2011/0197(COD)
Harmonisation of recreational crafts and personal watercrafts
Next event: 2013/09/09 Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
| ENVI | IMCO | TRAN | |
| Lead Rapporteur | HARBOUR Malcolm (ECR) | ||
| Opinion Rapporteur(s) | TATARELLA Salvatore (EPP) | ZĪLE Roberts (ECR) |
Legal basis: TFEU TFEU 114-p1
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2013/09/09
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opinion | ENVI | TATARELLA Salvatore (EPP) | |
| Lead | IMCO | HARBOUR Malcolm (ECR) | SCHWAB Andreas (EPP), REPO Mitro (S&D), MANDERS Toine (ALDE), RÜHLE Heide (Verts/ALE), SALVINI Matteo (EFD) |
| Opinion | TRAN | ZĪLE Roberts (ECR) |
Legal Basis TFEU TFEU 114-p1
Upcomming Committee events
- 2013/05/29 EP: On IMCO agenda
- 2.10.03 Standardisation, EC standards and trade mark, certification, compliance
- 3.20.03.01 Maritime safety
- 3.40.04 Shipbuilding, nautical industry
- 3.70.02 Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
- 3.70.05 Marine and coastal pollution, pollution from ships, oil pollution
- 3.70.07 Noise pollution
- 4.60.08 Safety of products and services, product liability
Activites
-
2013/09/09
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
-
2012/06/26
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
-
A7-0213/2012
summary
The Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the report by Malcolm HARBOUR (ECR, UK) on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on recreational craft and personal watercraft. The parliamentary committee recommends that the European Parliaments position at first reading, following the ordinary legislative procedure, amends the Commission proposal as follows: Scope of application: an amendment clarifies thatwatercraft also used for charter or for recreational boating training shall also be covered by this Directive. Definitions: Members introduced changes to the definitions: recreational craft: recreational craft means any vessel of any type intended for sports and leisure purposes of hull length from 2.5 m to 24 m, measured according to the harmonised standard, regardless of the means of propulsion; personal watercraft: the proposed definition is replaces with that in Directive 2003/44/EC which is the international definition including the relevant ISO standard; propulsion engine: the amendment ensures all types of hybrid installation will have to confirm to the exhaust emission requirements of Annex I. B; major craft conversion: the amendment provides a more precise definition to avoid that any change to the engines attributes inadvertently qualifies as a major conversion manufacturer: the amendment addresses the current ambiguity faced by those manufacturers who adapt engines for marine use and do not change the emissions characteristics of the engine, ensuring they are now clearly able to use the original engine manufacturer's proof of conformity. Exchanges of best practice: the Commission should facilitate the exchange of best practices between Member States by setting up an adequate system for such exchanges. Members take the view that such an exchange of views on best practices would help to avoid disproportionate measures. Free movement: an amendment stipulates that the Member States shall not impede the making available on the market or putting into service of propulsion engines, whether or not installed in watercraft, which comply with this Directive. Manufacturers obligations: an amendment clarifies that manufacturers must ensure that their product is accompanied by instructions and safety information provided in a language or languages easily understood by consumers and other end-users in the Member States in which they place their products on the market. That language shall be determined by the Member State concerned. Objections to a harmonised standard: a horizontal legislative revision of the EU standardisation system is currently underway which covers this general provision on objections to standards; Members propose the deletion of this article in this proposal for a sectoral Directive. Restoration of the rules in force since 1994: Members wish to maintain the existing testing by notified bodies on large craft over 12m likely to sail in the open sea. Changes to Annex I: Members amendments seek to: provide more details on the precise application of a certain number of important safety requirements (buoyancy, electricity, gas and ventilation of fuel tanks); offer an up-to-date system for the definition of boat design categories which removes the existing link between design category and intended use according to geographical location (e.g. off shore or sheltered waters) to instead leave wind strength and wave height as the main 2 parameters. Report: no later than five years after the date of transposition, and and taking into account any major market initiatives, the Commission shall submit a report on the technical feasibility of further reducing the emissions of recreational marine engines, taking into account the cost-efficiency of technologies and the need to agree globally harmonised values for the sector. The report shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal to that effect. Review: in the two years following the date of transposition, the Commission shall present a report on the impact of the boat design categories listed in Annex I, which are based on resistance to wind force and wave height, taking into account developments in international standardisation. That report shall include an evaluation of whether the boat design categories require additional specifications or subdivisions, in order to provide better information on actual use for consumers. The report shall also include an evaluation of the impact for the boat manufacturing industry. Where appropriate, it shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal.
