PURPOSE: to make provisions for for legally valid electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.

BACKGROUND: the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) ensures official publication of the legislation and other acts of the EU. It has been published on paper since 1958 and, since 1998; it has also been available on the Internet. In recent years, an increasing number of people have been consulting the OJ on the Internet because it is convenient and quick, while the number of subscriptions for the printed edition has been declining. However, as the printed edition is currently considered to be the only valid and legally binding publication, for the time being legal rights cannot be claimed and obligations cannot be enforced based on the electronic version of the OJ. This was clearly stated by the Court of Justice of the EU in the Skoma-Lux case (Judgment of 11 December 2007 in Case C-161/06, Skoma-Lux sro v Celní ředitelství Olomouc). According to the Court, making the legislation available on the Internet does not equate to a valid publication in the Official Journal of the European Union in the absence of any rules in that regard in Community law.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: an analysis has been conducted by the Commission to assess three options with regard to publication of the OJ.

Option 1: maintaining the status quo, where only the paper version constitutes valid publication and the  online version of the Official Journal of the European

Union serves for information purposes only;

Option 2: exclusive online publication of the  Official Journal of the European Union;

Option 3: simultaneous publication on paper and online that would have equal legal value and effectiveness.

Providing for the legal value of the electronic edition will have significant benefits, as: 

• access to EU legislation is broadened, made easier and immediate; 
• access to the electronic edition is free of charge and possible at any time;
• such electronic publication would be in line  with the Digital Agenda priorities agreed among the EU institutions and would stimulate an increase in take-up of online services. 

LEGAL BASIS: Article 352 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

CONTENT: this proposal provides that electronic publication would equate to valid publication of the Official Journal of the European Union. It also deals with the technical requirements whereby electronic publication equates to valid publication and establishes the competences of the Publications Office in this area. 

However, the printed edition would suffice to ensure the legal effects of publication in technically-driven exceptional and temporary cases of unforeseen disruption of electronic publication (e.g. cyber-attacks, unforeseen equipment malfunctions) that last for more than one day. The edition of the OJ printed in such circumstances is to be published in electronic form as soon as the technical system is restored. The printed edition is to provide the date of publication, but the subsequent electronic edition would prevail in case of differences. 

The Commission notes that an electronic publication is consistent with the target set by the Europe 2020 Strategy and the flagship initiative A Digital

Agenda for Europe, according to which broadband access should be ensured for all by 2013.

The proposed system balances the concerns for both accessibility and simplicity: 

• the valid electronic publication allows for broader dissemination than the printed edition. During the last few years, there has been a drop in the number of subscriptions for the OJ, while Internet usage in the EU has been expanding - according to Eurostat, 70% of households in 2010 and 94% of enterprises in 2009 had access to Internet. Furthermore, consultation of the electronic edition of the OJ would be free of charge and would compare favourably with the printed publication, for which printing and shipping costs had to be levied from the public. Nonetheless, a safeguard is provided for people with disabilities who can access the OJ in a specific electronic format and for persons who cannot, for any other reason, access the electronic publication, as it will always be possible to obtain a paper version 'on demand' but without legal value (i.e. for information purposes only) either through the Publications Office or as a print-out from the Internet;
• the system is simpler since potentially complex rules on handling discrepancies between equally authentic printed and electronic editions are no longer required.

The proposal aims at broadening access to EU law and enabling everyone (be they professionals in law or members of the general public) to rely on the electronic edition of the OJ as being official and authentic. Should the electronic publication of the OJ be acknowledged as valid publication, all EU citizens could have virtually simultaneous access to EU law, immediately after publication and in a more economical manner since consultation of the electronic publication would be free of charge. Access for people living in geographically less accessible regions in Europe would also be facilitated.

The proposal also aims to enhance legal certainty compared to the current situation where the online publication serves for information purposes only, as rights could be enjoyed and obligations enforced based on their publication in the authentic electronic version of the OJ.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: providing for legally valid publication of the OJ in electronic form has no budgetary implication. 

