2002/0141(COD)
Products of animal origin, human consumption: safety, controls. Hygiene package
| AGRI | ENVI | ITRE | PECH | |
| Lead Rapporteur | SCHNELLHARDT Horst (PPE-DE) | |||
| Opinion Rapporteur(s) | AUROI Danielle (V/ALE) | HUDGHTON Ian (V/ALE) |
Legal basis: EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 152-p4
Procedure completed
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opinion | AGRI | AUROI Danielle (V/ALE) | |
| Lead | ENVI | SCHNELLHARDT Horst (PPE-DE) | |
| Opinion | ITRE | ||
| Opinion | PECH | HUDGHTON Ian (V/ALE) |
Legal Basis EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 152-p4
Activites
-
2005/12/05
Implementing legislative act
-
32005R2074
summary
ACT : Commission Regulation 2074/2005/EC laying down implementing measures for certain products under Regulation 853/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and for the organisation of official controls under Regulation 854/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation 882/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, derogating from Regulation 852/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Regulations 853/2004/EC and 854/2004/EC. CONTENT : - Regulation 853/2004/EC lays down specific requirements concerning hygiene rules for food of animal origin. It is necessary to lay down certain implementing measures for meat, live bivalve molluscs, fishery products, milk, eggs, frogs' legs and snails, and processed products thereof; - Regulation 854/2004/EC lays down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption. It is necessary to develop certain rules and further specify other requirements; - Regulation 882/2004/EC establishes at Community level a harmonised framework of general rules for the organisation of official controls. It is necessary to develop certain rules and further specify other requirements. The main elements of this Regulation are as follows : - requirements concerning food chain information for the purpose of Regulations 853/2004/EC and 854/2004/EC; - requirements concerning fishery products for the purpose of Regulations 853/2004/EC and 854/2004EC; - recognised testing methods for marine biotoxins for the purpose of Regulations 853/2004/EC and 854/2004/EC; - calcium content of mechanically separated meat for the purpose of Regulation 853/2004/EC; - lists of establishments for the purpose of Regulation 882/2004/EC; - model health certificates for frogs' legs, snails, gelatine and collagen for the purpose of Regulation 853/2004/EC; - derogation from Regulation 852/2004/EC for foods with traditional characteristics. ENTRY INTO FORCE : 11/01/2006. This Regulation shall apply from 01/01/2006 with the exception of Chapters II and III of Annex V (list of approved food establishments) which shall apply from 01/01/2007.
- OJ L 338 22.12.2005, p. 0083-0088
-
32005R2075
summary
ACT : Commission Regulation 2075/2005/EC laying down specific rules on official controls for Trichinella in meat. CONTENT : Regulations 853/2004/EC, 854/2004/EC and 882/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council lay down the health rules and requirements regarding food of animal origin and the official controls required. In addition to those rules, more specific requirements should be laid down for Trichinella. Meat of domestic swine, wild boar, horses and other animal species may be infested with nematodes of the genus Trichinella. Consumption of meat infested with Trichinella can cause serious disease in humans. Consequently, this Regulation lays down measures to prevent human disease caused by the consumption of meat infested with Trichinella. It defines: - the obligations of competent authorities and of food business operators; sampling of carcases; derogations; trichinella examination and application of health mark; staff training; methods of detection; contingency plans; recognition of officially Trichinella-free holdings; obligations on food business operators to inform; monitoring programmes; withdrawal of official recognition of Trichinella-free holdings or regions with negligible risk; - rules relating to import health requirements. ENTRY INTO FORCE : 11/01/2006. The Regulation shall apply from 01/01/2006.