- ENVI TATARELLA Salvatore EPP
- IMCO IMCO/7/06714 HARBOUR Malcolm ECR
- TRAN ZĪLE Roberts ECR
-
A7-0213/2012
summary
- 2012/06/21 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- 2012/04/02 Amendments tabled in committee
- 2012/02/10 Committee draft report
- 2011/12/08 Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
- 2011/09/13 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2011/07/26
Legislative proposal
-
COM(2011)0456
summary
PURPOSE: to set stricter limits for NOx, hydrocarbons (HC) and particulate matters for new recreational crafts. PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council. BACKGROUND: the Recreational Craft Directive 94/25/ECwas adopted in 1994 to regulate the placing on the market of pleasure boats on the European market. It was amended by Directive 2003/44/EC which introduces a set of limit values for exhaust emissions for propulsion engines and noise levels for watercrafts with propulsion engines, for both the compression ignition (CI) engines and the spark ignition (SI) engines. Furthermore, it enlarges the scope of the Recreational Craft Directive to cover also personal watercraft. The same amending Directive provides a review clause which aims at reinforcing emission limits to reflect the technological progress of recreational marine engines as well as the need to harmonise the limits worldwide, particularly with the US. At the same time the vulnerable position of the SMEs should be taken into account as this sector consists mainly of small and medium enterprises (more than 95% of businesses are SMEs). The Commission issued a report in 2007 in which it announced that it would assess options to further reducing the exhaust emission limits of recreational marine engines. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the impact assessment focuses on the following three areas of the revision having substantial impacts: A. Exhaust emission limits for engines Option 1 - No change (existing exhaust emissions are maintained). Option 2 - Stricter exhaust emission limits (Stage II): in the context of this option, the scenario harmonises the limits with the US for both: Spark ignition (SI) engines and compression ignition (CI) engines. Option 3 - Stricter exhaust emission limits (Stage II) combined with mitigating measures to limit negative economic/social effects: Sub-option 3.1 - Use of a flexibility scheme. Sub-option 3.2 - Use of a transitional period for all engine manufacturers (3 years). Sub-option 3.3 - Use of a transitional period for all engine manufacturers + a specific transitional period for small and medium sized engine manufacturers placing on the EU market the SI outboard engines < 15 kW (3+3 years). This last sub-option was selected in the impact assessment as the preferable option. B. Noise emission limits for watercrafts with propulsion engines. Option 1 - No change (existing noise emission limits are maintained). Option 2 - Stricter noise emission limits. Option 1 (keeping the current limit values) was found to be the preferred option. C. Alignment of the RCD with the New Legislative Framework: the Commission is engaged to align the sectorial legislation to the new legislative framework, the impact assessment concentrated in analysing the impacts of the alignment only. These impacts should be mostly positive, since the horizontal provisions are clarifying certain issues which are subject to uncertainty for the moment. LEGAL BASIS: Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the main elements of the proposed revision are as follows: Clarifying scope and concepts of the Directive: in the past, there have been debates about the content of the term "recreational craft" in the Directive which has been sometimes claimed to be an overall term covering both recreational craft and personal watercraft. This lack of clarity is now eliminated by introducing into the definitions a new overall concept "watercraft" which covers both recreational craft and personal watercraft. For reasons of consistency and clarification it is also specified that only personal watercraft intended for sports and leisure is included in the Directive, and not for instance personal watercraft intended for rescue and police services. General safety requirement: it is necessary to specify explicitly that that products covered by this Directive may only be placed on the market or put into service if they meet the general requirement imposing them to be without danger to the safety and health of persons, property or environment and only if they meet the essential requirements set out in Annex I. Exhaust emissions: new stricter limits are foreseen for the exhaust emission of Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Hydrocarbons (HC) and the Particulates (PT). For CI engines these limits are set applying the US EPA standards for marine diesel recreational engines (40 CFR Part 1042). For SI engines, the limits are set using the US EPA emission standards for new non-road SI engines, equipment and vessels (40 CFR Part 1045). A general three years transitional period for the industry is foreseen. In addition, as regards exhaust emission requirements, a supplementary 3 years is granted to SME engine manufacturers who place on the market the SI engines below 15 kW. Constructional requirements: a new requirement is foreseen to impose mandatory installation of holding tanks to watercraft fitted with toilets in order to contribute to the marine environmental protection. Post construction assessment and private importer: Directive 94/25/EC contains rules on the post construction assessment of recreational craft which is carried out by any natural or legal person established within the Community who places the product on the market in cases, where neither the manufacturer, nor his authorized representative fulfils the responsibilities for evaluating the conformity of products to the Directive. For consistency, it is appropriate to extent the scope of this procedure to cover not only recreational craft but also personal watercraft. For clarity, it must be specified by whom and in which situations exactly this procedure can be used. These are: private importer, that is a natural or legal person who imports in the course of non-commercial activity a product from a third country into the Union with the intention of putting it into service for his own use; any person placing on the market or putting into service an engine or a watercraft after a major modification or conversion thereof or any person changing the intended purpose of a watercraft not covered by the scope this Directive in a way that it falls under its scope; any person placing on the market a watercraft built for own use before the end of the 5 year period. As regards importing recreational craft and personal watercraft, it should be noted that compared to Directive 94/25/EC, the use of Post construction assessments is restricted to cases of non commercial import by private importers. In order to ensure a reliable assessment of the conformity of the product by the notified body with regard to the post construction assessment, there is a need to widen the obligations of the person asking for the post construction assessment to provide documents to the notified body. It is foreseen that he has to provide all the documents necessary for the assessment of the conformity of the product. Affixing of the CE-marking:the CE marking must be affixed on the watercraft, engines and components. In case of components, where that are not possible or not warranted on account of the size or nature of that product, it can alternatively be affixed to the packaging and to the accompanying documents. Reporting: in order to enforce the monitoring and the efficiency of this Directive, a new obligation is foreseen for the Member States to send every 5 years a report on the application of the Directive to the Commission. Aligning the Recreational Craft Directive with the New Legislative Framework (NLF) and the applicable conformity assessment procedures: consequently to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 and of Decision 768/2008/EC, the Recreational Craft Directive has to be brought in line with the principles of New Legislative Framework. It means basically the inclusion of the chapters describing the obligations of economic operators, the competences of conformity assessment bodies and market surveillance authorities, new conformity assessment modules and the status of CE marking. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no budgetary implication for the Union budget. DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
- SEC(2011)0959
- DG {u'url': u'http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/', u'title': u'Enterprise and Industry'}, TAJANI Antonio
-
COM(2011)0456
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0456
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0959
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1851/2011
- Committee draft report: PE480.885
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE486.112
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0213/2012
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 40 |
2011/0197(COD) Harmonisation of recreational crafts and personal watercrafts
2012/02/04
IMCO
27 amendments...
