2007/0196(COD)
Energy: rules for the internal market in natural gas (repeal. Directive 2003/55/EC). Third Energy Package
| ECON | ENVI | IMCO | ITRE | ITRE | |
| Lead Rapporteur | MUSSA Antonio (UEN) | LA RUSSA Romano Maria (UEN) | |||
| Opinion Rapporteur(s) | RAPKAY Bernhard (PSE) | MANDERS Toine (ALDE) |
Legal basis: EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 047-p2 , EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 055 , EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 095
Procedure completed
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opinion | ECON | RAPKAY Bernhard (PSE) | |
| Opinion | ENVI | ||
| Opinion | IMCO | MANDERS Toine (ALDE) | |
| Lead | ITRE | MUSSA Antonio (UEN) | |
| Lead | ITRE | LA RUSSA Romano Maria (UEN) |
Legal Basis EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 047-p2, EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 055, EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 095
Activites
- 2009/08/14 Final act published in Official Journal
-
2009/07/13
Final act signed
-
2009/07/09
End of procedure in Parliament
-
2009/06/25
Act approved by Council, 2nd reading
- #2953
-
2009/06/25
Council Meeting
-
2009/06/23
Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading
-
COM(2009)0316
summary
At its Plenary Session of 22 April 2009, the European Parliament adopted a compromise package which had been agreed with the Council in view of reaching a second reading agreement. These amendments concern essentially: the limited strengthening of some rules ensuring effective unbundling of transmission system operator; reinforced independence and powers of national regulators; provisions creating stronger obligations for Member States as regards consumer protection, energy poverty and the implementation of smart metering. The Commission accepts the compromise package as it is in line with the overall purpose and the general characteristics of the proposal.
- DG Energy and Transport, PIEBALGS Andris
-
COM(2009)0316
summary
-
2009/04/29
CSL Final Agreement
-
2009/04/22
Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading
-
T6-0244/2009
summary
The European Parliament adopted with amendments, under the second reading of the codecision procedure, the Council's common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC. The amendments are the result of a compromise negotiated with the Council on the package of energy market legislation. The compromise gives Member States the possibility to choose between three options for separating supply and production activities from network operations - both for gas and electricity markets: full ownership unbundling; the independent system operator (ISO); the independent transmission operator (ITO). MEPs obtained in the compromise a strengthening of energy consumers' rights. The main amendments are as follows: Public service obligations and customer protection: Member States shall ensure that all customers connected to the gas network are entitled to have their gas provided by a supplier, subject to the supplier's agreement, regardless of the Member State in which the supplier is registered, as long as the supplier follows the applicable trading and balancing rules and subject to security of supply requirements. In this regard, Member States shall take all measures to ensure that administrative procedures do not constitute a barrier for supply undertakings already registered in another Member State. Member States shall also ensure that: (i) where a customer, while respecting contractual conditions, wishes to change supplier, the change is effected by the operator(s) concerned within three weeks; (ii) customers are entitled to receive all relevant consumption data. Member States shall ensure that these rights are granted to all customers in a non-discriminatory way as regards cost, effort or time. The contracts concluded with their gas provider shall provide information on consumer rights, including on the complaint handling and all of the above, clearly communicated through billing or natural gas undertakings' web sites. Checklist: the Commission should establish, after consulting relevant stakeholders including Member States, national regulatory authorities, consumer organisations and electricity undertakings, an accessible, user-friendly Energy Consumer Checklist providing consumers with practical information about their rights. That Energy Consumer Checklist should be provided to all consumers and be made publicly available. Single points of contact: Member States shall ensure: (i) the provision of single points of contact to provide consumers with all necessary information concerning their rights, current legislation and the means of dispute settlement available to them in the event of a dispute; (ii) that an independent mechanism such as an energy ombudsman or a consumer body is in place for an efficient treatment of complaints and out-of-court dispute settlements. Vulnerable customers: each Member State shall define the concept of vulnerable customers which may refer to energy poverty and, inter alia, to the prohibition of disconnection of such customers in critical times. Member States shall ensure that rights and obligations linked to vulnerable customers are applied. In particular, they shall take appropriate measures to protect final customers in remote areas who are connected to the gas system. They may appoint a supplier of last resort for customers connected to the gas network. Addressing energy poverty: Member States shall take appropriate measures, such as National Energy Action Plans or benefits in social security systems for ensuring the necessary energy supply to vulnerable customers or support for energy efficiency improvements, to address energy poverty where identified, including in the broader context of poverty. Such measures shall not impede the effective opening of the market and market functioning. Promoting energy efficiency: Member States or the regulatory authority shall strongly recommend that electricity undertakings optimise the use of electricity, for example by providing energy management services, developing innovative pricing formulas, or introducing intelligent metering systems or smart grids where appropriate. Intelligent metering systems: Member States shall ensure the implementation of intelligent metering systems that shall assist the active participation of consumers in the gas supply market. The implementation of those metering systems may be subject to an economic assessment of all the long-term costs and benefits to the market and the individual consumer or which form of intelligent metering is economically reasonable and cost-effective and which timeframe is feasible for their distribution. Such assessment shall take place within three years of the entry into force of this