-
32005R2076
summary
ACT : Commission Regulation 2076/2005/EC laying down transitional arrangements for the implementation of Regulations 853/2004/EC, 854/2004/EC and 882/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Regulations 853/2004/EC and 854/2004/EC. CONTENT : Regulations 853/2004/EC, 854/2004/EC and 882/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council lay down the health rules and requirements regarding food of animal origin and the official controls required. The entry into application on 1 January 2006 of these Regulations will entail considerable changes to the rules and procedures to be followed by food operators and the competent authorities of the Member States. The application of some of these measures with immediate effect from 1 January 2006 would present practical difficulties in some cases. A period should therefore be envisaged in order to permit a smooth transition to the full implementation of the new rules and procedures. It is appropriate that the duration of the transitional period of 4 years, ending on 31 December 2009, be fixed taking into account a first review of the new regulatory framework on hygiene scheduled within the first four years. Provision should therefore be made for a transitional period during which certain requirements laid down in those Regulations can be progressively implemented. With a view to a harmonised approach, that transitional period should in principle last four years but could, where justified, be shorter. Provision should also be made for the possibility or reviewing any of those arrangements in the light of experience gained. ENTRY INTO FORCE : 11/01/2006. The Regulation shall apply from 01/01/2006.
-
32005R2074
summary
-
2005/12/05
Implementing legislative act
-
32005R2074
summary
ACT : Commission Regulation 2074/2005/EC laying down implementing measures for certain products under Regulation 853/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and for the organisation of official controls under Regulation 854/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation 882/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, derogating from Regulation 852/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Regulations 853/2004/EC and 854/2004/EC. CONTENT : - Regulation 853/2004/EC lays down specific requirements concerning hygiene rules for food of animal origin. It is necessary to lay down certain implementing measures for meat, live bivalve molluscs, fishery products, milk, eggs, frogs' legs and snails, and processed products thereof; - Regulation 854/2004/EC lays down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption. It is necessary to develop certain rules and further specify other requirements; - Regulation 882/2004/EC establishes at Community level a harmonised framework of general rules for the organisation of official controls. It is necessary to develop certain rules and further specify other requirements. The main elements of this Regulation are as follows : - requirements concerning food chain information for the purpose of Regulations 853/2004/EC and 854/2004/EC; - requirements concerning fishery products for the purpose of Regulations 853/2004/EC and 854/2004EC; - recognised testing methods for marine biotoxins for the purpose of Regulations 853/2004/EC and 854/2004/EC; - calcium content of mechanically separated meat for the purpose of Regulation 853/2004/EC; - lists of establishments for the purpose of Regulation 882/2004/EC; - model health certificates for frogs' legs, snails, gelatine and collagen for the purpose of Regulation 853/2004/EC; - derogation from Regulation 852/2004/EC for foods with traditional characteristics. ENTRY INTO FORCE : 11/01/2006. This Regulation shall apply from 01/01/2006 with the exception of Chapters II and III of Annex V (list of approved food establishments) which shall apply from 01/01/2007.
- OJ L 338 22.12.2005, p. 0083-0088
-
32005R2075
summary
ACT : Commission Regulation 2075/2005/EC laying down specific rules on official controls for Trichinella in meat. CONTENT : Regulations 853/2004/EC, 854/2004/EC and 882/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council lay down the health rules and requirements regarding food of animal origin and the official controls required. In addition to those rules, more specific requirements should be laid down for Trichinella. Meat of domestic swine, wild boar, horses and other animal species may be infested with nematodes of the genus Trichinella. Consumption of meat infested with Trichinella can cause serious disease in humans. Consequently, this Regulation lays down measures to prevent human disease caused by the consumption of meat infested with Trichinella. It defines: - the obligations of competent authorities and of food business operators; sampling of carcases; derogations; trichinella examination and application of health mark; staff training; methods of detection; contingency plans; recognition of officially Trichinella-free holdings; obligations on food business operators to inform; monitoring programmes; withdrawal of official recognition of Trichinella-free holdings or regions with negligible risk; - rules relating to import health requirements. ENTRY INTO FORCE : 11/01/2006. The Regulation shall apply from 01/01/2006.