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Decision No 768/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on a common framework for the marketing of products provides common principles and reference provisions for the purposes of legislation based on the New Approach principles. In order to ensure consistency with other sectoral product legislation, it is appropriate to align certain provisions of this Directive to that Decision, in so far as sectoral specificities do not require a different solution. Therefore, certain definitions, the general obligations of economic operators, the presumption of conformity,
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 a (new) (20a) For engines adapted for marine use, where the source engine is already type- approved in accordance with Directive 97/68/EC1 or Directive 2005/55/EC2, manufacturers should be able to rely on the proof of conformity issued by the original engine manufacturer where those adaptations have not altered exhaust emission characteristics. Accordingly, the definition of manufacturer set out in this Directive should be adapted to clarify what is covered in the scope of "manufacturing" activity. ______________ 1 Directive 97/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1997 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non- road mobile machinery (OJ L 59, 27.2.1998, p. 1). 2 Directive 2005/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 September 2005 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the measures to be taken against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from compression-ignition engines for use in vehicles, and the emission of gaseous pollutants from positive-ignition engines fuelled with natural gas or liquefied petroleum gas for use in vehicles (OJ L 275, 20.10.2005, p. 1).
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) Depending on the fuel and power category, the test cycles for engines in marine applications described in the relevant ISO standard should be used. Test cycles should be developed for all combustion engines which are part of the propulsion system, including hybrid power installations.
Amendment 43 #
Recital 28 (28) It is crucial to make clear to both manufacturers and users that by affixing the CE marking to
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 a (new) (31a) In order to provide clear information about the acceptable operating environment of watercraft, the titles of the boat design categories, which were potentially misleading for users, should now be based on the essential environmental conditions for navigation, namely wind force and wave height, instead of indicating the area and type of navigation.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 b (new) (31b) The environmental conditions mentioned in design category A may be encountered on extended voyages, for example across oceans, or inshore when unsheltered from the wind and waves for several hundred nautical miles. The conditions mentioned in design category B may be encountered on offshore voyages of sufficient length or on coasts where shelter may not always be immediately available. Such conditions may also be experienced on inland seas of sufficient size for the wave height to be generated. The conditions mentioned in design category C may be encountered on exposed inland waters, in estuaries, and in coastal waters in moderate weather conditions. The conditions mentioned in design category D may be encountered on sheltered inland waters, and in coastal waters in fine weather.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) In order to take into account the progress of technical knowledge and new scientific evidence, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to amend Section 2 of Part B of Annex I, in particular to include test cycles for hybrid engines and to introduce biofuel blended test fuels in the table of test fuels once these test fuels have been internationally accepted, and Section 1 of Part C of Annex I, with the exception of direct or indirect modifications to exhaust or noise emission values and to the Froude and P/D ratio values, and Annexes V, VII and IX. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 2 2. ‘recreational craft’ means any
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 13 13. ‘manufacturer’ means any natural or legal person who manufactures a product or has such a product designed or manufactured and markets that product under his name or trademark; this shall include any natural or legal person who adapts engines for marine use where the source engine is already type-approved in accordance with Directive 97/68/EC or Directive 2005/55/EC without altering the exhaust emissions characteristics of the engine;
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall not impede the making available on the market or putting into service of
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Paragraph 4 shall also apply to: (a) engines type-approved in accordance with Directive 97/68/EC which are in compliance with stage IIIA, IIIB or IV emission limits for CI engines used in other applications than propulsion of inland waterway vessels, locomotives and railcars, as provided for in point 4.1.2. of Annex I to that Directive; and (b) engines type-approved in accordance with Directive 2005/55/EC; where the manufacturer declares in accordance with point 9 of Annex IV that the engine will meet the exhaust emission requirements of this Directive when installed in a watercraft in accordance with the manufacturer's supplied instructions.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Where compliance of a product with the applicable requirements has been demonstrated by that procedure, manufacturers shall draw up an EU declaration of conformity, as referred to in Article 16 and affix the CE marking, as set out in Article 18(1), which may be inspected at any time.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 7 7. Manufacturers shall ensure that the product is accompanied by instructions and safety information in a language or languages which can be easily understood by consumers and other end-users
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 33 Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 2 The amendments referred to in point (a) may include amendments to reference fuels and to the requirements for exhaust and noise emissions testing and to durability criteria. In particular such amendments may include test cycles for hybrid engines and introduce biofuel blended test fuels in the table of test fuels set out in Section 2 of Part B of Annex I once those test fuels have been agreed in the form of internationally accepted standards.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 53 a (new) Article 53a Review By ...*, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the feasibility of introducing a system of boat design categories based on resistance to wind force and wave height, taking into account the developments in international standardisation. That report shall include an evaluation of the impact of the introduction of such a system for the boat manufacturing industry. Where appropriate, it shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal. _____________ * OJ: Please insert the date: two years after the date referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 57(1).