Directive. Subject to this assessment, Member States or any competent authority they designate, shall prepare a timetable for the implementation of intelligent metering systems. Promotion of regional cooperation: Member States as well as the regulatory authorities shall cooperate among themselves for the purpose of integrating their national markets at one and more regional levels, as a first step towards a fully liberalised internal market. Member States shall also facilitate integration of the isolated systems forming gas islands that persist in the European Union. Tasks of transmission, storage and/or LNG system operators: each transmission, storage and/or LNG system operator shall operate, maintain and develop under economic conditions secure, reliable and efficient transmission, storage and/or LNG facilities to secure an open market, with due regard to the environment, ensure adequate means to meet service obligations. Each transmission system operator shall build sufficient cross-border capacity to integrate European transmission infrastructure accommodating all economically reasonable and technically feasible demands for capacity and taking into account security of gas supply. Tasks of distribution system operators: each distribution system operator shall be responsible for ensuring the long-term ability of the system to meet reasonable demands for the distribution of gas, and for operating, maintaining and developing under economic conditions a secure, reliable and efficient system in its area, with due regard for the environment and energy efficiency. Closed distribution systems: the text provides that where a closed distribution system is used or a closed distribution system is maintained primarily for the use of the owner of the system, it should be possible to exempt the distribution system operator from obligations which would constitute an unnecessary administrative burden because of the particular nature of the relationship between the distribution system operator and the users of the system. Industrial, commercial or shared services sites such as train station buildings, airports, hospitals, large camping sites with integrated facilities or chemical industry sites can include closed distribution systems because of the specialised nature of their operations. General objectives of the regulatory authority: the regulatory authority shall take all reasonable measures in pursuit of the objectives and ensure appropriate conditions for the effective and reliable operation of gas networks, taking into account long-term objectives. Duties and powers of the regulatory authority: the regulatory authority shall have the following duties: (i) fixing or approving, in accordance with transparent criteria, regulated transmission or distribution tariffs or their methodologies; (ii) monitoring the occurrence of restrictive contractual practices, including exclusivity clauses; (iii) respecting contractual freedom with regard to interruptible supply contracts as well as with regard to long term contracts provided that they are compatible with Community law and consistent with EU policies; (iv) helping to ensure, together with other relevant authorities, that the consumer protection measures are effective and enforced; (v) contributing to the compatibility of data exchange processes for the most important market processes at regional level. Congestion management: the regulatory authorities shall monitor congestion management of national electricity systems including interconnectors, and the implementation of congestion management rules. To that effect, transmission system operators or market operators shall submit their congestion management rules, including capacity allocation, to the national regulatory authorities. National regulatory authorities may request amendments to these rules. Regulatory authorities shall cooperate at least at a regional level to coordinate the development of all network codes for the relevant transmission system operators and other market actors and coordinate the development of the rules governing the management of congestion. National regulatory authorities shall also have the right to enter into co-operative arrangements with each other to foster regulatory cooperation. Report: the Commission shall, no later than 1 January 2006, forward to the European Parliament and Council, a detailed report outlining progress in creating the internal market in natural gas. In that report, the Commission, in consultation with the ENTSO for Gas, may also consider the feasibility of the creation, by transmission system operators, of a single European transmission system operator. In the recitals, the following points are highlighted: any system for unbundling should be effective in removing any conflict of interests between producers, suppliers and transmission system operators, in order to create incentives for the necessary investments and guarantee the access of new market entrants under a transparent and efficient regulatory regime and should not create an overly onerous regulatory regime for national regulatory authorities; in order to develop competition in the internal market for gas, large non-household customers should be able to choose their suppliers as well as enter into contracts to secure their gas requirements with several suppliers; Member States should take concrete measures to assist the wider use of biogas and gas from biomass, the producers of which must be granted non-discriminatory access to the gas system, provided that such access is compatible with the relevant technical rules and safety standards on an ongoing basis; any harmonisation of the powers of national regulatory authorities should include the powers to provide for incentives that may be offered and the powers to issue effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties that may be imposed on natural gas undertakings or to propose to a court to impose such penalties. Moreover, regulatory authorities should have the power to request relevant information from natural gas undertakings, make appropriate and sufficient investigations and settle disputes; the public service requirements should be defined at national level, taking into account national circumstances. Community law should, however, be respected by the Member States. The citizens of the European Union and, where Member States deem it appropriate, small enterprises, should be able to enjoy public service obligations, in particular with regard to security of supply and reasonable tariffs. to secure common rules for a truly European internal market and a broad supply of gas should also be one of the main goals of this Directive. To this end, undistorted market prices would provide an incentive for cross-border interconnections while leading, in the long term, to price convergence.