-
32005R2076
summary
ACT : Commission Regulation 2076/2005/EC laying down transitional arrangements for the implementation of Regulations 853/2004/EC, 854/2004/EC and 882/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Regulations 853/2004/EC and 854/2004/EC. CONTENT : Regulations 853/2004/EC, 854/2004/EC and 882/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council lay down the health rules and requirements regarding food of animal origin and the official controls required. The entry into application on 1 January 2006 of these Regulations will entail considerable changes to the rules and procedures to be followed by food operators and the competent authorities of the Member States. The application of some of these measures with immediate effect from 1 January 2006 would present practical difficulties in some cases. A period should therefore be envisaged in order to permit a smooth transition to the full implementation of the new rules and procedures. It is appropriate that the duration of the transitional period of 4 years, ending on 31 December 2009, be fixed taking into account a first review of the new regulatory framework on hygiene scheduled within the first four years. Provision should therefore be made for a transitional period during which certain requirements laid down in those Regulations can be progressively implemented. With a view to a harmonised approach, that transitional period should in principle last four years but could, where justified, be shorter. Provision should also be made for the possibility or reviewing any of those arrangements in the light of experience gained. ENTRY INTO FORCE : 11/01/2006. The Regulation shall apply from 01/01/2006.
- DG Health and Consumers,
-
32005R2074
summary
- 2004/04/30 Final act published in Official Journal
-
2004/04/30
Final act signed
-
2004/04/29
End of procedure in Parliament
-
2004/04/28
Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading
-
COM(2004)0342
summary
The European Commission can accept those amendments, which reflect the compromise text agreed between the European Parliament, the Council and Commission prior to the second reading. Specifically, they relate to: - a technical amendment clarifying the need to proceed, in the event of the emergency slaughter of animals, to an examination of the carcase as soon as possible; - a technical amendment, which ensures that control staff, in carrying out their tasks, have free access to the premises of food businesses; - an obligation on Member States to ensure that there is sufficient control staff for performing meat inspection in slaughterhouses. Greater flexibility concerning certain control activities in small businesses. In addition, the European Parliament, proposed two amendments, limiting the possibility for slaughterhouse staff to assist the official veterinarian in carrying cut meat inspection to poultry and rabbits, excluding veal claves and fattening pigs. The Commission feels that these do not reflect the compromise text agreed between the two institutions and is therefore unable to accept them. However, in order to reach a final agreement and to avoid having to go to a conciliation procedure, the Council had accepted amendments 9 and 14 on condition the Commission issue a declaration in Annex format to the modified proposal. This too, the Commission can accept. The Annex states that: The Commission will, as soon as possible after the entry into force of the Regulation, produce a report on slaughterhouse staff assisting in meat inspection with a view to examining whether and under what conditions the system in force at present for poultry meat and rabbit meat can be extended to other species such as fattening pigs and veal calves. The report will be accompanied by a legislative proposal as appropriate.
- DG Health and Consumers,
-
COM(2004)0342
summary
-
2004/04/16
Act approved by Council, 2nd reading
-
2004/03/30
Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading
-
T5-0219/2004
summary
The European Parliament has adopted the four reports by Mr Horst SCHNELLHARDT (EPP-ED, D) on the reform community legislation concerning the hygiene of foodstuffs. The Parliament reintroduced amendments from the first reading which were not supported by the Commission and were not included in the Council's common position. Notable disagreements include the application of the HACCP system to primary production (Annex I of the Hygiene Package) as well as the powers of the Commission to use the comitology procedure modify the legislation's annexes on hygiene rules applicable to primary production and other types of food business (Annex II), on the specific rules on products of animal origin (Annex II - meat (red meat, poultry and game), milk, bivalve molluscs (oysters, mussels, clams etc.) and fish and on imports of animal products from third countries (Annex III). The Parliament underlined that official controls of fresh meat should in principle be carried out by official staff. However, the Member States may allow slaughterhouse staff to perform certain specific activities under the supervision of the official veterinarian but - according to two amendments adopted by MEPs - this possibility should be restricted to poultry and rabbit meat. These two particularly controversial points supported by Parliament are contested by both the Council and the Commission. Their adoption by Parliament probably means that conciliation will be necessary. The House also adopted an amendment which calls on Member States to ensure that food business operators offer all assistance needed to ensure that official controls carried out by the competent authority can be performed effectively. They should in particular give access to all buildings, premises, installations or other infrastructures; and make available any documentation and record required under the present regulation or considered necessary by the competent authority for judging the situation.
