2008/0249(COD)
Dual-use items and technology: Community regime for the control of exports (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000)
| AFET | INTA | |
| Lead Rapporteur | LEICHTFRIED Jörg (S&D) | |
| Opinion Rapporteur(s) | BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (Verts/ALE) |
Legal basis: TFEU TFEU 207-p2
Procedure completed
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opinion | AFET | BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (Verts/ALE) | |
| Lead | INTA | LEICHTFRIED Jörg (S&D) | CASPARY Daniel (EPP), RINALDI Niccolò (ALDE), CZARNECKI Ryszard (ECR), HIGGINS Joe (GUE/NGL) |
Legal Basis TFEU TFEU 207-p2
Activites
- 2011/12/08 Final act published in Official Journal
-
2011/11/16
Final act signed
-
2011/11/16
End of procedure in Parliament
-
2011/10/27
Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
- #3121
-
2011/10/27
Council Meeting
-
2011/09/29
CSL Final Agreement
-
2011/09/27
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
T7-0406/2011
summary
The European Parliament adopted by 567 votes to 89, with 12 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports of dual-use items and technology. The report had been sent back to the committee during the plenary session held on 5 April 2011. Parliament adopted its position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise negotiated between the European Parliament and the Council. They amend the Commission proposal as follows: Title of the Regulation: Parliament suggests the title is changed to Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual use items (recast). In a recital, it is recalled that on 5 May 2009, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (recast). Accordingly, Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 has been repealed with effect from 27 August 2009. The relevant provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 continue to apply only for export authorisation applications made before 27 August 2009. Objective: the amended Regulation states that it is desirable to achieve uniform and consistent application of controls throughout the Union in order to avoid unfair competition among Union exporters, harmonise the scope of Union General Export Authorisations and conditions of their use among Union exporters and ensure efficiency and effectiveness of the security controls in the Union. Prohibition to use authorisations:the amended text stipulates that the competent authorities of the Member State where the exporter is established can prohibit the exporter from using these authorisations if there is reasonable suspicion about his ability to comply with an authorisation or with a provision of the export control legislation. The competent authorities of the Member States shall exchange information on exporters deprived of the right to use a Union General Export Authorisation, unless they determine that the exporter will not attempt to export dual use items through another Member State. Export of dual-use items to countries subject to an arms embargo: the amended text Regulation states that an authorisation shall also be required for the export of dual-use items not listed in Annex I if the purchasing country or country of destination is subject to an arms embargo decided by a decision or a common position adopted by the Council or a decision of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) or to an arms embargo imposed by a binding resolution of the Security Council of the United Nations and if the exporter has been informed by the authorities that the items in question are or may be intended, in their entirety or in part, for a military end-use. Exchange of information: A secure and encrypted system for the exchange of information between Member States and, whenever appropriate, the Commission shall be set up by the Commission, in consultation with the Dual-Use Coordination Group. The European Parliament shall be informed about the system's budget, development, provisional and final set-up and functioning, and network costs. Annual report: the Commission shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament on the activities, examinations and consultations of the Dual-Use Coordination Group, which shall be subject to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. Information and the implementation of the Regulation: each Member State shall inform the Commission of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions adopted in implementation of this Regulation. The Commission shall forward the information to the other Member States. Every three years the Commission shall review the implementation of this Regulation and present a comprehensive implementation and impact assessment report to the European Parliament and the Council on its application, which may include proposals for its amendment. Member States shall provide to the Commission all appropriate information for the preparation of the report. In addition, no later than 31 December 2013, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report evaluating the implementation of this Regulation with a specific focus on the implementation of Annex IIb, Union General Export Authorisation No EU002, accompanied by, if appropriate, a legislative proposal to amend this Regulation, in particular as regards the issue of low-value shipments. Mutual recognition agreements: the Council may authorise the Commission to negotiate with third countries agreements providing for the mutual recognition of export controls of dual-use items covered by this Regulation and in particular to eliminate authorisation requirements for re-exports within the territory of the Union. Annexes: Parliament also introduced the following amendments to the annexes: any exporter who uses this authorisation must notify the competent authorities of the Member State where he is established of the first use of this authorisation no later than 30 days after the date when the first export takes place or, alternatively, and in accordance with a requirement by the authority of the Member State where the exporter is established, prior to the first use of this general export authorisation; introduce safeguards for the temporary export authorisation for exhibition or fair; prohibit the granting of general authorisations from the EU for exports to certain countries (South Africa, Argentina, China, South Korea, Croatia, India, Russia, Turkey, Ukraine) of telecommunications technologies for use in connection with a violation of human rights, democratic principles or freedom of speech as defined by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, by using interception technologies and digital data transfer devices for monitoring mobile phones and text messages and targeted surveillance of internet use (e.g. via Monitoring Centres and Lawful Interception Gateways); specify the list of chemicals covered by the Union general export authorisation No.006.