However, the technical infrastructure supporting electronic publication requires IT-related investments. Under the administrative autonomy, expenditure of EUR 38 000 was incurred in 2009 for setting up and testing the technical system prior to the publication of the OJ in electronic form as authentic. Further development investments and the maintenance and system-running costs are to be borne by all institutions since the obligation to publish legislative texts rests with them. The method for calculation of the repartition key is based on the number of OJ L and C pages produced for each institution in year n-2. The key for 2011 has been set up on the basis of the 2009 figures: 

• European Commission: 47.64%;
• Council of the European Union: 21.96%;
• European Parliament: 21.94%;
• Economic and Social Committee: 3.29%;
• Court of Justice of the European Union: 3.17%;
• Court of Auditors: 1.25%;
• Committee of the Regions: 0.75%.

Budgetary provisions will be made in line with this repartition key.

PURPOSE: to give legal value to the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.

BACKGROUND: the printed edition of the Official Journal of the European Union, in all official languages of the Union, is at present the only legally binding publication, although it is also made available online.

If publication in the Official Journal of the European Union in electronic form were to constitute valid publication, faster and more economical access to Union law would be possible.

European citizens should have equal access to EU law and therefore access to the electronic edition of the Official Journal of the European Union should be ensured in the same manner and under the same conditions for all European citizens.

The Commission Communication on A Digital Agenda for Europe highlights that access to online legal content favours the development of a digital internal market, which leads to economic and social benefits.

LEGAL BASIS: Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). 

CONTENT: the draft Regulation aims to establish rules ensuring the authenticity, integrity and inalterability of the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The proposal provides that electronic publication would equate to valid publication of the Official Journal of the European Union. However, the printed edition would suffice to ensure the legal effects of publication in technically-driven exceptional and temporary cases of unforeseen disruption of electronic publication (e.g. cyber-attacks, unforeseen equipment malfunctions) that last for more than one day. The edition of the Official Journal of the European Union printed in such circumstances is to be published in electronic form as soon as the technical system is restored.

The electronic edition of the Official Journal shall bear an advanced electronic signature based on a qualified certificate and created with a secure-signature-creation device, in accordance with Directive 1999/93/EC. The qualified certificate and renewals thereof shall be published on the EUR-Lex web site in order to make it possible for the public to verify the advanced electronic signature and the authentic character of the electronic edition of the Official Journal.

The proposal provides that the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be made available to the public on the EUR-Lex web site for an unlimited period. No charge shall be made for its consultation.

The proposal guarantees that access to the EUR-Lex web site is to be ensured with respect to the commitments for the protection of persons with disabilities in accordance with Council Decision 2010/48/EC concerning the conclusion, by the European Community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

PURPOSE: to give legal value to the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.

BACKGROUND: the printed edition of the Official Journal of the European Union, in all official languages of the Union, is at present the only legally binding publication, although it is also made available online.

If publication in the Official Journal of the European Union in electronic form were to constitute valid publication, faster and more economical access to Union law would be possible.

European citizens should have equal access to EU law and therefore access to the electronic edition of the Official Journal of the European Union should be ensured in the same manner and under the same conditions for all European citizens.

The Commission Communication on A Digital Agenda for Europe highlights that access to online legal content favours the development of a digital internal market, which leads to economic and social benefits.

LEGAL BASIS: Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). 

CONTENT: the draft Regulation aims to establish rules ensuring the authenticity, integrity and inalterability of the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The proposal provides that electronic publication would equate to valid publication of the Official Journal of the European Union. However, the printed edition would suffice to ensure the legal effects of publication in technically-driven exceptional and temporary cases of unforeseen disruption of electronic publication (e.g. cyber-attacks, unforeseen equipment malfunctions) that last for more than one day. The edition of the Official Journal of the European Union printed in such circumstances is to be published in electronic form as soon as the technical system is restored.

The electronic edition of the Official Journal shall bear an advanced electronic signature based on a qualified certificate and created with a secure-signature-creation device, in accordance with Directive 1999/93/EC. The qualified certificate and renewals thereof shall be published on the EUR-Lex web site in order to make it possible for the public to verify the advanced electronic signature and the authentic character of the electronic edition of the Official Journal.

The proposal provides that the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be made available to the public on the EUR-Lex web site for an unlimited period. No charge shall be made for its consultation.

The proposal guarantees that access to the EUR-Lex web site is to be ensured with respect to the commitments for the protection of persons with disabilities in accordance with Council Decision 2010/48/EC concerning the conclusion, by the European Community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the report by Zbigniew ZIOBRO (ECR, PL) in which it recommends the European Parliament to give its consent to the draft Council regulation on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The proposal aims to enhance the legal certainty by broadening access to EU law and enabling everyone to rely on the electronic edition of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) as the official, authentic, up-to-date and complete version. The proposal therefore provides that electronic publication will equate to valid publication of the OJ. However, in exceptional and temporary cases of unforeseen disruption of the electronic publication only, the printed edition would have legal value.