-
T5-0219/2004
summary
- 2004/03/08 Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
-
2004/01/20
Committee draft report
- PE340.773
- 2004/01/15 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
- #2536
-
2003/10/27
Council Meeting
-
11583/1/2003
summary
The common position incorporates several changes compared to the Commission's original proposal. Several of these changes are consistent with the aims of amendments that the European Parliament proposed in its first-reading opinion. These changes concern the following issues : 1) Regulation on official food and feed controls (COD/2003/0030) : the Commission's original proposal contained a number of references to the Regulation on official food and feed controls, which would establish general rules for official controls on all types of food and on feed. However, it appears likely that adoption of the new food hygiene legislation will take place some time before that of the Regulation on official food and feed controls. The common position therefore contains no reference to that Regulation. Instead, it incorporates some of its provisions, particularly as regards definitions and enforcement action. 2) Scope : there are close links between the second and third Regulations in the hygiene package. The second Regulation would lay down specific hygiene rules for products of animal origin. The third Regulation provides for official controls on such products. The Council agrees that both Regulations ought to have the same scope. The common position is therefore consistent with the aim of the European Parliament amendments that seek to import into the third Regulation the scope and exemptions provided for in the second. The common position also clarifies that the performance of official controls in no way diminishes food business operators' responsibility for ensuring food safety. 3) Definitions : the common position incorporates four definitions from the proposed Regulation on official food and feed controls. In addition it: would preserve the definition of "competent authority" used in several existing veterinary Directives; provides for a definition of an "approved veterinarian" to cover private veterinarians carrying out specific official controls on holdings; clarifies that, while "official auxiliaries" must be appointed by the competent authority, they need not be "officers" (civil servants); provides for the incorporation of certain definitions laid down in Regulation 1774/2002/EC. 4) Approval of establishments : compared to the Commission's original proposal, the common position: provides some additional flexibility as regards conditional approval, particularly for factory and freezer vessels; contains clarification concerning existing establishments and wholesale markets; incorporates and generalises provisions on enforcement that initially appeared in Annex I; and provides for Member States to make lists of approved establishments available to the public. 5) Audits : the Commission's origin proposal provided for audits in respect of fresh meat. The common position establishes audits as a general principle for all food business operators handling products of animal origin falling within the scope of the Regulation. In view of their specific expertise, it would require official veterinarians to carry out audits of slaughterhouses, game-handling establishments and certain cutting plants. It would give Member States discretion to choose the most appropriate staff for audits of other establishments. 6) Official controls in respect of fresh meat : the Council agrees that the key principles applying to official controls inrespect of fresh meat ought to appear in an Article. It also agrees that Member States should follow a risk-based approach to assess the number of official staff that need to be present on the slaughter line in any particular slaughterhouse, but does not believe that it would be appropriate to extend this assessment to cover the food business operator's staff. It further agrees that there need to be strict and clear rules determining when slaughterhouse staff may assist with official controls. In particular, when carrying out certain specific tasks related to official controls, such staff must always work under the supervision of the official veterinarian and act independently from production staff. However, the Council does not believe that it is appropriate to place unnecessary restrictions on the scope of the procedure. The common position would initially give Member States the choice of allowing slaughterhouse staff to assist with official controls on animals reared as a group under the same conditions (poultry, lagomorphs, fattening pigs and fattening veal). The system could subsequently be extended through comitology to other types of animals in the light of experience. 