- Results of vote in Parliament
-
T7-0406/2011
summary
-
2011/09/27
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
- SP(2011)8584
- DG Trade, DE GUCHT Karel
-
2011/04/05
Text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading
-
T7-0125/2011
summary
The European Parliament amended, under the ordinary legislative procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports of dual-use items and technology. The vote on the legislative resolution was postponed to a later plenary session. The main amendments made to the Commission's proposal are as follows: Title of the Regulation: Parliament suggests the title is changed to Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual use items (recast). This amendment specifies that the three institutions agree to amend the last version of the regulation establishing the Community regime. It is recalled that on 17 December 2008, the Commission presented to the Council a proposal to amend Regulation No 1334/2000. This was replaced by a new Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (recast) which entered into force on 27 August 2009. Accordingly, Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 was repealed with effect from 27 August 2009. The relevant provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 continue to apply only for export authorisation applications made before 27 August 2009. Objective: an amended recital states that it is desirable to achieve uniform and consistent application of controls throughout the Union in order to avoid unfair competition among Union exporters, and harmonise the scope of general export authorisations and the conditions of their use. The latter objective was not part of the original proposal. Notifications: Members state that all notifications required under the terms of the Regulation will be made via secure electronic means including a secure system that shall be set up. A secure and encrypted system for the exchange of information among Member States and whenever appropriate the Commission shall be set up by the Commission, in consultation with the Dual-Use Coordination Group. The European Parliament shall be informed about the system's budget, development, provisional and final set-up and functioning, and network costs. This amendment seeks to oblige the Commission to set up a secure system for the collection, transmission, and storage of notifications. The system would be destined to have access on-line to a database containing e.g. the denials of export authorisations. Dual Use Coordination Group: the text stipulates that the Chair of the Dual-Use Coordination Group shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament on its activities, questions examined and consultations as well as a list of exporters, brokers and stakeholders that have been consulted. ' Review and reporting: every three years, the Commission shall review the implementation of this Regulation and present a comprehensive implementation and impact assessment report to the European Parliament and the Council on its application, which may include proposals for its amendment. Member States shall provide to the Commission all appropriate information for the preparation of the report. Special sections of the report shall deal with: i) the Dual-Use Coordination Group (its activities, questions examined and consultations, as well as a list of exporters, brokers and stakeholders who have been consulted); ii) the implementation of Article 19(4), and shall contain a report on the stage reached in the set-up of the secure and encrypted system for the exchange of information among Member States and the Commission; and iii) penalties, including criminal penalties for serious infringements of the provisions of the Regulation, such as intentional exports intended for use in a programme for the development or manufacture of chemical, biological, nuclear weapons or of missiles capable of their delivery without the authorisation required under this Regulation, or the falsification or omission of information with a view to obtaining an authorisation that would otherwise have been denied. The European Parliament or the Council may invite the Commission to an ad hoc meeting of the competent committee of Parliament or of the Council to present and explain any issues related to the application of this Regulation. International cooperation: the Commission may negotiate with third countries agreements providing for the mutual recognition of export controls of dual-use items covered by the Regulation, in particular to eliminate authorisation requirements for re-exports within the territory of the Union. When appropriate and when projects financed by the Union are at stake, the Commission can make proposals, in the relevant legislative frameworks of the Union or in the arrangements with third countries, so that an ad hoc committee involving all competent authorities of the Member States can be set up and be entitled to decide on the granting of the necessary export authorisations to ensure the proper functioning of those projects involving dual-use items or technologies. Low-value shipments: a "low-value shipment" means items which are comprised in a single export contract and are dispatched by an exporter to a named consignee in one or more consignments the aggregate value of which does not exceed EUR 3 000 (compared to EUR 5 000 in the proposal). This amount should be reviewed each year, from 31 October 2112 onwards. If a transaction or act proves to be part of an integral economic operation, the value of the whole operation shall be considered when calculating the value of this authorisation. Additional costs such as packaging and transport costs may be excluded from the calculation of the value only under certain conditions. Amendments to the Annexes:Parliament also introduced the following amendments to the Regulation's annexes: specifiying that items should -only be