- Results of vote in Parliament
-
T6-0244/2009
summary
-
2009/04/22
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
- SP(2009)3507
- DG Energy and Transport, PIEBALGS Andris
-
2009/04/21
Debate in Parliament
- 2009/04/03 Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
- 2009/03/31 Vote in committee, 2nd reading
- 2009/03/11 Committee draft report
-
2009/03/05
Deadline Amendments
- 2009/01/15 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
-
2009/01/12
Commission communication on Council's position
-
COM(2008)0907
summary
The common positions adopted by the Council on the five texts that make up the Third Package contain all the essential components of the Commission's proposal that are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the internal gas and electricity market. They can therefore be generally supported by the Commission. Concerning the Gas Directive, the Ownership Unbundling option and the Independent System Operator (ISO) option were adopted. The Commission continues to regard ownership unbundling as the best solution. In its common position, the Council has included a third option, the Independent Transmission Operator (ITO). The Commission can accept the ITO option as part of a general compromise provided that this option is not weaker than in the common position and contains the strongest possible features a political compromise will allow. The Commission recalls that the first reading focused on obtaining agreement within the Council. The amendments adopted by the European Parliament were therefore not formally incorporated into the common position. Negotiations to this end will take place during the second reading. Some amendments adopted by the European Parliament are however taken into account in the common position. These are amendments on: the definition of electricity undertakings; the definition of virtual power plants; the application of unbundling to public entities; monitoring of the implementation of safeguards measures; guidelines for public service obligations and power of regulatory authorities. The amendments partially covered by the common position are on: greater regional cooperation; the independence of national regulators and the duties of these national regulators; the methodology for approving tariffs. The Commission considers that a number of the amendments that are not covered should be taken into account in the second reading. These amendments are on the following points: Role of regulators: the Commission generally supports amendments that strengthen the role and independence of the national regulators. Long-term contracts are acceptable provided they comply with competition rules, but they will not be encouraged as they have a potential foreclosing effect on the market. The principles behind amendments relating to the promotion of energy efficiency can generally be supported. However, the specific amendment calling for a pure obligation to introduce pricing formulas which increase in the case of greater levels of consumption cannot be accepted. Consumer rights: the Commission generally supports amendments that increase consumer rights, in particular: the obligation on suppliers to set adequate prepayment bills; the cross-recognition of supply licences between Member States; the appointment of a single point of contact at national level to provide consumers with all the necessary information concerning their rights; and the appointment of an Ombudsman at national level. The proposal to roll out smart meters within a 10-year period can also in principle be supported although its precise scope and drafting would need to be carefully reviewed. However, the Commission cannot support amendments that aim to incorporate an Energy Consumers Charter into the Directive. The Commission supports the aim of amendments regarding the role of distribution system operators. However, the proposals need to be considered in further detail to ensure that they are practical and achievable. Fight against energy poverty: the Commission could support an obligation on Member States to define energy poverty within the confines of a definition of vulnerable consumers at national level, but does not support a definition of energy poverty at EC level. Furthermore, the Commission believes that an obligation at EC level to ensure that the number of people suffering from energy poverty decreases would be inappropriate. Nevertheless, it could: (i) support a general objective to reduce the number of people suffering from energy poverty; (ii) support an obligation on Member States to ensure specific protection of pensioners and disabled people in winter and to report to the Commission on the measures adopted in this regard. Access to Storage and LNG: amendments that underpin the access regime to storage can be supported, but not the deletion of legal and functional unbundling. Parliament's proposal to allow negotiated Third Party Access (TPA) for LNG cannot be accepted in its current form. Other issues: the Commission can accept amendments which underline the obligations of TSOs on congestion management, investment in new capacity and transparency. It can also support the requirement of greater cooperation between Transmission System Operators (TSOs) in the operation of their systems. Parliament wants to allow Member States to grant derogations to third-party access rules for industrial sites. The Commission supports in principle the derogation for industrial sites, which would also cover airports and railways. However, it considers that the amendment goes too far and outlines a solution consisting of a derogation limited to the most burdensome administrative obligations, i.e. ex ante tariff approval by regulators.