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 58 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall not impede the making available on the market or the putting into service of products covered by Directive 94/25/EC which are in conformity with that Directive and which were placed on the market or put into service before
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Article 58 a (new) Article 58a New legislative proposals The Commission shall consider submitting legislative proposals to the European Parliament and the Council for harmonising watercraft licences at EU level, introducing technical inspections on board vessels at regular (five-yearly) intervals to check the safety of on-board equipment that uses gas – and of other explosive gases – so as to ensure that the vessels comply with the safety requirements at all times, and preventing tax evasion by discouraging the use of agricultural diesel.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – part A – point 1 – point A A.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – part A – point 1 – point A A. OCEAN:
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – part A – point 1 – point B B.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – part A – point 1 – point C C.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – part A – point 1 – point D D.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – part A – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1 – point 30 (
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – part A – point 5 – point 5.1 – point 5.1.5 a (new) 5.1.5a. Tiller-controlled outboard engines Tiller-controlled outboard engines shall be equipped with an emergency stopping device which can be linked to the helmsman (emergency stop switch with lanyard).
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – part A – subpart 5 – point 5.3 – paragraph 3 Ventilation shall be provided to prevent the accumulation of
source: PE-486.112
2012/03/27
ENVI
13 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) Depending on the fuel and power category, the test cycles for engines in marine applications described in the relevant ISO standard should be used. A special test cycle for marine hybrid power installations should be developed for hybrid power installations that have different technical characteristics from standard internal combustion engines.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 a (new) (26a) Member States should check whether they take effective regionally- specific national measures, such as the introduction or adjustment of speed limits, in order to reduce noise emissions as much as possible.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 (28)
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) In order to take into account the progress of technical knowledge and new scientific evidence, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to amend Section 2 of Part B and Section 1 of Part C of Annex I, with the exception of direct or indirect modifications to exhaust or noise emission values with the effect of reducing the level of protection of the environment, and to the Froude and P/D ratio values, and Annexes V, VII and IX. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a – point xiii (xiii) amphibious craft able to operate both on water and dry land;
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 2 a (new) 2a. “Boat” means a vessel for travel over water propelled by oars, paddles, sails or an engine;
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 The provisions of this Directive shall not prevent Member States from adopting provisions concerning navigation on
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Member States may restrict the use of personal watercraft to certain areas and hours of day in order to safeguard other competing public interests.
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – indent 1 – where the harmonised standards relating to points 3.2 and 3.3 of Part A of Annex I are complied with:
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) point 2 of Part B and point 1 of Part C of Annex I, excluding direct or indirect modifications to exhaust or noise emission values with the effect of reducing the level of protection of the environment, and to the Froude and P/D ratio values;
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – part A – point 2 – point 2.3 – paragraph 1 Watercraft shall be designed to minimise the risks of falling overboard and
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – part A – point 5 – point 5.8 – paragraph 2 Watercraft fitted with toilets shall have holding tanks or water treatment systems connected to each toilet.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Annex I – part C – point 1 – point 1.1 – table Rated Engine Power Maximum Sound Pressure (single engine) Level = LpASmax In kW In dB PN ≤ 10 6
source: PE-486.091
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| activities/0/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EC |
|
| activities/0/commission | added |
|
|
| activities/0/docs/0/text/0 | changed |
Old
OBJECTIF : abaisser encore les limites des émissions gazeuses produites par les moteurs des bateaux de plaisance. ACTE PROPOSÉ : Directive du Parlement européen et du Conseil. CONTEXTE : la directive 94/25/CE a été adoptée afin de réglementer la mise sur le marché européen des bateaux de plaisance. La directive de 1994 a été modifiée par la directive 2003/44/CE qui introduit une série de valeurs limites en ce qui concerne les émissions gazeuses des moteurs de propulsion et les émissions sonores des bateaux équipés d'un moteur de propulsion. De plus, elle élargit le champ d'application de la directive relative aux bateaux de plaisance de manière à couvrir également les véhicules nautiques à moteur. Cette même directive modificatrice prévoit une clause de révision qui vise à renforcer les limites d'émission afin de tenir compte des améliorations technologiques apportées aux moteurs des bateaux de plaisance et de la nécessité d'harmoniser les limites au niveau international, en particulier avec les États-Unis. Parallèlement, il importe de tenir compte de la situation fragile des PME, car ce secteur se compose essentiellement de petites et moyennes entreprises (plus de 95% des entreprises sont des PME). La Commission a publié un rapport en 2007 dans lequel elle annonçait qu'elle examinerait les possibilités d'abaisser encore les limites des émissions gazeuses produites par les moteurs des bateaux de plaisance. ANALYSE D'IMPACT : l'analyse d'impact est axée sur trois domaines compte tenu de leurs répercussions significatives: A. Limites des émissions gazeuses des moteurs : Option 1 - Statu quo (maintien des limites existantes). Option 2 - Des limites plus strictes des émissions gazeuses (phase II) : dans le cadre de cette option, le scénario retenu harmonise les limites avec les États-Unis aussi bien pour les moteurs à explosion que pour les moteurs à allumage par compression. Option 3 - Des limites plus strictes des émissions gazeuses (phase II) associées à des mesures d'atténuation visant à limiter les répercussions économiques/sociales : · Sous-option 3.1 - Recours à un mécanisme de flexibilité. · Sous-option 3.2 - Utilisation d'une période transitoire pour tous les fabricants de moteurs (3 ans). · Sous-option 3.3 - Utilisation d'une période transitoire pour tous les fabricants de moteurs et d'une période transitoire spécifique pour les PME qui fabriquent et mettent sur le marché de l'UE des moteurs hors-bords à explosion < 15 kW (3+3 ans). Cette dernière sous-option a été retenue dans l'analyse d'impact comme étant la plus appropriée. B. Limites des émissions sonores des bateaux équipés d'un moteur de propulsion : Option 1 - Statu quo (maintien des valeurs limites existantes). Option 2 - Des limites plus strictes des émissions sonores. L'option 1 (maintien des valeurs limites existantes) a été considérée comme l'option la plus appropriée. C. Alignement de la directive relative aux bateaux de plaisance sur le nouveau cadre législatif : la Commission s'étant engagée à aligner la législation sectorielle sur le nouveau cadre législatif, l'analyse d'impact a été axée sur les effets de l'alignement uniquement. Ces effets seraient globalement positifs, puisque les dispositions horizontales clarifient certains points aujourd'hui obscurs. BASE JURIDIQUE : article 114 du traité sur le fonctionnement de l'Union européenne (TFUE). CONTENU : les principaux éléments de la révision proposée sont les suivants : Clarification du champ d'application de la directive et des concepts utilisés : un nouveau concept général «bateaux» couvrant à la fois les bateaux de plaisance et les véhicules nautiques à moteur est introduit dans les définitions. Il est également spécifié que seuls les véhicules nautiques à moteur destinés aux activités sportives et de loisir sont inclus dans la directive, et non par exemple les véhicules destinés aux services de sauvetage et de police. Obligation générale de sécurité : il est précisé explicitement que les produits couverts par la directive peuvent uniquement être mis sur le marché ou mis en service s'ils respectent les exigences générales qui leur imposent de ne pas mettre en danger la sécurité et la santé des personnes, les biens et l'environnement, et sous réserve qu'ils satisfassent aux exigences essentielles énoncées à l'annexe I. Émissions gazeuses : de nouvelles limites plus strictes sont prévues pour les émissions gazeuses d'oxydes d'azote (NOx), d'hydrocarbures (HC) et de particules (PT). Pour les moteurs à allumage par compression, les limites sont celles fixées par l'Agence américaine de protection de l'environnement (EPA) dans la norme 40 CFR Part 1042 relative aux moteurs diesel des bateaux de plaisance. Pour les moteurs à explosion, les limites sont celles fixées par l'EPA dans la norme 40 CFR Part 1045 relative aux nouveaux moteurs à explosion non routiers et aux équipements et bateaux qui en sont munis. Une période transitoire générale de trois ans est prévue pour l'industrie. De plus, en ce qui concerne les exigences liées aux émissions gazeuses, un délai supplémentaire de trois ans est octroyé aux PME qui fabriquent et mettent sur le marché des moteurs à explosion d'une puissance inférieure à 15 kW. Exigences relatives à la construction : il est prévu une nouvelle exigence rendant obligatoire l'installation de réservoirs sur les bateaux équipés de toilettes afin de contribuer à la protection de l'environnement marin. Évaluation après construction et importateur privé : la directive 94/25/CE prévoit que, lorsque ni le fabricant ni son mandataire n'assument les responsabilités relatives à la conformité du produit avec la directive, celles-ci peuvent être assumées par toute personne physique ou morale établie dans la Communauté qui met le produit sur le marché. Pour des raisons de cohérence, il est proposé d'élargir la portée de cette procédure de façon à couvrir non seulement les bateaux de plaisance, mais également les véhicules nautiques à moteur. Dans un souci de clarté, la proposition spécifie par qui et dans quels cas précis cette procédure peut être utilisée. Sont ainsi concernés:
En ce qui concerne l'importation de bateaux de plaisance et de véhicules nautiques à moteur, l'utilisation de l'évaluation après construction ne concerne que l'importation non commerciale effectuée par des importateurs privés. Enfin, il est proposé d'étendre les obligations qui pèsent sur la personne demandant l'évaluation après construction à la fourniture de documents à l'organisme notifié. Il est ainsi prévu qu'elle communique tous les documents nécessaires à l'évaluation de la conformité du produit. Apposition du marquage CE : la proposition fixe les règles régissant l'apposition du marquage CE sur les bateaux, les éléments ou pièces d'équipement et les moteurs. Le marquage CE doit être apposé sur les bateaux et les moteurs ainsi que sur leurs éléments ou pièces d'équipement. Dans ce dernier cas, lorsque la nature du produit ne le permet pas ou ne le justifie pas, le marquage peut être apposé sur son emballage et sur les documents accompagnant le produit. Rapports : afin de garantir le suivi et l'efficacité de la directive, une nouvelle obligation est prévue pour les États membres qui sont tenus de transmettre tous les cinq ans à la Commission un rapport sur l'application de la directive. Alignement de la directive relative aux bateaux de plaisance sur le nouveau cadre législatif (NCL) et sur les procédures applicables en matière d'évaluation de la conformité : à la suite de l'adoption du règlement (CE) n° 765/2008 et de la décision n° 768/2008/CE, la directive relative aux bateaux de plaisance doit être harmonisée avec les principes du nouveau cadre législatif. Pour l'essentiel, cela se traduit par l'inclusion des chapitres décrivant les obligations des opérateurs économiques, les compétences des organes d'évaluation de la conformité et des autorités de surveillance du marché, les nouveaux modules d'évaluation de la conformité et le statut du marquage CE. INCIDENCE BUDGÉTAIRE : la proposition n'a aucune incidence sur le budget de l'Union. ACTES DÉLÉGUÉS : la proposition contient des dispositions habilitant la Commission à adopter des actes délégués conformément à l'article 290 du traité sur le fonctionnement de l'Union européenne. New