exported towards countries that have been agreed consensually by the Member States; specifying that all exporters are required to inform the competent authorities of the Member State in which they are established of the first use of the authorisation no later than 30 days after the date of the first exportation or, in accordance with a requirement of the authority of the Member State where the exporter is established, before the first use of the general export authorisation. Each Member State may require exporters established on their territory to register themselves before the first use of the authorisation; introducing additional guarantees for the export authorisation; specifying that computers and related equipment are sensitive items and that they may not be covered by general EU export authorisations; specifying that general export authorisations should not be granted for items that can be used by governments or businesses to violate fundamental human rights.
-
T7-0125/2011
summary
-
2011/04/04
Debate in Parliament
- 2011/02/07 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
- 2011/01/26 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
2010/11/09
Prev Adopt in Cte
-
2010/10/15
Deadline Amendments
- 2010/08/23 Committee draft report
- 2010/03/11 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2010/03/01
EP officialisation
-
2009/12/02
Additional information
-
2008/12/16
Legislative proposal
-
COM(2008)0854
summary
PURPOSE: to achieve uniform and consistent application of controls of exports of dual-use items and technology throughout the Community in order to avoid unfair competition among Community exporters and ensure efficiency of the security controls in the Community. PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation. BACKGROUND: Council Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports of dual-use items and technology requires dual-use items (including software and technology) to be subject to effective control when they are exported from the Community. Dual-use items (including software and technology) are civil items which can be used for military purposes. They are subject to control when they are to be exported from the European Union. These controls are designed in particular to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. To ensure that such control is fully effective and complies with Member States' commitments at multilateral level, authorisation is required under Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 for export of the dual-use items listed in Annex I. There are four types of export authorisations: 1) Community General Export Authorisation (CGEA) No EU001, as referred to in Article 6 of Regulation 1334/2000, covers most of the exports of controlled items to seven countries (United States of America, Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland and Norway); 2) for all other exports for which an authorisation is required under the Regulation, it leaves to the national authorities the final decision as to whether to grant a national general, global or individual export licence. National general export authorisations are created by individual EU Member States and are valid in principle across the EU. However, in spite of the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000, there is a lack of transparency across Member States regarding both the scope and conditions of use of national general export authorisations and the list of exporters denied access to national general export authorisations. As a result, the chances of infringement of the Regulation are significant. This leads to regulatory treatment of certain exports that benefits businesses established in one Member State at least partly at the expense of businesses established in and national security interests of other Member States, and is not in the best interests of the Community as a whole. In its Communication of 18 December 2006, the Commission put forward the idea of the creation of new Community General Export Authorisations in a bid to simplify the current legal system, enhance the industry's competitiveness and establish a level playing field for all Community exporters when they export certain items to certain destinations. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: this initiative does not create new administrative burdens for companies. The objective is to provide exporters with a more comprehensive instrument than national authorisations - valid throughout the European Union. Even if it impossible to measure the exact impact, it is clear that the initiative will have a positive operational impact on exporters, that there will be no negative impact at EU level and that this narrow legislative initiative would have no far-reaching economic, social or environmental impact beyond the dual-use goods regime. LEGAL BASIS: please refer to the summary entitled "background note". CONTENT: in order to create new Community General Export Authorisations for certain non-sensitive dual-use items to certain non-sensitive countries, the relevant provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 need to be amended by the addition of six new Annexes. The draft proposal covers six new CGEAs. Compared to the preferences expressed by the Working Party sub-group on new CGEAs, this proposal has added a number of countries and items and made a number of changes to the conditions of use of the authorisations. In addition, the draft Regulation states that the competent authorities of the Member State where the exporter is established should be provided with the possibility of not permitting the use of the Community General Export Authorisations foreseen in this Regulation where the exporter has been sanctioned of an export-related offence punishable by the withdrawal of the right to use these authorisations. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no implication on the EU budget.