7) Imports : the Council agrees that it is more appropriate for procedural rules concerning imports to appear in the Regulation dealing with official controls. It also believes that the rules must have the aim of ensuring that trade between the Community and third countries respects the principle of equivalence, while not imposing unnecessary or impracticable burdens on the parties involved. The common position would therefore: - establish the general rule that no third country may appear on a list of third countries from which imports are permitted unless a Community control has taken place in that third country, while providing flexibility for cases where such a control would provide no added value; - limit the requirement for third country establishments to appear on lists drawn up and updated through a Community procedure to those establishments that are a priority for enforcement action, while not affecting the basic requirement for all establishments involved in the manufacture of products of animal origin destined for export to the Community to comply with Community food law or equivalent rules; - make special provisions for vessels to reflect the fact that they may operate far from the territory of the third country the flag of which they are flying and that the administrative arrangements applying to establishments on land might not be applicable to vessels. Since most of the provisions concerning imports are points of principle, they appear in Articles. In addition, new Annexes V and VI list certain technical details, so that these might be amended through comitology if necessary. 8) Flexibility and comitology : the Council agrees that the Regulation should, like the other hygiene Regulations, contain a procedure enabling Member States to adopt national provisions adapting certain technical provisions in a transparent manner. It believes, however, that this flexibility should only apply to Annex I, since Annexes II to VI contain rules that should remain of general application. In the context of official controls, it is also appropriate to provide for the use of the flexibility procedure to enable pilot projects to take place to try out newapproaches to hygiene controls on meat. The Council also agrees that it should be possible to lay down transitional arrangements through comitology in addition to amendments to the Annexes and implementing measures. In addition, it believes that it should be possible to grant exemptions through the same procedure. In the interest of clarity, the common position lists in a single Article a number of specific decisions that could be taken through comitology. 9) Date of application : the Council considers that the scale of the reform of food hygiene legislation requires there to be a reasonable delay between adoption of the new rules and their application. It is also necessary to ensure that all elements of the hygiene package take effect at the same time. The common position therefore provides for the Regulation to apply eighteen months after the date on which all elements of the package are in force, but not before 1 January 2006. 10) Detailed rules for fresh meat (Annex I) : the common position incorporates a number of changes to the detailed requirements for official controls with respect to fresh meat. In particular, these rules: - no longer contain provisions that appear in the common position on the second Regulation (laying down specific hygiene rules for products of animal origin); - place greater emphasis on controls on meat from animals that have undergone emergency slaughter; - limit the scope of health marking to carcasses and part-carcasses of red meat to reflect the special role that the official veterinarian plays in such cases; - clarify the circumstances in which meat is to be declared unfit for human consumption, including meat with a pronounced sexual odour and blood; - establish a short list of official controls that only official veterinarians may carry out, rather than a long list of tasks with which official auxiliaries may assist. There would be some flexibility as regards official veterinarians' presence at slaughterhouses and game-handling establishments. The presence of at least one official veterinarian throughout ante-mortem and post-mortem inspection would remain the basic requirement, but competent authorities could adapt it on the basis of a risk assessment and under strict conditions ensuring that proper inspection takes place. With respect to training, the common position would enable competent authorities to appoint official veterinarians without testing them, if the candidate has acquired all the required knowledge as part of a university degree, or through continuing education resulting in a post-graduate qualification. However, the Council does not believe that it would be appropriate in other circumstances for competent authorities to appoint practising veterinarians as official veterinarians without testing them. The common position also slightly alters the division between theoretical and practical training for official auxiliaries, without changing the overall requirement for 900 hours of training. It no longer includes a provision providing for an increase in the number of hours by a given date, since this was a political objective rather than a legal requirement. However, the Commission has undertaken, when preparing its report on the experience gained from the implementation of the Regulation, to consider whether it would be opportune to increase the minimum training requirements for official auxiliaries. 11) Detailed rules for live bivalve molluscs (Annex II) : the Council believes that the sampling frequency for toxin analysis in live bivalve molluscs should as a general rule be weekly during harvesting periods. It agrees, however, that there should be flexibility to increase or to decrease the frequency in the light of a risk assessment. The common position contains modernised criteria for the classification of production and relaying areas. The criteria for areas of classes B and C now refer only to E.coli, since there is agreement that faecal coliforms are not a reliable indicator of faecal contamination. It would be possible to amend these criteria and to specify sampling plans, methods and analytical tolerances through comitology. 