The Council is reminded that that, should the requirement for unanimity under Article 352 TFEU and the pending domestic parliamentary procedures in the United Kingdom lead to any change in the draft text, the consent of the Parliament would have to be requested anew.

The European Parliament adopted by 596 votes to 6, with 18 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council regulation on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

Parliament gave its consent to the draft Council regulation. The Council is reminded that that, should the requirement for unanimity under Article 352 TFEU and the pending domestic parliamentary procedures in the United Kingdom lead to any change in the draft text, the consent of the Parliament would have to be requested anew.

PURPOSE: to make provisions for for legally valid electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.

BACKGROUND: the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) ensures official publication of the legislation and other acts of the EU. It has been published on paper since 1958 and, since 1998; it has also been available on the Internet. In recent years, an increasing number of people have been consulting the OJ on the Internet because it is convenient and quick, while the number of subscriptions for the printed edition has been declining. However, as the printed edition is currently considered to be the only valid and legally binding publication, for the time being legal rights cannot be claimed and obligations cannot be enforced based on the electronic version of the OJ. This was clearly stated by the Court of Justice of the EU in the Skoma-Lux case (Judgment of 11 December 2007 in Case C-161/06, Skoma-Lux sro v Celní ředitelství Olomouc). According to the Court, making the legislation available on the Internet does not equate to a valid publication in the Official Journal of the European Union in the absence of any rules in that regard in Community law.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: an analysis has been conducted by the Commission to assess three options with regard to publication of the OJ.

Option 1: maintaining the status quo, where only the paper version constitutes valid publication and the  online version of the Official Journal of the European

Union serves for information purposes only;

Option 2: exclusive online publication of the  Official Journal of the European Union;

Option 3: simultaneous publication on paper and online that would have equal legal value and effectiveness.

Providing for the legal value of the electronic edition will have significant benefits, as: 

• access to EU legislation is broadened, made easier and immediate; 
• access to the electronic edition is free of charge and possible at any time;
• such electronic publication would be in line  with the Digital Agenda priorities agreed among the EU institutions and would stimulate an increase in take-up of online services. 

LEGAL BASIS: Article 352 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

CONTENT: this proposal provides that electronic publication would equate to valid publication of the Official Journal of the European Union. It also deals with the technical requirements whereby electronic publication equates to valid publication and establishes the competences of the Publications Office in this area. 

However, the printed edition would suffice to ensure the legal effects of publication in technically-driven exceptional and temporary cases of unforeseen disruption of electronic publication (e.g. cyber-attacks, unforeseen equipment malfunctions) that last for more than one day. The edition of the OJ printed in such circumstances is to be published in electronic form as soon as the technical system is restored. The printed edition is to provide the date of publication, but the subsequent electronic edition would prevail in case of differences. 

The Commission notes that an electronic publication is consistent with the target set by the Europe 2020 Strategy and the flagship initiative A Digital

Agenda for Europe, according to which broadband access should be ensured for all by 2013.

The proposed system balances the concerns for both accessibility and simplicity: 

• the valid electronic publication allows for broader dissemination than the printed edition. During the last few years, there has been a drop in the number of subscriptions for the OJ, while Internet usage in the EU has been expanding - according to Eurostat, 70% of households in 2010 and 94% of enterprises in 2009 had access to Internet. Furthermore, consultation of the electronic edition of the OJ would be free of charge and would compare favourably with the printed publication, for which printing and shipping costs had to be levied from the public. Nonetheless, a safeguard is provided for people with disabilities who can access the OJ in a specific electronic format and for persons who cannot, for any other reason, access the electronic publication, as it will always be possible to obtain a paper version 'on demand' but without legal value (i.e. for information purposes only) either through the Publications Office or as a print-out from the Internet;
• the system is simpler since potentially complex rules on handling discrepancies between equally authentic printed and electronic editions are no longer required.

The proposal aims at broadening access to EU law and enabling everyone (be they professionals in law or members of the general public) to rely on the electronic edition of the OJ as being official and authentic. Should the electronic publication of the OJ be acknowledged as valid publication, all EU citizens could have virtually simultaneous access to EU law, immediately after publication and in a more economical manner since consultation of the electronic publication would be free of charge. Access for people living in geographically less accessible regions in Europe would also be facilitated.