- DG Energy and Transport, PIEBALGS Andris
-
COM(2008)0907
summary
-
2009/01/09
Council position
-
14540/2/2008
summary
The Council unanimously adopted its common position in the form of a recast of Directive 2003/55/EC (the current legislative act will therefore be repealed). To the extent possible the Council has followed the Commission's approach regarding an identical treatment of the electricity and gas sectors. Concerning the 122 amendments adopted by the European Parliament at first reading, the Council has followed the Commission in accepting, in part or in full, 20 amendments, and in rejecting 44 other amendments. Regarding the European Parliament amendments where the Council has deviated from the Commission position, the Council accepted one amendment and rejected 59. The Council also introduced the following modifications to the Commission proposal: Effective separation of network operation from generation and supply activities: in addition to the two options proposed by the Commission (ownership unbundling (OU) and the Independent System Operator (ISO)), the Council, in agreement with the Commission, considered it appropriate to introduce a third option, the Independent Transmission Operator (ITO), in the case where a transmission system operator is part of a vertically integrated undertaking (VIU) at the entry into force of the Directive. The three options are on equal footing and will be available for both the electricity and the gas sector. The ITO-provisions will ensure the effective independence of the operator, its management and the supervisory body and that conflicts of interest are avoided. Moreover, undistorted investment incentives and the development of interconnection infrastructure, as well as fair and non-discriminatory network access, will be ensured. Additional powers and competences for the regulatory authorities have been added. In addition, a paragraph has been added regarding regional cooperation where ITOs are involved. Finally, the Commission will assess, as part of a general review, the implementation of the ITO option against certain criteria two years after the date of transposition of the Directive. Level playing field: given the future presence of three different unbundling models on the Community market, provisions establish a number of criteria for measures which Member States have the possibility to take in order to ensure a level playing field. Certification of Transmission System Operators (TSOs) of the Community and of third countries: the common position has a general Article on certification and one on certification in relation to third countries. This Article ensures on the one hand that TSOs of third countries have to respect the same unbundling rules as Community TSOs. On the other hand, it introduces the criterion of security of energy supply of the Member States and the Community which has to be taken into account when certification is granted. The main decision on certification will remain with the national regulatory authorities while the Commission is requested to give its opinion on the certification. National regulators must take utmost account of that opinion. Regulatory authorities: the common position ensures that the principle of a single regulator at national level combined with unique representation (e.g. at the Agency) is compatible with the current existence in some Member States of regulators at regional level or for small and isolated parts of the territory. While ensuring the independence of the regulatory authorities, the text of the common position also clarifies that this does not mean that regulators are free from judicial control or parliamentary supervision or can ignore broader objectives e.g. on environmental sustainability or on public service obligations. The common position also ensures that, when carrying out their duties, regulators have the possibility to act, where relevant, in close cooperation with other authorities, such as competition ones, while preserving their independence and without duplicating the tasks (e.g. monitoring) usually carried out by other authorities. Regulatory regime for cross-border issues: the provisions setting out the role of the Agency have, for legal reasons, been transferred to the Agency Regulation. The Agency will be involved in cross-border issues as a last resort, at the request of national regulators or if national regulators don't reach an agreement within a certain time frame. Derogations: the Council considered it appropriate to update the text, in particular regarding a derogation from the unbundling provisions for Member States with emergent or isolated markets. Minority shareholding: the Council considered it appropriate not to exclude minority shareholding of producer/supplier in ownership unbundled TSOs as long as this does not entail any control or any influence of one on the other and cannot lead to a conflict of interest. Public ownership: the common position contains the possibility to achieve ownership unbundling with two separate public bodies through a provision recognising that two distinct public bodies can be considered as two persons for the purpose of implementing ownership unbundling. Combined operators: a provision provides that a combined operator can be operated, alternatively, either as an ownership unbundled operator, as an independent System Operator or as an Independent Transmission Operator.