12) Detailed rules for fishery products (Annex III) : the common position contains clarification concerning official controls on the production and placing on the market of fishery products. In particular, it includes detailed rules concerning official controls of vessels, to clarify which controls are necessary and which are possible taking account of the practical and legal specificities. 13) Detailed rules for raw milk (Annex IV) : the common position contains only those requirements that are specific to official controls on the production and collection of raw milk. It no longer includes rules that would have duplicated general requirements applicable to all products of animal origin. 14) Other : to be consistent with other parts of the hygiene package, the common position would require the Commission: - to consult EFSA when necessary; and - to report on the implementation of the Regulation after five years. The common position does not reflect those of the Parliament's amendments that the Commission was not able to accept, in particular those that: - would extend health marking to meat from poultry and lagomorphs; - deal with food business operators' responsibilities; - would place undue restrictions on the scope for slaughterhouse staff to assist with official controls; - would eliminate the possibility of visual post-mortem inspection of certain categories of fattening pigs; - anticipate the outcome of discussions that should take place in the context of negotiations on the proposed Regulation on official food and feed controls; or - would introduce specific provisions for small artisanal businesses.
- OJ C 048 24.02.2004, p. 0082-0130 E
-
11583/1/2003
summary
-
2003/10/21
Modified legislative proposal
-
COM(2003)0577
summary
The Commission presents an amended proposal which takes into account more than half the amendments made by the European Parliament. A large number of the proposed amendments aim to improve the proposal from a technical and editorial point of view. Most of these amendments are welcomed by the Commission (in some cases subject to editorial changes). However, certain of these amendments unnecessarily tighten the requirements of the proposal. In other cases, more appropriate wording has been proposed in the framework of the work carried out in Council. These amendments are rejected. The principal amendments accepted are: - extra flexibility as regards official controls in small meat businesses. The concept of 'artisanal small businesses,' is rejected since it conflicts with the general food safety policy of the Commission; - certain amendments deal with introducing in the text requirements for imports that were previously contained in 'Hygiene 2'. This is in principle in line with the approach of the Commission and of the Council. However, certain detailed requirements contained in some amendments are not always consistent with the approach of the Commission and of the Council, and sometimes duplicate the Commission proposal on official feed and food controls. These are rejected. The other amendments require important redrafting; - a number of amendments aim at introducing flexibility in the system of food chain information (information from the farm that has to accompany the animals to slaughter). Some are acceptable. As regards the identification of animals in particular, animals whose identity cannot be ascertained should in principle not be slaughtered for human consumption. These amendments can therefore not be accepted. - it has been decided that health marking would be limited to red meat (thus excluding poultry and rabbits) at the level of the slaughterhouse, as it was considered that systematic official carcass-by-carcass inspection was only required at this level. Therefore, certain amendments on this cannot be accepted, as they are not in line with this approach: - the Commission text provides for the possibility of the use of company staff for certain control activities. A number of amendments have been adopted that aim at bringing this company staff very much into the sphere of the competent authority. The Commission believes these two things should be kept separate. The Commission does agree to introduce some extra requirements for the establishments using company staff in control activities; - the amendment stating that the presence of the official veterinarian in small slaughterhouses should be based on an analysis of risks, is in line with the original Commission proposal and is therefore acceptable; - nearly all the amendments that deal with the training requirements for official veterinarians and official auxiliaries can be accepted as they integrate technical specifications that are more or less in line with the general food safety policy; - a number of amendments have been tabled that specifically concern live bivalve molluscs and fishery products. Most of these concern the issue of marine biotoxins in molluscs. The Commission accepts some, but most are rejected as they aim at unnecessarilyweakening the provisions for marine biotoxins, or unnecessarily limits the freedom of action by the competent authority in case of risks; - the Commission accepts the amendments relating to: communication of the lists of approved establishments; emergency slaughter; the tasks of official auxiliaries; the approved veterinarian, and the presence of the competent authority in cutting plants.