The proposal also aims to enhance legal certainty compared to the current situation where the online publication serves for information purposes only, as rights could be enjoyed and obligations enforced based on their publication in the authentic electronic version of the OJ.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: providing for legally valid publication of the OJ in electronic form has no budgetary implication. 

However, the technical infrastructure supporting electronic publication requires IT-related investments. Under the administrative autonomy, expenditure of EUR 38 000 was incurred in 2009 for setting up and testing the technical system prior to the publication of the OJ in electronic form as authentic. Further development investments and the maintenance and system-running costs are to be borne by all institutions since the obligation to publish legislative texts rests with them. The method for calculation of the repartition key is based on the number of OJ L and C pages produced for each institution in year n-2. The key for 2011 has been set up on the basis of the 2009 figures: 

• European Commission: 47.64%;
• Council of the European Union: 21.96%;
• European Parliament: 21.94%;
• Economic and Social Committee: 3.29%;
• Court of Justice of the European Union: 3.17%;
• Court of Auditors: 1.25%;
• Committee of the Regions: 0.75%.

Budgetary provisions will be made in line with this repartition key.

The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the report by Zbigniew ZIOBRO (ECR, PL) in which it recommends the European Parliament to give its consent to the draft Council regulation on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The proposal aims to enhance the legal certainty by broadening access to EU law and enabling everyone to rely on the electronic edition of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) as the official, authentic, up-to-date and complete version. The proposal therefore provides that electronic publication will equate to valid publication of the OJ. However, in exceptional and temporary cases of unforeseen disruption of the electronic publication only, the printed edition would have legal value.

The Council is reminded that that, should the requirement for unanimity under Article 352 TFEU and the pending domestic parliamentary procedures in the United Kingdom lead to any change in the draft text, the consent of the Parliament would have to be requested anew.

The European Parliament adopted by 596 votes to 6, with 18 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council regulation on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

Parliament gave its consent to the draft Council regulation. The Council is reminded that that, should the requirement for unanimity under Article 352 TFEU and the pending domestic parliamentary procedures in the United Kingdom lead to any change in the draft text, the consent of the Parliament would have to be requested anew.

OBJECTIF : donner une valeur légale à l'édition électronique du Journal officiel de l'Union européenne.

ACTE PROPOSÉ : Règlement du Conseil.

CONTEXTE : bien que le Journal officiel soit également disponible en ligne, son édition imprimée, disponible dans toutes les langues officielles des institutions de l'Union, est actuellement la seule forme de publication juridiquement contraignante.

Si la publication au Journal officiel sous forme électronique constituait une publication en bonne et due forme, il serait possible d'accéder plus rapidement et de façon plus économique au droit de l'Union. Les citoyens devraient toutefois continuer d'avoir la possibilité d'obtenir une version imprimée du Journal officiel auprès de l'Office des publications.

La communication de la Commission intitulée « Une stratégie numérique pour l'Europe » souligne que l'accès aux contenus juridiques en ligne favorise le développement d'un marché intérieur numérique, ce qui procure des avantages économiques et sociaux.

BASE JURIDIQUE : article 352 du traité sur le fonctionnement de l'Union européenne (TFUE).

CONTENU : le présent projet de règlement vise à établir des règles assurant l'authenticité, l'intégrité et l'inaltérabilité de la publication électronique du Journal officiel.

Le règlement proposé fixe également les règles applicables aux cas ou, en raison de circonstances imprévues et exceptionnelles, il n'est pas possible de publier et de mettre à disposition l'édition électronique du Journal officiel.

L'édition électronique du Journal officiel devra être revêtue d'une signature électronique avancée, basée sur un certificat qualifié et créée par un dispositif sécurisé de création de signature, conformément à la directive 1999/93/CE. Le certificat qualifié et ses renouvellements seront publiés sur le site Internet EUR-Lex afin de permettre au public de vérifier la signature électronique avancée et l'authenticité de l'édition électronique du Journal officiel.

La proposition prévoit que l’édition électronique du Journal officiel doit être mise à la disposition du public sur le site Internet EUR-Lex dans un format non obsolète et pendant une période illimitée. Sa consultation devra être gratuite.

La proposition garantit l'accès au site Internet EUR-Lex conformément aux engagements relatifs à la protection des personnes handicapées, conformément à la décision 2010/48/CE du Conseil concernant la conclusion, par la Communauté européenne, de la convention des Nations unies relative aux droits des personnes handicapées. 