- DG Trade, DE GUCHT Karel
-
COM(2008)0854
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2008)0854
- Committee draft report: PE443.007
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0028/2011
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0125/2011
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0406/2011
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)8584
- : Regulation 2011/1232
- : OJ L 326 08.12.2011, p. 0026
Votes
A7-0028/2011 - Jörg Leichtfried - Résolution législative
| Position | Total | ALDE | ECR | EFD | GUE/NGL | NI | PPE | S&D | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 567 | 82 | 47 | 16 | 0 | 12 | 243 | 167 | 0 | 0 |
| Against | 89 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 17 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 0 |
| Abstain | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A7-0028/2011 - Jörg Leichtfried - Legislative resolution
| Position | Total | ALDE | ECR | EFD | GUE/NGL | NI | PPE | S&D | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 567 | 82 | 47 | 16 | 0 | 12 | 243 | 167 | 0 | 0 |
| Against | 89 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 17 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 0 |
| Abstain | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amendments | Dossier |
| 31 |
2008/0249(COD) Dual-use items and technology: Community regime for the control of exports (amend. Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000)
2010/06/18
AFET
14 amendments...
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIb - Part 3 - paragraph 4 - subparagraph 1 1. inform the competent authorities of the Member State where he is established (as defined in Article 6(6)) of first use of the authorisation no later than 30 days after the date of first export. No second use of the authorisation may be granted until the conditions and stipulations pertaining to the 'low-value shipments' export authorisation have been verified by the relevant authorities;
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIb - Part 3 - paragraph 5 5. For the purposes of this authorisation, “a low-value shipment” means items which are comprised in a single export order and are dispatched by an exporter to a named consignee in one or more consignments the aggregate value of which does not exceed €
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIb - Part 3 - paragraph 5 5. For the purposes of this authorisation, “a low-value shipment” means items which are comprised in a single export order and are dispatched by an exporter to a named consignee in one or more consignments the aggregate value of which does not exceed €5 000. For this purpose, “value” means the price billed to the consignee; if there is no consignee or determinable price,
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIc - Part 2 - Countries of destination A
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIc - Part 3 - paragraph 2 - subparagraph 4 4. for an essentially identical transaction where the initial authorisation has been annulled, suspended or revoked.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIc - Part 3 - paragraph 4 4. Any exporter who uses this general authorisation must notify the competent authorities of the Member State where he is established (as defined in Article 6(6))
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIc - Part 2 - Countries of destination A
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IId - part 3 - paragraph 3 3. Any exporter who uses this general authorisation must notify the competent authorities of the Member State where he is established (as defined in Article 6(6)) and the Commission of the first use of this authorisation
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIf - Part 1 - paragraph 3 and 4 Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIf - Part 2 - countries of destination Argentina China Croatia Russia South Africa South Korea Turkey Ukraine
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIf - Part 3 - paragraph 1 - subparagraph 1 - point c a (new) (ca) for use in connection with a violation of human rights, democratic principles or freedom of speech by using interception technologies and digital data transfer devices for monitoring mobile phones and text messages and targeted surveillance of internet use (e.g. via Monitoring Centres and Lawful Interception Gateways);
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIf - Part 3 - paragraph 3 - subparagraph 1 1
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIg - Part 2 - Countries of destinations Argentina
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIg - Part 3 - paragraph 4 - subparagraph 1 source: PE-443.041
2010/10/20
INTA
17 amendments...