-
14540/2/2008
summary
- #2895
-
2008/10/09
Council Meeting
-
2008/07/09
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
T6-0347/2008
summary
The European Parliament adopted, by 579 votes to 80 with 52 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/55/EC concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Romano Maria LA RUSSA (UEN/IT), on behalf of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. The main amendments - adopted under 1st reading of the codecision procedure - were as follows: Ownership unbundling: the key part of the resolution concerns the separation of ownership, which expressly prevents vertically integrated companies from holding an interest in both the supply and transmission of gas. It is recalled that the Commission's proposal would have given Member States two options: ownership unbundling, or the preservation of integrated supply and transmission companies, provided that the operation of the transmission network was handed over to an independent system operator (ISO). Eight Member States had proposed a third option which kept the transmission network with the suppliers but with a structure to ensure it operates independently in practice. Parliament confirmed its endorsement of a proposal based on the recent Commission compromise text, involving the creation of independent transmission system operators (ITOs). This proposal, like the "third option", would allow a company to retain the ownership of pipelines, if management of them is in the hands of a transmission system operator with "effective decision-making rights", but with some further safeguards of these rights. Parliament rejected the ISO option, but endorsed the ITO model. Accordingly, it deleted Article 9 on independent system operators. ITO model: Members inserted a new Chapter IVa on Independent Transmission System Operators, which allows for vertical integration and preserves effective unbundling. The ITO model leaves ownership of pipelines with the with the gas supply companies, but hands the management over to an ITO whose operational independence would be guaranteed by a an independent Trustee ; a supervisory body composed of gas company representatives, third party shareholders, transmission system operator representatives, as well as the Trustee - responsible for decisions which may have a significant impact on the value of the assets of the shareholders; a compliance programme and a compliance officer responsible for monitoring the implementation of the compliance programme. Trustee: an independent Trustee shall be appointed by the regulatory authority on the proposal and at the expense of the vertically integrated undertaking. The Trustee shall act exclusively in the legitimate interest of the vertically integrated undertaking in the preservation of the asset value of the transmission system operator, while safeguarding the independence of the transmission system operator from the vertically integrated undertaking. In the exercise of its functions, the Trustee shall have no regard to the interest of the production and supply business of the vertically integrated undertaking. Revision clause: the Agency shall after 5 years, submit a detailed report outlining the extent to which the unbundling requirements under the Directive have been successful in ensuring full and effective independence of transmission system operators. It must take into account the following criteria: fair and non-discriminatory network access, effective regulation, the development of the network, investments and undistorted incentives to invest, the development of interconnection infrastructure, and the security of supply situation in the Community. In the event that the detailed report determines that the conditions referred to above have not been guaranteed in practice, the Commission shall submit proposals to ensure full and effective independence of transmission system operators. No later than five years after the directive's entry into force, the Commission must submit a detailed report outlining the feasibility of creating a single European transmission system operator and analyse the costs and benefits with respect to, notably, property rights, market integration as well as the effective and secure operation of the transmission network. Access to LNG facilities and storage: a new clause states that, for the organisation of access to LNG facilities either the regulated access procedure, or the negotiated access procedure shall apply. These procedures shall operate in accordance with objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria. National regulatory authorities shall observe compliance with these criteria. The same applies for access to storage. Comitology: the use of comitology to adopt guidelines was generally deleted. The Commission's text is strengthened on elements such as powers of national regulators and fight against market concentration. Consumer rights: consumers should be at the centre of the Directive. Parliament stipulated that Member States must protect final customers and ensure that there are adequate safeguards to protect vulnerable customers, including prohibiting the disconnection of pensioners and disabled people in winter. In this context, Member States shall recognise energy poverty and shall provide definitions of vulnerable customers. Rights and obligations linked to vulnerable customers must be applied and, final customers in remote areas protected. Member States must ensure high levels of consumer protection, particularly with respect to transparency regarding contractual terms and conditions, general information and dispute settlement mechanisms. Eligible customers must be able easily to switch to a new supplier. In addition, Member States shall implement measures to achieve the objectives of social and economic cohesion, with a view to lowering the cost of gas provided to low-income household customers and guaranteeing the same conditions for the customers living in remote areas, and the objectives of environmental protection. Those measures include energy efficiency/demand-side management measures and means to combat climate change, and security of supply. Additional measures for consumers include: - the right to withdraw from contracts with their gas providers without charge; - the right to compensation if service quality levels are not met (as with, for example, inaccurate and delayed billing); - access to information on their rights through bills and gas company web sites; - access to information on procedures to be followed in case of disputes; - the right to be informed, at least quarterly, of actual gas consumption and costs; - access to smart meters within 10 years of the directive's entry into force. - independent complaints services and alternative redress schemes such as an independent energy ombudsman or a consumer body. Energy efficiency: national regulatory authorities shall mandate natural gas undertakings to introduce pricing formulas which increase in the case of greater levels of consumption customers and distribution system operators