La commission des affaires juridiques a adopté le rapport de Zbigniew ZIOBRO (ECR, PL) sur le projet de règlement du Conseil relatif à la publication électronique du Journal officiel de l'Union européenne.

La commission parlementaire recommande que le Parlement européen donne son approbation au projet de règlement du Conseil.

La proposition à l'examen vise à renforcer la sécurité juridique en élargissant l'accès à la législation de l'Union et en permettant à tout un chacun d'utiliser l'édition électronique du Journal officiel de l'Union européenne (Journal officiel) comme étant sa version officielle, authentique, à jour et complète. La proposition prévoit dès lors que la publication électronique équivaudra à une publication en bonne et due forme du Journal officiel. Toutefois, l'édition imprimée conserverait sa valeur juridique en cas d'interruption exceptionnelle, temporaire et imprévue de la publication électronique.

Il est rappelé au Conseil que, si l'obligation de statuer à l'unanimité, conformément à l'article 352 du TFUE, et si les procédures parlementaires nationales en cours au Royaume-Uni devaient aboutir à une quelconque modification du projet de texte, l'approbation du Parlement européen devra être sollicitée à nouveau. 

PURPOSE: to make provisions for for legally valid electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.

BACKGROUND: the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) ensures official publication of the legislation and other acts of the EU. It has been published on paper since 1958 and, since 1998; it has also been available on the Internet. In recent years, an increasing number of people have been consulting the OJ on the Internet because it is convenient and quick, while the number of subscriptions for the printed edition has been declining. However, as the printed edition is currently considered to be the only valid and legally binding publication, for the time being legal rights cannot be claimed and obligations cannot be enforced based on the electronic version of the OJ. This was clearly stated by the Court of Justice of the EU in the Skoma-Lux case (Judgment of 11 December 2007 in Case C-161/06, Skoma-Lux sro v Celní ředitelství Olomouc). According to the Court, making the legislation available on the Internet does not equate to a valid publication in the Official Journal of the European Union in the absence of any rules in that regard in Community law.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: an analysis has been conducted by the Commission to assess three options with regard to publication of the OJ.

Option 1: maintaining the status quo, where only the paper version constitutes valid publication and the  online version of the Official Journal of the European

Union serves for information purposes only;

Option 2: exclusive online publication of the  Official Journal of the European Union;

Option 3: simultaneous publication on paper and online that would have equal legal value and effectiveness.

Providing for the legal value of the electronic edition will have significant benefits, as: 

• access to EU legislation is broadened, made easier and immediate; 
• access to the electronic edition is free of charge and possible at any time;
• such electronic publication would be in line  with the Digital Agenda priorities agreed among the EU institutions and would stimulate an increase in take-up of online services. 

LEGAL BASIS: Article 352 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

CONTENT: this proposal provides that electronic publication would equate to valid publication of the Official Journal of the European Union. It also deals with the technical requirements whereby electronic publication equates to valid publication and establishes the competences of the Publications Office in this area. 

However, the printed edition would suffice to ensure the legal effects of publication in technically-driven exceptional and temporary cases of unforeseen disruption of electronic publication (e.g. cyber-attacks, unforeseen equipment malfunctions) that last for more than one day. The edition of the OJ printed in such circumstances is to be published in electronic form as soon as the technical system is restored. The printed edition is to provide the date of publication, but the subsequent electronic edition would prevail in case of differences. 

The Commission notes that an electronic publication is consistent with the target set by the Europe 2020 Strategy and the flagship initiative A Digital

Agenda for Europe, according to which broadband access should be ensured for all by 2013.

The proposed system balances the concerns for both accessibility and simplicity: 

• the valid electronic publication allows for broader dissemination than the printed edition. During the last few years, there has been a drop in the number of subscriptions for the OJ, while Internet usage in the EU has been expanding - according to Eurostat, 70% of households in 2010 and 94% of enterprises in 2009 had access to Internet. Furthermore, consultation of the electronic edition of the OJ would be free of charge and would compare favourably with the printed publication, for which printing and shipping costs had to be levied from the public. Nonetheless, a safeguard is provided for people with disabilities who can access the OJ in a specific electronic format and for persons who cannot, for any other reason, access the electronic publication, as it will always be possible to obtain a paper version 'on demand' but without legal value (i.e. for information purposes only) either through the Publications Office or as a print-out from the Internet;
• the system is simpler since potentially complex rules on handling discrepancies between equally authentic printed and electronic editions are no longer required.