- DG Health and Consumers,
-
COM(2003)0577
summary
- #2524
-
2003/07/22
Council Meeting
-
2003/06/05
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
T5-0254/2003
summary
The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Horst SCHNELLHARDT (EPP-ED, Germany) and made several amendments to the Commission's proposal. (Please see the document dated 30/04/03.) Parliament added that: - producers and operators who perform better with regard to food safety and whose products present less risk should receive a reward for their investment in the form of lower inspection costs; - the Commission must draw up lists of the third countries from which imports of products of animal origin are permitted, taking into account several specified factors; - the Commission must lay down special import conditions for each third country countries. These special import conditions must include certain specified factors; - the official veterinarian will stipulate which products may be marketed in the pet food sector in the light of Regulation 1774/2002/EC; - Member States may lay down special rules for part-time official veterinarians responsible for inspecting artisanal small businesses.
- OJ C 068 18.03.2004, p. 0330-0435 E
-
T5-0254/2003
summary
-
2003/04/30
Committee draft report
- PE328.751
- A5-0156/2003
- #2500
-
2003/04/08
Council Meeting
- 2003/02/27 Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
- 2002/09/02 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2002/07/11
Legislative proposal
-
COM(2002)0377
summary
PURPOSE : to replace the existing Community legislation on detailed rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption, thus making it more coherent, more science-based and risk-based. CONTENT : the new elements (from new scientific advice that has become available, in particular on issues that relate to meat safety) aim to revise in a fundamental way the proposed Regulation on detailed rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption (COD/2000/0180). The Commission therefore decided, on 11 December 2001, to withdraw the proposal contained in Document and to submit a revised proposal. This proposal contains a revised version and completely replaces the previous document. The revision concerns mainly official controls of fresh meat. At the same time, the risk management measures for live bivalve molluscs as well as for milk and milk products, have been strengthened. The proposed system for official controls is characterised by the following: - it is science-based; - it addresses all known hazards that are relevant for the safety of the meat; - the official veterinarian plays a central role in the system; - it consists of official audits of the systems put in place by the operator, and also of official inspection activities; - it clearly integrates the stable-to-table approach; - it deals with the relevant animal health and animal welfare issues; - the frequency and intensity of official controls is risk-based; - it contains, for certain sectors and on certain conditions, the possibility of involvement of staff of the establishment; - it contains training requirements for all staff carrying out official controls.
- OJ C 262 29.10.2002, p. 0449 E
- DG Health and Consumers,
-
COM(2002)0377
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2002)0377
- Legislative proposal: OJ C 262 29.10.2002, p. 0449 E
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0281/2003
- Committee draft report: PE328.751
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A5-0156/2003
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T5-0254/2003
- Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: OJ C 068 18.03.2004, p. 0330-0435 E
- Modified legislative proposal published: COM(2003)0577
- Council position published: 11583/1/2003
- Council position: OJ C 048 24.02.2004, p. 0082-0130 E
- Committee draft report: PE340.773
- Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A5-0138/2004
- Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading: T5-0219/2004
- Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading: COM(2004)0342
- : Regulation 2004/854
- : OJ L 226 25.06.2004, p. 0083-0127
- Implementing legislative act: 32005R2074
- Implementing legislative act: OJ L 338 22.12.2005, p. 0083-0088
- Implementing legislative act: 32005R2075
- Implementing legislative act: 32005R2076
- Implementing legislative act: 32005R2074
- Implementing legislative act: OJ L 338 22.12.2005, p. 0083-0088
- Implementing legislative act: 32005R2075
- Implementing legislative act: 32005R2076
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| activities | added |
|
|
| committees | added |
|
|
| links | added |
|
|
| other | added |
|
|
| procedure | added |
|
|


