, are required to have unlimited liability, an insurance-based solution modelled on that used for European Research Infrastructure Consortia (ERIC) is proposed; more transparent procedures for communication:Member States will be required to inform the Commission of any provisions adopted to implement the EGTC Regulation, as amended, and each newly established EGTC should inform the Commission of its purpose and membership, for publication in the Official Journal (C Series). BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the EGTC Regulation is not a financial regulation and carries no budgetary implications for the Union or for Member States. EGTCs may be funded by local, regional or national funds and may carry out actions that are co-funded by European funds. DELEGATED ACTS: this proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
- DG {u'url': u'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm', u'title': u'Regional Policy'}, HAHN Johannes
-
COM(2011)0610
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0610
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0371/2011
- Committee draft report: PE489.428
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE491.049
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 29 |
2011/0272(COD) European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC): clarification, simplification and improvement of the establishment and implementation of groupings
2012/05/06
REGI
29 amendments...
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 2 (2) In that Report, the Commission announced its intention to propose a limited number of modifications to the EGTC Regulation to facilitate the establishment and operation of EGTCs, as well as clarification of certain existing provisions. Obstacles to establishing new EGTCs, including, where the outermost regions are concerned, the maximum distance of 150 km, should be removed while maintaining continuity in and facilitating the operation of existing ones, thus allowing more extensive use of EGTCs to contribute to better cooperation and policy coherence among public bodies without additional burdens on national or European administrations.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3 (3)
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 4 (4) The Treaty of Lisbon has added the territorial dimension to Cohesion Policy and replaced “Community” by the “Union”. The new terminology should therefore be introduced into the EGTC Regulation and at the same time find visible practical expression, given that the object is to promote the harmonious development of the European Union as a whole and it is, to that extent, unfair to exclude the outermost regions from the outset.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 4 a (new) Article 174 of the TFEU states that particular attention must be paid to rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps such as the northernmost regions with very low population density and island, cross- border, and mountain regions.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 4 b (new) (4b) Article 349 of the TFEU calls for specific measures to be adopted to take account of the structural social and economic situation of the outermost regions, which is compounded by certain specific features which severely restrain their development.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 5 (5) Experience with EGTCs set up so far shows that the new legal instrument is also being used for cooperation in the implementation of other European policies. The efficiency and effectiveness of EGTCs should be enhanced by broadening the nature of EGTCs, to find possibilities for such types of cooperation beyond Cohesion Policy as well. EGTCs have the potential to re-activating the economy and meeting the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy. Particular attention should be paid to cooperation with regard the enhancement of the labour market.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 5 (5) Experience with EGTCs set up so far shows that the new legal instrument is also being used for cooperation in the implementation of other European policies.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 7 a (new) (7a) EGTCs often associate different administrative levels and so realise systems of multilevel governance. More flexibility in management structures is therefore needed for effective functioning of complex systems.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 8 (8) While point (d) of Article 3(1) of the EGTC Regulation allows that bodies established under private law may become members of an EGTC provided that they are considered as being ‘public law bodies’ in terms of Article 1(9) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, EGTCs may be used in the future to manage jointly public services
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 12 a (new) (12a) It should be made clear that fostering territorial cooperation between these regions, regarded as outposts of the EU, strengthens relations and helps to promote new markets for European regions, taking advantage of the historical and cultural synergies existing between these regions and other countries in the world.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Given their potential as a means of giving effect to Union initiatives and projects and of implementing European sectoral policy programmes, and the need for them to be made eligible for such initiatives, projects, and programmes, European groupings of territorial cooperation deserve to have a higher profile and should be integrated more fully into European and national legal systems, in keeping with the principles of legal security and certainty.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 14 (14) Experience from the setting up of EGTCs shows that the three months period for approval by a Member State has rarely been respected. The period should therefore be extended to six months. On the other hand, in order to create legal certainty after that period, the convention should be deemed to be approved by tacit agreement. While Member States may apply national rules on the procedure for such approval or may create specific rules in the framework of the national rules implementing the EGTC Regulation, derogations to the provision concerning tacit agreement after the period of six months should be ruled out. The 6 month period provided for the Member State to approve the set up of EGTCs should allow enough time to the Member State to express its concerns with regard the establishment of EGTCs, and also for the applicants to take necessary steps to improve their application.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 14 (14) Experience from the setting up of EGTCs shows that the three months period for approval by a Member State has rarely been respected. The period should therefore be extended to
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 17 a (new) (17a) Stronger participation of civil society organisations in the establishment of EGTCs and also in the possibility of acceding existing EGTCs should be strongly encouraged.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 19 (19) The purpose of an EGTC should be extended to cover the facilitating and promotion of territorial cooperation in general,