The proposal aims at broadening access to EU law and enabling everyone (be they professionals in law or members of the general public) to rely on the electronic edition of the OJ as being official and authentic. Should the electronic publication of the OJ be acknowledged as valid publication, all EU citizens could have virtually simultaneous access to EU law, immediately after publication and in a more economical manner since consultation of the electronic publication would be free of charge. Access for people living in geographically less accessible regions in Europe would also be facilitated.

The proposal also aims to enhance legal certainty compared to the current situation where the online publication serves for information purposes only, as rights could be enjoyed and obligations enforced based on their publication in the authentic electronic version of the OJ.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: providing for legally valid publication of the OJ in electronic form has no budgetary implication. 

However, the technical infrastructure supporting electronic publication requires IT-related investments. Under the administrative autonomy, expenditure of EUR 38 000 was incurred in 2009 for setting up and testing the technical system prior to the publication of the OJ in electronic form as authentic. Further development investments and the maintenance and system-running costs are to be borne by all institutions since the obligation to publish legislative texts rests with them. The method for calculation of the repartition key is based on the number of OJ L and C pages produced for each institution in year n-2. The key for 2011 has been set up on the basis of the 2009 figures: 

• European Commission: 47.64%;
• Council of the European Union: 21.96%;
• European Parliament: 21.94%;
• Economic and Social Committee: 3.29%;
• Court of Justice of the European Union: 3.17%;
• Court of Auditors: 1.25%;
• Committee of the Regions: 0.75%.

Budgetary provisions will be made in line with this repartition key.

The European Parliament adopted by 596 votes to 6, with 18 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council regulation on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union.

Parliament gave its consent to the draft Council regulation. The Council is reminded that that, should the requirement for unanimity under Article 352 TFEU and the pending domestic parliamentary procedures in the United Kingdom lead to any change in the draft text, the consent of the Parliament would have to be requested anew.

OBJECTIF : donner une valeur légale à l'édition électronique du Journal officiel de l'Union européenne.

ACTE PROPOSÉ : Règlement du Conseil.

CONTEXTE : bien que le Journal officiel soit également disponible en ligne, son édition imprimée, disponible dans toutes les langues officielles des institutions de l'Union, est actuellement la seule forme de publication juridiquement contraignante.

Si la publication au Journal officiel sous forme électronique constituait une publication en bonne et due forme, il serait possible d'accéder plus rapidement et de façon plus économique au droit de l'Union. Les citoyens devraient toutefois continuer d'avoir la possibilité d'obtenir une version imprimée du Journal officiel auprès de l'Office des publications.

La communication de la Commission intitulée « Une stratégie numérique pour l'Europe » souligne que l'accès aux contenus juridiques en ligne favorise le développement d'un marché intérieur numérique, ce qui procure des avantages économiques et sociaux.

BASE JURIDIQUE : article 352 du traité sur le fonctionnement de l'Union européenne (TFUE).

CONTENU : le présent projet de règlement vise à établir des règles assurant l'authenticité, l'intégrité et l'inaltérabilité de la publication électronique du Journal officiel.

Le règlement proposé fixe également les règles applicables aux cas ou, en raison de circonstances imprévues et exceptionnelles, il n'est pas possible de publier et de mettre à disposition l'édition électronique du Journal officiel.

L'édition électronique du Journal officiel devra être revêtue d'une signature électronique avancée, basée sur un certificat qualifié et créée par un dispositif sécurisé de création de signature, conformément à la directive 1999/93/CE. Le certificat qualifié et ses renouvellements seront publiés sur le site Internet EUR-Lex afin de permettre au public de vérifier la signature électronique avancée et l'authenticité de l'édition électronique du Journal officiel.

La proposition prévoit que l’édition électronique du Journal officiel doit être mise à la disposition du public sur le site Internet EUR-Lex dans un format non obsolète et pendant une période illimitée. Sa consultation devra être gratuite.

La proposition garantit l'accès au site Internet EUR-Lex conformément aux engagements relatifs à la protection des personnes handicapées, conformément à la décision 2010/48/CE du Conseil concernant la conclusion, par la Communauté européenne, de la convention des Nations unies relative aux droits des personnes handicapées.