in system operations by supporting the introduction of measures to optimise the use of gas, particularly during peak hours. Such pricing formulas, combined with the introduction of smart meters and grids, shall promote energy efficiency behaviour and the lowest possible costs for household customers, in particular household customers suffering energy poverty. Independenceof national regulators: Parliament approved and extended the Commission's proposals seeking to harmonise and strengthen the role of the national regulators. The national regulatory authorities should be able to monitor the occurrence of restrictive contractual practices. They should be able to fix or approve network access tariffs and publishing the methodology used to set the tariffs, and ensure that wholesale fluctuations in prices are transparent. The power of NRAs to impose sanctions is strengthened. Infrastructure: the Commission's exemption decision will lose its effect if the infrastructure has not become operational five years after all national and regional decisions and authorisations have been issued, unless the delay is due to circumstances beyond control of the person to whom the exemption has been granted. Parliament also added a clause to ensure that new investments are not discriminated against. Conditions of exemption approvals should not be changed retrospectively without the agreement of all parties concerned. Regional cooperation: Parliament deleted comitology provisions on regional solidarity cooperation. The Agency shall cooperate with national regulatory authorities and transmission system operators to ensure the convergence of regulatory frameworks between the regions with the aim of creating a competitive internal market. Where the Agency considers that binding rules on such cooperation are required, it shall make appropriate recommendations. Lastly, Parliament added clauses on policy obligations for the promotion of biogas and rules on price regulation.
- Results of vote in Parliament
-
T6-0347/2008
summary
-
2008/07/09
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
- SP(2008)4891
- DG Energy and Transport, PIEBALGS Andris
-
2008/07/08
Debate in Parliament
- 2008/06/13 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
- #2875
-
2008/06/06
Council Meeting
- 2008/06/05 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- #2854
-
2008/02/28
Council Meeting
- 2008/02/12 Committee draft report
- #2835
-
2007/11/29
Council Meeting
- 2007/10/11 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2007/09/19
EP officialisation
-
2007/09/19
Legislative proposal
-
COM(2007)0529
summary
PURPOSE: to amend Directive 2003/55/EC concerning the common rules for the internal market in natural gas. PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council. BACKGROUND: this proposal constitutes one element of a third package of legislative measures which aims to complement the existing rules to make the internal market work for all consumers whether large or small, and to help the EU achieve more secure, competitive and sustainable energy. The Commission is proposing a number of measures to complement the existing rules (see also COD/2007/0195; COD/2007/0197; COD/2007/0198; COD/2007/0199). The Commission Communication of 10 January 2007 entitled "An Energy Policy for Europe" (COM(2007)0001) highlighted the importance of completing the internal market in electricity and natural gas. It was backed by a comprehensive internal market report, the final results of the competition sector inquiry and in-depth reviews of the situation of the national electricity and gas market. The 2007 Spring European Council invited the Commission to propose further measures, such as: i) the effective separation of supply and production activities from network operation; ii) the further harmonisation of the powers and enhanced independence of the national energy regulators; iii) the establishment of an independent mechanism for cooperation among national regulators; iv) the creation of a mechanism for transmission system operators to improve the coordination of networks operation and grid security, cross-border trade and grid operation; v) greater transparency in energy market operations. The European Council also underlined the need to strengthen security of supply in a spirit of solidarity between Member States. In its Resolution on Prospects for the internal gas and electricity market adopted on 10 July 2007, the European Parliament expressed strong political support for a common energy policy, considering that "transmission ownership unbundling is the most effective tool to promote investments in infrastructures in a non-discriminatory way, fair access to the grid for new entrants and transparency in the market". It also underlined, however, that other measures were also necessary and that the differences between the electricity and gas markets might call for differing implementation arrangements. Parliament also called for enhanced "cooperation between national regulators at EU level, through an EU entity, as a way to promote a more European approach to regulation on cross-border issues" (see INI/2007/2089). CONTENT: these following elements were taken fully into consideration in drawing up the current proposals: Effective separation of supply and production activities from network operations: the concrete proposal in this respect makes it clear that the preferred option of the Commission remains ownership unbundling. Unbundling refers to the effective separation between the operation of electricity and gas transmission networks from supply and generation activities. In practice this means that Member States must ensure that the same person or persons cannot exercise control over a supply undertaking and, at the same time, hold any interest in or exercise any right over a transmission system operator or transmission system. This provision also applies vice versa, that is, control over a transmission system operator precludes the possibility of holding any interest in or exercising any right over a supply undertaking. Whilst the Commission considers that ownership unbundling remains the preferred option it does however provide an alternative option for Member States that choose not to go down this path. This option must, however, provide the same guarantees regarding independence of action of the network in question and the same level of incentives on the network to invest in new infrastructure that may benefit competitors. This option, a derogation from the basic ownership unbundling approach, is known as the "Independent System Operator". This option enables vertically integrated companies to retain the ownership of their network assets, but requires that the transmission network itself is managed by an independent system operator - an undertaking or entity entirely separate from the vertically integrated company - that performs all the functions of a network operator. In addition, to ensure that the operator remains and acts truly independently of the vertically integrated company, regulation and