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act - The European Parliament rejects the Commission's proposal
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 4 (4) In order to create new
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 5 a (new) (5a) In order to be in line with the Union´s stated commitment in the field of policy coherence for development, Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 ensures that exports (such as computers and related equipment) which serve the purpose of technology transfer in the interests of development will be included in the EU general export authorisations.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 5 b (new) (5b) In the interest of transparency, democracy and efficient implementation of Regulation (EC) No 428/2009, this Regulation should provide for a mechanism that gives stakeholders such as human rights and peace monitoring organisations and trade unions a say in the decision making process that leads to the updating of the countries of destination as well as the updating of goods identified as dual use items.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 2 c (new) Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Article 23 (2c) Article 23 is replaced by the following: Article 23 1. A Coordinating Group chaired by a representative of the Commission shall be set up. Each Member State shall appoint a representative to the Coordinating Group. It shall examine any question concerning the application of this Regulation which may be raised either by the chair or by a representative of a Member State. 2. The Chair of the Dual-Use Coordination Group or the Coordinating Group shall, whenever it considers it to be necessary, consult exporters, brokers and other relevant stakeholders concerned by this Regulation. 3. The Chair of the Dual-Use Coordination Group shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament on its activities.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIb Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 3 – paragraph 4 – point 1 (1) inform the competent authorities of the Member State where he is established (as defined in Article 6(6)) of first use of the authorisation no later than 30 working days after the date of first export;
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIb Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 3 – paragraph 5 Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIb Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 3 – paragraph 5 5. For the purpose
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIc Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 1 – Items 1-1) This
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIc Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 3 – paragraph 4 4. Any exporter who uses this authorisation must notify the competent authorities of the Member State where he is established (as defined in Article 6(6)) of first use of the authorisation no later than 30 days after the date when the first export takes place or, alternatively, and in accordance with a requirement by the authority of the Member State where the exporter is established, prior to the first use of this General Export Authorisation. Member States shall notify the Commission of the notification mechanism chosen for this General Export Authorisation. The Commission shall publish the information notified to it in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union. Reporting requirements attached to the use of this authorisation and additional information that the Member State from which the export is made may require on items exported under this authorisation are defined by Member States. A Member State may require the exporter established in that Member State to register prior to the first use of this authorisation. Registration shall be automatic and acknowledged by the competent authorities to the exporter without delay and in any case within 10 working days of receipt of the registration request. Where applicable the requirements set out in the second and third subparagraphs shall be based on those defined for the use of national general export authorisations granted by those Member States which provide for such authorisations.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IId Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 2 – Countries of destination Argentina, B
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IId Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 3 – paragraph 3 3. Any exporter who uses this authorisation must notify the competent authorities of the Member State where he is established (as defined in Article 6(6)) of the first use of th
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IId Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 3 – paragraph 4 4. For the purpose of this authorisation, "exhibition
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIf Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 2 – Countries of destination Argentina, C
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIf Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 3 – paragraph 3 – point 1 (1)
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIg Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 2 – Countries of destination Argentina
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Annex IIg Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 Part 3 – paragraph 4 – point 1 (1)
source: PE-450.923
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| activities | added |
|
|
| committees | added |
|
|
| links | added |
|
|
| other | added |
|
|
| procedure | added |
|
|