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 19 (19) The purpose of an EGTC should be extended to cover the facilitating and promotion of territorial cooperation in general, including strategic planning and the management of regional and local concerns in line with Cohesion and other Union policies, thus contributing to the Europe 2020 strategy or to the implementation of macro-regional strategies.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 26 (26) It should be clarified that the convention – and given the importance of this issue, not the statutes – should indicate the rules applicable to the EGTC’s staff as well as the principles governing the arrangements concerning personnel management and recruitment procedures. Several options should be available to the EGTCs. One such option is to acquire the status specific to the staff of European Union agencies. However, the specific arrangements concerning personnel management and recruitment procedures should be addressed in the statutes.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 32 (32) Coordinated efforts for awareness raising among the institutions, the Member States and the regions with regard the potentials the EGTCs carry in themselves should be undertaken, in order to improve the visibility of the possibilities to use EGTCs as instruments available for cross-border cooperation in all EU policy areas. It should be clarified that Member States inform the Commission about any provisions adopted to implement the EGTC Regulation and to submit these provisions as well as any amendments thereof. In order to improve the information and coordination between the Commission, the Member States and the Committee of the Regions, it should be specified that the Commission will transmit these provisions to the Member States and to the Committee of the Regions. That Committee has set up an EGTC platform allowing all the stakeholders to exchange their experiences and good practices and to improve communication on EGTC opportunities and challenges, facilitating the exchange of experiences on the establishment of EGTCs at territorial level and sharing knowledge of best practices on territorial cooperation.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 Article 2 – paragraph 1 An EGTC shall be considered to be an entity of the Member State where it has its registered office for the purposes of determining the applicable law. However, the other Member States which are stakeholders in the EGTC must recognise the specific provisions adopted by the above procedure.”
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point b Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. An EGTC shall be made up of members drawn from the territory of at least two Member States, except as provided for in Article 3a(2), and shall be competent to act on behalf of its members for the purpose of implementing cooperation projects and programmes.”
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new) (ea) organisations representing civil society.”
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point a – subparagraph 1 Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 Article 4 – paragraph 3 Following notification under paragraph 2 by a prospective member, the Member State concerned shall approve the convention, taking into account its constitutional structure, and the prospective member’s participation in the EGTC, unless it considers that such participation is not in conformity with this Regulation, other Union law concerning the activities of the EGTC or national law concerning the competences of the prospective member or that such participation is not justified for reasons of public interest or of public policy of that Member State. In such a case, the Member State shall give a statement of its reasons for withholding agreement or shall suggest the necessary amendments to the convention to enable the prospective member’s participation. The 6 month period provided for the Member State to approve the set up of EGTCs has to allow enough time to the Member State to express its concerns with regard the application submitted and also for the applicants to react on the concerns and eliminate shortcomings of the application. Any delays in the process should be avoided and the 6 month period for the approval process should under no conditions be prolonged.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point a – subparagraph 2 Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 Article 4 – paragraph 3 The Member State shall reach its decision within a deadline of
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – paragraph 8 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. An EGTC shall act within the confines of the tasks given to it, which shall be the facilitation and promotion of territorial cooperation to strengthen economic, social and territorial cohesion, overcoming internal market barriers, and be determined by its members on the basis that they fall within the competence under national law of at least one member from each Member State represented in that EGTC.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – paragraph 8 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 An EGTC may carry out specific actions of territorial cooperation between its members in pursuit of the objective referred to in Article 1(2), with or without a financial support from the Union. Their taxation, conditions for funding through public- private partnerships should also be improved.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – paragraph 8 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Specifically, the tasks of an EGTC may concern the implementation of cooperation programmes or parts thereof
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – paragraph 8 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – paragraph 8 – point a Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 Member States may not limit the actions that EGTCs may carry out with
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 4 Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 Article 8 – paragraph 2 To allow equal treatment of all staff working at the same location, the national laws and rules, whether of public or private law, may be subject to additional ad hoc rules fixed by the EGTC. These may be modelled on the European status accorded to staff of Union agencies.”
source: PE-491.049
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| activities/1/committees/2/shadows/0 | added |
|
|
| activities/1/committees/2/shadows/2 | added |
|
|
| activities/1/committees/2/shadows/3/group | changed |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
ECR |
|
| activities/1/committees/2/shadows/3/mepref | changed |
Old
4f1ac454b819f25896000006New
4de1893a0fb8127435bdc457 |
|
| activities/1/committees/2/shadows/3/name | changed |
Old
OMARJEE YounousNew
VLASÁK Oldřich |
|
| committees/2/shadows/0 | added |
|
|
| committees/2/shadows/2 | added |
|
|
| committees/2/shadows/3/group | changed |
Old
GUE/NGLNew
ECR |
|
| committees/2/shadows/3/mepref | changed |
Old
4f1ac454b819f25896000006New
4de1893a0fb8127435bdc457 |
|
| committees/2/shadows/3/name | changed |
Old
OMARJEE YounousNew
VLASÁK Oldřich |
|