permanent regulatory monitoring must be put in place. With a view to encouraging investment in new energy infrastructures by supply and production companies, the present proposal includes the possibility of a temporary derogation to ownership unbundling rules for the construction of new infrastructure. This exemption will be applied on a case by case basis, taking into account in the economics of the new investment, the internal market objectives and the security of supply objective. It should be noted that this proposal applies in the same way to publicly and privately owned companies. Third country aspects: the present proposal requires the effective unbundling of transmission system operators and supply and production activities not only at national level but throughout the EU. It means in particular that no supply or production company active anywhere in the EU can own or operate a transmission system in any Member State of the EU. This requirement applies equally to EU and non-EU companies. The package contains safeguards to ensure that in the event that companies from third countries wish to acquire a significant interest or even control over an EU network, they will have to demonstrably and unequivocally comply with the same unbundling requirements as EU companies. The Commission can intervene where a purchaser cannot demonstrate both its direct and indirect independence from supply and generation activities. National regulators: the present proposal aims to strengthen the powers of the regulatory authorities. First, they would be given a clear mandate to cooperate at European level, in close cooperation with the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators and the Commission, to ensure competitive, secure and environmentally sustainable internal electricity and gas markets within the European Union, and effective market opening for all consumers and suppliers. Second, it is proposed to strengthen their market regulation powers, in particular in the following areas: i) monitoring compliance of transmission and distribution system operators with third party access rules, unbundling obligations, balancing mechanisms, congestion and interconnection management; ii) reviewing the investment plans of the transmission system operators, and providing in its annual report an assessment of how far the transmission system operators' investment plans are consistent with the European-wide 10-year network development plan; monitoring network security and reliability, and reviewing network security and reliability rules; iii) monitoring transparency obligations; iv) monitoring the level of market opening and competition, and promoting effective competition, in cooperation with competition authorities; and v) ensuring that consumer protection measures are effective. It is proposed that the regulatory authority be legally distinct and functionally independent of any other public or private entity, and that its staff and any member of its decision-making body act independently of any market interest and neither seek nor take instruction from any government or other public or private entity. The Agency for the cooperation of energy regulators: The Commission believes that if an independent body should be established which can make proposals to the Commission regarding decisions that involve substantive decisions and take individual regulatory decisions which are binding on third parties concerning detailed technical issues that are delegated to them, the only solution would be to establish an Agency. The Agency would complement at European level the regulatory tasks performed at national level by the regulatory authorities by: i) providing a framework for national regulators to cooperate; ii) regulatory oversight of the cooperation between transmission system operators; iii) individual decision powers; iv) general advisory role: the Agency would in general have an advisory role vis-à-vis the Commission as regards market regulation issues and could issue non-binding guidelines to publicise good practices among the national regulators. The total annual costs of the Agency are estimated at approximately EUR 6-7 million per year. Cooperation between transmission system operators: for market integration to take place, there also needs to be effective cooperation among transmission system operators (TSOs) and a clear and stable regulatory framework, including regulatory coordination. It is therefore proposed to task the transmission operators with strengthening their cooperation in a number of key areas, focusing on the following main issues: development of market and technical "codes"; research and innovation activities of common interest; coordination of grid operation and investment planning. It is important for the transmission system operators' cooperation structures to be fully recognised at European level as having the authority to carry out the above tasks. For that purpose, the Commission will formally designate the European Networks of (gas and electricity) transmission system operators in charge of these tasks. It should be noted that the network of operators can only cooperate successfully when all operators are on a level playing field. This means that all operators must be effectively unbundled. Improving the functioning of the market: the proposed energy package also aims at improving the legislative framework to facilitate third party access to key infrastructures, to increase transparency on the market, to enhance market integration and to improve access to retail customers. With this in mind, the Commission proposes to make the good practice guidelines legally binding. The Commission also states that transparent rules on access to LNG terminals are needed. To reduce uncertainty on the market, the Commission will, in the coming months, provide guidance in an appropriate form on the compliance of downstream bilateral long-term supply agreements with EC competition law. Lastly, with a view to stimulating this process, the Commission is considering setting up a retail forum. This forum would allow to focus on specific retail issues, and it should serve as a platform for all stakeholders to promote the establishment of an EU wide retail market. Reinforce the security of supply monitoring by transmission system operators: as a first step, the present proposals do not modify Directive 2004/67/EC and only address two issues: increased transparency obligations on the level of commercial stocks. Each storage operator would have the obligation to publish on a daily basis the amount of working gas it has in its facilities. This obligation would considerably increase mutual confidence for regional and bilateral assistance in case of severe supply disruptions. It is proposed that Member States cooperate in order to promote regional and bilateral solidarity. This cooperation is intended to cover situations which would be likely to result in severe disruptions of gas supply affecting a Member State . The Commission will adopt guidelines for regional solidarity cooperation, if needed.