PURPOSE: to set stricter limits for NOx, hydrocarbons (HC) and particulate matters for new recreational crafts. PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council. BACKGROUND: the Recreational Craft Directive 94/25/ECwas adopted in 1994 to regulate the placing on the market of pleasure boats on the European market. It was amended by Directive 2003/44/EC which introduces a set of limit values for exhaust emissions for propulsion engines and noise levels for watercrafts with propulsion engines, for both the compression ignition (CI) engines and the spark ignition (SI) engines. Furthermore, it enlarges the scope of the Recreational Craft Directive to cover also personal watercraft. The same amending Directive provides a review clause which aims at reinforcing emission limits to reflect the technological progress of recreational marine engines as well as the need to harmonise the limits worldwide, particularly with the US. At the same time the vulnerable position of the SMEs should be taken into account as this sector consists mainly of small and medium enterprises (more than 95% of businesses are SMEs). The Commission issued a report in 2007 in which it announced that it would assess options to further reducing the exhaust emission limits of recreational marine engines. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the impact assessment focuses on the following three areas of the revision having substantial impacts: A. Exhaust emission limits for engines Option 1 - No change (existing exhaust emissions are maintained). Option 2 - Stricter exhaust emission limits (Stage II): in the context of this option, the scenario harmonises the limits with the US for both: Spark ignition (SI) engines and compression ignition (CI) engines. Option 3 - Stricter exhaust emission limits (Stage II) combined with mitigating measures to limit negative economic/social effects: Sub-option 3.1 - Use of a flexibility scheme. Sub-option 3.2 - Use of a transitional period for all engine manufacturers (3 years). Sub-option 3.3 - Use of a transitional period for all engine manufacturers + a specific transitional period for small and medium sized engine manufacturers placing on the EU market the SI outboard engines < 15 kW (3+3 years). This last sub-option was selected in the impact assessment as the preferable option. B. Noise emission limits for watercrafts with propulsion engines. Option 1 - No change (existing noise emission limits are maintained). Option 2 - Stricter noise emission limits. Option 1 (keeping the current limit values) was found to be the preferred option. C. Alignment of the RCD with the New Legislative Framework: the Commission is engaged to align the sectorial legislation to the new legislative framework, the impact assessment concentrated in analysing the impacts of the alignment only. These impacts should be mostly positive, since the horizontal provisions are clarifying certain issues which are subject to uncertainty for the moment. LEGAL BASIS: Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: the main elements of the proposed revision are as follows: Clarifying scope and concepts of the Directive: in the past, there have been debates about the content of the term "recreational craft" in the Directive which has been sometimes claimed to be an overall term covering both recreational craft and personal watercraft. This lack of clarity is now eliminated by introducing into the definitions a new overall concept "watercraft" which covers both recreational craft and personal watercraft. For reasons of consistency and clarification it is also specified that only personal watercraft intended for sports and leisure is included in the Directive, and not for instance personal watercraft intended for rescue and police services. General safety requirement: it is necessary to specify explicitly that that products covered by this Directive may only be placed on the market or put into service if they meet the general requirement imposing them to be without danger to the safety and health of persons, property or environment and only if they meet the essential requirements set out in Annex I. Exhaust emissions: new stricter limits are foreseen for the exhaust emission of Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Hydrocarbons (HC) and the Particulates (PT). For CI engines these limits are set applying the US EPA standards for marine diesel recreational engines (40 CFR Part 1042). For SI engines, the limits are set using the US EPA emission standards for new non-road SI engines, equipment and vessels (40 CFR Part 1045). A general three years transitional period for the industry is foreseen. In addition, as regards exhaust emission requirements, a supplementary 3 years is granted to SME engine manufacturers who place on the market the SI engines below 15 kW. Constructional requirements: a new requirement is foreseen to impose mandatory installation of holding tanks to watercraft fitted with toilets in order to contribute to the marine environmental protection. Post construction assessment and private importer: Directive 94/25/EC contains rules on the post construction assessment of recreational craft which is carried out by any natural or legal person established within the Community who places the product on the market in cases, where neither the manufacturer, nor his authorized representative fulfils the responsibilities for evaluating the conformity of products to the Directive. For consistency, it is appropriate to extent the scope of this procedure to cover not only recreational craft but also personal watercraft. For clarity, it must be specified by whom and in which situations exactly this procedure can be used. These are:
As regards importing recreational craft and personal watercraft, it should be noted that compared to Directive 94/25/EC, the use of Post construction assessments is restricted to cases of non commercial import by private importers. In order to ensure a reliable assessment of the conformity of the product by the notified body with regard to the post construction assessment, there is a need to widen the obligations of the person asking for the post construction assessment to provide documents to the notified body. It is foreseen that he has to provide all the documents necessary for the assessment of the conformity of the product. Affixing of the CE-marking:the CE marking must be affixed on the watercraft, engines and components. In case of components, where that are not possible or not warranted on account of the size or nature of that product, it can alternatively be affixed to the packaging and to the accompanying documents. Reporting: in order to enforce the monitoring and the efficiency of this Directive, a new obligation is foreseen for the Member States to send every 5 years a report on the application of the Directive to the Commission. Aligning the Recreational Craft Directive with the New Legislative Framework (NLF) and the applicable conformity assessment procedures: consequently to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 and of Decision 768/2008/EC, the Recreational Craft Directive has to be brought in line with the principles of New Legislative Framework. It means basically the inclusion of the chapters describing the obligations of economic operators, the competences of conformity assessment bodies and market surveillance authorities, new conformity assessment modules and the status of CE marking. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no budgetary implication for the Union budget. DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. |
|
| activities/0/docs/0/type | changed |
Old
Publication de la proposition législativeNew
Legislative proposal published |
|
| activities/0/docs/0/url | changed |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0456/COM_COM(2011)0456_FR.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0456/COM_COM(2011)0456_EN.pdf |
|
| activities/0/docs/1 | added |
|
|
| activities/0/type | changed |
Old
Publication de la proposition législativeNew
Legislative proposal |
|
| activities/1/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
|
| activities/1/committees | added |
|
|
| activities/1/type | changed |
Old
Annonce en plénière de la saisine de la commission, 1ère lecture/lecture uniqueNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
|
| activities/2 | added |
|
|
| activities/3 | added |
|
|
| activities/4 | added |
|
|
| activities/5/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
|
| activities/5/committees | added |
|
|
| activities/5/type | changed |
Old
Vote en commission, 1ère lecture/lecture uniqueNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
|
| activities/6/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
|
| activities/6/committees | added |
|
|
| activities/6/docs/0/text/0 | changed |
Old
La commission du marché intérieur et de la protection des consommateurs a adopté le rapport de Malcolm HARBOUR (ECR, UK) sur la proposition de directive du Parlement européen et du Conseil relative aux bateaux de plaisance et aux véhicules nautiques à moteur. La commission parlementaire recommande que la position du Parlement européen adoptée en première lecture suivant la procédure législative ordinaire modifie la proposition de la Commission comme suit : Champ dapplication de la directive : un amendement clarifie que les bateaux également utilisés pour laffrètement ou pour la formation à la navigation de plaisance sont couverts par la directive. Définitions : les députés ont introduit des adaptations aux définitions :
Échanges de bonnes pratiques : la Commission devrait faciliter les échanges de bonnes pratiques entre États membres et mettre en place un système adapté à ces échanges. Les députés estiment qu'un tel échange de vues permettrait d'éviter des mesures disproportionnées. Libre circulation : un amendement stipule que les États membres ne peuvent faire obstacle à la mise à disposition sur le marché ou à la mise en service de moteurs de propulsion, installés ou non dans des bateaux, qui sont conformes à la directive. Obligations des fabricants : lamendement clarifie que les fabricants doivent veiller à ce que le produit soit accompagné d'instructions et d'informations de sécurité fournies dans une ou des langue(s) aisément compréhensible(s) par les consommateurs et autres utilisateurs finals dans les États membres où ils mettent leurs produits sur le marché. Cette langue est déterminée par l'État membre concerné. Objection formelle à une norme harmonisée : une révision législative horizontale du système de normalisation de l'Union est actuellement en cours : la disposition générale proposée sur les objections aux normes y est couverte ; les députés proposent donc de supprimer cette disposition de la proposition de directive sectorielle. Maintien des règles en vigueur depuis 1994 : les députés souhaitent maintenir les contrôles existants exercés par les organismes notifiés sur les grands navires susceptibles de naviguer en haute mer. Modifications de lannexe I : les amendements introduits par les députés visent à :
Rapport : au plus tard 5 ans à compter de la date de transposition, et en tenant compte des éventuelles initiatives majeures sur le marché, la Commission devra soumettre un rapport sur la capacité technique de réduire les émissions des moteurs des bateaux de plaisance en prenant en considération le rapport coût-efficacité des technologies et la nécessité d'adopter des valeurs harmonisées à l'échelle mondiale pour ce secteur. Le rapport sera, le cas échéant, assorti d'une proposition législative en ce sens. Examen: dans les deux ans suivant la date de transposition, la Commission présentera un rapport sur l'impact des catégories de conception des bateaux énumérées à l'annexe I, qui reposent sur la résistance à la force du vent et à la hauteur des vagues, en tenant compte de l'évolution de la normalisation au niveau international. Ce rapport évaluera notamment si les catégories de conception des bateaux nécessitent des spécifications ou subdivisions supplémentaires, afin de fournir de meilleures informations aux consommateurs sur l'utilisation effective. Il comportera également une évaluation des conséquences pour les entreprises de fabrication de bateaux. Le cas échéant, il sera accompagné d'une proposition législative. New
The Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the report by Malcolm HARBOUR (ECR, UK) on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on recreational craft and personal watercraft. The parliamentary committee recommends that the European Parliaments position at first reading, following the ordinary legislative procedure, amends the Commission proposal as follows: Scope of application: an amendment clarifies thatwatercraft also used for charter or for recreational boating training shall also be covered by this Directive. Definitions: Members introduced changes to the definitions:
Exchanges of best practice: the Commission should facilitate the exchange of best practices between Member States by setting up an adequate system for such exchanges. Members take the view that such an exchange of views on best practices would help to avoid disproportionate measures. Free movement: an amendment stipulates that the Member States shall not impede the making available on the market or putting into service of propulsion engines, whether or not installed in watercraft, which comply with this Directive. Manufacturers obligations: an amendment clarifies that manufacturers must ensure that their product is accompanied by instructions and safety information provided in a language or languages easily understood by consumers and other end-users in the Member States in which they place their products on the market. That language shall be determined by the Member State concerned. Objections to a harmonised standard: a horizontal legislative revision of the EU standardisation system is currently underway which covers this general provision on objections to standards; Members propose the deletion of this article in this proposal for a sectoral Directive. Restoration of the rules in force since 1994: Members wish to maintain the existing testing by notified bodies on large craft over 12m likely to sail in the open sea. Changes to Annex I: Members amendments seek to:
Report: no later than five years after the date of transposition, and and taking into account any major market initiatives, the Commission shall submit a report on the technical feasibility of further reducing the emissions of recreational marine engines, taking into account the cost-efficiency of technologies and the need to agree globally harmonised values for the sector. The report shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal to that effect. Review: in the two years following the date of transposition, the Commission shall present a report on the impact of the boat design categories listed in Annex I, which are based on resistance to wind force and wave height, taking into account developments in international standardisation. That report shall include an evaluation of whether the boat design categories require additional specifications or subdivisions, in order to provide better information on actual use for consumers. The report shall also include an evaluation of the impact for the boat manufacturing industry. Where appropriate, it shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal. |
|
| activities/6/docs/0/type | changed |
Old
Dépôt du rapport de la commission, 1ère lecture/lecture uniqueNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading |
|
| activities/6/docs/0/url | changed |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-213&language=FRNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-213&language=EN |
|
| activities/6/type | changed |
Old
Dépôt du rapport de la commission, 1ère lecture/lecture uniqueNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading |
|
| activities/7/body | changed |
Old
unknownNew
EP |
|
| activities/7/type | changed |
Old
Date indicative de la séance plénière, 1ère lecture/lecture uniqueNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
|
| committees/0 | added |
|
|
| committees/1 | added |
|
|
| committees/2 | added |
|
|
| links/Commission européenne | deleted |
|
|
| links/European Commission | added |
|
|
| links/National parliaments | added |
|
|
| links/Parlements nationaux | deleted |
|
|
| other/0 | added |
|
|
| procedure/Base juridique | deleted | Traité sur le fonctionnement de l'UE TFEU 114-p1 | |
| procedure/Consultation obligatoire d'autres institutions | deleted | Comité économique et social | |
| procedure/Dossier de la commission parlementaire | deleted | IMCO/7/06714 | |
| procedure/Etape de la procédure | deleted | En attente de la 1ère lecture du Parlement / lecture unique / 1ère phase du budget | |
| procedure/Instrument législatif | deleted | Directive | |
| procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions | added | Economic and Social Committee | |
| procedure/Référence de procédure | deleted | 2011/0197(COD) | |
| procedure/Sous-type de procédure | deleted | Législation | |
| procedure/Type de procédure | deleted | COD - Procédure législative ordinaire (ex-procedure codécision) | |
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee | added | IMCO/7/06714 | |
| procedure/instrument | added | Directive | |
| procedure/legal_basis | added |
|
|
| procedure/stage_reached | changed |
Old
En attente de la 1ère lecture du Parlement / lecture unique / 1ère phase du budgetNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
|
| procedure/subject | added |
|
|
| procedure/subtype | added | Legislation | |
| procedure/sujet | deleted |
|
|
| procedure/summary/0 | changed |
Old
Abrogation Directive 94/25/ECNew
Repealing Directive 94/25/EC |
|
| procedure/title | changed |
Old
Harmonisation des bateaux de plaisance et véhicules nautiques à moteurNew
Harmonisation of recreational crafts and personal watercrafts |
|
| procedure/type | changed |
Old
COD - Procédure législative ordinaire (ex-procedure codécision)New
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure) |
|