- DG Energy and Transport, PIEBALGS Andris
-
COM(2007)0529
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2007)0529
- Committee draft report: PE400.700
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0257/2008
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T6-0347/2008
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4891
- Council position published: 14540/2/2008
- Commission communication on Council's position: COM(2008)0907
- Committee draft report: PE421.368
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A6-0238/2009
- Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading: T6-0244/2009
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3507
- Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading: COM(2009)0316
- : Directive 2009/73
- : OJ L 211 14.08.2009, p. 0094
Votes
Report: La Russa A6-0257/2008 - Amendment 78/1
| Position | Total | ALDE | GUE/NGL | IND/DEM | NI | PPE-DE | PSE | UEN | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 631 | 89 | 22 | 2 | 20 | 257 | 200 | 40 | 1 | 1 |
| Against | 59 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 34 | 0 |
| Abstain | 18 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Report: La Russa A6-0257/2008 - Amendment 78/2
| Position | Total | ALDE | GUE/NGL | IND/DEM | NI | PPE-DE | PSE | UEN | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 422 | 55 | 22 | 4 | 9 | 126 | 137 | 33 | 36 | 9 |
| Against | 237 | 30 | 0 | 8 | 14 | 122 | 59 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Abstain | 36 | 4 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Report: La Russa A6-0257/2008 - Amendment 115
| Position | Total | ALDE | GUE/NGL | IND/DEM | NI | PPE-DE | PSE | UEN | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 278 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 231 | 6 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
| Against | 421 | 88 | 36 | 11 | 8 | 30 | 195 | 18 | 35 | 2 |
| Abstain | 11 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Report: La Russa A6-0257/2008 - Amendment 94/1
| Position | Total | ALDE | GUE/NGL | IND/DEM | NI | PPE-DE | PSE | UEN | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 609 | 91 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 242 | 193 | 36 | 36 | 1 |
| Against | 64 | 0 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Abstain | 13 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Report: La Russa A6-0257/2008 - Amendment 94/2
| Position | Total | ALDE | GUE/NGL | IND/DEM | NI | PPE-DE | PSE | UEN | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 325 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 14 | 245 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 0 |
| Against | 345 | 88 | 0 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 191 | 5 | 34 | 2 |
| Abstain | 27 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
Report: La Russa A6-0257/2008 - Amendment 143
| Position | Total | ALDE | GUE/NGL | IND/DEM | NI | PPE-DE | PSE | UEN | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 127 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 63 | 0 | 34 | 1 |
| Against | 572 | 75 | 34 | 9 | 16 | 256 | 138 | 43 | 1 | 0 |
| Abstain | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Report: La Russa A6-0257/2008 - resolution
| Position | Total | ALDE | GUE/NGL | IND/DEM | NI | PPE-DE | PSE | UEN | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 579 | 90 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 234 | 200 | 42 | 0 | 7 |
| Against | 80 | 0 | 35 | 10 | 9 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Abstain | 52 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 35 | 0 |
Recommendation for second reading: MUSSA A6-0238/2009 - Amendment 1
| Position | Total | ALDE | GUE/NGL | IND/DEM | NI | PPE-DE | PSE | UEN | Verts/ALE | correctional |
| For | 596 | 84 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 257 | 194 | 37 | 3 | 0 |
| Against | 45 | 0 | 24 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Abstain | 45 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 0 |
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| activities | added |
|
|
| committees | added |
|
|
| links | added |
|
|
| other | added |
|
|
| procedure | added |
|
|


